Hypnotizability May Relate to Interoceptive Ability to Accurately Perceive Sleep Depth: An Exploratory Study

When individuals score high on hypnotizability, they usually report experiencing an altered state of consciousness, physiological changes, and attentional shifts during hypnotic induction procedures as well. We hypothesize that a better interoception of such internal changes is also relevant for accurate sleep perception. We compared subjects scoring high versus low on hypnotizability to the accuracy of their estimations of Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) time awake, and sleep depth and explored their objective sleep. We sampled seven studies performed in our sleep labs across a midday nap or a night resulting in n = 231 subjects (aged 30.11 (SD = 17.02) years, range 18-82 with 15.2% males). Hypnotizability did not influence the accuracy of the perception of time needed to fall asleep or time spent awake. However, the reported sleep depth correlated significantly with the measured amount of slow-wave sleep in high hypnotizables. This pattern appeared across a nap as well as a whole night's sleep studies. We did not find any significant differences in objective sleep patterns depending on hypnotizability. Probably, high hypnotizables benefit from a better interoceptive ability for their perception of their sleep depth.

No evidence for intra-individual correlations between sleep-mediated declarative memory consolidation and slow-wave sleep

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Memory consolidation benefits from a retention period filled with sleep. Several theoretical accounts assume that slow-wave sleep (SWS) contributes functionally to processes underlying the stabilization of declarative memories during sleep. However, reports on correlations between memory retention and the amount of SWS are mixed and typically rely on between-subject correlations and small sample sizes. Here we tested for the first time whether the amount of SWS during sleep predicts the effect of sleep on memory consolidation on an intra-individual level in a large sample.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-nine healthy participants came to the lab twice and took a 90 min nap in both sessions. Sleep-mediated memory benefits were tested using the paired associates word-learning task in both sessions.

RESULTS

In contrast to the theoretical prediction, intra-individual differences in sleep-mediated memory benefits did not significantly correlate with differences in SWS or SWA between the two naps. Also between subjects, the amount of SWS did not correlate with memory retention across the nap. However, subjective ratings of sleep quality were significantly associated with the amount of SWS.

CONCLUSION

Our results question the notion that the amount of SWS per se is functionally related to processes of memory consolidation during sleep. While our results do not exclude an important role of SWS for memory, they suggest that "more SWS" does not necessarily imply better memory consolidation.

Systematic decrease of slow-wave sleep after a guided imagery designed to deepen sleep in low hypnotizable subjects

Slow-wave sleep is one of the most important restorative components of sleep and central for our health and cognitive functioning. Although the amount of slow-wave sleep depends on sleep drive, age and other factors, also the pre-sleep mental state might influence sleep depth. We had shown that a pre-sleep hypnotic suggestion to sleep more deeply increased slow-wave sleep duration in hypnotizable subjects. In contrast, low-hypnotizable participants decreased sleep depth after this intervention. A possible reason might be an aversion to and active resistance against hypnosis. To overcome this potential opposition, we introduced the procedure as 'guided imagery'. We replaced the hypnotic induction by a breathing relaxation. Importantly, the suggestion 'to sleep more deeply' remained identical. We expected that these changes would make it easier for low-hypnotizable subjects to benefit from the suggestion. In contrast, young healthy low-hypnotizable participants did not show positive effects. Similar to our previous studies, they exhibited a reduced slow-wave sleep duration after the intervention. Additionally, the ratio between slow-wave activity and beta band power decreased. Subjective sleep quality remained unaffected. Our results indicate that suggestions to sleep more deeply result in decreased sleep depth in low-hypnotizable participants regardless of the mental technique (guided imagery versus hypnosis). Thus, the aversion against hypnosis per se cannot explain the detrimental effect of the intervention on slow-wave sleep in low-hypnotizable subjects. The results support the notion that our mental state before sleep can influence subsequent slow-wave sleep. However, the mechanisms of the contradictory decrease in low-hypnotizable subjects remain unknown.

Hypnotic Suggestions Increase Slow-Wave Parameters but Decrease Slow-Wave Spindle Coupling

PURPOSE

Sleep, in particular slow-wave sleep, is beneficial for memory consolidation. In two recent studies, a hypnotic suggestion to sleep more deeply increased the amount of slow-wave sleep in both a nap and a night design. In spite of these increases in slow-wave sleep, no beneficial effect on declarative memory consolidation was found. As coupling of slow-waves and sleep spindles is assumed to be critical for declarative memory consolidation during sleep, we hypothesized that the missing memory benefit after increased SWS could be related to a decrease in slow-wave/spindle coupling.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Data from 33 highly hypnotizable subjects were retrieved from a nap (n = 14) and a night (n = 19) study with a similar design and procedure. After an adaptation session, subjects slept in the sleep laboratory for two experimental sessions with polysomnography. Prior to sleep, a paired-associate learning task was conducted. Next, subjects either listened to a hypnotic suggestion to sleep more deeply or to a control text in a randomized order according to a within-subject design. After sleep, subjects performed the recall of the memory task. Here, we conducted a fine-grained analysis of the sleep data on slow-waves, spindles and their coupling.

RESULTS

In line with our hypothesis, listening to a hypnosis tape decreased the percentage of spindles coupled to slow-waves. Slow-wave parameters were consistently increased, but sleep spindles remained unaffected by the hypnotic suggestion.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that selectively enhancing slow-waves without affecting sleep spindles might not be sufficient to improve memory consolidation during sleep.

Updated Review of the Acoustic Modulation of Sleep: Current Perspectives and Emerging Concepts

With growing interest in the use of acoustic stimuli in sleep research and acoustic interventions used therapeutically for sleep enhancement, there is a need for an overview of the current lines of research. This paper summarizes the various ways to use acoustic input before sleep or stimulation during sleep. It thereby focuses on the respective methodological requirements, advantages, disadvantages, potentials and difficulties of acoustic sleep modulation. It highlights differences in subjective and objective outcome measures, immediate and whole night effects and short versus long term effects. This recognizes the fact that not all outcome parameters are relevant in every research field. The same applies to conclusions drawn from other outcome dimensions, consideration of mediating factors, levels of stimulation processing and the impact of inter-individual differences. In addition to the deliberate influences of acoustic input on sleep, one paragraph describes adverse environmental acoustic influences. Finally, the possibilities for clinical and basic research-related applications are discussed, and emerging opportunities are presented. This overview is not a systematic review but aims to present the current perspective and hence summarizes the most up-to-date research results and reviews. This is the first review providing a summary of the broad spectrum of possibilities to acoustically influence sleep.

How robust are sleep-mediated memory benefits?

Memories benefit from a retention interval filled with sleep. Current theories assume that this beneficial effect relies on consolidation processes occurring during slow-wave sleep (SWS). However, in the last years, several key findings supporting these theories could not be replicated or occurred only under certain conditions, suggesting that effects of sleep on memory are smaller, more task-dependent, less SWS-related, less robust and less long-lasting than previously assumed. In this review, we summarize recent replication failures, null-findings, meta-analyses and studies reporting important boundary conditions for the effect of sleep on declarative memory. We argue that more attempts to replicate and meta-analytic approaches together with higher standards for reproducible science are critical to advance the field of sleep and memory.

HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIONS GIVEN BEFORE NIGHTTIME SLEEP EXTEND SLOW-WAVE SLEEP AS COMPARED TO A CONTROL TEXT IN HIGHLY HYPNOTIZABLE SUBJECTS

While slow-wave sleep (SWS) is fundamental for maintaining health and well-being, it is typically reduced with stress or age. The authors have previously reported that hypnotic suggestions before sleep increased SWS duration and slow-wave activity (SWA) during a midday nap in hypnotizable younger and older women. To test generalizability, they investigated this effect across 8 hours nighttime sleep in 43 healthy young French-speaking subjects (19 males) of high and low hypnotizability. In accordance with their previous results, listening to hypnotic suggestions before sleep was followed by higher amounts of SWS in highly hypnotizable subjects and higher SWA power compared to a control condition. The effects were most pronounced at the beginning of the night. Further studies are needed to examine whether hypnotic suggestions can deepen sleep also above non-intervention nights. The findings provide a basis for the examination and potential application of hypnosis to improve sleep in clinical populations.

Effects of Relaxing Music on Healthy Sleep

Sleep is vital for human health and wellbeing, and sleep disturbances are comorbid to many mental and physiological disorders. Music consistently improves subjective sleep quality, whereas results for objective sleep parameters diverge. These inconsistencies might be due to inter-individual differences. Here, 27 female subjects listened to either music or a control text before a 90 minutes nap in a within-subjects design. We show that music improved subjective sleep quality as compared to the text condition. In all participants, music resulted in a reduced amount of sleep stage N1 during the nap. In addition, music significantly increased the amount of slow-wave sleep (SWS) and increased the low/high frequency power ratio. However, these effects occurred only in participants with a low suggestibility index. We conclude that listening to music before a nap can improve subjective and objective sleep parameters in some participants.

No Evidence for Memory Decontextualization across One Night of Sleep

Sleep after learning strengthens memory consolidation. According to the active system consolidation hypothesis, sleep supports the integration of newly acquired memories into cortical knowledge networks, presumably accompanied by a process of decontextualization of the memory trace (i.e., a gradual loss of memory for the learning context). However, the availability of contextual information generally facilitates memory recall and studies on the interaction of sleep and context on memory retrieval have revealed inconsistent results. Here, we do not find any evidence for a role of sleep in the decontextualization of newly learned declarative memories. In two separate studies, 104 healthy young adults incidentally learned words associated with a context. After a 12 h retention interval filled with either sleep or wakefulness, recall (Experiment 1) or recognition (Experiment 2) was tested with the same or different context. Overall, memory retrieval was significantly improved when the learning context was reinstated, as compared to a different context. However, this context effect of memory was not modulated by sleep vs. wakefulness. These findings argue against a decontextualization of memories, at least across a single night of sleep.