Identification and functional characterization of a novel F5 mutation (Ala512Val, FVB onn ) associated with activated protein C resistance

A novel factor V compound heterozygous mutation associated with thrombosis (Y1961C; FV-Kanazawa, together with 1982_1983del)

BACKGROUND

Factor (F)V is pivotal in both procoagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms. The present report describes a novel F5 mutation in a FV-deficient patient (FV activity, 6 IU/dL; FV antigen, 32 IU/dL) complicated by recurrent deep vein thrombosis. The patient demonstrated activated protein C resistance (APCR) with compound heterozygous mutations consisting of FV-Y1961C (FVKanazawa) and FV-1982_1983del.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify thrombotic mechanisms associated with this FV abnormality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Levels of FV-1982_1983del were below the detection sensitivity in our expression experiments using human embryonic kidney 293T cells, and analyses were targeted, therefore, on the FV-Y1961C mutation. Activated partial thromboplastin time-based clotting assays demonstrated that FV-Y1961C exhibited APCR and that the reduced activated protein C (APC) susceptibility in FVa-Y1961C resulted in a marked depression of APC-catalyzed inactivation with delayed cleavage at Arg506 and little cleavage at Arg306 with or without protein S. The APC cofactor activity of FV-Y1961C in APC-catalyzed FVIIIa inactivation promoted by Arg336 cleavage in FVIII was impaired. The binding affinity of FVa-Y1961C to phospholipid membranes was reduced in reactions involving APC/protein S-catalyzed inactivation and in prothrombinase activity. Furthermore, the addition of FVa-Y1961C to plasma failed to inhibit tissue factor-induced procoagulant function. These characteristics were similar to those of FV-W1920R (FVNara) and FV-A2086D (FVBesançon).

CONCLUSION

We identified a compound heterozygous FV-Y1961C mutation in the C1 domain representing a novel FV mutation (FVKanazawa) resulting in not only APCR due to impaired FVa susceptibility and FV cofactor activity for APC function but also impaired inhibition of tissue factor-induced procoagulant function. These defects in anticoagulant function associated with FV in FV-Y1961C contributed to a prothrombotic state.

Thrombophilia Screening: Not So Straightforward

Although inherited thrombophilias are lifelong risk factors for a first thrombotic episode, progression to thrombosis is multifactorial and not all individuals with inherited thrombophilia develop thrombosis in their lifetimes. Consequently, indiscriminate screening in patients with idiopathic thrombosis is not recommended, since presence of a thrombophilia does not necessarily predict recurrence or influence management, and testing should be selective. It follows that a decision to undertake laboratory detection of thrombophilia should be aligned with a concerted effort to identify any significant abnormalities, because it will inform patient management. Deficiencies of antithrombin and protein C are rare and usually determined using phenotypic assays assessing biological activities, whereas protein S deficiency (also rare) is commonly detected with antigenic assays for the free form of protein S since available activity assays are considered to lack specificity. In each case, no single phenotypic assay is capable of detecting every deficiency, because the various mutations express different molecular characteristics, rendering thrombophilia screening repertoires employing one assay per potential deficiency, of limited effectiveness. Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is more common than discrete deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S and also often detected initially with phenotypic assays; however, some centres perform only genetic analysis for factor V Leiden, as this is responsible for most cases of hereditary APCR, accepting that acquired APCR and rare F5 mutations conferring APCR will go undetected if only factor V Leiden is evaluated. All phenotypic assays have interferences and limitations, which must be factored into decisions about if, and when, to test, and be given consideration in the laboratory during assay performance and interpretation. This review looks in detail at performance and limitations of routine phenotypic thrombophilia assays.

Factor V variants in bleeding and thrombosis

A state-of-the-art lecture titled "Factor V variants in bleeding and thrombosis" was presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) congress in 2023. Blood coagulation is a finely regulated cascade of enzymatic reactions culminating in thrombin formation and fibrin deposition at the site of injury. Factor V (FV) plays a central role in this process, as its activated form is an essential procoagulant cofactor in prothrombin activation. However, other molecular forms of FV act as anticoagulant cofactors of activated protein C and tissue factor pathway inhibitor α, respectively, thereby contributing to the regulation of coagulation. This dual procoagulant and anticoagulant character makes FV a central regulator of the hemostatic balance, and quantitative and qualitative alterations of FV may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding or venous thrombosis. Here, we review the procoagulant and anticoagulant functions of FV and the manifold mechanisms by which F5 gene mutations may affect the balance between these opposite functions and thereby predispose individuals to bleeding or venous thrombosis. In particular, we discuss our current understanding of the 3 main pathological conditions related to FV, namely FV deficiency, activated protein C resistance, and the overexpression of FV-short, a minor splicing isoform of FV with tissue factor pathway inhibitor α-dependent anticoagulant properties and an emerging role as a key regulator of the initiation of coagulation. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented during the 2023 ISTH Congress.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Activated Protein C Resistance and Factor V Leiden

The factor V Leiden (FVL) polymorphism is known as the most common inherited risk factor for venous thrombosis. In turn, FVL is the leading cause of an activated protein C resistance (APCR) phenotype, in which the addition of exogenous activated protein C to plasma does not result in the expected anticoagulant effect. In the routine laboratory approach to the formal diagnosis of FVL, an initial positive screening plasma-based method for APCR is often performed, and only if needed, this is followed by a confirmatory DNA-based assay for FVL. Multiple methods with accepted sensitivity and specificity for determining an APCR/FVL phenotype are commonly categorized into two separate groups: (1) screening plasma-based assays, including qualitative functional clot-based assays, for APCR, and (2) confirmatory DNA-based molecular assays, entailing several tests and platforms, including polymerase chain reaction-based and non-PCR-based techniques, for FVL. This review will describe the methodological aspects of each laboratory test and prepare suggestions on the indication of APCR and FVL testing and method selection.

Impaired factor V-related anticoagulant mechanisms and deep vein thrombosis associated with A2086D and W1920R mutations

Factor V (FV) plays pivotal roles in both procoagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms. Genetic mutations, FV-W1920R (FVNara) and FV-A2086D (FVBesançon), in the C1 and C2 domains of FV light chain, respectively, seem to be associated with deep vein thrombosis. However, the detailed mechanism(s) through which these mutations are linked to thrombophilia remains to be fully explored. The aim of this study was to clarify thrombotic mechanism(s) in the presence of these FV abnormalities. Full-length wild-type (WT) and mutated FV were prepared using stable, human cell lines (HEK293T) and the piggyBac transposon system. Susceptibility of FVa-A2086D to activated protein C (APC) was reduced, resulting in significant inhibition of APC-catalyzed inactivation with limited cleavage at Arg306 and delayed cleavage at Arg506. Furthermore, APC cofactor activity of FV-A2086D in APC-catalyzed inactivation of FVIIIa through cleavage at Arg336 was impaired. Surface plasmon resonance-based assays demonstrated that FV-A2086D bound to Glu-Gly-Arg-chloromethylketone active site-blocked APC and protein S (P) with similar affinities to that of FV-WT. However, weakened interaction between FVa-A2086D and phospholipid membranes was evident through the prothrombinase assay. Moreover, addition of FVa-A2086D to plasma failed to inhibit tissue factor (TF)-induced thrombin generation and reduce prothrombin times. This inhibitory effect was independent of PC, PS, and antithrombin. The coagulant and anticoagulant characteristics of FV(a)-W1920R were similar to those of FV(a)-A2086D. FV-A2086D presented defects in the APC mechanisms associated with FVa inactivation and FV cofactor activity, similar to FV-W1920R. Moreover, both FV proteins that were mutated in the light chain impaired inhibition of TF-induced coagulation reactions. These defects were consistent with congenital thrombophilia.

Factor V Leiden-independent activated protein C resistance: Communication from the plasma coagulation inhibitors subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee

Activated protein C resistance (APC-R) due to the single-nucleotide polymorphism factor V Leiden (FVL) is the most common cause of hereditary thrombophilia. It is found predominantly in Caucasians and is uncommon or absent in other populations. Although FVL is responsible for >90% of cases of hereditary APC-R, a number of other F5 variants that also confer various degrees of APC-R and thrombotic risk have been described. Acquired APC-R due to increased levels of coagulation factors, reduced levels of inhibitors, or the presence of autoantibodies occurs in a variety of conditions and is an independent risk factor for thrombosis. It is common for thrombophilia screening protocols to restrict assessment for APC-R to demonstrating the presence or absence of FVL. The aim of this Scientific and Standardisation Committee communication is to detail the causes of FVL-independent APC-R to widen the diagnostic net, particularly in situations in which in vitro APC-R is encountered in the absence of FVL. Predilution clotting assays are not FVL specific and are used to detect clinically significant F5 variants conferring APC-R, whereas different forms of acquired APC-R are preferentially detected using the classical activated partial thromboplastin time-based APC-R assay without predilution and/or endogenous thrombin potential APC-R assays. Resource-specific recommendations are given to guide the detection of FVL-independent APC-R.

Evaluation of Activated Protein C Resistance Using Thrombin Generation Test

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) has been identified as a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A mutation at the level of factor (F) V has at first permitted the description of this phenotypic pattern and corresponded to a transition (guanine to adenine) at nucleotide 1691 in the gene coding for factor V, resulting in the replacement of arginine at position 506 by a glutamine. This confers to this mutated FV a resistance toward the proteolytic action of the complex formed by activated protein C with protein S. However, many other factors also lead to APCR, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy, and postpartum. All these conditions lead to the phenotypic expression of APCR and are associated with an increased risk of VTE. Considering the large population affected, the proper detection of this phenotype is a public health challenge. Currently, two types of tests are available: clotting time-based assays and their multiple variants and a thrombin generation-based assays and the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based APCR assay. As APCR was thought to be uniquely related to the FV Leiden mutation, clotting time-based assays were specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Nevertheless, other APCR conditions have been reported but were not captured by these clotting methods. Thus, the ETP-based APCR assay has been proposed as a global coagulation test able to these multiple APCR conditions, as it provides much more information, which makes it a potential candidate for screening coagulopathic conditions before therapeutic interventions. This chapter will describe the current method used for the realization of the ETP-based APC resistance assay.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

Severe thrombophilia in a factor V-deficient patient homozygous for the Ala2086Asp mutation (FV Besançon)

BACKGROUND

Coagulation factor V (FV), present in plasma and platelets, has both pro- and anticoagulant functions.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated an FV-deficient patient (FV:C 3%, FV:Ag 4%) paradoxically presenting with recurrent venous thrombosis (11 events) instead of bleeding.

METHODS/RESULTS

Thrombophilia screening revealed only heterozygosity for the F2 20210G>A mutation. Although thrombin generation in the patient's platelet-poor plasma was suggestive of a hypocoagulable state, thrombin generation in the patient's platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was higher than in control PRP and extremely resistant to activated protein C (APC). This was partially attributable to the complete abolition of the APC-cofactor activity of FV and a marked reduction of plasma tissue factor pathway inhibitor antigen and activity. The patient was homozygous for a novel missense mutation (Ala2086Asp, FVBesançon ) that favors a "closed conformation" of the C2 domain, predicting impaired binding of FV(a) to phospholipids. Recombinant FVBesançon was hardly secreted, indicating that this mutation is responsible for the patient's FV deficiency. Model system experiments performed using highly diluted plasma as a source of FV showed that, compared with normal FVa, FVaBesançon has slightly (≤1.5-fold) unfavorable kinetic parameters (Km , Vmax ) of prothrombin activation, but also a lower rate of APC-catalyzed inactivation in the presence of protein S.

CONCLUSIONS

FVBesançon induces a hypercoagulable state via quantitative (markedly decreased FV level) and qualitative (phospholipid-binding defect) effects that affect anticoagulant pathways (anticoagulant activities of FV, FVa inactivation, tissue factor pathway inhibitor α level) more strongly than the prothrombinase activity of FVa. A possible specific role of platelet FV cannot be excluded.

Partial F8 gene duplication (factor VIII Padua) associated with high factor VIII levels and familial thrombophilia

High coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) levels comprise a common risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the underlying genetic determinants are largely unknown. We investigated the molecular bases of high FVIII levels in 2 Italian families with severe thrombophilia. The proband of the first family had a history of recurrent VTE before age 50 years, with extremely and persistently elevated FVIII antigen and activity levels (>400%) as the only thrombophilic defects. Genetic analysis revealed a 23.4-kb tandem duplication of the proximal portion of the F8 gene (promoter, exon 1, and a large part of intron 1), which cosegregated with high FVIII levels in the family and was absent in 103 normal controls. Targeted screening of 50 unrelated VTE patients with FVIII levels ≥250% identified a second thrombophilic family with the same F8 rearrangement on the same genetic background, suggesting a founder effect. Carriers of the duplication from both families showed a twofold or greater upregulation of F8 messenger RNA, consistent with the presence of open chromatin signatures and enhancer elements within the duplicated region. Testing of these sequences in a luciferase reporter assay pinpointed a 927-bp region of F8 intron 1 associated with >45-fold increased reporter activity in endothelial cells, potentially mediating the F8 transcriptional enhancement observed in carriers of the duplication. In summary, we report the first thrombophilic defect in the F8 gene (designated FVIII Padua) associated with markedly elevated FVIII levels and severe thrombophilia in 2 Italian families.

Surface loops of trypsin-like serine proteases as determinants of function

Trypsin and chymotrypsin-like serine proteases from family S1 (clan PA) constitute the largest protease group in humans and more generally in vertebrates. The prototypes chymotrypsin, trypsin and elastase represent simple digestive proteases in the gut, where they cleave nearly any protein. Multidomain trypsin-like proteases are key players in the tightly controlled blood coagulation and complement systems, as well as related proteases that are secreted from diverse immune cells. Some serine proteases are expressed in nearly all tissues and fluids of the human body, such as the human kallikreins and kallikrein-related peptidases with specialization for often unique substrates and accurate timing of activity. HtrA and membrane-anchored serine proteases fulfill important physiological tasks with emerging roles in cancer. The high diversity of all family members, which share the tandem β-barrel architecture of the chymotrypsin-fold in the catalytic domain, is conferred by the large differences of eight surface loops, surrounding the active site. The length of these loops alters with insertions and deletions, resulting in remarkably different three-dimensional arrangements. In addition, metal binding sites for Na+, Ca2+ and Zn2+ serve as regulatory elements, as do N-glycosylation sites. Depending on the individual tasks of the protease, the surface loops determine substrate specificity, control the turnover and allow regulation of activation, activity and degradation by other proteins, which are often serine proteases themselves. Most intriguingly, in some serine proteases, the surface loops interact as allosteric network, partially tuned by protein co-factors. Knowledge of these subtle and complicated molecular motions may allow nowadays for new and specific pharmaceutical or medical approaches.

Optimisation of antithrombin resistance assay as a practical clinical laboratory test: Development of prothrombin activator using factors Xa/Va and automation of assay

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombin resistance (ATR) is a novel thrombotic risk in abnormal prothrombins. A manual ATR assay using Oxyuranus scutellatus (Ox) venom as a prothrombin activator was established for detecting antithrombin-resistant prothrombin. However, this assay was limited because of Ox snake venom availability and its throughput capacity. Here, we have improved the ATR assay using bovine factors Xa and Va (FXa/Va) as prothrombin activators and have optimised assay conditions for an automated instrument (ACL TOP 500).

METHODS

Diluted plasma was incubated with a prothrombin activator mix (phospholipids, CaCl₂ , and bovine FXa/Va), followed by inactivation with antithrombin for 10, 20 and 30 minutes. We added a chromogenic substrate S-2238, and assessed changes in absorbance/min at 405 nm. We also adapted assay conditions for ACL TOP 500.

RESULTS

Optimum conditions for FXa/Va treatment were 6.25% phospholipids, 5 mM CaCL₂ , 0.01 μg/mL FXa and 0.1 μg/mL FVa. ATR assay kinetics with the FXa/Va activator was comparable with that with the Ox activator in heterozygous reconstituted plasma with the recombinant wild-type or antithrombin-resistant prothrombin. Using ACL TOP 500, optimum conditions for the FXa/Va treatment were 10.0% phospholipids, 5 mM CaCl₂ , 0.02 μg/mL FXa and 0.2 μg/mL FVa. The automated ATR assay with the FXa/Va activator demonstrated good detectability for antithrombin-resistant prothrombin in plasma from a heterozygous carrier with prothrombin Yukuhashi or Belgrade.

CONCLUSION

We optimised the ATR assay with the FXa/Va activator and adapted the assay for ACL TOP 500; the assay showed the ability to clearly detect antithrombin-resistant prothrombin in manual and automated procedures.

Novel insights into the regulation of coagulation by factor V isoforms, tissue factor pathway inhibitorα, and protein S

Factor V (FV) is a regulator of both pro- and anticoagulant pathways. It circulates as a single-chain procofactor, which is activated by thrombin or FXa to FVa that serves as cofactor for FXa in prothrombin activation. The cofactor function of FVa is regulated by activated protein C (APC) and protein S. FV can also function as an anticoagulant APC cofactor in the inhibition of FVIIIa in the membrane-bound tenase complex (FIXa/FVIIIa). In recent years, it has become clear that FV also functions in multiple ways in the tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) anticoagulant pathway. Of particular importance is a FV splice variant (FV-Short) that serves as a carrier and cofactor to TFPIα in the inhibition of FXa. FV-Short is generated through alternative splicing of exon 13 that encodes the large activation B domain. A highly negatively charged binding site for TFPIα is exposed in the C-terminus of the FV-Short B domain, which binds the positively charged C-terminus of TFPIα, thus keeping TFPIα in circulation. The binding of TFPIα to FV-Short is also instrumental in localizing the inhibitor to the surface of negatively charged phospholipids, where TFPIα inhibits FXa in process that is stimulated by protein S. Plasma FV activation intermediates and partially proteolyzed platelet FV similarly bind TFPIα with high affinity and regulate formation of prothrombinase. The novel insights gained into the interaction between FV isoforms, TFPIα, and protein S have opened a new avenue for research about the mechanisms of coagulation regulation and also for future development of therapeutics aimed at modulating coagulation.

Diagnosis and management of factor V Leiden

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of the factor V Leiden (FVL) missense mutation (Arg506Gln) causing factor V resistance to the anticoagulant action of activated protein C was a landmark that allowed a better understanding of the basis of inherited thrombotic risk. FVL mutation is currently the most common known hereditary defect predisposing to venous thrombosis. Areas covered: Novel data-driven FVL diagnosis and therapeutic approaches in the management of FVL carriers in various clinical settings. Brief conclusions on topics of direct clinical relevance including currently available indications for primary and secondary prophylaxis, the management of female, pediatric carriers and asymptomatic relatives. Latest evidence on the association between FVL and cancer, as well as the possible use of direct oral anticoagulant therapy. Expert commentary: Although FVL diagnosis nowadays is highly accurate, many doubts remain regarding the best management and therapeutic protocols. The main role of clinicians is to tailor therapeutic strategies to carriers and their relatives. High familial penetrance, distinctive aspects of the first thrombotic event (provoked/unprovoked, age, etc.) and laboratory biomarkers can guide the optimal management of secondary antithrombotic prophylaxis, primary prophylaxis in asymptomatic individuals, and whether to screen relatives.