Impact of clinical leadership in advanced practice roles on outcomes in health care: A scoping review

Understanding strategies that foster nurses to act as clinical leaders in hospitals: A realist review

AIM

To identify strategies that develop clinical nursing leadership competencies among staff nurses, and to explain the contextual elements and mechanisms that underpin the development of clinical nursing leadership competencies.

DESIGN

Realist review according to the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses-Evolving Standards (RAMESES).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, PsycInfo and ProQuest were searched from January 2000 until October 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Three iterative phases: (1) development of initial programme theory, (2) structured searches for relevant published and grey literature and (3) data synthesis and interpretation by researchers and theory triangulation, and discussions within the research group.

RESULTS

Multiple context-mechanism-outcome configurations were extracted from 10 reports that explain how, under what circumstances and why strategies can facilitate (or discourage) staff nurses to act as clinical leaders. Reports were both quantitative and qualitative in design, originating from English-speaking countries only.

CONCLUSIONS

A logic model was developed and suggests four contexts and five mechanisms underlying the development of clinical nursing leadership. Growth in clinical nursing leadership was mainly experienced through experiential learning, which was enhanced by a supportive relationship with a coach or mentor, the use of reflective practices and modelling from other leaders. Furthermore, a supportive work environment triggers ownership, confidence and motivation, and thereby growth in clinical nursing leadership competencies.

IMPACT

Fostering competencies for clinical leadership among staff nurses requires multifaceted strategies. Strategies are successful if, and only if, they combine learning by doing, by knowing and by observing, and establish a responsive work environment. Hospital policy should ensure that staff nurses have access to reciprocal relationships with role models or a coach. In order to grow as clinical nurse leader, ownership and self-reflection on own leadership behaviour need to be facilitated.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Prospero ID CRD42021292290.

Work characteristics, job satisfaction and intention to leave: a cross-sectional survey of advanced nurse practitioners

BACKGROUND

Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) are highly skilled health care professionals with the potential to play a major role in improving the quality and accessibility of health care services. However, there is emerging evidence of disquiet among nurse practitioners who often work in suboptimal work environments. Therefore, it is important to understand the elements that contribute to ANPs' job satisfaction and retention in healthcare services.

AIM

To examine the effects of commitment to the workplace, work engagement, and influence at work on job satisfaction and intention to leave of ANPs.

METHODS

A total of 153 ANP's on the advanced practice section of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland register completed a web survey between July and August 2020. Independent variables (commitment to the workplace, work engagement, and influence at work) were measured using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between dependent and independent variables.

RESULTS

Participants who reported higher levels of influence at work and higher levels of commitment to the workplace were also satisfied in their job (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.025), (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.14, p < 0.001) respectively. Additionally, ANPs with higher levels of commitment to work were significantly less likely to leave their role (OR 0.94, 95% CI .92-.96, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Healthcare organisations can improve job satisfaction and decrease intention to leave by creating environments in which ANPs are supported by their colleagues and supervisors, and facilitate their practice to the full extent of their capabilities.

Attributes, skills and actions of clinical leadership in nursing as reported by hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study

Background

Research shows a significant growth in clinical leadership from a nursing perspective; however, clinical leadership is still misunderstood in all clinical environments. Until now, clinical leaders were rarely seen in hospitals’ top management and leadership roles.

Purpose

This study surveyed the attributes and skills of clinical nursing leadership and the actions that effective clinical nursing leaders can do.

Methods

In 2020, a cross-sectional design was used in the current study using an online survey, with a non-random purposive sample of 296 registered nurses from teaching, public and private hospitals and areas of work in Jordan, yielding a 66% response rate. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis of frequency and central tendency measures, and comparisons were performed using independent t-tests.

Results

The sample consists mostly of junior nurses. The ‘most common’ attributes associated with clinical nursing leadership were effective communication, clinical competence, approachability, role model and support. The ‘least common’ attribute associated with clinical nursing leadership was ‘controlling’. The top-rated skills of clinical leaders were having a strong moral character, knowing right and wrong and acting appropriately. Leading change and service improvement were clinical leaders’ top-rated actions. An independent t-test on key variables revealed substantial differences between male and female nurses regarding the actions and skills of effective clinical nursing leadership.

Conclusions

The current study looked at clinical leadership in Jordan’s healthcare system, focusing on the role of gender in clinical nursing leadership. The findings advocate for clinical leadership by nurses as an essential element of value-based practice, and they influence innovation and change. As clinical leaders in various hospitals and healthcare settings, more empirical work is needed to build on clinical nursing in general and the attributes, skills and actions of clinical nursing leadership of nursing leaders and nurses.

Correlates and predictors of clinical leadership need analysis (CLeeNA) for nurses: A cross-sectional web-based study

BACKGROUND

Clinical leadership is the process of improving different organizational and patient care processes that achieve high-quality and safety of care outcomes. Clinical leadership is about having the appropriate skills and attributes to manage clinical settings. Nurses need to develop managerial and leadership skills; thus, nurses clinical leadership skills should be developed in all clinical settings. The clinical leadership needs of nurses received limited focus; the concept is still not fully understood.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the correlates and predictors of nurses' clinical leadership needs in Jordan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a cross-sectional research design utilizing a purposive sample of 349 nurses were recruited from different hospitals. Pearson correlation coefficients standard multiple linear regressions were mainly used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The "leadership and clinical practice" was the highest mean score of the subscales, while the "financial and service management" was the lowest. At an alpha of 0.05, significant positive moderate correlations were found between nurses' clinical leadership needs and: level of education, age, years of experience in nursing, years of experience in leadership, number of employees under the direct supervision of the leader, and type of the hospitals. At an alpha of 0.01, significant positive weak correlations were found between nurses' clinical leadership needs and: marital status, title, and unit/ward organizational structure. Marital status-separated/divorced/widowed, and years of nursing-4 years or less predicted negatively affect nurses' clinical leadership needs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Meeting the clinical leadership needs of nurses will positively contribute to various clinical settings outcomes. Leadership training is needed to enhance nurses' clinical leadership skills and competencies.

Coping strategies that motivated frontline nurses while caring for the covid-19 patients during the pandemic: A Scoping Review

Background

The world faced a great health crisis during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Consequently, the health care providers struggled and faced tremendous difficulties in treating high‐load critical patients. This was particularly true in low‐ and middle‐income countries where the work and patient loads are always higher and nurses at the forefront must deal with emergencies while being at high risk of exposure. However, little is known about the survival strategies of frontline nurses as dealt with the pandemic.

Objectives

This study catalogued the coping strategies of frontline nurses to deal with caring for the COVID‐19 patients during the pandemic.

Methods

The Arksey O'Malley framework was followed to conduct a scoping review. A systematic literature search was conducted using three databases: Google Scholar, Scopus and PubMed; and out of the 192 studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria set for this review study.

Results

A total of 44 strategies were identified that motivated nurses to deal with the COVID‐19 situation, and these strategies could be categorized into five main themes: nurses' self‐strategies, nurses' strategies at the ethical level, employers' strategies, nursing leaders' strategies and supplementary strategies.

Conclusions

The findings of this study will provide guidance for health care workers, employers, policymakers, regulators and other stakeholders to adopt and promote different strategies in managing difficult emergency situations in future.

Implications for nursing management

This study emphasizes the importance of learning how to deal with adversity by health care workers and organizations in an emergency.

Strengthening nursing, midwifery and allied health professional leadership in the UK – a realist evaluation

Purpose

This paper aims to share the findings of a realist evaluation study that set out to identify how to strengthen nursing, midwifery and allied health professions (NMAHP) leadership across all health-care contexts in the UK conducted between 2018 and 2019. The collaborative research team were from the Universities of Bangor, Ulster, the University of the West of Scotland and Canterbury Christ Church University.

Design/methodology/approach

Realist evaluation and appreciative inquiry were used across three phases of the study. Phase 1 analysed the literature to generate tentative programme theories about what works, tested out in Phase 2 through a national social media Twitter chat and sense-making workshops to help refine the theories in Phase 3. Cross-cutting themes were synthesised into a leadership framework identifying the strategies that work for practitioners in a range of settings and professions based on the context, mechanism and output configuration of realist evaluation. Stakeholders contributed to the ongoing interrogation, analysis and synthesis of project outcomes.

Findings

Five guiding lights of leadership, a metaphor for principles, were generated that enable and strengthen leadership across a range of contexts. – “The Light Between Us as interactions in our relationships”, “Seeing People’s Inner Light”, “Kindling the Spark of light and keeping it glowing”, “Lighting up the known and the yet to be known” and “Constellations of connected stars”.

Research limitations/implications

This study has illuminated the a-theoretical nature of the relationships between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in the existing leadership literature. There is more scope to develop the tentative programme theories developed in this study with NMAHP leaders in a variety of different contexts. The outcomes of leadership research mostly focussed on staff outcomes and intermediate outcomes that are then linked to ultimate outcomes in both staff and patients (supplemental). More consideration needs to be given to the impact of leadership on patients, carers and their families.

Practical implications

The study has developed additional important resources to enable NMAHP leaders to demonstrate their leadership impact in a range of contexts through the leadership impact self-assessment framework which can be used for 360 feedback in the workplace using the appreciative assessment and reflection tool.

Social implications

Whilst policymakers note the increasing importance of leadership in facilitating the culture change needed to support health and care systems to adopt sustainable change at pace, there is still a prevailing focus on traditional approaches to individual leadership development as opposed to collective leadership across teams, services and systems. If this paper fails to understand how to transform leadership policy and education, then it will be impossible to support the workforce to adapt and flex to the increasingly complex contexts they are working in. This will serve to undermine system integration for health and social care if the capacity and capability for transformation are not attended to. Whilst there are ambitious global plans (WHO, 2015) to enable integrated services to be driven by citizen needs, there is still a considerable void in understanding how to authentically engage with people to ensure the transformation is driven by their needs as opposed to what the authors think they need. There is, therefore, a need for systems leaders with the full skillset required to enable integrated services across place-based systems, particularly clinicians who are able to break down barriers and silo working across boundaries through the credibility, leadership and facilitation expertise they provide.

Originality/value

The realist evaluation with additional synthesis from key stakeholders has provided new knowledge about the principles of effective NMAHP leadership in health and social care, presented in such a way that facilitates the use of the five guiding lights to inform further practice, education, research and policy development.