Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of vitamin D deficiency in patients with warts: A case-controlled study

Intralesional injection of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) versus measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in treatment of molluscum contagiosum: a comparative study

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is a skin and mucous membrane infection caused by the molluscum virus (MCV). To evaluate safety and efficacy of intralesional injection of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) antigen injection versus MMR (mumps, measles, rubella) antigen for the treatment of molluscum contagiosum (MC). A total of thirty clinically confirmed patients of molluscum were recruited for this trial. Patients who were divided into three groups (A, B and C). Each group consisted of (30) patients. Group (A) subjects received intralesional MMR injections, group (B) subjects received intralesional PPD injection and group (C) received intralesional saline injection. The results of the present study revealed complete clearance of the injected lesions in 12 patients (80%), partial response in 3 patients (20%) of group (A). In group (B), complete clearance of the treated warts was observed in 11 patients (73.3%) and partial response in 4 (26.7%) of patients. In group (C), the majority of patients 8 (53.3%) demonstrated no response while 7 (46.7%) patients showed only partial clearance. We established a good safety and efficacy profile for tuberculin PPD and MMR antigens in treatment of molluscum contagiosum.

Topical Calcipotriol for the Treatment of Cutaneous Warts: An Assessor-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Background. Cutaneous warts are common epidermal proliferations caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of topical calcipotriol for the treatment of cutaneous warts. Methods. This assessor-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial included 56 patients with cutaneous warts referred to a dermatology clinic from January 21 to March 20, 2020. Patients were randomized into two groups (n = 28). One group received calcipotriol 0.05% ointment twice a day on the lesions with a uniform thickness of 1 mm, and the other group received a placebo. The duration of treatment was twomonths, which continued for another two months if resolution did not occur. The primary outcome was complete response to treatment evaluated four months after the initiation of therapy. Secondary outcomes were the number and size of warts assessed at 1, 2, and 4 months and adverse events, including erythema, pruritus, burning sensation, and scaling. Results. Patients in both groups were comparable regarding previous treatment, underlying disease, and disease duration. However, patients in the control group were older. Also, a higher proportion of patients in the calcipotriol group were male and had warts on their palms and toes. Moreover, a higher percentage of controls had moderate disease. The mean number and the size of lesions did not differ between groups before intervention; however, both were significantly lower in the calcipotriol group than in controls at 1st, 2nd, and 4th months. In addition, complete response to treatment was significantly higher in the calcipotriol group (85.7% vs. 16%; $P<0.001$ ). On the other hand, the frequency of adverse events was not different between groups ( $P=0.352$ ). Conclusions. Calcipotriol can be considered a safe and effective treatment option for cutaneous warts. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with IRCT20170818035762N2, available at https://www.irct.ir/trial/45716.

A prospective randomized controlled study of Mycobacterium Indicus Pranii vaccine, Measles Mumps Rubella vaccine and Vitamin D3 in extragenital cutaneous warts

DESIGN

Interventional, prospective, four arm randomized control.

SETTING

Outpatient department, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, AIIMS Jodhpur (Rajasthan), India.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred patients.

METHODS

The intervention administered in the groups were normal saline (A), vitamin D₃ (B), MIP (C), and MMR (D). The injections were given into the largest wart at 2-weekly intervals until complete clearance or for a maximum of seven sittings. Post-treatment clearance of the injected wart and the distant wart was compared on the basis of change in wart number, percentage clearance, and mean time to complete clearance. Side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were recruited. The mean percentage improvement in the injected and non-injected warts was 68.4% and 66.8%, respectively. Intention to treat analysis (ITT) showed that complete clearance of lesions in injected wart occurred in placebo, vit D₃ , MMR, and MIP arms in 64%, 66%, 58%, and 55% patients, respectively (p > 0.05), while in the non-injected warts in 62%, 64%, 52%, and 53%, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean time to achieve complete clearance of wart was fastest in MIP at 7.1 weeks followed by MMR at 7.2 weeks, VIT D₃ at 7.4 weeks and in placebo group 7.8 weeks (p > 0.05). Side effects noted were fever, pain, erythema, and swelling which was highest in VIT D₃ group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of immunotherapies was comparable to placebo with minimal side effects.

Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy with Transfer Factor Capsules in the Treatment of Multiple Plantar Warts

BACKGROUND

Plantar warts are a common cutaneous disease of the sole of the foot caused by human papillomavirus. Photodynamic therapy has gained increasing attention in the treatment of plantar warts.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy combined with transfer factor capsules in the treatment of multiple plantar warts.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with multiple plantar warts who visited our outpatient department from September 2017 to August 2019 were randomly divided into two groups. Twenty-three patients received photodynamic therapy (treatment group) and thirty-eight received cryotherapy (control group). Both groups also received immune modulator transfer factor capsules. Skin lesion score, numeric rating scale- (NRS-) 10 score, recurrence rate, adverse reactions, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were analyzed in both groups.

RESULTS

The mean skin lesion score improved from 13.39 ± 3.88 before treatment to 1.48 ± 2.50 after the last treatment in the treatment group and from 12.47 ± 2.99 before treatment to 4.47 ± 3.67 after the last treatment in the control group. The success rate after 3 months of treatment was 86.96% in the treatment group and 39.47% in the control group. After 3 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the treatment group (20%) than in the control group (53.33%). The mean DLQI score at three months after treatment was significantly lower in the treatment group (3.61 ± 1.16) than in the control group (6.31 ± 2.59).

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy combined with immunomodulators significantly increased the cure rate and reduced the recurrence rate of multiple plantar warts compared with traditional cryotherapy combined with immunomodulators.

Comparative study between intralesional injection of MMR, BCG, and candida albicans antigen in treatment of multiple recalcitrant warts

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous warts represent a challenging condition to treat.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intralesional injection of MMR (mumps, measles, and rubella) antigen, BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guerin) vaccine, and candida antigen for the treatment of multiple warts.

METHODS

A total of ninety (90) clinically confirmed adult patients complaining of recalcitrant extragenital warts of various sizes and durations were recruited in this randomized clinical trial. They were divided into three groups (A, B, and C). Each group consisted of (30) patients. Group (A) subjects received intralesional MMR injections. Group (B) subjects received intralesional BCG injection and Group (C) received intralesional candida antigen injection.

RESULTS

Full clearance of warts was observed in (73.33%, 70%, and 43.33%) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Infrequent side effects including pain, erythema, and minimal induration were reported in all groups but did not necessitate termination of treatment.

CONCLUSION

All the three modalities used demonstrated a simple, safe modality with low adverse events, and with no recurrence. To achieve an optimal response with an ideal immunotherapeutic agent and ideal dose, further comparative studies are warranted and on different populations and larger sample sizes.