Systematic decrease of slow-wave sleep after a guided imagery designed to deepen sleep in low hypnotizable subjects

Systematic Review of Hypnotherapy for Sleep and Sleep Disturbance

Sleep disturbance can negatively affect physical and psychological health. Hypnotherapy may be effective for improving sleep with fewer side effects than other treatments. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively identify studies and evidence regarding hypnotherapy for sleep disturbances. Four databases were searched to identify studies examining the use of hypnotherapy for sleep in adult populations. The search yielded 416 articles, of which 44 were included. Qualitative data analysis revealed that 47.7% of the studies showed positive results regarding the impact of hypnotherapy for sleep, 22.7% showed mixed results, and 29.5% showed no impact. A subset of 11 studies that set sleep disturbance as an inclusion criterion and included suggestions for sleep were examined separately and had more favorable results, such that 54.5% showed positive results, 36.4% showed mixed results, and 9.1% showed no impact results. Hypnotherapy appears to be a promising treatment for sleep disturbance. Future studies should report effect sizes, adverse events, and hypnotizability and include sleep-specific suggestions, standardized measures, and descriptions of hypnotherapy intervention procedures.

Hypnotizability May Relate to Interoceptive Ability to Accurately Perceive Sleep Depth: An Exploratory Study

When individuals score high on hypnotizability, they usually report experiencing an altered state of consciousness, physiological changes, and attentional shifts during hypnotic induction procedures as well. We hypothesize that a better interoception of such internal changes is also relevant for accurate sleep perception. We compared subjects scoring high versus low on hypnotizability to the accuracy of their estimations of Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) time awake, and sleep depth and explored their objective sleep. We sampled seven studies performed in our sleep labs across a midday nap or a night resulting in n = 231 subjects (aged 30.11 (SD = 17.02) years, range 18-82 with 15.2% males). Hypnotizability did not influence the accuracy of the perception of time needed to fall asleep or time spent awake. However, the reported sleep depth correlated significantly with the measured amount of slow-wave sleep in high hypnotizables. This pattern appeared across a nap as well as a whole night's sleep studies. We did not find any significant differences in objective sleep patterns depending on hypnotizability. Probably, high hypnotizables benefit from a better interoceptive ability for their perception of their sleep depth.

No evidence for intra-individual correlations between sleep-mediated declarative memory consolidation and slow-wave sleep

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Memory consolidation benefits from a retention period filled with sleep. Several theoretical accounts assume that slow-wave sleep (SWS) contributes functionally to processes underlying the stabilization of declarative memories during sleep. However, reports on correlations between memory retention and the amount of SWS are mixed and typically rely on between-subject correlations and small sample sizes. Here we tested for the first time whether the amount of SWS during sleep predicts the effect of sleep on memory consolidation on an intra-individual level in a large sample.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-nine healthy participants came to the lab twice and took a 90 min nap in both sessions. Sleep-mediated memory benefits were tested using the paired associates word-learning task in both sessions.

RESULTS

In contrast to the theoretical prediction, intra-individual differences in sleep-mediated memory benefits did not significantly correlate with differences in SWS or SWA between the two naps. Also between subjects, the amount of SWS did not correlate with memory retention across the nap. However, subjective ratings of sleep quality were significantly associated with the amount of SWS.

CONCLUSION

Our results question the notion that the amount of SWS per se is functionally related to processes of memory consolidation during sleep. While our results do not exclude an important role of SWS for memory, they suggest that "more SWS" does not necessarily imply better memory consolidation.

Systematic decrease of slow-wave sleep after a guided imagery designed to deepen sleep in low hypnotizable subjects

Slow-wave sleep is one of the most important restorative components of sleep and central for our health and cognitive functioning. Although the amount of slow-wave sleep depends on sleep drive, age and other factors, also the pre-sleep mental state might influence sleep depth. We had shown that a pre-sleep hypnotic suggestion to sleep more deeply increased slow-wave sleep duration in hypnotizable subjects. In contrast, low-hypnotizable participants decreased sleep depth after this intervention. A possible reason might be an aversion to and active resistance against hypnosis. To overcome this potential opposition, we introduced the procedure as 'guided imagery'. We replaced the hypnotic induction by a breathing relaxation. Importantly, the suggestion 'to sleep more deeply' remained identical. We expected that these changes would make it easier for low-hypnotizable subjects to benefit from the suggestion. In contrast, young healthy low-hypnotizable participants did not show positive effects. Similar to our previous studies, they exhibited a reduced slow-wave sleep duration after the intervention. Additionally, the ratio between slow-wave activity and beta band power decreased. Subjective sleep quality remained unaffected. Our results indicate that suggestions to sleep more deeply result in decreased sleep depth in low-hypnotizable participants regardless of the mental technique (guided imagery versus hypnosis). Thus, the aversion against hypnosis per se cannot explain the detrimental effect of the intervention on slow-wave sleep in low-hypnotizable subjects. The results support the notion that our mental state before sleep can influence subsequent slow-wave sleep. However, the mechanisms of the contradictory decrease in low-hypnotizable subjects remain unknown.

Updated Review of the Acoustic Modulation of Sleep: Current Perspectives and Emerging Concepts

With growing interest in the use of acoustic stimuli in sleep research and acoustic interventions used therapeutically for sleep enhancement, there is a need for an overview of the current lines of research. This paper summarizes the various ways to use acoustic input before sleep or stimulation during sleep. It thereby focuses on the respective methodological requirements, advantages, disadvantages, potentials and difficulties of acoustic sleep modulation. It highlights differences in subjective and objective outcome measures, immediate and whole night effects and short versus long term effects. This recognizes the fact that not all outcome parameters are relevant in every research field. The same applies to conclusions drawn from other outcome dimensions, consideration of mediating factors, levels of stimulation processing and the impact of inter-individual differences. In addition to the deliberate influences of acoustic input on sleep, one paragraph describes adverse environmental acoustic influences. Finally, the possibilities for clinical and basic research-related applications are discussed, and emerging opportunities are presented. This overview is not a systematic review but aims to present the current perspective and hence summarizes the most up-to-date research results and reviews. This is the first review providing a summary of the broad spectrum of possibilities to acoustically influence sleep.