Use of direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome

Return emergency department visits for recurrent pulmonary embolism symptoms in children and adolescents

Rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) in children have steadily increased over the past 2 decades. Patient outcomes after hospital discharge are poorly understood, and many patients experience recurrent or persistent chest pain or dyspnea, prompting a return to care. This retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PE at a large children's hospital over a 9.5-year period was performed to evaluate rates of return to the emergency department (ED) for PE-related symptoms, and to determine the utility of repeat computed tomography angiography (CTA) in this population. Ninety-six patients were diagnosed with PE during the study period. Forty-two percent of patients (n = 40) returned to the ED for PE-related symptoms and a total of 74 repeat CTAs were performed. Among those who had return visits, the mean number of return visits was 3 and the mean number of repeat CTAs was 1.8. The median time to return to the ED was 34 days. Logistic regression analysis identified increased age and female sex as risk factors for return ED visits. Eight percent of the cohort experienced PE recurrence. Recurrent PE was observed only in those with persistent or new thrombotic risk factors and was uncommon in those who remained on appropriate anticoagulation. Future work should focus on the development of a risk stratification system to identify patients at low risk of recurrence in order to minimize repeat CTA imaging.

Development of a risk assessment scale for use by nurses to assess the risk of deep vein thrombosis in gynaecology in China: A Delphi-based study

AIM

Risk assessment models for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) used worldwide are based on multidisciplinary data from Western countries. We aimed to establish a DVT risk assessment model that is applicable to Chinese patients with gynaecological conditions.

DESIGN

A risk assessment tool for DVT in gynaecology using the Delphi method.

METHODS

A three-round Delphi study was conducted among experts who were asked to rate the importance of each risk factor in the Caprini scale. The consensus for each item was defined as a mean rating of >3 and a coefficient of variation (CV) of <0.5 in the first round, as CV <0.3 in the second round.

RESULTS

Eleven experts participated in the Delphi method, with a response rate of 100%. Kendall's coefficients of concordance (W) were 0.264 and 0.322 in the first and second rounds, respectively (p < 0.001). The DVT risk assessment scale includes 8 dimensions and 34 items.

Bilateral adrenal haemorrhage in antiphospholipid syndrome and a short review of the literature

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an uncommon autoantibody-mediated condition characterised by acquired thrombophilia resulting in recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis. An inciting factor allows for the exposure of endothelial phospholipids, causing antigen formation and subsequent creation of antibodies. A woman in her 70s presented after vehicular trauma, suffering broken ribs, pneumothorax and incidentally discovered left adrenal haemorrhage. Two weeks later she presented with acute-onset abdominal pain and was found to have a right adrenal gland haemorrhage on CT imaging without interval trauma occurring. The patient had antiphospholipid antibody laboratory studies drawn and was given intravenous heparin with a bridge to warfarin at discharge. Laboratory results returned positive for lupus anticoagulant, beta-2 glycoprotein and anticardiolipin antibodies indicating triple positivity, with repeated laboratory tests positive in 12 weeks' time, confirming the diagnosis. Bilateral adrenal haemorrhage, rather than traditional venous thromboembolism, was the presenting pathology in this patient's diagnosis of APS.

Thromboembolic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS): Efficacy and Safety of Different Anticoagulants-Results of the APSantiCO Registry

Background: The particular challenge in dealing with patients with thromboembolic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is to establish an adequate therapy regime, as patients suffer from an increased risk of relapse despite antithrombotic treatment (ATT). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the standard medication of choice. The current data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in APS patients remain limited. Methods: The results of the retrospective APSantiCO registry are presented. In 80 patients with APS, the efficacy and safety of different ATT regimens were analyzed. Results: At the time of inclusion, 43.8% of patients were treated with VKA and 36.3% with DOAC. Medication regimes changed several times and 279 treatment phases were further analyzed with a total treatment length of 7529 months. The incidence of recurrent arterial thrombosis was significantly larger in the DOAC group compared with the VKA group (p < 0.001), while the incidence of recurrent venous thrombosis was comparable between both groups, as was the incidence of bleedings. Heavy menstrual bleeding was the most frequently observed bleeding complication. Conclusions: The data suggest that DOAC may be an alternative to VKA for APS patients with venous thromboembolism, while VKA should be used in APS-related arterial thrombosis.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods

We performed a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We also performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with APS.

Results

Five RCTs involving 648 patients with APS (330 in DOAC-treated and 318 in control groups) were included in the meta-analysis. Among the patients included in the analysis, 29 (8.8%) patients experienced recurrent thrombosis in the DOAC treatment group, and 10 patients (3.1%) had thrombosis recurrence in the warfarin treatment group, resulting in a higher incidence in DOAC-treated than in the warfarin-treated groups [odds ratio (OR) = 2.163, 95% CI = 0.985–4.748, p = 0.055]. Incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher in DOAC-treated patients than in warfarin-treated patients (OR = 5.168, 95% CI = 1.567–17.04, p = 0.007). Stroke and thrombosis occurrences were significantly higher in the triple positivity group than in the warfarin therapy group (OR = 12.03, 95% CI = 2.249–64.36, p = 0.004; OR = 2.940, 95% CI = 1.016–8.504, p = 0.047). However, venous thrombosis occurrences did not differ significantly between the DOAC-treated and warfarin-treated groups. There were no significant differences between the DOAC and warfarin groups in terms of any bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

DOACs were associated with higher rates of arterial thrombosis than warfarin in patients with APS, especially in the triple-positive group. However, a higher risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was not found in APS patients treated with DOACs compared to those treated with warfarin.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with single antibody-positive anti-phospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) remains unclear. Warfarin has been shown to be superior to DOACs among high-risk APLS patients (particularly those with triple-positive APLS). However, it remains unknown whether DOACs may be appropriate for lower-risk patients such as those with single-positive APLS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study comparing the risk of recurrent thrombosis among single-positive APLS patients treated with DOACs (apixaban or rivaroxaban), and those treated with warfarin.

RESULTS

One-hundred-forty-three single-positive APLS patients, newly started on anticoagulation following a first thrombotic event, were included. Median follow-up was 54 months (IQR 29-73 months). Ninety-one patients (64%) received warfarin and 52 patients (36%) received a DOAC. Six patients (6.6%) who received warfarin experienced a recurrent thrombotic event compared with 3 of 52 (5.8%) patients who received a DOAC (p = .845). There was no difference in event-free survival between groups (HR DOAC:Warfarin = 0.952, 95% CI 0.232 - 3.908). Major bleeding was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that DOACs may be a safe and effective option for patients with single-positive APLS. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Towards personalized antithrombotic management with drugs and devices across the cardiovascular spectrum

Intravascular thrombus formation and embolization are among the most frequent events leading to a number of cardiovascular conditions with high morbidity and mortality. The underlying causes are stasis of the circulating blood, genetic and acquired coagulation disorders, and reduced antithrombotic or prothrombotic properties of the vascular wall (Virchow's triad). In the venous system, intravascular thrombi can cause venous thrombosis and pulmonary and even peripheral embolism including ischaemic stroke [through a patent foramen ovale (PFO)]. Thrombi in the left atrium and its appendage or ventricle form in the context of atrial fibrillation and infarction, respectively. Furthermore, thrombi can form on native or prosthetic aortic valves, within the aorta (in particular at sites of ulcers, aortic dissection, and abdominal aneurysms), and in cerebral and peripheral arteries causing stroke and critical limb ischaemia, respectively. Finally, thrombotic occlusion may occur in arteries supplying vital organs such the heart, brain, kidney, and extremities. Thrombus formation and embolization can be managed with anticoagulants and devices depending on where they form and embolize and on patient characteristics. Vitamin K antagonists are preferred in patients with mechanical valves, while novel oral anticoagulants are first choice in most other cardiovascular conditions, in particular venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. As anticoagulants are associated with a risk of bleeding, devices such as occluders of a PFO or the left atrial appendage are preferred in patients with an increased bleeding risk. Platelet inhibitors such as aspirin and/or P2Y12 antagonists are preferred in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease either alone or in combination depending on the clinical condition. A differential and personalized use of anticoagulants, platelet inhibitors, and devices is recommended and reviewed in this article.

Evaluation of Apixaban in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Several guidelines endorsed the indefinite use warfarin or heparin-containing products for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and secondary prevention and discouraged the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, adequate anticoagulation despite warfarin therapy remains a challenge in APS patients. Using DOACs in APS patients is seen in clinical practice, despite the lack of evidence to support their use in this population. In this case series, we aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apixaban use in nine patients with primary or secondary APS at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). All patients presented with APS and received apixaban with or without concomitant antiplatelet. Three patients had double positivity, and two patients had triple positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Some patients tolerated apixaban during the follow-up period, but recurrent VTE and stroke were reported in some of them. Bleeding complications were evident in some cases as well. In conclusion, warfarin remains the best choice to prevent VTE recurrence in patients with APS. On the other side, apixaban use in patients with APS may have some safety and effectiveness concerns evidenced by VTE recurrence and bleeding complications. The safety and effectiveness of utilizing apixaban in APS patients need to be assessed in well-controlled randomized trials.

Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulation Agents as Thromboprophylaxis in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder that causes venous, arterial and small-vessel thrombosis, pregnancy loss, and premature birth. Cardiac valvular disease, renal thrombotic microangiopathy, thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and cognitive impairment are some of its other clinical symptoms. Antiphospholipid antibodies cause endothelial cells, monocytes, and platelets to become activated, as well as an increase in tissue factor and thromboxane A2. Complement activation might play a key function in pathogenesis. Long-term oral anticoagulation is used to treat thrombosis, and individuals having arterial episodes should be treated quickly. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), as well as those with solely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome, should get primary thromboprophylaxis. Obstetric care is based on a combination of medical and obstetric high-risk management, as well as aspirin and heparin therapy. Possible supplementary therapy for this condition is hydroxychloroquine. Statins, rituximab, and novel anticoagulant medicines are all potential future treatments for non-pregnant individuals with antiphospholipid syndrome. We aim to review the role of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as thromboprophylactic drugs in the treatment of APS in this article. The treatment of venous thromboembolism has been transformed by a new class of DOACs. These drugs, such as rivaroxaban, function by inhibiting factor Xa directly. Not only do they have known anticoagulant actions, but they also obviate the need for dosage monitoring and modification, in contrast to warfarin. We conducted an exhaustive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar Indexes using the keywords "Antiphospholipid syndrome," "thromboprophylaxis," and "oral anticoagulants" up to September 2021. We found that DOACs have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin in a variety of anticoagulation situations in a number of high-powered clinical studies. In many hypercoagulable conditions such as APS, DOACs are quickly establishing themselves as first-line therapy. This article is focused on comprehensively reviewing the mechanism of action of DOACs, their role as thromboprophylactic drugs, risks and complications of DOACs, and comparing their efficacy with the standard treatment protocol and warfarin.

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the International Guidelines

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) requires long-term anticoagulation to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used in APS patients, but contradictory guidelines recommendations on their use do exist. We performed a systematic review of literature including studies investigating the role of DOACs in APS patients. At this aim, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 14 studies which investigated the use of DOACs in patients with APS, of which 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs, 7 case series and 3 cohort studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective). Among DOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used (n = 531), followed by dabigatran (n = 90) and apixaban (n = 46). Regarding guidelines indications, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend against the use of DOACs in all APS patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), British Society for Haematology (BSH), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance provided more detailed indications stating that warfarin should be the first-choice treatment but DOACs may be considered in patients (1) already on a stable anticoagulation with a DOAC, (2) with low-quality anticoagulation by warfarin, (3) unwilling/unable to undergo INR monitoring, (4) with contraindications or serious adverse events under warfarin. Patients with arterial APS or triple positivity should be treated with warfarin while venous APS with single or double positivity may be candidate to DOACs, but high-quality studies are needed.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: a clinical perspective

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thromboinflammatory disease with a variety of clinical phenotypes. Primary thrombosis prophylaxis should take an individualized risk stratification approach. Moderate-intensity vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin remains the primary strategy for secondary thrombosis prophylaxis among APS patients, especially for patients with predominantly venous disease. For now, direct oral anti-coagulants should be avoided in most APS patients, especially those with history of arterial manifestations. Obstetric APS management should be tailored based on an individual patient's antiphospholipid antibody profile, and obstetric and thrombotic history. Pharmacological agents beyond anticoagulants may be considered for the management of microthrombotic and nonthrombotic manifestations of APS, although more data are needed. A relatively recent discovery in the area of APS pathogenesis is the implication of neutrophil extracellular traps in thrombin generation and initiation of inflammatory cascades. APS is a complex thromboinflammatory disease with a broad clinical spectrum. Personalized therapy according to an individual's unique thrombosis and obstetric risk should be advocated.

Prevalence of autoantibodies directed against prothrombin in unprovoked venous thromboembolism

The anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the laboratory detection of at least one of three anti-phospholipid autoantibodies (lupus anticoagulant, or anti-cardiolipin or anti-β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies) in the clinical setting of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity in a patient. Recognising APS and administering appropriate secondary thromboprophylaxis is important to reduce risk of recurrent thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. In some instances, patients having clinical manifestations highly suggestive of APS are persistently negative for these antibodies but instead have other autoantibodies. Autoantibodies directed against prothrombin (PT) have been associated with increased thrombotic risk and comprise anti-prothrombin (aPT) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. Detection of aPT and aPS/PT may help stratify patients for more effective treatment, however, their prevalence among patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown and determination of their frequencies is the objective of this study. Sera from 148 patients with unprovoked VTE were analysed. Autoantibodies directed against PT collectively, aPT and aPS/PT were present in 24.3%, 14.9% and 13.5%, respectively. Prevalence of these autoantibodies in unprovoked VTE is much lower compared to cohorts comprising mainly patients with systemic autoimmune disorders. Detection of these autoantibodies in unprovoked VTE has potential therapeutic implications for patients including the duration of anticoagulation and administration, or otherwise, of direct oral anticoagulants. Data from this study will assist in the design of future clinical studies to estimate risk of recurrent VTE and to determine optimal management.

Rivaroxaban: Expanded Role in Cardiovascular Disease Management-A Literature Review

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and as prophylaxis after hip and knee surgery after approval by the Food and Drug Administration. In the last decade, DOACs were studied for various indications; this review is focused on rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, which is used in an expanded evidence-based fashion for coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, malignancy, and prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in acute medical illnesses.

Management of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Although venous thromboembolism is the most common manifestation, thrombotic events in APS may also occur in virtually any vascular bed, with cerebral circulation being the arterial territory most commonly affected. As APS is a heterogeneous condition, its management should be tailored with a patient-centred approach based on individual risk assessment, which includes the aPL profile, concomitant auto-immune diseases, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Although literature data are conflicting regarding primary prophylaxis, there is some evidence indicating that antiplatelet agents may reduce the risk of a first thrombotic event in individuals with a high-risk profile. In patients with thrombotic APS, current evidence-based guidelines recommend lifelong vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), preferably warfarin. The optimal intensity of anticoagulation following arterial thrombosis remains controversial. Arterial thrombosis should be treated either with high-intensity warfarin at a target INR > 3.0, or low-dose aspirin (LDA) combined with moderate-intensity warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0). It is recommended to avoid direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with high-risk APS, mainly those with triple-positive PL and previous arterial events. They would only be used exceptionally in selected patients with low-risk venous thromboembolism (VTE). In low-risk VTE patients currently treated with a DOAC due to warfarin intolerance or a previous unstable International Normalized Ratio on warfarin, the decision of continuing DOACs would be taken in carefully selected patients. In women with obstetric APS, the combination therapy with LDA plus heparin remains the conventional strategy.

Natural history of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis treated with warfarin

We report on the natural history of a cohort of patients presenting with transient ischemic attack or stroke and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis treated with warfarin.Patients with valvular vegetations on echocardiography, stroke, or transient ischemic attack presenting to a single neurologist were included. All patients were treated with warfarin until the vegetation resolved or for two years, then were switched to aspirin and had at least one clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.Twenty-nine patients were included and followed for a median of 27 months. Average age was 42 years and 72% were female. Two patients had vegetations on two valves. Five patients (17%) had recurrent strokes, three had systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibodies, one had antiphospholipid antibodies alone and one had neither condition. Three of the five patients did not have resolution of the vegetation at the time of the event. The valvular vegetations resolved in 23 of the 31 affected valves (74%) after a median of 11 months (range 4.5-157.5). Eleven patients had at least one follow-up echocardiogram after resolution of the vegetation and none had recurrent vegetations after warfarin was stopped.This study should serve to provide general recommendations regarding treatment of patients with TIA/stroke with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis. Valvular vegetations resolve in most patients and the risk of recurrent stroke is low. Warfarin can safely be switched to aspirin in most patients when the vegetation resolves or after two years if it does not resolve. Prolonged warfarin may be warranted in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, positive antiphospholipid antibodies, and a persistent vegetation.

[Second look: practical diagnostic and therapeutic checks in neurorehabilitation]

Post-acute inpatient neurorehabilitation facilities are increasingly treating patients who are not only severely ill and multimorbid but who are also referred from non-neurological departments. These patients are still often medically unstable so that the previous diagnostics and treatment must be reevaluated and when necessary adapted or supplemented. Certain interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic problems, such as antithrombotic therapy, regularly reoccur. This article presents these problems in a checklist fashion, which should provide indications in individual cases when previously carried out measures need to be questioned and adapted.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology position statement on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

BACKGROUND

The term Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) refers to a group of drugs that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. Even though their use for treating different thrombotic or prothrombotic conditions is increasing recently, there is no compelling evidence indicating that those medications are safe in all antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients.

METHODOLOGY

To address this issue, specialists from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding DOACs use in APS to answer the three following questions: (1) potential mechanisms of action of these drugs that could be relevant to APS pathogenesis, (2) DOACs interference on lupus anticoagulant testing, and (3) the efficacy of DOACs in APS.

POSITION STATEMENT

After critically reviewing the relevant evidence, the authors formulated 8 Position Statements about DOACs use in APS.

CONCLUSION

DOACs should not be routinely used in APS patients, especially in those with a high-risk profile (triple positivity to aPL, arterial thrombosis, and recurrent thrombotic events). In addition, DOACs interferes with LA testing, leading to false-positive results in patients investigating APS.

Thrombophilia evaluation in pulmonary embolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with pulmonary embolism commonly undergo thrombophilia evaluation for a variety of reasons including risk stratification for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and treatment planning. However, the utility of thrombophilia testing in many clinical scenarios remains unclear. This review evaluates current recommendations for thrombophilia testing described in consensus VTE guidelines, recent literature on the clinical application of these recommendations, novel genetic assessments for hereditary thrombophilias, and studies evaluating use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in VTE patients with thrombophilias.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current VTE guidelines advise limited use of thrombophilia testing, recognizing that testing may be misinterpreted and frequently does not lead to a change in management. Testing and test results are not necessarily benign, are frequently misinterpreted, and can lead to increased anxiety in both patients and clinicians. Recent studies have offered innovative techniques to better align clinical practice with these recommendations as well as expanded genomic assessments to improve the scope and predictive value of thrombophilia testing. There is also emerging literature on the appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for VTE patients with hereditary thrombophilias or antiphospholipid syndrome.

SUMMARY

Thrombophilia testing in its current form does not significantly impact clinical management or improve outcomes for most VTE patients. Therefore, it should be employed judiciously and only in patients for whom it is likely to alter clinical management. Novel expanded genomic thrombophilia testing approaches and additional studies evaluating optimal anticoagulant treatment in various thrombophilia subpopulations will make thrombophilia testing more useful for patients moving forward.

What is the appropriate anticoagulation strategy for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome?

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune prothrombotic disorder mediated by a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies collectively known as antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). They include lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies. It has been shown that those patients with all three aPL (triple positive) are at highest risk of both a first thrombotic event and of a recurrence, despite anticoagulation. In response to publication of a meta-analysis and a randomised controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in triple-positive APS with venous and/or arterial thrombosis, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued recommendations that direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOACs) should not be used for secondary prevention of thrombosis in all APS patients (although they did draw specific attention to the high risk of triple-positive patients). As there is less evidence for patients with single- or dual-positive patients with APS, this may be an over-interpretation of the data. In this review, we explore the available evidence on safety and efficacy of DOACs in thrombotic APS, the problem of detecting LA while on DOAC, and provide some practical guidance for managing this problem.

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: refining the value of "non-criteria" antibodies for diagnosis and clinical management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and venous thrombotic manifestations and/or pregnancy-related complications in patients with persistently high antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), the most common being represented by anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-beta 2 glycoprotein-I (aβ2GPI), and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). A growing number of studies have showed that, in some cases, patients may present with clinical features of APS but with temporary positive or persistently negative titers of aPL. For these patients, the definition of seronegative APS (SN-APS) has been proposed. Nevertheless, the negativity to classic aPL criteria does not imply that other antibodies may be present or involved in the onset of thrombosis. The diagnosis of SN-APS is usually made by exclusion, but its recognition is important to adopt the most appropriate anti-thrombotic strategy to reduce the rate of recurrences. This research is in continuous development as the clinical relevance of these antibodies is far from being completely clarified. The most studied antibodies are those against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, vimentin/cardiolipin complex, and annexin A5. Moreover, the assays to measure the levels of these antibodies have not yet been standardized. In this review, we will summarize the evidence on the most studied non-criteria aPL, their potential clinical relevance, and the antithrombotic therapeutic strategies available in the setting of APS and SN-APS.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a cohort study

Objectives

Despite controversies, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We investigated the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in real-life consecutive APS patients.

Patients and methods

In a cohort study of 176 APS patients, which included 82 subjects who preferred DOACs or had unstable anticoagulation with VKAs, we recorded venous thromboembolism (VTE), cerebrovascular ischemic events or myocardial infarction, along with major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB).

Results

APS patients were followed for a median time of 51 (interquartile range 43–63) months. Patients on DOACs and those on VKAs were similar with regard to baseline characteristics. APS patients treated with DOACs had increased risk of recurrent thromboembolic events and recurrent VTE alone compared with those on VKAs (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54–10.28, p = 0.004 and HR = 3.69, 95% CI: 1.27–10.68, p = 0.016, respectively) with no differences between rivaroxaban and apixaban or single- or double-positive and triple-positive APS. Thromboembolism on DOACs was associated with older age (median 52 versus 42 years, p = 0.008) and higher global APS score (median 13 versus 8.5, p = 0.013). Patients on DOACs had increased risk of major bleeding or CRNMB (HR = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.53–8.63, p = 0.003), but rates of gastrointestinal bleeds (HR = 3.36, 95% CI: 0.70–16.16, p = 0.13) and major bleeds or CRNMB other than heavy menstrual bleeding (HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 0.62–9.69, p = 0.2) were similar in both treatment groups.

Conclusion

During long-term follow-up of real-life APS patients, DOACs are less effective and less safe as VKAs in the prevention of thromboembolism.

Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Objectives

This study aims to review the studies evaluating the therapeutic effects of rivaroxaban versus those of warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Materials and methods

The study included randomized clinical trials, comparative studies, cross-sectional investigations, and case series that focused on the effects of warfarin and rivaroxaban and compared the effects of these anticoagulants in patients with APS. The relevant articles published until 2018 were searched in several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science.

Results

The findings of the reviewed studies showed that rivaroxaban can be used as an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in APS patients. However, the effectiveness of rivaroxaban in the prevention of thrombosis in high-risk APS patients is suspected.

Conclusion

Given the high risk of using rivaroxaban in thrombotic APS patients with labile international normalized ratio (INR) or poor adherence to INR monitoring, it is not suggested to use this agent for these patients.

Oral Anticoagulant Therapy-When Art Meets Science

Anticoagulant treatment is extremely important and frequently encountered in the therapy of various cardiovascular diseases. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are in use for the prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism, despite the introduction of new direct-acting oral anticoagulants (NOAC). The VKA still have the clear recommendation in patients with a mechanical prosthetic heart valve replacement or moderate to severe mitral stenosis of the rheumatic origin, in deep vein thrombosis associated with congenital thrombophilia, and in cases where NOAC are prohibited by social condition (financial reason) or by comorbidities (extreme weight, severe renal or liver disease). VKA dosing required to reach the targeted therapeutic range varies largely between patients (inter-individual variability). This inter-individual variability depends on multiple environmental factors such as age, mass, diet, etc. but it is also influenced by genetic determinism. About 30 genes implicated in the metabolism coumarins derivatives were identified, the most important being CYP2C9 and VKORC, each with several polymorphisms. Herein, we review the data regarding genetic alterations in general and specific populations, highlight the diagnosis options in particular cases presenting with genetic alteration causing higher sensitivity and/or resistance to VKA therapy and underline the utility of NOAC in solving such rare and difficult problems.

Clinical and laboratory practice for lupus anticoagulant testing: An International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee survey

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines have contributed to more uniformity in the performance and interpretation of lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. However, points to reconsider include testing for LA in patients on anticoagulation, cut-off values, and interpretation of results.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization committee (ISTH SSC) questionnaire was to capture the spectrum of clinical and laboratory practice in LA detection, focusing on variability in practice, so that the responses could inform further ISTH SSC recommendations.

METHODS

Members of the ISTH SSC on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies and participants of the Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies Programme of the External quality Control of diagnostic Assays and Tests Foundation were invited to complete a questionnaire on LA testing that was placed on the ISTH website using RedCap, with data tallied using simple descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

There was good agreement on several key recommendations in the ISTH and other guidelines on LA testing, such as sample processing, principles of testing, choice of tests, repeat testing to confirm persistent positivity and the use of interpretative reporting. However, the results highlight that there is less agreement on some other aspects, including the timing of testing in relation to thrombosis or pregnancy, testing in patients on anticoagulation, cut-off values, and calculation and interpretation of results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some of the variability in practice in LA testing reflects the lack of substantive data to underpin evidence-based recommendations, a more uniform approach, based on further guidance, should reduce the inter-center variability of LA testing.

Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Recurrent Strokes in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease: JACC Scientific Expert Panel

Stroke survivors carry a high risk of recurrence. Antithrombotic medications are paramount for secondary prevention and thus crucial to reduce the overall stroke burden. Appropriate antithrombotic agent selection should be based on the best understanding of the physiopathological mechanism that led to the initial ischemic injury. Antiplatelet therapy is preferred for lesions characterized by atherosclerosis and endothelial injury, whereas anticoagulant agents are favored for cardiogenic embolism and highly thrombophilic conditions. Large randomized controlled trials have provided new data to support recommendations for the evidence-based use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant agents after stroke. In this review, the authors cover recent trials that have altered clinical practice, cite systematic reviews and meta-analyses, review evidence-based recommendations based on older landmark trials, and indicate where there are still evidence-gaps and new trials being conducted.

Treatment in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: a review

Antiphospholipid syndrome an autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity alongside the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). This review evaluates primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with aPL and thrombotic events. In primary thromboprophylaxis a risk-stratified approach is needed based on aPL, comorbidity with other autoimmune conditions and cardiovascular vascular risk factors. In primary thromboprophylaxis, the efficacy of low-dose aspirin is debatable and requires better-designed controlled studies. So far warfarin has not been shown to improve venous and/or arterial thrombosis incidence in aPL carriers and instead increased safety concerns. The benefit of hydroxychloroquine is inconclusive despite promising data, requiring large, controlled trials. For secondary thromboprophylaxis warfarin seems to be the best option with potential in renal transplant recipients and better efficacy at high intensity, although maintenance of target international normalized ratio needs careful monitoring. Aspirin has not shown to be beneficial, and data on rivaroxaban are limited and contradictory. Despite all data being informative, there are limitations that need to be addressed with robust clinical trials.

A Coronary Conundrum: Papillary Muscle Rupture and Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Secondary to Coronary Thromboembolism in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder that has a strong propensity for a hypercoagulable state and is known to be associated with venous and arterial thromboembolism. We describe an uncommon case of APS in the setting of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with thromboembolism, and a rare complication after an uncommon etiology of myocardial infarction. This case highlights the importance of early and appropriate type of anticoagulation to reduce the morbidity and mortality in patients with APS.

New versus Old Oral Anticoagulants: How Can We Set the Scale Needle? Considerations on a Case Report

Ischemic stroke is a complex multifactorial disorder. Anticoagulation is a growing research area, with the main goal of preventing systemic embolization and stroke. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman with antiphospholipid syndrome who was unsuccessfully treated with Dabigatran, a new oral anticoagulant, as she developed a major stroke involving the right carotid artery, due to deep venous thrombosis with pulmonary embolism. We therefore suggest a closer monitoring of the safety and efficacy of dabigatran. Moreover, in the presence of multifactorial causes of pro-coagulation, we believe that warfarin should remain the mainstay of oral anticoagulation.

Therapeutic response to glucocorticoids, anticoagulation and plasma exchange in a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome presenting with purpura fulminans

We report the case of a 25-year-old female patient who presented with purpura fulminans as a manifestation of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Purpura fulminans is considered a rare cutaneous manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome. Most frequently, it occurs in the context of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, either due to loss of affected extremities or thromboembolic damage to internal organs. After insufficient efficacy of parenteral anticoagulation and oral glucocorticosteroid treatment, we escalated treatment to high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroid and five consecutive sessions of plasma exchange with good and sustained clinical response. At follow-up six months after admission, skin manifestations had healed with scarring, and no additional thrombotic events had occurred. Plasma exchange may hold promise as a therapeutic option in refractory or severe cases of antiphospholipid syndrome-related purpura fulminans with extensive cutaneous necrosis, although evidence is limited.

Resolution of large aortic valve vegetations in antiphospholipid syndrome treated with therapeutic anticoagulation: a report of two cases and literature review

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis in antiphospholipid syndrome presents a management dilemma. Large mobile valvular lesions pose an increased risk of stroke and arterial embolization. However, surgical excision or valve replacement in such patients carries high morbidity and mortality, while anticoagulation alone has limited data. We describe two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome presenting with neurologic events and large non-bacterial aortic valve vegetations. Both patients were successfully managed with anticoagulation and demonstrated rapid dissolution of lesions without evidence of recurrent embolic events. We provide a literature review describing additional cases managed with anticoagulation with dissolution of valvular lesions over time. Our cases further support the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis in the context of arterial embolization.