1
|
Shibahara M, Hoshino K, Harada H, Ueda T, Kurita T, Yoshino K. A combined laparoscopic and vaginal approach with a novel method to reconstructing the uterine cervix in Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome with cervical obstruction: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2024; 121:110029. [PMID: 39013247 PMCID: PMC11304052 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome (HWWS) is characterized by uterine didelphys, unilateral cervical obstruction, and ipsilateral renal defects. Owing to its rarity, no standard surgical approach exists. PRESENTATION OF CASE An 11-year-old girl with severe dysmenorrhea had a duplicated uterus, a right cervical hemorrhagic cyst, and right ipsilateral kidney agenesis, indicative of HWWS. As transvaginal surgery was challenging, we turned to laparoscopic surgery for abdominal cavity inspection and surgical assistance. A longitudinal incision was made on the right uterus, followed by inserting a catheter tube fixed to an intrauterine device (IUD) into the right cervical canal from the anterior wall of the right uterine horn. Subsequently, the right external cervical os was inverted to prevent restenosis. Postoperatively, the hemorrhagic cyst at the right cervix disappeared. The patient had no symptom recurrence 24 months after the surgery. DISCUSSION The preoperative diagnosis for female genital malformations is complicated, and transvaginal manipulation is often difficult in adolescent girls. Laparoscopy is a valuable tool for evaluating female genital malformations, allowing for a thorough diagnosis and safe surgical treatment. In cases of female genital malformation with cervical obstruction, as in this case, reconstruction of the uterine cervix is important to prevent restenosis after surgery. CONCLUSION In female genital malformations, laparoscopy provides a comprehensive evaluation of the malformation, assisting in a precise diagnosis and safe surgical treatment. Insertion of the catheter tube with IUD into the uterus and reconstruction of the cervix contribute to preventing restenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mami Shibahara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Kaori Hoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Harada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Taeko Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Tomoko Kurita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chitoran E, Rotaru V, Mitroiu MN, Durdu CE, Bohiltea RE, Ionescu SO, Gelal A, Cirimbei C, Alecu M, Simion L. Navigating Fertility Preservation Options in Gynecological Cancers: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2214. [PMID: 38927920 PMCID: PMC11201795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Currently, an increasing number of women postpone pregnancy beyond the age of 35. Gynecological cancers affect a significant proportion of women of reproductive age, necessitating the development of fertility preservation methods to fulfill family planning. Consequently, providing treatment options that preserve fertility in women diagnosed with gynecological cancers has become a crucial component of care for survivors. (2) Methods: We conducted an extensive search of relevant scientific publications in PubMed and Embase databases and performed a narrative review, including high-quality peer-reviewed research on fertility after being treated for gynecologic cancers, reporting pregnancy rates, birth rates, and pregnancy outcomes in cancer survivors as well as therapeutic options which partially preserve fertility and methods for obtaining a pregnancy in survivors. (3) Discussion: The medicine practiced today is focused on both treating the neoplasm and preserving the quality of life of the patients, with fertility preservation being an important element of this quality. This leads to an improved quality of life, allowing these women to become mothers even in the seemingly adverse circumstances posed by such a pathology. However, although there are guidelines on female fertility preservation in the context of neoplasms, an analysis shows that physicians do not routinely consider it and do not discuss these options with their patients. (4) Conclusions: Advancements in medicine have led to a better understanding and management of gynecological neoplasms, resulting in increased survival rates. Once the battle against these neoplasms is won, the issue of preserving the quality of life for these women arises, with fertility preservation being an important aspect for women who have not yet fulfilled their family planning desires at the time of diagnosis. It is important for patients to be informed about the available options for fertility preservation and to be encouraged to make informed decisions in collaboration with their medical team. Standardized recommendations for onco-fertility into guidelines should be taken into consideration in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Chitoran
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Rotaru
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Cristiana-Elena Durdu
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Roxana-Elena Bohiltea
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Sinziana-Octavia Ionescu
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Aisa Gelal
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ciprian Cirimbei
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihnea Alecu
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laurentiu Simion
- School of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.); (S.-O.I.)
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Department I, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kasuga Y, Hasegawa K, Hamuro A, Fukuma Y, Tamai J, Tanaka Y, Ikenoue S, Tanaka M. Pregnancy outcomes following radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective observational study in the Kanto area, Japan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 164:108-114. [PMID: 37340875 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors aimed to investigate the prevalence of pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in patients who underwent radical trachelectomy (RT) for early-stage cervical cancer in the Kanto area, Japan. METHOD A survey among 113 perinatal centers affiliated with the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology was conducted to investigate their experience in managing pregnancies following RT, between 2010 and 2020. The association between preterm delivery (before 34 gestational weeks) and a midtrimester short cervix (<13 mm) was evaluated. RESULTS The authors retrospectively collected maternal and perinatal data from 13 hospitals. There were 135 pregnancies among 115 women following RT. Of the 135 pregnancies, 32 were miscarriages (<12 gestational weeks: n = 22; >12 gestational weeks: n = 10), and 103 were delivered after 22 gestational weeks. The incidences of preterm delivery before 28 and 34 gestational weeks were 8.7% and 30.1%, respectively. A midtrimester short residual cervix was associated with preterm delivery (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION Since more than 100 pregnancies were recorded after RT in the Kanto area, many physicians had more opportunities to manage pregnancy after RT. Pregnancy following RT is associated with increased risk of preterm delivery, and midtrimester short residual cervix is a good predictor of preterm delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshifumi Kasuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keita Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Asuka Hamuro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuka Fukuma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Tamai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuya Tanaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Ikenoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mamoru Tanaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuurman T, Zilver S, Samuels S, Schats W, Amant F, van Trommel N, Lok C. Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1008. [PMID: 33670929 PMCID: PMC7975326 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is increasingly being offered to women with a gynecological malignancy who wish to preserve fertility. In this systematic review, we evaluate the best evidence currently available on oncological and reproductive outcome after FSS for early stage cervical cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. An extensive literature search was conducted using the electronic databases Medline (OVID), Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies published up to December 2020. In total, 153 studies were included with 7544, 3944, and 1229 patients who underwent FSS for cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, respectively. We assessed the different FSS techniques that are available to preserve fertility, i.e., omitting removal of the uterine body and preserving at least one ovary. Overall, recurrence rates after FSS are reassuring and therefore, these conservative procedures seem oncologically safe in the current selection of patients with low-stage and low-grade disease. However, generalized conclusions should be made with caution due to the methodology of available studies, i.e., mostly retrospective cohort studies with a heterogeneous patient population, inducing selection bias. Moreover, about half of patients do not pursue pregnancy despite FSS and the reasons for these decisions have not yet been well studied. International collaboration will facilitate the collection of solid evidence on FSS and the related decision-making process to optimize patient selection and counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teska Schuurman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (T.S.); (S.S.); (F.A.); (N.v.T.)
| | - Sanne Zilver
- Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Sanne Samuels
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (T.S.); (S.S.); (F.A.); (N.v.T.)
| | - Winnie Schats
- Department of Scientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (T.S.); (S.S.); (F.A.); (N.v.T.)
- Department of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nienke van Trommel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (T.S.); (S.S.); (F.A.); (N.v.T.)
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (T.S.); (S.S.); (F.A.); (N.v.T.)
| |
Collapse
|