Parambeth JC, Fosgate GT, Suchodolski JS, Lidbury JA, Steiner JM. Randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of an enteric coated micro-pelleted formulation of a pancreatic enzyme supplement in dogs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.
J Vet Intern Med 2018;
32:1591-1599. [PMID:
30221800 PMCID:
PMC6189344 DOI:
10.1111/jvim.15235]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Pancreatic enzyme supplements for the treatment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in dogs can be uncoated or enteric coated. Enteric coated supplements might be advantageous.
Hypothesis/Objectives
Enteric coated enzyme supplements are superior to uncoated supplements in dogs with clinical EPI.
Animals
Eleven dogs with naturally occurring EPI that were apparently free from other diseases.
Methods
Randomized, blinded, controlled cross‐over clinical trial comparing a novel micro‐encapsulated enteric coated enzyme supplement to a commercially available uncoated product in dogs with clinical EPI. Search of serum canine serum trypsin‐like immunoreactivity concentration ≤ 2.5 µg/L in the Gastrointestinal Laboratory database was used to identify dogs with EPI.
Results
There was no difference −4.46% (95% CI: −7.97%‐–0.96%; P = .15) in the % acid hydrolysis fecal fat (primary outcome) between the enteric coated formulation (median: 11.8%; range 6.4%‐17.0%) and the uncoated pancreatic enzyme replacement product (median: 17.5%; range: 5.2%‐24.9%) in the 11 dogs that completed the study. Other variables did not differ between treatments.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
This study, which had low statistical power, did not detect a difference between formulations.
Collapse