The Effects of Cyclosporine and Aspirin on Platelet Function in Normal Dogs

Retrospective analysis of immunosuppressive and anti-thrombotic protocols in nonassociative immune mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting the effectiveness of therapeutic protocols for nonassociative immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (na-IMHA) is weak.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

Investigate the efficacy of various drugs in na-IMHA.

ANIMALS

Two hundred forty-two dogs.

METHODS

Multi-institutional retrospective study (2015-2020). Immunosuppressive effectiveness was determined by time to packed cell volume (PCV) stabilization and duration of hospitalization through analysis by mixed model linear regression. Occurrence of disease relapse, death, and antithrombotic effectiveness, were analyzed using mixed model logistic regression.

RESULTS

Use of corticosteroids vs a multi-agent protocol had no effect on time to PCV stabilization (P = .55), duration of hospitalization (P = .13), or case fatality (P = .06). A higher rate of relapse (P = .04; odds ratio: 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-14.8) was detected in dogs receiving corticosteroids (11.3%) during follow-up (median: 28.5 days, range: 0-1631 days) compared to multiple agents (3.1%) during follow up (median: 47.0 days, range: 0-1992 days). When comparing drug protocols, there was no effect on time to PCV stabilization (P = .31), relapse (P = .44), or case fatality (P = .08). Duration of hospitalization was longer, by 1.8 days (95% CI: 0.39-3.28 days), for the corticosteroid with mycophenolate mofetil group (P = .01) compared to corticosteroids alone. Use of clopidogrel vs multiple agents had no effect on development of thromboses (P ≥ .36).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Addition of a second immunosuppressive agent did not alter immediate outcome measures but might be associated with a reduction in relapse. Use of multiple antithrombotic agents did not reduce incidence of thrombosis.

Urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 concentrations in 20 dogs with primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality in dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA). At present, no reliable biomarkers of individual patient thrombotic risk are available. In human medicine, increased urinary thromboxane concentrations have utility as markers of prothrombotic tendency in various situations.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

First, to determine if urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (u11-dTXB) concentrations are increased in dogs with primary IMHA compared to normal dogs; second, to assess whether u11-dTXB concentration is associated with survival, known prognostic indicators, or frequency of thrombosis in dogs with IMHA.

ANIMALS

Twenty client-owned dogs diagnosed with primary IMHA and 17 healthy dogs volunteered by hospital staff.

METHODS

Prospective case-control study. A previously validated ELISA was used to measure urine 11-dTXB concentrations, which were normalized to urine creatinine concentration (u11-dTXB:Cr). Samples were obtained at presentation from patients with primary IMHA. Standard clincopathological data at baseline and survival data were collected. Urinary 11-dTXB:Cr was compared between outcome subgroups, and correlated with known markers of disease severity.

RESULTS

Baseline u11-dTXB:Cr was significantly higher in dogs with IMHA than in healthy dogs (median, 3.75; range, 0.83-25.36 vs 0.65; 0.24-2.57; P = .003) but did not differ between dogs with IMHA that survived and did not survive to 30 days after presentation, nor between dogs with and without clinical suspicion of thrombotic disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Urinary 11-dTXB:Cr is increased in dogs with IMHA compared to healthy controls, consistent with a prothrombotic state. However, in this IMHA population u11-dTXB:Cr was not associated with survival or suspected thrombosis.

The use of impedance aggregometry to evaluate platelet function after the administration of DDAVP in healthy dogs treated with aspirin or clopidogrel

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 1-Desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP; desmopressin acetate) on platelet aggregation in healthy dogs receiving aspirin or clopidogrel.

ANIMALS

7 healthy staff-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES

In this randomized double-blinded crossover study, impedance aggregometry was performed on samples of lithium-heparinized whole blood samples from dogs before (T0) treatment with aspirin (1 mg/kg, PO, q 24 h for 4 days; ASP group) or clopidogrel (1 mg/kg, PO, q 24 h for 4 days; CLP group) and then before (T1) and after (T2) treatment with DDAVP (0.3 μg/kg, IV, once). There was a 14-day washout period before the crossover component. Aggregometry was performed with 4 different assays, each of which involved a different agonist reagent to stimulate platelet function: ADP, thrombin receptor activating peptide-6, arachidonic acid, or collagen type 1.

RESULTS

Median results for platelet aggregometry with agonist reagents ADP, arachidonic acid, or thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 significantly decreased between T0 and T1 for the CLP group; however, no meaningful difference in platelet aggregation was detected in the ASP group. Results for platelet aggregometry did not differ substantially between T1 and T2 regardless of treatment group or assay.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Findings suggested that administration of DDAVP may have no effect on platelet aggregation (measured with platelet aggregometry) in healthy dogs treated with clopidogrel. Because no inhibition of platelet aggregation was detected for dogs in the ASP group, no conclusion could be made regarding the effects of DDAVP administered to dogs treated with aspirin.

Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE): Domain 3-Defining antithrombotic protocols

OBJECTIVES

To systematically examine the evidence for use of a specific protocol (dose, frequency, route) of selected antithrombotic drugs, in comparisons to no therapy or to other antithrombotic therapies, to reduce the risk of complications or improve outcomes in dogs and cats at risk for thrombosis.

DESIGN

Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice.

SETTINGS

Academic and referral veterinary medical centers.

RESULTS

Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Eight different antithrombotic drugs were investigated using a standardized Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) question format both for dogs and cats, including aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban, generating a total of 16 worksheets. Most studies identified were experimental controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (LOE 3) with only four randomized controlled clinical trials in companion animals (LOE 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, evidence-based recommendations concerning specific protocols could not be formulated for most antithrombotic drugs evaluated, either because of the wide range of dosage reported (eg, aspirin in dogs) or the lack of evidence in the current literature. However, clopidogrel administration in dogs and cats at risk of arterial thrombosis, notably in cats at risk of cardiogenic thromboembolism, is supported by the literature, and specific protocols were recommended. Comparably, aspirin should not be used as a sole antithrombotic in cats with cardiomyopathy. Using the available safety profile information contained in the literature, the panel reached consensus on suggested dosage schemes for most antithrombotics. Significant knowledge gaps were highlighted, which will hopefully drive novel research.

Investigation into the causes of aspirin resistance in healthy dogs

Antiplatelet effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) may be poor in some individuals. Additionally, no method exists for predicting poor ASA response (resistance) in individual dogs. This study's main objective was to determine whether poor ASA response results from pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic causes. ASA concentrations causing 50% inhibition of platelet aggregation (in vitro IC50) were determined using whole blood collected from 21 drug-free healthy dogs to evaluate intrinsic sensitivity of platelets to ASA. Dogs were then administered ASA at 4 mg/kg once orally. Percent decrease in platelet aggregation from baseline, and plasma ASA and salicylic acid (SA) concentrations (expressed as AUC values) were measured for up to 3 hr. By 3 hr, 13/21 (62%) dogs showed >50% aggregation inhibition, while 8/21 (38%) dogs showed <50% inhibition. Aggregation inhibition values were negatively correlated with in vitro IC50 values (Rs = -0.49; p = 0.028) and positively correlated with ASA concentrations (Rs = 0.48; p = 0.03). Furthermore, ASA concentrations were strongly negatively correlated (Rs = -0.88; p < 0.001) with SA/ASA concentration ratios, an index of ASA metabolism to SA by esterase enzymes. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that 59% (p < 0.001) of interindividual variability in aggregation inhibition was explained by in vitro IC50 values (29% of variability) and ASA concentrations (29% of variability). Consequently, poor in vivo ASA response in these dogs resulted from both pharmacodynamic (decreased platelet sensitivity) and pharmacokinetic (lower ASA concentrations) causes. Lower ASA concentrations may be explained by reduced bioavailability associated with higher esterase activities.

Effects of immunosuppressive agents on the hemostatic system in normal dogs

Background

In dogs, the effects of immunosuppressive medications on hemostasis are not well known.

Hypothesis/Objectives

The objective was to determine the effects of immunosuppressive medications on primary and secondary hemostasis. Our hypothesis was that cyclosporine and prednisone would increase markers of hypercoagulability and thromboxane synthesis, while azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and leflunomide would have minimal effects on hemostasis.

Animals

Eight healthy dogs.

Methods

A randomized, cross‐over study used aggregometry, the PFA‐100 platelet function analyzer, viscoelastometry, platelet count, and prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times to evaluate hemostasis during the administration of prednisone, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and leflunomide for 1 week each at standard oral doses. Urine 11‐dehydro‐thromboxane‐B₂ (11‐dTXB₂) and 6‐keto‐prostaglandin‐F_1α (6‐keto‐PGF_1α) concentrations, normalized to urine creatinine concentration, were measured.

Results

The aggregometry amplitude decreased from 51 ± 21 to 27 ± 14 (P = .002) during leflunomide treatment (ADP activation), but there were no differences in amplitude (P = .240) for any medications when platelets were activated with collagen. For all medications, there were no significant differences in viscoelastometry indices (ACT, P = .666; ClotRate, P = .340; and platelet function, P = .411) and platelet count (P = .552). Compared with pretreatment values, urinary 11‐dTXB₂‐to‐creatinine ratio increased (P = .001) after drug administration (from 3.7 ± 0.6 to 5.6 ± 1.1). Cyclosporine was associated with an increase (P < .001) in the 6‐keto‐PGF_1α‐to‐creatinine ratio (from 10.3 ± 4.6 to 22.1 ± 5.3).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Most immunosuppressive drugs do not enhance platelet function or coagulation in healthy dogs, suggesting that these medications might not predispose hypercoagulable dogs to thromboembolism. The results of our study need to be correlated with the clinical outcomes of hypercoagulable dogs.