Genomic and phenotypic effects of inbreeding across two different hatchery management regimes in Chinook salmon

Sex-specific effects of inbreeding in juvenile brown trout

Inbreeding depression, that is, the reduction of health and vigour in individuals with high inbreeding coefficients, is expected to increase with environmental, social, or physiological stress. It has therefore been predicted that sexual selection and the associated stress usually lead to higher inbreeding depression in males than in females. However, sex-specific differences in life history may reverse that pattern during certain developmental stages. In some salmonids, for example, female juveniles start developing their gonads earlier than males who instead grow faster. We tested whether the sexes are differently affected by inbreeding during that time. To study the effects of inbreeding coefficients that may be typical for natural populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta), and also to control for potentially confounding maternal or paternal effects, we sampled males and females from the wild, used their gametes in a block-wise full-factorial breeding design to produce 60 full-sib families, released the offspring as yolk-sac larvae into the wild, sampled them 6 months later, identified their genetic sex, and used microsatellites to assign them to their parents. We used whole-genome resequencing to calculate the kinship coefficients for each breeding pair and hence the expected average inbreeding coefficient per family. Juvenile growth could be predicted from these expected inbreeding coefficients and the genetic sex: Females reached lower body sizes with increasing inbreeding coefficient, while no such link could be found in males. This sex-specific inbreeding depression led to the overall pattern that females were on average smaller than males by the end of their first summer.

Temporal and region‐specific variations in genome‐wide inbreeding effects on female size and reproduction traits of rainbow trout

Recent studies have shown that current levels of inbreeding, estimated by runs of homozygosity (ROH), are moderate to high in farmed rainbow trout lines. Based on ROH metrics, the aims of our study were to (i) quantify inbreeding effects on female size (postspawning body weight, fork length) and reproduction traits (spawning date, coelomic fluid weight, spawn weight, egg number, average egg weight) in rainbow trout, and (ii) identify both the genomic regions and inbreeding events affecting performance. We analysed the performance of 1346 females under linear animal models including random additive and dominance genetics effects, with fixed covariates accounting for inbreeding effects at different temporal and genomic scales. A significant effect of genome‐wide inbreeding (F) was only observed for spawning date and egg weight, with performance variations of +12.3% and −3.8%, respectively, for 0.1 unit increase in F level. At different local genomic scales, we observed highly variable inbreeding effects on the seven traits under study, ranging from increasing to decreasing trait values. As widely reported in the literature, the main scenario observed during this study was a negative impact of recent inbreeding. However, other scenarios such as positive effects of recent inbreeding or negative impacts of old inbreeding were also observed. Although partial dominance appeared to be the main hypothesis explaining inbreeding depression for all the traits studied, the overdominance hypothesis might also play a significant role in inbreeding depression affecting fecundity (egg number and mass) traits in rainbow trout. These findings suggest that region‐specific inbreeding can strongly impact performance without necessarily observing genome‐wide inbreeding effects. They shed light on the genetic architecture of inbreeding depression and its evolution along the genome over time. The use of region‐specific metrics may enable breeders to more accurately manage the trade‐off between genetic merit and the undesirable side effects associated with inbreeding.

Rapid adaptation through genomic and epigenomic responses following translocations in an endangered salmonid

Identifying the molecular mechanisms facilitating adaptation to new environments is a key question in evolutionary biology, especially in the face of current rapid and human-induced changes. Translocations have become an important tool for species conservation, but the attendant small population sizes and new ecological pressures might affect phenotypic and genotypic variation and trajectories dramatically and in unknown ways. In Scotland, the European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) is native to only two lakes and vulnerable to extirpation. Six new refuge populations were established over the last 30 years as a conservation measure. In this study, we examined whether there is a predictable ecological and evolutionary response of these fishes to translocation. We found eco-morphological differences, as functional traits relating to body shape differed between source and refuge populations. Dual isotopic analyses suggested some ecological release, with the diets in refuge populations being more diverse than in source populations. Analyses of up to 9117 genome-mapped SNPs showed that refuge populations had reduced genetic diversity and elevated inbreeding and relatedness relative to source populations, though genomic differentiation was low (F ST = 0.002-0.030). We identified 14 genomic SNPs that showed shared signals of a selective response to translocations, including some located near or within genes involved in the immune system, nervous system and hepatic functions. Analysis of up to 120,897 epigenomic loci identified a component of consistent differential methylation between source and refuge populations. We found that epigenomic variation and genomic variation were associated with morphological variation, but we were not able to infer an effect of population age because the patterns were also linked with the methodology of the translocations. These results show that conservation-driven translocations affect evolutionary potential by impacting eco-morphological, genomic and epigenomic components of diversity, shedding light on acclimation and adaptation process in these contexts.

Implications of size-selective fisheries on sexual selection

Fisheries often combine high mortality with intensive size selectivity and can, thus, be expected to reduce body size and size variability in exploited populations. In many fish species, body size is a sexually selected trait and plays an important role in mate choice and mate competition. Large individuals are often preferred as mates due to the high fecundity and resources they can provide to developing offspring. Large fish are also successful in competition for mates. Fisheries‐induced reductions in size and size variability can potentially disrupt mating systems and lower average reproductive success by decreasing opportunities for sexual selection. By reducing population sizes, fisheries can also lead to an increased level of inbreeding. Some fish species avoid reproducing with kin, and a high level of relatedness in a population can further disrupt mating systems. Reduced body size and size variability can force fish to change their mate preferences or reduce their choosiness. If mate preference is genetically determined, the adaptive response to fisheries‐induced changes in size and size variability might not occur rapidly. However, much evidence exists for plastic adjustments of mate choice, suggesting that fish might respond flexibly to changes in their social environment. Here, I first discuss how reduced average body size and size variability in exploited populations might affect mate choice and mate competition. I then consider the effects of sex‐biased fisheries on mating systems. Finally, I contemplate the possible effects of inbreeding on mate choice and reproductive success and discuss how mate choice might evolve in exploited populations. Currently, little is known about the mating systems of nonmodel species and about the interplay between size‐selective fisheries and sexual selection. Future studies should focus on how reduced size and size variability and increased inbreeding affect fish mating systems, how persistent these effects are, and how this might in turn affect population demography.