Poor comparability of coagulation screening test with specific measurement in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: results from a multicenter/multiplatform study

Utilization of international normalized ratio-derived formula to predict plasma rivaroxaban level-Validation study and real-world experience

INTRODUCTION

Specific assays of plasma rivaroxaban level are not always readily available with short turnaround time, which hamper the management of urgent clinical situations. In this study, we aimed to build a predictive formula of plasma rivaroxaban levels from international normalized ratio (INR) value and validated in real world clinical situations.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients who were taking rivaroxaban participated in the study. Patients were randomized into testing cohort and validation cohorts. The prediction formula was built from the testing cohort and then validated in validation cohort. The predictive performance was further validated on real-world clinical requests.

RESULTS

The root mean square error (RMSE) of the predictive formula for the testing and validation cohorts were 61.81 and 69.32 ng/mL, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for the formula to predict the threshold plasma rivaroxaban level of 75 ng/mL were 95% (95% CI: 85.4%-100%) and 87.5% (95% CI: 71.3%-100%), respectively, in real-world clinical situations.

CONCLUSION

Plasma rivaroxaban level of threshold level of 75 ng/mL can be calculated from prediction formula by INR value with satisfactory accuracy and it can be used to guide the decision for reversal.

The safety of available pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation.

AREAS COVERED

We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.

Pharmacokinetics of single-dose rivaroxaban under fed state in obese vs. non-obese subjects: An open-label controlled clinical trial (RIVOBESE-PK)

The evidence of rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetics in obese compared with non-obese populations remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban between obese and non-obese populations under fed state. Participants who met the study's eligibility criteria were assigned into one of two groups: obese (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) or non-obese (body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). A single dose of rivaroxaban 20 mg was orally administered to each participant. Nine blood samples over 48 h, and multiple urine samples over 18 h were collected and analyzed for rivaroxaban concentration using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass detector. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonlin software. Thirty-six participants were recruited into the study. No significant changes were observed between obese and non-obese participants in peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 48 h or to infinity, elimination rate constant, half-life, apparent volume of distribution, apparent clearance, and fraction of drug excreted unchanged in urine over 18 h. Rivaroxaban's exposure was similar between the obese and non-obese subjects, and there were no significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters between the two groups. These results suggest that dose adjustment for rivaroxaban is probably unwarranted in the obese population.

Clinical Care Pathway and Management of Major Bleeding Associated with Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: A Modified Delphi Consensus from Saudi Arabia and UAE

Background

The nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have become the mainstay anticoagulation therapy for patients requiring oral anticoagulants (OACs) in the Gulf Council Cooperation (GCC) countries. The frequency of NOAC-associated major bleeding is expected to increase in the Emergency Department (ED). Nonetheless, we still lack local guidelines and recommendations for bleeding management in the region. The present Delphi-based consensus aims to establish a standardized and evidence-based clinical care pathway for managing NOAC-associated major bleeding in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Methods

We adopted a three-step modified Delphi method to develop evidence-based recommendations through two voting rounds and an advisory meeting between the two rounds. A panel of 11 experts from the KSA and UAE participated in the consensus development.

Results

Twenty-eight statements reached the consensus level. These statements addressed key aspects of managing major bleeding events associated with NOACs, including the increased use of NOAC in clinical practice, clinical care pathways, and treatment options.

Conclusion

The present Delphi consensus provides evidence-based recommendations and protocols for the management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the region. Patients with major DOAC-induced bleeding should be referred to a well-equipped ED with standardized management protocols. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for establishing the association between NOAC use and major bleeding. Treating physicians should have prompt access to specific reversal agents to optimize patient outcomes. Real-world evidence and national guidelines are needed to aid all stakeholders involved in NOAC-induced bleeding management.

A comparative in vitro study of the anticoagulant effect of branded versus generic rivaroxaban

BACKGROUND

Several generic formulations of rivaroxaban were recently marketed to be used interchangeably with their branded equivalent. However, there have been no previously published studies that directly compared the in vitro anticoagulant effect of branded vs. generic rivaroxaban. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of three raw rivaroxaban materials, obtained from the branded (Xarelto®) and two generic (Rivarolto® and Rivaroxaban Sandoz®) rivaroxaban formulations on an array of coagulation assays.

METHODS

A pool of normal plasma was spiked with several concentrations of the three rivaroxaban (range 50-750 ng/ml). The concentrations were assessed with a rivaroxaban calibrated anti-Xa assay and confirmed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The following assays were performed: Prothrombin time (PT), activated Partial Thromboplastin time (aPTT), Diluted Russell's Viper Venom Test (dRVVT), Thrombin time (TT), Clauss Fibrinogen, Factor VII, VIII and IX assays, and thromboelastography.

RESULTS

The results obtained by the three rivaroxaban at similar concentrations were comparable. Increasing concentrations of the three rivaroxaban showed a strong positive correlation with the PT, aPTT and dRVVT assays (r > 0.95, p < 0.01 for all), and a strong negative correlation with the Factors assays (r < -0.95, p < 0.01 for all). TT and Clauss Fibrinogen were not affected by rivaroxaban. No significant difference was identified in the mean assays' results obtained by the three rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the branded and generic rivaroxaban exert an identical in vitro anticoagulant effect across a wide range of concentrations.

Comparison of the Correlation Between Coagulation Indices and Rivaroxaban Concentrations

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban has predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, monitoring rivaroxaban concentrations should be provided for special patients with hepatic insufficiency, high bleeding risk, and high thrombotic risk.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to correlate chromogenic anti-Xa assay, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thromboelastogram reaction time (TEG R-time), and rivaroxaban concentration measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) (MS-Riva).

METHODS

Peripheral venous blood was collected from recruited patients 30 minutes before and 2 to 4 hours after drug administration. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and chromogenic anti-Xa assay measured rivaroxaban concentration. Different assays were compared by Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with 191 plasma were included in the study. Overall analysis shows that chromogenic anti-Xa assay, PT, APTT, and TEG R-time strongly correlated with MS-Riva (r = 0.986; r = 0.884; r = 0.741; r = 0.739; P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban peak concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-peak) showed a very strong correlation with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (r = 0.977, P < 0.001) and moderate correlation with PT, APTT, and TEG R-time (r = 0.670; r = 0.571; r = 0.481, P < 0.001). Rivaroxaban trough concentration detected by HPLC-MS/MS (MS-trough) correlated strongly with the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (r = 0.884, P < 0.001), weakly with APTT (r = 0.313; P = 0.043), and not significantly with PT and TEG R-time (P = 0.140; P = 0.341).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry/MS is the preferred choice for monitoring peak and tough concentrations, followed by anti-Xa, while PT is only suitable for peak concentrations. This study can help the clinicians to better adjust the medication regimen and reduce the risk of recurrence of thrombosis as well as the risk of bleeding.

Antithrombin III activity is associated with prognosis, infection, and inflammation in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

OBJECTIVE

Patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) are characterized by severe liver function impairment, coagulation disorder, and multiple organ function impairment. The aim of this study was to explore the predictive value of antithrombin Ⅲ activity to the prognosis of HBV-ACLF patients.

METHODS

A total of 186 HBV-ACLF patients were included in the analysis, and the baseline clinical data of patients were recorded to analyze the risk factors affecting the 30-day survival outcome of patients. Bacterial infection, sepsis, and hepatic encephalopathy were observed in ACLF patients. Antithrombin Ⅲ activity and serum cytokine levels were determined.

RESULTS

The antithrombin Ⅲ activity of ACLF patients in the death group was significantly lower than that in the survival group, and antithrombin Ⅲ activity was independent factors affecting the 30-day outcome. The areas under the receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve of antithrombin Ⅲ activity to predict the 30-day mortality of ACLF was 0.799. Survival analysis showed that the mortality of patients with antithrombin Ⅲ activity less than 13% was significantly increased. Patients with bacterial infection and sepsis had lower antithrombin Ⅲ activity than those without infection. Antithrombin Ⅲ activity was positively correlated with platelet count, fibrinogen, interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-13, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-23, IL-27, and IFN-α, but negatively correlated with C-reactive protein, D dimer, total bilirubin, and creatinine levels.

CONCLUSION

As a natural anticoagulant, antithrombin Ⅲ can be regarded as a marker of inflammation and infection in patients with HBV-ACLF, and as a predictor of survival outcome in patients with ACLF.

Pitfalls in Coagulation Testing

Assays in the coagulation laboratory are affected by numerous variables. Variables which have impact on the test result can lead to incorrect results, and potentially to consequences for further diagnostic and therapeutic decisions made by the clinician. The interferences can be separated into three main groups: biological interferences, with an actual impairment of the patient's coagulation system (congenital or acquired); physical interferences, which usually occur in the pre-analytical phase; and chemical interferences, because of the presence of drugs (mainly anticoagulants) in the blood to be tested. This article discusses some of these interferences in seven instructive cases of (near) miss events as an approach to generate more attention to these issues.

Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio Predicts the Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Patients Taking Rivaroxaban

Background: Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are considered to be safe, over or under anticoagulation and increased bleeding or thromboembolic risk are still considered individually. We aimed to investigate whether there is an association between prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT-INR) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio, and the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and major bleeding among AF patients taking rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Methods: This multi-center cohort study in Taiwan included 3192 AF patients taking rivaroxaban and 958 patients taking dabigatran for stroke prevention where data about PT-INR and aPTT were available. Results: For patients treated with rivaroxaban, a higher INR level was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to an INR level < 1.1. The risk of IS/SE was lower for patients having an INR ≥ 1.5 compared to those with an INR < 1.1 (aHR:0.57; [95%CI: 0.37−0.87]; p = 0.01). On-label dosing of rivaroxaban and use of digoxin were independent factors associated with an INR ≥ 1.5 after taking rivaroxaban. For patients taking dabigatran, a higher aPTT ratio was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. The risk of IS/SE was lower for patients having an aPTT ratio of 1.1−1.2 and 1.3−1.4 than those with an aPTT ratio < 1.1. Conclusions: In AF patients, rivaroxaban with an INR ≥ 1.5 was associated with a lower risk of IS/SE. PT-INR or aPTT ratios were not associated with bleeding events for rivaroxaban or dabigatran. INR may help predict the outcome of AF patients who take rivaroxaban.

Plasma apixaban levels in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease-Relationship with renal function and bleeding complications

Introduction: Accumulation of apixaban in plasma is a major concern in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Studies that investigated plasma apixaban level in CKD patients and its association with clinically significant events are scarce. Methods: Patients with CKD Stage 1-4 who were taking apixaban, either 2.5 mg BD or 5 mg BD were recruited. The peak and trough plasma apixaban level were measured after 2 h and 12 h of last dose respectively. The results were correlated with renal function and clinical events during the period of follow-up from 1 January 2018 to 31 October 2021. Results: 141 patients (CKD Stage 1, n = 12; Stage 2, n = 74; Stage 3, n = 48, stage 4, n = 7) were included for analysis. The plasma peak and trough apixaban were significantly higher in patients with CKD stage 3 when compared with those having CKD stage 2 and 1 (peak levels: 223.4 ± 107.8 ng/ml vs. 161.0 ± 55.2 ng/ml vs. 126.6 ± 30.2 ng/ml; trough levels: 118.3 ± 67.9 ng/ml vs. 81.2 ± 33.0 ng/ml vs. 51.9 ± 31.1 ng/ml, p < 0.05 or all) in patients taking 5 mg BD. Plasma trough apixaban level was negatively correlated with eGFR in patients taking 5 mg BD (r ² = -0.174, p < 0.001) and 2.5 mg BD (r ² = -0.215, p < 0.05). The plasma peak and trough apixaban level correlated with PT (r ² = 0.065, p = 0.003 and r ² = 0.096, p < 0.01 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that plasma trough apixaban levels were associated with the risk of bleeding complications (Odd ratio: 1.011, 95% CI:1.002-1.021, p = 0.023). Conclusion: The plasma apixaban level shows a trend of increase with worsening renal function, and an increase in the plasma apixaban level is suggestive of an increased risk of bleeding complications in patients with CKD. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to evaluate relationship between plasma apixaban level and renal function as well as safety outcome in CKD patients. Moreover, the role of drug level monitoring should be prospectively evaluated for dosage optimization and the minimization of bleeding risks in CKD patients.

Thrombodynamics Test in Assessing the Risk of Thrombus Formation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Aim. To evaluate thrombus characteristics in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) using Thrombodynamics test.Materials and methods. Thrombodynamics test was performed in 100 patients with paroxysmal and permanent forms of AF taking different DOACs, dose choice was done in accordance with the instructions for drugs use. For analysis samples of fresh citrated platelet-free plasma were taken just before regular DOACs dose intake (trough concentration). Statistical data processing was carried out using R software packages.Results. All patients had no history of thrombosis or bleeding before inclusion in this study. All parameters of Thrombodynamics test taken at residual concentration of DOACs were in general within reference values, that is in the area of normal coagulation: spatial clot growth rate (V) – 26.56 (25.0; 29.2) μm/min, the time to the start of clot growth (Tlag) – 1.05 (0.85; 1.27) min, initial spatial clot growth rate (Vi) – 44.3±7.7 μm/min, stationary spatial clot growth rate (Vst) – 26.5 (24.9; 28.4) μm/min, clot size (CS) – 999.7 (912.9; 1084.7) μm, clot density (D) – 22883.1±3199.9 arb. units. D was appeared to be higher in women [22947.7 (21477.5; 22947.7) vs men [22124.8 (19722.8; 22124.8), p=0.035] and Tlag was significantly higher in patients with chronic heart failure [1.2 (1.0; 1.2) vs 1.0 (0.8; 1.0), p=0.008]. A correlation was found between level of creatinine and Tlag parameter, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and clot density. With an increase in the level of creatinine in the blood and a decrease in GFR, respectively, there was an increase in Tlag parameter (p-value 0.038); with an increase in GFR, clot density decrease (p-value 0.005).

Conclusion. All parameters of Thrombodynamics test on residual concentration of DOACs were within reference values that indicated optimal anticoagulant effect of all DOACs. The obtained data of normal coagulation at the residual concentration of the anticoagulant are consistent with the previously obtained data on the safety and effectiveness of DOACs using other methods. Further studies with clinical end points are needed to assess the clinical value of this method.

The myths behind DOAC measurement: Analyses of prescribing information from different regulatory bodies and a call for harmonization

For more than a decade, US laboratories have failed to implement solutions to help their clinicians in managing complex situations or patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The problem may find different origins, among which is the position of the Food and Drug Administration, which categorized these drugs as monitoring- and measurement-free, whereas other regulatory bodies like the European Medicines Agency or the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia were more conservative on the principle that the absence of proof (of monitoring/measurement benefits) is not proof of an absence (of monitoring/measurement needs). Pivotal clinical studies that led to the approval of DOACs were presented as devoid of such testing, although some companies considered monitoring as a solution to improve their benefit/risk ratio. In this JTH In Clinics issue, we report more than a decade of development that has permitted the activation of smart laboratory solutions to qualify or quantify DOACs and discuss myths and misconceptions around technical and regulatory requirements that support the current reluctance of implementing these technologies in most US laboratories. Use of DOACs is ever expanding, with DOAC prescriptions now exceeding those of other anticoagulants, including vitamin K antagonists, in some geographies. As this use increases, the likely need to measure DOAC exposure will also increase. Measurement of DOACs does not represent any technical difficulty. That these laboratory tests are not available in some locations suggests disparities in patient care, and we suggest it is time to address such inequalities.

Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban-treated patients and healthy controls

Introduction

The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and the prothrombin time (PT) are widely available coagulation parameters which are however poor predictors of the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some coagulometers use the clot waveform analysis (CWA) to assess the clotting time but mainly based on a unique parameter. The improvement of these methodologies and the evaluation of the other waveform parameters may increase the sensitivity to DOACs.

Objectives

To assess the performance of an improved clot waveform an method (i.e. FibWave) to detect the impact of edoxaban on the coagulation and the fibrinolytic systems.

Methods

Seventy-one samples from patients treated with edoxaban collected at minimum concentration (CTROUGH) and/or maximum concentration (CMAX), and 45 control samples were included. The aPTT- and PT-based CWA as well as the FibIn, FibEx, and FibLysis methodologies of the FibWave were implemented and performed on an ACL-TOP 700.

Results

PT and FibEx clotting time were strongly correlated to edoxaban concentration (Pearson r = 0.80 and 0.89, respectively). The FibEx clotting time allowed a better discrimination for samples with 30 and 50 ng/ml of edoxaban compared to PT (cutoffs of 96.5 and 114.2 s for the FibEx versus a unique cutoff of 13.1 s for the PT). The fibrinolytic process was impaired in the presence of edoxaban in a dose-dependent manner.

Conclusion

FibEx is more sensitive than aPTT- and PT-based CWA for the detection of the clinically relevant anticoagulant level of edoxaban.

Current and emerging drug strategies for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses. Therefore, medical inpatients require a careful VTE and bleeding risk assessment to drive optimal strategies for VTE prevention. Low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux have long been used for inhospital prophylaxis for patients at increased risk of VTE. The selection of patients who require post-discharge prophylaxis, and the role of direct oral anticoagulants remain debated. New molecules currently under development may contribute to improve the risk benefit of VTE prevention in this setting.

AREAS COVERED

This text summarizes the evidence on approved treatments and on other drugs for the prevention of VTE in acutely ill medical patients. The main focus is on their pharmacological proprieties, clinical efficacy and safety, and the current license approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency), giving the readers a way to compare available drugs to date. The trials presented consider both inhospital and extended prophylaxis.

EXPERT OPINION

Thanks to the potentially favorable safety profile, factor XI inhibitors may play a role in the prevention of VTE in this setting. The expert opinion section discusses pharmacological properties, prophylaxis trials, and potential clinical applications of this novel class of drugs.

[Principles of the perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulants]

Within the approved indications direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly gaining acceptance instead of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). In the last 12 months 5 guidelines relevant to the perioperative management of DOACs have been updated. This article summarizes the current recommendations for the perioperative management of treatment with DOACs. The available substances and their pharmacological properties as well as the possibilities for specific laboratory diagnostics of the effect of DOAC are explained. Special focus is placed on anesthesiologically important aspects of substance-specific preoperative and postoperative intermission intervals, the procedure for neuraxial regional anesthesia and antagonization with specific antidotes in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

Gerinnungsdiagnostik im klinischen Alltag – Teil 2

Während bei einer Vitamin-K-Antagonisten-Therapie die Therapieüberwachung (International Normalized Ratio [INR]) obligat ist, gilt dies für direkte orale Antikoagulanzien (DOAK) oder niedermolekulares Heparin (NMH) nur in ausgewählten klinischen Szenarien. Bei DOAK steht die Bestimmung von Tal- und Spitzenspiegeln des Medikaments im Plasma im Vordergrund, bei NMH die Anti-Xa-Aktivität. Der Zeitpunkt der Probenabnahme in Relation zur Einnahme ist für die Bewertung essenziell. Eine neu aufgetretene Thrombozytopenie im Rahmen stationärer Behandlungen ist häufig. Einordnung der Grunderkrankung, Tag des Auftretens sowie Erfassung medikamentöser Einflüsse und ihrer Dynamik ermöglichen oft die Eingrenzung der Ursache. Die Thrombophilietestung nach venöser Thromboembolie wird aufgrund fehlender therapeutischer Konsequenz zunehmend seltener durchgeführt. Ein Antiphospholipidsyndrom darf aber nicht übersehen werden, da sowohl die Therapiedauer als auch die Wahl des Antikoagulans davon abhängen.

Reversing direct factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors: Factor V addition to prothrombin complex concentrate is beneficial in vitro

Background

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is a human plasma‐derived mixture of partially purified vitamin K‐dependent coagulation factors (VKCF). Current therapeutic indication is treatment and perioperative prophylaxis of bleeding in acquired VKCF deficiency. Off‐label uses include treatment of direct factor Xa‐ or thrombin inhibitor‐associated bleeds, treatment of trauma‐induced coagulopathy, and hemorrhagic complications in patients with liver disease.

Objective

Considering PCC as a general prohemostatic drug, we argued that its clinical efficacy can benefit from supplementation with coagulation factors that are absent in the current PCC formulation. In this study, we focused on factor V.

Methods

We mimicked a coagulopathy in vitro by spiking whole blood or derived plasma with the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) rivaroxaban or dabigatran. We studied DOAC reversal by PCC and factor V concentrate (FVC) using a thrombin generation assay, thromboelastography, fibrin generation clot lysis test, and microfluidic thrombus formation under flow.

Results

In DOAC‐treated plasma, PCC increased the amount of thrombin generated. The addition of FVC alone or in combination with PCC caused a partial correction of the thrombin generation lag time and clotting time. In DOAC‐treated whole blood, the combination of PCC and FVC synergistically improved clotting time under static conditions, whereas complete correction of fibrin formation was observed under flow. Clot strength and clot resistance toward tissue plasminogen activator‐induced lysis were both increased with PCC and further enhanced by additional FVC.

Conclusion

Our in vitro study demonstrates a beneficial effect of the combined use of PCC and FVC in DOAC reversal.

Dabigatran Acylglucuronide, the Major Metabolite of Dabigatran, Shows a Weaker Anticoagulant Effect than Dabigatran

Dabigatran (DAB) is an orally administered thrombin inhibitor. Both DAB and its main metabolite dabigatran acylglucuronide (DABG) have established anticoagulant effects. Here, we aimed to compare the relative anticoagulant effects of DABG and DAB in humans. Anticoagulant effects of DAB and DABG were measured in vitro using a thrombin generation assay. Additionally, their effects on other coagulation assays including PT, aPTT, TT, and fibrinogen were compared. Both DAB and DABG showed inhibitory effects on thrombin generation in a dose-dependent manner, but DABG exhibited a weaker inhibitory effect than that of DAB. The IC₅₀ values of DAB and DABG on thrombin generation AUC were 134.1 ng/mL and 281.9 ng/mL, respectively. DABG also exhibited weaker anticoagulant effects than DAB on PT, aPTT, and TT. The results of the present study indicate that the anticoagulant effect of DABG, a main active DAB metabolite, is weaker than that of DAB.

Managing patients on direct factor Xa inhibitors with rapid thrombelastography

The use of direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban (XABANs) has rapidly increased; however, there is no validated test available to monitor the effect on hemostasis. This study aims to assess how hemostatic management based on the Rapid Thromboelastography (R-TEG) variable activated clotting time (ACT) of XABAN patients with ongoing bleedings or in need for acute surgical intervention, affected patient outcome. A total of 343 XABAN patients were included in the main analysis together with 50 healthy volunteers to validate the reference value for ACT. An ACT >120 s (s) was defined as having XABAN-induced coagulopathy. Sixty-five percent of the XABAN patients presented with R-TEG ACT within the normal reference. Patients with XABAN-induced coagulopathy had a significantly increased risk of severe bleeding. Significantly more patients with extra-cerebral bleeding (ECB) and ACT above 120 s were transfused with five red blood cell (RBC) units or more compared to patients with ACT at 120 s or below (17% vs. 3%, p <.05). Significantly more XABAN-patients with ACT above 120 s received pro-hemostatic intervention with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) when compared to those with ACT at 120 s or below (ECB: 2% vs. 8%, p =.03, intracranial hemorrhage: 25% vs. 68%, p <.00). Patients who received PCC had a higher 30- and 90-day mortality compared to the rest of the cohort (16% vs. 6%, p = .02 and 21% vs. 7%, p =.00). Patients with XABAN-induced coagulopathy as evaluated by R-TEG ACT presented with more severe bleeding and higher transfusion requirements when compared to those with ACT in the normal range. This suggests that R-TEG ACT measurement in XABAN patients with active hemorrhage or in need for acute surgery may be of clinical value.

A retrospective study of indications and consequences of monitoring direct oral anticoagulant plasma concentrations on patient care in a university hospital: The Retro-AOD study

INTRODUCTION

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is increasing. Specific concentrations are available and have been proven to be reliable and reproducible in optimising patient care. This retrospective, monocentric study aimed to describe the indications and consequences of monitoring DOAC plasma levels on patient care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected data of patients hospitalised at the Bordeaux University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. These included demographics, indications, type, dose of DOAC, standard coagulation tests, creatinine clearance and DOAC plasma concentration using specifically calibrated rivaroxaban and apixaban anti-Xa and dabigatran anti-IIa assays. The date of last DOAC intake, the time between intake and plasma level measurement were also collected and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 2197 DOAC assays in 1488 patients were obtained in various clinical situations: urgent or elective procedures, context of acute renal failure, suspicion or occurrence of ischemic strokes, intra-cranial and other bleeding sites. Interpretation of these assays led physicians to maintain, postpone or cancel invasive and high haemorrhagic risk procedures in 757, 261 and 56 cases respectively. The remaining 1123 assays were associated with no significant modification of patient care. DOAC plasma concentration was ≤30 ng ml^-1 (sensitivity 85.4%, specificity 73.6%, positive predictive value 71.1%, negative predictive value 86.7%, AUC 0.81) after a last intake of at least 2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is, to date, the largest report of real-life measurement of specific DOAC plasma level at a single institution. Patient care was not modified in more than half of the assays.

Plasma levels do not predict thrombin generation in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

The antithrombotic effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in specific clinical scenarios is difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of DOAC on thrombin generation (TG) in relation to their plasma level.

METHODS

Eighty patients newly started on anticoagulation were included, 20 patients for each DOAC-apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Plasma was sampled before DOAC (baseline), at plasma peak time, 6 and 12 hours after starting DOAC for quantification of drug levels and TG.

RESULTS

The baseline TG before DOAC intake showed inter-individual variability. All DOACs significantly prolonged lag time (LT) and time to peak (TTP), but did not change endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). Anti-Xa inhibitors but not dabigatran reduced thrombin peak, but the effect of apixaban at plasma peak was less pronounced (factor 1.6). LT and TTP prolongation of dabigatran was lower compared to anti-Xa inhibitors. All DOACs showed a nonlinear dose-response relationship, with the greatest antithrombotic effect at lower DOAC plasma levels. The inhibition of TG parameters between baseline and peak was parallel between individual patients but the coefficient of variation of TG was lower compared to drug levels.

CONCLUSION

The antithrombotic effect at DOAC peak plasma level measured by TG depends on the patient-specific baseline TG level and the drug-specific inhibition by the particular DOAC. Although peak plasma levels have a high variability, the variation of TG is lower compared to drug levels. Therefore, TG assays may be superior to plasma levels in the assessment of the intensity of anticoagulation.

Evaluation of the effect of apixaban using a viscoelastic coagulation assay with Russell's viper venom reagent

Background

Conventional coagulation tests, such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time, are not sensitive to anticoagulation by apixaban. We evaluated the antithrombotic effect of apixaban using a Russell viper venom (RVV) test for a patient who underwent posterior spine fusion surgery.

Case presentation

An 84-year-old man was scheduled for percutaneous posterior spine fusion. He continued apixaban until the night before surgery and resumed it on the first day after surgery. We performed an RVV test as point-of-care coagulation monitoring in combination with chromogenic anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) activity, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Clotting time with the RVV test was prolonged according to the anti-Xa activity of apixaban, which was in the therapeutic range during surgery.

Conclusions

An RVV test might be useful as a point-of-care assay for estimation of the anti-Xa level induced by apixaban during the perioperative period.

2021 Update of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology Recommendations for Laboratory Measurement of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

In 2018, the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) published a consensus document providing guidance for laboratories on measuring direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Since that publication, several significant changes related to DOACs have occurred, including the approval of a new DOAC by the Food and Drug Administration, betrixaban, and a specific DOAC reversal agent intended for use when the reversal of anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban is needed due to life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding, andexanet alfa. In addition, this ICSH Working Party recognized areas where additional information was warranted, including patient population considerations and updates in point-of-care testing. The information in this manuscript supplements our previous ICSH DOAC laboratory guidance document. The recommendations provided are based on (1) information from peer-reviewed publications about laboratory measurement of DOACs, (2) contributing author's personal experience/expert opinion and (3) good laboratory practice.

How do you manage ANTICOagulant therapy in neurosurgery? The ANTICO survey of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINCH)

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant assumption is a concern in neurosurgical patient that implies a delicate balance between the risk of thromboembolism versus the risk of peri- and postoperative hemorrhage.

METHODS

We performed a survey among 129 different neurosurgical departments in Italy to evaluate practice patterns regarding the management of neurosurgical patients taking anticoagulant drugs. Furthermore, we reviewed the available literature, with the aim of providing a comprehensive but practical summary of current recommendations.

RESULTS

Our survey revealed that there is a lack of knowledge, mostly regarding the indication and the strategies of anticoagulant reversal in neurosurgical clinical practice. This may be due a lack of national and international guidelines for the care of anticoagulated neurosurgical patients, along with the fact that coagulation and hemostasis are not simple topics for a neurosurgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

To overcome this issue, establishment of hospital-wide policy concerning management of anticoagulated patients and developed in an interdisciplinary manner are strongly recommended.

Apixaban Does Not Interfere With Protein S or Activated Protein C Resistance (Factor V Leiden) Testing Using aPTT-Based Methods

CONTEXT.—

Apixaban causes a false increase in activated protein C resistance (APCR) ratios and possibly protein S activity.

OBJECTIVE.—

To investigate whether this increase can mask a diagnosis of factor V Leiden (FVL) or protein S deficiency in an actual population of patients undergoing apixaban treatment and hypercoagulation testing.

DESIGN.—

During a 4.5-year period involving 58 patients, we compared the following 4 groups: heterozygous for FVL (FVL-HET)/taking apixaban, wild-type/taking apixaban, heterozygous for FVL/no apixaban, and normal APCR/no apixaban. Patients taking apixaban were also tested for protein S functional activity and free antigen (n = 40).

RESULTS.—

FVL-HET patients taking apixaban had lower APCR ratios than wild-type patients (P < .001). Activated protein C resistance in FVL-HET patients taking apixaban fell more than 3 SD below the cutoff of 2.2 at which the laboratory reflexes FVL DNA testing. No cases of FVL were missed despite apixaban. In contrast to rivaroxaban, apixaban did not interfere with the assessment of protein S activity (mean activity 93.9 IU/dL, free antigen 93.1 IU/dL, P = .39). A total of 3 of 40 patients (8%) had low free protein S antigen (30, 55, and 57 IU/dL), with correspondingly similar activity results (27, 59, and 52 IU/dL, respectively). Apixaban did not cause a missed diagnosis of protein S deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Despite apixaban treatment, APCR testing can distinguish FVL-HET from healthy patients, rendering indiscriminate FVL DNA testing of all patients on apixaban unnecessary. Apixaban did not affect protein S activity.

Different Coagulation Indicators in Predicting Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There are many anticoagulant test indexes available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but how to select the appropriate index and the index cutoff values are still controversial. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess the association of different coagulation indicators with clinical outcomes among DOACs using a meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

A medical literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2020. Studies that reported relationships between coagulation indexes and clinical outcomes or the diagnostic value of coagulation assays were included in the analysis.

FINDINGS

A total of 17 articles (7 meta-analyses and 10 systematic reviews) from 8904 citations were included in the analysis. In the analysis of bleeding events with coagulation indexes for DOACs, for peak prothrombin time level (cutoff value of 19-25 s), the pooled results found a sensitivity of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.44-0.75) and a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-0.86). For rivaroxaban, the trough anti-factor Xa concentration (AXA-C) (cutoff value of 400-500 ng/mL) had a sensitivity of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.16-0.87) and a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 7 (95% CI, 2-32). For apixaban, trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.60-0.96) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.52-0.95). The AUC of the AXA-C peak was higher than that of the trough AXA-C for apixaban, with a higher sensitivity and specificity. Compared with trough concentration of anti-factor IIa for dabigatran, the peak concentration had a higher specificity (98%) at the cutoff value of 484 ng/mL. In the analysis of thromboembolic events with coagulation indexes for DOACs, peak and trough prothrombin time values were not typically correlated with subsequent symptomatic venous thromboembolism, without a sensitivity or specificity higher than 90%. Trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 100% and but a low specificity (<50%) for rivaroxaban-apixaban. Trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 32% with a cutoff value of 108 ng/mL for dabigatran.

IMPLICATION

Peak prothrombin time (19-25 s) and AXA-C had a better predictive value on bleeding outcomes for rivaroxaban and apixaban, whereas peak concentration of anti-factor IIa activity can be an indicator for dabigatran. Coagulation indexes might not be a good indicator of thromboembolic events of DOACs. Because the limited studies focused on association of coagulation indicators and clinical outcomes, more studies are needed to verify this in the future.

Analytical verification and comparison of chromogenic assays for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban determination on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers

Introduction

The aim of the study was to perform analytical verification and comparison of chromogenic assays for determination of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban concentration on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers.

Materials and methods

Precision, linearity, measurement uncertainty estimation and determination of limit of blank, limit of determination and limit of quantification were calculated. Analytical performance specifications were set according to manufacturer specifications and literature data on between laboratory variability. Comparison of the methods was done using Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok regression analysis.

Results

Obtained results have shown acceptable precision on STA Compact Max only for dabigatran (CV = 3.5%) at lower concentration level comparing to manufacturer declaration (CV = 3.6%). On BCSXP, the highest coefficient of variation has been shown for apixaban (6.1%) at lower concentration level. Within laboratory precision was not met on STA Compact Max for all assays. Bland-Altman analysis has shown statistically significant bias for dabigatran (23.2%, 95%CI 11.2 - 35.3; P < 0.001) and apixaban (8.4%, 95%CI 1.2 - 15.6; P = 0.023). Passing-Bablok regression analysis has shown systematic and proportional deviation between methods for rivaroxaban (y = 6.52 (2.94 to 11.83) + 0.84 (0.80 to 0.89) x.

Conclusion

Chromogenic assays for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers are shown as methods with satisfactory long-term analytical performance specifications for determination of direct oral anticoagulants in clinical laboratories. However, we cannot recommend interchangeable use because of the significant bias between assays.

DOAC plasma levels measured by chromogenic anti-Xa assays and HPLC-UV in apixaban- and rivaroxaban-treated patients from the START-Register

INTRODUCTION

To measure direct factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) concentrations, dedicated chromogenic anti-Xa assays are recommended as suitable methods to provide rapid drug quantification. Moreover, the high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) is reported as a reliable quantitative technique. We investigated seven anti-Xa assays and an HPLC-UV method for measurement of apixaban and rivaroxaban levels in patients enrolled in the START-Register.

METHODS

A total of 127 apixaban and 124 rivaroxaban samples were tested by HPLC-UV and the following anti-Xa assays: Biophen DiXaI and Heparin LRT (Hyphen BioMed), Berichrom and Innovance Heparin (Siemens), STA-Liquid Anti-Xa (Stago Diagnostics), Technochrom anti-Xa (Technoclone), and HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa (Werfen). Each method was performed in one of the participating laboratories: Bologna, Cremona, Florence, and Padua.

RESULTS

Our data confirmed the overestimation of apixaban and rivaroxaban levels by the antithrombin-supplemented anti-Xa method (Berichrom). Performances and reproducibility of the six anti-Xa assays not supplemented with antithrombin and the HPLC-UV method were good, with limits of quantification from 8-39 ng/mL (apixaban) and 15-33 ng/mL (rivaroxaban). The six chromogenic methods showed good concordances with the quantitative HPLC-UV [bias: -26.9-22.3 ng/mL (apixaban), -11.3-18.7 ng/mL (rivaroxaban)]. Higher bias and wider range between limits of agreement were observed at higher concentrations [<100 ng/mL: bias -21.3-4.1 ng/mL (apixaban) and -6.2-3.8 ng/mL (rivaroxaban); >200 ng/mL: bias -42.2-36.8 ng/mL (apixaban) and -20.1-68.9 ng/mL (rivaroxaban)].

CONCLUSION

Overall, the anti-Xa assays not supplemented with antithrombin and the HPLC-UV method proved to be suitable for apixaban and rivaroxaban quantification.

Correlation of Thromboelastography with Apparent Rivaroxaban Concentration: Has Point-of-Care Testing Improved?

BACKGROUND

Concern remains over reliable point-of-care testing to guide reversal of rivaroxaban, a commonly used factor Xa inhibitor, in high-acuity settings. Thromboelastography (TEG), a point-of-care viscoelastic assay, may have the ability to detect the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban. The authors ascertained the association of apparent rivaroxaban concentration with thromboelastography reaction time, i.e., time elapsed from blood sample placement in analyzer until beginning of clot formation, as measured using TEG and TEG6S instruments (Haemonetics Corporation, USA), hypothesizing that reaction time would correlate to degree of functional factor Xa impairment.

METHODS

The authors prospectively performed a diagnostic accuracy study comparing coagulation assays to apparent (i.e., indirectly assessed) rivaroxaban concentration in trauma patients with and without preinjury rivaroxaban presenting to a single center between April 2016 and July 2018. Blood samples at admission and after reversal or 24 h postadmission underwent TEG, TEG6S, thrombin generation assay, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay, prothrombin time (PT), and ecarin chromogenic assay testing. The authors determined correlation of kaolin TEG, TEG6S, and prothrombin time to apparent rivaroxaban concentration. Receiver operating characteristic curve compared capacity to distinguish therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration (i.e., greater than or equal to 50 ng/ml) from nontherapeutic concentrations.

RESULTS

Eighty rivaroxaban patients were compared to 20 controls. Significant strong correlations existed between rivaroxaban concentration and TEG reaction time (ρ = 0.67; P < 0.001), TEG6S reaction time (ρ = 0.68; P < 0.001), and prothrombin time (ρ = 0.73; P < 0.001), however reaction time remained within the defined normal range for the assay. Rivaroxaban concentration demonstrated strong but not significant association with coagulation assays postreversal (n = 9; TEG reaction time ρ = 0.62; P = 0.101; TEG6S reaction time ρ = 0.57; P = 0.112) and small nonsignificant association for controls (TEG reaction time: ρ = -0.04; P = 0.845; TEG6S reaction time: ρ = -0.09; P = 0.667; PT-neoplastine: ρ = 0.19; P = 0.301). Rivaroxaban concentration (area under the curve, 0.91) and TEG6S reaction time (area under the curve, 0.84) best predicted therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration and exhibited similar receiver operating characteristic curves (P = 0.180).

CONCLUSIONS

Although TEG6S demonstrates significant strong correlation with rivaroxaban concentration, values within normal range limit clinical utility rendering rivaroxaban concentration the gold standard in measuring anticoagulant effect.

Impact of rivaroxaban plasma concentration on perioperative red blood cell loss

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the impact of preoperative calculated rivaroxaban (RXA) plasma concentration on perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, we identified patients with RXA intake according to a preoperative determination of RXA levels within 96 hours before surgery. RXA plasma concentration at the beginning of surgery was then calculated from the last RXA intake using a single-compartment pharmacokinetic model with four categories of RXA concentration (≤20, 21-50, 51-100, and >100 μg/L). Patients were classified into surgery with high (≥500 mL) or low (<500 mL) expected blood loss. Perioperative bleeding was determined by calculating RBC loss.

RESULTS

We analyzed 308 surgical interventions in 298 patients during the period from January 2012 to July 2018. Among patients undergoing surgery with low expected blood loss, RBC loss varied from 164 mL (standard deviation [SD], 189) to 302 mL (SD, 397) (p = 0.66), and no association of calculated RXA concentration with RBC loss was observed. In patients undergoing surgery with high expected blood loss, we found a significant correlation of calculated RXA concentration with RBC loss (Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.29; p = 0.002). RBC loss increased with rising RXA concentration from 575 mL (SD, 365) at RXA concentration of 20 μg/L or less up to 1400 mL (SD, 1300) at RXA concentration greater than 100 μg/L. RXA concentration greater than 100 μg/L was associated with a significant increase of in RBC loss of 840 mL (95% confidence interval, 360-1300; p < 0.001). Transfusion of RBC and fresh frozen plasma units tended to increase in patients with RXA concentrations greater than 100 μg/L. The proportion of patients treated with prothrombin complex concentrate and coagulation factor XIII concentrate increased significantly with higher RXA concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Only in surgery with high expected blood loss, a calculated RXA concentration of greater than 100 μg/L was associated with a significant increase of perioperative RBC loss.

International Normalized Ratio as a Screening Test for Assessment of Anticoagulant Activity for Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban or Apixaban: A Pilot Study

Introduction: In patients treated with direct oral anti activated factor X (anti-FXa) anticoagulants such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, there are several emergency and non-emergency conditions in which anticoagulation activity should be measured. The validity of the common global clotting tests, prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT/INR) for determination of blood levels of these drugs, has been widely investigated. As the anticoagulation activity evaluation “calibrated anti-FXa” of these drugs is relatively more expensive and less available, we aimed to build a prediction model for anticoagulation activity assessment based on INR values.

Methods and Findings: One hundred sixty samples from 80 hospitalized patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban were tested using PT/INR and Anti-FXa chromogenic assay. Two blood samples, trough and peak, were collected from each subject. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups. One group (n = 40) was used to build the model, which was validated by the second group (n = 40). There was a strong correlation between anti-FXa concentrations and INR in rivaroxaban treated patients (r = 0.899, p < 0.001). Therefore, we were able to build a formula for rivaroxaban patient group which reliably represent the relationship between these two parameters. The correlation in apixaban treated patients was less predictive (r = 0.798, p < 0.001) and the formula suggested could not be validated.

Conclusions: In our study, we developed a formula that estimates the anticoagulant activity of rivaroxaban by obtaining INR values. Where anti-FXa assay is unavailable, our proposed formula may be considered as a screening test for rivaroxaban.

What Surgeons Should Know About Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants: A Review

Importance

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly prescribed for patients to treat or prevent arterial or venous thromboembolism. The following 4 NOAC agents are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical use: dabigatran etexilate, apixaban, edoxaban tosylate, and rivaroxaban. A good understanding of these agents' pharmacologic properties is important for surgeons given their marked differences compared with warfarin sodium. This review highlights key practical issues surrounding the use of NOACs in the perioperative setting.

Observations

The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English-language studies from May 1, 2009, until May 1, 2017, for randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and clinical guidelines. From a systematic review of the published literature that included 70 articles and 166 404 patients, this study identified 5 key practical issues surrounding the use of NOACs in the perioperative setting. These include patient populations for which NOAC use is indicated and contraindicated, the timing of NOAC treatment cessation before invasive interventions, management of NOAC-treated patients requiring urgent interventions, the need for "bridging," and the timing of NOAC treatment's reinitiation after invasive interventions. Important findings are as follows: NOAC agents are not recommended for patients with mechanical heart valves or advanced kidney disease (creatinine clearance, <15 mL/min); minimal to no anticoagulant effect remains when therapy with a NOAC is withheld for 48 to 72 hours before surgery in the context of normal kidney function; a reversal agent is clinically available for dabigatran, while reversal agents for apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are under regulatory review; and laboratory testing of the anticoagulant effects of NOACs are not routinely available. There is a paucity of high-quality data on the optimal timing of NOAC cessation and resumption in the perioperative period, particularly for patients who undergo procedures with high bleeding risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

The anticoagulant effect of NOAC agents is predictable but not readily measurable in routine clinical practice. A number of uncertainties remain surrounding the use of these agents in the perioperative setting. Ongoing prospective studies and randomized clinical trials will provide greater clarity on these management issues in the near future.

Factors That Determine the Prothrombin Time in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is widely used to reduce the chance of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is not clear why the prothrombin time (PT) of the international normalized ratio (INR) fails to correlate with treatment using rivaroxaban in patients with AF. In this study, patient characteristics, the rivaroxaban dosage, AF type, drug history, biochemical properties, and hematological profiles were assessed in patients treated with rivaroxaban. In 69 patients with AF receiving rivaroxaban, 27 (39.1%) patients had a normal INR (≤1.1, group 1), 27 (39.1%) patients had a slightly prolonged INR (1.1∼1.5, group 2), and 15 (21.7%) patients had a significantly prolonged INR (>1.5, group 3). Group 1 patients had a higher incidence of a stroke history than did patients in group 2 (P = .026) and group 3 (P = .032). We scored patients with a persistent AF pattern (1 point), paroxysmal AF pattern (0 point), renal function (ie, the creatinine clearance rate in mL/min/1.73 m² of >60 as 0 points, of 30∼60 as 1 point, and of <30 as 2 points), and no history of stroke (1 point), and we found that group 3 had a higher score than groups 2 or 1 (2.9 ± 0.8, 2.4 ± 0.7, and 2 ± 0.7, respectively; P < .05). There were similar incidences of bleeding, stroke, and unexpected hospitalizations among the 3 groups. The PT of the INR is determined by multiple variables in patients with AF receiving rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban-treated patients with AF having different INR values may have similar clinical outcomes.

Laboratory measures of coagulation among trauma patients on NOAs: results of the AAST-MIT

Background

Warfarin is associated with poor outcomes after trauma, an effect correlated with elevations in the international normalized ratio (INR). In contrast, the novel oral anticoagulants (NOAs) have no validated laboratory measure to quantify coagulopathy. We sought to determine if use of NOAs was associated with elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or INR levels among trauma patients or increased clotting times on thromboelastography (TEG).

Methods

This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational study across 16 trauma centers. Patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban were included. Laboratory data were collected at admission and after reversal. Admission labs were compared between medication groups. Traditional measures of coagulopathy were compared with TEG results using Spearman's rank coefficient for correlation. Labs before and after reversal were also analyzed between medication groups.

Results

182 patients were enrolled between June 2013 and July 2015: 50 on dabigatran, 123 on rivaroxaban, and 34 apixaban. INR values were mildly elevated among patients on dabigatran (median 1.3, IQR 1.1-1.4) and rivaroxaban (median 1.3, IQR 1.1-1.6) compared with apixaban (median 1.1, IQR 1.0-1.2). Patients on dabigatran had slightly higher than normal aPTT values (median 35, IQR 29.8-46.3), whereas those on rivaroxaban and apixaban did not. Fifty patients had TEG results. The median values for R, alpha, MA and lysis were normal for all groups. Prothrombin time (PT) and aPTT had a high correlation in all groups (dabigatran p=0.0005, rivaroxaban p<0.0001, and apixaban p<0.0001). aPTT correlated with the R value on TEG in patients on dabigatran (p=0.0094) and rivaroxaban (p=0.0028) but not apixaban (p=0.2532). Reversal occurred in 14%, 25%, and 18% of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban patients, respectively. Both traditional measures of coagulopathy and TEG remained within normal limits after reversal.

Discussion

Neither traditional measures of coagulation nor TEG were able to detect coagulopathy in patients on NOAs.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

The vexed question of whether or not to measure levels of direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) possess high bioavailability, and their anticoagulant effect is more predictable than that of vitamin K antagonists, hence they do not require routine dose adjustment based on laboratory testing. However, there are circumstances when laboratory testing may be useful, including patients who need to undergo surgery or invasive procedures. Most guidelines state that patients on DOAC may safely undergo surgery/invasive procedures by stopping anticoagulation for a few days before intervention without testing if renal function is within normal limits. This review article discusses the pros and cons of measuring (or not measuring) DOAC levels before surgery/invasive procedures by a multidisciplinary team of experts with different background, including the thrombosis laboratory, clinical thrombosis, internal medicine, cardiology and nephrology. The conclusion is that measuring DOAC with dedicated tests before surgical or invasive procedures is important for patient safety. It provides the best and most direct evidence to rule in (or to rule out) clinically relevant concentrations of residual drugs. Regulatory agencies should urgently approve their use in clinical practice. Hospital administrators should make them available, and clinical laboratories should set up the relative methods and make them available to clinicians.

Management of major bleeding and outcomes in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: results from the START-Event registry

The management of major bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is still not well established. START-Events, a branch of the START registry (Survey on anTicoagulated pAtients RegisTer) (NCT02219984), aims to describe the actual management of bleeding or recurrent thrombotic events in routine clinical practice. We here present the results of the management of bleeding patients. The START-Event registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter, international study. Baseline characteristics (demographic, clinical, risk factors) of patients, laboratory data at admission and during follow-up, site of bleeding, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes at the time of hospital discharge and after 6 months were recorded on a web-based case report form. Between January 2015 and December 2016, 117 patients with major bleeding events were enrolled. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) was the indication for treatment in 84% (62% males); 53 patients had intracranial bleeding (13 fatal), 42 had gastrointestinal bleeding (1 fatal), and 22 had bleeding in other sites. Therapeutic interventions for the management of bleeding were performed in 71% of patients. Therapeutic strategies with/without surgery or invasive procedures included: fluid replacement or red blood cells transfusion, prothrombin complex concentrates (3 or 4 factors), antifibrinolytic drugs, and the administration of idarucizumab. Creatinine, blood cell count, and PT/aPTT were the most frequent tests requested, while specific DOAC measurements were performed in 23% of patients. Mortality during hospitalization was 11.9%, at 6-month follow-up 15.5%. Our data confirm a high heterogeneity in the management of bleeding complications in patients treated with DOACs.

Measurement of rivaroxaban concentrations demonstrates lack of clinical utility of a PT, dPT and APTT test in estimating levels

INTRODUCTION

Rivaroxaban concentrations were measured in 127 inpatient samples using an HPLC-MS/MS assay.

METHODS

We compared this measurement with a calibrated anti-Xa assay and performed PT, aPTT and dilute PT tests to assess the value of clot-based assays in clinical decision-making.

RESULTS

The correlation between the anti-Xa assay and the HPLC-MS/MS at therapeutic concentrations was strong (R²  = 0.98). The PT, RecombiPlasTin 2G, and aPTT, Actin FS, showed a linear dose-response but poor correlation (R²  = 0.32 and 0.44, respectively) and at dilutions of 1 in 150 to 1 in 750 the dilute PT assay also showed poor correlation with rivaroxaban concentrations measured by specific assays. A normal PT or aPTT alone did not identify a likely safe rivaroxaban concentration to allow surgery or invasive procedures, but the combination of normal PT and aPTT identified a group of patients with rivaroxaban levels less than 90 ng/mL. Combined normal PT and aPTT had specificity and sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and 0.37 (95% CI 0.1-0.74) for a rivaroxaban concentration < 32 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The PT and aPTT show poor correlation with rivaroxaban levels measured by calibrated anti-Xa and HPLC-MS/MS assays. A normal combined PT and APTT identified low rivaroxaban levels with high specificity but lacked sensitivity. The dPT assay at several dilutions could not be used to quantify rivaroxaban in clinical samples. The utility of these PT, aPTT and dilute PT assays in a clinical setting is very limited, and results generated must be interpreted with caution.

Low drug levels and thrombotic complications in high-risk atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

Essentials Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) do not require laboratory monitoring currently. DOAC specific measurements were performed at trough in patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients who developed thromboembolic events showed lower DOAC plasma levels. This study supports the concept of measuring DOAC levels at steady state.

SUMMARY

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are administered at fixed doses without the need for dose adjustment according to laboratory testing. High interindividual variability in drug blood levels has been shown with all DOACs. To evaluate a possible relationship between DOAC C-trough anticoagulant levels and thromboembolic events, 565 consecutive naive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled in this study performed within the START Laboratory Registry. Methods DOAC-specific measurements (diluted thrombin time or anti-activated factor II calibrated for dabigatran; anti-activated FX calibrated for rivaroxaban or apixaban) at C-trough were performed locally at steady state within 15-25 days after the start of treatment. For each DOAC, the interval of C-trough levels, from the limit of quantification to the highest value, was subdivided into four equal classes, and results were attributed to these classes; the median values of results were also calculated. Thromboembolic complications occurring during 1 year of follow-up were recorded. Results Thromboembolic events (1.8%) occurred in 10 patients who had baseline C-trough levels in the lowest class of drug levels. The incidence of thromboembolic events among patients with DOAC C-trough levels in the lowest level class was 2.4%, and that in the remaining groups was 0%. The patients with thrombotic complications also had a higher mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score than that of the total patient population: 5.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3-6.3 versus 3.0 (95% CI 2.9-3.1). Conclusion In this study cohort, thrombotic complications occurred only in DOAC-treated AF patients who had very low C-trough levels, with a relatively high CHA2 DS2 -VASc score. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary observations.