Machine learning to predict adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INSPIRE, a publicly available research dataset for perioperative medicine

We present the INSPIRE dataset, a publicly available research dataset in perioperative medicine, which includes approximately 130,000 surgical operations at an academic institution in South Korea over a ten-year period between 2011 and 2020. This comprehensive dataset includes patient characteristics such as age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, diagnosis, surgical procedure code, department, and type of anaesthesia. The dataset also includes vital signs in the operating theatre, general wards, and intensive care units (ICUs), laboratory results from six months before admission to six months after discharge, and medication during hospitalisation. Complications include total hospital and ICU length of stay and in-hospital death. We hope this dataset will inspire collaborative research and development in perioperative medicine and serve as a reproducible external validation dataset to improve surgical outcomes.

Using machine learning to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery with machine learning using the data from the Australia New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database, cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion database, intensive care unit database and laboratory results.

METHODS

We obtained surgical, perfusion, intensive care unit and laboratory data from a single Australian tertiary cardiac surgical hospital from February 2015 to March 2022 and included 2000 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We trained our models to predict either the Papworth definition or Dyke et al.'s universal definition of perioperative bleeding. Our primary outcome was the performance of our machine learning algorithms using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC).

RESULTS

Of the 2000 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 13.3% (226/2000) had bleeding using the Papworth definition and 17.2% (343/2000) had moderate to massive bleeding using Dyke et al.'s definition. The best-performing model based on AUPRC was the Ensemble Voting Classifier model for both Papworth (AUPRC 0.310, AUROC 0.738) and Dyke definitions of bleeding (AUPRC 0.452, AUROC 0.797).

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning can incorporate routinely collected data from various datasets to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery.