Switching from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: Does low time in therapeutic range affect persistence?

Transitioning between therapeutic anticoagulants: a clinicians guide to switching patients to or from DOAC therapy

INTRODUCTION

The transition to or from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is common in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and UpToDate up to March 2024 for conditions and approaches for transitioning from one agent to the other. No randomized clinical trials were retrieved except for two studies regarding switching to DOAC in well-conducted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. A narrative review was conducted addressing the conditions for switching from one agent to the other, such as thromboembolic events and major bleeding during anticoagulation, development or worsening of kidney or liver failure, initiation of interfering drugs, adverse events such as allergic reactions, frailty, patients' preferences, and affordability. During transitions from one anticoagulant to the other, the risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications should be minimized. The current approaches for such transitions are derived from those employed in clinical trials evaluating DOAC and from product information.

EXPERT OPINION

Many uncertainties remain regarding those circumstances requiring a change in anticoagulant strategies, as they lack evidence-based guidance. It can be envisaged that the problem of switching to and from DOAC will need additional studies especially addressing the conditions and the best approach to such transitions.

Effect of Previous INR Control during VKA Therapy on Subsequent DOAC Adherence and Persistence, in Patients Switched from VKA to DOAC

INTRODUCTION

 Current guideline suggests a switch from vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with low time in therapeutic range (TTR < 70%). Poor international normalized ratio (INR) control may be the result of poor compliance, and might therefore be associated with subsequent DOAC intake. Therefore, this study evaluates the effect of previous TTR and other measures of INR control on DOAC nonadherence and nonpersistence, in patients who switched from VKA to DOAC.

METHODS

 A total of 437 patients who switched from VKA to DOAC between 2012 and 2019 were included using data from Certe Thrombosis Service, IADB.nl pharmacy community database University Groningen, and Statistics Netherlands. DOAC prescriptions were used to determine nonadherence and nonpersistence. INR control (i.e., TTR, time under therapeutic range [TUR], and INR variability) was assessed during the last 180 days of VKA use. Multivariable regression models were applied to determine the association between INR control and DOAC nonpersistence/nonadherence.

RESULTS

 On VKA, 67.7% of the patients had a TTR below 70%. DOAC nonpersistence was 39.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.4-45.5%) during a median follow-up of 34.4 months (interquartile range: 19.1-49.2). Approximately 80% of persistent patients were DOAC-adherent. Low TTR was not associated with DOAC nonpersistence (hazard ratio: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.69-1.87) and DOAC nonadherence (odds ratio: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.67-2.84), nor were TUR and INR variability.

CONCLUSION

 Previous INR control during VKA therapy is not associated with subsequent DOAC nonadherence and nonpersistence. This study suggests that INR control on VKA cannot, and therefore should not, be used for predicting DOAC adherence or persistence.

Patients on vitamin K treatment: is switching to direct-acting oral anticoagulation cost-effective? A target trial on a prospective cohort

AIMS

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have, to a substantial degree, replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKA) as treatments for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, evidence on the real-world causal effects of switching patients from VKA to DOAC is lacking. We aimed to assess the empirical incremental cost-effectiveness of switching patients to DOAC compared with maintaining VKA treatment.

METHODS

The target trial approach was applied to the prospective observational Swiss-AF cohort, which enrolled 2415 AF patients from 2014 to 2017. Clinical data, healthcare resource utilisation and EQ-5D-based utilities representing quality of life were collected in yearly follow-ups. Health insurance claims were available for 1024 patients (42.4%). Overall survival, quality-of-life, costs from the Swiss statutory health insurance perspective and cost-effectiveness were estimated by emulating a target trial in which patients were randomly assigned to switch to DOAC or maintain VKA treatment.

RESULTS

228 patients switching from VKA to DOAC compared with 563 patients maintaining VKA treatment had no overall survival advantage over a 5-year observation period (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.45, 1.55). The estimated gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was 0.003 over the 5-year period at an incremental costs of CHF 23 033 (€ 20 940). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CHF 425 852 (€ 387 138) per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying a causal inference method to real-world data, we could not demonstrate switching to DOACs to be cost-effective for AF patients with at least 1 year of VKA treatment. Our estimates align with results from a previous randomised trial.

Oral anticoagulant switching in patients with atrial fibrillation: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors may cause OAC switching.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the phenomenon of OAC switching in patients with AF, including all available evidence; frequency and patterns of switch, clinical outcomes, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, reasons for switch, factors associated with switch and evidence gaps.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, up to January 2022.

RESULTS

Of the 116 included studies, 2/3 examined vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct-acting OAC (DOAC) switching. Overall, OAC switching was common and the definition of an OAC switch varied across. Switching from VKA to dabigatran was the most prevalent switch type, but VKA to apixaban has increased in recent years. Patients on DOAC switched more to warfarin than to other DOACs. OAC doses involved in the switches were hardly reported and patients were often censored after the first switch. Switching back to a previously taken OAC (frequently warfarin) occurred in 5%-21% of switchers.The risk of ischaemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in VKA to DOAC switchers compared with non-switchers was conflicting, while there was no difference in the risk of other types of bleeding. The risk of ischaemic stroke in switchers from DOAC versus non-switchers was conflicting. Studies evaluating adherence found no significant changes in adherence after switching from VKA to DOAC, however, an increase in satisfaction with therapy were reported. Reasons for OAC switch, and factors associated with OAC switch were mostly risk factors for stroke and bleeding. Clinical outcomes, adherence and patient-reported outcomes were sparse for switches from DOACs.

CONCLUSIONS

OAC switching is common in patients with AF and patients often switch back to an OAC they have previously been on. There are aspects of OAC switching that have received little study, especially in switches from DOACs.

Prescribing Trends of Oral Anticoagulants from 2010 to 2020 in Shanghai, China: A Retrospective Study

Aim

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were developed as an alternative to warfarin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), prosthetic heart valves, venous thromboembolism (VTE), or other thrombotic disorders. The aim of this study is to explore the trends in prescribing OACs, including warfarin and NOACs, in Shanghai, China.

Methods

Prescription data of OACs were retrospectively collected from Rx Analysis System from 2010 to 2020 in Shanghai, China. Comparisons were made on the trends of each OACs according to different indications, age groups, and hospital grades. The costs and the contribution of individual OACs were also explored.

Results

Growing trends in overall prescriptions for OACs were observed. The prescriptions of NOACs were significantly increased since 2016, while the prescriptions of warfarin kept decreasing since 2017. A highly statistically significant increase in prescriptions of Rivaroxaban was observed from 2016 to 2020 (P < .001). Despite the price reduction of rivaroxaban in 2018, the total cost of rivaroxaban continued to rise (P < .001). Rivaroxaban emerged as a preferred NOAC in both indications of AF and VTE, and accounted for more than three-quarters of the total costs for OACs since 2019. Compared with rivaroxaban, the prescription numbers of dabigatran and apixaban were much smaller, and the growth of prescriptions were much slower. Differences in prescribing patterns in different indications, age groups, and grades of hospitals were also founded.

Conclusion

There has been a rapid increase in the use of OAC over the last 11 years in Shanghai, China. NOACs have been adopted rapidly, and have been gradually replacing warfarin. Warfarin remains the top choice for certain patients with valvular heart disease. Future studies are warranted considering changes in the OAC use in a larger scale, as well as the rationality and its influence factors on OAC use.

Antithrombotic treatment switching in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and the risk of thromboembolism, bleeding, and cardiac death

Background

Risks of antithrombotic switching is not investigated in elderly atrial fibrillation patients.

Objectives

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic treatment and switching of antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients (aged 75 years or older) with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We conducted a cohort study of 2943 patients with AF (Carrebean-elderly), hospitalized during 2010-2017. Cox models were used to estimate the association of antithrombotic treatment (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC] and non-guideline-recommended therapy [NG], i.e., aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin) at discharge and antithrombotic treatment switching during follow-up with the risk of a composite and single end points of thromboembolism, bleeding, and cardiac death. Crude and adjusted risk estimates were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All-cause death was evaluated, with competing risk regression and estimates expressed as subhazard ratios and 95% CIs.

Results

We observed an increased risk for the composite end point associated with NG as compared to warfarin at discharge (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38) with congruent competing risk regression results, while no significant risk difference was seen for DOACs compared to warfarin (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92-1.36). Switching from NG to warfarin/DOAC and from warfarin to DOAC occurred in 30.4% and 33.1% of respective antithrombotic treatment groups at discharge and was associated with a decreased risk for the composite end point with an adjusted HR of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.32-0.63) and a HR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.38-0.65), respectively.

Conclusions

Antithrombotic treatment switching is common in the elderly AF population. Importantly, switching to guideline-recommended treatment has a favorable impact on both effectiveness and safety.