Severely impaired gastric accommodation is a hallmark of post-Nissen functional dyspepsia symptoms

Regurgitation, eructation, and supragastric belch: retrograde esophageal motility, disorders, and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes pathologic conditions of retrograde flow into the esophagus along with recent therapeutic advances and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The esophagus facilitates anterograde and retrograde movement of contents, the latter of which is mediated by transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often includes esophageal-specific symptoms such as heartburn or regurgitation. Volume regurgitation responds less frequently to acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) than heartburn, given its relationship with incompetence of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and increased frequency of TLESRs. Therefore, although the refluxate pH can be altered with PPIs, the frequency of reflux episodes is generally not reduced and surgical and endoscopic treatments may be favored. Other instances of abnormal retrograde esophageal flow respond better to medical therapy, or lifestyle interventions. Compared to gastric belching because of increased stomach distension, supragastric belching is caused by intake of air from pharynx into the esophagus followed by rapid expulsion of air. These conditions can be distinguished on esophageal tests such as high-resolution manometry and are likely to respond to behavioral modifications.

SUMMARY

Retrograde flow into the esophagus can be a normal occurrence, but diagnostic testing to distinguish causes can guide appropriate intervention.

Characterization of gastric dysfunction after fundoplication using body surface gastric mapping

BACKGROUND

Adverse gastric symptoms persist in up to 20% of fundoplication operations completed for gastroesophageal reflux disease, causing significant morbidity and driving the need for revisional procedures. Noninvasive techniques to assess the mechanisms of persistent postoperative symptoms are lacking. This study aimed to investigate gastric myoelectrical abnormalities and symptoms in patients after fundoplication using a novel noninvasive body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) device.

METHODS

Patients with a previous fundoplication operation and ongoing significant gastroduodenal symptoms and matched controls were included. BSGM using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry Ltd) was employed, consisting of a high-resolution 64-channel array, validated symptom-logging application, and wearable reader.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with significant chronic symptoms after fundoplication were recruited, with 16 matched controls. Overall, 6 of 16 patients (37.5%) showed significant spectral abnormalities defined by unstable gastric myoelectrical activity (n = 2), abnormally high gastric frequencies (n = 3), or high gastric amplitudes (n = 1). Patients with spectral abnormalities had higher Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index scores than those of patients without spectral abnormalities (3.2 [range, 2.8-3.6] vs 2.3 [range, 2.2-2.8], respectively; P = .024). Moreover, 7 of 16 patients (43.8%) had BSGM test results suggestive of gut-brain axis contributions and without myoelectrical dysfunction. Increasing Principal Gastric Frequency Deviation and decreasing Rhythm Index scores were associated with symptom severity (r > .40; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

A significant number of patients with persistent postfundoplication symptoms displayed abnormal gastric function on BSGM testing, which correlated with symptom severity. Our findings advance the pathophysiologic understanding of postfundoplication disorders, which may inform diagnosis and patient selection for medical therapy and revisional procedures.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Evaluation and Management of Belching, Abdominal Bloating, and Distention: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Belching, bloating, and abdominal distention are all highly prevalent gastrointestinal symptoms and account for some of the most common reasons for patient visits to outpatient gastroenterology practices. These symptoms are often debilitating, affecting patients' quality of life, and contributing to work absenteeism. Belching and bloating differ in their pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management, and there is limited evidence available for their various treatments. Therefore, the purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update is to provide best practice advice based on both controlled trials and observational data for clinicians covering clinical features, diagnostics, and management considerations that include dietary, gut-directed behavioral, and drug therapies.

METHODS

This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These best practice advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature based on clinical trials, the more robust observational studies, and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these best practice advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinical history and physical examination findings and impedance pH monitoring can help to differentiate between gastric and supragastric belching. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Treatment options for supragastric belching may include brain-gut behavioral therapies, either separately or in combination, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, diaphragmatic breathing, speech therapy, and central neuromodulators. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Rome IV criteria should be used to diagnose primary abdominal bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Carbohydrate enzyme deficiencies may be ruled out with dietary restriction and/or breath testing. In a small subset of at-risk patients, small bowel aspiration and glucose- or lactulose-based hydrogen breath testing may be used to evaluate for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Serologic testing may rule out celiac disease in patients with bloating and, if serologies are positive, a small bowel biopsy should be done to confirm the diagnosis. A gastroenterology dietitian should be part of the multidisciplinary approach to care for patients with celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Abdominal imaging and upper endoscopy should be ordered in patients with alarm features, recent worsening symptoms, or an abnormal physical examination only. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Gastric emptying studies should not be ordered routinely for bloating and distention, but may be considered if nausea and vomiting are present. Whole gut motility and radiopaque transit studies should not be ordered unless other additional and treatment-refractory lower gastrointestinal symptoms exist to warrant testing for neuromyopathic disorders. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: In patients with abdominal bloating and distention thought to be related to constipation or difficult evacuation, anorectal physiology testing is suggested to rule out a pelvic floor disorder. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: When dietary modifications are needed (eg, low-fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols diet), a gastroenterology dietitian should preferably monitor treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Probiotics should not be used to treat abdominal bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Biofeedback therapy may be effective for bloating and distention when a pelvic floor disorder is identified. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Central neuromodulators (eg, antidepressants) are used to treat bloating and abdominal distention by reducing visceral hypersensitivity, raising sensation threshold, and improving psychological comorbidities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Medications used to treat constipation should be considered for treating bloating if constipation symptoms are present. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Psychological therapies, such as hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other brain-gut behavior therapies may be used to treat patients with bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE 15: Diaphragmatic breathing and central neuromodulators are used to treat abdominophrenic dyssynergia.

Gastric sensorimotor function and its clinical measurement

BACKGROUND

Gastroduodenal symptoms are highly prevalent, with underlying sensorimotor dysfunction contributing in many patients. Common symptoms include early satiation, postprandial fullness, epigastric bloating, pain or burning, nausea and vomiting, which collectively affect over 7% of adults. However, the clinical evaluation of these symptoms remains challenging, with current tests of gastric function remaining limited in their ability or availability to separate specific patient subgroups or guide-targeted care.

PURPOSE

In the current edition of Neurogastroenterology & Motility, Silver et al. present new data showing correlations between patterns of intragastric meal distribution and symptom profiles in a large series of patients undergoing gastric emptying scintigraphy. Studies of this type are important, as they motivate understanding beyond existing disease labels, and orient focus toward deeper mechanistic profiling. This brief review provides an overview of gastric sensorimotor function and profiles several current and emerging methods of clinical evaluation. Perspectives are provided on accommodation testing, gastric emptying, measuring gastric myoelectrical activity including new approaches, and antroduodenal manometry. Although gastric physiology is complex, recent progress has been encouraging, with the heterogenous pathophysiology of gastric symptoms continuing to be unraveled, and new techniques for evaluating gastric function and symptoms emerging.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Ongoing progress will now depend on continuing to accurately profile the underlying mechanisms of gastroduodenal disorders to identify specific disease phenotypes that inform care.

Gastric accommodation: Physiology, diagnostic modalities, clinical relevance, and therapies

BACKGROUND

Gastric accommodation is an essential gastric motor function which occurs following ingestion of a meal. Impaired gastric fundic accommodation (IFA) is associated with dyspeptic symptoms. Gastric accommodation is mediated by the vagal pathway with several important physiologic factors such as duodenal nutrient feedback playing a significant role. IFA has been described as a pathophysiologic factor in several gastrointestinal disorders including functional dyspepsia, diabetic gastropathy, post-Nissen fundoplication, postsurgical gastrectomy, and rumination syndrome. Modalities for gastric accommodation assessment include gastric barostat, intragastric meal distribution via scintigraphy, drinking tests (eg, water load), SPECT, MRI, 2D and 3D ultrasound, and intragastric high-resolution manometry. Several treatment options including sumatriptan, buspirone, tandospirone, ondansetron, and acotiamide may improve symptoms by increasing post-meal gastric volume.

PURPOSE

Our aim is to provide an overview of the physiology, diagnostic modalities, and therapies for IFA. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and other sources to identify relevant studies available until December 2020. Gastric accommodation is an important gastric motor function which if impaired, is associated with several upper gastrointestinal disorders. There are an increasing number of gastric accommodation testing modalities; however, each has facets which warrant consideration. Evidence regarding potentially effective therapies for IFA is growing.

Role of Neuromodulators for the Management of Post-Gastric-Fundoplication Dyspepsia: A Retrospective Series

Post-fundoplication dyspepsia is a common complication of gastric fundoplication surgeries. This can be attributable to the loss of fundal relaxation, decreased gastric accommodation, and/or alterations in gastric motility and sensitivity following fundoplication. The role of neuromodulators in the management of such symptoms is unknown. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of neuromodulators such as tricyclic antidepressants, buspirone, and mirtazapine for the management of post-fundoplication dyspepsia.

Postfundoplication retching: Strategies for management

BACKGROUND

Retching is a common symptom in children following antireflux surgery, particularly in those with neurodisability. There is now a strong body of evidence that implicates retching as a major cause of wrap breakdown. Retching is not a symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease; it is a component of the emetic reflex. In addition to causing wrap breakdown, it is indicative of the presence of nausea. It is a highly aversive experience and warrants treatment in its own right.

METHODS

A framework was constructed for the management of postoperative retching, with strategies targeting different components of the emetic reflex. The impact of differing antireflux procedures upon retching was also considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Once treatable underlying causes have been excluded, the approach includes modifications to feeds and feeding regimens, antiemetics and motility agents. Neuromodulation and other, novel, therapies may prove beneficial in future. Children at risk of postoperative retching may be identified before any antireflux surgery is performed. Fundoplication is inappropriate in these children because it does not treat their symptoms, which are not because of gastroesophageal reflux, and may make them worse. They are also at risk of wrap disruption. Alternative strategies for symptom management should be employed, and fundoplication should be avoided.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-V.

Pyloric distensibility measurement after gastric surgery: Which surgeries are associated with pylorospasm?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

History of gastric surgery is found in 10% of patients with gastroparesis, and vagal lesion is often suspected to be the cause of pylorospasm. Recently, pyloric distensibility measurement using the EndoFLIP^® system showed that pylorospasm was present in 30%-50% of gastroparetic patients. Our objective was to assess whether pylorospasm, diagnosed using EndoFLIP^® system was observed in three different types of gastric surgeries: antireflux surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, and esophagectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pyloric distensibility and pressure were measured using the EndoFLIP^® system in 43 patients from two centers (18 antireflux surgery, 16 sleeve gastrectomy, and nine esophagectomy) with dyspeptic symptoms after gastric surgery, and in 21 healthy volunteers. Altered pyloric distensibility was defined as distensibility below 10 mm² /mm Hg as previously reported.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy volunteers (distensibility: 25.2 ± 2.4 mm² /mm Hg; pressure: 9.7 ± 4.4 mm Hg), pyloric distensibility was decreased in 61.1% of patients in the antireflux surgery group (14.5 ± 3.4 mm² /mm Hg; P < .01) and 75.0% of patients in the esophagectomy group (10.8 ± 2.1 mm² /mm Hg; P < .05), while pyloric pressure was only increased in the antireflux surgery group (18.9 ± 2.2 mm Hg; P < .01). Pyloric distensibility and pressure were similar in healthy volunteers and in sleeve gastrectomy (distensibility: 20.3 ± 3.8 mm² /mm Hg; pressure: 15.8 ± 1.6 mm Hg) groups, with decreased pyloric distensibility affecting 18.7% of sleeve gastrectomy patients.

CONCLUSION

Antireflux surgery and esophagectomy were associated with pylorospasm although pylorospasm was not found in all patients. Sleeve gastrectomy was not associated with altered pyloric distensibility nor altered pyloric pressure.

Sacral nerve stimulation increases gastric accommodation in rats: a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway

Impaired gastric accommodation (GA) has been frequently reported in various gastrointestinal diseases. No standard treatment strategy is available for treating impaired GA. We explored the possible effect of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) on GA and discovered a spinal afferent and vagal efferent mechanism in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (450-500 g) with a chronically implanted gastric cannula and ECG electrodes were studied in a series of sessions to study: 1) the effects of SNS with different parameters on gastric tone, compliance, and accommodation using a barostat device; two sets of parameters were tested as follows: parameter 1) 5 Hz, 500 µs, 10 s on 90 s off; 90% motor threshold and parameter 2) same as parameter 1 but 25 Hz; 2) the involvement of spinal afferent pathway via detecting c-fos immunoreactive (IR) cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) of the brain; 3) the involvement of vagal efferent activity via the spectral analysis of heart rate variability derived from the ECG; and 4) the nitrergic mechanism, N^ω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, was given before SNS at 5 Hz. Compared with sham-SNS: 1) SNS at 5 Hz inhibited gastric tone and increased gastric compliance and GA. No difference was noted between the stimulation frequencies of 5 and 25 Hz. 2) SNS increased the expression of c-fos in the NTS. 3) SNS increased cardiac vagal efferent activity and decreased the sympathovagal ratio. 4) l-NAME blocked the relaxation effect of SNS. In conclusion, SNS with certain parameters relaxes gastric fundus and improves gastric accommodation mediated via a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Currently, there is no adequate medical therapy for impaired gastric accommodation, since medications that relax the fundus often impair antral peristalsis and thus further delay gastric emptying that is commonly seen in patients with functional dyspepsia or gastroparesis. The advantage of the potential sacral nerve stimulation therapy is that it improves gastric accommodation by enhancing vagal activity, and the enhanced vagal activity would lead to enhanced antral peristalsis rather than inhibiting it.

Duodenal nutrient exposure contributes to enhancing gastric accommodation

BACKGROUND

The gastric accommodation reflex consists of a relaxation which creates a reservoir for the ingested food before emptying to the duodenum occurs. The mechanisms that control gastric accommodation are not fully understood. This study aims to use intragastric pressure (IGP) measurement and pyloric balloon obstruction to determine the contribution of duodenal nutrient exposure to gastric accommodation and meal-induced satiation.

METHODS

Two conditions were tested in 11 healthy subjects (28.3 ± 3.2 years; 23.6 ± 0.7 kg/m² ; four females). IGP was measured during an intragastric nutrient drink (ND) infusion at a constant rate (60 mL/min) in the presence of a deflated (control) or inflated (pyloric obstruction) balloon placed into the pylorus. During the study, subjects filled out Likert scales for satiation scores and visual analogue scale for 9 epigastric symptoms (hunger, expected amount to eat, satiation, bloating, fullness, nausea, belching, gastric cramps, and pain) before and during ND infusion until maximal satiation.

KEY RESULTS

During pyloric obstruction, the IGP drop and the area above the IGP curve (AAC) were significantly smaller compared with the control condition (6.7 ± 1.0 mm Hg vs3.6 ± 0.8 mm Hg, P = .03 and 69.7 ± 13.5 mm Hg × min vs 20.1 ± 9.0 mm Hg × min, P = .001, respectively). Pyloric obstruction decreased nutrient tolerance compared with the control condition (787.9 ± 73.1 mL vs 970.9 ± 79.2 mL, respectively, P < .05). Pyloric obstruction increased symptoms of bloating (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6; P = .04), fullness (2.3 ± 0.5 vs 3.6 ± 0.3; P = .03), and nausea (0.4 ± 0.2 vs 1.3 ± 0.4; P = .04) compared to control.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

Duodenal nutrient exposure contributes to enhancing gastric accommodation. Preventing the passage of nutrients from the stomach to the duodenum inhibits gastric accommodation and increases meal-induced satiation, bloating, nausea, and fullness.

Gastric accommodation measurements by single photon emission computed tomography and two-dimensional scintigraphy in diabetic patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To compare estimates of gastric accommodation (GA) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to measurements based on intragastric meal distribution immediately post-meal ingestion (IMD⁰ ).

METHODS

We evaluated 108 diabetics with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms who had undergone gastric emptying of solids (GE) by scintigraphy and GA measurements by SPECT. Immediately after ingestion of a ^99m Tc-labeled egg meal (time 0), we estimated IMD⁰ as radioactive counts or area of the proximal half of the stomach on two-dimensional images. Gastric volume (GV) during fasting and after 300 mL Ensure^® was measured by SPECT to quantify accommodation volume (AV) or postprandial to fasting volume ratio (GVR). From the measured proximal gastric area, we estimated the volume of proximal stomach (4/3 × π × r³ ). We performed regression analyses to assess relationships between IMD⁰ and GA (AV) and GVR.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between area and radioactivity counts in the proximal stomach (r = 0.67, P < 0.001); however, there was considerable interpersonal variation [bias 0.20 (95% CI -0.07, 0.47)]. There were no significant correlations between total GV or AV or VR by SPECT and measurements using IMD⁰ : proximal gastric counts, area, and estimated volume as continuous variables of dichotomized patient groups, based on published cutoff values. There were no significant differences in total gastric area or the IMD⁰ parameters (% area or % radioactive counts) between those with and without UGI symptoms except for fullness and satiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Intragastric meal distribution immediately post-meal ingestion is not significantly correlated with GA measurement by SPECT.

Definition, Pathogenesis, and Management of That Cursed Dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is an umbrella term used to encompass a number of symptoms thought to originate from the upper gastrointestinal tract. These symptoms are relatively nonspecific; not surprisingly, therefore, a myriad of conditions may present with any one or a combination of these symptoms. Therein lays the clinician's first challenge: detecting the minority who may have a potentially life-threatening disorder, such as gastric cancer, from a population whose symptoms are, for the most part, considered functional in origin. The second challenge lies in the definition and management of those individuals with functional dyspepsia (FD); the major focus of this review. The Rome process has addressed the issue of FD definition and a look back at the evolution of Rome criteria for this disorder illustrates the complexities that have so frustrated us. There has been no shortage of hypotheses to explain symptom pathogenesis in FD; initially focused on gastric sensorimotor dysfunction, these have now strayed well into the duodenum and have come to entertain such factors as immune responses and the microbiome. FD has proven to be an equally challenging area for therapeutics; while the staple approaches of acid suppression and eradication of Helicobacter pylori have some limited efficacy in select populations, strategies to ameliorate symptoms in the majority of sufferers based on presumed pathophysiology have largely foundered. Lacking a validated biomarker(s) FD continues to be an elusive target and is likely to remain so until we can better define the various phenotypes that it must surely contain.