Evaluation of functional assays for the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia using 5B9, a monoclonal IgG that mimics human antibodies

Limited concordance of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody assays for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an analysis of the TORADI-HIT study

BACKGROUND

Anecdotal reports suggest that the correlation between heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody assays for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation between widely used assays and examine possible factors contributing to variability.

METHODS

This is a large, prospective cohort study with 10 participating tertiary care hospitals including 1393 patients with suspected HIT in clinical practice. HIT was defined by a positive heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) assay (washed platelet reference standard test). Three different immunoassays were used to measure heparin/PF4 antibodies: chemiluminescent immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and particle gel immunoassay. Various factors that could influence the assays were examined: sex (male or female), age (<65 years or ≥65 years), unfractionated heparin exposure, presence of thrombosis, cardiovascular surgery, and intensive care unit. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated. Z-scores and diagnostic odds ratios were determined in the aforementioned subgroups of patients.

RESULTS

Among 1393 patients, 119 were classified as HIT-positive (prevalence, 8.5%). The median 4Ts score was 5 (IQR, 4-6) in patients with HIT compared with 3 (IQR, 2-4) in patients without HIT. Correlations (rs) between immunoassays were weak (0.53-0.65). Inconsistencies between immunoassays could not be explained by further analyses of z-scored test results and diagnostic odds ratios in subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between widely used heparin/PF4 antibody assays was weak, and key factors could not explain this variability. Standardization of immunoassays is requested to improve comparability.

A machine-learning model for reducing misdiagnosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A prospective, multicenter, observational study

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) at the bedside remains challenging, exposing a significant number of patients at risk of delayed diagnosis or overtreatment. We hypothesized that machine-learning algorithms could be utilized to develop a more accurate and user-friendly diagnostic tool that integrates diverse clinical and laboratory information and accounts for complex interactions.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study including 1393 patients with suspected HIT between 2018 and 2021 from 10 study centers. Detailed clinical information and laboratory data were collected, and various immunoassays were conducted. The washed platelet heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) served as the reference standard.

FINDINGS

HIPA diagnosed HIT in 119 patients (prevalence 8.5%). The feature selection process in the training dataset (75% of patients) yielded the following predictor variables: (1) immunoassay test result, (2) platelet nadir, (3) unfractionated heparin use, (4) CRP, (5) timing of thrombocytopenia, and (6) other causes of thrombocytopenia. The best performing models were a support vector machine in case of the chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and the ELISA, as well as a gradient boosting machine in particle-gel immunoassay (PaGIA). In the validation dataset (25% of patients), the AUROC of all models was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.00). Compared to the currently recommended diagnostic algorithm (4Ts score, immunoassay), the numbers of false-negative patients were reduced from 12 to 6 (-50.0%; ELISA), 9 to 3 (-66.7%, PaGIA) and 14 to 5 (-64.3%; CLIA). The numbers of false-positive individuals were reduced from 87 to 61 (-29.8%; ELISA), 200 to 63 (-68.5%; PaGIA) and increased from 50 to 63 (+29.0%) for the CLIA.

INTERPRETATION

Our user-friendly machine-learning algorithm for the diagnosis of HIT (https://toradi-hit.org) was substantially more accurate than the currently recommended diagnostic algorithm. It has the potential to reduce delayed diagnosis and overtreatment in clinical practice. Future studies shall validate this model in wider settings.

FUNDING

Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH).

Indeterminate serotonin release assays are associated with a high mortality rate

Background

The serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Although the SRA holds high sensitivity and specificity when results are definitive, up to 10% of samples from patients with suspected HIT yield "indeterminate" results.

Objectives

We aimed to study the clinical course of patients with indeterminate results.

Methods

We conducted a cohort analysis of 2056 patients that underwent SRA testing.

Results

Of 2056 total patients, 152 (7.4%) had indeterminate assays. The prevalence of thrombocytopenia <50,000 × 106 was higher in patients with an indeterminate or positive SRA, compared with a negative SRA (39.5% and 40.0% vs. 27.5%, p < 4.0 × 10-4). Patients with an indeterminate SRA were more likely to have been treated in the intensive care unit than patients with a positive SRA (93.3% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.03). The mean thrombocytopenia, timing of platelet count fall, thrombosis or other sequelae, and other causes for thrombocytopenia score in patients with indeterminate SRA was 2.9, corresponding to a HIT probability of <5%. Of 152 patients, 128 (78.9%) had heparin-PF4 optical densities (ODs) below 0.60 OD, whereas four patients (2.6%) had ODs above 2.00 OD. Inpatient mortality was significant in patients with indeterminate SRAs compared with positive or negative SRA (49.3% vs. 21.1% and 27.2%, p < 2.4 × 10-10).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that an indeterminate SRA may signal an in vivo platelet activation process that is not related to heparin but is associated with increased mortality.

Anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G levels in vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: Persistent positivity through 7 months

Background

Anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that activate platelets via FcγRIIA drive the pathophysiology of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). Evolution of these antibodies and their ability to activate platelets after initial treatment remains unknown.

Objectives

To assess how clinical and platelet parameters, anti-PF4 antibody levels, and patient serum reactivity changes during follow-up after VITT presentation.

Methods

We describe cases of seven discharged VITT patients that were followed from diagnosis up to 280 days (range 199-280) after vaccination. We measured anti-PF4 antibodies and PF4 levels in patient serum during follow-up and tested the ability of patient serum to activate healthy donor platelets and patient platelets over time.

Results

Anti-PF4 immunoglobulin G antibody levels are very high at diagnosis (0.9-2.6 OD) and remain relatively high (>1.0 OD) in all patients, except one treated with rituximab, at 7 months post vaccination. All patients were on direct oral anticoagulants throughout follow-up and no patients had recurrent thrombosis. Patients' platelets during follow-up have normal FcγRIIA levels and responsiveness to platelet agonists. Patient diagnostic serum strongly activated control platelets, either alone or with PF4. Most follow-up serum alone was weaker at stimulating donor and patient platelets. However, follow-up serum beyond 150 days still strongly activated platelets with PF4 addition in three patients. Patient serum PF4 levels were lower than controls at diagnosis but returned within normal range by day 50.

Conclusions

Explanations for reduced platelet activation during follow-up, despite similar total anti-PF4 antibody levels, remains unclear. Clinical implications of persistent anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT require further study.

Multicentre evaluation of 5B9, a monoclonal anti-PF4/heparin IgG mimicking human HIT antibodies, as an internal quality control in HIT functional assays: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Immunology

BACKGROUND

Functional tests for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) exhibit variable performance.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated in a multicenter study whether 5B9, a monoclonal anti-PF4/heparin IgG mimicking human HIT antibodies, could be used as an internal quality control.

METHODS

5B9 was sent to 11 laboratories in seven countries, and six initial concentrations ranging from 10 to 400 μg/mL were tested by heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA), serotonin release assay (SRA), platelet aggregation test (PAT), flow cytometry (FC), or heparin-induced multiple-electrode aggregometry (HIMEA). Each method was evaluated in three different laboratories using experimental procedures identical to those usually applied for the diagnosis of HIT by testing platelets from 10 different healthy donors.

RESULTS

The procedures used varied among the laboratories, particularly when platelet-rich plasma and whole blood were used. Nevertheless, positive results were obtained with at least 100 μg/ml of 5B9 for most donors tested by all centers (except one) performing HIPA, SRA, or HIMEA. FC and PAT results were more heterogeneous. FC results from one center that used washed platelets preincubated with PF4 were positive with all donors at 50 µg/ml 5B9, but at least 200 μg/ml of 5B9 were required to activate cells with most donors tested using PAT.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that HIT functional tests are not well standardized and exhibit variable sensitivity for the detection of platelet-activating antibodies. However, 5B9 is a potentially useful tool to standardize functional tests, to select responding platelet donors, and consequently to improve the performance of these assays and comparability between laboratories.

COVID-19 patients often show high-titer non-platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe adverse reaction to heparin caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. Heparin is a cornerstone of treatment in critically ill COVID-19 patients. HIT antibodies can be detected by antigen tests and functional tests. Often strong reactivity in the antigen test is used as a surrogate marker for the presence of clinically relevant, platelet-activating antibodies. We observed an unexpectedly high percentage of COVID-19 patients, clinically suspected to have HIT, with high titer anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, but a negative functional test.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether in COVID-19 patients a serum-derived factor inhibits the heparin-induced platelet activation test (HIPA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve COVID-19 patients with suspected HIT were tested. Three samples tested negative in all assays; nine samples tested positive by antigen tests, among which only three tested also positive by HIPA. When we spiked COVID-19 serum or control serum with the human HIT antibody like monoclonal antibody 5B9, reactivity of 5B9 remained the same. Also, the purified IgG fractions of COVID-19 sera testing strongly positive in the PF4/heparin antigen test but negative in the functional test did not show increased reactivity in the functional test in comparison to the original serum. Both results make a functionally inhibitory factor in the serum/plasma of COVID-19 patients highly unlikely.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 patients often present with strong reactivity in PF4/heparin antigen tests without the presence of platelet-activating antibodies. Diagnosis of HIT requires confirmation of heparin-dependent, platelets activating antibodies to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment with non-heparin anticoagulants.

Accuracy of the functional, flow cytometer-based Emo-Test HIT Confirm® for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Rapid functional assays have been proposed to overcome the limitations of washed platelet assays in the work-up of patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Data on the diagnostic accuracy are, however, scarce and conflicting. We aimed to study the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid, flow cytometer-based assay and to explore sources of variability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Frozen serum samples of 103 consecutive patients, evaluated for suspected HIT at our institution in 2017, and characterized with 4Ts score, IgG-PF4/heparin ELISA (GTI), HemosIL®Acustar (IgG), as well as heparin-induced platelet activation test (HIPA), were further tested using HIT Confirm, determining P-selectin release of donor platelets after incubation with patient's serum. The diagnosis of HIT was defined as a positive HIPA result.

RESULTS

HIT was confirmed in 15 out of 103 patients corresponding to a prevalence of 14.6%. HIT Confirm was positive in 11 patients (10.7%), negative in 88 patients (85.4%), and inconclusive in 4 patients (3.9%). According to the intention-to-diagnose principle, the number of true positives was 9, the number of true negatives 83, the number of false negatives was 6, the number of false positives 5. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 60.0%, and a specificity of 94.3%. Modifications of the test did not improve sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid, flow cytometer-based assay HIT Confirm is able to verify HIT in positive patient samples but cannot rule-out HIT in clinical practice. Other rapid functional assays shall be studies in appropriately designed diagnostic accuracy studies.

An Optimized and Standardized Rapid Flow Cytometry Functional Method for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a thrombocytopenia caused by heparin and mediated by an atypical immune mechanism leading to a paradoxical high thrombotic risk, associated with severe morbidity or death. The diagnosis of HIT combines a clinical scoring of pretest probability and laboratory testing. First-line routine tests are antigen binding assays detecting specific antibodies. The most sensitive of these tests have a high HIT-negative predictive value enabling HIT diagnosis to be ruled out when negative. However, HIT-positive predictive value is low, and a functional assay evaluating the pathogenicity of the antibodies should be performed to exclude false-positive results. In contrast to screening assays, functional assays are highly specific but technically challenging, and are thus performed in referral laboratories, where platelet activation is detected using radioactive serotonin (serotonin release assay, SRA) or visually (heparin-induced platelet activation, HIPA). Flow cytometry is a possible alternative. It is, however, currently not widely used, mostly because of the lack of standardization of the published assays. This article describes and discusses the standardization of a HIT flow cytometry assay (HIT-FCA) method, which subsequently led to the development and commercialization of a CE-marked assay (HIT Confirm^®, Emosis, France) as a suitable rapid HIT functional test.

Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia

Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a life-threatening clinical syndrome that is under-recognized and difficult to diagnose. Many drugs can cause immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, but the most commonly implicated are abciximab, carbamazepine, ceftriaxone, eptifibatide, heparin, ibuprofen, mirtazapine, oxaliplatin, penicillin, quinine, quinidine, rifampicin, suramin, tirofiban, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Several different mechanisms have been identified in typical DITP, which is most commonly characterized by severe thrombocytopenia due to clearance and/or destruction of platelets sensitized by a drug-dependent antibody. Patients with typical DITP usually bleed when symptomatic, and biological confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult because detection of drug-dependent antibodies (DDabs) in the patient's serum or plasma is frequently not possible. This is in contrast to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a particular DITP caused in most cases by heparin-dependent antibodies specific for platelet factor 4, which can strongly activate platelets in vitro and in vivo, explaining why affected patients usually have thrombotic complications but do not bleed. In addition, laboratory tests are readily available to diagnose HIT, unlike the methods used to detect DDabs associated with other DITP that are mostly reserved for laboratories specialized in platelet immunology.

Detection of Platelet-Activating Antibodies Associated with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic immune drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that in most instances recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Platelet activation assays (i.e., functional assays) are more specific than immunoassays, since they are able to discern clinically relevant heparin-induced antibodies. All functional assays used for HIT diagnosis share the same principle, as they assess the ability of serum/plasma from suspected HIT patients to activate fresh platelets from healthy donors in the presence of several concentrations of heparin. Depending on the assay, donors’ platelets are stimulated either in whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or in a buffer medium (washed platelets, WP). In addition, the activation endpoint studied varies from one assay to another: platelet aggregation, membrane expression of markers of platelet activation, release of platelet granules. Tests with WP are more sensitive and serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered to be the current gold standard, but functional assays suffer from certain limitations regarding their sensitivity, specificity, complexity, and/or accessibility. However, the strict adherence to adequate preanalytical conditions, the use of selected platelet donors and the inclusion of positive and negative controls in each run are key points that ensure their performances.