The importance of residual kidney function in haemodialysis patients

Once-per-week haemodialysis in a financial crisis: Predictors of interdialytic weight gain

BACKGROUND

Several countries are experiencing challenges in maintaining standard haemodialysis services for people with kidney failure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the health profile of people receiving haemodialysis and to identify factors associated with interdialytic weight gain.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 166 adults with kidney failure and receiving haemodialysis for at least 3 months were included.

MEASUREMENTS

A structured chart audit form collected, demographic and haemodialysis treatment characteristics, recent biochemical and haematological results, and prescribed treatment regimens from clinical records. Data were analysed descriptively. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to identify independent risk factors for interdialytic weight gain.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52 years (SD = 12.5), over half were male (60.2%, n = 100), and most were receiving 4 h of haemodialysis once per week (87.3%, n = 145). Approximately half (51.8%, n = 86) had an interdialytic weight gain >2%. Being female (OR = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.51-7.61), increased comorbidities (OR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22-1.84) and having BMI outside of the normal range (overweight/obese [OR = 8.49; 95% CI, 3.58-20.13] or underweight [OR = 4.61; 95% CI, 1.39-15.31]) were independent risk factors for increased interdialytic weight gain.

CONCLUSION

Most patients were receiving 4 h of haemodialysis once per week although only modest alterations in potassium, phosphate, and fluid status were observed. Understanding the patient profile and predictors of interdialytic weight gain will inform the development of self-management interventions to optimise clinician support.

Rate and reasons for peritoneal dialysis dropout following haemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis switch: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patient experiences and survival outcomes can be influenced by the circumstances related to dialysis initiation and subsequent modality choices. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the rate and reasons for peritoneal dialysis (PD) dropout following haemodialysis (HD) to PD switch.

METHOD

This systematic review conducted searches in four databases, including Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (study ID: CRD42023405718). Outcomes included factors leading to the switch from HD to PD, the rate and reasons for PD dropout and mortality difference in two groups (PD first group versus HD to PD group). The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and the GRADE tool were used to assess quality.

RESULTS

4971 papers were detected, and 13 studies were included. On meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in PD dropout in the PD first group (OR: 0.81; 95%CI: 0.61, 1.09; I2 = 83%; P = 0.16), however, there was a statistically significant reduction in the rate of mortality (OR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.25, 0.92; I2 = 73%; P = 0.03) compared to the HD to PD group. The primary reasons for HD to PD switch, included vascular access failure, patient preference, social issues, and cardiovascular disease. Causes for PD dropout differed between the two groups, but inadequate dialysis and peritonitis were the main reasons for PD dropout in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the PD first group, a previous HD history may not impact PD dropout rates for patients, but it could impact mortality in the HD to PD group. The reasons for PD dropout differed between the two groups, with no statistical differences. Psychosocial reasons for PD dropout are valuable to further research. Additionally, establishing a consensus on the definition of PD dropout is crucial for future studies.

Time-Varying Determinants of Graft Failure in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in Europe

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the time-varying determinants of kidney graft failure in children.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of primary pediatric kidney transplant recipients (younger than 18 years) from the Eurotransplant registry (1990-2020). Piece-wise exponential additive mixed models were applied to analyze time-varying recipient, donor, and transplant risk factors. Primary outcome was death-censored graft failure.

RESULTS

We report on 4528 kidney transplantations, of which 68% with deceased and 32% with living donor. One thousand six hundred and thirty-eight recipients experienced graft failure, and 168 died with a functioning graft. Between 2011 and 2020, the 5-year graft failure risk was 10% for deceased donor and 4% for living donor kidney transplant recipients. Risk of graft failure decreased five-fold from 1990 to 2020. The association between living donor transplantation and the lower risk of graft failure was strongest in the first month post-transplant (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.73) and remained statistically significant until 12 years post-transplant. Risk factors for graft failure in the first 2 years were deceased donor younger than 12 years or older than 46 years, potentially recurrent kidney disease, and panel-reactive antibody >0%. Other determinants of graft failure included dialysis before transplantation (until 5 years post-transplant), human leukocyte antigen mismatch 2-4 (0-15 years post-transplant), human leukocyte antigen mismatch 5-6 (2-12 years post-transplant), and hemodialysis (8-14 years post-transplant). Recipients older than 11 years at transplantation had a higher risk of graft failure 1-8 years post-transplant compared with other age groups, whereas young recipients had a lower risk throughout follow-up. Analysis of the combined effect of post-transplant time and recipient age showed a higher rate of graft failure during the first 5 years post-transplant in adolescents compared with young transplant recipients. In contrast to deceased donor younger than 12 years, deceased donor older than 46 years was consistently associated with a higher graft failure risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a long-term inverse association between living donor kidney transplantation and the risk of graft failure. The determinants of graft failure varied with time. There was a significant cumulative effect of adolescence and time post-transplant. The ideal donor age window was dependent on time post-transplant.

Incremental versus conventional haemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality.

Results

A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups.

Conclusions

Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.

Unveiling the Clinical Benefits of High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: Optimizing the Removal of Medium-Weight Uremic Toxins and Beyond

Dialysis treatment has improved the survival of patients with kidney failure. However, the hospitalization and mortality rates remain alarmingly high, primarily due to incomplete uremic toxin elimination. High-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) has emerged as a promising approach that significantly improves patient outcomes by effectively eliminating medium and large uremic toxins, which explains its increasing adoption, particularly in Europe and Japan. Interest in this therapy has grown following the findings of the recently published CONVINCE study, as well as the need to understand the mechanisms behind the benefits. This comprehensive review aims to enhance the scientific understanding by explaining the underlying physiological mechanisms that contribute to the positive effects of HDF in terms of short-term benefits, like hemodynamic tolerance and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, it explores the rationale behind the medium-term clinical benefits, including phosphorus removal, the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, anemia management, immune response modulation, nutritional effects, the mitigation of bone disorders, neuropathy relief, and amyloidosis reduction. This review also analyzes the impact of HDF on patient-reported outcomes and mortality. Considering the importance of applying personalized uremic toxin removal strategies tailored to the unique needs of each patient, high-volume HDF appears to be the most effective treatment to date for patients with renal failure. This justifies the need to prioritize its application in clinical practice, initially focusing on the groups with the greatest potential benefits and subsequently extending its use to a larger number of patients.

Comparison of Residual Kidney Function Assessment Between the Hemodialysis 2-Day and 3-Day Interdialytic Interval

Key Points

There was no detected difference in measured residual kidney function between the short and long interdialytic intervals. Sample collection for assessment of residual kidney function can occur at either interdialytic interval without concerns surrounding comparability of results.

Background

Residual kidney function (RKF) is a dynamic marker having been shown to demonstrate fluctuations over successive days of the interdialytic interval. This study compares measured RKF between the long interdialytic interval (LIDP) and short interdialytic interval (SIDP).

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. Thirty-four clinically stable, ambulatory facility hemodialysis patients were recruited. Urine samples collected in the last 12 hours of each interdialytic interval were paired with a blood test at the conclusion of each 12-hour interval to evaluate measured RKF through a mean of urinary urea and creatinine clearances. The paired Student t test and the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks were used, respectively, to compare differences in assessed mean and median RKF.

Results

Although average serum creatinine (607±219 µ mol/L versus 547±192 µ mol/L, P = <0.01) and serum urea concentrations (25±15 mmol/L versus 19±5 mmol/L, P = 0.01) were higher in the LIDP compared with SIDP, there was no statistically significant difference in urine volume (630±460 ml versus 520±470 ml, P = 0.06), urine urea (116±49 mmol/L versus 118±90 mmol/L, P = 0.87), or urine creatinine (7816±3943 µ mol/L versus 8926±5752 µ mol/L, P = 0.06) concentrations. On the whole, there was no significant difference in assessed RKF between the LIDP and SIDP (mean 8±6 ml/min versus 6±4 ml/min, P = 0.24; median 6.3 [3.2–10.4] versus 5.8 [3.8–8.9], P = 0.13).

Conclusions

There was no statistically significant difference observed in assessed RKF between the LIDP and SIDP. Measured RKF through samples collected from the LIDP and SIDP is comparable.

The ABCs of personalized incremental dialysis start, Le Mans style

Thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD) is considered the standard of care for patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) on extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. However, recent evidence has shown that up to one third of patients start dialysis with a residual kidney function that could allow a reduced frequency/dialysis dose. Interest towards HD schedules other than thrice weekly and the lessons learned from peritoneal dialysis, in addition to growing attention to patients' quality of life, have promoted renewed attention towards incremental HD (iHD). iHD comprises once and twice weekly schedules, makes it possible to soften the "dialysis shock" at the inception of therapy and is patient-friendly. Moreover, it might contribute to preserving residual kidney function longer. Nevertheless, iHD is performed differently in different settings and no guidelines exist on this subject. Taking advantage of the experience accrued with regard to the treatment of advanced CKD both in the outpatient clinic and in the dialysis unit in Le Mans, where two thirds of incident HD patients start in an incremental way, we aimed to present the practical aspects of iHD and discuss its advantages and drawbacks.

On the importance of the interplay of residual renal function with clinical outcomes in end-stage kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most important public health concerns of the century, and is associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality and social costs. CKD evolving towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is on the rise resulting in a greater number of patients requiring peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). The aim of this manuscript is to review the current literature on the interplay of residual renal function (RRF) with clinical outcomes in ESKD. The persistence of RRF is one of the most important predictors of decreased morbidity, mortality, and better quality of life in both PD and HD patients. RRF contributes to the well-being of ESKD patients through various mechanisms including higher clearance of solutes, maintenance of fluid balance, removal of uremic toxins and control of electrolytes. Furthermore, RRF has beneficial effects on inflammation, anemia, malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, obesity, changes in the microbiota, and cardiac diseases. Several strategies have been proposed to preserve RRF, such as blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, better blood pressure control, incremental PD and HD. Several clinical trials investigating the issue of preservation of RRF are ongoing. They are needed to broaden our understanding of the interplay of RRF with clinical outcomes in ESKD.

Incremental and Personalized Hemodialysis Start: A New Standard of Care

Introduction

Incremental hemodialysis (iHD) may attenuate “dialysis shock” and reduce costs, preserving quality of life. It is considered difficult to reconcile with HD wards’ routine; fear of underdialysis and increasing mortality are additional concerns. The aim of this study was to evaluate mortality, morbidity, and costs in a large HD ward where iHD is the standard of HD start.

Methods

This observational study included all incident HD patients in 2017 to 2021, stratified according to HD start: iHD (1–2 sessions/wk), decremental HD (dHD, 3 sessions/wk at start, later reduced), or standard (3 sessions/wk). Results were compared with data recorded in the same unit before the incremental program (2015–2017) and with a propensity score-matched cohort from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry.

Results

A total of 158 patients started HD in 2017 to 2021, 57.6% on iHD, 8.9% dHD, and 33.5% standard HD schedule. Patients on the standard schedule had lower initial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (5 vs. 7 ml/min per 1.72 m², P = 0.003). We found no survival differences according to period of start (same center) and propensity score matching (REIN). Patients intensively followed in the pre-HD period were more likely to start on iHD-dHD. Persistence on iHD-dHD was about 50% at 1 year and 35% at 2 years. Hospitalization rates and time to first hospitalization or death did not differ between the schedules. The iHD-dHD policy allowed a 16% cost saving, even accounting for supplemental biochemical tests.

Conclusion

Our study reveals that iHD can be a new standard of care, as it is safe and feasible in up to two-thirds of patients on incident HD.

Peritoneal Dialysis for Potential Kidney Transplant Recipients: Pride or Prejudice?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is recognized as the gold-standard of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that receiving a pre-emptive KT ensures the best recipient and graft survivals. However, due to an overwhelming discrepancy between the organs available and the patients on the transplant waiting list, the vast majority of transplant candidates require prolonged periods of dialysis before being transplanted. For many years, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) have been considered competitive renal replacement therapies (RRT). This dualistic vision has recently been questioned by evidence suggesting that an individualized and flexible approach may be more appropriate. In fact, tailored and cleverly planned changes between different RRT modalities, according to the patient’s needs and characteristics, are often needed in order to achieve the best results. While home HD is still under scrutiny in this particular setting, current data seems to favor the use of PD over in-center HD in patients awaiting a KT. In this specific population, the demonstrated advantages of PD are superior quality of life, longer preservation of residual renal function, lower incidence of delayed graft function, better recipient survival, and reduced cost.

Residual Renal Function - How Fast Does the Residual Urine Output Function Decline in the First Year of Haemodialysis? - A Scoping Review

Background

Haemodialysis is the most common treatment method in Australia for individuals requiring renal replacement therapy. Although it is known that the residual renal function in these patients has many advantages for their overall health outcomes and that the residual urine volume production is also declining over time, it is unknown how fast this functional decline occurs when patients are embarking on their first year on haemodialysis.

Aim

This scoping review sought to determine if the functional decline in renal residual function in the first year of haemodialysis has been previously investigated, documented or quantified.

Method

The scoping review was performed using variety of nursing and medical databases comprising MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL Plus with Full Text.

Results

The decline of renal residual function in patients on Peritoneal dialysis over the first year of treatment has previously been described, but not in detail for patients receiving haemodialysis. There is a paucity of knowledge how fast residual urine production can decline in patients receiving haemodialysis during their first year of treatment. A PRISMA checklist has been used to validate the results of this scoping review.

Conclusions

The extended preservation of renal residual function in patients on haemodialysis is crucial for their survival and may have a positive impact on their quality of life. An observational study is needed to examine how fast the functional decrease of the residual urine production function within patients receiving haemodialysis generally occurs. This information could prove to be useful in the context of treatment goals and could inform clinical practice.

Urinary Tract Infection in Hemodialysis-Dependent End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

Introduction

The aim of this study was to analyze urinalysis findings and urinary bacterial culture in hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients. The research goal was to understand the proportion, risk factors, and the causative organisms of urinary tract infection in hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients.

Materials and Methods

Between May 2020 and June 2021, this study included 100 hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients (50 male patients and 50 female patients). The urine underwent microscopic examination, pyuria was defined as ≥5 white blood cells per high-power field, and urinary bacterial cultures were conducted for patients with pyuria. Bacteriuria was defined as ≥10⁴ colony-forming units/mL in men and ≥10⁵ colony-forming units/mL in women. Daily urine output was investigated by oral listening. Postvoiding residual urine volume was measured.

Results

Fifty-six percent of male patients and 30% of female patients had normosthenuria, 24% of male patients and 38% of female patients had pyuria, and 20% of male patients and 32% of female patients had a urinary tract infection. A comparison of normosthenuria and urinary tract infection revealed no statistically significant difference in age, time on dialysis, daily urine output, and postvoiding residual urine volume. The proportion of female patients among those with normosthenuria was 34.8%, whereas the proportion of female patients among those with UTI was 61.5%. Urinary bacterial cultures showed that the major causative organisms were Escherichia coli (45%; 18/40 cultures) and extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (17.5%; 7/40 cultures).

Conclusion

The incidence of urinary tract infection was higher in female patients than in male patients. The proportion of resistant bacteria as the causative organisms was high in hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients. Urinary bacterial culture should be checked while patients are able to void urine.

Choices in hemodialysis therapies: variants, personalized therapy and application of evidence-based medicine

The extent of removal of the uremic toxins in hemodialysis (HD) therapies depends primarily on the dialysis membrane characteristics and the solute transport mechanisms involved. While designation of ‘flux’ of membranes as well toxicity of compounds that need to be targeted for removal remain unresolved issues, the relative role, efficiency and utilization of solute removal principles to optimize HD treatment are better delineated. Through the combination and intensity of diffusive and convective removal forces, levels of concentrations of a broad spectrum of uremic toxins can be lowered significantly and successfully. Extended clinical experience as well as data from several clinical trials attest to the benefits of convection-based HD treatment modalities. However, the mode of delivery of HD can further enhance the effectiveness of therapies. Other than treatment time, frequency and location that offer clinical benefits and increase patient well-being, treatment- and patient-specific criteria may be tailored for the therapy delivered: electrolytic composition, dialysate buffer and concentration and choice of anticoagulating agent are crucial for dialysis tolerance and efficacy. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) relies on three tenets, i.e. clinical expertise (i.e. doctor), patient-centered values (i.e. patient) and relevant scientific evidence (i.e. science), that have deviated from their initial aim and summarized to scientific evidence, leading to tyranny of randomized controlled trials. One must recognize that practice patterns as shown by Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study and personalization of HD care are the main driving force for improving outcomes. Based on a combination of the three pillars of EBM, and particularly on bedside patient–clinician interaction, we summarize what we have learned over the last 6 decades in terms of best practices to improve outcomes in HD patients. Management of initiation of dialysis, vascular access, preservation of kidney function, selection of biocompatible dialysers and use of dialysis fluids of high microbiological purity to restrict inflammation are just some of the approaches where clinical experience is vital in the absence of definitive scientific evidence. Further, HD adequacy needs to be considered as a broad and multitarget approach covering not just the dose of dialysis provided, but meeting individual patient needs (e.g. fluid volume, acid–base, blood pressure, bone disease metabolism control) through regular assessment—and adjustment—of a series of indicators of treatment efficiency. Finally, in whichever way new technologies (i.e. artificial intelligence, connected health) are embraced in the future to improve the delivery of dialysis, the human dimension of the patient–doctor interaction is irreplaceable. Kidney medicine should remain ‘an art’ and will never be just ‘a science’.

High Oxalate Concentrations Correlate with Increased Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of accumulating toxic terminal metabolites such as oxalate in patients with kidney failure is not well understood.

METHODS

To evaluate serum oxalate concentrations and risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in a cohort of patients with kidney failure requiring chronic dialysis, we performed a post-hoc analysis of the randomized German Diabetes Dialysis (4D) Study; this study included 1255 European patients on hemodialysis with diabetes followed-up for a median of 4 years. The results obtained via Cox proportional hazards models were confirmed by competing risk regression and restricted cubic spline modeling in the 4D Study cohort and validated in a separate cohort of 104 US patients on dialysis after a median follow-up of 2.5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 1108 patients had baseline oxalate measurements, with a median oxalate concentration of 42.4 µM. During follow-up, 548 patients died, including 139 (25.4%) from sudden cardiac death. A total of 413 patients reached the primary composite cardiovascular end point (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and fatal or nonfatal stroke). Patients in the highest oxalate quartile (≥59.7 µM) had a 40% increased risk for cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.08 to 1.81) and a 62% increased risk of sudden cardiac death (aHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.56), compared with those in the lowest quartile (≤29.6 µM). The associations remained when accounting for competing risks and with oxalate as a continuous variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum oxalate is a novel risk factor for cardiovascular events and sudden cardiac death in patients on dialysis. Further studies are warranted to test whether oxalate-lowering strategies improve cardiovascular mortality in patients on dialysis.

Multifaceted Sexual Dysfunction in Dialyzing Men and Women: Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics

Patient survival continues to increase with the growing quality of dialysis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). As such, chronic therapy must include considerations of quality of life (QOL), and this includes the disproportionate prevalence of sexual dysfunction (SD) in this patient population. This review aims to describe the pathophysiological and the psychosocial causes of SD with regard to renal replacement therapy, particularly hemo- and peritoneal dialysis. The differences in its manifestation in men and women are compared, including hormonal imbalances—and therefore fertility, libido, and sexual satisfaction—the experience of depression and anxiety, and QOL. The impact of comorbidities and the iatrogenic causes of SD are described. This review also presents validated scales for screening and diagnosis of SD in CKD patients and outlines novel therapies and strategies for the effective management of SD. Increased prevalence of CKD invariably increases the number of patients with SD, and it is crucial for health care professional teams to become familiar with the clinical tools used to manage this sensitive and under-quantified field. As a known predictor of QOL, sexual function should become a point of focus in the pursuit of patient-centered care, particularly as we seek to achieve as “normal” a life as possible for individuals who receive dialysis.

Estimating Residual Native Kidney Urea Clearance in Hemodialysis Patients with and without 24-Hour Urine Volume

Rationale & Objective

Quantification of residual native kidney function is rarely performed in patients receiving hemodialysis. Methods of estimating residual kidney urea clearance that use commonly available laboratory and clinical data, with or without urine volume information, may be useful tools.

Study Design

Retrospective, predictive modeling and model validation.

Setting & Participants

Initial timed urine collections in 604 incident in-center hemodialysis patients on thrice-weekly treatments from a single academic center in which residual kidney urea clearance is measured in usual care.

Predictors

Models using a combination of serum creatinine and urea levels, age, weight, height, sex, race, fluid weight gains, and with and without 24-hour urine volume.

Outcomes

Residual kidney urea clearance.

Analytic Approach

Generalized linear model was used for model development for residual kidney urea clearance using the first urine collection in 604 patients, as both a continuous and binary outcome (for >2.5 mL/min). Model validation was done by bootstrap resampling of the development cohort and with 1,093 follow-up measurements.

Results

Urine volume alone was the strongest predictor of residual kidney urea clearance. The model that included 24-hour urine volume with common clinical data had high diagnostic accuracy for residual kidney urea clearance > 2.5 mL/min (area under the curve, 0.91 in both development and bootstrap validation) and R² of 0.56 with outcome as a continuous residual kidney urea clearance value. Our model that did not use urine volume performed less well (eg, area under the curve, 0.75). Analyses of follow-up urine collections in these same participants yielded comparable or improved performance.

Limitations

Data were retrospective from a single center, no external validation, not validated in 2- or 4-times-weekly hemodialysis patients.

Conclusions

Estimation equations for residual kidney urea clearance that use commonly available data in dialysis clinics, with and without urine volume, may be useful tools for evaluation of hemodialysis patients who still have residual kidney function for individualization of dialysis prescriptions.

High rates of protein intake are associated with an accelerated rate of decline of residual kidney function in incident peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Preservation of residual kidney function (RKF) is a relevant objective in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The influence of dietary protein intake (PI) on this variable has not been adequately investigated.

METHODS

Following an observational design, we studied 336 patients incident on PD, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The main study variable was the mean PI [normalized rate of protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA)] during the first 4 months on PD. The main outcome variables were the absolute rate of decline of RKF and the proportion of patients presenting a >50% decay of their RKF during the first year of follow-up. We applied univariate and multivariate strategies of analysis, taking into consideration the main control variables bearing a correlation with nPNA and/or RKF.

RESULTS

Mean nPNA (first 4 months) was 1.23 ± 0.33 g/kg/day, while the overall rate of decline of RKF was -0.13 ± 0.29 mL/min/month; 69 patients (25.1%) had lost >50% of their initial RKF by the end of the first year. Univariate analysis disclosed consistent associations between the main study variable on one hand and baseline RKF (r = 0.32, P < 0.0005) and its rate of decline (r = -0.23, P < 0.0005) on the other. The latter two variables were also significantly correlated (r = -0.36, P < 0.0005). Multivariate analysis identified mean nPNA as an independent predictor of the rate of decline of RKF [odds ratio 1.09 per 0.10 g/kg/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.19, P = 0.058] and, in particular, of the probability of losing >50% of the baseline RKF during the first year of treatment (odds ratio 1.15 per 0.10 g/kg/day, 95% CI 1.04-1.27, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Higher rates of PI during the first months of therapy are associated with a faster decline of RKF among patients incident on PD. Our results underline the convenience of keeping an adequate balance between sufficient protein ingestion, to prevent malnutrition and wasting, and sensible restriction in stable, adequately nourished individuals with rates of intake in the higher range or above-recommended allowances.

Substantial renal conversion of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (droxidopa) to norepinephrine in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension

BACKGROUND

The pressor effect of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (L-DOPS, droxidopa, Northera™) results from conversion of L-DOPS to norepinephrine (NE) in cells expressing L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase (LAAAD). After L-DOPS administration the increase in systemic plasma NE is too small to explain the increase in blood pressure. Renal proximal tubular cells abundantly express LAAAD. Since NE generated locally in the kidneys could contribute to the pressor effect of L-DOPS, in this study we assessed renal conversion of L-DOPS to NE.

METHODS

Ten patients who were taking L-DOPS for symptomatic orthostatic hypotension had blood and urine sampled about 2 h after the last L-DOPS dose. L-DOPS and NE were assayed by alumina extraction followed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Data were compared in patients off vs. on levodopa/carbidopa.

RESULTS

In patients off levodopa/carbidopa the ratio of NE/L-DOPS in urine averaged 63 times that in plasma (p = 0.0009 by t test applied to log-transformed data). In marked contrast, in the three patients on levodopa/carbidopa the ratio of NE/L-DOPS in urine did not differ from that in plasma.

CONCLUSION

There is extensive renal production of NE from L-DOPS. Carbidopa seems to attenuate the conversion of L-DOPS to NE in the kidneys. Further research is needed to assess whether the proposed paracrine effect of L-DOPS in the kidneys contributes to the systemic pressor response.