Eligibility and safety of the first interferon-free therapy against hepatitis C in a real-world setting

Frequency of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in the Changing Field of HCV Therapy

Background

With the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) emerged as significant challenge. Since then, HCV therapy and the infected population have rapidly changed. So far, very limited data are available regarding the clinical relevance of DDIs when using most modern DAA regimens. We aimed to assess how the importance of DDIs has evolved over time.

Methods

From January 2014 to July 2018, 668 consecutive HCV patients were evaluated for their outpatient medication and assessed for DDIs with DAAs. Different time periods were defined based on market approval of key DAAs: A (01/2014-11/2014), B (11/2014-08/2016), and C (08/2016-07/2018).

Results

The frequency of patients with real-world DDIs was highest in period B (A: 37.1%, B: 49.6%, C: 38.8%). The recently approved DAAs (period C) theoretically showed a lower DDI risk profile. However, real-world DDIs were still comparable to period A, as HCV patients' characteristics changed (eg, age ≥75 years: A: 3.1%, B: 9.8%, C: 5.6%; polypharmacy/patients with ≥8 drugs: A: 11.1%, B: 15.2%, C: 17.2%). Furthermore, although DDIs via CYP 3A4 became less important for some modern regimens, other mechanisms like an altered pH value in the stomach, causing reduced bioavailability, evolved. Relevant DDIs most frequently occurred with proton pump inhibitors, metamizole, statins, and carvedilol.

Conclusions

DDIs during antiviral treatment still affect about 40% of HCV patients. The lower DDI potential of modern DAA regimens is partly counteracted by changing patient characteristics. Therefore, DDIs should not be underestimated.

Outcomes of treatment with direct-acting antivirals for infection with hepatitis C virus genotypes 1-4 in an ambulatory care setting

PURPOSE

Outcomes with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-4 were determined.

METHODS

A total of 360 patients at 36 clinical sites in Massachusetts with HCV genotypes 1-4 and a prescription for at least one DAA medication between May 2011 and October 2015 were included. The primary investigator completed a retrospective and concurrent chart review, and data were collected through April 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 446 patients were assessed for eligibility into the study, with 86 patients excluded. The majority of patients were white males with genotype 1 infection. About half of the patients were treatment naive (TN), and 40% of patients had documented cirrhosis. TN patients without cirrhosis had the highest overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate at 107 of 109 (98.2%), followed by treatment-experienced (TE) patients without cirrhosis at 59 of 63 (93.7%), TN patients with cirrhosis at 40 of 46 (87.0%), and TE patients with cirrhosis at 64 of 79 (81.0%) when boceprevir- and telaprevir-containing regimens were excluded. A total of 7 of 360 (1.9%) patients reported missing at least one dose of medication. Adverse drug reactions reported in the electronic medical record (EMR) were collected for analysis and included patients who received at least one dose of medication and had adequate EMR documentation.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with DAAs for infection with HCV genotypes 1-4, variables favoring achievement of SVR included an age of <45 years, a body mass index of <25 kg/m², absence of cirrhosis, a fibrosis score of 0-2, and being TN.

Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: Efficacy, Side Effects and Complications

Background

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to liver cirrhosis and its complications. Viral eradication is essential to prevent disease progression and reduces liver-related mortality and morbidity. Since the availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), HCV treatment has changed significantly. Current treatment strategies for different groups of patients as well as potential risks and caveats will be discussed in this review.

Summary

Interferon-free (IFN-free) treatment not only shortens treatment duration, but also achieves high rates of viral clearance and is overall well tolerated. Genotype-restricted but also pangenotypic combinations are available. Usually two DAA of different drug classes are combined. For the majority of the patients, treatment duration ranges from 8 to 12 weeks. Liver and kidney function as well as prior treatment experience and potential drug-drug interactions influence substance choices and treatment duration. However, modern IFN-free treatment is not only safer, but also overall far more simplified and effective. Global HCV eradication might be an ambitious but not completely unrealistic goal to pursue.

Key Messages

IFN-free antiviral treatment is safe and well tolerated. Patients can be treated almost independently of liver function or concomitant disease. Viral eradication is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality and better quality of life.

Outcomes and costs of treating hepatitis C patients with second-generation direct-acting antivirals: results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry

OBJECTIVE

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is associated with a significant health burden. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has led to an increase in sustained virologic response rates (SVR), but is accompanied by higher treatment costs. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes and costs of treating hepatitis C virus infected patients with DAAs in clinical practice in Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were derived from a noninterventional study including a pharmacoeconomic subset of 2673 patients with genotypes 1 and 3 who initiated and completed treatment between February 2014 and February 2017. Sociodemographic and clinical parameters as well as resource utilization were collected using a web-based data recording system. Costs were calculated using official remuneration schemes.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 54.6 years; 48% were men. 93.5% of all patients achieved an SVR. The average total treatment costs were &OV0556;67 979 (&OV0556;67 131 medication costs, &OV0556;824 ambulatory care, &OV0556;24 hospital costs). The average costs per SVR of &OV0556;72 705 were calculated. Differences in SVR and costs according to genotype, treatment regimen, treatment experience, and cirrhosis were observed. Quality-of-life data showed no or a minimal decrease during treatment.

CONCLUSION

This analysis confirms high SVR rates for newly introduced DAAs in a real-world setting. Costs per SVR estimated are comparable to first-generation DAA. Given the fact that the costs for the currently used treatment regimens have declined, it can be assumed that the costs per SVR have also decreased. Our insight into real-world outcomes and costs can serve as a basis for a comparison with the mentioned newly introduced treatment regimens.

Real-world effect of ribavirin on quality of life in HCV-infected patients receiving interferon-free treatment

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ribavirin (RBV) is commonly used for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, RBV is associated with a reduced quality of life (QOL). We aim to assess the impact of RBV on QOL in a real-world setting.

METHODS

In a prospective study, QOL was measured by a SF-36 questionnaire in 174 patients. In all, 85 patients were treated with RBV and 89 patients without RBV. QOL was assessed at baseline, week 12 of treatment and 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Patients treated with RBV were more likely to have HCV genotype 2 and 3 infection and cirrhosis (all P < .05). RBV-treated patients reported lower scores for several domains of QOL already at baseline. During HCV treatment, RBV-free treatment led to an increase in all measured dimensions of quality of life, whereas RBV treatment led to a decrease in the emotional and physical functioning. After treatment, all dimensions for QOL showed improvement across the study cohort, regardless whether RBV was part of the treatment regimen. However, 28.8%-45.2% of treated patients perceive a sustained reduction in their physical or mental capacity after treatment, not related to RBV usage or SVR, but related to older age (P = .03) and cirrhosis (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

During treatment, RBV leads to a reduced QOL, whereas RBV-free treatment leads to an increased QOL. After treatment, QOL strongly increases in both, RBV and RBV-free treated patients. Some patients perceive a sustained reduction in QOL, which seems unrelated to treatment.

Long-term outcome of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in a real-world setting: The German LOTOS study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are few large-scale, prospective studies comparing liver-associated events in treated and untreated patients with CHC managed in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients with CHC were prospectively enrolled in a non-interventional study. Data from patients with available documentation who had either achieved a sustained virological response, or were non-responders, relapsers, or had virological breakthrough following treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a±ribavirin, or who had been diagnosed but never treated at least 3 years previously, and who remained under medical observation were analyzed. Primary endpoint was liver-associated events (composite of decompensation/liver failure, ascites, hepatocellular carcinoma, or liver transplant/placement on a transplant list).

RESULTS

In all, 1444 eligible patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 4.7 (standard deviation; SD 1.1) years. Patients with sustained virological response had a lower incidence of liver-associated events vs non-responders, relapsers, or virological breakthrough and never treated patients (1.7% vs 4.7% and 4.7% respectively). The proportion of patients with cirrhosis increased from baseline in the non-responders, relapsers, or virological breakthrough (6.8%-10.5%) and never treated group (3.7%-8.4%), with an associated increase in severity, but was unchanged in the sustained virological response group (2.1%). Event-free survival was significantly higher in sustained virological response patients (P=.0082).

CONCLUSIONS

In this "real-world" cohort, the achievement of sustained virological response almost eliminated liver-related morbidity and mortality compared with patients who failed to achieve sustained virological response and those who were untreated. Overall, the LOTOS cohort highlights the importance of timely and effective treatment for patients with CHC.

Prioritization for interferon-free regimens and potential drug interactions of current direct-acting anti-hepatitis C agents in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

We determined the proportions of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in association with possible prioritized indications for interferon-free regimens and the use of co-medications with potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs).

METHODS

Five hundred consecutive mono-infected CHC patients seen in 2015 at 5 Greek centers were included. Priorities for interferon-free regimens were based on liver disease severity, contraindication(s) for interferon and prior interferon-treatment failure. All co-medications were classified into those with no DDIs/no clear data for DDIs, potential DDIs, and contraindication due to DDI for each agent, according to the HEP Drug Interaction Checker.

RESULTS

Of the 500 patients, 1% had undergone liver transplantation, whereas 6.6% had decompensated cirrhosis, 21.8% F4, 17.1% F3, 10.4% F2, and 34.8% F0-1 fibrosis. Contraindications for interferon were present in 38.5% of non-transplant patients with compensated liver disease. The probability of contraindications/potential DDIs was greater for boceprevir/telaprevir and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir±dasabuvir, compared to all other agents (P<0.001), and least for sofosbuvir (P<0.05). Contraindications/potential DDIs were more frequently present in patients ≥50 than <50 years old (P≤0.034), and more common in F3-4 than F0-2, and F4 than F0-3 fibrosis (P≤0.019) for all direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).

CONCLUSIONS

The expansion of the criteria for prioritization of interferon-free regimens from cirrhosis to F3 and perhaps F2 fibrosis will increase the proportion of patients with DAA access by only 10-15% and 10%, respectively. A potential for DDIs is frequently present with protease inhibitors, but also exists with other DAAs. The probability of DDIs is higher in patients with priority for DAAs, including those who have advanced liver disease and are usually of older age.

Prognosis of 1169 hepatitis C chronically infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis in the predirect-acting antiviral era

At a population level, little is known regarding the risk of liver- and nonliver-related mortality and hospitalization and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC). This large-scale national record-linkage study estimates these outcomes following first hospital admission for DC. Record-linkages between national HCV diagnosis and clinical databases and the national inpatient hospital episode database and mortality register were conducted to follow-up the disease course of all identified HCV-diagnosed and chronically infected persons. The study population consisted of 1169 HCV chronically infected persons who had a first hospital admission for DC within the period 1994-2013. We observed an overall average annual percentage change of 12.6% in new DC patients (from 63 in 1994-1999 to 541 in 2009-2013), with no evidence for any improvement in the relative risks of liver-related or all-cause death over time. Between 1 January 1994 and 31 May 2014, 722 and 95 DC patients had died of a liver- and a nonliver-related cause, respectively, and 106 patients had a subsequent first admission for HCC. The 5-year cumulative incidence of liver-related mortality, nonliver-related mortality and first subsequent HCC admission was 61.3%, 8.2% and 8.8%, respectively. The health burden in HCV-infected patients associated with development of decompensated cirrhosis has increased dramatically over the last 20 years. Our findings establish the baseline mortality and HCC progression rates in DC patients against which the impact of new antiviral therapies can be measured.

Managing drug-drug interactions with new direct-acting antiviral agents in chronic hepatitis C

Several direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have marketing authorization in Europe and in the USA and have changed the landscape of hepatitis C treatment: each DAA has its own metabolism and drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and managing them is a challenge. To compile the pharmacokinetics and DDI data of the new DAA and to provide a guide for management of DDI. An indexed MEDLINE search was conducted using the keywords: DAA, hepatitis C, simeprevir, daclatasvir, ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, 3D regimen (paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir), DDI and pharmacokinetics. Data were also collected from hepatology, and infectious disease and clinical pharmacology conferences abstracts. Food can play a role in the absorption of DAAs. Most of the interactions are linked to metabolism (cytochrome P450-3 A4 [CYP3A4]) or hepatic and/or intestinal transporters (organic anion-transporting polypeptide and P-glycoprotein [P-gp]). To a lesser extent other pathways can be involved such as breast cancer resistance protein transporter or UDP-glucuronosyltransferase metabolism. DDI are more likely to occur with 3D regimen, daclatasvir, simeprevir and ledipasvir, as they are all both substrates and inhibitors of P-gp and/or CYP3A4, than with sofosbuvir. They can increase concentrations of coadministered drugs and their concentrations may be influenced by P-gp or CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors. Overdosage or low dosage can be encountered with potent inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 or drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. The key to interpret DDI data is a good understanding of the pharmacokinetic profiles of the drugs involved. Their ability to inhibit CYP450-3A4 and transporters (hepatic and/or intestinal) can have significant clinical consequences.

Safety and efficacy of daclatasvir-sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1-mono-infected patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We report the first real-life results of the sofosbuvir+daclatasvir combination in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infected patients.

METHODS

The France REcherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites (ANRS) CO22 HEPATHER "Therapeutic options for hepatitis B and C: A French cohort" is a multicentre observational cohort which aims to include 15,000 HCV- and 10,000 HBV-infected patients. We selected all participants (n=768) with a HCV genotype 1 who initiated sofosbuvir (400mg/day) and daclatasvir (60mg/day) before October 1st 2014, with or without ribavirin (1-1.2g/day) for a duration of 12weeks or 24weeks. The main endpoint criterion was sustained virological response at 12weeks (SVR12), defined by the absence of detectable HCV-RNA 12weeks after the last treatment intake. Missing SVR12 measurements were imputed using SVR24 measurements (n=45), otherwise considered as virological failure (n=18).

RESULTS

A SVR12 was obtained in 729/768 (95%) patients, ranging from 92% (12-week sofosbuvir+daclatasvir) to 99% (24-week sofosbuvir+daclatasvir+ribavirin). The SVR12 rates did not significantly differ between the 24-week (550/574 (96%)) and the 12-week (179/194 (92%); p=0.0688) durations or between regimens with (165/169 (98%)) or without ribavirin (564/599 (94%); p=0.0850). The SVR12 rate was greater than 97% in non-cirrhotic patients irrespective of the treatment duration or the addition of ribavirin. Among cirrhotic patients, the SVR12 rate was higher with 24 than 12-week regimen (423/444 (95%) vs. 105/119 (88%); p=0.0054).

CONCLUSION

The sofosbuvir+daclatasvir combination is associated with a high rate of SVR12 in patients infected by genotype 1, with an optimal duration of 12weeks in non-cirrhotic and 24weeks in cirrhotic patients. The number of patients receiving ribavirin was too low to adequately assess its impact.

LAY SUMMARY

The sofosbuvir+daclatasvir combination of antiviral drugs is associated with a high rate (95%) of viral eradication in patients infected by HCV genotype 1. The best duration of a ribavirin-free sofosbuvir+daclatasvir combination seems to be 12weeks in non-cirrhotic patients and 24weeks for those with cirrhosis. Clinical trial number: NCT01953458.

Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?

On-treatment hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA has been used to predict response to interferon (IFN)-based therapy. The concept of response-guided treatment (RGT) was established to determine optimal treatment duration and to early identify patients not responding to futile therapies. RGT helped to improve sustained virologic response (SVR) rates and lower the rates of adverse effects. RGT was of particular importance for telaprevir- and boceprevir-based triple therapies. RGT strategies are dependent on highly sensitive and reproducible HCV RNA quantification. However, different HCV RNA assays are used in routine clinical practice and these differ significantly in their performance characteristics. The development of IFN-free therapies has fundamentally changed the role of on-treatment HCV RNA for SVR prediction. Given the high efficacy and excellent tolerability of IFN-free regimens, the interest in treatment individualization has decreased. However, shorter treatment durations may still be desirable, particularly with respect to the high costs of current IFN-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Moreover, some difficult-to-treat patients remain, e.g., those infected with HCV genotype 3 in whom the current standard of care may not always be sufficient to achieve SVR, especially in treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis. Here, a RGT extension may be feasible. However, current data on the predictive value of on-treatment HCV RNA are limited and have shown conflicting results. As more potent DAAs become available, the role of response prediction may diminish further. Currently, shorter treatment duration is only based on baseline HCV RNA whereas no RGT strategy is recommended for any of the approved DAA regimens available.

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for HCV genotype 1b infection in patients with or without compensated cirrhosis: a pooled analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We compared outcomes by cirrhosis status across studies of the all-oral combination of daclatasvir (DCV) plus asunaprevir (ASV).

METHODS

Outcomes from global and Japanese phase 2 and 3 clinical studies of DCV+ASV in patients with genotype (GT) 1b infection were assessed by cirrhosis status. Sustained virological response (SVR) was assessed in individual phase 3 studies; a pooled analysis was carried out for safety outcomes.

RESULTS

In the Japanese phase 3 study, SVR12 was achieved by 91% of patients with cirrhosis (n = 22) and 84% of patients without cirrhosis (n = 200); in the global phase 3 study, SVR12 was achieved by 84% of patients with cirrhosis (n = 206) and by 85% of patients without cirrhosis (n = 437). The frequency of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and treatment-emergent grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities was low (<10%) and similar among patients with (n = 229) or without (n = 689) compensated cirrhosis receiving DCV+ASV. Grade 3/4 reductions in platelets and neutrophils were more common among patients with cirrhosis (1.3 and 2.2%, respectively) compared with those without cirrhosis (both 0.6%). Grade 3/4 liver function test abnormalities were less common among patients with cirrhosis (1.8%) compared with those without cirrhosis (3.5-4.7%). Alanine aminotransferase elevations were not associated with hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy of DCV+ASV were similar in patients with or without compensated cirrhosis. This all-oral, interferon- and ribavirin-free combination is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with HCV GT1b infection and cirrhosis. Trial registrations numbers: Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01012895; NCT01051414; NCT01581203; NCT01497834.

The impact of the revolution in hepatitis C treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis C infection represents a global health problem affecting ∼200 million chronically infected patients worldwide. Owing to the development of a fibrogenic and inflammatory micromilieu in the liver, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients are at a high risk of developing fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), however, has spurred a revolution in the treatment of HCV patients with sustained viral response (SVR) rates exceeding 90% in real-life settings. Recent clinical trials suggest that these novel treatments will not only alter the epidemiology of HCV infection but also the incidence of HCV-induced complications including hepatic decompensation, liver transplantation and hepatocarcinogenesis. Here, we summarize data from clinical trials carried out in HCV patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis and analyze the impact of viral clearance on HCC development and treatment. Finally, we review and discuss current and future treatment options of HCV patients with HCC in pre- and post-transplantation settings.

Review article: safety and tolerability of direct-acting anti-viral agents in the new era of hepatitis C therapy

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) licensed to treat chronic HCV infection have revolutionised treatment algorithms by drastically mitigating side effects while enhancing efficacy relative to interferon-based therapy.

AIM

To review adverse events (AEs) uniquely associated with DAA therapy across a broad spectrum of patient populations.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed and FDA surveillance studies were undertaken to complete an exhaustive review. Search terms included 'DAAs', 'safety', and 'tolerability'.

RESULTS

While DAAs are remarkably well tolerated, they are accompanied by unique AEs. Simeprevir, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor, has been known, albeit infrequently, to cause mild hyperbilirubinemia and photosensitivity reactions; and paritaprevir boosted with ritonavir causes bilirubin and ALT elevations. Asunaprevir, another protease inhibitor, infrequently causes elevated transaminase levels. NS5A and NS5B inhibitors are well tolerated, although sofosbuvir is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment. Ribavirin co-administered in certain treatment regimens has been associated with cough, rash and haemolytic anaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

With the impending reality of a more tolerable interferon-sparing regimen, the future of DAA therapy offers shorter treatment duration, simplified disease management, and a patient-centred regimen. With advantages come drawbacks, including development of resistance to therapy and accessibility to this expensive treatment. DAA therapy continues to advance at a brisk pace with a promising trend for higher tolerability, even in difficult-to-treat subgroups such as those with cirrhosis, nonresponders to prior therapy, and transplant recipients. Subgroup-specific contraindications and safety-related limitations are active areas of research. Concerted research efforts and continuing advances lend hope to the goal of rendering HCV a routinely curable disease.

Update on hepatitis C: Direct-acting antivirals

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was discovered 26 years ago. For decades, interferon-based therapy has been the mainstay of treatment for HCV. Recently, several direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have been approved for treatment of HCV-infected patients and to help combat the virus. These drugs have revolutionized the management of HCV as all-oral regimens with favorable side effect profiles and superior rates of sustained virological response. Emerging real-world data are demonstrating results comparable to registration trials for DAA agents. Suddenly, the potential for eradicating HCV is on the horizon.

Drug-Drug Interactions With Novel All Oral Interferon-Free Antiviral Agents in a Large Real-World Cohort

BACKGROUND

With the approval of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), the management of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) has become an important challenge while treating individuals with hepatitis C. To date, the potential of causing DDIs for the recently approved DAAs has not been systematically investigated. We aimed to assess the clinical significance of DDI between the regular outpatient medications and DAA therapies in a large real-world cohort.

METHODS

Overall, 261 hepatitis C virus monoinfected patients who were selected for DAA therapy at 2 intervals between 2011 and 2014 were asked about their regular outpatient medications. The potential for DDIs between all these drugs and sofosbuvir/ribavirin, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/simeprevir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir as well as boceprevir and telaprevir triple therapy was assessed using www.hep-druginteractions.org and the relevant prescribing information.

RESULTS

The 261 patients took a median number of 2 drugs (range 0-15); 20% of patients did not take any medication. Sofosbuvir/ribavirin had the lowest risk to cause a potentially significant DDI (9.6%). In contrast, for ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir potentially significant DDIs could be expected in 66.3% of the patients. Significant DDIs for sofosbuvir/simeprevir would be expected in 31.4%, for sofosbuvir/daclatasvir in 36.8%, and for sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in 40.2%. Proton pump inhibitors, thyroid hormones, and dihydropyridine derivatives were frequently used and presented a risk of interacting with the antiviral regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients are at risk for DDIs if treated with the recently approved DAA regimens. A careful evaluation of potential DDI is essential to prevent adverse effects or unnecessary risk of treatment failure.

Direct antiviral agent treatment of decompensated hepatitis C virus-induced liver cirrhosis

Recently, direct antiviral agents (DAAs) have been increasingly used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, replacing interferon-based regimens that have severe adverse effects and low tolerability. The constant supply of new DAAs makes shorter treatment periods with enhanced safety possible. The efficacy of DAAs for treatment of compensated liver cirrhosis (LC) is not less than that for treatment of non-cirrhotic conditions. These clinical advantages have been useful in pre- and post-liver transplantation (LT) settings. Moreover, DAAs can be used to treat decompensated HCV-induced LC in elderly patients or those with severe complications otherwise having poor prognosis. Although encouraging clinical data are beginning to appear, the actual efficacy of DAAs for suppressing disease progression, allowing delisting for LT and, most importantly, improving prognosis of patients with decompensated HCV-LC remains unknown. Case-control studies to examine the short- or long-term effects of DAAs for treatment of decompensated HCV-LC are urgently need.

Improvement of liver function parameters in advanced HCV-associated liver cirrhosis by IFN-free antiviral therapies

BACKGROUND

Successful antiviral treatment of decompensated hepatitis B with HBV polymerase inhibitors is associated with improvement of liver function. To what extent liver function also improves in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving novel interferon-free (IFN-free) therapies is unknown.

AIM

To study liver function in cirrhotic HCV patients receiving IFN-free therapies.

METHODS

We here studied 80 consecutive patients with advanced HCV associated liver cirrhosis including 34 patients (43%) with Child B/C cirrhosis and 42 patients (53%) with platelet counts of <90.000/μL receiving different combinations of direct acting antivirals without interferon [sofosbuvir/ribavirin (n = 56), sofosbuvir/simeprevir ± ribavirin (n = 15) and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir ± ribavirin (n = 9)]. The majority of patients was infected with HCV genotype 1 (n = 50); HCV genotypes 2, 3 and 4 were present in 4, 24 and 2 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Liver function parameters including albumin, bilirubin, cholinesterase and prothrombin time all improved in the majority of patients during antiviral therapy irrespectively of the underlying HCV genotype, however, with different kinetics. MELD scores improved until post-treatment week 12 in 44% of the patients but worsened in 15%. A sustained virological response was achieved in 63% of the patients. HCV RNA relapse led to moderate ALT increases in 15/23 patients but was not associated with hepatic decompensations.

CONCLUSION

This real-world single centre study showed that interferon-free treatment of hepatitis C patients with advanced liver cirrhosis restores liver function, and may thereby reduce the need for liver transplantations.