Use of metabolic syndrome severity to assess treatment with vitamin E and pioglitazone for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Polyphenols synergistic drugs to ameliorate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via signal pathway and gut microbiota: A review

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic liver disease with an increasing incidence worldwide. Single drug therapy may have toxic side effects and disrupt gut microbiota balance. Polyphenols are widely used in disease intervention due to their distinctive nutritional properties and medicinal value, which a potential gut microbiota modulator. However, there is a lack of comprehensive review to explore the efficacy and mechanism of combined therapy with drugs and polyphenols for NAFLD.

AIM OF REVIEW

Based on this, this review firstly discusses the link between NAFLD and gut microbiota, and outlines the effects of polyphenols and drugs on gut microbiota. Secondly, it examined recent advances in the treatment and intervention of NAFLD with drugs and polyphenols and the therapeutic effect of the combination of the two. Finally, we highlight the underlying mechanisms of polyphenol combined drug therapy in NAFLD. This is mainly in terms of signaling pathways (NF-κB, AMPK, Nrf2, JAK/STAT, PPAR, SREBP-1c, PI3K/Akt and TLR) and gut microbiota. Furthermore, some emerging mechanisms such as microRNA potential biomarker therapies may provide therapeutic avenues for NAFLD.

KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW

Drawing inspiration from combination drug strategies, the use of active substances in combination with drugs for NAFLD intervention holds transformative and prospective potential, both improve NAFLD and restore gut microbiota balance while reducing the required drug dosage. This review systematically discusses the bidirectional interactions between gut microbiota and NAFLD, and summarizes the potential mechanisms of polyphenol synergistic drugs in the treatment of NAFLD by modulating signaling pathways and gut microbiota. Future researches should develop multi-omics technology to identify patients who benefit from polyphenols combination drugs and devising individualized treatment plans to enhance its therapeutic effect.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disease that affects approximately one-quarter of the global adult population, posing a significant threat to human health with wide-ranging social and economic implications. The main characteristic of NAFLD is considered that the excessive fat is accumulated and deposited in hepatocytes without excess alcohol intake or some other pathological causes. NAFLD is a progressive disease, ranging from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, and death. Therefore, NAFLD will probably emerge as the leading cause of end-stage liver disease in the coming decades. Unlike other highly prevalent diseases, NAFLD has received little attention from the global public health community. Liver biopsy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of NAFLD because of the absence of noninvasive and specific biomarkers. Due to the complex pathophysiological mechanisms of NAFLD and the heterogeneity of the disease phenotype, no specific pharmacological therapies have been approved for NAFLD at present, although several drugs are in advanced stages of development. This review summarizes the current evidence on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD.

Response to pioglitazone in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with vs. without type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Pioglitazone is considered a potential therapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, different effects of pioglitazone on NAFLD have been demonstrated in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Herein, a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials was carried out to indirectly compare pioglitazone in NAFLD patients with vs. without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pioglitazone vs. placebo involving NAFLD patients with or without type 2 diabetes/prediabetes collected from databases were enrolled into this analysis. Methodological quality was employed to evaluate the domains recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The analysis covered the changes in histology (fibrosis, hepatocellular ballooning, inflammation, steatosis), liver enzymes, blood lipids, fasting blood glucose (FBS), homeostasis model assessment-IR (HOMA-IR), weight and body mass index (BMI) before and after treatment, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The review covered seven articles, with 614 patients in total, of which three were non-diabetic RCTs. No difference was found in patients with vs. without type 2 diabetes in histology, liver enzymes, blood lipids, HOMA-IR, weight, BMI, and FBS. Moreover, no significant difference was revealed in adverse effects between NAFLD patients with diabetes and without DM, except the incidence of edema that was found to be higher in the pioglitazone group than in the placebo group in NAFLD patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone could exert a certain effect on alleviating NAFLD, which was consistent between non-diabetic NAFLD patients and diabetic NAFLD patients in improving histopathology, liver enzymes, and HOMA-IR and reducing blood lipids. Furthermore, there were no adverse effects, except the incidence of edema which is higher in the pioglitazone group in NAFLD patients with diabetes. However, large sample sizes and well-designed RCTs are required to further confirm these conclusions.

Efficacy of Off-Label Therapy for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Improving Non-invasive and Invasive Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To evaluate the effects of vitamin E, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Design

A network meta-analysis.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception until September 1, 2021.

Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of four different drugs in patients with NAFLD were included. All superiority, non-inferiority, phase II and III, non-blinded, single-blinded, and double-blinded trials were included. Interventions of interest included vitamin E (α-tocopherol and δ-tocotrienol), pioglitazone, three kinds of GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide), four SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, and tofogliflozin), and comparisons of these different drugs, and placebos.

Main Outcome Measures

The outcome measures included changes in non-invasive tests [alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, liver fat content (LFC), and keratin-18 (K-18)] and invasive tests [fibrosis score and resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)].

Results

Twenty-seven trials including 3,416 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Results refer to vitamin E, pioglitazone, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors. First, placebos were used as a reference. δ-Tocotrienol was superior to placebo in decreasing the GGT level. Semaglutide, ipragliflozin, and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the ALT level than a placebo. Semaglutide, pioglitazone, and dapagliflozin were superior to placebo in decreasing the AST level. Tofogliflozin and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the K-18 level than a placebo. Liraglutide was superior to placebo in decreasing CAP. Liraglutide, pioglitazone, and vitamin E induced a significantly higher increase in resolution of NASH than a placebo. As for pairwise comparisons, semaglutide and pioglitazone were superior to liraglutide in decreasing the ALT level. Semaglutide induced a significantly higher decrease in the ALT level than dulaglutide. Semaglutide was obviously superior to empagliflozin, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and tofogliflozin in decreasing the AST level. Pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the GGT level than ipragliflozin. δ-Tocotrienol was superior to liraglutide in decreasing the GGT level. Tofogliflozin and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the K-18 level than dulaglutide. Pioglitazone was superior to vitamin E in increasing the resolution of NASH. Furthermore, liraglutide treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing CAP and ELF scores and increasing the resolution of NASH. Pioglitazone treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing LFC and fibrosis scores. Tofogliflozin treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing K-18, while dapagliflozin treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing the GGT level. Semaglutide treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing the levels of ALT and AST.

Conclusion

The network meta-analysis provided evidence for the efficacy of vitamin E, pioglitazone, SGLT2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists in treating patients with NAFLD. To find the best guide-level drugs, it is necessary to include more RCTs with these off-label drugs, so that patients and clinicians can make optimal decisions together.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42021283129.

Severity of metabolic syndrome is greater among nonalcoholic adults with elevated ALT and advanced fibrosis

The obesity epidemic has increased risk for nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. We hypothesized that metabolic syndrome (MetS) severity would correlate with markers of NAFLD and NASH fibrosis. We evaluated cross-sectional data from 5463 participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2012, age 20 to 64 years with and without diabetes, excluding those with heavy drinking and infectious liver serologies. We used linear and logistic regression to evaluate links between MetS-severity (using a race/ethnicity-specific MetS-severity-Z-score, MetS-Z) and apparent NALFD sequelae, using elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) to determine presence of NAFLD and elevated NAFLD Fibrosis Score to identify advanced fibrosis (NASH Clinical Research Network scoring stage 3-4). The prevalence of unexplained ALT elevations and advanced fibrosis were 11.4% and 1.37%, respectively. MetS-Z-scores were higher among those with elevated ALT (0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6, 0.8) and advanced fibrosis (1.7, CI: 1.5,1.9), compared to those without liver abnormalities (0.2, CI:0.2, 0.3). For every 1-standard-deviation unit increase in MetS-Z, there were higher odds of elevated ALT (OR = 1.58, CI: 1.44, 1.72) and advanced fibrosis (OR = 1.96, CI: 1.77, 2.18), with some attenuation after adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and diabetes status. Significant differences were noted by race/ethnicity, with stronger links among whites versus blacks. The degree of MetS-severity was associated with progressive increase in apparent NAFLD and advanced fibrosis; as MetS-severity has also been linked to future cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, this provides support for use of a MetS-severity score to screen for general health, with high levels triggering further assessment for liver abnormalities.