Clinical and laboratory phenotype variability in type 2M von Willebrand disease

Application of genetic testing for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder, with an estimated symptomatic prevalence of 1 per 1000 in the general population. VWD is characterized by defects in the quantity, quality, or multimeric structure of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a glycoprotein being hemostatically essential in circulation. VWD is classified into 3 principal types: low VWF/type 1 with partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 with virtual absence of VWF, and type 2 with functional abnormalities of VWF, being classified as 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N. A new VWD type has been officially recognized by the ISTH SSC on von Willebrand factor which has also been discussed by the joint ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH 2021 guidelines (ie, type 1C), indicating patients with quantitative deficiency due to an enhanced VWF clearance. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the process of genetic diagnosis has substantially changed and improved accuracy. Therefore, nowadays, patients with type 3 and severe type 1 VWD can benefit from genetic testing as much as type 2 VWD. Specifically, genetic testing can be used to confirm or differentiate a VWD diagnosis, as well as to provide genetic counseling. The focus of this manuscript is to discuss the current knowledge on VWD molecular pathophysiology and the application of genetic testing for VWD diagnosis.

von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. The disorder is characterized by excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. The most common bleeding manifestations of this condition include nosebleeds, bruising, bleeding from minor wounds, menorrhagia or postpartum bleeding in women as well as bleeding after surgery. Other less frequent symptoms include gastrointestinal bleeding, haematomas or haemarthroses. VWD pathophysiology is complex and results from defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein. Quantitative deficiencies are responsible for type 1 VWD with a partial decrease of VWF and type 3 with the complete absence of VWF. Qualitative abnormalities cause type 2 VWD, being further divided into types 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N. Although common, VWD is at risk of misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis owing to several factors, including complex diagnosis, variability of bleeding symptoms, presence of external variables (blood groups and other physiological modifiers such as exercise, thyroid hormones, oestrogens, and ageing), and lack of disease awareness among non-specialist health-care providers. Establishing the correct VWD diagnosis requires an array of specialized phenotypic assays and/or molecular genetic testing of the VWF gene. The management of bleeding includes increasing endogenous VWF levels with desmopressin or infusion of exogenous VWF concentrates (plasma-derived or recombinant). Fibrinolytic inhibitors, topical haemostatic agents and hormonal therapies are used as effective adjunctive measures.

Type 2M/2A von Willebrand disease: a shared phenotype between type 2M and 2A

ABSTRACT

Four variants have been continuously subjected to debate and received different von Willebrand disease (VWD) classifications: p.R1315L, p.R1315C, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C. We chose to comprehensively investigate these variants with full set of VWD tests, protein-modeling predictions and applying structural biology. Patients with p.R1315L, p.R1315C, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C were included. A group with type 2A and 2M was included to better understand similarities and differences. Patients were investigated for phenotypic assays and underlying disease mechanisms. We applied deep protein modeling predictions and structural biology to elucidate the causative effects of variants. Forty-three patients with these variants and 70 with 2A (n = 35) or 2M (n = 35) were studied. Patients with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, or p.R1374C showed a common phenotype between 2M and 2A using von Willebrand factor (VWF):GPIbR/VWF:Ag and VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios and VWF multimeric profile, whereas p.R1315C represented a type 2M phenotype. There was an overall reduced VWF synthesis or secretion in 2M and cases with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C, but not in 2A. Reduced VWF survival was observed in most 2A (77%), 2M (80%), and all 40 cases with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C. These were the only variants that fall at the interface between the A1-A2 domains. p.R1315L/C mutants induce more compactness and internal mobility, whereas p.R1374H/C display a more extended overall geometry. We propose a new classification of type 2M/2A for p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C because they share a common phenotype with 2M and 2A. Our structural analysis shows the unique location of these variants on the A1-A2 domains and their distinctive effect on VWF.

The Role of the von Willebrand Factor Collagen-Binding Assay (VWF:CB) in the Diagnosis and Treatment of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and Way Beyond: A Comprehensive 36-Year History

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay was first reported for use in von Willebrand diagnostics in 1986, by Brown and Bosak. Since then, the VWF:CB has continued to be used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease (VWD) (correctly) and also to help assign the correct subtype, as well as to assist in the monitoring of VWD therapy, especially desmopressin (DDAVP). However, it is important to recognize that the specific value of any VWF:CB is predicated on the use of an optimized VWF:CB, and that not all VWF:CB assays are so optimized. There are some good commercial assays available, but there are also some "not-so-good" commercial assays available, and these may continue to give the VWF:CB "a bad reputation." In addition to VWD diagnosis and management, the VWF:CB found purpose in a variety of other applications, from assessing ADAMTS13 activity, to investigation into acquired von Willebrand syndrome (especially as associated with use of mechanical circulatory support or cardiac assist devices), to assessment of VWF activity in disease states in where an excess of high-molecular-weight VWF may accumulate, and lead to increased (micro)thrombosis risk (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura). The VWF:CB turns 37 in 2023. This review is a celebration of the utility of the VWF:CB over this nearly 40-year history.

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand Disease: Differences in Phenotypic Parameters According to the Affected Domain by Disease-Causing Variants and Assessment of Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) broadly show similar phenotypic parameters, but involve different pathophysiological mechanisms. This report presents the clinical and laboratory profiles of type 2A and type 2M patients genotypically diagnosed at one large center. Higher bleeding score values and a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes were observed in type 2A compared with type 2M, potentially reflective of the absence of large and intermediate von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers in 2A. In type 2A, most of disease-causing variants (DCVs) appeared to be responsible for increased VWF clearance and DCV clustered in the VWF-A1 domain resulted in more severe clinical profiles. In type 2M, DCV in the VWF-A1 domain showed different laboratory patterns, related to either reduced synthesis or shortened VWF survival, and DCV in the VWF-A2 domain showed patterns related mainly to shortened survival. VWF-type 1 collagen binding/Ag (C1B/Ag) showed different patterns according to DCV location: in type 2A VWD, C1B/Ag was much lower when DCVs were located in the VWF-A2 domain. In type 2M with DCV in the VWF-A1domain, C1B/Ag was normal, but with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain, C1B/Ag was low. The higher frequency of major bleeding in VWD 2M patients with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain than that with DCV in the VWF-A1 domain could be a summative effect of abnormal C1B/Ag, on top of the reduced VWF-GPIb binding. In silico modeling suggests that DCV impairing the VWF-A2 domain somehow modulates collagen binding to the VWF-A3 domain. Concomitant normal FVIII:C/Ag and VWFpp/Ag, mainly in type 2M VWD, suggest that other nonidentified pathophysiological mechanisms, neither related to synthesis/retention nor survival of VWF, would be responsible for the presenting phenotype.

von Willebrand factor propeptide missense variants affect anterograde transport to Golgi resulting in ER retention

von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most prevalent congenital bleeding disorder, arises from a deficiency in von Willebrand factor (VWF), which has crucial roles in hemostasis. The present study investigated functional consequences and underlying pathomolecular mechanisms of several VWF propeptide (VWFpp) missense variants detected in our cohort of VWD patients for the first time. Transient expression experiments in HEK293T cells demonstrated that four out of the six investigated missense variants (p.Gly55Glu, p.Val86Glu, p.Trp191Arg, and p.Cys608Trp) severely impaired secretion. Their cotransfections with the wild-type partly corrected VWF secretion, displaying loss of large/intermediate multimers. Immunostaining of the transfected HEK293 cells illustrated the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention of the VWF variants. Docking of the COP I and COP II cargo recruitment proteins, ADP-ribosylation factor 1 and Sec24, onto the N-terminal VWF model (D1D2D'D3) revealed that these variants occur at VWFpp putative interfaces, which can hinder VWF loading at the ER exit quality control. Furthermore, quantitative and automated morphometric exploration of the three-dimensional immunofluorescence images showed changes in the number/size of the VWF storage organelles, Weibel-Palade body (WPB)-like vesicles. The result of this study highlighted the significance of the VWFpp variants on anterograde ER-Golgi trafficking of VWF as well as the biogenesis of WPB-like vesicles.

Laboratory variability in the diagnosis of type 2 VWD variants

Essentials Patients with von Willebrand disease were enrolled in our study. Type 2 VWD diagnoses were based on original test results. Repeat evaluation resulted in many patients receiving a different type 2 diagnosis. Some genetic variants were particularly likely to move type 2 subcategories. ABSTRACT: Introduction Type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) refers to patients with a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor. Accurate diagnosis of type 2 VWD subtypes can be challenging. Aim of the study To compare the historical diagnosis of type 2 VWD with current laboratory testing. Methods Subjects were enrolled in the Zimmerman Program either because of a preexisting diagnosis of VWD (retrospective cohort) or from evaluation for bleeding symptoms or suspected VWD (prospective cohort). Original diagnosis was assigned by the local center and central diagnosis was based on central laboratory testing. Results Two hundred and seventeen index cases in the retrospective cohort and 35 subjects in the prospective cohort carried a local diagnosis of type 2 VWD (29% and 6% of enrolled index cases, respectively). In the retrospective cohort, the diagnosis was confirmed in 66% of cases with a preexisting diagnosis of 2A, 77% 2B, 54% 2M, and 72% 2N. In the prospective cohort, 31% were confirmed 2A, 60% 2B, 23% 2M, and 100% 2N. Several genetic variants were repeatedly implicated in subjects with changed diagnosis: p.M1304R, p.R1315C, p.R1374C, and p.R1374H. Conclusions Both the prospective and retrospective cohorts demonstrated consistent variation in subjects whose diagnosis changed between 2A, 2B, and 2M. The importance of accurately diagnosing type 2 VWD may be most significant in the 2B subtype given potential concerns with the use of desmopressin in type 2B VWD. Some genetic variants appear in multiple types of VWD, making specific diagnoses challenging.

Improving diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: Reference ranges for von Willebrand factor multimer distribution

BACKGROUND

Phenotypic von Willebrand disease (VWD) classification requires multiple tests including analysis of multimeric distributions von Willebrand factor (VWF) and evaluation of its structure. VWF multimer analysis is labor intensive, nonstandardized, and limited to specialized laboratories. A commercial semiautomatic assay, HYDRAGEL VW multimer assay (H5/11VWM, Sebia), has become available.

OBJECTIVES

Establishment of reference ranges for H5/11VWM to improve VWD classification.

METHODS

Implementation validation, establishment and validation of normal and pathological reference intervals (NRIs/PRIs), comparison with in-house method using 40 healthy volunteers and 231 VWD patients.

RESULTS

Qualitative and quantitative validation of NRI obtained sensitivity of 88% and 79%, respectively, for type 2. Comparison of the two methods showed an overall concordance of 86% with major conflicting results in all atypical 2B (n = 7) and 50% 2M-GPIb (n = 41) showing quantitative and qualitative multimeric loss, that was not detected with in-house method. We were able to use established PRIs, with 73% validity in type 2 cases, to distinguish individual type 2A subtypes (IIA, IIC, IID, IIE) from 2M and 2B.

CONCLUSION

H5/11VWM could be used for all clinical purposes because its reliability and its rapid and accurate diagnostic ability and reduced observer bias. Although H5/11VWM cannot evaluate triplet structures, we were able to define 2A subtypes by stripping back to the percentage of intermediate/high-molecular-weight multimers. H5/11HWM could be an efficient and widely available alternative for the "gold standard" technique.

The elusive and heterogeneous pattern of type 2M von Willebrand disease: A diagnostic challenge

Type 2M is a very heterogeneous form of von Willebrand disease (VWD) associated with impaired platelet and von Willebrand factor (VWF) interactions not due to a lack of large VWF multimers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate type 2M heterogeneity and to establish the most appropriate diagnostic flowchart.

METHODS

Hemostatic and genetic VWF analyses were performed in 14 type 2M VWD patients carrying the p.G1324S, p.R1374H, p.R1374C, p.A1344_A1350del, or p.F1293L mutations.

RESULTS

PFA-100 was always significantly prolonged, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) and VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) greatly reduced or absent. Plasma VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) was reduced except in the p.G1324S patient, while platelet VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in the p.R1374C patients. The ratio of collagen binding (VWF:CB) to VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in patients carrying the p.R1374H and p.A1344_A1350del mutations, whose large VWF multimers were slightly reduced. Multimer patterns were normal or lacking in large oligomers, or with larger than normal VWF components.

CONCLUSIONS

Only PFA100, RIPA and VWF:RCo were always abnormal. We thus propose a minimal diagnostic test battery: RIPA (demonstrating the defective VWF-platelet interaction), VWF:Ag (exploring VWF synthesis), and VWF:CB and its ratio (to explore multimer patterns). Other tests would only serve for confirmation, if necessary.

Evaluation of a new commercial method for von Willebrand factor multimeric analysis

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric distribution is useful for subclassification of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Multimer analysis has historically been a manual, labor-intensive laboratory-developed test. The first commercial method for multimeric analysis was recently developed that utilizes a single instrument for gel electrophoresis, staining, and densitometry. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the performance characteristics of the new commercial method.

METHODS

Studies performed with the commercial method included evaluation of accuracy (method comparison), reference intervals (establishment of normal migration patterns in normal donor specimens), precision (multimer pattern reproducibility), and analytical sensitivity.

RESULTS

In the method comparison studies, concordant interpretations were obtained in 19 of 24 comparisons, including normal and abnormal specimens. The 5 specimens with discordant interpretations all involved slight differences and none were considered clinically significant. Thirty-eight normal donor specimens demonstrated normal multimer patterns. Multimer pattern reproducibility was demonstrated in normal and abnormal controls tested on each gel. In the sensitivity studies, adequate visualization of multimers was determined to require VWF protein concentrations of approximately 5%-10% of normal.

CONCLUSION

The commercial multimer method is a streamlined test that demonstrates comparable performance characteristics to our current laboratory-developed method and that provides the advantage of both electrophoresis gels and densitometry scans to aid interpretation.

Current issues in diagnosis and treatment of von Willebrand disease

Clinically, von Willebrand disease (VWD) presents as mucosal bleeding caused by a decreased quantity or quality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Diagnosis of VWD requires careful consideration of patient specific factors, bleeding symptoms, and laboratory results. Patients with borderline low VWF levels remain challenging, given that low VWF is not necessarily a guarantee of bleeding, but is present in many patients with symptoms, and treatment of low VWF may improve bleeding. Laboratory diagnosis of VWD is complex and no single test can determine the presence or absence of functional VWF. Historically, VWF binding to platelet GPIbα was measured by the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo); a new assay using platelet GPIbα in the absence of ristocetin (VWF:GPIbM) is gradually replacing the VWF:RCo due to improved accuracy in diagnosis. VWF binding to collagen is a separate function, and requires specific testing to determine if a collagen binding defect is present. Regardless of these laboratory complexities, clinicians can empirically treat VWD to alleviate bleeding symptoms by raising VWF levels through desmopressin or VWF concentrate. Recombinant VWF is now available, but clinicians may need to add an initial dose of FVIII when treating emergency bleeds.

Combined effects of two mutations in von Willebrand disease 2M phenotype

BACKGROUND

Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD2M) is usually characterized by VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag<0.6 and normal multimeric profile; desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge test commonly shows poor response of VWF:RCo.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the bleeding tendency and the laboratory phenotype in a patient carrying two heterozygous mutations affecting VWF-A1 domain and VWF-A2 domain.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A 12-year-old patient (O blood group) with severe hemorrhagic tendency was phenotypically and genotypically analyzed; his parents were also studied.

RESULTS

The proband showed decrease FVIII:C, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, and VWF:CB6/VWF:Ag ratios, but normal platelet count, VWF:CB1/VWF:Ag ratio, VWFpp and multimeric pattern, suggesting a VWD2M phenotype. The DDAVP challenge test, compared to controls (VWD2M patients with mutations in VWF-A1 domain), showed lower increase of FVIII:C and VWF:Ag than in heterozygous, but very similar to homozygous control. Two mutations were found in heterozygous and trans presentation: p.Pro1648fs*45 and a novel missense mutation, p.Arg1426Cys. The mother was p.Arg1426Cys heterozygous carrier, with few clinical symptoms. The father was asymptomatic, with no mutations. The p.Pro1648fs*45 was considered an apparent de novo mutation; proband's AS-PCR revealed mosaicism in the paternal allele. According to the predicted models, p.Arg1426Cys would not be affecting the binding of GPIbα to A1 domain, whereas p.Pro1648fs*45 seems to modify the folding of A2 domain, and in this way, it would affect the binding to GPIbα and type VI collagen. We believe that the combination of these two heterozygous mutations, in a child with O blood group, could result in a defective phenotype enhancer.