Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of four tablet-based applications for three-dimensional facial scanning: an in-vitro study.: Tablet-based applications for 3D facial scanning

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the overall and regional accuracy (trueness and precision) of digital three-dimensional (3D) facial scans obtained from four tablet-based applications, which were (Bellus) the Bellus Dental Pro® (Bellus3D, Inc. Campbell, CA, USA), (Capture) the Capture®: 3D Scan Anything (Standard Cyborg, Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA), (Heges) the Heges® (by Marek Simonik, Ostrava, North Moravia, Czech Republic), and (Scandy) the Scandy Pro 3D Scanner® (Scandy LLC, New Orleans, LA, USA).

METHODS

A mannequin's face was marked with 63 landmarks. Subsequently, it was scanned 5 times using each scan application on an iPad Pro® (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA). The digital measurements were obtained with MeshLab® (CNR-ISTI, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy) and compared to the manual measurements using a digital vernier caliper (Truper Herramientas S.A., Colonia Granada, Mexico City, Mexico). The absolute mean difference and the standard deviation of the dimensional discrepancies were calculated. Moreover, the data were analysed by using one-way ANOVA, Levene's test, and Bonferroni´s correction.

RESULTS

The absolute mean trueness values were Bellus 0.41 ± 0.35 mm, Capture 0.38 ± 0.37 mm, Heges 0.39 ± 0.38 mm, and Scandy 0.47 ± 0.44 mm. Moreover, precision values were Bellus 0.46 mm, Capture 0.46 mm, Heges 0.54 mm, and Scandy 0.64 mm. Comparing the regions, Capture and Scandy showed the highest absolute mean difference, which was 0.81 mm in the Frontal and Zygomaticofacial regions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The trueness and precision of all four tablet-based applications were clinically acceptable for diagnosis and treatment planning.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The future of the three-dimensional facial scan is auspicious, and it has the potential to be affordable, accurate, and of great value for clinicians in their daily practice.

Accuracy between 2D Photography and Dual-Structured Light 3D Facial Scanner for Facial Anthropometry: A Clinical Study

(1) Background: Facial scanners are used in different fields of dentistry to digitalize the soft tissues of the patient's face. The development of technology has allowed the patient to have a 3-dimensional virtual representation, facilitating facial integration in the diagnosis and treatment plan. However, the accuracy of the facial scanner and the obtaining of better results with respect to the manual or two-dimensional (2D) method are questionable. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of the 3D method (a dual-structured light facial scanner) and compare it with the 2D method (photography) to obtain facial analysis in the maximum intercuspation position and smile position. (2) Methods: A total of 60 participants were included, and nine facial landmarks and five interlandmarks distances were determined by two independent calibrated operators for each participant. All measurements were made using three methods: the manual method (manual measurement), the 2D method (photography), and the 3D method (facial scanner). All clinical and lighting conditions, as well as the specific parameters of each method, were standardized and controlled. The facial interlandmark distances were made by using a digital caliper, a 2D software program (Adobe Photoshop, version 21.0.2), and a 3D software program (Meshlab, version 2020.12), respectively. The data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test revealed that trueness and precision values were normally distributed (p > 0.05), so a Student's t-test was employed. (3) Results: Statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) were observed in all interlandmark measurements in the 2D group (photography) to compare with the manual group. The 2D method obtained a mean accuracy value of 2.09 (±3.38) and 2.494 (±3.67) in maximum intercuspation and smile, respectively. On the other hand, the 3D method (facial scanner) obtained a mean accuracy value of 0.61 (±1.65) and 0.28 (±2.03) in maximum intercuspation and smile, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences with the manual method. (4) Conclusions: The employed technique demonstrated that it influences the accuracy of facial records. The 3D method reported acceptable accuracy values, while the 2D method showed discrepancies over the clinically acceptable limits.

Guided Access Cavity Preparation Using a New Simplified Digital Workflow

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the precision of a simplified workflow using only preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans to gain guided access to root canals of extracted mandibular molars. A workflow using CBCT scanning associated with 3-dimensional oral scanning was used as a reference for comparison. The influence of the presence of coronal restoration in the simplified workflow was also evaluated.

METHODS

Forty-five mandibular molars were randomized into 3 groups: a control group in which digital planning was performed with CBCT and oral scanning and 2 experimental groups in which digital planning was performed only with CBCT examination. In experimental group 1, teeth had no coronal restorations, whereas in group 2 teeth presented with coronal composite restorations. After digital planning, the teeth were accessed using the guides, and a new CBCT scan was made to overlap the pre- and postoperative examinations. Precision was measured by calculating the deviation between the planned and prepared cavities in millimeters and angle. Data were compared using 1-way analysis of variance (P < .05).

RESULTS

All root canals were accessible after access preparation in all tested groups. Deviations of the planned and prepared access cavities were low, with a mean value of 0.55, 0.58, and 0.47 mm and 1.98°, 2.45°, and 1.43° for the control group, group 1, and group 2, respectively. No significant differences in millimeters or angle were observed among the 3 tested groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified digital workflow using only CBCT examination allowed a high level of precision in obtaining access in extracted molars with and without coronal restoration, presenting similar results compared with the digital workflow using CBCT and 3-dimensional oral scanning.

Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) digital facial photographs taken by the Bellus3D Face Camera Pro (Bellus3D) (Bellus3D Inc, Los Gatos, Calif) and the 3dMDface system (3dMD) (3dMD Inc, Atlanta, Ga) with one another and with direct anthropometry (DA).

METHODS

A mannequin head was selected as the research object. Twenty facial landmarks were labeled on the basis of the 8 interlandmark distances and 5 angles that were defined. A 150-mm digital Vernier caliper (Mitutoyo Inc, Tokyo, Japan) with an accuracy of 0.02 mm was applied to directly measure the interlandmark distances, and the angles were calculated according to the law of cosines. All the measurements were conducted 3 times by each operator under identical conditions. Then, each scanner was used to acquire 3D photographs 5 times, generating 10 digital stereophotographs. Linear distances and angles were measured on the 3D facial photographs reconstructed with open-source MeshLab software (ISTI [Italian National Research Council], Rome, Italy). Each linear distance and angle were measured 3 times by 1 operator, and 3 examiners conducted the measurements independently. To obtain the trueness, equivalence tests were applied to compare the measurements of the 2 scanners and DA. In addition, the average absolute deviations were calculated to directly compare the trueness of 3 methods (Bellus3D vs 3dMD vs DA). Finally, the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess the interobserver agreement and the precision of 2 scanners.

RESULTS

As for the trueness, 7 out of 8 of the linear distance measurements (N-Pn, Sn-Pog, ORE-IRE, OLE-ILE, RLC-RMC, LLC-LMC, and CR-CL) and 3 out of 5 of the angular measurements (MLA, NFA, and INI) obtained by 3dMD were equivalent to those obtained by DA. Five out of 8 measurements (N-Pn, Sn-Pog, RLC-RMC, LLC-LMC, and CR-CL) and 1 out of 5 of the angular measurements (MLA) obtained by Bellus3D were equivalent to the measurements obtained with DA. All but 3 of the measurements (ORE-IRE, NFA, and INI) obtained with Bellus3D were equivalent to 3dMD. The mean absolute difference between 3dMD and DA was 0.36 ± 0.20 mm and 0.45° ± 0.56°; the deviation between Bellus3D and DA was 0.61 ± 0.47 mm and 0.99° ± 0.61°; and the deviation between Bellus3D and 3dMD was 0.38 ± 0.37 mm and 0.62° ± 0.39°. Regarding the precision of the 2 scanners, the intraclass correlation coefficient value of 3dMD was approximately 1.00, and that of Bellus3D was 0.99. The interobserver agreement for each linear and angular measurement was 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

The trueness of each scanner was clinically acceptable for diagnosis and treatment planning. The precision of 3D photographs obtained by 3dMD and Bellus3D showed good scanning repeatability. The interobserver agreement between the 3 operators was rated as excellent (0.99).

Accuracy of three-dimensional photogrammetry and cone beam computed tomography based on linear measurements in patients with facial deformities

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed to investigate the accuracy of soft-tissue measurements obtained by two imaging modalities, three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry and cone beam CT (CBCT) when confounded by influence factors (facial deformities and partitions).

METHODS

60 wax facial models from facially deformed patients were captured by 3D photogrammetry and CBCT. 19 linear distances on each image were measured and juxtaposed to reference values attained via a coordinate-measuring machine (CMM) as the gold-standard. Paired t-tests were used to compare linear accuracy of the test and reference systems. The influence of deformities and partitions (created by dividing the face with three vertical and five horizontal lines) on the measurement errors were analyzed by independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found between linear accuracy of the test and reference systems. The test values obtained by 3D photogrammetry were closer to the reference values than CBCT's. 3D photogrammetry's measurement errors were significantly higher in deformed areas, unlike CBCT's. Both systems reported significantly lower errors within partitions 8 and 13 compared to other partitions; for CBCT, aside from partitions 8 and 13, the differences in the errors for partitions 6 and 10 were significant compared to partitions 8, 12, 13, 14.

CONCLUSION

3D photogrammetry showed a higher linear accuracy than CBCT in patients with facial deformities due to protuberances. Facial reconstruction by both test modalities was significantly influenced in different facial partitions, but facial deformities extensively affected the results from 3D photogrammetry.

Accuracy Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Model Generated from Patient-Specific Monocular Video Data for Maxillofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate if the combination of a monoscopic photogrammetry technique and smartphone-recorded monocular video data could be appropriately applied to maxillofacial prosthesis fabrication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Smartphone video and laser scanning data were recorded for five healthy volunteers (24.1 ± 0.7 years). Three-dimensional (3D) facial models were generated using photogrammetry software and a laser scanner. Smartphone-recorded video data were used to generate a photogrammetric 3D model. The videos were recorded at two resolutions: 1080 × 1920 (high resolution) and 720 × 1280 pixels (low resolution). The lengths of five nasal component parts (nose height, nasal dorsum length, nasal column length, nasal ala length, and nose breadth) were compared in the photogrammetric 3D models (as the test model) and the laser scanned 3D models (as the validation model) using reverse engineering software.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the nasal dorsum length between the test model and the validation model (high resolution; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-5.07, Low resolution; confidence interval, 2.19-5.69). In contrast to the nasal dorsum length, there were no significant differences in nose height, nose breadth, nasal ala length, and nasal column length.

CONCLUSION

Using smartphone-recorded video data and a photogrammetry technique may be a promising technique to apply in the maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation workflow.

Accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional photography versus 3-dimensional soft tissue imaging

Purpose

This study was conducted to objectively and subjectively compare the accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional (2D) photography and 3-dimensional (3D) soft tissue imaging.

Materials and Methods

Facial images of 50 volunteers (25 males, 25 females) were captured with a Nikon D800 2D camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), 3D stereophotogrammetry (SPG), and laser scanning (LS). All subjects were imaged in a relaxed, closed-mouth position with a normal smile. The 2D images were then exported to Mirror® Software (Canfield Scientific, Inc, NJ, USA) and the 3D images into Proplan CMF® software (version 2.1, Materialise HQ, Leuven, Belgium) for further evaluation. For an objective evaluation, 2 observers identified soft tissue landmarks and performed linear measurements on subjects' faces (direct measurements) and both linear and angular measurements on all images (indirect measurements). For a qualitative analysis, 10 dental observers and an expert in facial imaging (subjective gold standard) completed a questionnaire regarding facial characteristics. The reliability of the quantitative data was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, whereas the Fleiss kappa was calculated for qualitative data.

Results

Linear and angular measurements carried out on 2D and 3D images showed excellent inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. The 2D photographs displayed the highest combined total error for linear measurements. SPG performed better than LS, with borderline significance (P=0.052). The qualitative assessment showed no significant differences among the 2D and 3D imaging modalities.

Conclusion

SPG was found to a reliable and accurate tool for the morphological evaluation of soft tissue in comparison to 2D imaging and laser scanning.