Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Experimental Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Burst vs. Conventional Stimulation Paradigm

Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation, Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation, and Association of Both in Patients With Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) have individually shown efficacy in relieving pain in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2). Combining SCS and DRGS simultaneously, along with Burst stimulation programming, may enhance the responder rate of patients with PSPS-T2.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study aimed to compare the pain relief (≥50%) responder rates in SCS, DRGS, and SCS+DGRS (DUAL) through a three-month randomized cross-over trial in patients with PSPS-T2. After the cross-over period, stimulation programming was switched to Burst. Secondary objectives included evaluating the clinical efficacy at three-, four-, six-, and 12-month follow-ups, assessing pain intensity, area of pain, area of paresthesia coverage, quality of life, functional disability, psychologic distress, medication intake, and the Multidimensional Clinical Response Index (MCRI).

RESULTS

The responder rate of pain relief was similar in SCS, DRGS, and DUAL (60%, p = 0.84) at the end of the cross-over period, increasing to 80% with the ability to switch between stimulation possibilities. Burst programming did not provide additional pain relief at the four-month follow-up (p = 0.99). Clinical outcomes significantly improved until 12-month follow-up compared with baseline. Considering a clinically significant increase of 1.05 of the MCRI, all patients were responders at three-, four-, and six- month follow-up, and 80% were responders at 12 months compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The full option to stimulate different neural structures, separately or simultaneously, led to improved responder rates, allowing patients to personalize treatment. A multidimensional assessment is essential to reveal the full potential benefits of neuromodulation in patients with chronic pain.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Paradigms and Alleviation of Neuropathic Pain Behavior in Experimental Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative treatment option for painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN). Differential target multiplexed (DTM)-SCS is proposed to be more effective than conventional (Con)-SCS. Animal studies are essential for understanding SCS mechanisms in PDPN pain relief. Although the Von Frey (VF) test is the gold standard for preclinical pain research, it has limitations. Operant testing using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test provides insights into spontaneous neuropathic pain relief and enhances the translatability of findings. This study aims to 1) use the CPP test to evaluate Con- and DTM-SCS effects on spontaneous neuropathic pain relief in PDPN animals and 2) investigate the correlation between mechanical hypersensitivity alleviation and spontaneous neuropathic pain relief.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Diabetes was induced through streptozotocin injection in 32 rats; 16 animals developed PDPN and were implanted with a quadripolar lead. Rats were conditioned for Con-SCS (n = 8) or DTM-SCS (n = 7), and a preference score compared with sham was determined. After conditioning, a 30-minute SCS protocol was conducted. Mechanical sensitivity was assessed using VF before, during, and after SCS.

RESULTS

There were no significant chamber preference changes for DTM-SCS (p = 0.3449) or Con-SCS (p = 0.3632). Subgroups of responders and nonresponders were identified with significant increases in preference score for responders for both DTM-SCS (-266.6 to 119.8; p = 0.0238; n = 4) and Con-SCS (-350.7 to 88.46; p = 0.0148; n = 3). No strong correlation between SCS-induced spontaneous neuropathic pain relief and effects on mechanical hypersensitivity in PDPN animals is noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPP test is a valuable tool to test the efficacy of the pain-relieving potential of various SCS paradigms in PDPN animals. The results of this study show no differences in spontaneous neuropathic pain relief between DTM- and Con-SCS in PDPN animals. Furthermore, there is no correlation between the effect of SCS in spontaneous pain relief and hind paw mechanical hypersensitivity.

Pathophysiology of Pain and Mechanisms of Neuromodulation: A Narrative Review (A Neuron Project)

Pain serves as a vital innate defense mechanism that can significantly impact an individual's quality of life. Understanding the physiological effects of pain well plays an important role in developing novel pain treatments. Nociceptor neurons play a key role in pain and inflammation. Interactions between nociceptors and the immune system occur both at the site of injury and within the central nervous system. Modulating chemical mediators and nociceptor activity offers promising new approaches to pain management. Essentially, the sensory nervous system is essential for modulating the body's protective response, making it critical to understand these interactions to discover new pain treatment strategies. New innovations in neuromodulation have led to alternatives to opioids individuals with chronic pain with consequent improvement in disease-based treatment and nerve targeting. New neural targets from cellular and structural perspectives have revolutionized the field of neuromodulation. This narrative review aims to elucidate the mechanisms of pain transmission and processing, examine the characteristics and properties of nociceptors, and explore how the immune system influences pain perception. It further provides an updated overview of the physiology of pain and neuromodulatory mechanisms essential for managing acute and chronic pain. We assess the current understanding of different pain types, focusing on key molecules involved in each type and their physiological effects. Additionally, we compare painful and painless neuropathies and discuss the neuroimmune interactions involved in pain manifestation.

Resveratrol Modulates Diabetes-Induced Neuropathic Pain, Apoptosis, and Oxidative Neurotoxicity in Mice Through TRPV4 Channel Inhibition

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is caused by several factors, including reactive free oxygen radicals (ROS)-induced excessive Ca2+ influx. Transient receptor potential (TRP) vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) is a member of the Ca2+-permeable TRP superfamily. Resveratrol (RESV) has been extensively utilized in TRP channel regulation due to its pharmacological properties, which include antioxidant and TRP inhibitory effects. The protective function of RESV and the contribution of TRPV4 to streptozotocin (STZ)-induced neuropathic pain in mice are still unclear. Here, we evaluated the effects of RESV through the modulation of TRPV4 on Ca2+ influx, ROS-mediated pain, apoptosis, and oxidative damage in the mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRGs). From the 32 mice, four groups were induced: control, RESV, STZ, and STZ + RESV. We found that the injection of RESV reduced the changes caused by the STZ-induced stimulation of TRPV4, which in turn increased mechanical/thermal neuropathic pain, cytosolic Ca2+ influx, TRPV4 current density, oxidants (lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial ROS, and cytosolic ROS), and apoptotic markers (caspase-3, -8, and -9). The RESV injection also increased the STZ-mediated reduction of viability of DRG and the amounts of glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, vitamin A, β-carotene, and vitamin E in the brain, erythrocytes, plasma, liver, and kidney. All of these findings suggest that TRPV4 stimulation generates oxidative neurotoxicity, neuropathic pain, and apoptosis in the STZ-induced diabetic mice. On the other hand, neurotoxicity and apoptosis were reduced due to the downregulation of TRPV4 carried out through the RESV injection.

Systematic review of translational insights: Neuromodulation in animal models for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) is a prevalent and debilitating complication of diabetes, affecting a significant proportion of the diabetic population. Neuromodulation, an emerging therapeutic approach, has shown promise in the management of DPN symptoms. This systematic review aims to synthesize and analyze the current advancements in neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of DPN utilizing studies with preclinical animal models. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were focused on studies utilizing preclinical animal models for DPN that investigated the efficacy of various neuromodulation techniques, such as spinal cord stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and peripheral nerve stimulation. The findings suggest that neuromodulation significantly alleviated pain symptoms associated with DPN. Moreover, some studies reported improvements in nerve conduction velocity and reduction in nerve damage. The mechanisms underlying these effects appeared to involve modulation of pain pathways and enhancement of neurotrophic factors. However, the review also highlights the variability in methodology and stimulation parameters across studies, highlighting the need for standardization in future research. Additionally, while the results are promising, the translation of these findings from animal models to human clinical practice requires careful consideration. This review concludes that neuromodulation presents a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for DPN, but further research is necessary to optimize protocols and understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. It also emphasizes the importance of bridging the gap between preclinical findings and clinical applications to improve the management of DPN in diabetic patients.

High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz) alters sensory function and nerve fiber density in painful diabetic neuropathy: a pilot prospective open-label study

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz has provided effective pain relief and improved function in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This study aims to confirm the clinical outcomes for 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and explore its impact on objective quantitative measures of nerve pathology and function.

METHODS

This single-academic center, prospective, open-label, observational study examined the pain relief success of 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation in patients >18 years of age with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Patients underwent skin biopsies to measure intra-epidermal nerve fiber densities and corneal confocal microscopy measurements before implantation and at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Numerical rating scale for pain, visual analog scale, neuropathy pain scale, Short Form-36, and Neuropen (pin prick and monofilament) assessments were also conducted.

RESULTS

Eight patients met the criteria and were enrolled in the study. A successful trial was achieved in 7 subjects, and 6 completed the study. Significant pain relief (P < .001) was achieved at all follow-up visits. Neurological assessments showed reduced numbers of "absent" responses and increased "normal" responses from baseline to 12 months. Both proximal and distal intra-epidermal nerve fiber densities were higher at 12 months than at baseline (P < .01). Confocal microscopy measurements showed a steady increase in nerve density from baseline (188.8% increase at 12 months; P = .029).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed pain relief and improvements in sensory function after stimulation that were accompanied by increases in lower-limb intra-epidermal nerve fiber density and corneal nerve density. Further evaluation with a blinded and controlled study is needed to confirm the preliminary findings in this study.

Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience

With continued innovations in neuromodulation comes the need for evolving reviews of best practices. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has significantly improved the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and it has broad applicability across a wide range of other conditions. Through funding and organizational leadership by the American Society for Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN), this best practices consensus document has been developed for the selection, implantation, and use of DRG stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. This document is composed of a comprehensive narrative literature review that has been performed regarding the role of the DRG in chronic pain and the clinical evidence for DRG-S as a treatment for multiple pain etiologies. Best practice recommendations encompass safety management, implantation techniques, and mitigation of the potential complications reported in the literature. Looking to the future of neuromodulation, DRG-S holds promise as a robust intervention for otherwise intractable pain.

Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

The development of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of chronic diabetes that can be associated with significant disability and healthcare costs. Prompt symptom identification and aggressive glycemic control is essential in controlling the development of neuropathic complications; however, adequate pain relief remains challenging and there are considerable unmet needs in this patient population. Although guidelines have been established regarding the pharmacological management of PDN, pain control is inadequate or refractory in a high proportion of patients. Pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants (pregabalin, gabapentin) and antidepressants (duloxetine) are common first-line agents. The use of oral opioids is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and can also lead to opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Their use is therefore discouraged. There is an emerging role for neuromodulation treatment modalities including intrathecal drug delivery, spinal cord stimulation, and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Furthermore, consideration of holistic alternative therapies such as yoga and acupuncture may augment a multidisciplinary treatment approach. This aim of this review is to focus on the current management strategies for the treatment of PDN, with a discussion of treatment rationale and practical considerations for their implementation.

A Real-World Analysis of High-Frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is one of the most prevalent chronic health conditions and diabetic neuropathy one of its most prevalent and debilitating complications. While there are treatments available for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), their effectiveness is limited.

METHOD

This retrospective, multi-center, real-world review assessed pain relief and functional improvements for consecutive patients with diabetic neuropathy aged ≥18 years of age who were permanently implanted with a high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) device. Available data were extracted from a commercial database.

RESULTS

In total 89 patients consented to being included in the analysis. Sixty-one percent (54/89) of participants were male and the average age was 64.4 years (SD = 9.1). Most patients (78.7%, 70/89) identified pain primarily in their feet or legs bilaterally. At the last assessment, 79.5% (58/73) of patients were treatment responders, defined as having at least 50% patient-reported pain relief from baseline. The average time of follow-up was 21.8 months (range: 4.3 to 46.3 months). A majority of patients reported improvements in sleep and overall function relative to their baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study in typical clinical practices found 10 kHz SCS provided meaningful pain relief for a substantial proportion of patients refractory to current pDPN management, similar to published literature. This patient population has tremendous unmet needs and this study helps demonstrate the potential for 10 kHz SCS to provide an alternative pain management approach.

Novel Nanotechnological Approaches for Targeting Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) in Mitigating Diabetic Neuropathic Pain (DNP)

Diabetic neuropathy is the most entrenched complication of diabetes. Usually, it affects the distal foot and toes, which then gradually approaches the lower part of the legs. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) could be one of the worst complications of diabetes mellitus. Long-term diabetes leads to hyperglycemia, which is the utmost contributor to neuropathic pain. Hyperglycemia causing an upregulation of voltage-gated sodium channels in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) was often observed in models of neuropathic pain. DRG opening frequency increases intracellular sodium ion levels, which further causes increased calcium channel opening and stimulates other pathways leading to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Currently, pain due to diabetic neuropathy is managed via antidepressants, opioids, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogs, and topical agents such as capsaicin. Despite the availability of various treatment strategies, the percentage of patients achieving adequate pain relief remains low. Many factors contribute to this condition, such as lack of specificity and adverse effects such as light-headedness, languidness, and multiple daily doses. Therefore, nanotechnology outperforms in every aspect, providing several benefits compared to traditional therapy such as site-specific and targeted drug delivery. Nanotechnology is the branch of science that deals with the development of nanoscale materials and products, even smaller than 100 nm. Carriers can improve their efficacy with reduced side effects by incorporating drugs into the novel delivery systems. Thus, the utilization of nanotechnological approaches such as nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, gene therapy (siRNA and miRNA), and extracellular vesicles can extensively contribute to relieving neuropathic pain.

Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study)

While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to address refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2), its lack of spatial selectivity and reported discomfort due to positional effects can be considered as significant limitations. As alternatives, new waveforms, such as burst stimulation and different spatial neural targets, such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), have shown promising results. Comparisons between DRGS and standard SCS, or their combination, have never been studied on the same patients. "BOOST DRG" is the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study to compare SCS vs. DRGS vs. SCS+DRGS. Sixty-six PSPS-T2 patients will be recruited internationally in three centers. Before crossing over, patients will receive each stimulation modality for 1 month, using tonic conventional stimulation. After 3 months, stimulation will consist in switching to burst for 1 month, and patients will choose which modality/waveform they receive and will then be reassessed at 6 and 12 months. In addition to our primary outcome based on pain rating, this study is designed to assess quality of life, functional disability, psychological distress, pain surface coverage, global impression of change, medication quantification, adverse events, brain functional imaging and electroencephalography, with the objective being to provide a multidimensional insight based on composite pain assessment.

Implantable, Programmable, and Wireless Device for Electrical Stimulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Freely-Moving Rats: A Proof of Concept Study

Objective

This was a proof of concept study, based on systematic reviews of the efficacy and safety of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. The main objective was to develop an implantable, programmable, and wireless device for electrical stimulation of DRG and a methodology that can be used in translational research, especially to understand the mechanism of neuromodulation and to test new treatment modalities in animal models of pain.

Methods

We developed and tested a stimulator that uses a battery-powered microelectronic circuit, to generate constant current square biphasic or monophasic pulsed waveform of variable amplitudes and duration. It is controlled by software and an external controller that allows radio frequency communication with the stimulator. The stimulator was implanted in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. The lead was positioned at the L5 DRG level, while the stimulator was placed in the skin pocket at the ipsilateral side. Forty-five animals were used and divided into six groups: spinal nerve ligation (SNL), chronic compression injury of the DRG (CCD), SNL + active DRG stimulation, intact control group, group with the implanted sham stimulator, and sham lead. Behavioral testing was performed on the day preceding surgery and three times postoperatively (1st, 3rd, and 7th day).

Results

In animals with SNL, neurostimulation reduced pain-related behavior, tested with pinprick hyperalgesia, pinprick withdrawal test, and cold test, while the leads per se did not cause DRG compression. The rats well tolerated the stimulator. It did not hinder animal movement, and it enabled the animals to be housed under regular conditions.

Conclusion

A proof-of-concept experiment with our stimulator verified the usability of the device. The stimulator enables a wide range of research applications from adjusting stimulation parameters for different pain conditions, studying new stimulation methods with different frequencies and waveforms to obtain knowledge about analgesic mechanisms of DRG stimulation.

A narrative review and future considerations of spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglion stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, neuromodulation has experienced a renaissance. Novel waveforms and anatomic targets show potential improvements in therapy that may signify substantial benefits. New innovations in peripheral nerve stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation have shown prospective evidence and sustainability of results. Sub-perception physiologic bursting, high-frequency stimulation and feedback loop mechanisms provide significant benefits over traditional tonic spinal cords stimulation (SCS) in peer reviewed investigations. We reviewed the themes associated with novel technology in the context of historical stalwart publications.

RECENT FINDINGS

New innovations have led to better nerve targeting, improvements in disease-based treatment, and opioid alternatives for those in chronic pain. In addition, new neural targets from both structural and cellular perspectives have changed the field of Neurostimulation.

SUMMARY

For many years, tonic SCS was representative of neuromodulation, but as this review examines, the progression of the field in the past decade has reshaped patient options.

Conventional Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Quantitative Immunocytochemical Analysis of Intracellular γ-Aminobutyric Acid in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons

Background and Objective

The sensory cell somata in the DRG contain all equipment necessary for extensive GABAergic signaling and are able to release GABA upon depolarization. With this study, we hypothesize that pain relief induced by conventional dorsal root ganglion stimulation (Con‐DRGS) in animals with experimental painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is related to the release of GABA from DRG neurons. With use of quantitative immunocytochemistry, we hypothesize DRGS to result in a decreased intensity of intracellular GABA‐immunostaining in DRG somata.

Materials and Methods

Female Sprague‐Dawley rats (n = 31) were injected with streptozotocin (STZ) in order to induce Diabetes Mellitus. Animals that developed neuropathic pain after four weeks (Von Frey) were implanted with a unilateral DRGS device at L4 (n = 14). Animals were then stimulated for 30 min with Con‐DRGS (20 Hz, pulse width = 0.2 msec, amplitude = 67% of motor threshold, n = 8) or Sham‐DRGS (n = 6), while pain behavior (von Frey) was measured. DRGs were then collected and immunostained for GABA, and a relation to size of sensory cell soma diameter (small: 12–26 μm, assumed to be C‐fiber related sensory neurons; medium: 26–40 μm, assumed to be Aδ related sensory neurons; and large: 40–54 μm, assumed to be Aβ related sensory neurons) was made.

Results

DRGS treated animals showed significant reductions in STZ‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity. No significant differences in GABA immunostaining intensity per sensory neuron cell soma type (small‐, medium‐, or large‐sized) were noted in DRGs of stimulated (Con‐DRGS) animals versus Sham animals. No differences in GABA immunostaining intensity per sensory cell soma type in ipsi‐ as compared to contralateral DRGs were observed.

Conclusion

Con‐DRGS does not affect the average intracellular GABA immunofluorescence staining intensity in DRG sensory neurons of those animals which showed significant pain reduction. Similarly, no soma size related changes in intracellular GABA immunofluorescence were observed following Con‐DRGS.

Brain fMRI during orientation selective epidural spinal cord stimulation

Epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) is widely used for chronic pain treatment, and is also a promising tool for restoring motor function after spinal cord injury. Despite significant positive impact of ESCS, currently available protocols provide limited specificity and efficiency partially due to the limited number of contacts of the leads and to the limited flexibility to vary the spatial distribution of the stimulation field in respect to the spinal cord. Recently, we introduced Orientation Selective (OS) stimulation strategies for deep brain stimulation, and demonstrated their selectivity in rats using functional MRI (fMRI). The method achieves orientation selectivity by controlling the main direction of the electric field gradients using individually driven channels. Here, we introduced a similar OS approach for ESCS, and demonstrated orientation dependent brain activations as detected by brain fMRI. The fMRI activation patterns during spinal cord stimulation demonstrated the complexity of brain networks stimulated by OS-ESCS paradigms, involving brain areas responsible for the transmission of the motor and sensory information. The OS approach may allow targeting ESCS to spinal fibers of different orientations, ultimately making stimulation less dependent on the precision of the electrode implantation.

Neuromodulation With Thoracic Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmogenicity

Introduction: Sympathetic hyperactivity is strongly associated with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Neuromodulation provides therapeutic options for ventricular arrhythmias by modulating cardiospinal reflexes and reducing sympathetic output at the level of the spinal cord. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a recent neuromodulatory approach; however, its role in reducing ventricular arrhythmias has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine if DRGS can reduce cardiac sympathoexcitation and the indices for ventricular arrhythmogenicity induced by programmed ventricular extrastimulation. We evaluated the efficacy of thoracic DRGS at both low (20 Hz) and high (1 kHz) stimulation frequencies. Methods: Cardiac sympathoexcitation was induced in Yorkshire pigs (n = 8) with ventricular extrastimulation (S1/S2 pacing), before and after DRGS. A DRG-stimulating catheter was placed at the left T2 spinal level, and animals were randomized to receive low-frequency (20 Hz and 0.4 ms) or high-frequency (1 kHz and 0.03 ms) DRGS for 30 min. High-fidelity cardiac electrophysiological recordings were performed with an epicardial electrode array measuring the indices of ventricular arrhythmogenicity-activation recovery intervals (ARIs), electrical restitution curve (S_max), and Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-Te interval). Results: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation, at both 20 Hz and 1 kHz, decreased S1/S2 pacing-induced ARI shortening (20 Hz DRGS -21±7 ms, Control -50±9 ms, P = 0.007; 1 kHz DRGS -13 ± 2 ms, Control -46 ± 8 ms, P = 0.001). DRGS also reduced arrhythmogenicity as measured by a decrease in S_max (20 Hz DRGS 0.5 ± 0.07, Control 0.7 ± 0.04, P = 0.006; 1 kHz DRGS 0.5 ± 0.04, Control 0.7 ± 0.03, P = 0.007), and a decrease in Tp-Te interval/QTc (20 Hz DRGS 2.7 ± 0.13, Control 3.3 ± 0.12, P = 0.001; 1 kHz DRGS 2.8 ± 0.08, Control; 3.1 ± 0.03, P = 0.007). Conclusions: In a porcine model, we show that thoracic DRGS decreased cardiac sympathoexcitation and indices associated with ventricular arrhythmogenicity during programmed ventricular extrastimulation. In addition, we demonstrate that both low-frequency and high-frequency DRGS can be effective neuromodulatory approaches for reducing cardiac excitability during sympathetic hyperactivity.

Nonlinear Relation Between Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Amplitude and Behavioral Outcome in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Background and objective

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has recently emerged as a neuromodulation modality in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of different Burst‐DRGS amplitudes in an experimental model of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN).

Methods

Diabetes mellitus was induced in female Sprague–Dawley rats by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, n = 28). Animals were tested for mechanical hypersensitivity (von Frey paw withdrawal test) before, and four weeks after STZ injection. PDPN rats (n = 13) were implanted with a unilateral bipolar electrode at the L5 DRG. Animals received Burst‐DRGS at 0%, 10%, 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% of motor threshold (MT) in a randomized crossover design on post‐implantation days 2–7 (n = 9). Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed before stimulation onset, 15 and 30 min during stimulation, and 15 and 30 min after stimulation.

Results

Burst‐DRGS at amplitudes of 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% MT resulted in significant attenuation of STZ‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity at 15 and 30 min during stimulation, as well as 15 min after cessation of stimulation. No effect on mechanical hypersensitivity was observed for Burst‐DRGS at 0% MT and 10% MT. Optimal pain relief and highest responder rates were achieved with Burst‐DRGS at 50–66% MT, with an estimated optimum at 52% MT.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate a nonlinear relationship between Burst‐DRGS amplitude and behavioral outcome, with an estimated optimal amplitude of 52% MT. Further optimization and analysis of DRGS driven by insights into the underlying mechanisms related to the various stimulation paradigms is warranted.

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Experimental Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: Delayed Wash-Out of Pain Relief After Low-Frequency (1Hz) Stimulation

OBJECTIVE

Up until now there is little data about the pain relieving effect of different frequency settings in DRGS. The aim of this study was to compare the pain relieving effect of DRGS at low-, mid-, and high-frequencies and Sham-DRGS in an animal model of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDPN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Diabetes mellitus was induced by an intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin in 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 24; glucose ≥15 mmol/L: n = 20; mechanical hypersensitivity: n = 15). Five weeks later, a DRGS device was implanted at the L5 DRG. Ten animals were included for stimulation, alternating 30 minutes of low (1 Hz)-, mid (20 Hz)-, and high (1000 Hz)-frequencies and Sham-DRGS during four days, with a pulse width of 0.2 msec (average amplitude: 0.19 ± 0.01 mA), using a randomized cross-over design. The effect on mechanical hypersensitivity of the hind paw to von Frey filaments was evaluated.

RESULTS

All DRGS frequencies resulted in a complete reversal of mechanical hypersensitivity and "a clinically relevant reduction" was achieved in 70-80% of animals. No significant differences in maximal pain relieving effect were found between the different frequency treatments (p = 0.24). Animals stimulated at 1000 and 20 Hz returned to baseline mechanical hypersensitivity values 15 and 30 min after stimulation cessation, respectively, while animals stimulated at 1 Hz did not.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that DRGS is equally effective when applied at low-, mid-, and high-frequency in an animal model of PDPN. However, low-frequency-(1 Hz)-DRGS resulted in a delayed wash-out effect, which suggests that this is the most optimal frequency for pain therapy in PDPN as compared to mid- and high-frequency.