CsrA regulation via binding to the base-pairing small RNA Spot 42

Multitier regulation of the E. coli extreme acid stress response by CsrA

CsrA is an RNA-binding protein that regulates processes critical for growth and survival, including central carbon metabolism, motility, biofilm formation, stress responses, and expression of virulence factors in pathogens. Transcriptomics studies in Escherichia coli suggested that CsrA repressed genes involved in surviving extremely acidic conditions. Here, we examine the effects of disrupting CsrA-dependent regulation on the expression of genes and circuitry for acid stress survival and demonstrate CsrA-mediated repression at multiple levels. We show that this repression is critical for managing the trade-off between growth and survival; overexpression of acid stress genes caused by csrA disruption enhances survival under extreme acidity but is detrimental for growth under mildly acidic conditions. In vitro studies confirmed that CsrA binds specifically to mRNAs of structural and regulatory genes for acid stress survival, causing translational repression. We also found that translation of the top-tier acid stress regulator, evgA, is coupled to that of a small leader peptide, evgL, which is repressed by CsrA. Unlike dedicated acid stress response genes, csrA and its sRNA antagonists, csrB and csrC, did not exhibit a substantial response to acid shock. Furthermore, disruption of CsrA regulation of acid stress genes impacted host-microbe interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans, alleviating GABA deficiencies. This study expands the known regulon of CsrA to genes of the extreme acid stress response of E. coli and highlights a new facet of the global role played by CsrA in balancing the opposing physiological demands of stress resistance with the capacity for growth and modulating host interactions.IMPORTANCETo colonize/infect the mammalian intestinal tract, bacteria must survive exposure to the extreme acidity of the stomach. E. coli does this by expressing proteins that neutralize cytoplasmic acidity and cope with molecular damage caused by low pH. Because of the metabolic cost of these processes, genes for surviving acid stress are tightly regulated. Here, we show that CsrA negatively regulates the cascade of expression responsible for the acid stress response. Increased expression of acid response genes due to csrA disruption improved survival at extremely low pH but inhibited growth under mildly acidic conditions. Our findings define a new layer of regulation in the acid stress response of E. coli and a novel physiological function for CsrA.

Improved RNA stability estimation through Bayesian modeling reveals most Salmonella transcripts have subminute half-lives

RNA decay is a crucial mechanism for regulating gene expression in response to environmental stresses. In bacteria, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are known to be involved in posttranscriptional regulation, but their global impact on RNA half-lives has not been extensively studied. To shed light on the role of the major RBPs ProQ and CspC/E in maintaining RNA stability, we performed RNA sequencing of Salmonella enterica over a time course following treatment with the transcription initiation inhibitor rifampicin (RIF-seq) in the presence and absence of these RBPs. We developed a hierarchical Bayesian model that corrects for confounding factors in rifampicin RNA stability assays and enables us to identify differentially decaying transcripts transcriptome-wide. Our analysis revealed that the median RNA half-life in Salmonella in early stationary phase is less than 1 min, a third of previous estimates. We found that over half of the 500 most long-lived transcripts are bound by at least one major RBP, suggesting a general role for RBPs in shaping the transcriptome. Integrating differential stability estimates with cross-linking and immunoprecipitation followed by RNA sequencing (CLIP-seq) revealed that approximately 30% of transcripts with ProQ binding sites and more than 40% with CspC/E binding sites in coding or 3' untranslated regions decay differentially in the absence of the respective RBP. Analysis of differentially destabilized transcripts identified a role for ProQ in the oxidative stress response. Our findings provide insights into posttranscriptional regulation by ProQ and CspC/E, and the importance of RBPs in regulating gene expression.

The Post-Transcriptional Regulatory Protein CsrA Amplifies Its Targetome through Direct Interactions with Stress-Response Regulatory Hubs: The EvgA and AcnA Cases

Global rewiring of bacterial gene expressions in response to environmental cues is mediated by regulatory proteins such as the CsrA global regulator from E. coli. Several direct mRNA and sRNA targets of this protein have been identified; however, high-throughput studies suggest an expanded RNA targetome for this protein. In this work, we demonstrate that CsrA can extend its network by directly binding and regulating the evgA and acnA transcripts, encoding for regulatory proteins. CsrA represses EvgA and AcnA expression and disrupting the CsrA binding sites of evgA and acnA, results in broader gene expression changes to stress response networks. Specifically, altering CsrA-evgA binding impacts the genes related to acidic stress adaptation, and disrupting the CsrA-acnA interaction affects the genes involved in metal-induced oxidative stress responses. We show that these interactions are biologically relevant, as evidenced by the improved tolerance of evgA and acnA genomic mutants depleted of CsrA binding sites when challenged with acid and metal ions, respectively. We conclude that EvgA and AcnA are intermediate regulatory hubs through which CsrA can expand its regulatory role. The indirect CsrA regulation of gene networks coordinated by EvgA and AcnA likely contributes to optimizing cellular resources to promote exponential growth in the absence of stress.

Recent insights into the world of dual-function bacterial sRNAs

Dual-function sRNAs refer to a small subgroup of small regulatory RNAs that merges base-pairing properties of antisense RNAs with peptide-encoding properties of mRNA. Both functions can be part of either same or in another metabolic pathway. Here, we want to update the knowledge of to the already known dual-function sRNAs and review the six new sRNAs found since 2017 regarding their structure, functional mechanisms, evolutionary conservation, and role in the regulation of distinct biological/physiological processes. The increasing identification of dual-function sRNAs through bioinformatics approaches, RNomics and RNA-sequencing and the associated increase in regulatory understanding will likely continue to increase at the same rate in the future. This may improve our understanding of the physiology, virulence and resistance of bacteria, as well as enable their use in technical applications. This article is categorized under: Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Regulatory RNAs.

CsrA selectively modulates sRNA-mRNA regulator outcomes

Post-transcriptional regulation, by small RNAs (sRNAs) as well as the global Carbon Storage Regulator A (CsrA) protein, play critical roles in bacterial metabolic control and stress responses. The CsrA protein affects selective sRNA-mRNA networks, in addition to regulating transcription factors and sigma factors, providing additional avenues of cross talk between other stress-response regulators. Here, we expand the known set of sRNA-CsrA interactions and study their regulatory effects. In vitro binding assays confirm novel CsrA interactions with ten sRNAs, many of which are previously recognized as key regulatory nodes. Of those 10 sRNA, we identify that McaS, FnrS, SgrS, MicL, and Spot42 interact directly with CsrA in vivo. We find that the presence of CsrA impacts the downstream regulation of mRNA targets of the respective sRNA. In vivo evidence supports enhanced CsrA McaS-csgD mRNA repression and showcases CsrA-dependent repression of the fucP mRNA via the Spot42 sRNA. We additionally identify SgrS and FnrS as potential new sRNA sponges of CsrA. Overall, our results further support the expanding impact of the Csr system on cellular physiology via CsrA impact on the regulatory roles of these sRNAs.

CsrA coordinates the expression of ribosome hibernation and anti-σ factor proteins

Bacterial growth rate varies due to changing physiological signals and is fundamentally dependent on protein synthesis. Consequently, cells alter their transcription and translation machinery to optimize the capacity for protein production under varying conditions and growth rates. Our findings demonstrate that the post-transcriptional regulator CsrA in Escherichia coli controls the expression of genes that participate in these processes. During exponential growth, CsrA represses the expression of proteins that alter or inhibit RNA polymerase (RNAP) and ribosome activity, including the ribosome hibernation factors RMF, RaiA, YqjD, ElaB, YgaM, and SRA, as well as the anti-σ70 factor, Rsd. Upon entry into the stationary phase, RaiA, YqjD, ElaB, and SRA expression was derepressed and that of RMF, YgaM, and Rsd was activated in the presence of CsrA. This pattern of gene expression likely supports global protein expression during active growth and helps limit protein production to a basal level when nutrients are limited. In addition, we identified genes encoding the paralogous C-tail anchored inner membrane proteins YqjD and ElaB as robust, direct targets of CsrA-mediated translational repression. These proteins bind ribosomes and mediate their localization to the inner cell membrane, impacting a variety of processes including protein expression and membrane integrity. Previous studies found that YqjD overexpression inhibits cell growth, suggesting that appropriate regulation of YqjD expression might play a key role in cell viability. CsrA-mediated regulation of yqjD and ribosome hibernation factors reveals a new role for CsrA in appropriating cellular resources for optimum growth under varying conditions.IMPORTANCEThe Csr/Rsm system (carbon storage regulator or repressor of stationary phase metabolites) is a global post-transcriptional regulatory system that coordinates and responds to environmental cues and signals, facilitating the transition between active growth and stationary phase. Another key determinant of bacterial lifestyle decisions is the management of the cellular gene expression machinery. Here, we investigate the connection between these two processes in Escherichia coli. Disrupted regulation of the transcription and translation machinery impacts many cellular functions, including gene expression, growth, fitness, and stress resistance. Elucidating the role of the Csr system in controlling the activity of RNAP and ribosomes advances our understanding of mechanisms controlling bacterial growth. A more complete understanding of these processes could lead to the improvement of therapeutic strategies for recalcitrant infections.

How Bacterial Pathogens Coordinate Appetite with Virulence

Cells adjust growth and metabolism to nutrient availability. Having access to a variety of carbon sources during infection of their animal hosts, facultative intracellular pathogens must efficiently prioritize carbon utilization. Here, we discuss how carbon source controls bacterial virulence, with an emphasis on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, which causes gastroenteritis in immunocompetent humans and a typhoid-like disease in mice, and propose that virulence factors can regulate carbon source prioritization by modifying cellular physiology. On the one hand, bacterial regulators of carbon metabolism control virulence programs, indicating that pathogenic traits appear in response to carbon source availability. On the other hand, signals controlling virulence regulators may impact carbon source utilization, suggesting that stimuli that bacterial pathogens experience within the host can directly impinge on carbon source prioritization. In addition, pathogen-triggered intestinal inflammation can disrupt the gut microbiota and thus the availability of carbon sources. By coordinating virulence factors with carbon utilization determinants, pathogens adopt metabolic pathways that may not be the most energy efficient because such pathways promote resistance to antimicrobial agents and also because host-imposed deprivation of specific nutrients may hinder the operation of certain pathways. We propose that metabolic prioritization by bacteria underlies the pathogenic outcome of an infection.

Small RNAs, Large Networks: Posttranscriptional Regulons in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Small regulatory RNA (sRNAs) are key mediators of posttranscriptional gene control in bacteria. Assisted by RNA-binding proteins, a single sRNA often modulates the expression of dozens of genes, and thus sRNAs frequently adopt central roles in regulatory networks. Posttranscriptional regulation by sRNAs comes with several unique features that cannot be achieved by transcriptional regulators. However, for optimal network performance, transcriptional and posttranscriptional control mechanisms typically go hand-in-hand. This view is reflected by the ever-growing class of mixed network motifs involving sRNAs and transcription factors, which are ubiquitous in biology and whose regulatory properties we are beginning to understand. In addition, sRNA activity can be antagonized by base-pairing with sponge RNAs, adding yet another layer of complexity to these networks. In this article, we summarize the regulatory concepts underlying sRNA-mediated gene control in bacteria and discuss how sRNAs shape the output of a network, focusing on several key examples.

Little reason to call them small noncoding RNAs

Hundreds of different species of small RNAs can populate a bacterial cell. This small transcriptome contains important information for the adaptation of cellular physiology to environmental changes. Underlying cellular networks involving small RNAs are RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions, which are often intertwined. In addition, small RNAs can function as mRNAs. In general, small RNAs are referred to as noncoding because very few are known to contain translated open reading frames. In this article, we intend to highlight that the number of small RNAs that fall within the set of translated RNAs is bound to increase. In addition, we aim to emphasize that the dynamics of the small transcriptome involve different functional codes, not just the genetic code. Therefore, since the role of small RNAs is always code-driven, we believe that there is little reason to continue calling them small noncoding RNAs.

Spatiotemporal regulation of the BarA/UvrY two-component signaling system

The BarA/UvrY two-component signal transduction system mediates adaptive responses of Escherichia coli to changes in growth stage. At late exponential growth phase, the BarA sensor kinase auto-phosphorylates and transphosphorylates UvrY, which activates transcription of the CsrB and CsrC noncoding RNAs. CsrB and CsrC, in turn, sequester and antagonize the RNA binding protein CsrA, which post-transcriptionally regulates translation and/or stability of its target mRNAs. Here, we provide evidence that, during stationary phase of growth, the HflKC complex recruits BarA to the poles of the cells, and silences its kinase activity. Moreover, we show that, during the exponential phase of growth, CsrA inhibits hflK and hflC expression, thereby enabling BarA activation upon encountering its stimulus. Thus, in addition to temporal control of BarA activity, spatial regulation is demonstrated.

CsrA Shows Selective Regulation of sRNA-mRNA Networks

Post-transcriptional regulation, by small RNAs (sRNAs) as well as the global Carbon Storage Regulator A (CsrA) protein, play critical roles in bacterial metabolic control and stress responses. The CsrA protein affects selective sRNA-mRNA networks, in addition to regulating transcription factors and sigma factors, providing additional avenues of cross talk between other stress-response regulators. Here, we expand the known set of sRNA-CsrA interactions and study their regulatory effects. In vitro binding assays confirm novel CsrA interactions with ten sRNAs, many of which are previously recognized as key regulatory nodes. Of those 10 sRNA, we identify that McaS, FnrS, SgrS, MicL, and Spot42 interact with CsrA in vivo. We find that the presence of CsrA impacts the downstream regulation of mRNA targets of the respective sRNA. In vivo evidence supports enhanced CsrA McaS-csgD mRNA repression and showcase CsrA-dependent repression of the fucP mRNA via the Spot42 sRNA. We additionally identify SgrS and FnrS as potential new sRNA sponges of CsrA. Overall, our results further support the expanding impact of the Csr system on cellular physiology via CsrA impact on the regulatory roles of these sRNAs.

Dual-function Spot 42 RNA encodes a 15-amino acid protein that regulates the CRP transcription factor

SignificanceDual-function RNAs base pair with target messenger RNAs as small regulatory RNAs and encode small protein regulators. However, only a limited number of these dual-function regulators have been identified. In this study, we show that a well-characterized base-pairing small RNA surprisingly also encodes a 15-amino acid protein. The very small protein binds the cyclic adenosine monophosphate receptor protein transcription factor to block activation of some promoters, raising the question of how many other transcription factors are modulated by unidentified small proteins.

Bacterial RNA chaperones and chaperone-like riboregulators: behind the scenes of RNA-mediated regulation of cellular metabolism

In all domains of life, RNA chaperones safeguard and guide the fate of the cellular RNA pool. RNA chaperones comprise structurally diverse proteins that ensure proper folding, stability, and ribonuclease resistance of RNA, and they support regulatory activities mediated by RNA. RNA chaperones constitute a topologically diverse group of proteins that often present an unstructured region and bind RNA with limited nucleotide sequence preferences. In bacteria, three main proteins - Hfq, ProQ, and CsrA - have been shown to regulate numerous complex processes, including bacterial growth, stress response and virulence. Hfq and ProQ have well-studied activities as global chaperones with pleiotropic impact, while CsrA has a chaperone-like role with more defined riboregulatory function. Here, we describe relevant novel insights into their common features, including RNA binding properties, unstructured domains, and interplay with other proteins important to RNA metabolism.

RelA binding of mRNAs modulates translation or sRNA-mRNA basepairing depending on the position of the GGAG site

Previously, we reported that RelA protein facilitates Hfq-mediated mRNA-sRNA regulation by binding sRNAs carrying a Shine-Dalgarno-like GGAG sequence. In turn, sRNA-Hfq monomers are stabilized, enabling the attachment of more Hfq subunits to form a functional hexamer. Here, using CLIP-seq, we present a global analysis of RelA-bound RNAs showing that RelA interacts with sRNAs as well as with mRNAs carrying a GGAG motif. RelA binding of mRNAs carrying GGAG at position -7 relative to the initiation codon (AUG) inhibits translation by interfering with the binding of 30S ribosomes. The extent of inhibition depends on the distance of GGAG relative to the AUG, as shortening the spacing between GGAG and AUG abrogates RelA-mediated inhibition. Interestingly, RelA binding of target mRNAs carrying GGAG in the coding sequence or close to AUG facilitates target gene regulation by sRNA partners that lack GGAG. However, translation inhibition caused by RelA binding of mRNAs carrying GGAG at position -7 relative to the AUG renders sRNA-mRNA basepairing regulation ineffective. Our study indicates that by binding RNAs carrying GGAG the ribosome-associated RelA protein inhibits translation of specific newly synthesized incoming mRNAs or enables basepairing regulation by their respective sRNA partners, thereby introducing a new regulatory concept for the bacterial response.

CsrA enters Hfq's territory: Regulation of a base-pairing small RNA

Post-transcriptional regulatory networks in Gammaproteobacteria are to a large extent built around the two globally acting RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) CsrA and Hfq. Both RBPs interact with small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), but the functional outcomes of these interactions are generally distinct. Whereas Hfq both stabilizes sRNAs and promotes their base-pairing to target mRNAs, the sRNAs bound by CsrA act as sequestering molecules that titrate the RBP away from its mRNA targets. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Lai et al. reveal that CsrA interacts with the Hfq-associated and base-pairing sRNA Spot 42. In this case, CsrA increases Spot 42 stability by masking a cleavage site for endoribonuclease RNase E, thereby promoting Spot 42-dependent regulation of srlA mRNA. Interestingly, the effect of CsrA on srlA expression is two-fold. In addition to affecting Spot 42-dependent regulation, CsrA directly inhibits translation of SrlM, an activator of srlA transcription. Together, this study reveals a new function for CsrA and indicates more intricate connections between the CsrA and Hfq networks than previously anticipated. Several recent studies have identified additional RBPs that interact with sRNAs. With new RBP identification methods at hand, it will be intriguing to see how many more sRNA-binding proteins will be uncovered.