1
|
Moorhead AM, Amir LH, Crawford SB, Forster DA. Breastfeeding outcomes at 3 months for women with diabetes in pregnancy: Findings from the Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing randomized controlled trial. Birth 2024; 51:508-520. [PMID: 38193243 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with diabetes in pregnancy have decreased exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding compared with women without diabetes, and their infants are at increased risk of hypoglycemia. Clinicians often suggest pregnant women with diabetes to express breastmilk, and studies have reported increased breastfeeding exclusivity in the early postnatal period for patients who have expressed. Little is known about longer term outcomes. We investigated whether advising low-risk women with diabetes in pregnancy to express beginning at 36 weeks of pregnancy increased exclusivity and maintenance of breastfeeding at 3 months. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, two-group, randomized controlled trial at six hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between 2011 and 2015. Women were randomized to either standard maternity care or advised to hand express for 10 min twice daily, in addition to standard care. Women were telephoned at 12-13 weeks postpartum and asked a series of questions about feeding their baby, perceptions of their milk supply, and other health outcomes. RESULTS Of 631 women in the study, data for 570 (90%) were analyzed at 12-13 weeks. After adjustment, we found no evidence that women allocated to antenatal expressing were more likely to be giving only breastmilk (aRR 1.07 [95% CI 0.92-1.22]) or any breastmilk (aRR 0.99 [95% CI 0.92-1.06]) at 12-13 weeks postpartum compared with women in the standard care group. CONCLUSION While the practice of antenatal expression for low-risk women with diabetes during pregnancy is promising for increasing exclusivity of breastmilk feeding in hospital, at 12-13 weeks, there was no association with breastfeeding outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita M Moorhead
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa H Amir
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharinne B Crawford
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Della A Forster
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen S, Washio Y, Liu A, Acker C, Herrine G. Teaching antenatal hand expression: a feasibility study in an inner urban U.S. hospital. Int Breastfeed J 2023; 18:39. [PMID: 37563682 PMCID: PMC10416364 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-023-00578-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many women have low confidence in breastfeeding and have concerns regarding low milk volume or discomfort with breastfeeding. Antenatal hand expression may be an opportunity to help women feel more comfortable with breastfeeding and help promote exclusive breastfeeding. A study at a hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S. assessed the feasibility of teaching antenatal hand expression at 39 weeks among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, overall participant satisfaction and adoption of hand expression and breastfeeding. METHODS From March 2020 to June 2021, women recruited at 34-39 weeks were taught to hand express, collect, and store colostrum. Starting from 39 weeks, participants were asked to practice hand expression 1-3 times / day until delivery, log their experiences, and store colostrum expressed. Women were contacted to encourage continued hand expression and answer any questions. Postpartum, a survey assessed satisfaction with hand expression and issues encountered. The survey also inquired about breastfeeding plans and barriers, and whether women were exclusively breastfeeding (defined as infants who received only breastmilk from the time of birth). Chart review of postpartum or well-baby visit notes determined whether women continued breastfeeding. RESULTS Of the 29 participants, 72% (21/29) reported hand expressing at home, and no women reported contractions when hand expressing. Participants rated mean satisfaction of 8.1/10 (SD = 1.62) with antenatal hand expression, mean satisfaction of 9.4/10 (SD = 0.90) toward hand expression education, mean likelihood of 9.4/10 (SD = 1.24) recommending hand expression to others, and a mean score of 8.1/10 (SD = 1.69) on how helpful hand expression was in breastfeeding initiation. 90% (26/29) of women initiated breastfeeding after birth and 72% (21/29) exclusively breastfed on discharge, but only 11/29 (38%) continued exclusively breastfeeding when re-assessed 4-6 weeks postpartum. Barriers included maternal discomfort, low milk supply, and maternal or infant illness. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that women in an urban setting would be willing to practice antenatal hand expression. A larger and adequately powered study could be feasible to determine associations between antenatal hand expression and breastfeeding rates and confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Chen
- Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Yukiko Washio
- Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA USA
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC USA
| | - Angela Liu
- Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | | | - Gail Herrine
- Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demirci JR, Glasser M, Bogen DL, Sereika SM, Ren D, Ray K, Bodnar LM, O'Sullivan TA, Himes K. Effect of antenatal milk expression education on lactation outcomes in birthing people with pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥25: protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Int Breastfeed J 2023; 18:16. [PMID: 36927811 PMCID: PMC10019405 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-023-00552-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Birthing people with pre-pregnancy body mass indices (BMIs) ≥ 25 kg/m2, particularly those without prior breastfeeding experience, are at increased risk for suboptimal lactation outcomes. Antenatal milk expression (AME) may be one way to counteract the negative effects of early infant formula supplementation common in this population. METHODS This ongoing, randomized controlled trial in the United States evaluates the efficacy of a telelactation-delivered AME education intervention versus an attention control condition on lactation outcomes to 1 year postpartum among 280 nulliparous-to-primiparous, non-diabetic birthing people with pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. The assigned study treatment is delivered via four weekly online video consultations between gestational weeks 37-40. Participants assigned to AME meet with study personnel and a lactation consultant to learn and practice AME. Instructions are provided for home practice of AME between study visits. Control group participants view videos on infant care/development at study visits. Participants complete emailed surveys at enrollment (340/7-366/7 gestational weeks) and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum. Surveys assess lactation and infant feeding practices; breastfeeding self-efficacy, attitudes, and satisfaction; perception of insufficient milk; onset of lactogenesis-II; lactation support and problems; and reasons for breastfeeding cessation. Surveys also assess factors associated with lactation outcomes, including demographic characteristics, health problems, birth trauma, racial discrimination, and weight stigma. Health information and infant feeding data are abstracted from the pregnancy and birth center electronic health record. Milk samples are collected from the intervention group at each study visit and from both groups at each postpartum follow-up for future analyses. Qualitative interviews are conducted at 6 weeks postpartum to understand AME experiences. Primary outcomes of interest are breastfeeding exclusivity and breastfeeding self-efficacy scores at 2 weeks postpartum. Outcomes will be examined longitudinally with generalized linear mixed-effects modeling. DISCUSSION This is the first adequately powered trial evaluating the effectiveness of AME among U.S. birthing people and within a non-diabetic population with pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. This study will also provide the first evidence of acceptability and effectiveness of telelactation-delivered AME. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258709.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill R Demirci
- Department of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Melissa Glasser
- Department of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Debra L Bogen
- Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susan M Sereika
- Department of Health & Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dianxu Ren
- Department of Health & Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kristin Ray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,UPMC Children's Community Pediatrics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lisa M Bodnar
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Therese A O'Sullivan
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Katherine Himes
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sobik S, Crimmins M, Hand M, Blake L, Andres A. Education and Experiences of Antenatal Breast Milk Expression: A Systematic Review. Breastfeed Med 2023; 18:107-115. [PMID: 36724491 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding rates have stagnated recently despite recommendations to breastfeed until age 2 years. Antenatal breast milk expression (ABME) is a method used to prepare the breast for breastfeeding. However, there is limited evidence available on the benefits, risks, and impact of ABME on maternal-infant breastfeeding dyads. Methods: This review identified and summarized studies on women who engaged in ABME and their personal experiences. Databases searched included PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EMBASE. Initially, abstracts and titles were reviewed, and then, full-text studies were screened for inclusion by two blinded authors. Two authors assessed the quality of the studies using a standardized tool, two authors completed data extraction, and one author completed data harmonization into tables. Results: A total of 1,410 studies were identified (after duplicates removed) and 10 citations qualified for the inclusion criteria. Only two studies received an overall rating of strong quality and low-risk bias. The selected articles varied in primary outcomes; however, main focuses were experiences, knowledge, and perspective after practicing ABME. Data varied on timing of ABME, but most studies started between 34 and 36 weeks. The average amount of expressed milk was reported in four studies but was variable. Conclusions: This systematic review found that the literature is limited regarding ABME, and most studies were focused on women with diabetes. The current limited evidence suggests that ABME may be a helpful tool in improving maternal breastfeeding confidence and breastfeeding outcomes. Negative side effects reported related to ABME included difficulty learning the technique, discomfort, and feeling of awkwardness while expressing. Future research should focus on higher quality studies regarding use of ABME, proper teaching of ABME technique, and the use of ABME to improve breastfeeding outcomes in diverse populations of maternal-infant dyads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Sobik
- Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Meghan Crimmins
- Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Graduate Program in Interdisciplinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Megan Hand
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Lindsay Blake
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Aline Andres
- Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Demirci JR, Glasser M, Himes KP, Sereika SM. Structured antenatal milk expression education for nulliparous pregnant people: results of a pilot, randomized controlled trial in the United States. Int Breastfeed J 2022; 17:50. [PMID: 35799299 PMCID: PMC9261047 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-022-00491-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand-expression, collection, and storage of breast milk during pregnancy (i.e., antenatal milk expression or AME) is a safe, potentially effective practice to reduce early, undesired infant formula supplementation among women with diabetes. The feasibility and potential impact of AME on lactation outcomes in the United States (U.S.) and among non-diabetic birthing people is unknown. METHODS The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a structured AME intervention among nulliparous birthing people in the United States. We recruited 45 low-risk, nulliparous individuals at 34-366/7 weeks of gestation from a hospital-based midwife practice. Participants were randomized to AME or a control group receiving lactation education handouts. Interventions were delivered at weekly visits at 37-40 weeks of pregnancy. The AME intervention involved technique demonstration and feedback from a lactation consultant and daily independent practice. Lactation outcomes were assessed during the postpartum hospitalization, 1-2 weeks postpartum, and 3-4 months postpartum. RESULTS Between December 2016 and February 2018, 63 individuals were approached and screened for eligibility, and 45 enrolled into the study (71%). Of 22 participants assigned to AME, 18 completed at least one AME study visit. Participants reported practicing AME on at least 60% of days prior to their infant's birth. Most were able to express milk antenatally (15/18), more than half collected and froze antenatal milk (11/18), and 39% (7/18) supplemented their infants with antenatal milk after birth. No major problems were reported with AME. Perinatal and lactation outcomes, including infant gestational age at birth, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, delayed onset of lactogenesis II, and use of infant formula were similar between AME and control groups. Among participants in both groups who were feeding any breast milk at each assessment, breastfeeding self-efficacy increased and perceptions of insufficient milk decreased over the postpartum course. CONCLUSIONS In a small group of nulliparous birthing people in the U.S., AME education and independent practice beginning at 37 weeks of pregnancy was feasible. In some cases, AME provided a back-up supply of milk when supplementation was indicated or desired. The relationship between AME and lactation outcomes requires further study with adequately powered samples. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 11, 2021 under the following registration ID: NCT04929301. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04929301 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill R Demirci
- Department of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Melissa Glasser
- Department of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Katherine P Himes
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Susan M Sereika
- Department of Health & Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moorhead AM, Amir LH, Forster DA, Crawford SB. 'Is there any point in me doing this?' Views and experiences of women in the Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing (DAME) trial. MATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION 2022; 18:e13307. [PMID: 34939318 PMCID: PMC8932693 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing (DAME) randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 2011–2015, at six sites in Melbourne, Australia to explore the effect of advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breast milk from 36 weeks gestation. Infants whose mothers were randomised to express in pregnancy were more likely to be exclusively breast milk fed during their hospital stay, and there was no evidence of harm. This paper explores women's views and experiences of antenatal expressing. In this two‐arm RCT, 635 women with diabetes in pregnancy who were otherwise of low medical risk were randomised at 36–37 weeks gestation to usual care (not expressing, n = 316), or the intervention, where women were advised to hand express for 10 min twice daily until birth (n = 319). Semistructured face‐to‐face interviews were conducted with 10 women who expressed antenatally. They were asked about their experiences of antenatal expressing, including how they felt about the overall experience, the amount of breast milk they expressed, making time to express, and their experience of breastfeeding. Thematic analysis of the in‐depth interviews identified six themes: (1) learning and adapting expressing, (2) feelings and sensations associated with expressing, (3) support, (4) dis/empowerment, (5) health, and (6) the value of breast milk. Women had both positive and negative experiences of antenatal expressing. If health professionals are advising antenatal expressing to women, it is important they understand the range of outcomes and experiences. Women's experiences of antenatal expressing were both positive and negative; it is important to understand the range of experiences. Women should be advised that some women express little or no breast milk antenatally and therefore be reassured if they are concerned. For women with diabetes in pregnancy, their diabetes management is a significant time burden, and should be considered when discussing antenatal expressing with women. Maternity care providers need to follow‐up with pregnant women advised to express, to provide education, reassurance, and reassess expressing techniques. Maternity care providers need to manage and prioritise the use of expressed breast milk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita M Moorhead
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,Midwifery and Maternity Services Research, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa H Amir
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,Midwifery and Maternity Services Research, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Della A Forster
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,Midwifery and Maternity Services Research, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharinne B Crawford
- Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|