1
|
Kendal S, Louch G, Walker L, Shafiq S, Halligan D, Brierley-Jones L, Baker J. Implementing and evaluating patient-focused safety technology on adult acute mental health wards. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2024; 31:742-754. [PMID: 38279658 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.13028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT Mental health wards can feel unsafe. We know that patients and staff have different ideas about what makes a hospital ward safe or unsafe. Patients are often the first to know when the atmosphere on a ward becomes tense, but often, no one asks them for their views. Patients and staff are experts and should be included in discussions about how to make wards safer. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE We got together with some service users and staff, and made an app that helps patients to tell staff when they are not feeling safe on a mental health ward. We tried it out on six wards and we asked patients and staff what they thought. The app was easy to use and most people liked the look of it. Patients said staff did not talk with them enough and so they liked using the app. However, some staff said they could tell how patients were feeling without an app and so they did not need it. Ward managers told us that staff were often very busy and did not always have time to use the app. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This app could help staff know straightaway when patients do not feel safe on the ward, so that they can act quickly to calm things down. To make the most of the app, staff need to get used to it and bring it into ward routines. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Safety improvement on mental health wards is of international concern. It should incorporate patient perspectives. AIM Implementation and evaluation of 'WardSonar', a digital safety-monitoring tool for adult acute mental health wards, developed with stakeholders to communicate patients' real-time safety perceptions to staff. METHOD Six acute adult mental health wards in England implemented the tool in 2022. Evaluation over 10 weeks involved qualitative interviews (34 patients, 33 staff), 39 focused ethnographic observations, and analysis of pen portraits. RESULTS Implementation and evaluation of the WardSonar tool was feasible despite challenging conditions. Most patients valued the opportunity to communicate their immediate safety concerns, stating that staff had a poor understanding of them. Some staff said the WardSonar tool could help enhanced ward safety but recognised a need to incorporate its use into daily routines. Others said they did not need the tool to understand patients' safety concerns. DISCUSSION Foreseeable challenges, including staff ambivalence and practical issues, appeared intensified by the post-COVID-19 context. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The WardSonar tool could improve ward safety, especially from patients' perspectives. Future implementation could support staff to use the real-time data to inform proactive safety interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gemma Louch
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baker J, Kendal S, Bojke C, Louch G, Halligan D, Shafiq S, Sturley C, Walker L, Brown M, Berzins K, Brierley-Jones L, O'Hara JK, Blackwell K, Wormald G, Canvin K, Vincent C. A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-182. [PMID: 38794956 DOI: 10.3310/udbq8402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Acute inpatient mental health services report high levels of safety incidents. The application of patient safety theory has been sparse, particularly concerning interventions that proactively seek patient perspectives. Objective(s) Develop and evaluate a theoretically based, digital monitoring tool to collect real-time information from patients on acute adult mental health wards about their perceptions of ward safety. Design Theory-informed mixed-methods study. A prototype digital monitoring tool was developed from a co-design approach, implemented in hospital settings, and subjected to qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Setting and methods Phase 1: scoping review of the literature on patient involvement in safety interventions in acute mental health care; evidence scan of digital technology in mental health contexts; qualitative interviews with mental health patients and staff about perspectives on ward safety. This, alongside stakeholder engagement with advisory groups, service users and health professionals, informed the development processes. Most data collection was virtual. Phase 1 resulted in the technical development of a theoretically based digital monitoring tool that collected patient feedback for proactive safety monitoring. Phase 2: implementation of the tool in six adult acute mental health wards across two UK NHS trusts; evaluation via focused ethnography and qualitative interviews. Statistical analysis of WardSonar data and routine ward data involving construction of an hour-by-hour data set per ward, permitting detailed analysis of the use of the WardSonar tool. Participants A total of 8 patients and 13 mental health professionals participated in Phase 1 interviews; 33 staff and 34 patients participated in Phase 2 interviews. Interventions Patients could use a web application (the WardSonar tool) to record real-time perceptions of ward safety. Staff could access aggregated, anonymous data to inform timely interventions. Results Coronavirus disease 2019 restrictions greatly impacted the study. Stakeholder engagement permeated the project. Phase 1 delivered a theory-based, collaboratively designed digital tool for proactive patient safety monitoring. Phase 2 showed that the tool was user friendly and broadly acceptable to patients and staff. The aggregated safety data were infrequently used by staff. Feasibility depended on engaged staff and embedding use of the tool in ward routines. There is strong evidence that an incident leads to increased probability of further incidents within the next 4 hours. This puts a measure on the extent to which social/behavioural contagion persists. There is weak evidence to suggest that an incident leads to a greater use of the WardSonar tool in the following hour, but none to suggest that ward atmosphere predicts future incidents. Therefore, how often patients use the tool seems to send a stronger signal about potential incidents than patients' real-time reports about ward atmosphere. Limitations Implementation was limited to two NHS trusts. Coronavirus disease 2019 impacted design processes including stakeholder engagement; implementation; and evaluation of the monitoring tool in routine clinical practice. Higher uptake could enhance validity of the results. Conclusions WardSonar has the potential to provide a valuable route for patients to communicate safety concerns. The WardSonar monitoring tool has a strong patient perspective and uses proactive real-time safety monitoring rather than traditional retrospective data review. Future work The WardSonar tool can be refined and tested further in a post Coronavirus disease 2019 context. Study registration This study is registered as ISRCTN14470430. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128070) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 14. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Baker
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Kendal
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Chris Bojke
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gemma Louch
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Daisy Halligan
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Saba Shafiq
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Lauren Walker
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Mark Brown
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kathryn Berzins
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Jane K O'Hara
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Gemma Wormald
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Krysia Canvin
- School of Healthcare, Baines Wing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Charles Vincent
- Social Spider CIC, The Mill (Community Centre), London, UK
- Thrive by Design, Leeds, UK
- University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maben J, Taylor C, Jagosh J, Carrieri D, Briscoe S, Klepacz N, Mattick K. Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-171. [PMID: 38662367 DOI: 10.3310/twdu4109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Nurses, midwives and paramedics are the largest collective group of clinical staff in the National Health Service and have some of the highest prevalence of psychological ill-health. Existing literature tends to be profession-specific and focused on individual interventions that place responsibility for good psychological health with nurses, midwives and paramedics themselves. Aim To improve understanding of how, why and in what contexts nurses, midwives and paramedics experience work-related psychological ill-health; and determine which high-quality interventions can be implemented to minimise psychological ill-health in these professions. Methods Realist synthesis methodology consistent with realist and meta-narrative evidence syntheses: evolving standards' reporting guidelines. Data sources First round database searching in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online Database ALL (via Ovid), cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature database (via EBSCO) and health management information consortium database (via Ovid), was undertaken between February and March 2021, followed by supplementary searching strategies (e.g. hand searching, expert solicitation of key papers). Reverse chronology screening was applied, aimed at retaining 30 relevant papers in each profession. Round two database searches (December 2021) targeted COVID-19-specific literature and literature reviews. No date limits were applied. Results We built on seven key reports and included 75 papers in the first round (26 nursing, 26 midwifery, 23 paramedic) plus 44 expert solicitation papers, 29 literature reviews and 49 COVID-19 focused articles in the second round. Through the realist synthesis we surfaced 14 key tensions in the literature and identified five key findings, supported by 26 context mechanism and outcome configurations. The key findings identified the following: (1) interventions are fragmented, individual-focused and insufficiently recognise cumulative chronic stressors; (2) it is difficult to promote staff psychological wellness where there is a blame culture; (3) the needs of the system often override staff well-being at work ('serve and sacrifice'); (4) there are unintended personal costs of upholding and implementing values at work; and (5) it is challenging to design, identify and implement interventions to work optimally for diverse staff groups with diverse and interacting stressors. Conclusions Our realist synthesis strongly suggests the need to improve the systemic working conditions and the working lives of nurses, midwives and paramedics to improve their psychological well-being. Individual, one-off psychological interventions are unlikely to succeed alone. Psychological ill-health is highly prevalent in these staff groups (and can be chronic and cumulative as well as acute) and should be anticipated and prepared for, indeed normalised and expected. Healthcare organisations need to (1) rebalance the working environment to enable healthcare professionals to recover and thrive; (2) invest in multi-level system approaches to promote staff psychological well-being; and use an organisational diagnostic framework, such as the NHS England and NHS Improvement Health and Wellbeing framework, to self-assess and implement a systems approach to staff well-being. Future work Future research should implement, refine and evaluate systemic interventional strategies. Interventions and evaluations should be co-designed with front-line staff and staff experts by experience, and tailored where possible to local, organisational and workforce needs. Limitations The literature was not equivalent in size and quality across the three professions and we did not carry out citation searches using hand searching and stakeholder/expert suggestions to augment our sample. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020172420. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020172420. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129528) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 9. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Maben
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Cath Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Justin Jagosh
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Daniele Carrieri
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Naomi Klepacz
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Wessex, Southampton, UK
| | - Karen Mattick
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kerins J, Smith SE, Stirling SA, Wakeling J, Tallentire VR. Transfer of training from an internal medicine boot camp to the workplace: enhancing and hindering factors. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:485. [PMID: 34503500 PMCID: PMC8428956 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02911-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transfer of training to the workplace is the aim of training interventions. Three primary factors influence transfer: trainee characteristics, training design and work environment influences. Within medical education, the work environment factors influencing transfer of training remain underexplored. Burke and Hutchins' review of training transfer outlined five work environment influences: opportunity to perform, supervisor/peer support, strategic link, transfer climate and accountability. This study aimed to explore the ways in which work environment factors influence the transfer of training for medical trainees. METHODS Internal Medicine Training in Scotland includes a three-day boot camp involving simulation-based mastery learning of procedural skills, immersive simulation scenarios and communication workshops. Following ethical approval, trainees were invited to take part in interviews at least three months after following their boot camp. Interviews were semi-structured, anonymised, transcribed verbatim and analysed using template analysis. Member checking interviews were performed to verify findings. RESULTS A total of 26 trainees took part in interviews between January 2020 and January 2021. Trainees reported a lack of opportunities to perform procedures in the workplace and challenges relating to the transfer climate, including a lack of appropriate equipment and resistance to change in the workplace. Trainees described a strong sense of personal responsibility to transfer and they felt empowered to change practice in response to the challenges faced. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights barriers to transfer of training within the clinical workplace including procedural opportunities, a transfer climate with challenging equipment availability and, at times, an unsupportive workplace culture. Trainees are driven by their own sense of personal responsibility; medical educators and healthcare leaders must harness this enthusiasm and take heed of the barriers to assist in the development of strategies to overcome them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kerins
- Scottish Centre for Simulation and Clinical Human Factors, Stirling Road, Scotland FK5 4WR Larbert, UK
| | | | | | | | - Victoria Ruth Tallentire
- Scottish Centre for Simulation and Clinical Human Factors, Stirling Road, Scotland FK5 4WR Larbert, UK
- NHS Lothian, Scotland Edinburgh, UK
- NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lantta T, Anttila M, Varpula J, Välimäki M. Facilitators for improvement of psychiatric services and barriers in implementing changes: From the perspective of Finnish patients and family members. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30:506-523. [PMID: 33216435 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The need for psychiatric patients and their family members to have access to quality user-friendly services has been studied for decades, yet few improvements have been made in treatment services. This study aims to explain how patients and family members have experienced facilitators of improvements, and their thoughts about barriers in the implementation of changes. An explanatory qualitative design was adopted. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with eight focus groups made up of a total of 35 participants from mental health associations in Finland. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the deductive data analysis. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) was followed in the study. Participants in patient and family member associations had similar experiences and thoughts about facilitators of improvements in psychiatric services and barriers in the implementation of changes. For example, both participant groups experienced that promoting more positive roles of professionals could facilitate improvements in psychiatric care. On the other hand, a lack of theoretical competence and interpersonal skills of professionals could hinder change. We conclude that many of the facilitators that patients and families suggested could be addressed by enhancing collaboration and communication, having a more person-centred approach, focusing on recovery throughout the course of care, and acknowledging staff's well-being at work. Second, the barriers to implementing changes centre around the limited knowledge and skills of staff, and a paternalistic system that focuses on managing risk and administering treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jaakko Varpula
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laker C, Cella M, Agbediro D, Callard F, Wykes T. The side effects of service changes: exploring the longitudinal impact of participation in a randomised controlled trial (DOORWAYS) on staff perceptions of barriers to change. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:407. [PMID: 31852502 PMCID: PMC6921549 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2370-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staff and service users have expressed concerns that service improvements in British mental health wards have been slow or transient. It is possible that certain changes are positive for some (e.g. service users), but negative for others (e.g. staff), which may affect implementation success. In this study, we explore whether a programme of change to improve the therapeutic milieu on mental health wards influenced staff perceptions of barriers to change, 12 months after implementation. METHOD A cluster randomised controlled trial called DOORWAYS was conducted on eight British, inner-city acute mental health wards. Randomisation was achieved using a list randomly generated by a computer. A psychologist trained ward staff (mainly nurses) to deliver evidence-based groups and supported their initial implementation. The impact of these changes was measured over 12 months (when 4 wards were randomised), according to nurses' perceptions of barriers to change (VOCALISE), using unstructured multivariate linear regression models. This innovative analysis method allows maximum use of data in randomised controlled trials with reduced sample sizes due to substantial drop out rates. The contextual influences of occupational status (staff) and of workplace setting (ward) were also considered. RESULTS Staff who participated in the intervention had significantly worse perceptions of barriers to change at follow up. The perceptions of staff in the control group did not change over time. In both groups (N = 120), direct care staff had more negative perceptions of barriers to change, and perceptions varied according to ward. Across time, direct care staff in the intervention group became more negative than those in the control group. CONCLUSION Participation in this program of change, worsened staff perceptions of barriers to change. In addition, occupational status (being from the direct care group) had a negative effect on perceptions of barriers to change, an effect that continued across time and was worse in the intervention group. Those providing direct care should be offered extra support when changes are introduced and through the implementation process. More effort should be placed around reducing the perceived burden of innovation for staff in mental health wards. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN 06545047. Registered 29/04/2010, https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=06545047.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Laker
- Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford Campus, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 1SQ, UK.
| | - Matteo Cella
- Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, PO77, Room 2.11, London Henry Wellcome Building, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Deborah Agbediro
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Felicity Callard
- Birkbeck, Department of Psychosocial Studies, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HX, UK
| | - Til Wykes
- Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, PO77, Room 2.11, London Henry Wellcome Building, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, BR3 3BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|