The clinical spectrum of periorbital vascular complications after facial injection

Update on Blindness From Filler: Review of Prognostic Factors, Management Approaches, and a Century of Published Cases

Vision loss secondary to aesthetic filler treatment is a rare but disastrous complication. The aim of this review was to update the published cases of blindness after filler injection that have occurred since our group published reviews of 98 cases in 2015 and an additional 48 cases in 2019. A literature review was performed to identify all cases of visual complications caused by filler injection published between September 2018 and March 2023. The cases were analyzed independently and in combination with previously reviewed cases. Analyses were based on the number of cases with data available. A total of 365 new cases of partial or complete vision loss after filler injection were identified. The sites that were highest risk were the nose (40.6%), forehead (27.7%), and glabella (19.0%). The filler injected was hyaluronic acid in 79.6% of cases. The most common associated signs were ptosis (56.2%), ophthalmoplegia (44.1%), pain (31.2%), and skin changes (73.2%). Strokelike features were seen in 19.2% of cases. Of the cases reporting visual outcomes (318), 6.0% experienced complete vision recovery, 25.8% had partial improvement in visual acuity, and 68.2% had no vision recovery. Partially preserved visual acuity at onset was a significant predictor of visual improvement (P < .001). The 3 most common treatments were subcutaneous hyaluronidase at or near the filler site (70.1%), systemic steroids (57.3%), and intraarterial thrombolytic therapy (56.0%). No treatments were significantly associated with visual improvement (P > .05). Although blindness and stroke from fillers is a rare complication, practitioners who inject filler should have a thorough knowledge of prevention and management strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

"Filler-Associated Acute Stroke Syndrome": Classification, Predictive Modelling of Hyaluronidase Efficacy, and Updated Case Review on Neurological and Visual Complications

INTRODUCTION

The rising use of soft tissue fillers for aesthetic procedures has seen an increase in complications, including vascular occlusions and neurological symptoms that resemble stroke. This study synthesizes information on central nervous system (CNS) complications post-filler injections and evaluates the effectiveness of hyaluronidase (HYAL) treatment.

METHODS

A thorough search of multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, focused on publications from January 2014 to January 2024. Criteria for inclusion covered reviews and case reports that documented CNS complications related to soft tissue fillers. Advanced statistical and computational techniques, including logistic regression, machine learning, and Bayesian analysis, were utilized to dissect the factors influencing therapeutic outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis integrated findings from 20 reviews and systematic analyses, with 379 cases reported since 2018. Hyaluronic acid (HA) was the most commonly used filler, particularly in nasal region injections. The average age of patients was 38, with a notable increase in case reports in 2020. Initial presentation data revealed that 60.9% of patients experienced no light perception, while ptosis and ophthalmoplegia were present in 54.3 and 42.7% of cases, respectively. The statistical and machine learning analyses did not establish a significant linkage between the HYAL dosage and patient recovery; however, the injection site emerged as a critical determinant.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that HYAL treatment, while vital for managing complications, varies in effectiveness based on the injection site and the timing of administration. The non-Newtonian characteristics of HA fillers may also affect the incidence of complications. The findings advocate for tailored treatment strategies incorporating individual patient variables, emphasizing prompt and precise intervention to mitigate the adverse effects of soft tissue fillers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Disastrous cerebral and ocular vascular complications after cosmetic facial filler injections: a retrospective case series study

Soft tissue filler injections are among the most popular facial rejuvenation methods. Cerebral infarction and ophthalmic artery occlusion are rare and catastrophic complications, especially when facial cosmetic fillers are injected by inexperienced doctors. Radiologists and plastic surgeons need to increase their awareness of the complications associated with fillers, which allows early diagnosis and intervention to improve patient prognosis. Regarding the mechanism by which vascular occlusion occurs after facial filler injections, a retrograde embolic mechanism is currently the predominant theory. Numerous case reports have been presented regarding complications associated with injections of facial aesthetics. However, the small sample sizes of these studies did not allow for an adequate assessment of the clinical and imaging manifestations based on the location of the occlusion and the type of filler, and detailed elaboration of multiple cerebral infarctions is also lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological features of severe cerebral and ocular complications caused by cosmetic facial filler injections. In addition, we discuss the pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of these patients. The clinical, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings were described and analysed. Radiological examinations are crucial for demonstrating severe complications, and brain MRI is especially strongly suggested for patients with cosmetic filler-induced vision loss to identify asymptomatic cerebral infarctions. Extreme caution and care should be taken during facial injections by plastic surgeons.

Administration Method and Potential Efficacy of Hyaluronidase for Hyaluronic Acid Filler-Related Vision Loss: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

With the global increase in the use of injectable fillers, more cases with serious adverse events such vision loss are being reported. This article aims to review the cases of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler-related vision loss and to discuss the potential efficacy of hyaluronidase (HYASE) treatment via different given methods.

METHODS

A total of 29 articles presenting 144 cases of HA filler-related vision loss were included in this study.

RESULTS

Most cases of HA filler-related vision impairment were reported from China, followed by Korea. The majority of cases were seen in women. The nose, forehead and glabella were the most commonly injection sites. All cases had vision impairment and nearly all cases were unilateral with immediate onset of visual signs and symptoms. Ophthalmic artery occlusion (OAO) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) were the two most commonly involved arterial obstruction patterns featured with a very poor prognosis followed by branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), the most favorable involved arterial pattern for a better prognosis. HYASE given subcutaneously and intra-arterially helped with visual recovery to different degrees, while retrobulbar HYASE seemed to be less helpful.

CONCLUSION

Complications after HA-based filler injection are extremely rare but can cause disastrous visual impairment. HYASE given subcutaneously and intra-arterially helped with visual recovery to different extents, and the efficacy might be reinforced when performed together, while retrobulbar HYASE seemed to be less helpful. However, to accurately access the efficacy of HYASE via different administration methods, further randomized controlled trials are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Digital Compression of the Origin of the Nasal Branch of the Ophthalmic Artery During Filler Augmentation: A Review of the Anatomical Literature and an Analysis of Plastinated Specimens

The aim of this study was to determine the exact site of digital compression on the origin of the nasal branch of the ophthalmic artery during filler augmentation, by conducting a review of anatomical literature and examining plastinated specimens. According to 4 textbooks (Gray's Anatomy, Whitnall's Anatomy on the Human Orbit, Wolff's Anatomy, and Duke-Elder's System of Ophthalmology), the dorsal nasal artery leaves the orbit by piercing the orbital septum between the trochlea and the medial palpebral ligament and anastomoses with the angular part of the facial artery. In plastinated arterial specimens, the ophthalmic artery exits the orbit and divides into the supratrochlear artery and the dorsal nasal artery at the upper border of the lacrimal fossa. The dorsal nasal artery then anastomoses with the angular part of the facial artery. Branches of the dorsal nasal artery anastomose with their counterparts on the opposite side. During filler augmentation of the nose, bilateral digital compression is applied to the origins of the nasal branches of the ophthalmic artery, specifically at the point where the ophthalmic artery pierces the orbital septum. Applying compression just above the medial palpebral ligament against the bone, directly above the lacrimal sac, using the index finger and thumb can help prevent the migration of injected droplets to the ophthalmic artery. This straightforward maneuver, grounded in anatomical understanding, aims to prevent the migration of injected droplets to the ophthalmic artery.

Retinal artery occlusion after facial filler injection in a patient with patent foramen ovale: a case report and literature review

We describe a young woman with patent foramen ovale who developed multiple retinal artery occlusion in the right eye after injection of hyaluronic acid into the nasal root. She reported a gradual decline in visual acuity, with visual field defects that had developed in two stages. Multiple retinal artery occlusion was confirmed by slit-lamp examination, dilated fundus examination, optical coherence tomography, visual field examination, and fundus fluorescein angiography. A patent foramen ovale was detected by electrocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and transthoracic sonography. The patient was treated with intravenous dexamethasone and cobamamide, as well as extracorporeal counterpulsation therapy; this approach has not been described in previous literature regarding retinal artery occlusion. The patient's visual acuity improved from counting fingers at 30 cm to 20/133 within 3 days. Our report emphasizes the need for better understanding of vascular anatomy to minimize the risk of complications. Moreover, patients undergoing hyaluronic acid injection should receive information regarding the potential for mild and severe complications; relevant tests should be performed before surgery to exclude vulnerable patients. Finally, a nursing system is needed to facilitate the emergency recognition, triage, and management of retinal artery occlusion.

Clinical Manifestations and Prognosis of Embolism Caused by Filler Injection in Different Facial Regions

Background

Embolism is a serious complication after facial filling, with a usually poor prognosis of the symptoms after embolism. The authors systematically reviewed reported cases of facial vascular embolism, explored the relationship between the location and material used for facial filling and occurrence of vascular embolism, and assessed the prognosis of complications after vascular embolism.

Methods

This study provides a systematic review of published cases of vascular embolism after facial filling. A summary of the filling materials and filling sites for each case, the adverse reactions and embolized blood vessels, a recording of the time when each patient experienced adverse reactions and started treatment, and a presentation of their prognosis are provided.

Results

The frontal, eyebrow, and nose are common filling sites causing facial embolism. The main clinical manifestations after embolism were visual impairment, skin necrosis, and ptosis. The prognosis of visual impairment after embolization was poor, whereas skin necrosis and ptosis generally improved after treatment.

Conclusions

This article aimed to review the clinical manifestations, therapies, and prognosis of embolism after facial filling. A better understanding of these complications can help clinicians to detect the occurrence of complications as early as possible and give patients timely treatment.

Use of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase protocol in the management of impending skin necrosis associated with hyaluronic acid fillers: a systematic review

Impending skin necrosis resulting from inadvertent intravascular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers can lead to tissue loss and significant scarring. In recent years, management trends have shifted from multimodal approaches to the sole use of high doses of hyaluronidase. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase management protocol in preventing skin necrosis and possible subsequent scarring. An online search of the bibliographic databases PubMed and Embase yielded 3039 articles. A total of 72 studies reporting 186 cases were found to be eligible for inclusion. The selection and evaluation process was done according to the PRISMA criteria. Included studies were assessed using the JBI and STROBE critical appraisal tools. The analysis of treatment outcomes was done according to the timing of treatment initiation and the type of intervention used. This review found that an immediate intervention using the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase management protocol provided predictable and satisfactory outcomes. Initiating the protocol within 24 h of filler injection halted the progression of necrosis and prevented permanent sequelae. The conclusions are limited by the lack of a high level of evidence, since the only available sources of data are case reports and case series.

Ocular Complications Post-Cosmetic Periocular Hyaluronic Acid Injections: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

With the global rise in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers as a minimally invasive cosmetic procedure, significant adverse effects such as vascular compromise and blindness have become common. Hence, we present the first systematic review aimed to investigate ocular complications secondary to a facial HA injection and to understand the presentation, cause, management, and outcome of these complications.

METHODS

The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to report this review. A systematic search was performed in July 2021 for published literature using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. The following terms were used: facial fillers, facial injections, hyaluronic acid, blindness, ophthalmoplegia, diplopia, ptosis, ophthalmic artery occlusion, posterior ciliary artery occlusion, and ocular ischemic syndrome.

RESULTS

A total of 2496 publications were searched, and 34 articles published between January 2000 and July 2021 were included. Twenty-seven case reports and seven case series were evaluated. The nose was the most common site of injection (n = 25; 40.67%). Ocular pain was the most common initial symptom of ocular complications (n = 13, 22.41 %). The most common complication was vision loss (n = 17, 50%). The majority of patients received hyaluronidase, aspirin, and steroids. Regarding the outcome, 15 (45.45%) of the published studies showed no improvement in complications even after management.

CONCLUSION

HA is gaining popularity in cosmetic applications. Post-HA ocular complications nearly always have an immediate onset. Proper knowledge of potential adverse events is crucial for clinicians to attempt to decrease complications and improve outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Preseptal cellulitis associated with cosmetic eyelash lifting procedure

BACKGROUND

The increased popularity of periocular cosmetic applications in recent years has resulted in the appearance of various complications. The cosmetic eyelash lifting is one of these new techniques and is gradually becoming more popular. There are no previous reports of any complications of this procedure in the literature.

AIMS

In this study, we present a clinical case of preseptal cellulitis following cosmetic eyelash lifting procedure.

PATIENT/METHODS

A 55-year-old woman presented with bilateral eyelid swelling and redness. The history revealed that she had undergone cosmetic eyelash lifting procedure 2 days ago. There was no ocular movement limitation or pain. The biomicroscopic examination revealed bilateral eyelid edema and hyperemia, conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, and mucopurulent secretion. The diagnosis was preseptal cellulitis when the clinical examination was evaluated together with the results of the laboratory tests and radiological imaging.

RESULTS

Systemic and topical antibiotics were started, and the signs recovered in the first week.

CONCLUSIONS

Cosmetic eyelash lifting can rarely be one of the causes of preseptal cellulitis. It is important to detect and treat any blepharitis or meibomitis before the procedure. Eyelid hygiene and the proper sterilization conditions during the procedure must also be ensured.