B-cell activating factor, a predictor of antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplantation recipients

Non-invasive molecular biomarkers for monitoring solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive overview

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention for individuals with end-stage organ failure. Despite the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy, the risk of graft rejection persists in all viable transplants between individuals. The risk of rejection may vary depending on the degree of compatibility between the donor and recipient for both human leucocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA gene-encoded products. Monitoring the status of the allograft is a critical aspect of post-transplant management, with invasive biopsies being the standard of care for detecting rejection. Non-invasive biomarkers are increasingly being recognized as valuable tools for aiding in the detection of graft rejection, monitoring graft status and evaluating the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we focus on the importance of molecular biomarkers in solid organ transplantation and their potential role in clinical practice. Conventional molecular biomarkers used in transplantation include HLA typing, detection of anti-HLA antibodies, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genotypes, and anti-MHC class 1-related chain A antibodies, which are important for assessing the compatibility of the donor and recipient. Emerging molecular biomarkers include the detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA, microRNAs (regulation of gene expression), exosomes (small vesicles secreted by cells), and kidney solid organ response test, in the recipient's blood for early signs of rejection. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of these molecular biomarkers and their potential role in improving transplant outcomes.

Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.

RESULTS

Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.

Monitoring of Soluble Forms of BAFF System (BAFF, APRIL, sR-BAFF, sTACI and sBCMA) in Kidney Transplantation

BAFF system plays an essential role in B cells homeostasis and tolerance, although it has widely not been tested in transplantation with doubtful results. The main purpose was to study the BAFF soluble forms and their correlation with acute rejection (AR) and donor-specific antibodies production. Serum levels of BAFF, APRIL, and soluble forms of their receptors were analyzed in renal recipients with and without acute rejection (AR/NAR) appearance. All molecules were evaluated at pre- and post-transplantation. sTACI showed a significant correlation with BAFF and sR-BAFF levels, and sBCMA also showed a positive correlation with sAPRIL levels. A significant increase in sAPRIL levels in patients suffering AR was also found, and ROC curves analysis showed an AUC = 0.724, a concentration of 6.05 ng/ml (sensitivity: 66.7%; specificity: 73.3%), the best cutoff point for predicting AR. In the post-transplant dynamics of sAPRIL levels in the longitudinal cohort, we observed a significant decrease at 3 and 6 month post-transplantation compared to pretransplantation status. We also observed that recipients with high pre-transplant levels of sAPRIL generated antibodies earlier than those with lower sAPRIL levels, although their long-term post-transplantation was not different. Our results show that elevated serum levels of APRIL may be helpful as a biomarker for the diagnosis of AR, although the longitudinal study shows that it is not helpful as a prognostic biomarker.

Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis of Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Renal Transplantation

Renal transplantation is currently the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR) remains a serious obstacle for the long-term survival of patients with renal transplantation and a problem to be solved. At present, the role and mechanism underlying immune factors such as T- and B- cell subsets in cABMR after renal transplantation remain unclear. In this study, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) from cABMR and control subjects was performed to define the transcriptomic landscape at single-cell resolution. A comprehensive scRNA-seq analysis was performed. The results indicated that most cell types in the cABMR patients exhibited an intense interferon response and release of proinflammatory cytokines. In addition, we found that the expression of MT-ND6, CXCL8, NFKBIA, NFKBIZ, and other genes were up-regulated in T- and B-cells and these genes were associated with pro-inflammatory response and immune regulation. Western blot and qRT-PCR experiments also confirmed the up-regulated expression of these genes in cABMR. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses indicated that the overexpressed genes in T- and B-cells were mainly enriched in inflammatory pathways, including the TNF, IL-17, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Additionally, MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways were also involved in the occurrence and development of cABMR. This is consistent with the experimental results of Western blot. Trajectory analysis assembled the T-cell subsets into three differentiation paths with distinctive phenotypic and functional prog rams. CD8 effector T cells and γδ T cells showed three different differentiation trajectories, while CD8_MAI T cells and naive T cells primarily had two differentiation trajectories. Cell-cell interaction analysis revealed strong T/B cells and neutrophils activation in cABMR. Thus, the study offers new insight into pathogenesis and may have implications for the identification of novel therapeutic targets for cABMR.

Graft rejection markers in children undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant for bone marrow failure

CXCL9, BAFF, and sC5b-9 are potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for graft rejection after transplant.

Fever monitoring is a widely available and informative predictor of graft rejection after transplant.

Graft rejection (GR) is a poorly understood complication of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). GR risk factors are well published, but there are no reliable biomarkers or therapies known. Fever is the most common symptom of GR, but no study has evaluated fever kinetics as a diagnostic marker of GR. The objectives of this study were to identify mechanisms, biomarkers, and potential therapies for GR after HCT. Chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), B-cell activating factor (BAFF), and complement markers (sC5b-9, C3a, and C5a) were measured in 7 patients with GR and compared with 15 HCT controls. All patients had a diagnosis of aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, or genetically undefined chromosomal fragility syndrome. All patients with GR were febrile during GR; therefore, control patients who underwent HCT were matched for diagnosis and early fevers after HCT. Patients withh GR had significantly higher CXCL9, BAFF, and sC5b-9 at the time of fever and GR compared with control patients who underwent HCT at the time of fever. The maximum fever was significantly higher and occurred significantly later in the transplant course in patients with GR compared with febrile HCT controls. These data support the use of CXCL9, BAFF, sC5b-9, and fever kinetics as GR markers. Two patients with GR underwent a second HCT that was complicated by high fevers. Both patients received interferon and complement blockers during their second HCT, and both preserved their graft. These laboratory and clinical findings support larger studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon, complement, and BAFF inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of GR after HCT.

Personalized Medicine for Kidney Transplantation: Association of Graft Survival and Acute Transplant Rejection with Genetic Variation in B Cell Activating Factor System Signaling

Kidney transplantation (KT) clinical outcomes are highly variable across patients and would benefit from predictive biomarkers to achieve personalized/precision medicine. The B cell activating factor (BAFF) system signaling plays an essential role in B lymphocytes' homeostasis, and is implicated in activation and survival of B lymphocytes. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in BAFF system genes are therefore strong candidates to identify the genetic mechanisms underpinning variable clinical outcomes in KT. We report here new findings on BAFF system genetic polymorphisms in KT patients in relation to two key phenotypes of clinical interest: graft survival and acute rejection (AR). A total of 168 KT patients, of which 29 suffered AR, participated in this study. The BAFF system polymorphisms in five genes TNFSF13B, TNFSF13, TNFRSF13C, TNFRSF13B, and TNFRSF17 were characterized using TaqMan SNP genotyping. Patients with KT who had an AA genotype in polymorphism rs3803800 of the TNFSF13 gene had a higher risk of suffering AR (p = 0.046; odds ratios = 3.38, 95% CI: 1.02-11.2). Moreover, patients with AA genotype (rs3803800) in the TNFSF13 gene had a significantly lower AR-free time than the GG/GA genotypes (69.2% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.037). Of importance, bioinformatics analysis showed that the polymorphism rs3803800 could alter splicing regulation and affect the proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) expression levels. The analysis of graft survival did not show a significant association with the polymorphisms analyzed in this study. In conclusion, the rs3803800 genetic polymorphism from this study of BAFF system genes appears to display importance in AR-free time for KT patients, and thus, warrants further research in independent populations as a putative predictive biomarker of AR. These findings also inform future personalized/precision medicine efforts and functional genomic studies in KT patients.

Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient

Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.

B-cell activating factor BAFF as a novel alert marker for the immunological risk stratification after kidney transplantation

The B cell activating factor BAFF has gained importance in the context of kidney transplantation due to its role in B cell survival. Studies have shown that BAFF correlates with an increased incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies. In this study, we analyzed a defined cohort of kidney transplant recipients who were treated with standardized immunosuppressive regimens according to their immunological risk profile. The aim was to add BAFF as an awareness marker in the course after transplantation to consider patient’s individual immunological risk profile. Included patients were transplanted between 2016 and 2018. Baseline data, graft function, the occurrence of rejection episodes, signs of microvascular infiltration, and DSA kinetics were recorded over 3 years. BAFF levels were determined 14 d, 3 and 12 months post transplantation. Although no difference in graft function could be observed, medium-risk patients showed a clear dynamic in their BAFF levels with low levels shortly after transplantation and an increase in values of 123% over the course of 1 year. Patients with high BAFF values were more susceptible to rejection, especially antibody-mediated rejection and displayed intensified microvascular inflammation; the combination of high BAFF + DSA puts patients at risk. The changing BAFF kinetics of the medium risk group as well as the increased occurrence of rejections at high BAFF values enables BAFF to be seen as an awareness factor. To compensate the changing immunological risk, a switch from a weaker induction therapy to an intensified maintenance therapy is required.

Innate-like self-reactive B cells infiltrate human renal allografts during transplant rejection

Intrarenal B cells in human renal allografts indicate transplant recipients with a poor prognosis, but how these cells contribute to rejection is unclear. Here we show using single-cell RNA sequencing that intrarenal class-switched B cells have an innate cell transcriptional state resembling mouse peritoneal B1 or B-innate (Bin) cells. Antibodies generated by Bin cells do not bind donor-specific antigens nor are they enriched for reactivity to ubiquitously expressed self-antigens. Rather, Bin cells frequently express antibodies reactive with either renal-specific or inflammation-associated antigens. Furthermore, local antigens can drive Bin cell proliferation and differentiation into plasma cells expressing self-reactive antibodies. These data show a mechanism of human inflammation in which a breach in organ-restricted tolerance by infiltrating innate-like B cells drives local tissue destruction.

Intrarenal B cells are indicative of poor prognosis in human renal allografts. Here the authors use single cell RNA sequencing to examine how intrarenal B cells contribute to renal rejection and find a population of innate B cells reactive to renal-specific or inflammation-associated antigens.

Approaches for Controlling Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection Through Targeting B Cells

Both acute and chronic antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR), which are directly mediated by B cells, remain difficult to treat. Long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) in bone marrow (BM) play a crucial role in the production of the antibodies that induce AMR. However, LLPCs survive through a T cell-independent mechanism and resist conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Desensitization therapy is therefore performed, although it is accompanied by severe side effects and the pathological condition may be at an irreversible stage when these antibodies, which induce AMR development, are detected in the serum. In other words, AMR control requires the development of a diagnostic method that predicts its onset before LLPC differentiation and enables therapeutic intervention and the establishment of humoral immune monitoring methods providing more detailed information, including individual differences in the susceptibility to immunosuppressive agents and the pathological conditions. In this study, we reviewed recent studies related to the direct or indirect involvement of immunocompetent cells in the differentiation of naïve-B cells into LLPCs, the limitations of conventional methods, and the possible development of novel control methods in the context of AMR. This information will significantly contribute to the development of clinical applications for AMR and improve the prognosis of patients who undergo organ transplantation.

Investigating the Role of BAFF and Its Receptors in Renal Transplant Recipients with Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Background

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease (ESRD), but graft rejection is still a big obstacle that occurs in spite of immunosuppressive therapy. B cells are considered as the major reason for renal graft rejection because of antibody production. Due to their roles in B cell function, we intended to evaluate the B cell activating factor (BAFF) and its receptors including BAFF receptor (BAFF-R), B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), and transmembrane activator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) in renal transplant patients.

Method

The study included 40 kidney allograft patients with cAMR, 40 stable kidney allograft patients, and 8 healthy volunteers with normal kidney function. The percentage and absolute number of CD19⁺ B cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, the serum level of BAFF was analyzed by ELISA, and mRNA expressions of BAFF and BAFF receptors (BAFF-R, BCMA, and TACI) were measured using quantitative real-time PCR.

Results

The percentage and the absolute number of B cells decreased significantly in stable and cAMR patients compared to healthy individuals. The serum level and gene expression of BAFF, as well as the mRNA level of BCMA, were increased significantly in both cAMR and stable patients compared to healthy volunteers. There was an overexpression of TACI mRNA in cAMR patients compared to stable patients.

Conclusions

Both soluble protein and mRNA transcript of BAFF increased in transplant recipients. However, BAFF neither at the serum level nor at the mRNA transcript level cannot be a good biomarker for the prediction of cAMR. In addition, expression of TACI, compared to other receptors of BAFF, confers a potential to be used in distinguishing cAMR and stable kidney transplant patients.

Recent Advances on Biomarkers of Early and Late Kidney Graft Dysfunction

New biomarkers of early and late graft dysfunction are needed in renal transplant to improve management of complications and prolong graft survival. A wide range of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, measured in different biological fluids (serum, plasma, urine) and in renal tissues, have been proposed for post-transplant delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). This review investigates old and new potential biomarkers for each of these clinical domains, seeking to underline their limits and strengths. OMICs technology has allowed identifying many candidate biomarkers, providing diagnostic and prognostic information at very early stages of pathological processes, such as AR. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are further promising tools. Although most of these biomarkers still need to be validated in multiple independent cohorts and standardized, they are paving the way for substantial advances, such as the possibility of accurately predicting risk of DGF before graft is implanted, of making a “molecular” diagnosis of subclinical rejection even before histological lesions develop, or of dissecting etiology of CAD. Identification of “immunoquiescent” or even tolerant patients to guide minimization of immunosuppressive therapy is another area of active research. The parallel progress in imaging techniques, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence (AI) is helping to fully exploit the wealth of information provided by biomarkers, leading to improved disease nosology of old entities such as transplant glomerulopathy. Prospective studies are needed to assess whether introduction of these new sets of biomarkers into clinical practice could actually reduce the need for renal biopsy, integrate traditional tools, and ultimately improve graft survival compared to current management.

B cell modulation strategies in the improvement of transplantation outcomes

Successful transplantation outcome is the final goal in most end stage and nonfunctional organs; however, despite using different therapeutic strategies, antibody-mediated rejection is still a big obstacle. B cells have a key role in transplant rejection by several functions, such as antibody production, antigen presenting, contribution in T cell activation, forming the germinal center, and tertiary lymphoid organs. Therefore, B cells modulation seems to be very crucial in transplant outcome. A double-edged sword function is considered for B cells during transplantation; On the one hand, antibody production against the transplanted organ induces antibody-mediated rejection. On the other hand, IL10 production by regulatory B (Breg) cells induces graft tolerance. Nowadays, several monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are available for B cell modulation that are routinely used in transplant recipients, among which rituximab (anti-CD20 mAb) act in eliminating B cells. However, there are some other monoclonal antibodies, such as epratuzumab and Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO), which exert anti-CD22 activity, resulting in disruption of B cell functions and induction of tolerance in autoimmune disease or B cell malignancies; that notwithstanding, these mAbs have not yet been tried in transplantation. In this review, we focus on different methods for modulating the activity of B cells as well as induction of Breg cells, aiming to prevent the allograft rejection.

High Pretransplant BAFF Levels and B-cell Subset Polarized towards a Memory Phenotype as Predictive Biomarkers for Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is one of the leading causes of graft loss in kidney transplantation and B cells play an important role in the development of it. A B-cell activating factor (BAFF) is a cytokine involved in B cell ontogeny. Here, we analyzed whether B cell maturation and the effect of B cell soluble factors, such as BAFF could be involved in AbMR. Serum BAFF levels and B and T cell subpopulations were analyzed 109 kidney transplant patients before transplantation and at 6 and 12 months after kidney transplantation. Pretransplant serum BAFF levels as well as memory B cell subpopulations were significantly higher in those patients who suffered clinical AbMR during the first 12 months after kidney transplantation. Similar results were observed in the prospective analysis of patients with subclinical antibody-mediated rejection detected in the surveillance biopsy performed at 12 months after kidney transplantation. A multivariate analysis confirmed the independent role of BAFF in the development of AbMR, irrespective of other classical variables. Pretransplant serum BAFF levels could be an important non-invasive biomarker for the prediction of the development of AbMR and posttransplant increased serum BAFF levels contribute to AbMR.

Biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of the literature on the use of new biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The kidney allograft biopsy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection. However, the kidney biopsy is invasive and could be indeterminate. A significant progress has been made in discovery of new biomarkers of rejection, and some of them have been introduced recently for potential use in clinical practice including measurement of serum donor-derived cell free DNA, allo-specific CD154 + T-cytotoxic memory cells, and gene-expression 'signatures'. The literature supports that these biomarkers provide fair and reliable diagnostic accuracy and may be helpful in clinical decision-making when the kidney biopsy is contraindicated or is inconclusive.

SUMMARY

The new biomarkers provide a promising approach to detect acute rejections in a noninvasive way.

The role of soluble B cell-activating factor in further stratifying the risk of antibody-mediated rejection post-renal transplant: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of serum soluble B cell-activating factor (sBAFF) for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which remains controversial.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and three Chinese databases. Studies of any relevant design were included. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019109198).

RESULTS

Nine observational studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 1302 cases (median NOS quality score = 8, range 6-8). The incidence of ABMR was significantly higher in the high sBAFF group than in the low sBAFF level group (Risk ratio [RR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.52-2.74], I² = 26%, P < 0.01, N = 1014). The subgroup analysis showed that regardless of pre-transplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) status, the high sBAFF level group still had a significantly higher incidence of ABMR. sBAFF was not associated with the risk of TCMR. The sBAFF level was significantly higher in the anti-HLA-antibody (+) group than in anti-HLA-antibody (-) patients before or after kidney transplantation (Standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.43 [0.29-0.56], P < 0.01, I² = 34%, N = 1001).

CONCLUSION

sBAFF is a promising biomarker to further stratify the risk of ABMR post-renal transplant.

B-Cell Activating Factor Predicts Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study

B cell activating factor (BAFF) belonging to TNF family is a cytokine that enhances B-cell proliferation and differentiation. Recently, It has been suggested that BAFF might be a potential therapeutic target for treating autoimmune disease. However, the relationship between BAFF and allograft rejection is controversial, and the clinical significance of BAFF in predicting allograft rejection need to be further explored. We conducted 6-month follow-up study to confirm the hypothesis that BAFF might be a risk factor for predicting acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. At the end of the study, a total of 155 kidney transplant recipients were recruited from October 2015 to October 2017, and classified into acute rejection group (n = 34) and stable renal function group (n = 121) according to their clinical course. We demonstrate that the serum BAFF levels when acute rejection occurred was significantly higher than that in the stable renal function group (2426.19 ± 892.19 vs. 988.17 ± 485.63 pg/mL, P < 0.05). BAFF expression was significantly enhanced in the membrane and cytoplasm of renal tubule epithelial cells in the transplant kidney tissue with acute rejection, and a positive correlation between BAFF and C4d expression was also observed (r = 0.880, P = 0.001). ROC analyses highlight the superiority of serum BAFF level before transplant over those on other post-transplant days in prediction of acute rejection episodes. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC (area under curve) were 83.3, 89.5, and 0.886%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that recipients with higher pretransplant BAFF levels had higher acute rejection incidence (P = 0.003). In conclusion, we have identified that BAFF levels are associated with the acute rejection and could be a promising biomarker to predict kidney transplant rejection risks.

B Cell Activating Factor, Renal Allograft Antibody-Mediated Rejection, and Long-Term Outcome

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of renal allograft lacks typical phenotypes and clinical manifestations, always resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. It has been considered to be an elemental factor influencing the improvement of the long-term outcome of renal allograft. The B cell activating factor (BAFF) signal plays a fundamental function in the process of antibody-mediated immune response. Data from recipients and the nonhuman primate ABMR model suggest that the BAFF signal participates in the ABMR of renal allograft, while there are objections. The challenges in the diagnosis of ABMR, different study population, and details of research may explain the discrepancy. Large quantities of dynamic, credible data of BAFF ligands and their association with renal allograft pathological characteristics would constitute a direct proof of the role of BAFF in the progression of renal allograft ABMR.

B Cell Activating Factor (BAFF) in Long-term Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Not a Prognostic Marker for Allograft Dysfunction or Survival

OBJECTIVE

B cell activating factor (BAFF) has been shown to play a role in B cell survival, maturation, and activation, and has been linked with renal transplant outcome. BAFF signaling has been associated with plasmablast survival, anti-HLA immunization, and loss of graft function. We aimed to analyze the interplay between BAFF, memory B cells, and plasmablasts in relation to allograft function in long-term kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and their anti-HLA sensitization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 70 long-term KTx recipients on standard immunosuppression 15 ± 6 years post transplantation (44 stable, 26 chronic allograft dysfunction, CAD) and 25 healthy volunteers. CD19+ B cells, memory B cells (CD19+CD27+), and plasmablasts (CD19+CD24-CD27++CD38++) were enumerated with flow cytometry. BAFF serum level and anti-HLA antibodies were assessed by Luminex bead arrays.

RESULTS

We found no difference in BAFF levels between KTx recipients and controls (median, interquartile range: 1.67, 1.40-1.97 vs 1.78, 1.63-1.93 ng/mL, P = .478) and no correlation between BAFF level and cell counts. Recipients presented lower plasmablast count than controls (22.5, 8-57 vs 79, 48-166 cells/mL, P < .001). There was a positive correlation between estimated glomerular filtration rate and plasmablasts (r_s = 0.30, P = .013) in recipients. Cell populations and BAFF were not related to the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. None of the parameters investigated was related to deterioration of allograft function during the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

BAFF serum level is not related to anti-HLA sensitization, circulating memory B cells, plasmablast count, or allograft function. Circulating plasmablasts are associated with current allograft function but are not prognostic for future course.

Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Glomerular Diseases: Translational Perspectives

The unique contributions of memory B cells and plasma cells in kidney diseases remain unclear. In this review, we evaluate the clinical experience with treatments directed at B cells, such as rituximab, and at plasma cells, such as proteasome inhibition, to shed light on the role of these two B lineage compartments in glomerular diseases. Specifically, analysis of these targeted interventions in diseases such as ANCA-associated vasculitis, SLE, and antibody-mediated transplant rejection permits insight into the pathogenetic effect of these cells. Notwithstanding the limitations of preclinical models and clinical studies (heterogeneous populations, among others), the data suggest that memory B and plasma cells represent two engines of autoimmunity, with variable involvement in these diseases. Whereas memory B cells and plasma cells appear to be key in ANCA-associated vasculitis and antibody-mediated transplant rejection, respectively, SLE seems likely to be driven by both autoimmune compartments. These conclusions have implications for the future development of targeted therapeutics in immune-mediated renal disease.

B-cell activating factor BAFF reflects patients' immunological risk profile after kidney transplantation

The B-cell activating factor BAFF plays an important role in the development and maturation of B-lymphocytes, which can contribute to the generation of donor-specific antibodies and thus may influence graft function and graft survival. Inconsistent data on the role of BAFF levels after renal transplantation for the formation of donor-specific antibodies and the contribution for allograft rejection exist. The aim of the current study was to determine to what extent the degree of pre-immunization is reflected by each patient's BAFF levels before transplantation and in the follow-up. Furthermore, the impact of BAFF on allograft rejection frequency as well as severity and resulting allograft function over time was analyzed. Additionally, the impact of viral infections on BAFF levels after transplantation - as a potential confounder - was examined. For this purpose, a group of pre-sensitized patients (PRA>0%, (52±24% on average), n=40) was compared with non-sensitized patients (PRA=0%, n=62) and in a subsequent analysis stratification in accordance to the detected BAFF level was performed. Pre-sensitized patients had significantly higher BAFF levels before transplantation and suffered significantly more often from early steroid-resistant, mainly antibody-mediated rejections. A result which was confirmed also in highly sensitized patients with PRA levels >50%. Additionally, in the follow-up patients with either rising BAFF levels over time or BAFF levels above the median also had significantly more often antibody mediated rejections. Additionally, patients with BAFF levels above detected median even displayed impaired creatinine values as well as an induced eGFR slope up to month 48 after transplantation. The occurrence of viral infections (CMV, BKV) was only an additional influencing factor in the absence of concomitant allograft rejections. Therefore, the B-cell proliferation factor BAFF appears not only to reflect the immunological risk profile of patients in the context of kidney transplantation, it may possibly be further developed as a predictor of patients with an increased risk profile for subsequent allograft rejection and impaired allograft function.