Thrombotic and bleeding risk of angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with and without malignancy

Assessing hemorrhagic risks in combination therapy: implications of angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the hemorrhage risk in solid tumor patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and their combination using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods

Data from Q1 2011 to Q4 2023 were extracted from the FAERS database for solid tumor patients treated with AGIs, ICIs, or their combination. A disproportionality analysis was conducted by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), as well as the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), to identify potential safety signals. To assess whether the hemorrhage risk is higher with combination therapy compared to monotherapy, additive and multiplicative models were employed to evaluate the interactions between combination and single-agent treatments.

Results

The combination of AGIs and ICIs significantly increased the risk of hemorrhagic adverse events, particularly tumor and pulmonary hemorrhage. Hemorrhagic events were common in females (50.97%) and older patients (aged 64+), frequently occurring within the first 30 days of treatment (38.11%). Gingival hemorrhage (ROR 3, PRR 418.9) and tumor hemorrhage (ROR 9.65, PRR 1893.36) were most common in the AGI group, while tumor hemorrhage (ROR 9.49, PRR 1350.78) and pulmonary hemorrhage (ROR 2.6, PRR 98.97) were prominent in the ICI group. In the combination group, esophageal variceal hemorrhage (ROR 40.72, PRR 2344.72) and tumor hemorrhage (ROR 19.31, PRR 1056.63) exhibited significantly increased risks Additive and multiplicative models indicated that the excess risk (RDAB = 0.01025, P<0.001) and relative risk (RRAB = 1.99277, P<0.001) of combination therapy were significantly higher than those of monotherapy, suggesting a positive interaction between the drugs that further increases the risk of hemorrhage.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the combination of AGIs and ICIs significantly raises the risk of hemorrhage, underscoring the urgent need for enhanced monitoring protocols in clinical practice to improve treatment efficacy and safety.

Pazopanib in treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-related epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a bleeding disorder characterized by arteriovenous malformations, commonly presenting with epistaxis and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Bleeding symptoms may be difficult to manage and may become life-threatening, with many patients developing dependence on parenteral iron and/or blood transfusion. There is a growing body of evidence that antiangiogenic therapies may be effective in management of bleeding symptoms, presumably targeting pathogenic HHT pathways such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

OBJECTIVES

To report single-center, retrospective real-world use of pazopanib, an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, in 6 patients with HHT-associated epistaxis and/or GI bleeding.

METHODS

A retrospective observational analysis was performed to assess the safety/efficacy of pazopanib use in patients with confirmed HHT-associated epistaxis and/or GI bleeding between January 1, 2019, and June 14, 2023. The Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis institutional electronic medical record was queried for HHT patients who were treated with pazopanib for ≥3 months. Patient data were obtained from patient documentation, physician/nursing notes, and on-call documentation. Institutional review board approval was obtained for data pull as an exempt study.

RESULTS

Our observations on the real-world use of pazopanib in 6 HHT patients with moderate-to-severe bleeding showed improvement in hemoglobin levels, with reduction in iron infusions and red blood cell transfusion requirement.

CONCLUSION

Pazopanib may be a reasonable option for patients with HHT with epistaxis or gastrointestinal bleeding that are refractory to standard treatment.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Types, and Clinical Outcomes

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with unique biological characteristics and complications, including thromboembolism. This systematic review evaluates the incidence, types, and clinical outcomes of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in NEN patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted to identify studies on TEs in NENs. Eligible studies included case reports, case series, and retrospective cohort studies reporting VTEs, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and visceral vein thrombosis (VVT). Data were extracted on tumor site, functionality, differentiation grade, and VTE type. Results: In total, 33 studies were included, comprising 26 case reports, 2 case series, and 5 retrospective cohort studies. VTE prevalence ranged from 7.5% to 33% across studies. The most common VTEs were DVT, PE, and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). A meta-analysis revealed a pooled VTE prevalence of 11.1% (95% CI: 9.07-13.53%). Pancreatic NENs exhibited the highest thrombotic burden, particularly in poorly differentiated and advanced-stage tumors. Functioning tumors, including glucagonomas and ACTH-secreting NENs, were strongly associated with VTEs, potentially related to their systemic effects on coagulation and inflammation. Conclusions: Venous thromboembolism is a significant complication in NEN patients, especially in advanced or poorly differentiated tumors. Early detection and targeted management are critical for improving outcomes. Further investigations are required to clarify the mechanisms underlying thromboembolism in NENs and to develop optimized prophylactic and therapeutic strategies tailored to this patient population.

Risk assessment and prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with solid malignancies

Venous thromboembolism remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among ambulatory cancer patients, necessitating effective risk assessment and prevention strategies. Despite the availability of risk assessment models and guidelines recommending primary thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparins or direct oral anticoagulants, the application of these strategies is inconsistent. This review provides an overview of the current state-of-the-art venous thromboembolism risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer, focusing on existing risk assessment models and the latest guideline recommendations. Finally, it summarizes gaps in knowledge, discusses future directions, and highlights recent advances and state-of-the-art research presented at the 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in Bangkok, Thailand.

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab for gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Based on the comparison of ramucirumab monoclonal antibody with control treatments in randomized controlled trials, this study aims to elucidate the role of ramucirumab monoclonal antibody in cancer therapy and its potential side effects, providing scientific evidence for clinical treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched systematically to obtain the trials on ramucirumab in the treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma up to April 13, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapy agents as interventions for treating gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

After screening 2200 studies, we finally included 8 eligible studies (involving a total of 3,283 participants). Meta-analysis results showed that compared to the control group, ramucirumab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.67, 0.89]) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.40, 0.58]). Similar results were obtained for ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel. In the treatment combining ramucirumab with paclitaxel, compared to monotherapy, three severe adverse reactions (grade ≥ 3) were observed with significantly increased risks (OR > 2). These include proteinuria (OR = 5.37, 95% CI [1.22, 23.54]), hypertension (OR = 4.02, 95% CI [2.63, 6.14]), and gastrointestinal perforation (OR = 4.64, 95% CI [1.00, 21.60]). Subgroup analysis further indicated that ramucirumab is effective in both non-East Asian and East Asian populations, with East Asian patients more prone to developing proteinuria, while having a lower incidence of hypertension. Additionally, ramucirumab demonstrated comparable efficacy between first-line and second-line treatments, with a higher incidence of proteinuria observed in second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab significantly improves the prognosis of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. When used in combination with paclitaxel, close monitoring of adverse reactions such as proteinuria (especially in East Asian populations), hypertension (especially in non-East Asian populations), and gastrointestinal perforation is essential.

Novel Cancer Therapeutics: Perioperative Implications and Challenges

Since the introduction of immunotherapy and targeted therapies, patients not only have adequate tumoral response to these treatments, but their quality of life has improved due to milder toxicities. However, due to their wide mechanisms of action, the toxicity profile for these therapies is broad, can have an insidious onset, and their recognition can be challenging. Rarely, some of these toxicities can cause significant morbidity if not diagnosed early and lead to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Anesthesiologists are likely to encounter not only a wide spectrum of these toxicities but also a wide range of severity. In some cases, they could be the first to make the diagnosis and therefore need to be prepared to rapidly assess, establish differentials, perform a diagnostic workup, and evaluate the impact the toxicity could have on the patients' care during the perioperative period. In this article, we set to review toxicities of novel cancer therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, that could present in the perioperative setting. This article will help as a guide for anesthesiologists to recognize their clinical presentation, the approach to their diagnosis, and their impact on patient care.

How I treat bleeding in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

ABSTRACT

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT; Osler-Weber-Rendu disease) affects 1 in 5000 persons, making it the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide. Telangiectatic bleeding, primarily causing recurrent epistaxis and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, is the most common and most important manifestation of this multisystem vascular disorder. HHT-associated bleeding results in substantial psychosocial morbidity and iron deficiency anemia that may be severe. Although there remain no regulatory agency-approved therapies for HHT, multiple large studies, including randomized controlled trials, have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of antifibrinolytics for mild-to-moderate bleeding manifestations and systemic antiangiogenic drugs including pomalidomide and bevacizumab for moderate-to-severe bleeding. This has led to a recent paradigm shift away from repetitive temporizing procedural management toward effective systemic medical therapeutics to treat bleeding in HHT. In this article, 4 patient cases are used to illustrate the most common and most challenging presentations of HHT-associated bleeding that hematologists are likely to encounter in daily practice. Built on a framework of published data and supported by extensive clinical experience, guidance is given for modern evidence-based approaches to antifibrinolytic therapy, antiangiogenic therapy, and iron deficiency anemia management across the HHT disease severity spectrum.

Progression of portal hypertension after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma-report a case and literature review

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination therapy became the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Gastroesophageal varices should be monitored and managed before treatment. The progression of portal hypertension during bevacizumab-containing therapy is unclear.

METHOD

A case of new development of esophageal varices, ascites, and hepatic hydrothorax during atezolizumab/bevacizumab therapy at National Taiwan University Hospital was reported, and relevant literature was reviewed.

RESULTS

We presented an 83-year-old male with resolved hepatitis B without cirrhosis. He had BCLC stage C HCC and received tri-weekly atezolizumab/bevacizumab therapy for 34 cycles with sustained partial response. Progressive ascites, esophageal varices, and hepatic hydrothorax developed, though his portal vein was patent and the tumor was under control. Five similar cases of HCC (BCLC B/C: n = 3/2) had been reported previously. Among them, three had cirrhosis with pre-existing small esophageal varices before treatment. After the administration of 1-15 cycles of atezolizumab/bevacizumab therapy, one patient had a progression of varices, and the other four developed variceal bleeding. The association between atezolizumab/bevacizumab and portal hypertension was possible, which might relate to the VEGF pathway and immune-related adverse events with progressive hepatic fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment might exacerbate portal hypertension. Careful monitoring and management should be considered during treatment.

Wound-Healing Effects of Common Antineoplastic Agents and Perioperative Considerations for the Orthopaedic Surgeon

In oncologic patients, optimal postoperative wound healing is crucial for the maintenance of systemic therapies and improved survival. Although several risk factors for postoperative wound complications have been identified, the clinical effect of new antineoplastic agents on wound healing remains uncertain. The available literature on the effect of antineoplastic agents in wound healing is complex to analyze because of other confounding risk factors such as radiation therapy and certain patient-specific variables. Available perioperative drug recommendations are based on database opinion and case reports from adverse event alerts. This review highlights the characteristics of old and new antineoplastic agents commonly used in the treatment of sarcoma, carcinoma, and other cancers and their potential effects on the wound-healing process. It also aims to provide perioperative treatment cessation recommendations to guide orthopaedic surgeons and prevent drug-related wound complications to the fullest extent possible.

Targeted Therapies, Biologics, and Immunotherapy in the Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Settings: Perioperative Risks

Cancer therapeutics has been revolutionized by the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The paradigm of neoadjuvant therapy is commonly employed across multiple solid tumors, exhibiting significant clinical benefit as exemplified with ICIs in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. However, neoadjuvant therapy can be associated with treatment-related adverse events. As the incorporation of these novel therapies in the preoperative space expands, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to understand the potential perioperative implications of these treatments. This article focuses on surgical considerations tied to these treatments, highlighting potential drug-surgery interactions and complications.

Thromboembolic Events Associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although thromboembolic events (TEEs) have been reported with the use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), their association remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to provide a comprehensive review of TEEs associated with EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We collected EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib) adverse reaction reports from 2015 Q1 to 2023 Q1 from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to identify thromboembolic adverse events associated with EGFR-TKIs by comparing them with the overall FAERS database according to the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Associated factors were explored using univariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified 1068 reports of TEEs associated with EGFR-TKIs (1.24% accounts for all TEEs). Affected patients were females (49.72%) and those older than 65 years (41.20%). The reported TEE case fatality was 30.24%. The median time to onset (TTO) of all cases was 39 days [interquartile range (IQR) 11-161], and the median TTO of fatalities [31 days (IQR 10-116)] was significantly shorter than that of non-fatal cases [46 days (IQR 12-186)].

CONCLUSION

This study yielded three key findings. Firstly, EGFR-TKIs seem to exhibit prothrombotic effects, elevating the risk of TEEs. Secondly, the clinical outcomes of TEEs associated with EGFR-TKIs were poor. Thirdly, most TEEs occurred within the initial 3 months, and fatal cases occurred earlier than non-fatal cases.

Exploring the Spectrum of VEGF Inhibitors' Toxicities from Systemic to Intra-Vitreal Usage in Medical Practice

The use of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (VEGFi) has become prevalent in the field of medicine, given the high incidence of various pathological conditions necessitating VEGF inhibition within the general population. These conditions encompass a range of advanced neoplasms, such as colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cancer, ovarian cancer, and others, along with ocular diseases. The utilization of VEGFi is not without potential risks and adverse effects, requiring healthcare providers to be well-prepared for identification and management. VEGFi can be broadly categorized into two groups: antibodies or chimeric proteins that specifically target VEGF (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab) and non-selective and selective small molecules (sunitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, etc.) designed to impede intracellular signaling of the VEGF receptor (RTKi, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The presentation and mechanisms of adverse effects resulting from VEGFi depend primarily on this distinction and the route of drug administration (systemic or intra-vitreal). This review provides a thorough examination of the causes, recognition, management, and preventive strategies for VEGFi toxicities with the goal of offering support to oncologists in both clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.

Antiplatelet and Wound Healing Implications of Immunotherapy and Targeted Cancer Therapies in the Perioperative Period

The traditional paradigm of oncologic treatment centered on cytotoxic chemotherapy has undergone tremendous advancement during the last 15 yr with the advent of immunotherapy and targeted cancer therapies. These agents, including small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, are highly specific to individual tumor characteristics and can prevent cell growth and tumorigenesis by inhibiting specific molecular targets or single oncogenes. While generally better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy, these therapies are associated with unique constellations of adverse effects. Of particular importance in the perioperative and periprocedural settings are hematologic abnormalities, particularly antiplatelet effects with increased risk of bleeding, and implications for wound healing. This narrative review discusses targeted cancer therapies and provides recommendations for physicians managing these patients' care as it relates to procedural or surgical interventions.

Ambulatory cancer patients: who should definitely receive antithrombotic prophylaxis and who should never receive

Up to 15-20% of cancer patients experience one or more episodes of venous thromboembolism during cancer disease. Approximately 80% of all cancer-associated venous thromboembolic events occur in non-hospitalized patients. Routine thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with cancer who start new anticancer treatment is currently not recommended by the international guidelines due to the high heterogeneity of these patients in terms of VTE or bleeding risks, the difficulties in selecting patients at high risk, and the uncertainty of duration of prophylaxis. Although the international guidelines endorsed the Khorana score for estimating the thrombotic risk in ambulatory cancer patients, the discriminatory performance of this score is not completely convincing and varies according to the cancer type. Consequently, a minority of ambulatory patients with cancer receive an accurate screening for primary prophylaxis of VTE. The aim of this review is to provide support to physicians in identifying those ambulatory patients with cancer for whom thromboprophylaxis should be prescribed and those that should not be candidate to thromboprophylaxis. In absence of high bleeding risk, primary thromboprophylaxis should be recommended in patients with pancreatic cancer and, probably, in patients with lung cancer harboring ALK/ROS1 translocations. Patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers are at high risk of VTE, but a careful assessment of bleeding risk should be made before deciding on antithrombotic prophylaxis. Primary prevention of VTE is not recommended in cancer patients at increased risk of bleeding as patients with brain cancer, with moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia or severe renal impairment.

Tissue factor positive microparticles as a biomarker for increased risk of breast cancer-associated thrombosis: a mini review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a frequent complication in cancer patients, resulting in poor prognosis. Breast cancer is not highly thrombogenic but is highly prevalent, resulting in increased VTE cases. Many cancers express tissue factor (TF), a glycoprotein that triggers coagulation. The cancer cells were shown to express and release substantial amounts of TF-positive microparticles (MPTF), associated with a prothrombotic state. This narrative review evaluated the current use of the procoagulant MPTF as a biomarker for thrombosis risk in breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tumors of epithelial origin with elevated TF expression have been associated with increased VTE incidence. Thus, studies have affirmed the use of MPTF biomarkers for VTE risk in many cancers. Patients with metastatic breast cancer and CAT were found to exhibit elevated procoagulant microparticles in vitro, due to TF expression. The silencing of TF was associated with decreased microparticle release in breast carcinoma cell lines, associated with decreased coagulation.

SUMMARY

CAT is a multifactorial condition, with several various underlying diseases. It is proposed that MPTF may be an effective biomarker for thrombosis risk in breast cancer patients but requires a more systemic evaluation utilizing standardized quantification methods.

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis on Bevacizumab: Risk of Recurrence and Bleeding When Bevacizumab Is Stopped or Continued

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication during cancer, with complex management due to an increased risk of both recurrence and bleeding. Bevacizumab is an effective anti-angiogenic treatment but increases the risk of bleeding and potentially the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CAT receiving bevacizumab, according to the continuation or discontinuation of bevacizumab. In a retrospective multicenter study, patients receiving anticoagulant for CAT occurring under bevacizumab therapy were included. The primary endpoint combined recurrent VTE and/or major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Among the 162 patients included, bevacizumab was discontinued in 70 (43.2%) patients and continued in 92 (56.8%) patients. After a median follow-up of 318 days, 21 (30.0%) patients in the discontinuation group experienced VTE recurrence or major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, compared to 27 (29.3%) in the continuation group. The analysis of survival following the first event showed no significant difference between the groups in uni- or multivariate analysis (p = 0.19). The primary endpoint was not influenced by the duration of bevacizumab exposure. These results suggest that the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CAT receiving bevacizumab is not modified regardless of whether bevacizumab is continued or discontinued.

Induced Vascular Normalization-Can One Force Tumors to Surrender to a Better Microenvironment?

Immunotherapy has changed the way many cancers are being treated. Researchers in the field of immunotherapy and tumor immunology are investigating similar questions: How can the positive benefits achieved with immunotherapies be enhanced? Can this be achieved through combinations with other agents and if so, which ones? In our view, there is an urgent need to improve immunotherapy to make further gains in the overall survival for those patients that should benefit from immunotherapy. While numerous different approaches are being considered, our team believes that drug delivery methods along with appropriately selected small-molecule drugs and drug candidates could help reach the goal of doubling the overall survival rate that is seen in some patients that are given immunotherapeutics. This review article is prepared to address how immunotherapies should be combined with a second treatment using an approach that could realize therapeutic gains 10 years from now. For context, an overview of immunotherapy and cancer angiogenesis is provided. The major targets in angiogenesis that have modulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment and immune cells are highlighted. A combination approach that, for us, has the greatest potential for success involves treatments that will normalize the tumor's blood vessel structure and alter the immune microenvironment to support the action of immunotherapeutics. So, this is reviewed as well. Our focus is to provide an insight into some strategies that will engender vascular normalization that may be better than previously described approaches. The potential for drug delivery systems to promote tumor blood vessel normalization is considered.

Screening, characterization and specific binding mechanism of aptamers against human plasminogen Kringle 5

Plasminogen Kringle 5 is one of the most potent cytokines identified to inhibit the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells. Herein, six aptamer candidates that specifically bind to Kringle 5 were generated by the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). After 10 rounds of screening against Kringle 5, a highly enriched ssDNA pool was sequenced and the representative aptamers were subjected to binding assays to evaluate their affinity and specificity. The preferred aptamer KG-4, which demonstrated a low dissociation constant (K_d) of ∼ 432 nM and excellent selectivity for Kringle 5. A conserved "motif" of eight bases located at the stem-loop intersection, common to the aptamer, was further confirmed as the recognition element for binding with Kringle 5. The bulge formed by the motif and depression on the lysine binding site of Kringle 5 were both located at the binding interface, and the "induced fit" between their structures played a central role in the recognition process. Kringle 5 interacts KG-4 primarily through enthalpy-driven van der Waals forces and hydrogen bond. The key nucleotides A34 and C35 at motif on KG-4 and the positively charged amino acids in the loop 1 and loop 4 regions on Kringle 5 play a major role in the interaction. Furthermore, KG-4 dose-dependently reduced the proliferation inhibition of vascular endothelial cells by Kringle 5 and had a blocking effect on the function of Kringle 5 in inhibiting migration and promoting apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells in vitro. This study put a new light on protein-aptamer binding mechanism and may provide insight into the treatment of ischemic diseases by target depletion of Kringle 5.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor-associated thromboembolism: a critical evaluation of the current evidence

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors are an essential treatment modality for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. As the rates of breast cancer continue to rise globally and the indications for CDK 4/6 inhibitors now extend beyond metastatic disease, more patients than ever are receiving these agents. Thrombosis is an emerging clinical concern with this class of agents, particularly venous thromboembolism. Although venous thromboembolism initially emerged as an adverse effect of interest in early trials, more recent studies have demonstrated even higher incidences of thrombosis in real-world clinical practice. In this review, we summarize the evidence to date that has informed the thrombosis risk for these agents both in clinical trials and real-world studies. We review data describing the venous and arterial thromboembolic risks in clinical trials of CDK 4/6 inhibitors as well as the now rather extensive real-world evidence available, including a comparison of risk for each of the 3 agents approved for use in breast cancer: palcociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. As the role of prophylactic anticoagulation continues to remain unknown in women receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors, future efforts directed at carefully investigating the risks and benefits of thromboprophylaxis may lead to improved outcomes in these patients.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Cancer; Balancing between Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: A Narrative Review

Cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with cancer can be caused by concomitant CV risk factors, cancer itself, and anticancer therapy. Since malignancy can dysregulate the hemostatic system, predisposing cancer patients to both thrombosis and hemorrhage, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with cancer who suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a clinical challenge to cardiologists. Apart from PCI and ACS, other structural interventions, such as TAVR, PFO-ASD closure, and LAA occlusion, and non-cardiac diseases, such as PAD and CVAs, may require DAPT. The aim of the present review is to review the current literature on the optimal antiplatelet therapy and duration of DAPT for oncologic patients, in order to reduce both the ischemic and bleeding risk in this high-risk population.

Angiogenesis-related gene signatures reveal the prognosis of cervical cancer based on single cell sequencing and co-expression network analysis

Cervical cancer ranks first in female reproductive tract tumors in terms of morbidity and mortality. Yet the curative effect of patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer remains unsatisfactory. Although antitumor angiogenic drugs have been recommended as the first-line treatment options for cervical cancer, there are no comprehensive prognostic indicators for cervical cancer based on angiogenic signature genes. In this study, we aimed to develop a model to assess the prognosis of cervical cancer based on angiogenesis-related (AG) signature genes, and to provide some reference for the comprehensive treatment of cervical cancer in the clinical setting. First we screened the AG gene set from GeneCard website, and then performed angiogenesis-related scores (AGS) per cell from single cell sequencing dataset GSE168652, followed by performing weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) for cervical cancer patients according to angiogenesis phenotype. Thus, we established a prognostic model based on AGS by taking the intersection of WGCNA angiogenic module gene and differential gene (DEGs) of GSE168652. The GSE44001 was selected as an external validation set, followed by performing ROC curve analysis to assess its accuracy. The results showed that we successfully constructed a prognostic model related to the AG genes. Patients in the high-AGS group in both the train, test and the validation sets had a worse prognosis than those in the low-AGS group, had lower expression of most immune checkpoint-associated genes and lower tumor mutational burden as well. Patients in the low-AGS group were more sensitive to AMG.706, Bosutinib, and Lenalidomide while Imatinib, Pazopanib, and Sorafenib were more recommended to patients in the high-AGS group. Finally, TXNDC12 and ZC3H13, which have high hazard ratio and poor prognosis in the model, were highly expressed in cervical cancer cell lines and tissue. Meanwhile, the results showed that TXNDC12 promoted the migration of cervical cancer cells and the tubule-forming ability of endothelial cells. In conclusion, our model based on genes with AG features can effectively assess the prognosis of cervical cancer, and can also provide reference for clinicians to choose immune-related treatments.

Ultrasonic hemodynamic changes of superficial temporal artery graft in different angiogenesis outcomes of Moyamoya disease patients treated with combined revascularization surgery

Objective

Combined bypass is commonly used in adult Moyamoya disease (MMD) for revascularization purposes. The blood flow from the external carotid artery system supplied by the superficial temporal artery (STA), middle meningeal artery (MMA), and deep temporal artery (DTA) can restore the impaired hemodynamics of the ischemic brain. In this study we attempted to evaluate the hemodynamic changes of the STA graft and predict the angiogenesis outcomes in MMD patients after combined bypass surgery by using quantitative ultrasonography.

Methods

We retrospectively studied Moyamoya patients who were treated by combined bypass between September 2017 and June 2021 in our hospital. We quantitatively measured the STA with ultrasound and recorded the blood flow, diameter, pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) to assess graft development preoperatively and at 1 day, 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. All patients received both pre- and post- operative angiography evaluation. Patients were divided into either well- or poorly-angiogenesis groups according to the transdural collateral formation status on angiography at 6 months after surgery (W group or P group). Patients with matshushima grade A or B were divided into W group. Patients with matshushima grade C were divided into P group, indicating a poor angiogenesis development.

Results

A total of 52 patients with 54 operated hemispheres were enrolled, including 25 men and 27 women with an average age of 39 ± 14.3 years. Compared to preoperative values, the average blood flow of an STA graft at day 1 postoperation increased from 16.06 ± 12.47 to 117.47± 73.77 (mL/min), diameter increased from 1.14 ± 0.33 to 1.81 ± 0.30 (mm), PI dropped from 1.77 ± 0.42 to 0.76 ± 0.37, and RI dropped from 1.77 ± 0.42 to 0.50 ± 0.12. According to the Matsushima grade at 6 months after surgery, 30 hemispheres qualified as W group and 24 hemispheres as P group. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in diameter (p = 0.010) as well as flow (p = 0.017) at 3 months post-surgery. Flow also remained significantly different at 6 months after surgery (p = 0.014). Based on GEE logistic regression evaluation, the patients with higher levels of flow post-operation were more likely to have poorly-compensated collateral. ROC analysis showed that increased flow of ≥69.5 ml/min (p = 0.003; AUC = 0.74) or a 604% (p = 0.012; AUC = 0.70) increase at 3 months post-surgery compared with the pre-operative value is the cut-off point which had the highest Youden's index for predicting P group. Furthermore, a diameter at 3 months post-surgery that is ≥0.75 mm (p = 0.008; AUC = 0.71) or 52% (p =0.021; AUC = 0.68) wider than pre-operation also indicates a high risk of poor indirect collateral formation.

Conclusions

The hemodynamic of the STA graft changed significantly after combined bypass surgery. An increased flow of more than 69.5 ml/min at 3 months was a good predictive factor for poor neoangiogenesis in MMD patients treated with combined bypass surgery.

Venous and arterial thrombosis associated with abemaciclib therapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is a mainstay of treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates in multiple clinical trials resulted in a black-box warning for this agent. Thrombosis rates in unselected real-world populations receiving abemaciclib remain ill defined.

METHODS

A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving abemaciclib. The primary end point was thrombosis during treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation. Multivariable logistic models assessed predictors of VTE, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model assessed mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 364 patients were included, with a median treatment duration of 5.5 months. Twenty-six patients developed 27 (7.4%) thrombotic events (17 VTE, nine arterial thrombosis, and one with both events). No baseline characteristics were associated with increased VTE risk in multivariable modeling. Patients developing VTE during therapy had a higher risk of death than those who did not (hazard ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.07-4.13). Median survival in patients who developed VTE compared with those who did not was 9.6 vs 25.8 months, respectively. The rate of VTE and any thrombosis during abemaciclib therapy was 9.1 and 13.7 events per 100 person-years, respectively, which is notably higher than rates observed in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, abemaciclib was associated with a VTE rate approximately two-fold greater than the already elevated rates reported in the MONARCH trials. Patients developing thrombosis on abemaciclib had a significantly higher risk of death. Given these findings, studies evaluating the role of thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving abemaciclib are needed.