Creating Inclusive Health Systems for People With Intellectual Disabilities: An International Study

Exploring Implementation of Reasonable Adjustments in Hospitals for People With Intellectual Disability: Using a Realist Lens

AIM

To explore the factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in hospitals for people with intellectual disability: using a realist lens.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using a realist lens.

METHODS

Data collection involved one focus group interview and three semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals working in hospital or community settings in September 2023. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and findings were mapped to the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework across the dimension's context, implementation and setting.

RESULTS

Healthcare professionals support the provision of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals as a person-centred approach to caring for people with intellectual disability. While reasonable adjustments are evident in practice, they are mostly individual-level cases with little evidence of strategic system-level implementation. The factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in practice were conceptualised using the CICI framework. Context factors spanned the domains of epidemiological (e.g., ageing population), socio-cultural (e.g., historical healthcare), political (e.g., lack of integrated care pathways) and ethical (e.g., provision of person-centred care). Implementation factors spanned the domains of strategies (e.g., leadership strategies), agents (e.g., liaison and advocacy roles) and outcomes (e.g., individual-level reasonable adjustments). The setting for the complex intervention was the acute hospital. System-level indicators for successful implementation include intellectual disability specific policies/procedures for integrated care pathways, education and awareness training for hospital staff, and leadership strategies such as the development of liaison nursing roles and the appropriate allocation of physical and human resources.

CONCLUSION

A radical change is needed where implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals are broadened beyond isolated individual-level cases to system-level healthcare. This research highlights the importance of exploring the integrated dimensions of context, implementation and setting in complex interventions such as reasonable adjustments and sets foundation for further implementation research in this area.

IMPACT

Reasonable adjustments at the system-level within acute hospitals would promote person-centred care and help address the inequities and health disparities experienced by people with intellectual disability. This research uses a realist lens to explore the factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals for people with intellectual disability. The factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in practice were conceptualised using the CICI framework across the dimensions of context (domains epidemiological, socio-cultural, political and ethical), implementation (domains strategies, agents and outcomes) and setting. System-level indicators for successful implementation include intellectual disability specific policies/procedures for integrated care pathways, education and awareness training for hospital staff, and leadership strategies such as the development of liaison nursing roles and the appropriate allocation of physical and human resources. This research highlights the importance of exploring the integrated dimensions of context, implementation and setting of complex interventions such as reasonable adjustments and sets a foundation for further implementation research in this area.

REPORTING METHOD

This research adhered to the Equator research reporting guideline: standards for reporting qualitative research.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A parent of a child with intellectual disability was involved in the conduct of this research, specifically in the design, data collection and preparation of the manuscript.

Parents' perspectives on reasonable adjustments in acute healthcare for people with intellectual disability: A qualitative descriptive study

AIM

To describe parents' perspectives on reasonable adjustments in acute healthcare for people with intellectual disability (ID).

BACKGROUND

People with ID are vulnerable in terms of their health needs and marginalized when accessing and utilizing acute healthcare services. Reasonable adjustments are positive measures that can help alleviate health disparities. However, despite significant research advocating their use, evidence of implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute healthcare practice is limited.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with six parents of children with ID, who had accessed and used acute healthcare services. The interviews were conducted between January and May 2022, audio-recordings were transcribed and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Parents described limited or no experiences of reasonable adjustments when accessing or utilizing acute healthcare services for their children. The findings are captured in three themes; describing the reality, understanding the impact and signposting the future. The findings highlight a lack of implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute healthcare which negatively impacts the experience of all stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

There is a pressing need for reasonable adjustments to be implemented at a strategic level across acute healthcare services, so that people with ID and their families can access person-centred acute healthcare when needed.

IMPACT

The research findings will inform researchers interested in reasonable adjustments and implementation research, and those interested in advocating for the rights of people with ID.

REPORTING METHOD

This study adhered to the Equator research reporting checklist: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A parent of a child with an ID was part of the research team informing the design, data collection, data analysis and write-up of this article.

"I am not a number!" Opinions and preferences of people with intellectual disability about genetic healthcare

There is limited research exploring the knowledge and experiences of genetic healthcare from the perspective of people with intellectual disability. This study, conducted in New South Wales (Australia), addresses this gap. Eighteen adults with intellectual disability and eight support people were interviewed in this inclusive research study. The transcribed interviews were analysed using inductive content analysis. The findings were discussed in a focus group with ten adults with intellectual disability and in three multi-stakeholder advisory workshops, contributing to the validity and trustworthiness of the findings. Five main themes emerged: (i) access to genetic healthcare services is inequitable, with several barriers to the informed consent process; (ii) the experiences and opinions of people with intellectual disability are variable, including frustration, exclusion and fear; (iii) genetic counselling and diagnoses can be profoundly impactful, but translating a genetic diagnosis into tailored healthcare, appropriate support, peer connections and reproductive planning faces barriers; (iv) people with intellectual disability have a high incidence of exposure to trauma and some reported that their genetic healthcare experiences were associated with further trauma; (v) recommendations for a more respectful and inclusive model of genetic healthcare. Co-designed point-of-care educational and consent resources, accompanied by tailored professional education for healthcare providers, are required to improve the equity and appropriateness of genetic healthcare for people with intellectual disability.

Exploring views on medical care for people with intellectual disabilities: an international concept mapping study

Background

Medical care for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is organized differently across the globe and interpretation of the concept of medical care for people with IDD may vary across countries. Existing models of medical care are not tailored to the specific medical care needs of people with IDD. This study aims to provide an improved understanding of which aspects constitute medical care for people with IDD by exploring how international researchers and practitioners describe this care, using concept mapping.

Methods

Twenty-five experts (researchers and practitioners) on medical care for people with IDD from 17 countries submitted statements on medical care in their country in a brainstorming session, using an online concept mapping tool. Next, they sorted all collected statements and rated them on importance.

Results

Participants generated statements that reflect current medical and health care practice, their ideas on good practice, and aspirations for future medical and health care for people with IDD. Based on the sorting of all statements, a concept map was formed, covering 13 aspects that characterize medical and health care for people with IDD across nations. The 13 aspects varied minimally in importance ratings and were grouped into five overarching conceptual themes: (i) active patient role, (ii) provider role, (iii) context of care, (iv) consequences of care for people with IDD, and (v) quality of care.

Conclusions

The themes, clusters and statements identified through this explorative study provide additional content and context for the specific patient group of people with IDD to the dimensions of previous models of medical care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-022-01700-w.

People with intellectual disability in Ireland are still dying young

Background

People with intellectual disability die younger than their non‐disabled peers. In recent years, greater attention has been paid to closing the gap. However, evidence that this is being achieved is limited by the dearth of longitudinal, national data.

Method

Over 4,000 decedents identified in the Irish National Intellectual Disability Database from 2001 to 2016 were compared to deaths in the general population based on age and gender profiles using death rates and standardised mortality ratios. A binary logistic regression analysis also identified the characteristics of persons who had a higher risk of dying.

Results

Irish people with intellectual disability die younger and have a higher rate of death than their non‐disabled peers. Nor has the gap between their mortality and that of the general population closed in recent years.

Conclusions

More concentrated effort is needed in Ireland on promoting equitable access to health services for people with intellectual disability.