Clinical course of patients with symptomatic isolated superficial vein thrombosis: the ICARO follow-up study

Predictive factors of clot propagation in patients with superficial venous thrombosis towards deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A subset of patients with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) experiences clot propagation towards deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of this systematic review is to identify all clinically relevant cross-sectional and prognostic factors for predicting thrombotic complications in patients with SVT.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched until 3 March 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Original research studies with patients with SVT, DVT and/or PE as the outcome and presenting cross-sectional or prognostic predictive factors.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

The CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling (CHARMS) checklist for prognostic factor studies was used for systematic extraction of study characteristics. Per identified predictive factor, relevant estimates of univariable and multivariable predictor-outcome associations were extracted, such as ORs and HRs. Estimates of association for the most frequently reported predictors were summarised in forest plots, and meta-analyses with heterogeneity were presented. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used for risk of bias assessment and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) for assessing the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included (n=10 111 patients). The most reported predictive factors were high age, male sex, history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), absence of varicose veins and cancer. Pooled effect estimates were heterogenous and ranged from OR 3.12 (95% CI 1.75 to 5.59) for the cross-sectional predictor cancer to OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.53) for the prognostic predictor high age. The level of evidence was rated very low to low. Most studies were scored high or moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the pooled estimates of the predictors high age, male sex, history of VTE, cancer and absence of varicose veins showed predictive potential in isolation, variability in study designs, lack of multivariable adjustment and high risk of bias prevent firm conclusions. High-quality, multivariable studies are necessary to be able to identify individual SVT risk profiles.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021262819.

Superficial vein thrombosis and its relationship with malignancies: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The interrelation of cancer with venous thromboembolism is established, yet the specific impact on the incidence and progression of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between SVT and malignancies, focusing on risk factors, presentation, course and complications.

METHODS

A single-center prospective observational study of patients diagnosed with DVT or SVT referred to a venous thromboembolism clinic between January 2013 and April 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 632 patients, 205 presented with SVT at referral, 16.6% having active cancer. Significant associations were found between active cancer and the risk of developing proximal SVT (RR 1.54 [1.18-2.03] p < 0.01), SVT within 3 cm from junction (RR 2.01 [1.13-3.72] p = 0.019), bilateral SVT (RR 8.38 [2.10-33.43] p < 0.01) and SVT affecting multiple veins (RR 2.42 [1.40-4.20] p < 0.01), with a higher risk of persistence (RR 1.51 [1.18-1.95] p < 0.01) and progression (RR 5.75 [2.23-14.79] p < 0.01) at initial assessment. Patients with SVT and no malignancy history demonstrated an elevated risk for new-onset cancer during follow-up (RR 1.43 [1.13-1.18] p = 0.022), especially in cases of proximal or bilateral SVT, initial progression or subsequent DVT or PE. No significant differences were observed in persistence, recurrence or complications during initial evaluation or follow-up across different pharmacological treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Research suggests a probable link between cancer history and the development of SVT. SVT presented more severely in cancer patients. SVT, especially in its more complex forms, could serve as a predictive marker for the future development of cancer. Treatment approaches varied, no significant differences in outcomes were noted.

A systematic review and meta-analysis for the association between duration of anticoagulation therapy and the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower limb superficial venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the association between the duration of systemic anticoagulation therapy (ACT) and the risk of further venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using searches of Medline and Cochrane Library databases in September 2023. Papers that provided VTE incidence within mid-term follow-up of ≥45 days in patients who received any ACT were included. Patients were categorized into subgroups according to the course of treatment: (1) no ACT (0 days); (2) ACT of ≤14 days; (3) ACT of 15 to 30 days; (4) ACT of 31 to 45 days; and (5) ACT of >45 days. Reported events were transformed to events per 100 patient-years, and a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled rates for proportions. The primary outcome (VTE) was a combination of SVT progression or recurrence with the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Secondary outcomes included major and clinically relevant non-major or minor bleeding.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (10 randomized controlled trials and 14 cohort studies) combining outcomes in 12,341 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Minimum VTE and SVT recurrence or progression rates were observed with the ACT duration of 31 to 45 days of 16.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4-23.3) and 8.2 (95% CI, 3.1-15.8) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Minimum DVT and PE rates observed with the treatment duration of 15 to 30 days were 5.5 (95% CI, 2.8-9.1) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.3) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Short-term treatment of ≤14 days was associated with the highest rates of VTE of 59.7 (95% CI, 37.7-86.4), DVT of 13.7 (95% CI, 9.6-18.4), and PE of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.4-5.6) events per 100 patient-years. Major bleeding rates were unrelated to the duration of ACT and did not exceed 0.5 events per 100 patient-years. The highest rate of clinically relevant non-major or minor bleeding was observed with ACT duration of 31 to 45 days of 14.2 (95% CI, 5.5-26.8) events per 100 patient-years. The most common risk factors for VTE included male sex, cancer, personal history of DVT, PE, or SVT, and thrombosis of non-varicose veins.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged systemic anticoagulation is associated with the tendency to decrease VTE rates in patients with lower limb SVT.

Determinants of Late Venous Thromboembolic Events After Acute Isolated Superficial Vein Thrombosis in Daily Practice: 12 Month Results of the INSIGHTS-SVT Study

OBJECTIVE

Long term incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) was investigated.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, patients with acute SVT were treated at the discretion of the responsible physician. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic VTE including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and recurrent or extending SVT. The primary safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, recorded at periodic clinic visits over a 12 month period.

RESULTS

The mean age of 872 patients with 12 month follow up was 60.6 ± 14.5 years, 64.5% were female, 80.1% had chronic venous disease (defined as chronic venous insufficiency and or varicose veins), and 41.9% had a history of VTE. They were receiving fondaparinux in 62.1% (mean duration 34.9 ± 15.7 days), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in 25.0% (mean duration 26.2 ± 23.2 days), any other anticoagulants in 6.2%, and no anticoagulant in 6.7%. At 12 months, 108 patients (14.3%) achieved the primary efficacy outcome. The most common VTE event was recurrent or extending SVT in 11.0%, followed by symptomatic DVT in 2.7%, symptomatic PE in 2.4%, hospitalisation due to VTE in 1.8%, and death in 1.1%. Clinically relevant bleeding events occurred in 2.1% of patients, and major bleedings in 0.3%. By drug, the rate of the primary efficacy outcome was highest in the LMWH group (22.4%) and lowest in the fondaparinux group (10.4%). In a multivariable model, patients with events between three months and 12 months were significantly more likely to have higher BMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; p = .002), history of VTE (HR 2.89; p = .002), and severe systemic infections (HR 7.59; p = .006).

CONCLUSION

The risk of symptomatic VTE remained elevated over 12 months of follow up. Therefore, anticoagulation beyond 45 days may be considered in patients with risk factors. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02699151.].

Three-Month Outcomes in Cancer Patients with Superficial or Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Lower Limbs: Results from the RIETE Registry

Background: The clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with lower-limb isolated superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) have not been consistently evaluated. Methods: We used data in the RIETE registry to compare the clinical characteristics and 90-day outcomes for patients with: (1) active cancer and lower-limb SVT; (2) active cancer and lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT); (3) lower-limb SVT without cancer. The primary outcomes included subsequent symptomatic SVT, DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). Secondary outcomes were major bleeding and death. Results: From March 2015 to April 2021, there were 110 patients with cancer and SVT, 1695 with cancer and DVT, and 1030 with SVT but no cancer. Most patients in all subgroups (93%, 99% and 96%, respectively) received anticoagulants, while those with SVT received lower daily doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (114 ± 58, 163 ± 44, and 106 ± 50 IU/kg, respectively). During the first 90 days, 101 patients (3.6%) developed subsequent VTE (PE 47, DVT 41, SVT 13), whereas 72 (2.5%) had major bleeding and 282 (9.9%) died. Among the three groups, 90-day events were, respectively: VTE at rates of 7.3%, 4.0% and 2.4%; major bleeding at rates of 2.7%, 3.9% and 0.3%; mortality at rates of 8.2%, 16% and 0.3%. Between D90 and D180, only one SVT recurrence and one death occurred in SVT cancer patients. In multivariable analysis, cancer was associated with subsequent VTE (HR = 2.04; 1.15–3.62), while initial presentation as SVT or DVT were not associated with a different risk. Conclusions: The risk for subsequent VTE (including symptomatic SVT, DVT or PE) was similar in cancer patients with isolated SVT than in those with isolated DVT.

[Superficial Vein Thrombosis]

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS

 A large German registry on superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) documents that risk profiles, clinical presentation and treatment patterns are highly variable in patients with SVT, including a large variation in anticoagulation treatment modalities, intensities and durations. Inspite of a high percentage of initial anticoagulation there is a substantial risk of subsequent venous thromboembolism (VTE), recurrences or extension after three months. Inspite of current guideline recommendations, one third of the patients receives heparins, oral anticoagulants or no anticoagulation at all. At initial presentation about one quarter of the patients with SVT have a concomitant, frequently asymptomatic VTE. Risk factors for this complication include prior hospitalization, immobilization, prior VTE, autoimmune disorders, higher age, cancer and SVT occurring in a non-varicose veins or SVT-extension into the perforator veins. These risk factors are also associated with thromboembolic complications during follow-up.

TREATMENT

 Based on a large placebo-controlled trial with clinical endpoints (The CALISTO-Study), guidelines recommend Fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily administered over 4 to 6 weeks. Alternatively, an intermediate dose of low molecular weight heparin can be considered. In high-risk patients, rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily was noninferior compared to Fondaparinux. A rebound of VTE recurrences was observed in both study arms after treatment had been discontinued after 45 days. Further studies are required to determine whether treatment needs to be extended beyond 45 days in high-risk patients.

Management of superficial venous thrombosis based on individual risk profiles: protocol for the development and validation of three prognostic prediction models in large primary care cohorts

BACKGROUND

Superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) is considered a benign thrombotic condition in most patients. However, it also can cause serious complications, such as clot progression to deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Although most SVT patients are encountered in primary healthcare, studies on SVT nearly all were focused on patients seen in the hospital setting. This paper describes the protocol of the development and external validation of three prognostic prediction models for relevant clinical outcomes in SVT patients seen in primary care: (i) prolonged (painful) symptoms within 14 days since SVT diagnosis, (ii) for clot progression to DVT or PE within 45 days and (iii) for clot recurrence within 12 months.

METHODS

Data will be used from four primary care routine healthcare registries from both the Netherlands and the UK; one UK registry will be used for the development of the prediction models and the remaining three will be used as external validation cohorts. The study population will consist of patients ≥18 years with a diagnosis of SVT. Selection of SVT cases will be based on a combination of ICPC/READ/Snowmed coding and free text clinical symptoms. Predictors considered are sex, age, body mass index, clinical SVT characteristics, and co-morbidities including (history of any) cardiovascular disease, diabetes, autoimmune disease, malignancy, thrombophilia, pregnancy or puerperium and presence of varicose veins. The prediction models will be developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis techniques for models i and ii, and for model iii, a Cox proportional hazards model will be used. They will be validated by internal-external cross-validation as well as external validation.

DISCUSSION

There are currently no prediction models available for predicting the risk of serious complications for SVT patients presenting in primary care settings. We aim to develop and validate new prediction models that should help identify patients at highest risk for complications and to support clinical decision making for this understudied thrombo-embolic disorder. Challenges that we anticipate to encounter are mostly related to performing research in large, routine healthcare databases, such as patient selection, endpoint classification, data harmonisation, missing data and avoiding (predictor) measurement heterogeneity.

[Parnaparin sodium - modern therapy options and prevention of venous thromboembolic complications]

Venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC) including pulmonary embolism and acute thrombosis of deep and superficial veins of the lower extremities are often observed in postoperative period. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is a common remedy for prevention and treatment of VTEC due to high efficiency, safety, easy use and dosage. According to the modern literature data, LMWH is characterized by different effectiveness in relation to VTEC and risk of bleeding in patients after surgical and traumatological procedures, as well as in ones with severe forms of chronic venous diseases. However, their antithrombin activity varies significantly depending on mean molecular weight. The authors analyze LMWH action mechanism, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features of LMWH, in particular parnaparin sodium. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of this remedy for various forms of VTEC (superficial and deep vein thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, complicated forms of chronic venous diseases), its advantages for prevention of VTEC after various surgical and orthopedic interventions are considered.