1
|
Shibahara D, Tanaka K, Togao O, Shiraishi Y, Yoneshima Y, Iwama E, Yoshitake T, Ishigami K, Okamoto I. Bevacizumab for Brain Radiation Necrosis in Patients With Nonsquamous Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2024:S1525-7304(24)00135-9. [PMID: 39068108 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Shibahara
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Kentaro Tanaka
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Osamu Togao
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Shiraishi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuto Yoneshima
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Eiji Iwama
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tadamasa Yoshitake
- Department of Radiology Informatics and Network, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kousei Ishigami
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Isamu Okamoto
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dagher R, Gad M, da Silva de Santana P, Sadeghi MA, Yewedalsew SF, Gujar SK, Yedavalli V, Köhler CA, Khan M, Tavora DGF, Kamson DO, Sair HI, Luna LP. Umbrella review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging test accuracy studies in Differentiating between brain tumor progression versus pseudoprogression and radionecrosis. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:1-15. [PMID: 38212574 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04528-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study we gathered and analyzed the available evidence regarding 17 different imaging modalities and performed network meta-analysis to find the most effective modality for the differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and post-treatment radiation effects. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive systematic search on PubMed and Embase. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) instrument. For each meta-analysis, we recalculated the effect size, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio from the individual study data provided in the original meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Imaging technique comparisons were then assessed using NMA. Ranking was assessed using the multidimensional scaling approach and by visually assessing surface under the cumulative ranking curves. RESULTS We identified 32 eligible studies. High confidence in the results was found in only one of them, with a substantial heterogeneity and small study effect in 21% and 9% of included meta-analysis respectively. Comparisons between MRS Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr, DWI, and DSC were most studied. Our analysis showed MRS (Cho/NAA) and 18F-DOPA PET displayed the highest sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios. 18-FET PET was ranked highest among the 17 studied techniques with statistical significance. APT MRI was the only non-nuclear imaging modality to rank higher than DSC, with statistical insignificance, however. CONCLUSION The evidence regarding which imaging modality is best for the differentiation between radiation necrosis and post-treatment radiation effects is still inconclusive. Using NMA, our analysis ranked FET PET to be the best for such a task based on the available evidence. APT MRI showed promising results as a non-nuclear alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Dagher
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Mona Gad
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Mohammad Amin Sadeghi
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | | - Sachin K Gujar
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Vivek Yedavalli
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Cristiano André Köhler
- Medical Sciences Post-Graduation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | - Majid Khan
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | | - David Olayinka Kamson
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haris I Sair
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Licia P Luna
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps B100F, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hooper GW, Ansari S, Johnson JM, Ginat DT. Advances in the Radiological Evaluation of and Theranostics for Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4162. [PMID: 37627190 PMCID: PMC10453051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging is essential for evaluating patients with glioblastoma. Traditionally a multimodality undertaking, CT, including CT cerebral blood profusion, PET/CT with traditional fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), and MRI have been the mainstays for diagnosis and post-therapeutic assessment. However, recent advances in these modalities, in league with the emerging fields of radiomics and theranostics, may prove helpful in improving diagnostic accuracy and treating the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shehbaz Ansari
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Jason M. Johnson
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Daniel T. Ginat
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Mauler J, Kocher M, Filß CP, Stoffels G, Régio Brambilla C, Stegmayr C, Willuweit A, Worthoff WA, Shah NJ, Lerche C, Mottaghy FM, Lohmann P. Hybrid PET/MRI in Cerebral Glioma: Current Status and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3577. [PMID: 37509252 PMCID: PMC10377176 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced MRI methods and PET using radiolabelled amino acids provide valuable information, in addition to conventional MR imaging, for brain tumour diagnostics. These methods are particularly helpful in challenging situations such as the differentiation of malignant processes from benign lesions, the identification of non-enhancing glioma subregions, the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related changes, and the early assessment of responses to anticancer therapy. The debate over which of the methods is preferable in which situation is ongoing, and has been addressed in numerous studies. Currently, most radiology and nuclear medicine departments perform these examinations independently of each other, leading to multiple examinations for the patient. The advent of hybrid PET/MRI allowed a convergence of the methods, but to date simultaneous imaging has reached little relevance in clinical neuro-oncology. This is partly due to the limited availability of hybrid PET/MRI scanners, but is also due to the fact that PET is a second-line examination in brain tumours. PET is only required in equivocal situations, and the spatial co-registration of PET examinations of the brain to previous MRI is possible without disadvantage. A key factor for the benefit of PET/MRI in neuro-oncology is a multimodal approach that provides decisive improvements in the diagnostics of brain tumours compared with a single modality. This review focuses on studies investigating the diagnostic value of combined amino acid PET and 'advanced' MRI in patients with cerebral gliomas. Available studies suggest that the combination of amino acid PET and advanced MRI improves grading and the histomolecular characterisation of newly diagnosed tumours. Few data are available concerning the delineation of tumour extent. A clear additive diagnostic value of amino acid PET and advanced MRI can be achieved regarding the differentiation of tumour recurrence from treatment-related changes. Here, the PET-guided evaluation of advanced MR methods seems to be helpful. In summary, there is growing evidence that a multimodal approach can achieve decisive improvements in the diagnostics of cerebral gliomas, for which hybrid PET/MRI offers optimal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jörg Mauler
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Peter Filß
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Cláudia Régio Brambilla
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Antje Willuweit
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Wieland Alexander Worthoff
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Nadim Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Lerche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| | - Felix Manuel Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu T, Liu C, Thamizhchelvan AM, Fleischer C, Peng X, Liu G, Mao H. Label-Free Chemically and Molecularly Selective Magnetic Resonance Imaging. CHEMICAL & BIOMEDICAL IMAGING 2023; 1:121-139. [PMID: 37235188 PMCID: PMC10207347 DOI: 10.1021/cbmi.3c00019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Biomedical imaging, especially molecular imaging, has been a driving force in scientific discovery, technological innovation, and precision medicine in the past two decades. While substantial advances and discoveries in chemical biology have been made to develop molecular imaging probes and tracers, translating these exogenous agents to clinical application in precision medicine is a major challenge. Among the clinically accepted imaging modalities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) exemplify the most effective and robust biomedical imaging tools. Both MRI and MRS enable a broad range of chemical, biological and clinical applications from determining molecular structures in biochemical analysis to imaging diagnosis and characterization of many diseases and image-guided interventions. Using chemical, biological, and nuclear magnetic resonance properties of specific endogenous metabolites and native MRI contrast-enhancing biomolecules, label-free molecular and cellular imaging with MRI can be achieved in biomedical research and clinical management of patients with various diseases. This review article outlines the chemical and biological bases of several label-free chemically and molecularly selective MRI and MRS methods that have been applied in imaging biomarker discovery, preclinical investigation, and image-guided clinical management. Examples are provided to demonstrate strategies for using endogenous probes to report the molecular, metabolic, physiological, and functional events and processes in living systems, including patients. Future perspectives on label-free molecular MRI and its challenges as well as potential solutions, including the use of rational design and engineered approaches to develop chemical and biological imaging probes to facilitate or combine with label-free molecular MRI, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianhe Wu
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Claire Liu
- F.M.
Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| | - Anbu Mozhi Thamizhchelvan
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Candace Fleischer
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Xingui Peng
- Jiangsu
Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging, Department of
Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School
of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
| | - Guanshu Liu
- F.M.
Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
- Russell
H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| | - Hui Mao
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| |
Collapse
|