Regulatory Measures Expedited Hip Fracture Surgery Without Lowering Overall Patient Mortality

The effect of early surgery on clinical outcomes in proximal femoral fracture patients receiving chronic anticoagulation: A japanese nationwide database study

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is often delayed in patients with proximal femoral fractures who receive oral anticoagulants, to avoid complications related to perioperative bleeding. However, surgery delay may increase the risk of postoperative mortality. Our primary goal was to understand whether anticoagulated patients benefit from early surgery in terms of survival and perioperative complications.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 581,189 patients with proximal femoral fractures. About 2.0 % (n = 11,385) received direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and 1.5 % (n = 8,726) received warfarin. Surgery was performed within 48 h in 37.6 % of DOAC patients, 27.6 % of warfarin patients and in 41.9 % of nonanticoagulated patients. Survival analysis was applied to compare mortality rate, blood transfusions, systemic complications and surgical complications during hospitalization between the study groups.

RESULTS

Patients receiving anticoagulation were older and had more comorbidities than patients without anticoagulation. There were overall similar rates of mortality (0.8 %, 1.1 % and 1.2 %) and surgical complications (2.1 %, 2.1 % and 2.2 %) in non-anticoagulated, DOAC and warfarin patients. Blood transfusions and systemic complications were higher in all anticoagulated patients regardless of surgery timing. There were comparable rates of early surgery (41.9 %, 37.6 % and 27.6 %, respectively). When operated early, DOAC patients had more surgical complications (OR=1.24, p = 0.04). Warfarin patients operated early had higher mortality (OR=1.48, p = 0.08) and higher risk of blood transfusions (OR=1.24, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Age and comorbidities could explain higher rates of postoperative systemic complications in anticoagulated patients. Nevertheless, overall short-term mortality was similar between the groups. Early surgery was associated with higher rates of surgical complications in DOAC patients. When operated early, patients receiving warfarin were at an increased risk of mortality (p = 0.08) and perioperative blood transfusions.

Would giving priority in surgery timing to the oldest patients result in lower mortality?

PURPOSE

Early hip fracture surgery in elderly patients is recognized as a positive prognostic factor. When applied as an intervention, it does not always reduce overall patient mortality. A plausible explanation for this is that not all patients equally benefit from early surgery. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of early surgery on mortality in patients ages 80 and older.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort of 3463 patients with hip fractures, operated upon within seven days of admission in a tertiary medical center between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into five groups: ages 80-84, 85-89, 90-94, 95-99, and 100 or above. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups. Mortality at one year post-operatively as a function of surgery delay was visualized for each group, using restricted spline curve analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with increasing age were operated on earlier, had increased co-morbidities with a higher ASA score and experienced higher mortality. Spline curve analysis in younger patients, ages 80 to 94, demonstrated an inflection point at 48 hours after admission, prior to which mortality was rising rapidly and after which it continued rising slowly. In the two oldest age cohorts, there was no increased mortality with an increasing surgical delay.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients ages 80-94 surgery on day one may be preferable to surgery on day two. In patients ages 95 and older, surgery time did not influence mortality. Pursuit of better patient outcomes may include prioritizing early surgery in younger patients.

Impact of orthogeriatric care management by orthopedic surgeons and physicians on in-hospital clinical outcomes: A difference-in-difference analysis

AIM

The orthopedic surgery unit in our suburb serves a large elderly trauma population in addition to providing elective surgeries. As patients with hip fractures have become older and at higher risk of medical complications, our hospital has initiated integrated co-management of these patients by orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians from the point of hospital admission. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the hospital policy change on hip fracture management and clinical outcome indicators.

METHODS

Using the difference-in-difference approach, in total, 288 consecutive patients with hip fractures treated during the 1 year before and 2 years after transition to orthogeriatric care from a geriatric consultation model to integrated orthogeriatric care model were compared with 576 patients from other local hospitals.

RESULTS

Despite a seasonal trend toward increased length of hospital stay in winter, the intervention significantly reduced the change in mean length of stay (mean difference [95% confidence interval], -12.9 days [-21.5 to -4.3]; P = 0.007) and discharge to home tended to change less frequently (-12.6%; P = 0.10). There was no significant reduction in mean time to surgery (-0.2 days; P = 0.83), mortality (-0.8%; P = 0.62), or complications (-1.0%; P = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Changing our hip fracture service from a geriatric consultation model of care to an integrated orthogeriatric model significantly reduced length of hospital stay probably due to a lower chance of discharge to home. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Japan to compare two orthogeriatric care models considering the nationwide improvement in hip fracture management.

AUTHOR

Geriatr Gerontol Int ••; ••: ••-•• Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; ••: ••-••.

Introduction of hospital quality measures may lead to a temporary decrease in patient outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the impact of hospital quality indicators on hip fracture mortality in Israel.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

METHODS

Data were collected on all patients aged ≥65 years with an isolated hip fracture in the years 2010-2016 from the Israel's National Trauma Registry. These data were then cross checked with information on co-morbidities and medication intake from the Clalit medical fund. All successfully matched patients constituted the study population. The main outcome measures were in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Trend analysis of surgery on hip fractures within 48 h of hospitalisation (referred to as early hip fracture surgeries) and mortality was performed. The introduction of the proportion of early hip fracture surgeries as an official quality parameter in 2013 was considered an intervention.

RESULTS

The proportion of early hip fracture surgeries continuously increased during the study period and, after the introduction of the quality measure, a significant increase in the uniformity of practice among hospitals was observed. The mortality trend was not related to the early surgeries trend, with a sharp upward spike detected in 2014, followed by a gradual return to previous levels in the subsequent years. The analysis has shown that when adjusting for demographic factors and co-morbidity, both in 2010-2013 and in 2015-2016, a clear benefit in survival existed for patients who were operated on within the first 48 h. In 2014, which was the first year of open publication of achieved quality measures reported in the media, no such benefit was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when an improvement in a promoted practice is achieved, its positive impact on clinical outcomes may be delayed, possibly indicating the need for a learning period.

Hip fracture surgery within 36 hours reduces both 30-day and 1-year mortality rates

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Currently the Irish Hip Fracture Standards [IHFS] recommend a Time-to-Surgery [TTS] of within 48 h of admission. The aim of our research is to determine if there was a statistically significant relationship between TTS and 30-day or one-year mortality and to assess whether a 48 h window for surgery is still the most appropriate recommendation.

METHODS USED

This was a single-hospital retrospective review of all of the fragility hip fractures between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2017. Patient demographics were described using descriptive statistics. Dependent variables of interest were 30-day mortality and one-year mortality. Independent predictor variables analysed included age, ASA grade, fracture type, surgery performed, anaesthesia administered, length of stay and TTS (hours as an interval variable), TTS in less than 36 h (binary variable) and TTS in less than 48 h (binary variable). When the significant predictor variables were identified, in order to control for confounder variables, a multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify which predictors were still significantly associated with the outcome variables even after controlling for all other known confounder variables.

RESULTS

In total, 806 patients were identified. TTS within 36 h was predictive of a significantly lower 30-day mortality when compared to those undergoing surgery after 36 h (p = 0.031). In contrast, TTS within 48 h did not demonstrate a significantly lower 30-day mortality when compared to those undergoing surgery after 48 h (p = 0.104). On multivariate regression analysis, TTS <36 h (p = 0.011) and age (p < 0.0001) were all independently predictive of 30-day mortality. On multivariate regression analysis, both age (p < 0.0001) and TTS < 36 h (p = 0.002) were significantly predictive of one-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

Performing hip fracture surgery within 36 h confers a significant reduction in both 30-day and one-year mortality rates when compared to patients undergoing surgery outside of this time frame. A 36-h window also appears to be superior to a 48-h window because performing surgery within 48 h has no significant impact on the reduction of 30-day mortality rates. We recommend that national guidelines reflect these important findings.

National study: Most elderly patients benefit from earlier hip fracture surgery despite co-morbidity

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the potential influence of pre-operative patient condition on the benefit of earlier hip fracture surgery for elderly patients.

BACKGROUND

Many studies emphasize the benefit of earlier hip fracture surgery for patient survival. However less is known regarding how this relationship is influenced by clinical factors which could serve as potential contra-indicators for earlier surgery. Rushed surgery of patients with contra-indications may even compromise their survival.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients aged 65 and above with an isolated hip fracture following trauma, based on data from 19 hospitals of the national trauma registry available for the years 2015-2016. Registry data was crossed with data on co-morbidities and medication intake from the biggest health insurance agency in the country, serving more than 50% of the country's population. Mediation analysis was performed on a wide list of co-morbidities, medications and clinical test results in order to establish the mediation of their relationship with inhospital mortality by earlier hip fracture surgery. Factors found significant in the mediation analysis were utilized to adjust a logistic regression for predicting inhospital mortality by function of waiting time to surgery and patient's sex and age.

RESULTS

Anti-coagulant and anti-platelet intake; test results pointing to decreased kidney function and being diagnosed with diabetes or Ischemic Heart Disease were found to be significantly mediated in their influence on inhospital mortality by hip fracture surgery. Despite anti-platelet intake and kidney function having a significant impact on mortality in the multi-variate analysis, the positive effect of earlier hip surgery on survival remained unchanged after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier hip fracture surgery was found to be beneficial for elderly patients even when their co-morbidities and medication intake are taken into account.