|
1
|
Paramythiotis D, Karlafti E, Tsavdaris D, Arvanitakis K, Protopapas AA, Germanidis G, Kougias L, Hatzidakis A, Savopoulos C, Michalopoulos A. Comparative Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies vs. Percutaneous Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3108. [PMID: 38892819 PMCID: PMC11172871 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth deadliest form of cancer. However, it is essential to note that not all pancreatic masses signal primary malignancy. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the correct differential diagnosis, a process further supported by pre-operative biopsy procedures. This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic performance of two minimally invasive biopsy approaches for pancreatic tissue sampling: percutaneous biopsies guided by computed tomography or ultrasound, and transduodenal biopsies guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The included studies analyzed the diagnostic performance of the two biopsy methods, and they were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Statistical analysis was carried out using the RevMan and MetaDisc software packages. Results: The statistical analysis of the results demonstrated the superiority of the percutaneous approach. Specifically, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-and DOR for the percutaneous approach were 0.896 [95% CI: 0.878-0.913], 0.949 [95% CI: 0.892-0.981], 9.70 [95% CI: 5.20-18.09], 0.20 [95% CI: 0.12-0.32] and 68.55 [95% CI: 32.63-143.98], respectively. The corresponding values for EUS-guided biopsies were 0.806 [95% CI: 0.775-0.834], 0.955 [95% CI: 0.926-0.974], 12.04 [95% CI: 2.67-54.17], 0.24 [95% CI: 0.15-0.39] and 52.56 [95% CI: 13.81-200.09], respectively. Nevertheless, it appears that this statistical superiority is also linked to the selection bias favoring larger and hence more readily accessible tumors during percutaneous biopsy procedures. Conclusions: Concisely, our meta-analysis indicates the statistical superiority of the percutaneous approach. However, selecting the optimal biopsy method is complex, influenced by factors like patient and tumor characteristics, clinical resources, and other relevant considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Paramythiotis
- First Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.P.); (D.T.); (A.M.)
| | - Eleni Karlafti
- Emergency Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.A.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Dimitrios Tsavdaris
- First Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.P.); (D.T.); (A.M.)
| | - Konstantinos Arvanitakis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.A.); (G.G.)
| | - Adonis A. Protopapas
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.A.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Georgios Germanidis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.A.); (G.G.)
| | - Leonidas Kougias
- Department of Radiology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.K.); (A.H.)
| | - Adam Hatzidakis
- Department of Radiology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.K.); (A.H.)
| | - Christos Savopoulos
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.A.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Antonios Michalopoulos
- First Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.P.); (D.T.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Iwashita T, Uemura S, Ryuichi T, Senju A, Iwata S, Ohashi Y, Shimizu M. Advances and efficacy in specimen handling for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy: A comprehensive review. DEN OPEN 2024; 4:e350. [PMID: 38495467 PMCID: PMC10941515 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy have significantly evolved since they offer a minimally invasive approach for obtaining pathological specimens from lesions adjacent to or within the intestine. This paper reviews advancements in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy techniques and devices, emphasizing the importance of handling specimens for diagnostic accuracy. Innovations of fine needle biopsy needles with features like side holes and Franseen shapes have enhanced histological sampling capabilities. Techniques for specimen handling, including rapid on-site evaluation and macroscopic on-site evaluation, play pivotal roles in assessing sample adequacy, thereby influencing diagnostic outcomes. The utility of artificial intelligence in augmenting rapid on-site evaluation and macroscopic on-site evaluation, although still in experimental stages, presents a promising avenue for improving procedural efficiency and diagnostic precision. The choice of specimen handling technique is dependent on various factors including endoscopist preference, procedure objectives, and available resources, underscoring the need for a comprehensive understanding of each method's characteristics to optimize diagnostic efficacy and procedural safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| | - Shinya Uemura
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| | - Tezuka Ryuichi
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| | - Akihiko Senju
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| | - Shota Iwata
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| | - Yosuke Ohashi
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| | - Masahito Shimizu
- First Department of Internal MedicineGifu University HospitalGifuJapan
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Bor R, Vasas B, Fábián A, Szűcs M, Bősze Z, Bálint A, Rutka M, Farkas K, Tóth T, Resál T, Bacsur P, Molnár T, Szepes Z. Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2841. [PMID: 37685379 PMCID: PMC10486755 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inconclusive cytological findings of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remain a major clinical challenge and often lead to treatment delays. METHODS Patients who had undergone EUS-FNA sampling for solid pancreas lesions between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The "atypical" and "non-diagnostic" categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System were considered inconclusive and the "negative for malignancy" category of malignancy was suspected clinically. We determined the frequency and predictors of inconclusive cytological finding. RESULTS A total of 473 first EUS-FNA samples were included, of which 108 cases (22.83%) were inconclusive. Significant increases in the odds of inconclusive cytological findings were observed for lesions with a benign final diagnosis (OR 11.20; 95% CI 6.56-19.54, p < 0.001) as well as with the use of 25 G FNA needles (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.09-4.01, p = 0.023) compared to 22 G needles. Furthermore, the use of a single EUS-FNA technique compared to the combined use of slow-pull and standard suction techniques (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06-2.70, p = 0.027) and less than three punctures per procedure led to an elevation in the risk of inconclusive cytology (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.49-4.14, p < 0.001). Risk reduction in inconclusive cytology findings was observed in lesions between 2-4 cm (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23-0.68, p = 0.001) and >4 cm (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08-0.31, p < 0.001) compared to lesions ≤2 cm. CONCLUSIONS The more than two punctures per EUS-FNA sampling with larger-diameter needle (19 G or 22 G) using the slow-pull and standard suction techniques in combination may decrease the probability of inconclusive cytological findings.
Collapse
Grants
- K125377 to TM, K134863 to KF, K143549 to TM National Research, Development and Innovation Office
- UNKP-20-5-SZTE-161 to KF, UNKP-22-3-SZTE-233 to PB, UNKP-22-5-SZTE-545 to RB, UNKP-22-4-SZTE-296 to AF, UNKP-22-3-SZTE-278 to TR New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary
- BO/00723/22 to RB Janos Bolyai Research Grant, Hungary
- Géza Hetényi Research Grant by Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renáta Bor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Béla Vasas
- Department of Pathology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Anna Fábián
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Mónika Szűcs
- Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zsófia Bősze
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Anita Bálint
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Mariann Rutka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Tibor Tóth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Tamás Resál
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Péter Bacsur
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Tamás Molnár
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Zoltán Szepes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Liu Y, Xiong D, Zhao Y, Meng Z, Wu X, Jiang Q, Wang Q, Wu D, Zhang S, Feng Y, Yang A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:1185-1193. [PMID: 37114616 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2204985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) by EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) or fine needle biopsy (FNB) is a standard diagnostic procedure for solid pancreatic lesions. Whether rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) should be used to support EUS-TA remains controversial. Here we assessed the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA with or without self-ROSE for solid pancreatic masses. METHODS Three hundred and seventy EUS-TA cases with self-ROSE and 244 cases without ROSE were retrospectively enrolled between August 2018 and June 2022. All procedures including ROSE were performed by the attending endoscopist. Clinical data, EUS characteristics, and diagnostic performance for distinguishing benign from malignant solid pancreatic masses including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared between groups. RESULTS Self-ROSE improved the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions by 16.7% in the EUS-TA group (p < 0.001) and by 18.9% in the EUS-FNA alone group (p < 0.001). Self-ROSE also improved the diagnostic sensitivity by 18.6% in the EUS-TA group (p < 0.001) and by 21.2% in the EUS-FNA alone group (p < 0.001). Improvements in the diagnostic accuracy by self-ROSE in the EUS-FNB group were not significant. 2.2 ± 0.7, 2.4 ± 0.9, 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.5 ± 0.9, 2.1 ± 0.6, and 2.1 ± 0.7 needle passes were required in the EUS-TA, EUS-FNA, and EUS-FNB with or without self-ROSE groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Self-ROSE significantly improved the accuracy and sensitivity of EUS-FNA alone and EUS-TA diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions and helped to reduce needle passes during the procedure. Whether self-ROSE benefits EUS-FNB and whether EUS-FNB alone is comparable to EUS-FNA with self-ROSE require further clarification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongru Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Dingkun Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhilan Meng
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qingwei Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Dongsheng Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shengyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yunlu Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Aiming Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Kundu R, Rana SS, Suneel R, Dey P. EUS-guided FNAC in intra-abdominal lesions: Technique of tissue acquisition, ancillary testing, pearls and perils, and prospects. Diagn Cytopathol 2023. [PMID: 37154168 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound enables visualization of lesions within and in the vicinity of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) helps in targeting various luminal and extraluminal lesions both diagnostically and therapeutically. Various intra-abdominal organs amenable to EUS-FNA include the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), pancreas, kidney, adrenal gland, liver, bile duct, gallbladder, spleen, and lymph nodes. EUS-FNAC is mostly done for pancreatic and intra-abdominal lymph nodal lesions. In the present review, we have discussed various aspects of EUS-FNAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetu Kundu
- Department of Cytology and Gynecologic Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rachagiri Suneel
- Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pranab Dey
- Department of Cytology and Gynecologic Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Poiraud M, Gkolfakis P, Arvanitakis M. Recent Developments in the Field of Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Pancreatic Lesions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092547. [PMID: 37174012 PMCID: PMC10177103 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of both solid and cystic pancreatic lesions and in the staging of patients with pancreatic cancer through its use for tissue and fluid sampling. Additionally, in cases of precancerous lesions, EUS-guided therapy can also be provided. This review aims to describe the most recent developments regarding the role of EUS in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic lesions. Moreover, complementary EUS imaging modalities, the role of artificial intelligence, new devices, and modalities for tissue acquisition, and techniques for EUS-guided treatment are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Poiraud
- Department of Gastroenterology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Ang TL, Wang LM. Rapid on-site evaluation by endoscopists: Another option to improve the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:1837-1838. [PMID: 36190324 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth; Duke-NUS Medical School; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Lai Mun Wang
- Section of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|