Ketamine as a part of anaesthetic management in a dog with twiddler's syndrome

Pacemaker-twiddler's syndrome in a seven-year-old male domestic shorthaired cat

A seven-year-old male neutered domestic shorthaired cat underwent surgical placement of a permanent epicardial pacemaker following diagnosis of intermittent second and third degree atrioventricular block, which was responsible for 'seizure-like' episodes. Although the pacemaker implant was successful, the cat started experiencing near-syncopal episodes approximately one year after surgery. Ambulatory Holter recording showed periods of loss of capture. Therefore, the pacemaker was interrogated using incremental energy output, which did not evoke any capture, even at the highest possible pulse voltage and duration. Thoracic radiographs showed that the pulse generator had rotated compared to the original radiographic assessment and the lead appeared entangled and shortened, resembling the findings described as 'twiddler syndrome' in humans and dogs, which is characterised by twisting of the lead caused by rotation of the pulse generator around its long axis and subsequent lead migration. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of twiddler syndrome in a cat.

The perioperative management of small animals with previously implanted pacemakers undergoing anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE

There is little information in the veterinary literature about the perioperative management of small animal patients with previously implanted pacemakers undergoing elective or emergency non-cardiac procedures. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature with regard to human patients, with previously implanted pacemakers, undergoing general anaesthesia. Using this and the current information on pacemakers and anaesthesia in dogs and cats, we provide recommendations for small animal patients in this situation.

DATABASES USED

Google Scholar, PubMed and CAB Abstracts using and interlinking and narrowing the search terms: "dog", "cat", "small animals", "anaesthesia", "pacemaker", "perioperative", "transvenous pacing", "temporary pacing". Scientific reports and human and small animal studies from the reference lists of the retrieved papers were reviewed. In addition, related human and veterinary cardiology and anaesthesia textbooks were also included to create a narrative review of the subject.

CONCLUSIONS

The best perioperative care for these animals comes from a multidisciplinary approach involving the anaesthetist, cardiologist, surgeon and intensive care unit team. When such an approach is not feasible, the anaesthetist should be familiar with pacemaker technology and how to avoid perioperative complications such as electromagnetic interference, lead damage and reprogramming of the device. The preanaesthetic assessment should be thorough. Information regarding the indication for pacemaker placement, complications during the procedure, location, type and programming of the pacemaker should be readily available. The anaesthetic management of these veterinary patients aims to preserve cardiovascular function while avoiding hypotension, and backup pacing should be available during the perioperative period. Further prospective studies are needed to describe the best perioperative care in small animals with a previously implanted pacemaker.

Vagus Nerve Stimulator Placement in Dogs: Surgical Implantation Technique, Complications, Long-Term Follow-Up, and Practical Considerations

OBJECTIVE

To describe a modified implantation procedure of a vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) device in dogs and to report short- and long-term complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive, experimental study.

ANIMALS

Healthy, adult Beagle dogs (n = 10).

METHODS

A VNS Therapy(®) System was implanted in the left cervical region of anesthetized dogs. During and within 48 hours after surgery, electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance testing of the system were performed. Dogs were monitored daily and the impedance of the system was determined regularly until VNS devices were surgically removed 3 years after implantation.

RESULTS

The implantation procedure was successful in all dogs without intraoperative complications. ECG monitoring and impedance tests were within normal limits during and within 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative seroma formation was common (70%). One dog developed an irreversible Horner's syndrome leading to removal of the device 5 months after implantation. Another dog developed trauma-induced damage of the lead requiring surgical revision. The device could be safely removed in all dogs; however, electrodes were left in place to avoid nerve damage. At removal, the anchor tether was dislodged in 40% of dogs and the lead was twisted in 50% of dogs.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of a VNS Therapy(®) System is safe and feasible in dogs; however, seroma formation, twisting of the lead, and dislodgement of the anchor tether were common. Practical improvements in the technique include stable device placement, use of a compression bandage, and exercise restriction. Regular evaluation of lead impedance is important, as altered values can indicate serious complications.