A comparison of various intragastric balloons for the assessment of gastric motility

Clinical validation of the VIPUN™ gastric monitoring system versus manometry for the evaluation of gastric motility

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal dysmotility is frequently suspected in patients with gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, and ileus, and in the intensive care unit. Monitoring of gastric motility in clinical practice remains challenging. A novel technology was developed to meet the medical need for a widely available bedside tool to monitor gastric motility continuously. The VIPUN™ Gastric Monitoring System (GMS) comprises a nasogastric feeding tube with intragastric balloon to allow for measuring gastric contractions.

AIMS

To compare the performance of the VIPUN GMS versus a reference technique (manometry).

METHODS

In this validation study in healthy subjects, the investigational catheter and a solid-state manometry catheter were placed in the stomach concomitantly. Motility was recorded for 2.5 h: 2 h in a fasting state, followed by a 400-kcal liquid meal, and monitoring of the fed state for the remaining half hour. The performance of both systems was compared by automated recognition and manual identification of the contractile activity. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation).

KEY RESULTS

The analysis set comprised 13 healthy subjects (6 women, age: 27.5 (8.1) years, BMI: 22.2 (2.46) kg/m2). Automatically-recognized contractility was strongly correlated between the two techniques (endpoint: contraction duration; Spearman ρ = 0.96, p < 0.001). A correlation was also observed between the number of individual contractions identified by expert gastroenterologists on both technologies independently (ρ = 0.71, p = .007) and between the contractions identified by the experts and by the GMS software (ρ = 0.87, p = 0.001). No serious or unanticipated adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The observed strong correlations with the gold standard, manometry, validate the performance of the VIPUN GMS as a gastric monitoring system.

Modelling and manufacturing of 3D-printed, patient-specific, and anthropomorphic gastric phantoms: a pilot study

Interventional devices including intragastric balloons are widely used to treat obesity. This study aims to develop 3D-printed, patient-specific, and anthropomorphic gastric phantoms with mechanical properties similar to those of human stomach. Using computed tomography gastrography (CTG) images of three patients, gastric phantoms were modelled through shape registration to align the stomach shapes of three different phases. Shape accuracies of the original gastric models versus the 3D-printed phantoms were compared using landmark distances. The mechanical properties (elongation and tensile strength), number of silicone coatings (0, 2, and 8 times), and specimen hardness (50, 60, and 70 Shore A) of three materials (Agilus, Elastic, and Flexa) were evaluated. Registration accuracy was significantly lower between the arterial and portal phases (3.16 ± 0.80 mm) than that between the portal and delayed phases (8.92 ± 0.96 mm). The mean shape accuracy difference was less than 10 mm. The mean elongations and tensile strengths of the Agilus, Elastic, and Flexa were 264%, 145%, and 146% and 1.14, 1.59, and 2.15 MPa, respectively, and their mechanical properties differed significantly (all p < 0.05). Elongation and tensile strength assessments, CTG image registration and 3D printing resulted in highly realistic and patient-specific gastric phantoms with reasonable shape accuracies.

Repeated Gastric Motility Measurement Affects Gastric Motility and Epigastric Symptom Sensation

Background: Gastric motility is an important determinant of gastric emptying, epigastric symptom generation, and intolerance to food. Motility is classically assessed directly using manometry or an intragastric balloon. These diagnostic methods are perceived as stressful and invasive, which, by itself might influence the readout of these assessments. Our hypothesis was that with repeated exposure to an invasive motility test the outcome would be different.

Methods: Gastric motility was assessed with a custom-made orogastric balloon catheter in 10 healthy subjects naive to intubation. A motility index ranging from 0 (no motility) to 1 (maximum motility) was calculated in the fasted state for 3.5 h. Symptoms were surveyed with visual analog scales of 100 mm. Results are presented as median (interquartile range).

Results: Motility index during visit 1 [0.40 (0.37–0.59)] was lower compared to visit 2 [0.50 (0.45–0.66); not significant] and 3 [0.63 (0.50–0.71); p = 0.016]. Nausea and pain scores were significantly higher during visit 1 (35 (2.8–126) and 103 (88–125) mm, respectively) compared with visit 3 [1 (2.8–26) mm (p = 0.016) and 75 (30–100) mm (p = 0.008), respectively]. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: Repeated exposure to an invasive method to assess motility resulted in more vigorous motility and lower symptom scores. Caution is warranted when interpreting functional assessments, as prior exposure to invasive tests might confound the obtained results through habituation.

Codeine delays gastric emptying through inhibition of gastric motility as assessed with a novel diagnostic intragastric balloon catheter

BACKGROUND

The use of opioids as analgesic is on the rise, despite their inhibitory effect on gastric emptying. A novel feeding catheter with integrated intragastric balloon was developed to continuously assess gastric motility, enabling to investigate the effect of opioids on motility and emptying simultaneously. We aimed to discriminate normal and pharmacologically impaired gastric motility and its impact on gastric emptying in healthy adults.

METHODS

The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System comprises a nasogastric balloon catheter and a monitoring unit. In a four-way randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study, subjects received either placebo or 58.8 mg codeine phosphate in combination with either an uninflated or an inflated (180 mL) balloon catheter. Motility-induced pressure changes were recorded for 6 hours. During the first 2 hours, nutrients were infused (225 kcal, 75 mL/h). Gastric emptying was assessed with a ¹³ C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). An algorithm, designed to detect phasic contractility, converted pressure changes to a gastric balloon motility index (GBMI). Results are presented as mean(SD).

KEY RESULTS

Eighteen subjects completed the investigation (32(13) years, 22(2) kg/m² ). After codeine, GBMI was lower (0.31(0.16)) and GET½ was longer (233(57) minutes) compared with placebo (GBMI: 0.48(0.15), P < .01 and GET½: 172(12) minutes, P < .001). Within-subject ΔGET½ correlated significantly with ΔGBMI (r = -0.77 and P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System allowed to assess gastric motility safely and continuously. The correlation between pharmacologically decreased gastric emptying and motility indicates a strong link between both. Gastric motility, measured with this innovative device, can be an indicator for gastrointestinal intolerance.