Effects of Physical Appearance Social Comparisons and Perceived Attainability of an Ideal Body on Body Dissatisfaction and Weight‐Management Behaviors Among Young Japanese Women

Validity of self-reported height, weight and BMI as applied to trends in malnutrition in Davao City, Philippines

BACKGROUND

Self-reported height, weight and body mass index (BMI) data are widely used to monitor trends in malnutrition. However, several studies expressed concerns about its reliability-citing trends of over-reporting and underreporting anthropometric data. This study aims to: (1) identify the validity of self-reported height and weight and BMI as compared with measured values and (2) examine the potential recurrence of malnutrition in an urban-based population.

METHODS

Paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation coefficients were conducted to identify potential discrepancies between self-reported and measured anthropometric data. These values were collected among 255 male and 400 female participants in the Davao City.

RESULTS

Height overestimation in females and underestimation in males were observed to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). Researchers also note an alarming rise in malnutrition cases when the Asia-Pacific Index was applied to the BMI study data. A 40.79 and 22% increase in obese cases among male and female respondents were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Modifying participant-gathered height and weight values is likely to result in discrepancies between self-reported and measured values. Identifying a person's height and weight status is crucial to understanding who among the population experience malnutrition. Thus, policymakers are called to strengthen educational support that trains respondents to report reliable and valid health data.

Appearance Comparisons, Affect, Body Dissatisfaction and Eating Pathology in Portuguese Female University Students

Physical appearance comparisons have been theorized to be associated with negative indicators of body image. This study aimed to study appearance comparisons and their association to affect, body dissatisfaction, and eating pathology. Three hundred and ten female university students with ages between 17 and 25 years (M = 20.2, SD = 1.9) completed sociodemographic and clinical data, self-reported questionnaires, and questions about appearance comparisons. Among the participants, 98.71% reported making appearance comparisons, and 42.15% of these reported making them frequently or always. Higher reported frequencies of appearance comparisons were related to higher levels of body dissatisfaction, negative affect, and eating pathology. Appearance comparisons to acquaintances were the most frequent. Comparisons in person and through media were reported in similar proportions. Upward comparisons were more frequent than lateral and downward comparisons and were related to higher levels of body dissatisfaction than downward comparisons and to higher levels of body dissatisfaction, negative affect, and eating pathology than lateral comparisons. Upward comparisons to close peers were associated with higher body dissatisfaction as opposed to models/celebrities. Results, limitations, and implications are discussed.

Testing of a model for risk factors for eating disorders and higher weight among emerging adults: Baseline evaluation

Although a range of risk factors have been identified for disordered eating and weight status, the breadth of risk factors have been rarely considered within a single, comprehensive model. The robustness of these findings across countries also remains an open question. The present study sampled 6272 participants aged 18-30 years from eight countries in an attempt to evaluate combined and unique predictors for these two conditions, and to explore possible cross-country differences in these models. Participants completed a range of demographic, biological, behavioral, psychological, and sociocultural measures to test a comprehensive model of the contributions of these predictors for disordered eating and weight-related constructs (binge eating, body mass index, compensatory behaviors, dietary restraint, drive for muscularity, and drive for leanness). Structural invariance testing within a multigroup path analysis framework revealed that a single model across the eight countries provided poor model fit. Freeing of 22% of parameters across countries provided excellent fit and a satisfactory compromise for country-invariant and country-variant parameters in the model. Overall, predictors accounted for between 15% and 60% of variance in the outcome measures, with lowest explained variance for the disordered eating outcomes. Significant unique contributions to prediction were observed for each of the five risk factor variable types and across the eight countries. Thus, the findings show strong support for this model as an explanatory framework of both disordered eating and weight status.