Comparison of supine and seated orthostatic hypotension assessments and their association with falls and orthostatic symptoms

The effect of a change in antihypertensive treatment on orthostatic hypotension in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is common in older adults with hypertension. Antihypertensive treatment (AHT) prevents cardio- and cerebrovascular events. However, physicians are concerned to cause OH, making them hesitant to initiate or augment AHT in older adults with hypertension.

METHODS

We systematically researched electronic databases for trials with older participants (≥65 years) with hypertension and OH assessment after initiating, discontinuing, or augmenting AHT. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analyses on OH prevalence and postural blood pressure (BP) drop were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (26,695 participants) met inclusion criteria, of which fifteen could be included in the meta-analyses. OH prevalence decreased after AHT initiation or augmentation (risk ratio 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.21-0.72; I2 = 47 %; p < 0.01), n = 6 studies), but also after AHT discontinuation (risk ratio 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.28-0.55; I2 = 0 %; p < 0.01), n = 2 studies). Postural BP drop did not change after initiation or augmentation of AHT (mean difference 1.07 (95 % CI = -0.49-2.64; I2 = 92 %; p = 0.18), n = 11 studies). The main reason for ten studies not to be included in the meta-analyses was absence of baseline OH data. Most of these studies reported OH incidences between 0 and 2 %. Studies were heterogeneous in OH assessment methods (postural change, timing of BP measurements, and OH definition). Risk of bias was moderate to serious in twenty studies.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that AHT initiation or augmentation decreases OH prevalence, implying that the risk of inducing OH may be overestimated in current AHT decision-making in older adults. However, the overall low level of evidence and the finding that AHT discontinuation reduces OH prevalence limit firm conclusions at present and highlight an important research gap. Future AHT trials in older adults should measure OH in a standardized protocol, adhering to consensus guidelines to overcome these limitations.

Effect of orthostatic hypotension on long-term prognosis of elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The long-term prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) combined with orthostatic hypotension (OH) has rarely been reported. This research was designed to examine whether OH increases the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death among patients with stable CAD.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed retired military personnel over 65 years of age who were hospitalized at the General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army between March and July 2010. A total of 924 patients with stable CAD were included, among whom 263 had OH. The risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in OH and non-OH groups were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards models, and restricted cubic spline plots were utilized for subgroup analyses. Furthermore, competing risk models were applied for sensitivity analyses.

Results

The median age of the patients was 82.00 (80.00-85.00) years. Over 159 months of follow-up, the loss to follow-up rate was 2.27%, and all-cause mortality was observed in 574 (63.57%) patients, including 184 with OH. Moreover, cardiovascular death occurred in 127 patients (13.73%), with 58 cases associated with OH. Although the relationship between OH and all-cause mortality was non-significant [body mass index (BMI) < 25 group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10 with a 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.40; BMI ≥ 25 group, adjusted HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.98-1.70], it was independently related to a growing risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.20-2.60). This finding was further validated by using a competing risk model (subdistribution HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.22-2.49). Moreover, age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and frequency of hospital admissions were identified as risk factors of cardiovascular death among patients with OH (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study, based on retired military personnel with stable CAD, found that OH led to a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death, but it was not noticeably associated with all-cause mortality on long-term prognosis.

Long-term antipsychotic use, orthostatic hypotension and falls in older adults with Alzheimer's disease

PURPOSE

Antipsychotic use in Alzheimer disease (AD) is associated with adverse events and mortality. Whilst postulated to cause/exacerbate orthostatic hypotension (OH), the exact relationship between antipsychotic use and OH has never been explored in AD-a group who are particularly vulnerable to neuro-cardiovascular instability and adverse effects of medication on orthostatic blood pressure (BP) behaviour.

METHODS

We analysed longitudinal data from an 18-month trial of Nilvadipine in mild-moderate AD. We assessed the effect of long-term antipsychotic use (for the entire 18-month study duration) on orthostatic BP phenotypes measured on eight occasions, in addition to the relationship between antipsychotic use, BP phenotypes and incident falls.

RESULTS

Of 509 older adults with AD (aged 72.9 ± 8.3 years, 61.9% female), 10.6% (n = 54) were prescribed a long-term antipsychotic. Over 18 months, long-term antipsychotic use was associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing sit-to-stand OH (ssOH) (OR: 1.21; 1.05-1.38, p = 0.009) which persisted on covariate adjustment. Following adjustment for important clinical confounders, both antipsychotic use (IRR: 1.80, 1.11-2.92, p = 0.018) and ssOH (IRR: 1.44, 1.00-2.06, p = 0.048) were associated with a greater risk of falls/syncope over 18 months in older adults with mild-moderate AD.

CONCLUSION

Even in mild-to-moderate AD, long-term antipsychotic use was associated with ssOH. Both antipsychotic use and ssOH were associated with a greater risk of incident falls/syncope over 18 months. Further attention to optimal prescribing interventions in this cohort is warranted and may involve screening older adults with AD prescribed antipsychotics for both orthostatic symptoms and falls.

Orthostatic Hypotension in Adults With Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although orthostatic hypotension (OH) has long been recognized as a manifestation of autonomic dysfunction, a growing body of literature has identified OH as a common comorbidity of hypertension. This connection is complex, related to pathophysiology in blood pressure regulation and the manner by which OH is derived as the difference between 2 blood pressure measurements. While traditional therapeutic approaches to OH among patients with neurodegenerative disorders focus on increasing upright blood pressure to prevent cerebral hypoperfusion, the management of OH among patients with hypertension is more nuanced; resting hypertension is itself associated with adverse outcomes among these patients. Although there is substantial evidence that intensive blood pressure treatment does not cause OH in the majority of patients with essential hypertension, some classes of antihypertensive agents may unmask OH in patients with an underlying autonomic impairment. Practical steps to manage OH among adults with hypertension start with (1) a thorough characterization of its patterns, triggers, and cause; (2) review and removal of aggravating factors (often pharmacological agents not related to hypertension treatment); (3) optimization of an antihypertensive regimen; and (4) adoption of a tailored treatment strategy that avoids exacerbating hypertension. These strategies include countermaneuvers and short-acting vasoactive agents (midodrine, droxidopa). Ultimately, further research is needed on the epidemiology of OH, the impact of hypertension treatment on OH, approaches to the screening and diagnosis of OH, and OH treatment among adults with hypertension to improve the care of these patients and their complex blood pressure pathophysiology.

Timing of orthostatic hypotension and its relationship with falls in older adults

BACKGROUND

There is inconsistent evidence on the optimal time after standing to assess for orthostatic hypotension. We determined the prevalence of orthostatic hypotension at different time points after standing in a population of older adults, as well as fall risk and symptoms associated with orthostatic hypotension.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the Study to Understand Fall Reduction and Vitamin D in You (STURDY), a randomized clinical trial funded by the National Institute on Aging, testing the effect of differing vitamin D3 doses on fall risk in older adults. STURDY occurred between July 2015 and May 2019. Secondary analysis occurred in 2022. Participants were community-dwelling adults, 70 years or older. In the orthostatic hypotension assessment, participants stood upright from supine position and underwent six standing blood pressure measurements (M1-M6) in two clusters of three measurements (immediately and 3 min after standing). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the relationship between orthostatic hypotension at each measurement and subsequent falls. Participants were followed until the earlier of their 24-month visit or study completion.

RESULTS

Orthostatic hypotension occurred in 32% of assessments at M1, and only 16% at M5 and M6. Orthostatic hypotension from average immediate (M1-3) and average delayed (M4-6) measurements, respectively, predicted higher fall risk (M1-3 = 1.65 [1.08, 2.52]; M4-6 = 1.73 [1.03, 2.91]) (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]). However, among individual measurements, only orthostatic hypotension at M5 (1.84 [1.16, 2.93]) and M6 (1.85 [1.17, 2.91]) predicted higher fall risk. Participants with orthostatic hypotension at M1 (3.07 [1.48, 6.38]) and M2 (3.72 [1.72, 8.03]) were more likely to have reported orthostatic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthostatic hypotension was most prevalent and symptomatic immediately within 1-2 min after standing, but more informative for fall risk after 4.5 min. Clinicians may consider both intervals when assessing for orthostatic hypotension.

Body Position and Orthostatic Hypotension in Hypertensive Adults: Results from the Syst-Eur Trial

BACKGROUND

We recently demonstrated that more intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment lowered risk of orthostatic hypotension (OH) measured with a seated-to-standing protocol. However, seated-to-standing OH assessments are less sensitive than supine-to-standing and could miss clinically relevant OH.

OBJECTIVES

Using data from the Syst-Eur trial (Systolic Hypertension in Europe), we examined the effect of hypertension treatment on incidence of OH based on the difference in BP from 3 body positions.

METHODS

Syst-Eur was a multi-center, randomized trial that enrolled adults with isolated systolic hypertension to investigate whether active hypertension treatment could reduce cardiovascular events. Participants underwent BP measurement in supine, seated, and standing positions. Using differences in BP between the 3 body positions (seated minus supine, standing minus seated, and standing minus supine), we defined OH as a drop in systolic BP ≥20 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥10 mm Hg. We included measurements from baseline and follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Among 4695 participants (mean age, 70.2±6.7 years; 66.9% female) with 42 636 BP measurements, OH was present in 4.9% of measures with supine-to-seated, 7.9% with seated-to-standing, and 11.4% with supine-to-standing protocols, respectively. Compared with placebo, BP treatment did not increase OH with any set of maneuvers, OR, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95) with seated-to standing, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.24) with supine-to-seated, and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.86-1.15) with supine-to-standing.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of protocol, active hypertension treatment did not increase the risk of OH, reinforcing evidence that OH should not be viewed as a complication of hypertension treatment.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02088450.

Reply to: Comment on: Comparison of supine and seated orthostatic hypotension assessments and their association with falls and orthostatic symptoms

This letter comments on the letter by Baker et al.

World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative

BACKGROUND

falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects on functional independence and quality of life and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health related costs. Current guidelines are inconsistent, with no up-to-date, globally applicable ones present.

OBJECTIVES

to create a set of evidence- and expert consensus-based falls prevention and management recommendations applicable to older adults for use by healthcare and other professionals that consider: (i) a person-centred approach that includes the perspectives of older adults with lived experience, caregivers and other stakeholders; (ii) gaps in previous guidelines; (iii) recent developments in e-health and (iv) implementation across locations with limited access to resources such as low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

a steering committee and a worldwide multidisciplinary group of experts and stakeholders, including older adults, were assembled. Geriatrics and gerontological societies were represented. Using a modified Delphi process, recommendations from 11 topic-specific working groups (WGs), 10 ad-hoc WGs and a WG dealing with the perspectives of older adults were reviewed and refined. The final recommendations were determined by voting.

RECOMMENDATIONS

all older adults should be advised on falls prevention and physical activity. Opportunistic case finding for falls risk is recommended for community-dwelling older adults. Those considered at high risk should be offered a comprehensive multifactorial falls risk assessment with a view to co-design and implement personalised multidomain interventions. Other recommendations cover details of assessment and intervention components and combinations, and recommendations for specific settings and populations.

CONCLUSIONS

the core set of recommendations provided will require flexible implementation strategies that consider both local context and resources.