1
|
State-of-the-Art Dermatophyte Infections: Epidemiology Aspects, Pathophysiology, and Resistance Mechanisms. J Fungi (Basel) 2021; 7:jof7080629. [PMID: 34436168 PMCID: PMC8401872 DOI: 10.3390/jof7080629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The burden of fungal infections is not widely appreciated. Although these infections are responsible for over one million deaths annually, it is estimated that one billion people are affected by severe fungal diseases. Mycoses of nails and skin, primarily caused by fungi known as dermatophytes, are the most common fungal infections. Trichophyton rubrum appears to be the most common causative agent of dermatophytosis, followed by Trichophyton interdigitale. An estimated 25% of the world’s population suffers from dermatomycosis. Although these infections are not lethal, they compromise the quality of life of infected patients. The outcome of antidermatophytic treatments is impaired by various conditions, such as resistance and tolerance of certain dermatophyte strains. The adage “know your enemy” must be the focus of fungal research. There is an urgent need to increase awareness about the significance of these infections with precise epidemiological data and to improve knowledge regarding fungal biology and pathogenesis, with an emphasis on adaptive mechanisms to tackle adverse conditions from host counteractions. This review outlines the current knowledge about dermatophyte infections, with a focus on signaling pathways required for fungal infection establishment and a broad perspective on cellular and molecular factors involved in antifungal resistance and tolerance.
Collapse
|
2
|
Cellular and Molecular Response of Macrophages THP-1 during Co-Culture with Inactive Trichophyton rubrum Conidia. J Fungi (Basel) 2020; 6:jof6040363. [PMID: 33322794 PMCID: PMC7770574 DOI: 10.3390/jof6040363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Trichophyton rubrum is causing an increasing number of invasive infections, especially in immunocompromised and diabetic patients. The fungal invasive infectious process is complex and has not yet been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms during the interaction of macrophages and T. rubrum. For this purpose, we used a co-culture of previously germinated and heat-inactivated T. rubrum conidia placed in contact with human macrophages cell line THP-1 for 24 h. This interaction led to a higher level of release of interleukins IL-6, IL-2, nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB) and an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, demonstrating the cellular defense by macrophages against dead fungal elements. Cell viability assays showed that 70% of macrophages remained viable during co-culture. Human microRNA expression is involved in fungal infection and may modulate the immune response. Thus, the macrophage expression profile of microRNAs during co-culture revealed the modulation of 83 microRNAs, with repression of 33 microRNAs and induction of 50 microRNAs. These data were analyzed using bioinformatics analysis programs and the modulation of the expression of some microRNAs was validated by qRT-PCR. In silico analysis showed that the target genes of these microRNAs are related to the inflammatory response, oxidative stress, apoptosis, drug resistance, and cell proliferation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Petrucelli MF, de Abreu MH, Cantelli BAM, Segura GG, Nishimura FG, Bitencourt TA, Marins M, Fachin AL. Epidemiology and Diagnostic Perspectives of Dermatophytoses. J Fungi (Basel) 2020; 6:E310. [PMID: 33238603 PMCID: PMC7712040 DOI: 10.3390/jof6040310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Dermatophytoses affect about 25% of the world population, and the filamentous fungus Trichophyton rubrum is the main causative agent of this group of diseases. Dermatomycoses are caused by pathogenic fungi that generally trigger superficial infections and that feed on keratinized substrates such as skin, hair, and nails. However, there are an increasing number of reports describing dermatophytes that invade deep layers such as the dermis and hypodermis and that can cause deep infections in diabetic and immunocompromised patients, as well as in individuals with immunodeficiency. Despite the high incidence and importance of dermatophytes in clinical mycology, the diagnosis of this type of infection is not always accurate. The conventional methods most commonly used for mycological diagnosis are based on the identification of microbiological and biochemical features. However, in view of the limitations of these conventional methods, molecular diagnostic techniques are increasingly being used because of their higher sensitivity, specificity and rapidity and have become more accessible. The most widely used molecular techniques are conventional PCR, quantitative PCR, multiplex PCR, nested, PCR, PCR-RFLP, and PCR-ELISA. Another promising technique for the identification of microorganisms is the analysis of protein profiles by MALDI-TOF MS. Molecular techniques are promising but it is necessary to improve the quality and availability of the information in genomic and proteomic databases in order to streamline the use of bioinformatics in the identification of dermatophytes of clinical interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monise Fazolin Petrucelli
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Mariana Heinzen de Abreu
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Bruna Aline Michelotto Cantelli
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Gabriela Gonzalez Segura
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Felipe Garcia Nishimura
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Tamires Aparecida Bitencourt
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto SP 14049-900, Brazil
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto SP 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Mozart Marins
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Ana Lúcia Fachin
- Biotechnology Unit, Unaerp, Av. Costábile Romano, 2201, Ribeirão Preto SP 14096-900, Brazil; (M.F.P.); (M.H.d.A.); (B.A.M.C.); (G.G.S.); (F.G.N.); (T.A.B.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|