Epidemiology update for hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus in end-stage renal disease in France

Compliance with good practice guidelines for the prevention of vascular access infections: the multi-centre PHYDEL survey in French haemodialysis units

BACKGROUND

French guidelines for the prevention of vascular access infections in a haemodialysis setting were released in 2005. Compliance with these guidelines is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess compliance with the guidelines for vascular access infection prevention in French haemodialysis units, and to describe the difficulties reported.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and December 2019 in 200 haemodialysis units in France, selected at random. Data were collected via questionnaire, completed by telephone interview with an infection control practitioner. A practice was deemed compliant when >85% of units declared that they always complied with the guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 103 units (51.5%) agreed to participate. Most practices complied with the guidelines; however, some practices did not reach the 85% compliance threshold for working in pairs when connecting central venous catheter (CVC) lines, performing hand hygiene before disconnecting lines, rinsing antiseptic soap before painting CVC exit site or arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture site, allowing antiseptic paint to dry, handling CVC branches with antiseptic impregnated gauze, performing hand hygiene after AVF compression with gloves, wearing protective eyewear when connecting/disconnecting CVC or when puncturing AVF, and wearing a gown when puncturing AVF. The most frequently reported difficulties were understaffing, difficulties with skin preparation because of exit site skin damage, and lack of buttonhole technical expertise.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good overall compliance, this survey highlights some shortcomings in compliance with infection prevention guidelines, which could be associated with either higher risk of vascular access infection or increased blood-borne virus transmission.

Comparative Survival Analysis of Dialysis and Renal Transplantation in HBV-Infected End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

The potential risks and benefits of kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) have been a subject of debate. This study aimed to provide real-world data on the relative risks of death and clinical outcomes associated with kidney transplantation in this context.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database from 1997 to 2013, extracting cohorts of patients who are HBV-infected ESRD. The main outcome measure was overall survival, whereas the secondary measure was the relative risk of death and survival benefit through propensity-score matching (1:1).

RESULTS

Of the 4895 patients who are HBV-infected with ESRD, 172 renal transplant recipients were enrolled for analysis. There was a numeric trend towards higher overall survival rates in renal transplant recipients, although this was not statistically significant (P = .057). A significant survival benefit was observed in the renal transplant group if the follow-up was longer than one year (P = 0.007). The relative risks of death among renal transplant recipients were initially higher at 2.0 times that of patients on chronic dialysis, presenting in a hyperbolic pattern with equal risks at 462 days. The likelihood of survival became equal until 1649 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that kidney transplantation may be a viable option for patients who are HBV-infected with ESRD, given the significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of death risks observed four to five years after successful transplantation. This real-world data can help clinicians make informed decisions regarding the management of ESRD in patients who are HBV-infected.

Lifetime Risk of Hepatorenal Events Assessed in Longitudinal Cohort of Renal Transplant Recipients with HBV Infection

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is a treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, the impact of nucleos(t)ide analogues usage on the clinical outcomes in HBV-infected ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation is not well understood. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with HBV infection using real-world data to provide insight into the disease course over time.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective longitudinal population-level cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database. The study evaluated patient and allograft survival and kidney-related and liver-related events and identified factors contributing to these events.

RESULTS

Of the 4838 renal transplant recipients in the study, there were no significant differences in graft survival between the HBV-infected and non-infected groups (P = .244). However, the HBV-infected group had suboptimal patient survival compared to the non-infected group (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival, 1.80; 95% CI 1.40-2.30; P < .001). Diabetes mellitus was associated with a higher re-dialysis rate (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.38-2.12; P < .001) regarding kidney-associated events. For liver-associated events, HBV-infected status (HR, 9.40; 95% CI, 5.66-15.63; P < .001), and age >60 years (HR, 6.90; 95% CI, 3.14-15.19; P < .001) were associated with increased incidence of liver cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis B-infected renal transplant recipients have comparable graft survival but inferior patient survival outcomes due to pre-existing diseases and increasing liver-related complications. The findings of this study can help optimize treatment strategies and improve long-term outcomes for this patient population.

Healthcare-associated hepatitis B and C transmission to patients in the EU/EEA and UK: a systematic review of reported outbreaks between 2006 and 2021

Healthcare-associated transmission was the second most common hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) transmission route according to 2006-2012 European surveillance data, but data quality and completeness issues hinder comprehensive characterisation of this important issue. We carried out a systematic review of published literature on healthcare-associated transmission of HBV or HCV in European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) countries and the United Kingdom to complement surveillance data and identify higher-risk settings. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases and grey literature over the period January 2006 to September 2021, for publications reporting transmission events after 2000 in the EU/EEA and UK related to a healthcare setting or procedure. We collected data on the country, number of patients, setting type and route of transmission. In 65 publications from 16 countries, 43 HBV and 48 HCV events were identified resulting in 442 newly infected patients. Most events were reported from Italy (7 HBV and 12 HCV), Germany (8 HBV and 5 HCV) and the United Kingdom (8 HBV and 5 HCV). The number of patients infected from a single source within an event ranged from 1 to 53. Five large outbreaks of over 20 cases were identified, including two in Poland and one each in Belgium, Hungary and Slovakia. The majority of transmission events occurred through blood transfusions or in dialysis units. However, there were a number of outbreaks in seemingly low risk settings such as CT/MRI scanning units. A failure to adequately follow infection prevention control (IPC) precautions was reported in 30% of included studies. Healthcare-associated transmission of hepatitis B and C continues to occur in a range of community and hospital settings across EU/EEA countries and often results in large outbreaks, although the true extent of the situation cannot be fully determined due to under-reporting. Strict IPC precautions should be implemented across all healthcare settings and regularly audited, and surveillance systems strengthened and standardised to allow for comprehensive and consistent reporting of nosocomial transmission of hepatitis across the EU.

Hepatitis Virus C-associated Nephropathy: A Review and Update

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes hepatic and extrahepatic organ involvement. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent non-communicable disorder, accounting for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Acute kidney injury and CKD are not uncommon sequels of acute or chronic HCV infection.

The pathogenesis of HCV-associated kidney injuries is not well explored. Excess cryoglobulin production occurs in HCV infection. The cryoglobulin may initiate immune complex-mediated vasculitis, inducing vascular thrombosis and inflammation due to cryoglobulin deposits.

Furthermore, direct damage to nephron parts also occurs in HCV patients. Other contributory causes such as hypertension, diabetes, and genetic polymorphism enhance the risk of kidney damage in HCV-infected individuals. Implementing CKD prevention, regular evaluation, and therapy may improve the HCV burden of kidney damage and its related outcomes.

Therefore, in this review, we discuss and update the possible mechanism(s) of kidney injury pathogenesis with HCV infection. We searched for related published articles in EMBASE, Google Scholar, Google, PubMed, and Scopus. We used various texts and phrases, including hepatitis virus and kidney, HCV and CKD, kidney pathology in viral hepatitis, kidney transplantation in HCV-infected patients, kidney allograft survival in viral hepatitis patients, mechanism of kidney pathology in viral hepatitis, dialysis and viral hepatitis, HCV infection and kidney injuries, and viral hepatitis and CKD progression, etc. to identify relevant articles.

SARS-CoV-2 vs. Hepatitis Virus Infection Risk in the Hemodialysis Population: What Should We Expect?

Since the dramatic rise of the coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients receiving dialysis have emerged as especially susceptible to this infection because of their impaired immunologic state, chronic inflammation and the high incidence of comorbidities. Although several strategies have thus been implemented to minimize the risk of transmission and acquisition in this population worldwide, the reported severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence varies across studies but is higher than in the general population. On the contrary, the screening for hepatitis viruses (HBV and HCV) has seen significant improvements in recent years, with vaccination in the case of HBV and effective viral infection treatment for HCV. In this sense, a universal SARS-CoV-2 screening and contact precaution appear to be effective in preventing further transmission. Finally, regarding the progress, an international consensus with updated protocols that prioritize between old and new indicators would seem a reasonable tool to address these unexpended changes for the nephrology community.

Adjuvanted recombinant HBV vaccine (HBV-AS04) is effective over extended follow-up in dialysis population. An open-label non randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Patients on regular dialysis show a poor response to hepatitis B vaccine due to uremia. A recombinant HB vaccine (containing an improved adjuvant system AS04, HBV-AS04) has been licensed but the evidence on its efficacy and safety in dialysis population over the long term is extremely limited.

AIM

We have measured antibody (anti-HBs) persistence for up to 72 months in a large cohort of patients on long-term dialysis (with susceptibility to HBV infection) who underwent vaccination with HBV-AS04 vaccine.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited to receive four 20-mcg doses of HBV-AS04 by intramuscular route (deltoid muscle). Two vaccine schedules were adopted: 0,1,2, and 3 month (n=217 patients) and 0,1,2, and 6 month (n=31 patients). Anti-HBs antibody concentrations were tested at 1,2,3, 4, 7 and 12 months and then every year up to 72 months. Multivariate analysis was made to find the baseline parameters that were associated with the immune response to HBV-AS04 vaccine.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-two patients were included and 248 completed the study. At completion of vaccine schedule, the frequency of responders (anti-HBs titers≥10mIU/mL) was 81.5% (202/248) (mean anti-HBs antibody titers, 384.9±391.9mIU/mL), according to per-protocol analysis. On the grounds of univariate analysis, age was lower in responder than non- responder patients to HBV AS04 even if no statistical significance was achieved (P=0.09). The sero-protection rate at month 72 was 77% (7/9) (anti-HBs antibody titers, 184.9±360.1mIU/mL, P=0.001). Multivariate analysis found a relationship between sero-response rate and age (P=0.04). No major side effects and no de novo HBV episodes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our open-label nonrandomized trial performed in a 'real-world' practice showed the persistence of anti-HBs antibody among responder patients over a very long follow-up. Studies with longer observation periods are under way.

Hepatitis C in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Overview of the KDIGO Guideline

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a global health problem with significant health and economic burden, which can lead to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and affect multiple organ systems. In addition, prevalence of hepatitis C remains higher in patients with CKD, including those on chronic hemodialysis and in individuals with a kidney transplant than in the general population. There has been a dramatic shift in the management of hepatitis C since Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) published its 2008 guideline for the prevention, diagnosis and management of hepatitis C in CKD. As a result, KDIGO published in 2018 an update to this guideline. In this narrative review, we present a synopsis of the guideline, including recommendations for screening and detection of HCV in CKD, treatment of HCV in patients with CKD, treatment of HCV before and after kidney transplantation, prevention of HCV transmission in hemodialysis units, and treatment of kidney disease related to HCV infection. We focus on the clinical aspects of using direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with advanced CKD (G4 and G5), those on dialysis and kidney transplant recipients. We emphasize the importance of carefully managing drug-drug interactions between DAAs and immunosuppressive agents. We discuss timing of HCV treatment before vs. after kidney transplantation. Finally, we highlight areas of uncertainty where further research is needed before any definitive recommendations can be made.

A Systematic Review of the Current Hepatitis B Viral Infection and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Situation in Mediterranean Countries

Viral hepatitis B is a global public health problem affecting nearly two billion subjects; 3.3% of whom are from the WHO (World Health Organization) Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO). It induces both acute and chronic hepatic disorders with subsequent liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a considerable percentage of patients based on the age of exposure. In this review, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCC prevalence, distribution and prevalence of different genotypes, and male/female infection frequencies in relation to the vaccination status in the Mediterranean countries were reported. Study Design. This systematic review describes the prevalence of hepatitis B infection, genotype distribution of hepatitis B virus, and prevalence and incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in Mediterranean countries belonging to three different continents: Southern Europe (Spain, France, Italy, Croatia, and Greece), North Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt), and the Near East region (Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Israel, and Palestine). We tried to collect new data from electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, Google Scholar, and public health reports between 1980 and 2019. For each publication, we recorded reference, publication year, study characteristics (date, locations, sample size, and study population), and participant characteristics (population group, year, age, and sex). No language limitation was imposed, and articles or reports from non-peer-reviewed sources were not considered for this analysis. The main keywords were HBV prevalence, hepatitis B infection, HBV genotype, and HCC. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Healthy population-based studies included the following sample populations: (i) voluntary blood donors, (ii) pregnant women, (iii) community studies, (iv) hemodialysis patients, (v) hospitalized patients, (vi) healthcare workers, (vii) sex workers, (viii) drug abusers, and (ix) prisoners. We excluded studies from the following special groups who were assumed to be at a special high risk: patients from sexually transmitted disease clinics and thalassemia clinics and professional or paid blood donors.

New insights into the rational use of HCV+ organs worldwide

Hepatitis C (HCV) is a worldwide health problem. Effective therapies for HCV infection, coupled with an increase in deceased donors due to the opioid epidemic, have led to the broader availability and the use of HCV-infected donor organs, including HCV nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors in HCV-negative recipients. In this review, we discuss the prevalence of HCV infection, trends in the use of HCV-infected donors, and outcomes for those who receive HCV-seropositive or HCV NAT+ donor organs. We discuss management considerations such as hepatitis B reactivation, selection of the optimal direct-acting antiviral regimen, and potential complications. We also present a framework for the rational use of HCV-infected donor organs in the future.

Control of replication of hepatitis B and C virus improves patient and graft survival in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Before antiviral therapy, kidney transplant recipients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) had poor outcomes. Since the 90s, nucleos(t)ide analogues have been widely used in HBV-infected patients, while interferon-based therapy was rarely used in HCV-infected patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of HBV and HCV on patient and graft survival, according to viral replication status.

METHODS

Data from January 1993 to December 2010 were extracted from the French national database CRISTAL. A total of 31,433 kidney transplant recipients were included, of whom 575, 1,060 and 29,798 had chronic hepatitis B, C, or were not infected, respectively.

RESULTS

Ten-year survival was lower in HCV-infected (71.3%) than in HBV-infected (81.2%, p = 0.0004) or non-infected kidney transplant recipients (82.7%, p <0.0001). Ten-year kidney graft survival was lower in HCV-infected (50.6%) than in HBV-infected (62.3%, p <0.0001) or non-infected kidney transplant recipients (64.7%, p <0.0001). A random analysis of the medical records of 184 patients with HBV and 504 patients with HCV showed a control of viral replication in 94% and 35% of cases, respectively. Ten-year patient and graft survival in patients with detectable HCV RNA was lower than in their matching controls. Conversely, patients with HCV and undetectable HCV RNA had higher 10-year survival than their matched controls without significant differences in graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic HBV infection does not impact 10-year patient and kidney graft survival thanks to control of viral replication with nucleos(t)ide analogues. In kidney transplant recipients infected with HCV, patients with detectable RNA had worse outcomes, whereas the outcomes of those with undetectable RNA were at least as good as non-infected patients. Thus, direct-acting antivirals should be systematically offered to HCV-infected patients.

LAY SUMMARY

Previously, infections with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus led to poor outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. However, the outcomes of kidney transplants in patients with viral suppression are as good as those for kidney transplants in non-infected patients. Antiviral therapy should be systematically proposed to hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C-infected kidney transplant recipients or candidates to prevent the deleterious hepatic and extrahepatic impact of chronic viral replication. Recent access to direct-acting antivirals in patients with hepatitis C virus and renal dysfunction provides exciting new opportunities.

AISF position paper on HCV in immunocompromised patients

This report summarizes the clinical features and the indications for treating HCV infection in immunocompromised and transplanted patients in the Direct Acting Antiviral drugs era.

The epidemiology of HCV infection in patients with advanced CKD/ESRD: A global perspective

Liver disease in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is most commonly due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) and contributes to increased rates of mortality. Among the pre-dialysis population, the estimated prevalence of anti-HCV positivity is based on few, limited-size studies. In hemodialysis patients however, HCV remains very prevalent despite large declines in seropositivity rates in dialysis facilities in developed countries after preventive measures were adopted in the 1990s. Recent surveys indicate that the HCV seropositivity prevalence ranges from 1.4%-28.3%, and 4.7%-41.9%, among maintenance dialysis patients in developed and developing countries respectively. Although the full extent of dialysis unit-associated HCV transmission is unknown, outbreaks continue to occur, regardless of health system infrastucture. According to US Centers for Disease Control data, over 50% of health care-associated HCVoutbreaks reported from 2008 to 2015 occurred within dialysis facilities. Strict adherence to infection control procedures and routine serologic screening plays a pivotal role in preventing transmission of HCV within hemodialysis units, even in the setting of low HCV prevalence. With the advent of directly acting antivirals, cure of HCV-infected patients on maintenance hemodialysis will help reduce transmission within units and further lower the frequency of HCV infection.

Liver Iron Load Influences Hepatic Fat Fraction in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis: A Proof of Concept Study

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a spectrum of diseases including steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and end-stage liver failure. Hepatic iron accumulation has been linked to hepatic fibrosis severity in NASH and NAFLD. Iron overload induced by parenteral (IV) iron therapy is a potential clinical problem in dialysis patients. We analyzed the hypothetical triggering and aggravating role of iron on NAFLD in patients on dialysis.

Methods

Liver iron concentration (LIC) and hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) were analyzed prospectively in 68 dialysis patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Follow up of LIC and PDFF was performed in 17 dialysis patients during iron therapy.

Findings

PDFF differed significantly among dialysis patients classified according to LIC: patients with moderate or severe iron overload had increased fat fraction (PDFF: 7.9% (0.5–14.8%)) when compared to those with normal LIC (PDFF: 5% (0.27–11%)) or mild iron overload (PDFF: 5% (0.30–11.6%); P = 0.0049). PDFF correlated with LIC, and ferritin and body mass index. In seven patients monitored during IV iron therapy, LIC and PDFF increased concomitantly (PDFF: initial 2.5%, final 8%, P = 0.0156; LIC: initial 20 μmol/g, final 160 μmol/g: P = 0.0156), whereas in ten patients with iron overload, PDFF decreased after IV iron withdrawal or major dose reduction (initial: 8%, final: 4%; P = 0.0098) in parallel with LIC (initial: 195 μmol/g, final: 45 μmol/g; P = 0.002).

Interpretation

Liver iron load influences hepatic fat fraction in dialysis patients. Iron overload induced by iron therapy may aggravate or trigger NAFLD in dialysis patients.

Trial registration number (ISRCTN)

80100088.

Grazoprevir plus elbasvir in HCV genotype-1 or -4 infected patients with stage 4/5 severe chronic kidney disease is safe and effective

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who receive direct-acting antiviral drugs require special consideration regarding comorbid conditions. Here we assessed the efficacy and safety of grazoprevir plus elbasvir in 93 patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4 and with advanced chronic kidney disease in a non-randomized, multicenter, nationwide observational survey. Twenty patients with HCV genotype 1a, 51 patients with 1b, four unclassified genotype 1, 17 with genotype 4 and one with genotype 6 received grazoprevir plus elbasvir (100/50 mg) once daily. All patients had severe chronic kidney disease with 70 patients stage G5, including patients on hemodialysis (74.2%), and 23 were stage G4 chronic kidney disease. Severe liver disease (Metavir F3/F4) was found in 33 patients. A sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 87 of 90 patients. Two patients had a virologic breakthrough and one had a relapse after treatment withdrawal. Most patients received many concomitant medications (mean 7.7) related to comorbid conditions. Serious adverse events occurred in six patients, including three deaths while on grazoprevir plus elbasvir, not related to this therapy. Thus, once-daily grazoprevir plus elbasvir was highly effective with a low rate of adverse events in this advanced chronic kidney disease difficult-to-treat population with an HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection.