Women's experiences and perceptions of women-centered care and respectful care during facility-based childbirth: A meta-synthesis

A cluster analysis of reasons behind fear of birth among women in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Fear of birth is common and complex, caused by a variety of reasons. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of pre-established reasons in relation to fear, and to identify profiles of women based on their reported reasons behind fear of birth.

METHODS

A cross-sectional Swedish study of women with self-reported fear of birth who completed an online survey. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used in the analysis of pre-established reasons in relation to self-reported severe fear. A Kappa-means cluster analysis was performed in order to group reasons, that were further investigated in relation to women's background variables.

RESULTS

A total of 1419 women completed the survey. The strongest reason behind fear of birth was to be forced to give birth vaginally. Four clusters were identified and labeled: minor complexity (reference group), relative minor complexity, relative major complexity, and major complexity. Cesarean section preference, previous mental health problems, being younger, primiparity, and exposure to domestic violence were factors related to cluster grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with fear of birth have various reasons and diverse complexities behind their fear. Health care providers need to investigate these reasons and support pregnant women with childbirth fear, based on their needs.

Cluster Analysis of Fear of Childbirth, Anxiety, Depression, and Childbirth Self-Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To identify clusters of women based on anxiety, depression, fear of birth, and childbirth self-efficacy and factors associated with the clusters.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Online in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women (N = 1,419).

METHODS

We collected data through online questionnaires. We included scales to measure anxiety, depression, worries about and fear of birth, and self-efficacy in a kappa-means cluster analysis. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals between clusters and background variables.

RESULTS

We identified 4 clusters based on severity: Resourceful-Robust, Resourceful-Fearful, Vulnerable-Fearful, and Fragile-Fearful. Participants in the Resourceful-Fearful and Vulnerable-Fearful clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the Resourceful-Robust cluster. Participants in the Vulnerable-Fearful and Fragile-Fearful clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the Resourceful-Robust cluster. Participants in the Fragile-Fearful cluster were more likely to be multiparous, report that their pregnancy was not normal, and prefer cesarean birth than those in the Resourceful-Robust cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with childbirth fear may be vulnerable to anxiety and depression during the perinatal period, although the severity might vary. Self-efficacy might be a mediator against mental health problems. Findings demonstrated levels of severity, and the one-size-fits-all approach in Swedish health care may benefit from a more targeted approach for women with fear of childbirth.

Key dimensions of women's and their partners' experiences of childbirth: A systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization 2018 intrapartum guideline for a positive birth experience emphasized the importance of maternal emotional and psychological well-being during pregnancy and the need for safe childbirth. Today, in many countries birth is safe, yet many women report negative and traumatic birth experiences, with adverse effects on their and their families' well-being. Many reviews have attempted to understand the complexity of women's and their partners' birth experience; however, it remains unclear what the key dimensions of the birth experience are.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the information from reviews of qualitative studies on the experience of childbirth in order to identify key dimensions of women's and their partners' childbirth experience.

METHODS

Systematic database searches yielded 40 reviews, focusing either on general samples or on specific modes of birth or populations, altogether covering primary studies from over 35,000 women (and >1000 partners) in 81 countries. We appraised the reviews' quality, extracted data and analysed it using thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Four key dimensions of women's and partners' birth experience (covering ten subthemes), were identified: 1) Perceptions, including attitudes and beliefs; 2) Physical aspects, including birth environment and pain; 3) Emotional challenges; and 4) Relationships, with birth companions and interactions with healthcare professionals. In contrast with the comprehensive picture that arises from our synthesis, most reviews attended to only one or two of these dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified key dimensions bring to light the complexity and multidimensionality of the birth experience. Within each dimension, pathways leading towards negative and traumatic birth experiences as well as pathways leading to positive experiences become tangible. Identifying key dimensions of the birth experience may help inform education and research in the field of birth experiences and gives guidance to practitioners and policy makers on how to promote positive birth experiences for women and their partners.

L'expérience de l'accouchement en milieu surveillé dans la province d'Essaouira au Maroc: Quelle réalité?

RésuméUne expérience positive de l'accouchement (EPA) est fondamentale pour des soins maternels de qualité. Toutefois, de nombreuses femmes subissent des comportements non respectueux lors de ce moment crucial. Au Maroc, peu d'études ont mesuré cette expérience, et les éléments l'influençant demeurent insuffisamment documentés. Nous avons conduit une recherche mixte dans la province d'Essaouira entre avril et décembre 2021. Notre enquête, basée sur un questionnaire, a sollicité l'avis de 240 femmes issues de huit centres de santé choisis au hasard. Par ailleurs, des entretiens semi-directifs ont été conduits avec 20 femmes, 47 professionnels de santé et quatre responsables administratifs. Les données quantitatives ont été soumises à des analyses descriptives, bi- et multivariées, tandis que les entretiens ont été analysés selon une approche de contenu thématique. Les données révèlent que 59.2% des participantes ont eu une expérience défavorable lors de leur dernier accouchement. Parmi elles, la majorité a déploré des soins non consentis (86.7%), un manque de respect de leur intimité (45.4%) et des abus verbaux (25%). L'EPA était principalement associée à la qualité de l'environnement de l'accouchement, au soutien pour l'allaitement, à la propreté des installations, au type d'établissement (privé) et à l'absence de complications médicales pendant le travail. Les entretiens ont révélé que le manque de motivation des professionnels de santé, l'absence de formation continue appropriée et des lacunes organisationnelles et managériales ont affecté l'EPA. Notre étude souligne le besoin crucial de formation continue axée sur le respect des patients, l'éthique et la déontologie, et met en lumière l'importance d'une politique motivante pour les professionnels de santé, notamment dans le secteur public.

[Traumatic childbirth and trauma-sensitive obstetric support]

Childbirth can be a very happy and empowering experience for women but also one of suffering and despair. Biographical traumatic experiences, especially sexual, physical and emotional violence, are risk factors for a traumatic childbirth experience with the danger of subsequent trauma sequelae and impaired mother-child bonding; however, obstetrically indicated interventions or poor communication in the delivery room can also primarily be experienced as traumatic.In recent years, policies affecting traumatic childbirth experience have been controversially and sometimes emotionally discussed. In the clinical obstetric routine there is often a fine line between medically necessary rapid interventions and emotionally supportive trauma-sensitive and preventive obstetric care. The following article addresses the causes and prevention strategies of traumatic childbirth experiences from obstetric, midwifery and psychotherapeutic perspectives.

"It could not have been more different." Comparing experiences of hospital-based birth and homebirth in Ireland: A mixed-methods survey

PROBLEM

Internationally, little is known about the experiences of the minority who have birthed both in hospital and at home. This group are in a unique position to provide experiential evidence regarding perceptions of care under each approach.

BACKGROUND

Obstetric care within the hospital setting is the hegemonic approach to birth in western cultures. Homebirth is at least as safe as hospital birth for those with low-risk pregnancies, yet access is strictly regulated.

AIM

To explore how those who have experienced both hospital and homebirth maternity care in Ireland perceived the care received, and experienced birth in each setting.

METHODS

141 participants who birthed both in hospital and at home between 2011 and 2021 completed an online survey.

FINDINGS

Participants' overall experience scores were significantly higher for homebirth (9.7/10) than hospital birth (5.5/10). In hospital, midwifery-led care scored significantly higher (6.4/10) than consultant-led care (4.9/10). Qualitative data revealed four explanatory themes: 1) Regulation of birth; 2) Continuity of care and/or carer and establishing relationships; 3) Bodily integrity and informed consent; and 4) Lived experiences of labour and birth at home and in hospital.

DISCUSSION

Homebirth was perceived far more positively than hospital birth experiences across all aspects of care surveyed. Findings suggest that those who have experienced both models of care have unique perspectives and aspirations about childbirth.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence regarding the need for genuine choices for maternity care and reveals the importance of care which is respectful and responsive to divergent ideologies about birth.

Iranian women's perception on the determinants of birth experience: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of cesarean birth in Iran is very high. Having a negative childbirth experience is one of the reasons that primiparous women provide to prefer caesarean birth over a vaginal birth. This study is aimed to understand women's perspective on what determines a positive or negative birth experience for them.

METHODS

This qualitative study is a part a mixed method study that was conducted among primiparous women with a previous vaginal birth experience. The purpose of the main study was to develop a guideline based on Iranian primiparous women's birth experiences. The quantitative phase of the study was a cross-sectional study where women's childbirth experiences was measured in a survey via the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire-2. In the qualitative part of the study, women were invited for an in-depth interview via a random stratified sampling method based on their childbirth mean score (women with 10% of the upper bound score which indicated a positive birth experience and 10% of the lower bound indicating negative birth experience, n = 17). Conventional content analysis was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

We extracted three main themes: (a) "Internal control", (b) "External control", and (c) "Support". Possessing internal control, having a balanced external control to feel cared and feeling supported were the main reasons for women to feel positive about their birth experiences. Whereas, loss of internal control, imbalanced external control and unsupportive environment were related to their negative childbirth experiences.

CONCLUSION

Considering that women's sense of control, the care and support that they receive can influence their childbirth experiences, there is a need for changing maternity policies and practices to highlight the importance of a woman-centred care to create a pleasant, respectful and positive memory for primirparous women who experience normal vaginal births.