1
|
Poulopoulou A, Sidiropoulou A, Sarmourli T, Zachrou E, Michailidou C, Zarras C, Vagdatli E, Massa E, Mouloudi E, Pyrpasopoulou A, Meletis G, Protonotariou E, Skoura L, Metallidis S, Karampatakis T, Katsifa E, Nikopoulou A, Louka A, Rizou A, Arvaniti K, Kouvelis V, Borman A, Roilides E, Vyzantiadis TA. Candida auris: Outbreak, surveillance and epidemiological monitoring in Northern Greece. Med Mycol 2024; 62:myae062. [PMID: 38877671 PMCID: PMC11232515 DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myae062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen associated with multi-drug resistance rates and widespread outbreaks in hospitals and healthcare units worldwide. Sequencing studies have revealed that different clonal lineages of the fungus seem to be prevalent among distinct geographical sites. The first case of C. auris in Northern Greece was reported in Thessaloniki in October 2022, almost 2 years after the first isolation in Greece (Athens 2019). The Mycology Laboratory of the Medical School of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki stands as the reference laboratory for fungal diseases in Northern Greece and a meticulous search for the yeast, in plenty of suspicious samples, has been run since 2019 in the Lab as well as a retrospective analysis of all its yeasts' collection, back to 2008, with negative results for the presence of C. auris. Here, are presented the findings concerning the outbreak and surveillance of C. auris in Northern Greece, mainly the region of Thessaloniki and the broader area of Macedonia, from October 2022 until August 2023. The isolates from Northern Greece continue to fall in Clade I and present with an almost equal and stable sensitivity profile until now.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterina Poulopoulou
- Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece
| | - Anna Sidiropoulou
- Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece
| | - Theopisti Sarmourli
- Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece
| | - Evaggelia Zachrou
- Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece
| | - Chrysi Michailidou
- Department of Biopathology, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Charalampos Zarras
- Department of Biopathology, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Eleni Vagdatli
- Department of Biopathology, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Eleni Massa
- ICU, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Eleni Mouloudi
- ICU, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Athina Pyrpasopoulou
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Georgios Meletis
- Department of Microbiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
| | - Efthymia Protonotariou
- Department of Microbiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
| | - Lemonia Skoura
- Department of Microbiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
| | - Simeon Metallidis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636, Greece
| | - Theodoros Karampatakis
- Department of Microbiology, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | - Eleni Katsifa
- Department of Microbiology, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | - Anna Nikopoulou
- Infectious Disease Unit, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | - Alexandra Louka
- Department of Microbiology, Mamatsio General Hospital, Kozani 50100, Greece
| | - Artemisia Rizou
- Department of Microbiology, Mamatsio General Hospital, Kozani 50100, Greece
| | | | - Vassili Kouvelis
- Section of Genetics & Biotechnology, Department of Biology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772, Greece
| | - Andrew Borman
- Mycology Reference Laboratory, UK Health Security Agency, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Emmanuel Roilides
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Motamedi M, Amini A, Yazdanpanah S, Mahmoodi M, Khodadadi H, Zalpoor H. Evaluation of different DNA extraction methods based on steel-bullet beating for molecular diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Clin Lab Anal 2022; 36:e24657. [PMID: 35989493 PMCID: PMC9550968 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering increased trends toward molecular methods for detection/identification of fungi causing onychomycosis, the aim of this study is comparison three DNA extraction methods based on steel-bullet beating to extract DNA from nail. METHODS Ex -vivo onychomycosis model was developed using bovine hoof with Candida albicans and Aspergillus flavus. For two models, total DNA was extracted using the three different methods. In method 1, the extraction and purification were performed by steel-bullet beating and phenol chloroform protocol, respectively. In method 2, a freezing step were applied before beating. The purification step in method 3 was carried out using a commercial kit, although DNA extraction was done similarly to method 1 in that approach. To evaluate the efficacy of each method, the extracted genomic DNA was amplified with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions. Moreover, 50 nail samples were evaluated for onychomycosis using direct microscopy examination as well as PCR in order to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the optimal DNA extraction method. RESULTS Regarding the desirable quality of the extracted DNA, cost effectiveness, and simplicity, method 1 could be used to extract DNA effectively. Additionally, the obtained data showed that PCR had a higher detection rate of fungal agents in the nail samples than direct microscopic examination. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the mechanical disruption of the cell wall by steel-bullet beating is a useful and practical method to improve the quantity and quality of fungal DNA thorough the extraction process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Motamedi
- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical
- Science, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Abdulbaqi Amini
- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical
- Science, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Somayeh Yazdanpanah
- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical
- Science, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mozhgan Mahmoodi
- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical
- Science, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hossein Khodadadi
- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical
- Science, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Zalpoor
- Neuroscience Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Siences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dunbar J, Gallegos-Graves LV, Gans J, Morse SA, Pillai S, Anderson K, Hodge DR. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods to detect bacterial targets in aerosol samples. J Microbiol Methods 2018; 153:48-53. [PMID: 30201412 DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
DNA-based monitoring of pathogens in aerosol samples requires extraction methods that provide high recovery of DNA. To identify a suitable method, we evaluated six DNA extraction methods for recovery of target-specific DNA from samples with four bacterial agents at low abundance (<10,000 genome copies per detection assay). These methods differed in rigor of cell disruption, approach for DNA capture, and extent of DNA purification. The six methods varied 1000-fold in the recovery of DNA from spores or cells of surrogates of Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Francisella tularensis, each at about 105 CFU per sample. A custom method using paramagnetic Dynabeads for DNA capture greatly outperformed the other five methods. The cDynabead method provided about 80% recovery of target-specific DNA. The cDynabead method and a filtration method were further evaluated for DNA recovery from bacterial agents spiked on filters (c.a. 105 CFU of each agent per filter quadrant) that were subsequently used to collect background outdoor air particulates for 24-h. The filtration method generally failed to recover detectable quantities of target DNA from the spiked filters, suggesting at least a 100-fold loss of target DNA during extraction, whereas the custom cDynabead method consistently yielded DNA sufficient for target detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Dunbar
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
| | | | - Jason Gans
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States
| | | | - Segaran Pillai
- Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kevin Anderson
- Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, United States
| | - David R Hodge
- Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|