ChatGPT-4 accuracy for patient education in laryngopharyngeal reflux

INTRODUCTION

Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence-powered language model chatbot able to help otolaryngologists in practice and research. The ability of ChatGPT in generating patient-centered information related to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) was evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-five questions dedicated to definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of LPRD were developed from the Dubai definition and management of LPRD consensus and recent reviews. Questions about the four aforementioned categories were entered into ChatGPT-4. Four board-certified laryngologists evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 with a 5-point Likert scale. Interrater reliability was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean scores (SD) of ChatGPT-4 answers for definition, clinical presentation, additional examination, and treatments were 4.13 (0.52), 4.50 (0.72), 3.75 (0.61), and 4.18 (0.47), respectively. Experts reported high interrater reliability for sub-scores (ICC = 0.973). The lowest performances of ChatGPT-4 were on answers about the most prevalent LPR signs, the most reliable objective tool for the diagnosis (hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH)), and the criteria for the diagnosis of LPR using HEMII-pH.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT-4 may provide adequate information on the definition of LPR, differences compared to GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), and clinical presentation. Information provided upon extra-laryngeal manifestations and HEMII-pH may need further optimization. Regarding the recent trends identifying increasing patient use of internet sources for self-education, the findings of the present study may help draw attention to ChatGPT-4's accuracy on the topic of LPR.

Effect of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB) on the Microbiological Comprise of the Laryngopharynx

OBJECTIVE

To probe the microbiota composition progressing from healthy individuals to those with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and subsequently undergoing potassium-competitive acid inhibitor (P-CAB) therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case-control study.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

METHODS

Forty patients with LPRD and 51 patients without LPRD were recruited. An 8-week P-CAB therapy was initiated (post-T-LPRD), and 39 had return visits. In total, 130 laryngopharyngeal saliva samples were collected and sequenced by targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene using an Illumina MiSeq. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and clinical indices were analyzed.

RESULTS

Alpha and beta diversities were compared among the non-LPRD, LPRD, and post-T-LPRD groups, and the Observed_ASVs were not significantly different. At the same time, the Shannon and Simpson indices, unweighted Unifrac, weighted Unifrac, and binary Jaccard distance were significantly different between non-LPRD and LPRD groups. In addition, significant differences were found in the abundance of Streptococcus, Prevotella, and Prevotellaceae in the LPRD versus non-LPRD groups, and Neisseria, Leptotrichia, and Allprevotella in the LPRD versus post-T-LPRD groups. The genera model was used to distinguish patients with LPRD from those without, and a better receiver operating characteristic curve was formed after combining the clinical indices of reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, and pepsin, with an area under the curve of 0.960.

CONCLUSION

Laryngopharyngeal microbial communities changed after laryngopharyngeal reflux and were modified further after P-CAB treatment, which provides a potential diagnostic value for LPRD, especially when combined with clinical indices.

Ocular Surface Disease as Extraesophageal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Manifestation: A Specific Therapeutic Strategy

PURPOSE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are common gastrointestinal disorders with extraesophageal manifestations (EGERD). Studies showed a correlation between GERD/LPR and ocular discomfort. Our aim was to report the prevalence of ocular involvement in patients with GERD/LPR, describe clinical and biomolecular manifestations, and provide a treatment strategy for this novel EGERD comorbidity.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with LPR and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in this masked randomized controlled study. Fifteen naive patients with LPR were treated with magnesium alginate eye drops and oral therapy (magnesium alginate and simethicone tablets) with a 1-month follow-up. Clinical ocular surface evaluation, Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, tear sampling, and conjunctival imprints were performed. Tear pepsin levels were quantified by ELISA. Imprints were processed for human leukocyte antigen-DR isotype (HLA-DR) immunodetection and for HLA-DR, IL8, mucin 5AC (MUC5AC), nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) transcript expression (PCR).

RESULTS

Patients with LPR had significantly increased Ocular Surface Disease Index ( P < 0.05), reduced T-BUT ( P < 0.05), and higher meibomian gland dysfunction ( P < 0.001) compared with controls. After treatment, tear break-up time (T-BUT) and meibomian gland dysfunction scores improved to normal values. Pepsin concentration increased in patients with EGERD ( P = 0.01) and decreased with topical treatment ( P = 0.0025), significantly. HLA-DR, IL8, and NADPH transcripts were significantly increased in the untreated versus controls and comparable significant values were obtained after treatment ( P < 0.05). MUC5AC expression significantly increased with treatment ( P = 0.005). VIP transcripts were significantly higher in EGERD than in controls and decreased with the topical treatment ( P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in NPY.

CONCLUSIONS

We report an increase in prevalence of ocular discomfort in patients with GERD/LPR. The observations of VIP and NPY transcripts demonstrate the potential neurogenic nature of the inflammatory state. Restoration of the ocular surface parameters suggests the potential usefulness of topical alginate therapy.

Impact of Acid, Weakly Acid and Alkaline Laryngopharyngeal Reflux on Voice Quality

OBJECTIVES

To analyze pre to posttreatment voice changes regarding the type of reflux in patients with acid, weakly acid or alkaline laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

Patients with LPR, diagnosed using hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH), were prospectively recruited from three University Hospitals. Patients were treated with a combination of diet, proton pump inhibitors, magaldrate and alginate for 3 months. The following clinical and voice quality outcomes were studied pre to posttreatment according to the type of reflux (acid, weakly acid, nonacid): HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy features, reflux symptom score (RSS), reflux sign assessment (RSA), voice handicap index (VHI), perceptual voice assessment (grade of dysphonia and roughness), aerodynamic and acoustic measurements.

RESULTS

From December 2018 to March 2021, 160 patients completed the evaluations, accounting for 60 acid, 52 weakly acid, and 48 alkaline cases of LPR. There were no baseline differences in clinical and voice quality outcomes between groups. RSS and RSA significantly improved from pre to posttreatment in the entire cohort and in all patient groups. VHI, dysphonia and roughness, maximum phonation time, Jitter, Shimmer and noise to harmonic ratio significantly improved from pre to posttreatment. Individuals with alkaline reflux reported better voice quality improvements as compared to acid and weakly acid reflux patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with acid and alkaline reflux reported better posttreatment voice quality outcomes as compared to weakly acid reflux patients. Future basic science and clinical studies are needed to better understand the histological changes of the vocal folds due to reflux of varying pH types and gastroduodenal enzyme content.

Is there a role for voice therapy in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux? A pilot study

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of voice therapy combined with standard anti-reflux therapy in reducing symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

A randomised clinical trial was conducted. Fifty-two patients with LPR diagnosed by 24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring were randomly allocated in two groups: medical treatment (MT) and medical plus voice therapy (VT). Clinical symptoms and laryngeal signs were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and GRBAS scales.

Results

Groups had similar scores at baseline. At 3-month follow-up, a significant decrease in RSI and RFS total scores were found in both groups although it appeared to be more robust in the VT group. G and R scores of the GRBAS scale significantly improved after treatment in both groups, with better results in the VT group. The VHI total score at 3 months improved more in the VT group (VHI delta 9.54) than in the MT group (VHI delta 5.38) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The addition of voice therapy to medications and diet appears to be more effective in improving treatment outcomes in subjects with LPR. Voice therapy warrants consideration in addition to medication and diet when treating patients with LPR.

Salivary pepsin as an independent predictor of treatment response for laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study with multivariate analysis

To analyze the predictive value of salivary pepsin for treatment outcomes in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) using multivariate analysis that includes various associated factors. This prospective cohort study was conducted between August 2020 and August 2022. Patients with LPR who had symptoms lasting more than 1 month and a reflux symptom index (RSI) of 14 or higher were enrolled. The participants received a 2-month regimen of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment and lifestyle modification. Salivary pepsin was checked using fasting saliva before treatment. Salivary pepsin was detected more frequently in the good treatment response group (61.1%), compared to 14.3% in the poor response group. Similarly, patients with higher compliance to lifestyle modifications (> 90%) had a higher chance of a good response (91.7%) compared to those with lower compliance, who had a 53.8% chance of a good response. Other clinical factors have no significant association with treatment response. In multivariate analysis, both pretreatment salivary pepsin and higher compliance with lifestyle modification were found to be independent factors for treatment response (OR 14.457, CI 1.075 ~ 194.37 for both). This study found that positive salivary pepsin and strict lifestyle modification are independent predictors of treatment outcomes in LPR.

The Tibetan Formula Cong zhi 6 in the ORL (ENT) Practice: Experiences with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a frequent condition; in European countries, the prevalence can be estimated as 10-30% of the general population. Treatment includes lifestyle measures and highly dosed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over at least 4 weeks. However, PPIs are not unproblematic due to their potential side effects and the known phenomenon of rebound acid hypersecretion. Cong zhi 6 is a multi-herbal Tibetan formula additionally containing calcium carbonate and is available in several European countries as a food supplement Padma Aciben/Padma AciTib.

CASE REPORT

Ten patients with LPR took Cong zhi 6. The course of the complaints was documented, and the data were retrospectively analysed. Clinical symptoms as assessed with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) questionnaire and the findings in laryngoscopy with the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) both showed marked improvement of several symptoms. The number of patients with pathological LPR sum score was significantly reduced from 8 to 2 patients and from 10 to 1 patient in RSI and RFS, respectively. The mean sum scores were reduced from 18.1 to 8.4 (RSI) and from 12.9 to 4.4 (RFS), respectively. Also, other gastrointestinal symptoms, such as abdominal pain, bloating, feeling of fullness, and nausea, which are usually associated with functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, were markedly improved (reduction of mean score of the 3 most frequent symptoms by 77-87%).

CONCLUSION

Standard medical treatment for LPR consists in high dosed PPI for at least 4 weeks, which is known for several side effects and does not treat reliable the nonacid component of LPR of pepsin or other gastric enzymes. Therefore, other medical treatment options are urgently needed. The promising data of this case series suggest that the Tibetan herbal formula Cong zhi 6 may be a treatment option in LPR and related gastrointestinal symptoms and warrant further research.

Hintergrund

Der laryngopharyngeale Reflux (LPR) ist eine häufige Erkrankung. In europäischen Ländern wird die Prävalenz in der Gesamtbevölkerung auf 10–30% geschätzt. Die Behandlung beinhaltet Ernährungs- und Verhaltensänderung sowie die Gabe hochdosierter Protonen-Pumpen-Hemmer (PPI) über mindestens 4 Wochen. PPI sind jedoch aufgrund ihrer hohen potenziellen Nebenwirkungen und des bekannten Rebound-Phänomens der sauren Magensafthypersekretion nicht unproblematisch. Cong zhi 6 ist eine tibetische Rezeptur aus einem Vielpflanzengemisch sowie zusätzlich Calciumcarbonat und ist in einigen europäischen Ländern als Nahrungsergänzungsmittel Padma Aciben/Padma AciTib erhältlich.

Case Report

Zehn Patienten mit laryngo-pharyngealem Reflux (LPR) nahmen Cong zhi 6 ein. Der Beschwerdeverlauf wurde dokumentiert und die Daten retrospektiv analysiert. Die klinischen Symptome, die mithilfe des Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Fragebogens erfasst wurden und die mittels des Reflux Finding Score (RFS) beurteilten laryngoskopischen Befunde zeigten beide eine deutliche Verbesserung verschiedener Symptome. Die Zahl der Patienten mit pathologischen LPR-Summenscore reduzierte sich signifikant, im RSI von 8 auf 2 und im RFS von 10 auf 1 Patienten. Der mittlere Summenwert sank von 18.1 auf 8.4 (RSI) und von 12.9 auf 4.4 (RFS). Des Weiteren zeigte sich auch bei anderen gastrointestinalen Beschwerden, wie Bauchschmerzen, Blähungen, Völlegefühl und Übelkeit, die normalerweise mit funktioneller Dyspepsie oder Reizdarm zusammenhängen, eine deutliche Verbesserung (durchschnittliche Verringerung des Scores der drei häufigsten Symptome um 77–87%).

Zusammenfassung

Die medikamentöse Standardbehandlung bei LPR besteht aus der hochdosierten PPI-Gabe über mindestens 4 Wochen, die jedoch für verschiedene Nebenwirkungen bekannt ist und die nicht-saure Komponente von LPR, wie Pepsin oder andere digestive Enzyme, nicht mitbehandelt. Daher sind andere medikamentöse Behandlungsmöglichkeiten dringend erforderlich. Die vielversprechenden Daten dieser Fallserie deuten darauf hin, dass die tibetische Pflanzenrezeptur Cong zhi 6 eine Behandlungsoption bei LPR sowie deren gastrointestinalen Symptome darstellt und rechtfertigen weitere Studien.

Is empiric proton pump inhibition in patients with symptoms of extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux justified?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has had a marked increase in Western countries with a paralleling interest in extraesophageal (EE) manifestations of GERD, including laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). There are considerable differences in clinical practice between gastroenterologists, otolaryngologists and pulmonologists.

METHODS

In this narrative review we address some of these controversies concerning EE manifestations of GERD and LPR.

RESULTS

It is disputed whether there is causal relationship between reflux and the numerous symptoms and conditions suggested to be EE manifestations of GERD. Similarly, the pathophysiology is uncertain and there are disagreements concerning diagnostic criteria. Consequently, it is challenging to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations. A significant number of patients are given a trial course with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for several months before symptoms are evaluated. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs PPI treatment does not seem to be advantageous over placebo, and the evidence supporting that patients without verified GERD have any benefit of PPI treatment is negligible. There is a large increase in both over the counter and prescribed PPI use in several countries and a significant proportion of this use is without any symptomatic benefit for the patients. Whereas short-term treatment has few side effects, there is concern about side-effects after long-term use. Although empiric PPI treatment for suspected EE manifestations of GERD instead of prior esophageal 24-hour pH and impedance monitoring is included in several guidelines by various societies, this practice contributes to overtreatment with PPI.

CONCLUSION

We argue that the current knowledge suggests that diagnostic testing with pH and impedance monitoring rather than empiric PPI treatment should be chosen in a higher proportion of patients presenting with symptoms possibly attributable to EE reflux.

Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Comparison between 24-hour pH-Impedance Testing and Pharyngeal Probe (Restech) Testing, with Introduction of the Sataloff Score

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring using 24-hour esophageal pH-Impedance (HEMII-pH) testing versus pharyngeal pH (Restech) testing (Respiratory Technology Corporation, Houston, Texas) for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

Retrospectively, patients were reviewed who had completed a Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) survey and stroboscopy within 60 days before or after undergoing simultaneous esophageal pH-Impedance monitoring and Restech testing. Reflux Finding Score (RFS) was determined by 4 blinded observers. 80.45% of patients were on anti-reflux medications at the time of study and had incomplete response to treatment for reflux. Improvement on reflux treatment was determined by evaluating presenting pre-pH monitoring RFS, post treatment RFS, and improvement of symptoms. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relationships among RSI, RFS, and test results from HEMII-pH and Restech tests.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The inter-rater reliability of the RFS determination was 74.57%, and the intra-rater reliability was 67.00%. Subjects who had a positive RYAN Score had a significant correlation with RFS (r of 0.222 and p-value of 0.0492). There was no correlation between RFS and number or percent time of reflux events, longest event, total number of events, or percent of time at alkaline pH for either HEMII-PH or Restech test. RSI correlated better with HEMII-pH test than with Restech for percent time spent in both upright (r of 0.226 and p-value of 0.029) and supine position (r of 0.261 and a p-value of 0.032). Restech correlated better with total patient symptom Scores including cough, heartburn, burping, and throat clearing, with a r of 0.242 and a p-value of 0.048. Restech detected more percent time in reflux for total reflux, supine reflux, and upright reflux (p-value less than 0.0001). Restech also detected longer event times than Impedance (p-value of less than 0.0001). When diagnosis of LPR is based on the definition of CRC, the Sataloff Score test had 70.45% sensitivity and 80.95% specificity. The RYAN Score had a sensitivity of 72%, and a specificity of 56.45%, and the Wu Score had a sensitivity of 62.16%, and specificity of 54.05%. When the Sataloff and Wu Score were used together, the sensitivity was 71.45%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 59.46%.

CONCLUSION

The amount of time of reflux events correlates with symptoms better than the number of events. The HEMII-pH test was able to detect more events of pH<4 than Restech, possibly because there might have been more acid events below than above the upper esophageal sphincter, while Restech detected more total events. Restech recorded longer event times than HEMII-pH test. Since length of time correlates with RFS (probably reflecting laryngeal inflammation), and since laryngeal clearance of acid is more similar to pharyngeal than esophageal clearance, this finding might prove valuable clinically. The Sataloff Score has a sensitivity of 70.45%, and a specificity of 80.95% and appears useful clinically to detect mild to moderate that is missed by the RYAN Score. A combination of Sataloff Score and Wu Score may be clinically valuable to identify LPR with an increased sensitivity of 71.45% and increased specificity of 100%. The Wu Score is not yet available for the general clinical use, but the Sataloff Score is.

Multidimentional assessment of voice quality in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common disorder in world population. As a result of the regurgitation of acid content from the stomach to laryngopharynx and larynx, secondary damage of laryngeal mucosa occur, which is highly sensitive to hydrochloric acid, and morphological changes are observed. Symptomatology of laryngopharyngeal reflux is varied which makes differential diagnosis difficult.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was the assessment of voice quality, morphological changes in larynx as well as etiology of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.</br> <b><br>Material and method:</b> The severity of dysphonia was classified using perceptual and acoustic methods as well as RSI. Morphological control was performed using HSDI technique and RFS. Etiological factors were examined basing on barofunction of upper esophageal sphincter and 24-hour pH-metry of air exhaled expressed in Ryan score.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> In the majority of patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, dysphonia was recognized, intensified especially in women (G3R2B0A0S3), which was confirmed in Yanagihara classification (type III) and parameters of acoustic analysis. Voice disorders were the most frequently the result of edema and congestion of interarytenoid area, aytenoids and vocal folds. Those symptoms were caused by the decrease of upper esophageal sphincter tension and acidity of exhaled air which was confirmed in 24-hour pHmetry.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> It is important to educate physicians and patients about the possibilty of negative impact of reflux disease on the occurrence of voice quality disorders. Current diagnostic methods for dysphonia guarantee accurate recognition and therapeutic success improving the prognoses of patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.</br>.

Treating and Managing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in the Over 65s: Evidence to Date

Purpose

The clinical presentation and therapeutic outcomes of elderly patients may be different from those in younger populations, leading to additional diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. The present study reviewed the findings on the epidemiology, and clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic outcomes of elderly patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature search was conducted on the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic findings of elderly LPR patients.

Findings

The prevalence of LPR in the elderly population remains unknown. From a clinical standpoint, older LPR patients report overall lower symptom scores and related quality-of-life outcomes at the time of the diagnosis. The required treatment time to obtain symptom relief appears to be longer in older compared with younger patients. Particular attention needs to be paid to prolonged medication use because the elderly population is characterized by polypharmacy and there is a higher risk of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) interactions and adverse events. The plasma clearance of most PPIs is reduced with age, which must be considered by practitioners in the prescription of antireflux therapy.

Conclusion

The clinical presentation and treatment efficacy of elderly LPR patients differ from those in younger patients. Practitioners need to carefully consider the risk of drug interactions and adverse events in elderly patients.

Observations of increased gastroesophageal reflux symptomology in an anhydrous ammonia exposed population

OBJECTIVE

This case series describes a cohort of patients exposed to anhydrous ammonia vapors with clinical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The study characterizes the identification of LPR as a consequence of vapor inhalation and the utility of PPI therapy in LPR secondary to inhalational ammonia exposure.

METHODS

This is a case series of 15 patients exposed to anhydrous ammonia from a single chemical spill who experienced LPR several months after exposure. Symptoms of LPR were assessed at their initial consultation and by phone at least 30 days after treatment with low-dose PPI or diet modification. At this visit, patients underwent complete head and neck examination and flexible direct laryngoscopy.

RESULTS

15 patients were available for analysis before and after treatment. 93.3 % experienced at least three cardinal symptoms of LPR. 66 % of these patients had at least one LPR finding on flexible laryngoscopy. 73 % were treated with daily standard dose PPI, and 82 % of these patients experienced reduction of symptoms after 30 days of PPI treatment. Four of 15 patients were not taking the PPI as prescribed, and only one of these patients had resolution of LPR symptoms.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there is an association between anhydrous ammonia exposure and the development of LPR symptoms. In this study, treatment with PPIs was successful in reducing symptoms for most patients, and patients who did not receive PPIs experienced symptoms for a longer time.

The effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on salivary pepsin concentration in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication therapy on salivary pepsin concentration in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients with HP infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 477 patients with suspected LPR were enrolled from June 2020 to September 2021. Reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, the positive rates and disintegrations per minute values of HP infection detected by ¹⁴C urea breath test and salivary pepsin concentrations analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were compared in LPR patients and non-LPR patients with or without HP infection. HP-positive patients were treated with HP eradication therapy while HP-negative patients with PPI therapy.

RESULTS

The scores of nagging cough (0.88 vs. 0.50, P = 0.035), erythema or hyperemia (1.93 vs. 1.78, P = 0.035) and vocal fold edema (1.04 vs. 0.85, P = 0.025) were higher in the LPR (+) Hp (+) subgroup than in LPR (+) Hp (-) subgroup. The concentrations of salivary pepsin in the Hp (+) subgroup were higher than in the Hp (-) subgroup either in LPR patients (75.24 ng/ml vs. 61.39 ng/ml, P = 0.005) or the non-LPR patients (78.42 ng/ml vs. 48.96 ng/ml, P = 0.024). Compared to baseline (before treatment), scores of nagging cough (0.35 vs. 0.84, P = 0.019) and erythema or hyperemia (1.50 vs. 1.83, P = 0.039) and the concentrations of salivary pepsin (44.35 ng/ml vs. 74.15 ng/ml, P = 0.017) in LPR patients with HP infection decreased after HP treatment; yet, this was not observed for the LPR patients without HP infection treated with PPI only (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HP infection may aggravate the symptoms and signs of LPR patients, partly by increasing their salivary pepsin concentration.

Effects of acids, pepsin, bile acids, and trypsin on laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases: physiopathology and therapeutic targets

PURPOSE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a general term for the reflux of gastroduodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, oropharynx and even the nasopharynx, causing a series of symptoms and signs. Currently, little is known regarding the physiopathology of LPRD, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drugs of choice for treatment. Although acid reflux plays a critical role in LPRD, PPIs fail to relieve symptoms in up to 40% of patients with LPRD. The influence of other reflux substances on LPRD, including pepsin, bile acid, and trypsin, has received increasing attention. Clarification of the substances involved in LPRD is the basis for LPRD treatment.

METHODS

A review of the effects of acids, pepsin, bile acids, and trypsin on laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases was conducted in PubMed.

RESULTS

Different reflux substances have different effects on LPRD, which will cause various symptoms, inflammatory diseases and neoplastic diseases of the laryngopharynx. For LPRD caused by different reflux substances, 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry (MII-pH), salivary pepsin, bile acid and other tests should be established so that different drugs and treatment courses can be used to provide patients with more personalized treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

This article summarizes the research progress of different reflux substances on the pathogenesis, detection index and treatment of LPRD and lays a theoretical foundation to develop target drugs and clinical diagnosis and treatment.

[Effect of proton pump inhibitort on salivary pepsin concentration in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux]

Objective:To investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor（PPI） treatment on salivary pepsin concentration in laryngopharyngeal reflux（LPR）. Methods:152 patients with suspected LPR complaining non-specific symptoms such as foreign body sensation, dry throat, phlegm and other non-specific symptoms were enrolled， in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from August 2019 to December 2020. According to the scores of reflux symptom index（RSI） and reflux finding score（RFS）, all the patients were divided into LPR （+） group and LPR （-） group, RSI （+） group and RSI （-） group, RFS （+） group and RFS （-） group . Patients in the LPR （+） group were reassessed after 1 month of PPI treatment. Saliva samples were collected from all the patients at initial diagnosis and follow-up diagnosis after treatment. The salivary pepsin concentration was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA）. The differences of RSI, RFS scores and salivary pepsin concentrations before and after treatment were compared. Results:The median concentration of salivary pepsin in LPR （+） group was significantly higher than that in LPR （-） group, and （73.01 ng/mL vs 25.66 ng/mL, P<0.01）, the median concentration of salivary pepsin in RFS （+） group were significantly higher than that in RFS （-） group（78.00 ng/mL vs 35.79 ng/mL, P<0.01） Furthermore, the median scores of RSI （11.00 vs 7.00, P<0.05） and RFS （9.00 vs 7.00, P<0.01） of LPR （+） patients notably decreased after PPI treatment for 1 month, and the salivary pepsin median concentration was memorably lower than that before treatment（53.60 ng/mL vs 46.49 ng/mL, P<0.05）. Meanwhile, the scores of symptoms such as pharyngeal paraesthesia, heartburn, chest pain, stomachache, and the scores of signs such as false vocal fold, erythema or congestion, vocal fold edema, posterior commissure hypertrophy and thick endolaryngeal mucus were conspicuously lower after treatment than those before treatment（P<0.05）. Conclusion:After 1 month of PPI treatment, the scores of partial symptoms and signs, and the salivary pepsin concentrations of LPR patients decreased significantly, suggesting that pepsin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of LPR, and pepsin may be closely related to the symptoms and signs such as pharyngeal paraesthesia and vocal fold edema.

Proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux disease refers to abnormal reflux of gastric contents through the esophagus into the throat, which irritates and damages the pharyngeal mucosa, and causes corresponding symptoms. Proton Pump Inhibitors are an important class of gastric acid secretion inhibitors after H2 receptor blockers, which can be used clinically to treat peptic ulcer, abnormal gastric acid secretion and other related diseases. The common clinical drugs include omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole and so on. Clinical practice has shown that Proton Pump Inhibitors have a good therapeutic effect on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux disease, but evidence of evidence-based medicine is lacking. The purpose of this protocol is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux disease and to improve the evidence-based basis for the clinical application of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux disease.

METHODS

English computer retrieval database (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library) and Chinese computer retrieval database (Wanfang Database, VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform, Chinese Biomedical Database) . In addition, Baidu Scholar and Google Scholar were manually searched for randomized controlled clinical studies on the treatment of laryngeal reflux disease with Proton Pump Inhibitors from the establishment of the database to July 2020. Two researchers independently extracted and evaluated the data of the included studies, and meta-analysis was conducted on the included literatures with RevMan5.3 software without language restrictions.

RESULTS

In this study, the efficacy and safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux disease are evaluated by the overall response rate, clinical symptom remission rate and other indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide reliable evidence-based evidence for the clinical application of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux disease.OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605 / OSF.IO / NY6SC.

Comparison of Proton Pump Inhibitor and Triple Therapy Regimen for Laryngospharyngeal Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal reflux is retrograde flow of contents of the stomach to the larynx and the pharynx. The study aims to compare two regimens (proton pump inhibitor monotherapy versus triple therapy) on the outcome of Helicobactor pylori positive laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

METHODS

The presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux was determined by reflux symptom index and reflux finding score. The presence of Helicobactor pylori in the tissue was confirmed by rapid urease test. All urease test negative laryngopharyngeal reflux patients were given a course of proton pump inhibitors and results were evaluated. All urease test positive patients were divided into two groups. One group was given a course of proton pump inhibitors and another group was given a course of triple therapy and the results were compared.

RESULTS

A total number of 704 laryngopharyngeal reflux patients were screened for urease test. Among them 138 patients (19.6 %) were urease test negative and were given proton pump inhibitor therapy. Improvement in both reflux finding score (average score 11.75) and reflux symptom index (average score 5.25) score was observed after 3 months with p-value<0.05. In urease test positive patients, improvement in scores was observed in both proton pump inhibitors and triple therapy group, however marked improvement in the clinical features was observed in triple therapy group with p-value<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The study reveals association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and Helicobactor pylori. Proton pump inhibitor therapy is sufficient if no Helicobactor pylori is detected, however incase of presence of Helicobactor pylori, triple therapy gives better results.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: Comparing improvements in reflux symptom index with reflux finding score

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the correlation of reported symptom improvement in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) with physical findings on laryngoscopic examination following medical therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB-approved, retrospective, single-institution study included all patients who were diagnosed and medically treated for LPR from Jan. 1, 2015-October 21st, 2019. Only patients who received at least six weeks of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor and those with pre- and post-treatment Reflux Symptom Index; RSI (n = 91) and Reflux Finding Score; RFS (n = 33) were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis (61.54% female). There was a 19.99% improvement in total RSI (p = 0.0034) and a 25.20% improvement in total RFS (p = 0.0011) following at least six weeks of treatment (average = 253 ± 213 SD days). RSI symptoms were significantly decreased between pre- and post-treatment for hoarseness (p = 0.0005), clearing of the throat (p = 0.0066), excess throat mucus or postnasal drip (p = 0.0004), troublesome cough (p = 0.0231), and heartburn/chest pain (p = 0.0053). RFS demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in only subglottic edema (p < 0.0001) and ventricular obliteration (p = 0.0295). Pearson's correlation test did not demonstrate a relationship between RSI and RFS in the pre- and post-treatment analyses alone, but did demonstrate a statistically significant relationship when analyzed across all captured pre and post data (r = 0.265, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

RSI and RFS are complimentary to one another when assessing for treatment response, but improvement in RSI does not correlate with that in RFS.

[Clinical observation of the anti-reflux treatment for the chronic pharyngitis patients with the reflux finding score from 8 to 10]

Objective:To evaluate the anti-reflux treatment efficacy for the chronic pharyngitis patients with the reflux finding score（RFS） from 8-10. Method:One hundred and twelve patients with clinical diagnosis of chronic pharyngitis and RFS score of 8-10 were randomly divided into control and treatment groups. The treantment group was given the proton pump inhibitors, gastrointestinal motility drugs and the traditional Chinese patent drugs（treatment group）. The control group was given only the traditional Chinese patent drugs（control group）. Result:The visual analogue scale（VAS） of the patients in treatment group declined significantly after treatment. The efficacy of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group（77.36% vs 30.61%, P<0.01）. Conclusion:For the patients with chronic pharyngitis with RFS 8-10, anti-reflux treatment should be used together with traditional Chinese patent drugs.

Reflux finding score and reflux symptom index as potential predictors for proton pump inhibitor response in globus pharyngeus patients: A prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the patient-reported reflux symptom index (RSI) and the doctors-reported Reflux finding score (RFS) as potential predictors for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response in patients with suspected lower pharyngeal reflux, presenting with globus pharyngeus as their primary complaint.

METHODS

The research project was performed at the ENT department of Isala hospital Zwolle, the Netherlands. A before and after design was used for this single institution prospective exploratory study. 101 participants with globus pharyngeus symptoms as a primary complaint were included. All participants were assessed by an otorhinolaryngologist at enrollment and after eight weeks of esomeprazole use. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy was performed to document the RFS, and RSI questionnaires were self-administered by the participants. Our main outcome measurement was the patient- reported therapeutic response evaluation, that differentiated three categories: responders, partial responders and non-responders. For evaluation of the assessment tools, RFS > 7 and RSI > 13 were considered deviant.

RESULTS

Among the 101 participants, 43 (42.6%) were responders, 28 (27.7%) partial responders and 30 (29.7%) non-responders. Both baseline RSI > 13 and RFS > 7 were statistically significant associated with treatment response. Also, combined into RSI/RFS baseline categories, a significant overall association between baseline scores and patient-reported treatment response was found. Patients reported success rates for deviant RSI and RFS baseline scores were 76.6% and 96%, respectively. 95.5% of patients with both deviant RSI and RFS baseline scores, reported (partial) treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Both together, as well individually, pre-treatment RSI and RFS ratings can help predict treatment response of empirical PPI treatment in patients experiencing globus pharyngeus symptoms.

Comprehensive analysis of acidic pharyngeal reflux before and after proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVES

The usefulness of pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with symptoms attributed to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been questioned. One problem is the uncertainty whether the pharyngeal pH monitoring captures the aspects of LPR which are responsible for symptoms. We aimed to gain more insight into this problem by performing a comprehensive analysis of acidic pharyngeal reflux before and after the treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with suspected LPR.

METHODS

We used simultaneous pharyngeal and distal esophageal 24-hour pH/impedance monitoring to establish the gastroesophageal origin of pharyngeal reflux, and an unbiased approach to analysis by evaluating a whole range of pharyngeal reflux acidity (pH < 6, pH < 5.5, pH < 5.0, pH < 4.5 and pH < 4.0).

RESULTS

PPI treatment substantially (by ~50%) improved the symptoms attributed to LPR. In contrast, PPI did not reduce the number of pharyngeal reflux episodes or duration of pharyngeal acid exposure at any pH level. This was also true in a subgroup of patients considered to be good responders to PPI (symptoms improvement by ~75%). Furthermore, good responders did not have more acidic pharyngeal reflux than the patients who were less responsive to PPI.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI treatment did not reduce acidic pharyngeal reflux despite substantially improving the symptoms attributed to LPR. This may be because pharyngeal pH monitoring does not quantitatively capture the aspects of LPR responsible for symptoms or because acid causes the symptoms also by mechanisms other than LPR. Our results argue against the utility of pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with suspected LPR.

Gastric reflux: the therapeutical role of Marial®

The worldwide relevance of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has had a considerable increase in recent years. The guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD are well consolidated and continuously updated. Recently, the extra-esophageal manifestations of reflux have been considered from a multidisciplinary point of view, so the symptoms of the laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR) have been precisely defined. At present, a new Medical Compound (Marial®) has the indication for the treatment of both GERD and LPR. Clinical experience has initially confirmed its effectiveness in both disorders.

Relieving laryngopharingeral reflux (RELIEF) survey in otolaryngology - II the viewpoint of the patient

As LPR diagnostic work-up is complex in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test, patient symptoms have become a primary method to identify those with LPR. In this regard, Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a reliable self-administered questionnaire useful also to monitor changes after treatment. An Italian survey on patients with LPR evaluated the effect of treatments for LPR that were prescribed in a real-world setting, such as Otolaryngological clinics. In this part of the survey, 1,680 subjects [45.2% males, 54.8% females, 50.4 (14.7) years] were visited in the 86 Italian ORL centers. About 70% of patients were treated with Marial® alone, 27% with PPI plus add-on. RSI change assessment was the primary outcome. Both therapeutic options significantly (p<0.0001) reduced RSI score interestingly since the second week. The inter-group comparison demonstrated the Marial® monotherapy induced a greater reduction of RSI than PPI plus add-on since the second week. In conclusion, the present survey reported that a new medical device (Marial®) may be considered a valid option for the treatment of LPR.

Hoarseness in Adults

Hoarseness is a common presentation in primary care practices. Combined with other voice-related changes, it falls under the umbrella diagnosis of dysphonia. Hoarseness has a number of causes, ranging from simple inflammatory processes to less common psychiatric disorders to more serious systemic, neurologic, or cancerous conditions. Medication-induced hoarseness is common and should be considered. The initial evaluation begins with a targeted history and physical examination, while also looking for signs of potential systemic etiologies. Treatment should begin with voice rest, especially avoidance of whispering, and conservative management directed toward a presumptive cause. For example, proton pump inhibitors are appropriate for hoarseness due to reflux, and proper vocal hygiene is recommended for vocal abuse-related indications. In the absence of a clear indication, antibiotics, oral corticosteroids, and proton pump inhibitors should not be used for the empiric treatment of hoarseness. Direct visualization of the larynx and vocal folds, commonly mislabeled as vocal cords, should be performed within three months if an etiology has not been determined or if conservative management has been ineffective. Patients who experience symptoms lasting longer than two weeks and who have risk factors for dysplasia (e.g., tobacco use, heavy alcohol use, hemoptysis) may require earlier laryngoscopic evaluation. Voice therapy is effective for improving voice quality in patients with dysphonia if conservative measures are unsuccessful, and it can also be helpful for prophylaxis in high-risk individuals (e.g., vocalists, public speakers). Surgical management is indicated for laryngeal or vocal fold dysplasia or malignancy, airway obstruction, or benign pathology resistant to conservative treatment.

Rethinking the laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment algorithm: Evaluating an alternate empiric dosing regimen and considering up-front, pH-impedance, and manometry testing to minimize cost in treating suspect laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trials for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are common. A majority of the patients respond to acid suppression. This work intends to evaluate once-daily, 40 mg omeprazole and once-nightly, 300 mg ranitidine (QD/QHS) dosing as an alternative regimen, and use this study's cohort to evaluate empiric regimens prescribed for LPR as compared to up-front testing with pH impedance multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) with dual pH probes and high-resolution manometry (HRM) for potential cost minimization.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort review and cost minimization study.

METHODS

A chart review identified patients diagnosed with LPR. All subjects were treated sequentially and outcomes recorded. Initial QD/QHS dosing increased after 3 months to BID if no improvement and ultimately prescribed MII and HRM if they failed BID dosing. Decision tree diagrams were constructed to determine costs of two empiric regimens and up-front MII and HRM.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven subjects met the criteria. Responders and nonresponders to empiric therapy were identified. Seventy-two subjects (74%) responded. Forty-eight (67% of responders and 49% of all) improved with QD/QHS dosing. Forty-nine (51%) subjects escalated to BID dosing. Twenty-four subjects (33% of responders and 25% of all) improved on BID therapy. Twenty-five subjects (26%) did not respond to acid suppression. Average weighted cost was $1,897.00 per patient for up-front testing, $3,033.00 for initial BID, and $3,366.00 for initial QD/QHS.

CONCLUSIONS

An alternate QD/QHS regimen improved the majority who presented with presumed LPR. Cost estimates demonstrate that the QD/QHS regimen was more expensive than the initial BID high-dose PPI for 6 months. Overall per-patient cost appears less with up-front MII and HRM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 127:S1-S13, 2017.

Oropharyngeal Reflux Monitoring and Atypical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been increasing since the 1990 s, with up to 27.8 % of people in North America affected by this disorder. The healthcare burden of patients who primarily have extra-esophageal manifestations of GERD (atypical GERD) is estimated to be 5 times that of patients with primarily heartburn and regurgitation due to lack of a gold standard diagnostic test, poor responsiveness to PPI therapy, and delay in recognition. Empiric twice daily PPI therapy for 1-2 months is currently considered the best diagnostic test, but due to poor responsiveness to PPIs in patients with atypical GERD in multiple randomized controlled trials, newer modes of diagnostic procedures such as oropharyngeal pH monitoring have gained significantly more traction. The utility of oropharyngeal pH monitoring systems such as Restech Dx-pH is currently limited due to lack of consensus on normal and abnormal cutoff values. Recent studies suggest its utility as a prognostic tool and its ability to predict responsiveness to medical and surgical therapy. However, routine use of oropharyngeal pH monitoring is still not widespread due to the lack of well-controlled prospective studies.

[Clinical pilot study on the rhinitis due to laryngopharyngeal reflux]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relevance between nasal symptoms and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in patients with allergic rhinitis.

METHOD

Thirty patients of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease were diagnosed in ENT outpatient department in our hospital. All patients have symptoms of sneeze, nasal discharge as chief complaint and they responded no effect for other normal treatment for nasal-sinusitis at least three months. Orally before meals, a dose of 5 mg Mosapride citrate each time, three times a day for 7 days. Orally before meals, a dose of 20 mg Esomeprazole each time, two times a. day for 2-3 months. Nasal spray, one spray of azelastine hydrochloride once, two times a day for 2 month.

RESULT

Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptom scores at four time points (the first visit, post treatment 15 days, 45 days, 75 days) were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. There is a significant difference in four time points.

CONCLUSION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease has a strong association with allergic rhinitis. Patients who has allergic rhinitis nasal symptoms as chief complaint must be exclude, the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease first.

THE TRIBES AND TRIBULATIONS OF LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX: A REVIEW OF RECENT STUDIES WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS BETWEEN OTOLARYNGOLOGISTS AND GASTROENTEROLOGISTS

Laryngopharyngeal reflux has been recognized since 2006 (Montreal Consensus) as an extradigestive manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, despite numerous research studies, the relationship between these two pathologies is yet to be fully understood. The aim of this paper is to review the literature of the last five years available via the PubMed database, looking at the controversies about the prevalence, pathophysiology and diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

An Open Label, Prospective, Single Centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Dose Combination of Rabeprazole (Enteric-Coated, EC) 20 mg + Domperidone (Sustained Release, SR) 30 mg Capsule in Treatment of Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fixed dose combination of Rabeprazole (enteric-coated, EC) 20 mg + Domperidone (sustained release, SR) 30 mg for treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

DESIGN

A prospective, single centre, open-label, non-comparative, observational study

SETTING

The study was conducted at an otolaryngology clinic in India between May 2012 and November 2012.

PATIENTS

Patients (>18 yrs) with suspicious LPR-related symptoms, reflux symptom index (RSI) score >13 and reflux finding score (RFS) >7, willing to undergo rigid laryngoscopy and requiring fixed dose combination of Rabeprazole (enteric-coated, EC) 20 mg + Domperidone (sustained release, SR) 30 mg capsule treatment according to the investigator's discretion were eligible for enrolment in the study.

METHODS

Fixed dose combination of Rabeprazole (enteric-coated, EC) 20 mg + Domperidone (sustained release, SR) 30 mg capsule treatment was given for a total duration of 90 days and efficacy was assessed by the change in RFS and RSI score at Day 90. The safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by monitoring adverse events, vital signs and physical examination.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 patients were enrolled and completed the study. After 12 weeks of fixed dose combination of Rabeprazole (enteric-coated, EC) 20 mg + Domperidone (sustained release, SR) 30 mg capsule treatment there was a significant change in mean RSI scores [mean (SD) RSI: 19.18 (3.24) at baseline to 2.52 (2.31) at end of study; (p<0.0001)] as well as mean RFS score [mean (SD) RFS: 12.62 (1.48) at baseline to 0.30 (0.51) at end of study; (p<0.0001)]. No adverse event was reported by any patient during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Twelve weeks of treatment with combination of fixed dose combination of Rabeprazole (enteric-coated, EC) 20 mg + Domperidone (sustained release, SR) 30 mg capsule significantly improved reflux symptoms in patients with LPR. The combination was found to be safe and well tolerated.

Responder Definition of a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Based on the US FDA Guidance

BACKGROUND

Different end-point measures may contribute to inconsistent therapeutic responses in relief of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine an a priori responder definition for a patient-reported outcome instrument, the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), using an anchor-based method, to interpret individual treatment benefit in patients with LPR, on the basis of the US Food and Drug Administration guidance.

METHODS

Patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms suggestive of LPR underwent twice-daily 40 mg esomeprazole treatment for 12 weeks. We used a 50% or more reduction in the primary laryngeal symptom at week 12, an empirical criterion, as an anchor to dichotomize the participants into two groups, and to establish a responder definition of the RSI score change. The optimal cutoff point of the RSI score change was determined on the basis of the maximal Youden index of the receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The mean reduction in the RSI score was significantly greater in subjects with a 50% or more reduction in the primary laryngeal symptom than in those without (-11.0 ± 7.8 vs. -3.1 ± 8.3, P < 0.0001). A reduction of six points or more in the RSI score at week 12 was considered to be the responder definition with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.70.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an a priori responder definition derived from an empirical criterion according to the Food and Drug Administration guidance: a reduction of six points or more in the RSI score at week 12. This preliminary estimate provides a clinically meaningful change at an individual level, although additional studies and validations across various languages are required.

[The therapeutic effect of proton pump inhibitor on alleviation of hoarseness symptoms in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the therapeutic effect of proton pump inhibitor(PPI) on alleviation of hoarseness symptoms in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR).

METHOD

The LPR outpatients in ENT department of our hospital(60 cases)complained of hoarseness were enrolled in the study from August of 2013 to October of 2014. All of them were randomly divided into group A and B. The individuals in group A (30 cases) taked golden voice capsule to treat for 3 months, while the individuals in group B (30 cases) taked golden voice capsule and omeprazole to treat for 3 months. The data about reflux symptom index (RSI), reflux finding score (RFS) and voice handicap index (VHI)from the first month to the third month after treatment were recorded and compared group A with group B.

RESULT

The scores of RSI and RFS in patients (60 cases) before treatment were significantly correlated with their VHI (r=0. 823, P<0. 01; r=0. 873, P<0. 01). The score changes of RSI and VHI from the first to the third month after treatment in group B were significantly higher than those in group A (P<0. 01). Meanwhile, the score changes of RFS from the third month after treatment in group B were significantly higher than those in group A (t=8. 307, P<. 01), but the differences were not significant for RFS from the first to the second month after treatment between group A and group B(t=1. 128, P>0. 05; t=0. 376, P> 0. 05).

CONCLUSION

PPI therapy could significantly alleviate the hoarseness symptom in LPR patients.

New aspects in the pathomechanism and diagnosis of the laryngopharyngeal reflux-clinical impact of laryngeal proton pumps and pharyngeal pH metry in extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To determine the laryngeal H+K+-ATPase and pharyngeal pH in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)-symptoms as well as to assess the symptom scores during PPI therapy.

METHODS: Endoscopy was performed to exclude neoplasia and to collect biopsies from the posterior cricoid area (immunohistochemistry and PCR analysis). Immunohistochemical staining was performed with monoclonal mouse antibodies against human H+K+-ATPase. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR for each of the H+K+-ATPase subunits was performed. The pH values were assessed in the aerosolized environment of the oropharynx (DxpH Catheter) and compared to a subsequently applied combined pH/MII measurement.

RESULTS: Twenty patients with LPR symptoms were included. In only one patient, the laryngeal H+K+-ATPase was verified by immunohistochemical staining. In another patient, real-time RT-PCR for each H+K+-ATPase subunit was positive. Fourteen out of twenty patients had pathological results in DxpH, and 6/20 patients had pathological results in pH/MII. Four patients had pathological results in both functional tests. Nine out of twenty patients responded to PPIs.

CONCLUSION: The laryngeal H+K+-ATPase can only be sporadically detected in patients with LPR symptoms and is unlikely to cause the LPR symptoms. Alternative hypotheses for the pathomechanism are needed. The role of pharyngeal pH-metry remains unclear and its use can only be recommended for patients in a research study setting.

[Observation the clinical curative effect of children's laryngopharyngeal reflux and sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome]

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical curative effect of anti-reflux treatment for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in children.

METHODS

Twenty children with sleep-disordered breathing were included in this study. There were 15 males and 5 females, aged 3-9 years old, median 6 years old. The electronic laryngoscope, polysomnography (PSG) monitoring, Reflux symptom index (RSI) questionnaire and Reflux finding score (RFS) were used to establish the initial diagnosis of OSAHS with LPRD, preclude adenoid hypertrophy and tonsil hypertrophy and nasal disorders. Oral Domperidone and Omeprazole were given for treatment. For children under 3-year-old, the dosage of Domperidone was 0.6 ml.kg⁻¹.day⁻¹.For children over 3-year-old, Domperidone combined with Omeprazole were given with the dosage of 0.3 mg.kg⁻¹.day⁻¹.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, 19 patients symptoms of OSAHS include disturbed sleep, dyspnoea and apneic attack improved. After 8 weeks of treatment, 20 cases with OSAHS symptoms improved than before treatment. Under the electronic laryngoscope, the decrease in pharyngeal lymphoid follicles, the epiglottis, aryepiglottic fold and scoop intergenic region erythema shallow, edema lessened. After treatment of 4 weeks and 8 weeks, there was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before and after treatment, the difference of RFS was statistically significant (P < 0.05); PSG monitoring proved significant effect in 3 cases (15.0%), effective in 11 cases (55.0%) and 6 cases were ineffective (30.0%). Twenty patients with obstructive apnea index change was not obvious (P > 0.05), apnea hypopnea index and lowest artery oxygen saturation better, differences were statistically significant (Z of 2.819 and 2.733 respectively, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of LPRD can improve the symptoms of OSAHS, these two diseases may coexist in mutual relations.

Rikkunshito improves globus sensation in patients with proton-pump inhibitor-refractory laryngopharyngeal reflux

AIM: To investigate the effect of rikkunshito on laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms and gastric emptying in patients with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory LPR.

METHODS: In total, 22 patients with LPR were enrolled. Following a 2-wk treatment with PPI monotherapy, PPI-refractory LPR patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups (rikkunshito alone or rikkunshito plus the PPI, lansoprazole). LPR symptoms were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) score, gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), and gastric emptying was assessed using the radio-opaque marker method prior to and 4 wk following treatments.

RESULTS: The 4-wk treatment with rikkunshito alone and with rikkunshito plus the PPI significantly decreased the globus sensation VAS scores. The VAS score for sore throat was significantly decreased following treatment with rikkunshito plus PPI but not by rikkunshito alone. Neither treatment significantly changed the GSRS scores. Rikkunshito improved delayed gastric emptying. We found a significant positive correlation between improvements in globus sensation and in gastric emptying (r² = 0.4582, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Rikkunshito improved globus sensation in patients with PPI-refractory LPR, in part, because of stimulation of gastric emptying. Thus, rikkunshito is an effective treatment for PPI-refractory LPR.

The effect of N-acetyl cysteine on laryngopharyngeal reflux

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which the stomach contents go up into the pharynx and then down into the larynx. LPR causes a wide spectrum of manifestations mainly related to the upper and the lower respiratory system such as laryngitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cough, hoarseness, postnasal drip disease, sinusitis, otitis media, recurrent pneumonia, laryngeal cancer and etc. The object of this study was to examine the effect of N-acetyl Cysteine (NAC) with and without Omeprazole on laryngitis and LPR. Ninety patients with laryngitis or its symptoms were referred and randomly assigned into three groups. The first group was treated by Omeprazole and NAC. The second group was treated by Omeprazole and placebo and the last group was treated by NAC and placebo. Duration of treatment was 3 months and all patients were evaluated at the beginning of study, one month and three month after treatment of sign and symptoms, based on reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflex finding score (RFS). Based on the results of this study, despite therapeutic efficacy of all treatment protocols, the RSI before and after 3 months treatment had significant difference in (NAS+ Omeprazole) and (Omeprazole+ placebo) group (P<0.001 in the first group, P<0.001 in the second group and P=0.35 in the third group). Whereas RFS before and after 3 month treatment had significant difference in all groups. (P<0.001 in each group in comparison with itself) but this results had not significant difference after 1 month treatment. Our results showed that the combination therapy with Omeprazole and NAC treatment had the most effect on both subjective and objective questionnaire at least after 3 months treatment. Based on the results of the present study, it seems that the use objective tools are more accurate than subjective tools in evaluation of therapeutic effects in patients with GERD-related laryngitis.

[Laryngopharyngeal reflux as a possible cause of adenoiditis in adult patients]

The objective of the present study was to attract attention of practitioners to the possibility of involvement of pharyngel tonsils in the pathological process in the patients presenting with gastroesophageal reflux. Two clinical cases are reported to illustrate the possibility of development of adenoid vegetations in the adult subjects with laryngopharyngeal reflux. The use of the omeprazole test and the treatment with proton pump inhibitors produced the favourable outcome (adenoid regression) without the application of intranasl corticosteroids and the surgical intervention.

First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is still challenging. Recently a diagnostic device for pH values in the aerosolized environment of the pharynx has been introduced (Dx-pH). We evaluated results of Dx-pH with objective criteria of pH/impedance monitoring (MII) and subjective reflux scoring systems and assessed day-to-day variability.

DESIGN

This study makes use of a prospective single-center trial. Thirty patients with suspected LPR were analyzed. Upper endoscopic examination, manometry, phoniatric examination, and reflux scores were assessed. Dx-pH was performed on two consecutive days, first in combination with MII and second as single measurement. Thereafter, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial was performed. Patients were interviewed about symptom relief after 3 months.

RESULTS

There were considerable differences between MII and results on Dx-pH: day 1 (agreement 11 out of 30, kappa 0.137) and day 2 (agreement 14 out of 30, kappa 0.036). Statistically significant differences were detected correlating all single reflux episodes (n = 453) of Dx-pH with MII and vice versa. Furthermore acidic reflux episodes did not result in pH drops of the pharynx. There was a fair agreement between Dx-pH measurements on subsequent days. After follow-up, 3 out of 18 patients with pathological Dx-pH results reported positive response to PPIs, in contrast to 5 out of 6 patients with pathological MII.

CONCLUSION

According to our data, acid pharyngeal pH levels detected with Dx-pH are not related to GERD and acid esophageal reflux episodes do not result in pharyngeal pH alterations. Hence, present etiology of LPR needs to be reconsidered since neither mixed nor gas reflux events result in pharyngeal pH alteration. Other acid-producing or retaining factors should be taken into account.

Treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a comparison between domperidone plus omeprazole and omeprazole alone

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of domperidone in combination with omeprazole in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) compare to omeprazole alone.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective and randomized study included seventy patients with a reflux symptom index (RSI) 13 or more. They received either domperidone 10 mg thrice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg twice daily or omeprazole alone for three months. RSI was assessed at baseline and after three months of treatment.

RESULTS

Total RSI as well as several subscores were comparable between groups before the treatment. After three months of the treatment, moderate improvement of total RSI was shown in both groups (72.7%, 67.5%). The reduction of total RSI and individual subscores were statistically significant within each group (p < 0.001 each). Comparing between each treatment group, the mean difference of total RSI and individual subscores did not shown any statistically differences (p > 0.05 each) at the end of the study period.

CONCLUSION

Domperidone in combination with omeprazole is not superior to omeprazole alone in the treatment of LPR.

Effects of proton pump inhibitors in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is not well known. Our aim was to assess the HRQoL before and after administration of a PPI in patients with LPRD.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 27 LPRD patients (14 women, 13 men; mean age 54 years) were enrolled. We determined the HRQoL using three different inquiry systems: 1) Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG); 2) the 36 item short form of the Medical Outcome Study Questionnaire (SF-36); and 3) the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). The HRQoL was determined at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment with lansoprazole at a dose of 30mg once daily or rabeprazole at a dose of 10mg once daily.

RESULTS

After administration of the PPI, the FSSG, the SF-36 general health scale and mental health scale, GSRS reflux syndrome score, abdominal pain syndrome score and the indigestion syndrome score were significantly improved compared to baseline pretreatment scores (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PPI therapy would be useful for the treatment of LPRD.

[Diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

METHOD

Patients suspect of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in our out-patient department from Jan 2008 to Jan 2009 were included in this study. All patients were assessed using the reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS). The positive criteria of RSI was score > 13 and that of RFS was score > 7. Fifty-eight double positive patients accepted omeprazole oral administration. After continuous oral administration for three months, all patients received RSI and RFS assessment again.

RESULT

After treatment, the symptoms of 41 patients were significantly alleviated. In addition, RSI were positive in 41 cases and RFS were positive in 37 cases. Thirty-seven cases were double positive.

CONCLUSION

The RSI and RFS could serve as an effective assessment method and could accurately document treatment efficacy in patients with LPR. Proton pump inhibitor such as omeprazole is an effective treatment for patients with LPR.

[Evaluation of efficacy of esomeprazole treatment in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy with esomeprazole on laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by pepsin immunoassay in the sputum.

METHOD

From June 2009 to March 2010, patients in the ENT outpatient department of Nanfang hospital with a reflux finding score (RFS) >7 and a reflux symptom index (RSI) >13 were selected. Their sputum was obtained in the morning for pepsin assay. Twenty-six patients with positive results of pepsin assay were enrolled and received esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily for two months. They paid return visits every two weeks. RSI, RFS and pepsin concentration in the sputum were assessed at baseline and after two months. Pepsin in the sputum was measured by enzyme linked immunoadsorbent assay.

RESULT

After 8 weeks, 24 patients got symptom improvements except 2. All got improved results of laryngoscope exams. RSI and RFS scores before and after PPI treatment reached statistical signification by paired t-test (t= 8.152, P<0.01; t=9.704, P<0.01). 21 patients' pepsin concentrations decreased except 5. Nonparametric tests were used because the reduction of pepsin concentrations before and after PPI treatment were not normally distributed (Z=-3.213, P<0.01). Reductions of total RSI and RFS scores as well as pepsin concentrations were significantly higher after two months.

CONCLUSION

Twice-daily PPI treatment for two months demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in laryngeal appearance and LPR symptoms for most patients in this study, which can result in significantly decreased levels of pepsin in sputum.

Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

The role of proton pump inhibitor in the treatment of laryngopharygneal reflux disease (LPRD) has been advocated, but there has been few reports dealing with large population based on time-related efficacy of rabeprazole. It was designed to assess the efficacy of rabeprazole and to evaluate which symptoms or findings varied significantly as medication sustained. Multiorgan, open-label cohort, prospective observational study was designed. We identified 1,142 patients with LPRD, and enrolled 455 patients, who participated fully in this survey and follow-up observation for 12 weeks. Reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) were used to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. These parameters were evaluated at the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks, respectively. Valid rate was used to explain improved proportion of patients after medication. The most common symptom was a globus sense in the throat. Posterior commissure hypertrophy was the most frequently encountered laryngoscopic finding. Female patients complained of heartburn and chest pain more than did male patients (P < 0.001), whereas male patients showed ventricular obliteration and erythematous changes more frequently than did female patients (P < 0.001). By RSI evaluation, scores gradually declined. Each item of the RSI improved at every visit (P < 0.001). Total RFS decreased progressively for 12 weeks and similar results were seen when every RFS item was individually examined. The proportion of patients who showed RSI and RFS falling by more than 50% after medication increased gradually as follow-up continued. This trend seemed to be significant (P < 0.001). Side effects of therapy were minimal. Despite the some constraints of an observational study, rabeprazole appeared to improve LPRD symptoms and signs. Prolonged medication at least 3 months may be beneficial to LPRD patients. Long-term medication effects require further evaluation.

Comparative outcomes of antireflux treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms and upper abdominal symptoms in patients with endoscopic esophagitis

The objectives of this prospective study are to determine the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms in patients with endoscopic esophagitis, to investigate the relationship between LPR symptoms and upper abdominal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to compare the treatment responses of both symptom groups. 120 consecutive patients having complaints of GERD were included. Group I consisted of 62 patients with a diagnosis of endoscopic esophagitis. The second group consisted of 58 subjects with no detectable pathology at gastroscopy. LPR symptoms and upper abdominal symptoms were graded. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were prescribed to patients. Both groups of symptoms were compared in two groups of patients. The improvement in symptoms was evaluated after treatment. The frequencies of LPR symptoms were statistically higher in patients with endoscopic esophagitis. All LPR symptoms were statistically relieved in their frequency after treatment. The decrease in LPR symptom scores after treatment in group I was statistically significant. FSSG (frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD) scores were statistically higher in group I than in group II before treatment. After treatment, FSSG scores were significantly decreased in group I. There was statistically significant positive correlation between the LPR symptom scores and FSSG scores before treatment. In conclusion, there is a high incidence of LPR symptoms and upper abdominal symptoms in patients with endoscopic esophagitis. LPR and upper abdominal symptoms responded well to antireflux treatment in patients with endoscopic esophagitis.