Damned if you do, damned if you don't: The evolving story of de novo and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma amongst those treated with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus

Hepatocellular metastasis recurrence in liver transplant after treatment with direct antiviral agents

Chronic HCV liver infection is considered one of the main causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For a selected group of patients, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) is the most effective option to cure both liver diseases. After liver transplantation, patients may be at risk of viral infection reactivation and HCC recurrence. HCV recurrence on the transplanted organ can lead to graft cirrhosis and therefore the clearance of virus with antiviral therapies has a pivotal role on the prevention of graft damage. Nowadays, direct antiviral agents (DAAs) represent the choice treatment for HCV recurrence in liver transplanted patients, ensuring high eradication rates. We present the case of a liver transplant recipient who developed, 7 years after OLTx and immediately after a DAAs treatment, a subcutaneous abdominal mass with histological characteristics of HCC.

HMGB1 and SEPP1 as predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with viral C hepatitis: Effect of DAAs

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are potential health problems. New directly acting antivirals (DAAs) changed HCV treatment strategies. Selenoprotein P1 (SEPP1) is a hepatokine implicated in HCC pathogenesis. High mobility group box1 (HMGB1), a nuclear DNA-binding protein, involved in immune and inflammatory responses in HCV and HCC. Therefore, the aim of current study was to investigate HMGB1 and SEPP1 levels in HCV and HCV + HCC patients and exploring DAAs effect on them.

METHODS

15 healthy volunteers, 25 HCV and 25 HCV + HCC patients were included. Liver function tests, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), SEPP1 and HMGB1 serum levels were evaluated. For HCV group blood samples before and after treatment with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir combination were collected.

RESULTS

HMGB1 was significantly higher in HCV + HCC group than in control and HCV groups (p < .05). SEPP1 decreased significantly in HCV and HCV + HCC groups compared to control group (p < .001). SEPP1 significantly elevated after treatment with DAAs (p = .001). HMGB1 and SEPP1 were negatively correlated with each other in HCV group (p = .047). Logistic regression analysis showed that HMGB1 and SEPP1 could be used as predictors for HCC in HCV infected patients (p = .02,p = .002) respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) revealed HMGB1 had 32% sensitivity and 100% specificity in differentiating HCV from HCV + HCC patients, both SEPP1 and HMGB1 had high sensitivity (92%,60%) and 93% specificity in differentiating healthy from HCV + HCC group.

CONCLUSION

HMGB1 and SEPP1 are involved in pathogenesis of HCV and HCV induced HCC. Both of them could serve as predictive biomarkers for HCC in HCV patients.