Access and attitudinal barriers to engagement in integrated primary care mental health treatment for rural populations

Perceptions of an acceptance-based weight management treatment among adults living in rural areas

Obesity and obesity-related comorbidities disproportionately affect rural communities. Research has emerged in support of a novel acceptance-based behavioural weight management treatment (ABT) that integrates the principles and procedures of acceptance-commitment therapy (ACT) with traditional components of standard behavioural treatment (SBT). The current study assessed the perceptions of community stakeholders in rural areas to session materials of a commercially available ABT program. Surveys and focus groups were used to solicit feedback from three former interventionists with experience delivering SBTs in rural counties and from 17 former participants in these programs. Qualitative responses encompassed four overarching themes: (1) recommendations to support participant engagement, (2) comments about preferences for specific ABT and SBT strategies, (3) concerns about specific aspects of treatment delivery, and (4) requests for aesthetic changes to session materials to enhance clarity and engagement. Overall, participants viewed ABT materials and concepts favourably but believed it would be important to begin the intervention with rapport building and training in traditional SBT strategies prior to delving into ACT strategies. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of ABT for weight loss in adults with obesity living in rural communities and continue to solicit feedback from rural community stakeholders.

Can You Hear Me Now? Patient Perceptions of Telehealth in a Rural Primary Care Population

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased telehealth adoption. Rural communities experience challenges relating to telehealth, including a shortage of clinicians, low health literacy, mistrust of medicine, and limited technology access, yet rural perceptions have not been a subject of robust study. The setting of this study was a rural Midwestern family medicine clinic within an academic health system. Methods: Surveys were given to all patients of age 18 or older visiting the clinic over a one-week period. Those who expressed interest were contacted for a semistructured interview. Descriptive statistics and chi-square testing were used to analyze survey results for significant relationships, while interview transcripts were analyzed for themes. Results: Of respondents, 27% indicated prior telehealth use and were more likely to prefer telehealth visits (p = 0.03). Perceptions of telehealth were sorted into themes, including scope of care, convenience, and technology. Telehealth was preferred for discussing test results or mental health. Barriers such as travel time and transportation access favored telehealth. Although more convenient, telehealth was found to be less effective for relationship building. The absence of physical examination during phone visits was a concern. Phone visits were more prevalent due to failure of video-based technology. Conclusions: Despite the potential to address these unique challenges in rural communities, telehealth acceptance is poor. Barriers such as accessibility of technology can be improved through governmental and health systemwide measures. Future work can help develop interventions that counter negative perceptions of telehealth while increasing interest and uptake in rural communities.

Implementing an APRN-Led Integrated Behavioral Health Clinic in a Rural Community

OBJECTIVE

A rural primary care clinic implemented an advance practice providers, including nurse practitioner (APRN)-led integrated behavioral health program to facilitate holistic health care delivery.

METHODS

Implementation was facilitated by Health Resources and Services Administration Grant funding to a state University College of Nursing. The College formed an academic-practice partnership with a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) to implement integrated care in a rural satellite clinic administered by the FQHC. An interdisciplinary team (two family APRNs, a psychiatric APRN, a licensed behavioral health provider, and the Grant Project Director who is a Psychiatric APRN and a licensed Psychologist) provided the integrated care based on the University of Washington's Collaborative Care Model.

RESULTS

This brief report describes the implementation of integrated care during the clinic's first year, services provided, lessons learned, community response, and improvement in anxiety and depressive symptoms for patients who were treated for behavioral health problems. An exemplar illustrates how collaborative care addressed one patient's behavioral health and primary care needs.

CONCLUSIONS

APRN-led collaborative care can expand access to holistic, affordable care in rural areas to improve mental health. Adaptation and flexibility in traditional roles may be necessary and determining post-grant access to funding for services will be necessary for sustainability.

Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review

Background: Telemedicine systems were rapidly implemented in response to COVID-19. However, little is known about their effectiveness, acceptability, and sustainability for safety net populations. This study systematically reviewed primary care telemedicine implementation and effectiveness in safety net settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles on telemedicine implementation from 2013 to 2021. The search was done between June and December 2021. Included articles focused on health care organizations that primarily serve low-income and/or rural populations in the United States. We screened 244 articles from an initial search of 343 articles and extracted and analyzed data from N = 45 articles. Results: Nine (20%) of 45 articles were randomized controlled trials. N = 22 reported findings for at least one marginalized group (i.e., racial/ethnic minority, 65 years+, limited English proficiency). Only n = 19 (42%) included African American/Black patients in demographics descriptions, n = 14 (31%) LatinX/Hispanic patients, n = 4 (9%) Asian patients, n = 4 (9%) patients aged 65+ years, and n = 4 (9%) patients with limited English proficiency. Results show telemedicine can provide high-quality primary care that is more accessible and affordable. Fifteen studies assessed barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation. Common barriers were billing/administrative workflow disruption (n = 9, 20%), broadband access/quality (n = 5, 11%), and patient preference for in-person care (n = 4, 9%). Facilitators included efficiency gains (n = 6, 13%), patient acceptance (n = 3, 7%), and enhanced access (n = 3, 7%). Conclusions: Telemedicine is an acceptable care modality to deliver primary care in safety net settings. Future studies should compare telemedicine and in-person care quality and test strategies to improve telemedicine implementation in safety net settings.

Psychotherapy Disruption Before and After the Transition to Virtual Mental Health Care Induced by the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine population-level disruption in psychotherapy before and after the rapid shift to virtual mental health care induced by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

METHODS

This retrospective study used electronic health record and insurance claims data from three U.S. health systems. The sample included 110,089 patients with mental health conditions who were members of the health systems' affiliated health plans and attended at least two psychotherapy visits from June 14, 2019, through December 15, 2020. Data were subdivided into two 9-month periods (before vs. after COVID-19 onset, defined in this study as March 14, 2020). Psychotherapy visits were measured via health records and categorized as in person or virtual. Disruption was defined as a gap of >45 days between visits.

RESULTS

Visits in the preonset period were almost exclusively in person (97%), whereas over half of visits in the postonset period were virtual (52%). Approximately 35% of psychotherapy visits were followed by a disruption in the preonset period, compared with 18% in the postonset period. Disruption continued to be less common (adjusted OR=0.45) during the postonset period after adjustment for visit, mental health, and sociodemographic factors. The magnitude of the difference in disruption between periods was homogeneous across sociodemographic characteristics but heterogeneous across psychiatric diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found fewer population-level disruptions in psychotherapy receipt after rapid transition to virtual mental health care following COVID-19 onset. These data support the continued availability of virtual psychotherapy.

Measuring Engagement with Mental Health and Behavior Change Interventions: an Integrative Review of Methods and Instruments

BACKGROUND

Engagement is a complex construct consisting of behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions, making engagement a difficult construct to measure. This integrative review aims to (1) present a multidisciplinary overview of measurement methods that are currently used to measure engagement with adult mental health and behavior change interventions, delivered in-person, blended, or digitally, and (2) provide a set of recommendations and considerations for researchers wishing to study engagement.

METHODS

We used an integrative approach and identified original studies and reviews on engagement with mental health or behavior change interventions that were delivered in-person, digitally, or blended.

RESULTS

Forty articles were analyzed in this review. Common methods to assess engagement were through objective usage data, questionnaire-based data, and qualitative data, with objective usage data being used most frequently. Based on the synthesis of engagement measures, we advise researchers to (1) predefine the operationalization of engagement for their specific research context, (2) measure behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions of engagement in all cases, and (3) measure engagement over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature shows a bias towards behavioral measures of engagement in research, as most studies measured engagement exclusively through objective usage data, without including cognitive and affective measures of engagement. We hope that our recommendations will help to reduce this bias and to steer engagement research towards an integrated approach.

Barriers and facilitators of access and utilization of mental health services among forensic service users along the care pathway

BACKGROUND

The verdict of Not Criminally Responsible on account of a Mental Disorder (NCRMD) is increasingly used to access specialized mental health services in Canada and elsewhere. This situation highlights the importance of ensuring timely access to services in the community to prevent violence and justice involvement. The objective of the present study is to identify individual and contextual barriers and facilitators of access to mental health services during the period preceding an offense leading to a verdict of NCRMD.

METHODS

The sample includes 753 people found NCRMD in Québec, Canada. All episodes of mental health hospitalizations and service use before the index offense were identified using provincial administrative health data, for an average period of 4.5 years. Access was conceptualized as a function of the possibility of seeking, reaching and receiving appropriate health care services, based on Lévesque and colleagues patient-centred model of access to care. Generalized linear models were computed to identify the individual and contextual predictors of: (1) seeking mental healthcare (at least one contact with any type of services for mental health reasons); (2) reaching psychiatric care (at least one contact with a psychiatrist); (3) receiving psychiatric care, operationalized as (3a) continuity and (3b) intensity. Factors associated with volume of emergency mental health services were examined as exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

Geographical considerations were highly important in determining who reached, and who received specialized mental health care - above and beyond individual factors related to need. Those who lived outside of major urban centres were 2.6 times as likely to reach psychiatric services as those who lived in major urban centres, and made greater use of emergency mental health services by 2.1 times. Living with family decreased the odds of seeking mental healthcare by half and the intensity of psychiatric care received, even when adjusting for level of need.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support efforts to engage with the family of service users and highlights the importance of providing resources to make family-centred services sustainable for health practitioners. Health policies should also focus on the implementation of outreach programs, such as Forensic Assertive Community Treatment teams as part of prevention initiatives.

Children's unmet need for mental health care within and outside metropolitan areas

BACKGROUND

Rural communities experience a lack of pediatric mental health providers. It is unclear if this leads to greater unmet needs for specialty mental health services among rural children.

METHODS

Data from the 2016-2019 National Survey of Children's Health were used to identify children aged 6-17 years with a mental health condition. Caregiver-reported need and receipt of specialty mental health care for their child (met need, unmet need, or no need) was compared according to residence in a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).

RESULTS

The analysis included 13,021 children (14% living outside MSAs). Unmet need for mental health services was reported for 9% of children, with no difference by rural-urban residence (p = 0.940). Multivariable analysis confirmed this finding and identified urban children as less likely to have no need for mental health services, compared to rural children (relative risk ratio of no need vs. met need: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.95; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Children with mental health conditions living in rural areas (outside MSAs) did not have higher rates of unmet needs for specialty mental health services, but they had lower rates of any caregiver-reported needs for such services. Further work is needed to examine caregivers' demand for pediatric specialty mental health services.

Evaluating policies to improve access to mental health services in rural areas

PURPOSE

The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has gradually implemented policies to increase access to mental health care outside of VA medical centers. Most notably, this included requirements to offer mental health services at VA-administered community-based clinics in 2008 and increased access to VA-paid care in the community beginning in 2014. Our objective was to understand how mental health service use patterns changed for rural VA patients during this time.

METHODS

We developed a longitudinal cohort of all rural patients who used VA services between 2002 and 2019 (N = 3,345,862). We examined individual, health care, and contextual predictors of mental health service use as well as modalities of mental health service use during policy-relevant time periods using descriptive statistics.

FINDINGS

Access to mental health services increased with each policy change. The annual percentage of rural VA patients accessing mental health services increased from 11.4% in the earliest years (2002-2004) to 19.8% in the latest years (2017-2019). The most rapid period of increase followed a requirement for availability of mental health services at VA-administered community clinics. Increasing access to VA-paid care in the community had less effect. By the end of the evaluation, gaps remained in the delivery of care to elderly patients over the age of 75.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural patients use mental health services when they become available. Access was the highest with a combination of changes to both delivery modalities and payment methods. Continued, and perhaps different efforts are required to address a persistent disparity for older patients.

Care managers' experiences in a collaborative care program for the treatment of bipolar disorder and PTSD in underserved communities

OBJECTIVES

To understand care managers' experiences treating primary care patients with bipolar disorder and PTSD in a telepsychiatry collaborative care (TCC) program, as part of a large pragmatic trial.

METHODS

We conducted individual qualitative interviews with 12 care managers to evaluate barriers and facilitators to implementation of a previously completed TCC intervention for patients with bipolar disorder and/or PTSD. We used directed and conventional content analysis and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs to organize care manager experiences.

RESULTS

Participants described clinical and medication management support from telepsychiatrists and satisfaction with the TCC model as facilitators of success for patients with bipolar disorder and PTSD in underserved communities. Participants also described onboarding of primary care providers and clinic leadership as keys to successful team-care and credited satisfaction with providing Behavioral Activation as essential to sustained delivery of the psychotherapy component of TCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants described high satisfaction with TCC for patients with bipolar disorder and PTSD. Challenges included lack of clinic leadership and PCP engagement. Early and ongoing promotion of integrated care and prioritizing telepsychiatry consultation with patients, behavioral health professionals and PCPs, may improve patient care, provide ongoing training and improve workforce satisfaction.