Bipolar Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential and Parkinsonian Tremor

Evaluation of the Rotational Stability of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: A Case Series and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The rotational stability of directional deep brain stimulation leads is a major prerequisite for sustained clinical effects. Data on directional lead stability are limited and controversial.

METHODS

 We aimed to evaluate the long-term rotational stability of directional leads and define confounding factors in our own population and the current literature. We retrospectively evaluated the orientation of directional leads in patients with available postoperative computed tomography (CT; T1; day of surgery) and an additional postoperative image (T2; CT or rotational fluoroscopy) performed more than 7 days after the initial scan. The potential impact of intracranial air was assessed. We also reviewed the literature to define factors impacting stability.

RESULTS

 Thirty-six leads were evaluated. The mean follow-up between T1 and T2 was 413.3 (7-1,171) days. The difference in rotation between T1 and T2 was 2.444 ± 2.554 degrees (range: 0-9.0 degrees). The volume of intracranial air did not impact the rotation. The literature search identified one factor impacting the stability of directional leads, which is the amount of twist applied at implantation.

CONCLUSION

 Directional leads for deep brain stimulation show stable long-term orientation after implantation. Based on our literature review, large amounts of twist during implantation can lead to delayed rotation and should thus be avoided.

Model-based closed-loop control of thalamic deep brain stimulation

Introduction: Closed-loop control of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is beneficial for effective and automatic treatment of various neurological disorders like Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Manual (open-loop) DBS programming solely based on clinical observations relies on neurologists' expertise and patients' experience. Continuous stimulation in open-loop DBS may decrease battery life and cause side effects. On the contrary, a closed-loop DBS system uses a feedback biomarker/signal to track worsening (or improving) of patients' symptoms and offers several advantages compared to the open-loop DBS system. Existing closed-loop DBS control systems do not incorporate physiological mechanisms underlying DBS or symptoms, e.g., how DBS modulates dynamics of synaptic plasticity. Methods: In this work, we propose a computational framework for development of a model-based DBS controller where a neural model can describe the relationship between DBS and neural activity and a polynomial-based approximation can estimate the relationship between neural and behavioral activities. A controller is used in our model in a quasi-real-time manner to find DBS patterns that significantly reduce the worsening of symptoms. By using the proposed computational framework, these DBS patterns can be tested clinically by predicting the effect of DBS before delivering it to the patient. We applied this framework to the problem of finding optimal DBS frequencies for essential tremor given electromyography (EMG) recordings solely. Building on our recent network model of ventral intermediate nuclei (Vim), the main surgical target of the tremor, in response to DBS, we developed neural model simulation in which physiological mechanisms underlying Vim-DBS are linked to symptomatic changes in EMG signals. By using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, we showed that a closed-loop system can track EMG signals and adjust the stimulation frequency of Vim-DBS so that the power of EMG reaches a desired control target. Results and discussion: We demonstrated that the model-based DBS frequency aligns well with that used in clinical studies. Our model-based closed-loop system is adaptable to different control targets and can potentially be used for different diseases and personalized systems.

Modeling Instantaneous Firing Rate of Deep Brain Stimulation Target Neuronal Ensembles in the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders, including Parkinson disease and essential tremor. However, the underlying mechanisms of DBS remain elusive. Despite the capability of existing models in interpreting experimental data qualitatively, there are very few unified computational models that quantitatively capture the dynamics of the neuronal activity of varying stimulated nuclei-including subthalamic nucleus (STN), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), and ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim)-across different DBS frequencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both synthetic and experimental data were used in the model fitting; the synthetic data were generated by an established spiking neuron model that was reported in our previous work, and the experimental data were provided using single-unit microelectrode recordings (MERs) during DBS (microelectrode stimulation). Based on these data, we developed a novel mathematical model to represent the firing rate of neurons receiving DBS, including neurons in STN, SNr, and Vim-across different DBS frequencies. In our model, the DBS pulses were filtered through a synapse model and a nonlinear transfer function to formulate the firing rate variability. For each DBS-targeted nucleus, we fitted a single set of optimal model parameters consistent across varying DBS frequencies.

RESULTS

Our model accurately reproduced the firing rates observed and calculated from both synthetic and experimental data. The optimal model parameters were consistent across different DBS frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of our model fitting was in agreement with experimental single-unit MER data during DBS. Reproducing neuronal firing rates of different nuclei of the basal ganglia and thalamus during DBS can be helpful to further understand the mechanisms of DBS and to potentially optimize stimulation parameters based on their actual effects on neuronal activity.

Directional electrodes in deep brain stimulation: Results of a survey by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS)

Introduction

Directional Leads (dLeads) represent a new technical tool in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), and a rapidly growing population of patients receive dLeads.

Research question

The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies(EANS) functional neurosurgery Task Force on dLeads conducted a survey of DBS specialists in Europe to evaluate their use, applications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Material and methods

EANS functional neurosurgery and European Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ESSFN) members were asked to complete an online survey with 50 multiple-choice and open questions on their use of dLeads in clinical practice.

Results

Forty-nine respondents from 16 countries participated in the survey (n = 38 neurosurgeons, n = 8 neurologists, n = 3 DBS nurses). Five had not used dLeads. All users reported that dLeads provided an advantage (n = 23 minor, n = 21 major). Most surgeons (n = 35) stated that trajectory planning does not differ when implanting dLeads or conventional leads. Most respondents selected dLeads for the ability to optimize stimulation parameters (n = 41). However, the majority (n = 24), regarded time-consuming programming as the main disadvantage of this technology. Innovations that were highly valued by most participants included full 3T MRI compatibility, remote programming, and closed loop technology.

Discussion and conclusion

Directional leads are widely used by European DBS specialists. Despite challenges with programming time, users report that dLeads have had a positive impact and maintain an optimistic view of future technological advances.

Improved Side-Effect Stimulation Thresholds and Postoperative Transient Confusion With Asleep, Image-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Asleep, image-guided deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a modern alternative to awake, microelectrode recording (MER) guidance. Studies demonstrate comparable efficacy and complications between techniques, although some report lower stimulation thresholds for side effects with image guidance. In addition, few studies directly compare the risk of postoperative transient confusion (pTC) across techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical efficacy, stimulation thresholds for side effects, and rates of pTC with MER-guided DBS vs intraoperative 3D-fluoroscopy (i3D-F) guidance in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from 2006 to 2021 were identified from the departmental database and grouped as having either MER-guided DBS or i3D-F-guided DBS insertion. Directional leads were used once commercially available. Changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin scores, and stimulation thresholds were assessed, as were rates of complications including pTC.

RESULTS

MER guidance was used to implant 487 electrodes (18 globus pallidus interna, GPi; 171 subthalamic nucleus; 76 ventrointermediate thalamus, VIM) in 265 patients. i3D-F guidance was used in 167 electrodes (19 GPi; 25 subthalamic nucleus; 41 VIM) in 85 patients. There were no significant differences in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating III Scale, levodopa equivalent daily dose, or Fahn-Tolosa-Marin between groups. Stimulation thresholds for side effects were higher with i3D-F guidance in the subthalamic nucleus (MER, 2.80 mA ± 0.98; i3D-F, 3.46 mA ± 0.92; P = .002) and VIM (MER, 2.81 mA ± 1.00; i3D-F, 3.19 mA ± 1.03; P = .0018). Less pTC with i3D-F guidance (MER, 7.5%; i3D-F, 1.2%; P = .034) was also found.

CONCLUSION

Although clinical efficacy between MER-guided and i3D-F-guided DBS was comparable, thresholds for stimulation side effects were higher with i3D-F guidance and the rate of pTC was lower. This suggests that image-guided DBS may affect long-term side effects and pose a decreased risk of pTC.

Directional deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and constraints-an analytical appraisal

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely employed treatment for Parkinson's disease. However, conventional DBS utilizing ring-shaped leads can often result in undesirable side effects by stimulating nearby brain structures, thus limiting its effectiveness. To address this issue, a novel DBS electrode was developed to allow for directional stimulation, avoiding neighboring structures. This literature review aims to analyze the disparities between conventional and directional DBS and discuss the benefits and limitations associated with this innovative electrode design, focusing on the stimulation-induced side effects it can or cannot mitigate. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO databases using the Boolean search criteria: "Deep brain stimulation" AND "Parkinson" AND "Directional." Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the selected articles were downloaded for full-text reading. Subsequently, the results were organized and analyzed to compose this article. Numerous studies have demonstrated that directional DBS effectively reduces side effects associated with brain stimulation, prevents the stimulation of non-targeted structures, and expands the therapeutic window, among other advantages. However, it has been observed that directional DBS may be more challenging to program and requires higher energy consumption. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardization among different manufacturers of directional DBS electrodes. Various stimulation-induced side effects, including dysarthria, dyskinesia, paresthesias, and symptoms of pyramidal tract activation, have been shown to be mitigated with the use of directional DBS. Moreover, directional electrodes offer a wider therapeutic window and a reduced incidence of undesired effects, requiring the same or lower minimum current for symptom relief compared to conventional DBS. The utilization of directional leads in DBS offers numerous advantages over conventional electrodes without significant drawbacks for patients undergoing directional DBS therapy.

Surgical Advances in Parkinson's Disease

While symptomatic pharmacological therapy remains the main therapeutic strategy for Parkinson's disease (PD), over the last two decades, surgical approaches have become more commonly used to control levodopa-induced motor complications and dopamine-resistant and non-motor symptoms of PD. In this paper, we discuss old and new surgical treatments for PD and the many technological innovations in this field. We have initially reviewed the relevant surgical anatomy as well as the pathological signaling considered to be the underlying cause of specific symptoms of PD. Subsequently, early attempts at surgical symptom control will be briefly reviewed. As the most well-known surgical intervention for PD is deep brain stimulation, this subject is discussed at length. As deciding on whether a patient stands to benefit from DBS can be quite difficult, the different proposed paradigms for precisely this are covered. Following this, the evidence regarding different targets, especially the subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus, is reviewed as well as the evidence for newer proposed targets for specific symptoms. Due to the rapidly expanding nature of knowledge and technological capabilities, some of these new and potential future capabilities are given consideration in terms of their current and future use. Following this, we have reviewed newer treatment modalities, especially magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound and other potential surgical therapies, such as spinal cord stimulation for gait symptoms and others. As mentioned, the field of surgical alleviation of symptoms of PD is undergoing a rapid expansion, and this review provides a general overview of the current status and future directions in the field.

A review of neurophysiological effects and efficiency of waveform parameters in deep brain stimulation

Neurostimulation has diverse clinical applications and potential as a treatment for medically refractory movement disorders, epilepsy, and other neurological disorders. However, the parameters used to program electrodes-polarity, pulse width, amplitude, and frequency-and how they are adjusted have remained largely untouched since the 1970 s. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and highlights the need for further research to uncover the physiological mechanisms of neurostimulation. We focus on studies that reveal the potential for clinicians to use waveform parameters to selectively stimulate neural tissue for therapeutic benefit, while avoiding activating tissue associated with adverse effects. DBS uses cathodic monophasic rectangular pulses with passive recharging in clinical practice to treat neurological conditions such as Parkinson's Disease. However, research has shown that stimulation efficiency can be improved, and side effects reduced, through modulating parameters and adding novel waveform properties. These developments can prolong implantable pulse generator lifespan, reducing costs and surgery-associated risks. Waveform parameters can stimulate neurons based on axon orientation and intrinsic structural properties, providing clinicians with more precise targeting of neural pathways. These findings could expand the spectrum of diseases treatable with neuromodulation and improve patient outcomes.

Directional Deep Brain Stimulation-A Step in the Right Direction? A Systematic Review of the Clinical and Therapeutic Efficacy of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND

The use of directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) electrodes for the treatment of movement disorders such as Parkinson disease (PD) has become relatively widespread. However, the efficacy of dDBS relative to its omnidirectional deep brain stimulation (oDBS) counterpart is not well characterized. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature comparing clinical and therapeutic outcomes of dDBS relative to oDBS in patients with PD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for studies with comparative clinical outcome data between dDBS and oDBS was performed across the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Data including therapeutic window (TW) and surrogate measures and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score were collected and summarized across multiple time periods.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. Three of these studies evaluated motor performance in the form of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III, with none finding differences between dDBS and oDBS. Two studies assessed quality-of-life measures with neither finding differences between dDBS and oDBS. TW or a surrogate measure was assessed in 6 studies; 5 studies found an increase or strong trend toward increase in dDBS relative to oDBS.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence, although limited by bias, does suggest that dDBS in the treatment of PD yields improvements in motor symptoms and quality of life that are comparable to oDBS; TW and surrogate measures are consistently improved in patients with PD under a directional configuration relative to omnidirectional.

An in-silico assessment of efficacy of two novel intra-cardiac electrode configurations versus traditional anti-tachycardia pacing therapy for terminating sustained ventricular tachycardia

The implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is an effective direct therapy for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia (VT). Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) is often applied by the ICD as the first mode of therapy, but is often found to be ineffective, particularly for fast VTs. In such cases, strong, painful and damaging backup defibrillation shocks are applied by the device. Here, we propose two novel electrode configurations: "bipolar" and "transmural" which both combine the concept of targeted shock delivery with the advantage of reduced energy required for VT termination. We perform an in silico study to evaluate the efficacy of VT termination by applying one single (low-energy) monophasic shock from each novel configuration, comparing with conventional ATP therapy. Both bipolar and transmural configurations are able to achieve a higher efficacy (93% and 85%) than ATP (45%), with energy delivered similar to and two orders of magnitudes smaller than conventional ICD defibrillation shocks, respectively. Specifically, the transmural configuration (which applies the shock vector directly across the scar substrate sustaining the VT) is most efficient, requiring typically less than 1 J shock energy to achieve a high efficacy. The efficacy of both bipolar and transmural configurations are higher when applied to slow VTs (100% and 97%) compared to fast VTs (57% and 29%). Both novel electrode configurations introduced are able to improve electrotherapy efficacy while reducing the overall number of required therapies and need for strong backup shocks.

Surgical Strategy for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for drug-resistant involuntary movements. However, the conventional quadripole cylindrical lead creates electrical fields in all directions, and the resulting spread to adjacent eloquent structures may induce unintended effects. Novel directional leads have therefore been designed to allow directional stimulation (DS). Directional leads have the advantage of widening the therapeutic window (TW), compensating for slight misplacement of the lead and requiring less electrical power to provide the same effect as a cylindrical lead. Conversely, the increase in the number of contacts from four to eight and the addition of directional elements has made stimulation programming more complex. For these reasons, new treatment strategies are required to allow effective directional DBS. During lead implantation, the directional segment should be placed in a "sweet spot," and the orientation of the directional segment is important for programming. Trial-and-error testing of a large number of contacts is unnecessary, and efficient and systematic execution of the programmed procedure is desirable. Recent improvements in imaging technologies have enabled image-guided programming. In the future, optimal stimulations are expected to be programmed by directional recording of local field potentials.

Determining an efficient deep brain stimulation target in essential tremor - Cohort study and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly efficacious treatment for essential tremor (ET). Still, the optimal anatomical target in the (sub)thalamic area is a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal target of DBS for ET regarding beneficial clinical outcome and impact on activities of daily living as well as stimulation-induced side effects and compare it with previously published coordinates.

METHODS

In 30 ET patients undergoing bilateral DBS, severity of tremor was assessed by blinded video ratings before and at 1-year follow-up with DBS ON and OFF. Tremor scores and reported side effects and volumes of tissue activated were used to create a probabilistic map of DBS efficiency and side effects.

RESULTS

DBS was effective both in tremor suppression as well as in improving patient reported outcomes, which were positively correlated. The "sweet spot" for tremor suppression was located inferior of the VIM in the subthalamic area, close to the superior margin of the zona incerta. The Euclidean distance of active contacts to this spot as well as to 10 of 13 spots from the literature review was predictive of individual outcome. A cluster associated with the occurrence of ataxia was located in direct vicinity of the "sweet spot".

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the highest clinical efficacy of DBS in the posterior subthalamic area, lining up with previously published targets likely representing the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract. Side effects may not necessarily indicate lead misplacement, but should encourage clinicians to employ novel DBS programing options.

Tremor and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Essential Tremor Before and After Replacing Their Standard Deep Brain Stimulation With a Directional System

OBJECTIVES

Patients with essential tremor treated with thalamic deep brain stimulation may experience increased tremor with the progression of their disease. Initially, this can be counteracted with increased stimulation. Eventually, this may cause unwanted side-effects as the circumferential stimulation from a standard ring contact spreads into adjacent regions. Directional leads may offer a solution to this clinical problem. We aimed to compare the ability of a standard and a directional system to reduce tremor without side-effects and to improve the quality of life for patients with advanced essential tremor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six advanced essential tremor patients with bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation had their standard system replaced with a directional system. Tremor rating scale scores were prospectively evaluated before and after the replacement surgery. Secondary analyses of quality of life related to tremor, voice, and general health were assessed.

RESULTS

There was a significantly greater reduction in tremor without side-effects (p = 0.017) when using the directional system. There were improvements in tremor (p = 0.031) and voice (p = 0.037) related quality of life but not in general health for patients using optimized stimulation settings with the directional system compared to the standard system.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of advanced essential tremor patients who no longer had ideal tremor reduction with a standard system, replacing their deep brain stimulation with a directional system significantly improved their tremor and quality of life. Up-front implantation of directional deep brain stimulation leads may provide better tremor control in those patients who progress at a later time point.

Potentials and Limitations of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation: A Simulation Approach

BACKGROUND

Directional leads are increasingly used in deep brain stimulation. They allow shaping the electrical field in the axial plane. These new possibilities increase the complexity of programming. Thus, optimized programming approaches are needed to assist clinical testing and to obtain full clinical benefit.

OBJECTIVES

This simulation study investigates to what extent the electrical field can be shaped by directional steering to compensate for lead malposition.

METHOD

Binary volumes of tissue activated (VTA) were simulated, by using a finite element method approach, for different amplitude distributions on the three directional electrodes. VTAs were shifted from 0 to 2 mm at different shift angles with respect to the lead orientation, to determine the best compensation of a target volume.

RESULTS

Malpositions of 1 mm can be compensated with the highest gain of overlap with directional leads. For larger shifts, an improvement of overlap of 10-30% is possible, depending on the stimulation amplitude and shift angle of the lead. Lead orientation and shift determine the amplitude distribution of the electrodes.

CONCLUSION

To get full benefit from directional leads, both the shift angle as well as the shift to target volume are required to choose the correct amplitude distribution on the electrodes. Current directional leads have limitations when compensating malpositions >1 mm; however, they still outperform conventional leads in reducing overstimulation. Further, their main advantage probably lies in the reduction of side effects. Databases like the one from this simulation could serve for optimized lead programming algorithms in the future.

Temporal Stability of Lead Orientation in Directional Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) enlarges the therapeutic window by increasing side-effect thresholds and improving clinical benefits. To determine the optimal stimulation settings and interpret clinical observations, knowledge of the lead orientation in relation to the patient's anatomy is required.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if directional leads remain in a fixed orientation after implantation or whether orientation changes over time.

METHOD

Clinical records of 187 patients with directional DBS electrodes were screened for CT scans in addition to the routine postoperative CT. The orientation angle of each electrode at a specific point in time was reconstructed from CT artifacts using the DiODe algorithm implemented in Lead-DBS. The orientation angles over time were compared with the originally measured orientations from the routine postoperative CT.

RESULTS

Multiple CT scans were identified in 18 patients and the constancy of the orientation angle was determined for 29 leads at 48 points in time. The median time difference between the observations and the routine postoperative CT scan was 82 (range 1-811) days. The mean difference of the orientation angles compared to the initial measurement was -1.1 ± 3.9° (range -7.6 to 8.7°). Linear regression showed no relevant drift of the absolute value of the orientation angle over time (0.8°/year, adjusted R2: 0.040, p = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

The orientation of directional leads was stable and showed no clinically relevant changes either in the first weeks after implantation or over longer periods of time.

Beneficial effect of 24-month bilateral subthalamic stimulation on quality of sleep in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves quality of life (QoL), motor, and sleep symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the long-term effects of STN-DBS on sleep and its relationship with QoL outcome are unclear.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, multicenter study including 73 PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS, we examined PDSleep Scale (PDSS), PDQuestionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), Scales for Outcomes in PD-motor examination, -activities of daily living, and -complications (SCOPA-A, -B, -C), and levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) preoperatively, at 5 and 24 months follow-up. Longitudinal changes were analyzed with Friedman-tests or repeated-measures ANOVA, when parametric tests were applicable, and Bonferroni-correction for multiple comparisons. Post-hoc, visits were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank/t-tests. The magnitude of clinical responses was investigated using effect size.

RESULTS

Significant beneficial effects of STN-DBS were observed for PDSS, PDQ-8, SCOPA-A, -B, and -C. All outcomes improved significantly at 5 months with subsequent decrements in gains at 24 months follow-up which were significant for PDSS, PDQ-8, and SCOPA-B. Comparing baseline and 24 months follow-up, we observed significant improvements of PDSS (small effect), SCOPA-A (moderate effect), -C, and LEDD (large effects). PDSS and PDQ-8 improvements correlated significantly at 5 and 24 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study with a 24 months follow-up, we report significant sustained improvements after bilateral STN-DBS using a PD-specific sleep scale and a significant relationship between sleep and QoL improvements. This highlights the importance of sleep in holistic assessments of DBS outcomes.