Patients with chronic periodontitis present increased risk for osteoporosis: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan

Oral microbiome, periodontal disease and systemic bone-related diseases in the era of homeostatic medicine

BACKGROUND

Homeostasis is a state of self-regulation and dynamic equilibrium, maintaining the good physiological functions of each system in living organisms. In the oral cavity, the interaction between the host and the oral microbiome forms oral microbial homeostasis. Physiological bone remodeling and renewal can occur under the maintenance of oral microbial homeostasis. The imbalance of bone homeostasis is a key mechanism leading to the occurrence of systemic bone-related diseases. Considering the importance of oral microbial homeostasis in the maintenance of bone homeostasis, it still lacks a complete understanding of the relationship between oral microbiome, periodontal disease and systemic bone-related diseases.

AIM OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the homeostatic changes, pathogenic routes and potential mechanisms in the oral microbiome in periodontal disease and systemic bone-related diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and osteomyelitis. Additionally, this review discusses oral microbiome-based diagnostic approaches and explores probiotics, mesenchymal stem cells, and oral microbiome transplantation as promising treatment strategies.

KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW

This review highlights the association between oral microbial homeostasis imbalance and systemic bone-related diseases, and highlights the possibility of remodeling oral microbial homeostasis for the prevention and treatment of systemic bone-related diseases.

Periodontitis and osteoporosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

The incidences of periodontitis and osteoporosis are rising worldwide. Observational studies have shown that periodontitis is associated with increased risk of osteoporosis. We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to genetically investigate the causality of periodontitis on osteoporosis. We explored the causal effect of periodontitis on osteoporosis by MR analysis. A total of 9 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were related to periodontitis. The primary approach in this MR analysis was the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method. Simple median, weighted median, and penalized weighted median were used to analyze sensitivity. The fixed-effect IVW model and random-effect IVW model showed no significant causal effect of genetically predicted periodontitis on the risk of osteoporosis (OR=1.032; 95%CI: 0.923-1.153; P=0.574; OR=1.032; 95%CI: 0.920-1.158; P=0.588, respectively). Similar results were observed in simple mode (OR=1.031; 95%CI: 0.780-1.361, P=0.835), weighted mode (OR=1.120; 95%CI: 0.944-1.328, P=0.229), simple median (OR=1.003; 95%CI: 0.839-1.197, P=0.977), weighted median (OR=1.078; 95%CI: 0.921-1.262, P=0.346), penalized weight median (OR 1.078; 95%CI: 0.919-1.264, P=0.351), and MR-Egger method (OR=1.360; 95%CI: 0.998-1.853, P=0.092). There was no heterogeneity in the IVW and MR-Egger analyses (Q=7.454, P=0.489 and Q=3.901, P=0.791, respectively). MR-Egger regression revealed no evidence of a pleiotropic influence through genetic variants (intercept: -0.004; P=0.101). The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis indicated no driven influence of any individual SNP on the association between periodontitis and osteoporosis. The Mendelian randomization analysis did not show a significant detrimental effect of periodontitis on the risk of osteoporosis.

General and local predictors of mandibular cortical bone morphology in adult females and males: the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study

OBJECTIVES

To analyze factors predicting mandibular cortical width (MCW) and mandibular cortical index (MCI) in adult females and males.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on 427 females and 335 males aged 40-84 from The Tromsø study: Tromsø7 were used. T-score, age, menopausal status (for females), remaining teeth, and periodontal status were analyzed in linear and logistic regression analyses as predictors of MCW and MCI, respectively.

RESULTS

T-score, age, and the number of remaining teeth significantly predicted MCW in females but not males. Standardized β coefficients were 0.286, -0.231, and 0.131, respectively. The linear regression model explained 24% of MCW variation in females. MCI in females was significantly predicted by T-score, age, and remaining teeth with the Wald values of 9.65, 6.17, and 5.83, respectively. The logistic regression model explained 16.3-23% of the variation in MCI in females. In males, T-score was the only significant predictor of the eroded cortex, and the logistic model explained only 4.3-5.8% of the variation in MCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The T-score demonstrated a stronger relationship with MCW and MCI than other factors in females, which supports the usefulness of those indices for osteoporosis screening. Conversely, the T-score exhibited no association with MCW and remained the only significant predictor of MCI in males, yet to a lesser extent than in females.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding factors affecting mandibular cortical morphology is essential for further investigations of MCW and MCI usefulness for osteoporosis screening in females and males.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Periodontitis: Bidirectional Association in Population-based 15-year Retrospective Cohorts

OBJECTIVE

A two-way relationship between periodontitis and diabetes has been proposed. However, bidirectional epidemiological observation is limited and inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

Using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan (covering over 99% of the entire population), we aimed to estimate the development of diabetes in periodontitis patients or that of periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), respectively.

METHODS

A total of 11 011 patients with severe periodontitis were recruited from 2000 to 2015. After matching by age, sex, and index date, 11 011 patients with mild periodontitis and 11 011 non-periodontitis controls were registered. Additionally, 157 798 patients with T2DM and 157 798 non-T2DM controls were enrolled, in whom the development of periodontitis was traced. Cox proportional hazards model was performed.

RESULTS

Periodontitis patients tended to have a statistically high risk for T2DM. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.94 (95% CI, 1.49-2.63, P < .01) and 1.72 (95% CI, 1.24-2.52, P < .01) for severe and mild periodontitis groups, respectively. The patients with severe periodontitis had a higher risk of having T2DM relative to those with mild periodontitis (1.17 [95% CI, 1.04-1.26, P < .001]). Conversely, the risk of periodontitis increased significantly in patients with T2DM (1.99 [95% CI, 1.42-2.48, P < .01]). However, high risk was observed for the outcome of severe periodontitis (2.08 [95% CI, 1.50-2.66, P < .001]), but not for mild periodontitis (0.97 [95% CI, 0.38-1.57, P = .462]).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the bidirectional association is between T2DM and severe but not mild periodontitis.

Periodontitis and risk of immune-mediated systemic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this review is to examine and quantify the long-term risk of immune-mediated systemic conditions in people with periodontitis compared to people without periodontitis.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched up to June 2022 using keywords and MeSH headings. The 'Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions' tool was used to assess bias. Cohort studies comparing incident metabolic/autoimmune/inflammatory diseases in periodontitis to healthy controls were included. Meta-analysis and meta-regression quantified risks and showed impact of periodontitis diagnosis type and severity.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 3354 studies; 166 studies were eligible for full-text screening, and 30 studies were included for review. Twenty-seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The risks of diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoporosis were increased in people with periodontitis compared to without periodontitis (diabetes-relative risk [RR]: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.33; RA-RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07-1.52; osteoporosis-RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.12-1.75). Risk of diabetes showed gradient increase by periodontitis severity (moderate-RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.11-1.31; severe-RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10-1.63).

CONCLUSION

People with moderate-to-severe cases of periodontitis have the highest risk of developing diabetes, while the effect of periodontal severity on risk of other immune-mediated systemic conditions requires further investigation. More homologous evidence is required to form robust conclusions regarding periodontitis-multimorbidity associations.

Exploring the Role of IL-17A in Oral Dysbiosis-Associated Periodontitis and Its Correlation with Systemic Inflammatory Disease

Oral microbiota play a pivotal role in maintaining homeostasis, safeguarding the oral cavity, and preventing the onset of disease. Oral dysbiosis has the potential to trigger pro-inflammatory effects and immune dysregulation, which can have a negative impact on systemic health. It is regarded as a key etiological factor for periodontitis. The emergence and persistence of oral dysbiosis have been demonstrated to mediate inflammatory pathology locally and at distant sites. The heightened inflammation observed in oral dysbiosis is dependent upon the secretion of interleukin-17A (IL-17A) by various innate and adaptive immune cells. IL-17A has been found to play a significant role in host defense mechanisms by inducing antibacterial peptides, recruiting neutrophils, and promoting local inflammation via cytokines and chemokines. This review seeks to present the current knowledge on oral dysbiosis and its prevention, as well as the underlying role of IL-17A in periodontitis induced by oral dysbiosis and its impact on systemic inflammatory disease.

The relationship between FOSB and SOCS3 gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility to periodontitis and osteopenia in the Chinese population

The aim is to analyze the relationship and significance of the FOS, FOSB, Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) gene loci and their polymorphisms with periodontitis and osteopenia in the Chinese population. In this case-control study, data on questionnaires, periodontal examination, bone mineral density, and FOS, FOSB, SOCS3, and HIF1 gene loci and their polymorphisms were obtained from 474 participants. The data were analyzed using the analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ² test, and logistic regression. The incidence of osteopenia was significantly increased in patients with periodontitis compared to controls (58.6 vs. 34.4%, P < 0.001). Accordingly, the risk was increased 2.21-fold compared with controls (95% CI 2.09-4.95). Osteopenia patients had a significantly higher risk of periodontitis than patients with normal bone density (OR = 3.22, 95% CI 2.09-4.94). There were significant positive associations between FOSB and SOCS3 polymorphisms and periodontitis and osteopenia susceptibility. Individuals carrying the G/G genotype of the FOSB gene rs708905 locus had an increased risk of periodontitis (OR = 5.06, 95% CI 2.36-10.86) and osteopenia (OR = 3.26, 95% CI 1.34-7.96). Compared with the C/C genotype, the A/A genotype of the FOSB rs8105114 locus was associated with a significantly higher risk of periodontitis (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.02-4.53) and osteopenia (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.12-7.22). Compared with the A/A genotype, the risk of periodontitis in the G/G genotype of the SOCS3 rs7207782 locus was increased 3.10-fold (P < 0.001), and the risk of osteopenia was increased 2.01-fold (P = 0.023). There was a bidirectional relationship between periodontitis and osteopenia. The rs708905 G/G and rs8105114 A/A genotypes of FOSB and the rs7207782 G/G genotype of SOCS3 were risk factors for both periodontitis and osteopenia in the Chinese population, which could increase knowledge about disease‑specific and cross‑disease genetic pattern.

Association of periodontitis with tinnitus: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan

AIM

Tinnitus, ringing in the ears, is speculated to be driven by inflammation. This study examined whether periodontitis is a risk factor for tinnitus using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 79,456 patients who visited for dental concerns, 11,055 patients who were diagnosed with periodontitis and underwent periodontal treatment between 2000 and 2015 were enrolled in Group 1. After matching for sex, age, and index year, 11,055 patients with periodontitis who received no treatment were enrolled in Group 2. Similarly, 11,055 participants without periodontitis were included as controls.

RESULTS

At the end of the follow-up, 412 and 404 participants in the two periodontitis groups and 321 participants in the control group had tinnitus. Cumulative risk for tinnitus in Group 1 or 2 was significantly greater than in the control group. More periodontitis patients than controls developed tinnitus (adjusted hazard ratios were 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-1.97, p < .001) and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.37-1.86, p < .001) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). The risks were not significantly different between Groups 1 and 2. Similar findings were obtained after excluding data for the first 1 or 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicate that periodontitis is associated with tinnitus.

Association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease among menopausal women: The 2013-2015 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease among Korean menopausal women, as well as the association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease according to duration after menopause.

METHODS

Of a total of 22,948 subjects who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from 2013 to 2015 the final study population was limited to 2,573 subjects with no missing values. The subjects were divided into two groups, normal bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis, according to the T-score obtained from bone densitometry. Scores of ≥ 3 points for the community periodontal index of treatment needs were reclassified as periodontal disease. Moreover, after stratification of the variable 'duration after menopause' into 0-4, 5-9, and ≥10 years, binary logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease according to the duration after menopause.

RESULTS

There was an association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease. The osteoporosis group had an adjusted odds ratio [OR] of 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.56) for periodontal disease compared to the normal BMD group. Of note, the osteoporosis group in the menopausal transition stage (0-4 years after menopause) showed an adjusted OR of 2.08 (95% CI: 1.15-3.77) for developing periodontal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis was associated with periodontal disease and the association was strongest among women in the menopausal transition stage, 0-4 years after menopause. Oral health promotion, including regular oral examination and oral hygiene care, is particularly useful for menopausal transition women with osteoporosis.

Influence of symptomatic periodontal disease on changes in skeletal bone density during medication therapy for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04 and JOINT-05

Japanese postmenopausal women with symptomatic periodontal disease had a significantly smaller increase in the T-score for total hip bone density than those without periodontal disease during medication therapy for osteoporosis. Intervention to treat symptomatic periodontal disease before and/or during osteoporosis therapy could maintain the effect of osteoporosis medications.

PURPOSE

Women with periodontal disease may be more likely to develop osteoporosis. We evaluated whether the presence of symptomatic periodontal disease can influence changes in skeletal bone mineral density (BMD) during medication therapy for osteoporosis in Japanese postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A total of 4,258 postmenopausal women participated in the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-04 trial) and number 5 (JOINT-05 trial), which were multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trials in Japan. Of these, 3,670 non-edentulous subjects participated in the study. Subjects who had self-reported symptoms of periodontal disease at baseline were defined as having periodontal disease. The study outcome was the difference in BMD changes during the study between subjects with and without periodontal disease. Mixed models for repeated measures after adjusting for covariates were used to investigate the difference in the BMD changes during the study between subjects with and without periodontal disease.

RESULTS

Subjects with periodontal disease had significantly lower T-scores for total hip (p = 0.035) and metacarpal (p = 0.048) BMD than those without periodontal disease at baseline. During medication therapy for osteoporosis, subjects with periodontal disease had a significantly smaller increase in T-score for total hip BMD than those without periodontal disease (p = 0.021), although no significant differences were observed in the changes in T-scores for other skeletal BMD measurements between subjects with and without periodontal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of self-reported symptoms of periodontal disease may be associated with a decrease in the effect of osteoporosis medications in Japanese postmenopausal women.

Periodontal Inflammation and Systemic Diseases: An Overview

Periodontitis is a common inflammatory disease of infectious origins that often evolves into a chronic condition. Aside from its importance as a stomatologic ailment, chronic periodontitis has gained relevance since it has been shown that it can develop into a systemic condition characterized by unresolved hyper-inflammation, disruption of the innate and adaptive immune system, dysbiosis of the oral, gut and other location's microbiota and other system-wide alterations that may cause, coexist or aggravate other health issues associated to elevated morbi-mortality. The relationships between the infectious, immune, inflammatory, and systemic features of periodontitis and its many related diseases are far from being fully understood and are indeed still debated. However, to date, a large body of evidence on the different biological, clinical, and policy-enabling sources of information, is available. The aim of the present work is to summarize many of these sources of information and contextualize them under a systemic inflammation framework that may set the basis to an integral vision, useful for basic, clinical, and therapeutic goals.

Associations between osteoporosis and risk of periodontitis: A pooled analysis of observational studies

Background

Periodontitis and osteoporosis are most popular among aging population and both conditions might be linked, even though, this suggestion still until now debated.

Objectives

A meta‐analysis on previous investigations has been used to evaluate the correlation between periodontitis and osteoporosis to determine whether osteoporosis is a local indicator of bone loss, or whether it is depending on or related to periodontitis causes.

Methods

The literature database, including but not excluding, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Science Citation Index Expanded, was searched in this work during Feb, 2020. We conducted the investigations contain cohort studies, cross‐sectional studies, as well as case–control studies with relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and Sensitivity analysis were also applied to identify heterogeneity sources.

Results

23 observational studies with 12 cohorts, 7 cross‐sectional and 4 case–control studies, were included, together with 2,157,037 participants. Osteoporosis patients were more exposed to periodontitis (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.50–2.54). Subgroup analyses showed that the higher risk of osteoporosis in periodontitis patients exists in both cross‐sectional studies (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.80–2.61) and case–control studies (OR 2.63; 95% CI, 1.69–4.09), and marginally in cohort studies (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.16–2.49).

Conclusion

Review analyses have shown that osteoporosis is closely related to the increased risk of periodontitis in the future. Dental specialists better to understand the potential association between periodontitis and osteoporosis.

Association of chronic periodontitis with prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Association between periodontitis and prostate diseases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatitis is uncertain.

METHODS

From the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, 5,510 patients with newly diagnosed chronic periodontitis and participated in therapies were selected from 2000 to 2015 as cohort 1. Matched with age and index year, 5,510 patients with periodontitis diagnosis without therapy were selected as cohort 2, and 5,510 participants without diagnosis were used as control. Cox proportional hazard and survival analysis were performed to compare the risks and the survival probabilities among cohorts.

RESULTS

In two periodontitis cohorts, 636 and 638 participants compared with 550 in control (1,174 and 1,187 versus 989 per 100,000 person-years) had prostate disorder. Difference was identified for prostatitis (n = 68, 70 versus 34; rate = 125, 130 versus 61 /100,000 person-years; P <0.001) but not for BPH (n = 577, 575, versus 529; rate = 1,065, 1,070 versus 951 /100,000 person-years, respectively). Different survival probabilities for prostate disorder and prostatitis, but not for BPH, were observed among cohorts. Periodontitis patients were more likely to develop prostate disorder after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of 2.590 to 2.641 by competing model). With stratification, risks between two periodontitis cohorts exhibited no difference. When BPH cases were excluded, the aHRs for prostatitis were 4.611 to 4.798.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite treatment, the patients with periodontitis had higher risk of developing prostatitis than patients without periodontitis.

An investigation of the bidirectional link between osteoporosis and periodontitis

This study investigated whether periodontitis affects systemic bone status and whether FRAX® is a screening tool for periodontal disease in elderly women. The findings showed that bone density was not influenced by periodontitis and highlighted that women with FRAX® score above the intervention threshold had greater chance to present severe periodontitis.

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether periodontal disease is a predictor for systemic bone loss among elderly women. The utilization of FRAX® as a screening tool for severe periodontitis was also evaluated in this population.

METHODS

Current bone mineral density (BMD) for lumbar spine and proximal femur was used as an indicator of "bone status." Number of interdental sites with severe clinical attachment loss, frequency of bleeding on probing, and percentage of tooth loss due to periodontitis represented "periodontal disease" that was tested as a predictor of bone loss in a structural equation modeling analysis involving 110 participants. The intake of antiosteoporosis medication was considered in the analysis. Four other different criteria for periodontitis classification were also tested. FRAX® for major fracture was calculated without BMD, and with intervention threshold set by age. Longitudinally, BMD changes up to 10 years were also obtained and checked for possible association with periodontitis.

RESULTS

Periodontal disease was not a predictor for worse systemic bone status according to the different periodontal disease classifications, and was not associated with BMD changes. Antiosteoporosis medication directly predicted periodontal disease and systemic bone status. Women with FRAX® score above the intervention threshold had higher chance for periodontitis in more advanced stages: III/IV (OR = 1.13, 95% CI [1.04 to 1.22], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Periodontal disease did not constitute a predictor for reduced systemic bone density in the studied population of elderly women. On the other hand, FRAX® demonstrated to be a useful tool to suggest periodontal evaluation. Antiresorptive medication showed benefits on periodontal and bone status.

Methodological approaches for investigating links between dental and chronic diseases with claims data: A scoping study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of methodological approaches to assess the relationship between dental diseases and other noncommunicable diseases on the basis of claims data.

METHODS

Based on the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley, a scoping study was conducted. By searching electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and LILACS), appropriate articles were identified. After extracting relevant information and entering it into a data-charting form, the study characteristics and the methodological approaches were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

Fifty-one articles were identified for inclusion in the analysis. Most of the selected studies (78 percent) originated from Taiwan and employed a cohort design. The majority of studies considered dental diseases, particularly periodontal disease (PD) measures, but no common standard was identified for the definition of PD. Unmeasured confounding, misclassification, and surveillance bias were reported to be the main limitations of the claims data analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Claims data provide a very useful information source to further delineate the relationship between PDs and other noncommunicable diseases. If diagnostic codes are available, they seem to be the most suitable tool to assess PD in claims-based studies. In databases that do not contain dental diagnostic codes, e.g., databases in Germany and the United States, the identification of PD is a particular challenge. The inclusion of dental diagnostic codes in all claims databases is strongly recommended. Due to the public health relevance of PD, there is a need for more comprehensive documentation of dental parameters within claims data.

Survival rates of hybrid rough surface implants and their alveolar bone level alterations

BACKGROUND

The design of hybrid surface implants takes advantage of characteristics of two different textures to improve clinical outcomes. To date, there are limited numbers of studies reporting the clinical results of hybrid surface implants. This study aimed to assess hybrid surface implants with two different rough textures in regard to survival, marginal bone level change, and biological complications.

METHODS

Retrospective review of dental records was conducted for 161 patients who had 460 hybrid surface implants to analyze survival rate. These implants had the dual sandblasted and anode oxidized surface. Sixty patients with 192 implants who had consecutive radiographs taken at specific time points and complete clinical examinations were included in the comprehensive analysis. The associations between patient- and implant-related characteristics, and clinical results were analyzed by log-rank test, Cox regression, and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Cumulative survival at 12, 36, and 60 months after placement was 97.4%, 96.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. The average marginal bone level change from baseline to the last visit was 0.31 ± 0.68 mm and 0.34 ± 0.77 mm at the mesial and distal sites, respectively. Prevalence of peri-implantitis was 0.5% at the implant level and 1.7% at the patient level. Implant site was associated with implant failure (P = 0.03). Smoking habit, history of periodontitis, and implant site were significantly associated with marginal bone level change (P = 0.001, < 0.001, 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid rough surface implants had high survival rate, stable bone level, and low prevalence of biological complications. This surface design demonstrated promising clinical outcomes. More studies are needed to further support the clinical advantages of hybrid surface implants.