1
|
Marynissen H, de Hoon J. Glucocorticoids Do Not Affect the Vascular Component of TRP-Mediated Neurogenic Skin Inflammation. J Inflamm Res 2024; 17:2835-2838. [PMID: 38737114 PMCID: PMC11088837 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s456159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Marynissen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Regan CP, Morissette P, Kraus RL, Wang E, Arrington L, Vavrek M, de Hoon J, Depre M, Lodeweyck T, Demeyer I, Laethem T, Stoch A, Struyk A. Autonomic Dysfunction Linked to Inhibition of the Na v1.7 Sodium Channel. Circulation 2024; 149:1394-1396. [PMID: 38648272 PMCID: PMC11027978 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.067331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pierre Morissette
- Nonclinical Drug Safety (C.P.R., P.M., E.W.), Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA
| | | | - Erjia Wang
- Nonclinical Drug Safety (C.P.R., P.M., E.W.), Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA
| | - Leticia Arrington
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism (L.A., M.V.), Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA
| | - Marissa Vavrek
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism (L.A., M.V.), Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Leuven; Belgium (J.d.H., M.D., T. Lodeweyck)
| | - Marleen Depre
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Leuven; Belgium (J.d.H., M.D., T. Lodeweyck)
| | - Thomas Lodeweyck
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Leuven; Belgium (J.d.H., M.D., T. Lodeweyck)
| | - Ignace Demeyer
- Burn Center, Military Hospital Queen Astrid, Brussels, Belgium (I.D.)
| | - Tine Laethem
- Translational Medicine, Merck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA (T. Laethem, A. Stoch, A. Struyk)
| | - Aubrey Stoch
- Translational Medicine, Merck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA (T. Laethem, A. Stoch, A. Struyk)
| | - Arie Struyk
- Translational Medicine, Merck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA (T. Laethem, A. Stoch, A. Struyk)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marynissen H, Janssen C, Bamps D, de Hoon J. Vascular read-out for TRP channel functionality on distal peripheral nerve endings in healthy men. Microvasc Res 2024; 152:104654. [PMID: 38215901 DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantification of the vasodilation after topical application of capsaicin or cinnamaldehyde is often implemented to indirectly assess Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) or Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) functionality respectively. This method has been well-established on the human forearm. However, to enable TRP functionality assessments in distal peripheral neuropathy, the vascular response upon TRP activation on dorsal finger skin was characterized. METHODS Two doses of cinnamaldehyde (3 % and 10 % v/v) and capsaicin (300 μg and 1000 μg) were topically applied (20 μL) on the skin of the mid three proximal phalanges in 17 healthy men. The dose-response, and inter-hand and inter-period reproducibility of the dermal blood flow (DBF) increase was assessed using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) during 60 min post-application. Linear mixed models explored dose-driven differences, whereas the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) estimated the reproducibility of the vascular response. RESULTS Both doses of cinnamaldehyde and capsaicin induced a robust, dose-dependent increase in DBF. The vascular response to cinnamaldehyde 10 % on finger skin, expressed as area under the curve, correlated well over time (ICC = 0.66) and excellently between hands (ICC = 0.87). Similarly, the response to capsaicin 1000 μg correlated moderately over time (ICC = 0.50) and well between hands (ICC = 0.73). CONCLUSION The vascular response upon topical cinnamaldehyde and capsaicin application on finger skin is an alternative approach for measurements on forearm skin. Thereby, it is a promising vascular read-out to investigate the pathophysiology, and TRP involvement in particular, of specific peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Marynissen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Charlien Janssen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dorien Bamps
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bamps D, Blockeel AJ, Dreesen E, Marynissen H, Laenen J, Van Hecken A, Wilke A, Shahabi S, Johnson KW, Collins EC, Broad LM, Phillips KG, de Hoon J. TRPA1 Antagonist LY3526318 Inhibits the Cinnamaldehyde-Evoked Dermal Blood Flow Increase: Translational Proof of Pharmacology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 114:1093-1103. [PMID: 37562824 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Transient receptor potential Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is an ion channel expressed by sensory neurons, where it mediates pain signaling. Consequently, it has emerged as a promising target for novel analgesics, yet, to date, no TRPA1 antagonists have been approved for clinical use. In the present translational study, we utilized dermal blood flow changes evoked by TRPA1 agonist cinnamaldehyde as a target engagement biomarker to investigate the in vivo pharmacology of LY3526318, a novel TRPA1 antagonist. In rats, LY3526318 (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) dose-dependently reduced the cutaneous vasodilation typically observed following topical application of 10% v/v cinnamaldehyde. The inhibition was significant at the site of cinnamaldehyde application and also when including an adjacent area of skin. Similarly, in a cohort of 16 healthy human volunteers, LY3526318 administration (10, 30, and 100 mg, p.o.) dose-dependently reduced the elevated blood flow surrounding the site of 10% v/v cinnamaldehyde application, with a trend toward inhibition at the site of application. Comparisons between both species reveal that the effects of LY3526318 on the cinnamaldehyde-induced dermal blood flow are greater in rats relative to humans, even when adjusting for cross-species differences in potency of the compound at TRPA1. Exposure-response relationships suggest that a greater magnitude response may be observed in humans if higher antagonist concentrations could be achieved. Taken together, these results demonstrate that cinnamaldehyde-evoked changes in dermal blood flow can be utilized as a target engagement biomarker for TRPA1 activity and that LY3526318 antagonizes the ion channel both in rats and humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien Bamps
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Erwin Dreesen
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heleen Marynissen
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Laenen
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - August Wilke
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Kirk W Johnson
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Lisa M Broad
- Eli Lilly and Company, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, UK
| | - Keith G Phillips
- Eli Lilly and Company, Neuroscience Next Generation Therapeutics, Lilly Innovation Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marynissen H, Mergaerts D, Bamps D, de Hoon J. Does etodolac affect TRPA1 functionality in vivo in human? J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2023; 34:531-537. [PMID: 36972286 DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In preclinical research, etodolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, affected transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) activation. Yet, whether the in vitro interaction between etodolac and TRPA1 translates to altered TRPA1 functionality in vivo in human remains to be investigated. METHODS A randomized, double-blinded, celecoxib-controlled study was conducted to assess the effect of etodolac on TRPA1-mediated dermal blood flow (DBF) changes on the forearm of 15 healthy, male volunteers aged between 18 and 45 years. Over four study visits, separated by at least five days wash-out, a single or four-fold dose of etodolac 200 mg or celecoxib 200 mg was administered orally. Two hours post-dose, TRPA1 functionality was evaluated by assessing cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes. DBF changes were quantified and expressed in Perfusion Units (PUs) using laser Doppler imaging during 60 min post-cinnamaldehyde application. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC0-60min) was calculated as summary measure. Statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed models with post-hoc Dunnett. RESULTS Neither the single dose of etodolac nor celecoxib inhibited the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes compared to no treatment (AUC0-60min ± SEM of 17,751 ± 1,514 PUs*min and 17,532 ± 1,706 PUs*min vs. 19,274 ± 1,031 PUs*min, respectively, both p=1.00). Similarly, also a four-fold dose of both compounds failed to inhibit the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes (19,235 ± 1,260 PUs*min and 19,367 ± 1,085 PUs*min vs. 19,274 ± 1,031 PUs*min, respectively, both p=1.00). CONCLUSIONS Etodolac did not affect the cinnamaldehyde-induced DBF changes, suggesting that it does not alter TRPA1 functionality in vivo in human.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Marynissen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Delphine Mergaerts
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dorien Bamps
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Botermans W, Koole M, Van Laere K, Savidge JR, Kemp JA, Sunaert S, Duffy MM, Ramael S, Cesura AM, D’Ostilio K, Gossen D, Madsen TM, Lodeweyckx T, de Hoon J. SDI-118, a novel procognitive SV2A modulator: First-in-human randomized controlled trial including PET/fMRI assessment of target engagement. Front Pharmacol 2023; 13:1066447. [PMID: 36733374 PMCID: PMC9887116 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1066447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Current treatments for progressive neurodegenerative disorders characterized by cognitive impairment either have limited efficacy or are lacking altogether. SDI-118 is a small molecule which modulates the activity of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) in the brain and shows cognitive enhancing effects in a range of animal models of cognitive deficit. Methods: This first-in-human study evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of SDI-118 in single ascending oral doses up to 80 mg administered to 32 healthy male subjects. Brain target occupancy was measured in eight subjects using positron emission tomography with PET-ligand [11C]-UCB-J. Food effect was assessed in seven subjects. Mood state was regularly evaluated using standardized questionnaires, and resting state fMRI data were analyzed as exploratory objectives. Key Results: At all doses tested, SDI-118 was well tolerated and appeared safe. Adverse events were mainly dizziness, hypersomnia, and somnolence. All were mild in intensity and increased in frequency with increasing administered dose. No dose-limiting adverse reactions were observed at any dose. SDI-118 displayed a linear pharmacokinetic profile with no significant food effect. Brain penetration and target engagement were demonstrated by a dose-proportional SV2A occupancy. Conclusion: Single oral doses of SDI-118 up to 80 mg were very well tolerated in healthy male subjects. Dose-proportional SV2A occupancy in the brain was demonstrated with brain imaging. Adverse effects in humans mainly occurred in higher dose ranges, with high occupancy levels, and were all mild and self-limiting. These data support further clinical exploration of the compound in patients with cognitive disorders. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05486195.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Botermans
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,*Correspondence: Wouter Botermans,
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonathan R. Savidge
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John A. Kemp
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefan Sunaert
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maeve M. Duffy
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Ramael
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrea M. Cesura
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Torsten M. Madsen
- Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Lodeweyckx
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bamps D, Berdon K, Hernández H, Schrijvers R, de Hoon J, Luven KU. Histamine skin prick tests: from established diagnostic technique to advanced experimental biomarker. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2023; 36:87-97. [PMID: 36623479 DOI: 10.1159/000528772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Skin prick tests have a long history as diagnostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker. Besides visual assessments of the wheal and flare, objective blood flow measurements using laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) have been reported. In light of these advancements, an up-to-date characterization of the histamine-evoked response is worthwhile. Methods A single-center study was completed in healthy males. Two parameters were addressed: (1) dermal blood flow (DBF) within a 7.65 mm ring encircling the skin prick site (DBFring), and (2) surface area of the flare (AREAflare). First, the dose response was assessed using placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) or histamine (histamine dihydrochloride 1, 3 or 10 mg/mL) skin pricks on the volar surface of subjects' (n=12) forearm. The DBFring was measured by LDI, the AREAflare by LDI and by ruler. Secondly, the inter-arm and inter-period reproducibility of the DBFring and AREAflare, as evoked by histamine (10 mg/mL) and measured by LDI and LSCI, was examined (n=14). Lastly, the effect of aprepitant (125 mg), ketotifen (1 mg) and a single (5 mg) and fourfold (20 mg) dose of desloratadine and levocetirizine on the histamine-induced (10 mg/mL) DBFring and AREAflare was evaluated with LSCI (n=13 or 12). Results All three histamine doses induced a time-dependent vasodilation. Ruler recordings did not conclusively correlate with LDI assessments of the AREAflare. The DBFring and AREAflare were reasonably reproducible when measured by using LDI or LSCI, with negligible bias between arms and study periods and poor to moderate within-subject reproducibility (0.23≤ ICC≤ 0.71). While the fourfold dose of desloratadine (p=0.0041) and the single and fourfold dose of levocetirizine (p<0.0001) managed to reduce the AREAflare, only the fourfold dose of levocetirizine (p=0.0052) reduced the DBFring. Discussion/conclusion Caution is warranted when translating years of clinical experience with histamine skin prick tests to objective recordings of the associated changes in skin perfusion. Ruler and LDI assessments of the AREAflare do not consistently correlate, and the reproducibility and histamine-dependency of the measurements is not obvious. While 10 mg/mL histamine may be a good choice for qualitative diagnostic evaluations, a lower dose may be better suited to use as a quantitative biomarker.
Collapse
|
8
|
Simoens C, Philippaert K, Wuyts C, Goscinny S, Van Hoeck E, Van Loco J, Billen J, de Hoon J, Ampe E, Vangoitsenhoven R, Mertens A, Vennekens R, Van der Schueren B. Pharmacokinetics of Oral Rebaudioside A in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Its Effects on Glucose Homeostasis: A Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2022; 47:827-839. [PMID: 36057030 PMCID: PMC9440320 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-022-00792-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Rebaudioside A, a steviol glycoside, is deglycosylated by intestinal microflora prior to the absorption of steviol and conjugation to steviol glucuronide. While glucose-lowering properties are observed for rebaudioside A in mice, they have been attributed to the metabolites steviol and steviol glucuronide. We aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of rebaudioside A and its metabolites in patients with early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods This randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, two-way crossover trial was performed in subjects with T2DM on metformin or no therapy at the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Following oral rebaudioside A (3 g), plasma concentrations of rebaudioside A, steviol and steviol glucuronide were determined. The effect on glucose homeostasis was examined by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed 19 h following rebaudioside A administration, i.e. the presumed time of maximal steviol and steviol glucuronide concentrations. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the difference in area under the blood glucose concentration–time curve during the first 2 h of the OGTT (AUCGlucose(0–2h)) for rebaudioside A vs. placebo. Results In total, 30 subjects [63.5 (57.8–69.0) years of age, 86.7% male] completed the trial. Rebaudioside A was detected as early as 1 h after administration in nearly all subjects. As expected, steviol and steviol glucuronide reached their maximal concentrations at 19.5 h following rebaudioside A administration. Rebaudioside A did not lower the AUCGlucose(0–2h) compared to placebo (− 0.7 (95% CI − 22.3; 20.9) h·mg/dL, P = 0.95). Insulin and C-peptide concentrations were also comparable between both conditions (P > 0.05). Conclusion Rebaudioside A is readily absorbed after oral administration and metabolized to steviol and steviol glucuronide. However, no effect on glucose nor insulin or C-peptide excursion was observed during the OGTT at the time of maximal metabolite concentrations. Thus, no antidiabetic properties of rebaudioside A could be observed in patients with T2DM after single oral use. Clinical Trial Registration Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03510624). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13318-022-00792-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Simoens
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koenraad Philippaert
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Wuyts
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Els Van Hoeck
- Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Sciensano, Elsene, Belgium
| | - Joris Van Loco
- Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Sciensano, Elsene, Belgium
| | - Jaak Billen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Ampe
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roman Vangoitsenhoven
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Mertens
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rudi Vennekens
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Van der Schueren
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marynissen H, Buntinx L, Bamps D, Depre M, Ampe E, Van Hecken A, Gabriel K, Sands S, Vargas G, de Hoon J. First-in-human development of a pharmacodynamic biomarker for PAC 1 receptor antagonists using intradermal injections of maxadilan. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15:1968-1977. [PMID: 35621246 PMCID: PMC9372410 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Maxadilan, a potent vasodilator peptide, selectively activates the PAC1 receptor, a promising target for migraine therapy. Therefore, maxadilan has been suggested as a tool to study the pharmacodynamics (PDs) of PAC1 receptor antagonists. The objectives of this first-in-human study were to: (1) determine the safety, tolerability, dose response, and time course of the dermal blood flow (DBF) changes after intradermal (i.d.) injections of maxadilan in the human forearm, and (2) assess the inter-arm and inter-period reproducibility of this response. This was a single-center, open-label study in healthy subjects, comprising three parts: (1) dose-response (n = 25), (2) response duration (n = 10), and (3) reproducibility (n = 15). DBF measurements were performed using laser Doppler imaging (LDI) up to 60 min postinjection, or up to 5 days for the response duration assessments. To assess reproducibility, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and sample sizes were calculated. The i.d. maxadilan (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.9, 3, and 10 ng) produced a well-tolerated, dose-dependent increase in DBF, with a half-maximal effective concentration fitted at 0.0098 ng. The DBF response to 0.9 ng maxadilan was quantifiable with LDI up to 72 h postinjection. The inter-period reproducibility of the DBF response was better upon 0.9 ng (ICC > 0.6) compared to 0.01 ng (ICC < 0.4) maxadilan. However, irrespective of the study design or maxadilan dose, a sample size of 11 subjects is sufficient to detect a 30% difference in DBF response with 80% power. In conclusion, intradermal maxadilan provides a safe, well-tolerated, and reproducible PD biomarker for PAC1 receptor antagonists in vivo in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Marynissen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Dorien Bamps
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marleen Depre
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Ampe
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristin Gabriel
- Spark Therapeutics, Member of the Roche Group, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li W, Wang Y, Lohith TG, Zeng Z, Tong L, Mazzola R, Riffel K, Miller P, Purcell M, Holahan M, Haley H, Gantert L, Hesk D, Ren S, Morrow J, Uslaner J, Struyk A, Wai JMC, Rudd MT, Tellers DM, McAvoy T, Bormans G, Koole M, Van Laere K, Serdons K, de Hoon J, Declercq R, De Lepeleire I, Pascual MB, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Yu M, Arbones V, Masdeu JC, Cheng A, Hussain A, Bueters T, Anderson MS, Hostetler ED, Basile AS. The PET tracer [ 11C]MK-6884 quantifies M4 muscarinic receptor in rhesus monkeys and patients with Alzheimer's disease. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabg3684. [PMID: 35020407 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg3684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenping Li
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Yuchuan Wang
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | - Zhizhen Zeng
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Ling Tong
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | - Kerry Riffel
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | - Mona Purcell
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | - Hyking Haley
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Liza Gantert
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - David Hesk
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - Sumei Ren
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | - John Morrow
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | - Arie Struyk
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Guy Bormans
- Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kim Serdons
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Declercq
- Translational Pharmacology Europe, MSD (Europe) Inc., 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Inge De Lepeleire
- Translational Pharmacology Europe, MSD (Europe) Inc., 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maria B Pascual
- Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara
- Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Meixiang Yu
- Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Victoria Arbones
- Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joseph C Masdeu
- Nantz National Alzheimer Center, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Amy Cheng
- MRL, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marynissen H, Lodeweyckx T, Bielen D, de Hoon J. Doppler ultrasound to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of splanchnic vasoactive compounds. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:1785-1794. [PMID: 34558102 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS In search of noninvasive biomarkers to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of portal pressure-lowering drugs, the reproducibility of flow measurements in the superior mesenteric artery was evaluated using Doppler ultrasound. METHODS A reproducibility study was conducted in 15 healthy male volunteers (18-50 y). Eight ultrasound measurements were performed for each subject: 2 observers each conducted 2 measurements during 2 separate visits. The following flow parameters were captured: peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI), volume flow (VF) and vessel diameter. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS Results are presented as intraclass correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval]. The flow parameters PSV, EDV, PI and VF correlated excellently within observer during visit 1 (0.888 [0.748-0.953], 0.910 [0.793-0.962], 0.844 [0.656-0.933] and 0.916 [0.857-0.951], respectively) and visit 2 (0.925 [0.829-0.968], 0.942 [0.863-0.976], 0.883 [0.719-0.954] and 0.915 [0.855-0.951], respectively). Measurements conducted during 2 separate visits by 1 observer correlated well to excellently for PSV, EDV, PI and VF (0.756 [0.552-0.875], 0.836 [0.694-0.916], 0.807 [0.631-0.904] and 0.839 [0.783-0.882], respectively). Measurements conducted by 2 distinct observers correlated well to excellently for PSV, EDV and VF during visit 1 (0.813 [0.584-0.922], 0.884 [0.597-0.945] and 0.786 [0.575-0.899], respectively) and visit 2 (0.779 [0.498-0.912], 0.861 [0.672-0.945], 0.810 [0.553-0.926], respectively). Vessel diameter measurements were poorly reproducible. CONCLUSION Doppler ultrasound is a reproducible method for flow measurements in the superior mesenteric artery in a standardized group of healthy volunteers. Therefore, it is a promising technique to assess pharmacodynamic effects of splanchnic vasoactive compounds in early clinical drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Marynissen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Lodeweyckx
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Didier Bielen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mertens N, Schmidt ME, Hijzen A, Van Weehaeghe D, Ravenstijn P, Depre M, de Hoon J, Van Laere K, Koole M. Minimally invasive quantification of cerebral P2X7R occupancy using dynamic [ 18F]JNJ-64413739 PET and MRA-driven image derived input function. Sci Rep 2021; 11:16172. [PMID: 34373571 PMCID: PMC8352986 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95715-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
[18F]JNJ-64413739 has been evaluated as PET-ligand for in vivo quantification of purinergic receptor subtype 7 receptor (P2X7R) using Logan graphical analysis with a metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function. In the context of a P2X7R PET dose occupancy study, we evaluated a minimally invasive approach by limiting arterial sampling to baseline conditions. Meanwhile, post dose distribution volumes (VT) under blocking conditions were estimated by combining baseline blood to plasma ratios and metabolite fractions with an MR angiography driven image derived input function (IDIF). Regional postdose VT,IDIF values were compared with corresponding VT,AIF estimates using a arterial input function (AIF), in terms of absolute values, test–retest reliability and receptor occupancy. Compared to an invasive AIF approach, postdose VT,IDIF values and corresponding receptor occupancies showed only limited bias (Bland–Altman analysis: 0.06 ± 0.27 and 3.1% ± 6.4%) while demonstrating a high correlation (Spearman ρ = 0.78 and ρ = 0.98 respectively). In terms of test–retest reliability, regional intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.98 ± 0.02 for VT,IDIF compared to 0.97 ± 0.01 for VT,AIF. These results confirmed that a postdose IDIF, guided by MR angiography and using baseline blood and metabolite data, can be considered for accurate [18F]JNJ-64413739 PET quantification in a repeated PET study design, thus avoiding multiple invasive arterial sampling and increasing dosing flexibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Mertens
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Anja Hijzen
- Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Donatienne Van Weehaeghe
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Marleen Depre
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gevaert P, De Craemer J, De Ruyck N, Rottey S, de Hoon J, Hellings PW, Volckaert B, Lesneuck K, Orengo JM, Atanasio A, Kamal MA, Abdallah H, Kamat V, Dingman R, DeVeaux M, Ramesh D, Perlee L, Wang CQ, Weinreich DM, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD, O'Brien MP. Novel antibody cocktail targeting Bet v 1 rapidly and sustainably treats birch allergy symptoms in a phase 1 study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 149:189-199. [PMID: 34126156 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of an allergen-specific IgG cocktail to treat cat allergy suggests that allergen-specific IgG may be a major protective mechanism elicited by allergen immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES Extending these findings, we tested a Bet v 1-specific antibody cocktail in birch-allergic subjects. METHODS This was a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, study with 2 parts. Part A administered ascending doses of the Bet v 1-specific antibody cocktail REGN5713/14/15 (150-900 mg) in 32 healthy adults. Part B administered a single subcutaneous 900-mg dose or placebo in 64 birch-allergic subjects. Total nasal symptom score response to titrated birch extract nasal allergen challenge and skin prick test (SPT) with birch and alder allergen were assessed at screening and days 8, 29, 57, and 113 (SPT only); basophil activation tests (n = 26) were conducted. RESULTS Single-dose REGN5713/14/15 significantly reduced total nasal symptom score following birch nasal allergen challenge relative to baseline. Differences in total nasal symptom score areas under the curve (0-1 hour) for subjects treated with REGN5713/14/15 versus those given placebo (day 8: -1.17, P = .001; day 29: -1.18, P = .001; day 57: -0.85, P = .024) and titration SPT with birch difference in area under the curve of mean wheal diameters for subjects treated with REGN5713/14/15 versus placebo (all P < .001) were sustained for ≥2 months; similar results were observed with alder SPT. REGN5713/14/15 was well tolerated. Basophil responsiveness to birch-related allergens was significantly decreased in subjects treated with REGN5713/14/15 versus those given placebo on days 8, 57, and 113 (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Single-dose REGN5713/14/15 was well tolerated and provided a rapid (1 week) and durable (2 months) reduction in allergic symptoms after birch allergen nasal allergen challenge, potentially offering a new paradigm for the treatment of birch allergy symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Gevaert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jarno De Craemer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Natalie De Ruyck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Rottey
- Drug Research Unit Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter W Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Volckaert
- SGS Belgium Clinical Pharmacology Unit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kristof Lesneuck
- SGS Belgium Clinical Pharmacology Unit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gary Herman
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sadoff J, Le Gars M, Shukarev G, Heerwegh D, Truyers C, de Groot AM, Stoop J, Tete S, Van Damme W, Leroux-Roels I, Berghmans PJ, Kimmel M, Van Damme P, de Hoon J, Smith W, Stephenson KE, De Rosa SC, Cohen KW, McElrath MJ, Cormier E, Scheper G, Barouch DH, Hendriks J, Struyf F, Douoguih M, Van Hoof J, Schuitemaker H. Interim Results of a Phase 1-2a Trial of Ad26.COV2.S Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:1824-1835. [PMID: 33440088 PMCID: PMC7821985 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2034201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 798] [Impact Index Per Article: 266.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacious vaccines are urgently needed to contain the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A candidate vaccine, Ad26.COV2.S, is a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vector encoding a full-length and stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. METHODS In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2a trial, we randomly assigned healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 55 years (cohort 1) and those 65 years of age or older (cohort 3) to receive the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine at a dose of 5×1010 viral particles (low dose) or 1×1011 viral particles (high dose) per milliliter or placebo in a single-dose or two-dose schedule. Longer-term data comparing a single-dose regimen with a two-dose regimen are being collected in cohort 2; those results are not reported here. The primary end points were the safety and reactogenicity of each dose schedule. RESULTS After the administration of the first vaccine dose in 805 participants in cohorts 1 and 3 and after the second dose in cohort 1, the most frequent solicited adverse events were fatigue, headache, myalgia, and injection-site pain. The most frequent systemic adverse event was fever. Systemic adverse events were less common in cohort 3 than in cohort 1 and in those who received the low vaccine dose than in those who received the high dose. Reactogenicity was lower after the second dose. Neutralizing-antibody titers against wild-type virus were detected in 90% or more of all participants on day 29 after the first vaccine dose (geometric mean titer [GMT], 212 to 354), regardless of vaccine dose or age group, and reached 96% by day 57 with a further increase in titers (GMT, 288 to 488) in cohort 1a. Titers remained stable until at least day 71. A second dose provided an increase in the titer by a factor of 2.6 to 2.9 (GMT, 827 to 1266). Spike-binding antibody responses were similar to neutralizing-antibody responses. On day 15, CD4+ T-cell responses were detected in 76 to 83% of the participants in cohort 1 and in 60 to 67% of those in cohort 3, with a clear skewing toward type 1 helper T cells. CD8+ T-cell responses were robust overall but lower in cohort 3. CONCLUSIONS The safety and immunogenicity profiles of Ad26.COV2.S support further development of this vaccine candidate. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services; COV1001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04436276.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerald Sadoff
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Mathieu Le Gars
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Georgi Shukarev
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Dirk Heerwegh
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Carla Truyers
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Anne M de Groot
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Jeroen Stoop
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Sarah Tete
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Wim Van Damme
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Isabel Leroux-Roels
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Pieter-Jan Berghmans
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Murray Kimmel
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Jan de Hoon
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - William Smith
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Kathryn E Stephenson
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Stephen C De Rosa
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Kristen W Cohen
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - M Juliana McElrath
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Emmanuel Cormier
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Gert Scheper
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Dan H Barouch
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Jenny Hendriks
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Frank Struyf
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Macaya Douoguih
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Johan Van Hoof
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Hanneke Schuitemaker
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sadoff J, Le Gars M, Shukarev G, Heerwegh D, Truyers C, de Groot AM, Stoop J, Tete S, Van Damme W, Leroux-Roels I, Berghmans PJ, Kimmel M, Van Damme P, de Hoon J, Smith W, Stephenson KE, De Rosa SC, Cohen KW, McElrath MJ, Cormier E, Scheper G, Barouch DH, Hendriks J, Struyf F, Douoguih M, Van Hoof J, Schuitemaker H. Interim Results of a Phase 1-2a Trial of Ad26.COV2.S Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2021. [PMID: 33440088 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2034201/suppl_file/nejmoa2034201_data-sharing.pdf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacious vaccines are urgently needed to contain the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A candidate vaccine, Ad26.COV2.S, is a recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vector encoding a full-length and stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. METHODS In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2a trial, we randomly assigned healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 55 years (cohort 1) and those 65 years of age or older (cohort 3) to receive the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine at a dose of 5×1010 viral particles (low dose) or 1×1011 viral particles (high dose) per milliliter or placebo in a single-dose or two-dose schedule. Longer-term data comparing a single-dose regimen with a two-dose regimen are being collected in cohort 2; those results are not reported here. The primary end points were the safety and reactogenicity of each dose schedule. RESULTS After the administration of the first vaccine dose in 805 participants in cohorts 1 and 3 and after the second dose in cohort 1, the most frequent solicited adverse events were fatigue, headache, myalgia, and injection-site pain. The most frequent systemic adverse event was fever. Systemic adverse events were less common in cohort 3 than in cohort 1 and in those who received the low vaccine dose than in those who received the high dose. Reactogenicity was lower after the second dose. Neutralizing-antibody titers against wild-type virus were detected in 90% or more of all participants on day 29 after the first vaccine dose (geometric mean titer [GMT], 212 to 354), regardless of vaccine dose or age group, and reached 96% by day 57 with a further increase in titers (GMT, 288 to 488) in cohort 1a. Titers remained stable until at least day 71. A second dose provided an increase in the titer by a factor of 2.6 to 2.9 (GMT, 827 to 1266). Spike-binding antibody responses were similar to neutralizing-antibody responses. On day 15, CD4+ T-cell responses were detected in 76 to 83% of the participants in cohort 1 and in 60 to 67% of those in cohort 3, with a clear skewing toward type 1 helper T cells. CD8+ T-cell responses were robust overall but lower in cohort 3. CONCLUSIONS The safety and immunogenicity profiles of Ad26.COV2.S support further development of this vaccine candidate. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services; COV1001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04436276.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerald Sadoff
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Mathieu Le Gars
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Georgi Shukarev
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Dirk Heerwegh
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Carla Truyers
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Anne M de Groot
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Jeroen Stoop
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Sarah Tete
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Wim Van Damme
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Isabel Leroux-Roels
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Pieter-Jan Berghmans
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Murray Kimmel
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Jan de Hoon
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - William Smith
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Kathryn E Stephenson
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Stephen C De Rosa
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Kristen W Cohen
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - M Juliana McElrath
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Emmanuel Cormier
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Gert Scheper
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Dan H Barouch
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Jenny Hendriks
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Frank Struyf
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Macaya Douoguih
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Johan Van Hoof
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| | - Hanneke Schuitemaker
- From Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Leiden, the Netherlands (J. Sadoff, M.L.G., G. Shukarev, A.M.G., J. Stoop, S.T., E.C., G. Scheper, J. Hendriks, M.D., J.V.H., H.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse (D.H., C.T., F.S.), Janssen Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Merksem (W.V.D.), the Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University, Gent (I.L.-R.), SGS Life Sciences (P.-J.B.) and the Center for the Evaluation of Vaccination, University of Antwerp (P.V.D.), Antwerp, and the Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (J. de Hoon) - all in Belgium; Optimal Research, Melbourne, FL (M.K.); the Alliance for Multispecialty Research, Knoxville, TN (W.S.); the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (K.E.S., D.H.B.); and the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.C.D.R., K.W.C., M.J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cawthorne C, Maguire P, Mercier J, Sciberras D, Serdons K, Bormans G, de Hoon J, Van Laere K, Koole M. Human biodistribution and dosimetry of [ 11C]-UCB-J, a PET radiotracer for imaging synaptic density. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:37. [PMID: 33891195 PMCID: PMC8065069 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00384-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE [11C]-UCB-J is an emerging tool for the noninvasive measurement of synaptic vesicle density in vivo. Here, we report human biodistribution and dosimetry estimates derived from sequential whole-body PET using two versions of the OLINDA dosimetry program. METHODS Sequential whole-body PET scans were performed in 3 healthy subjects for 2 h after injection of 254 ± 77 MBq [11C]-UCB-J. Volumes of interest were drawn over relevant source organs to generate time-activity curves and calculate time-integrated activity coefficients, with effective dose coefficients calculated using OLINDA 2.1 and compared to values derived from OLINDA 1.1 and those recently reported in the literature. RESULTS [11C]-UCB-J administration was safe and showed mixed renal and hepatobiliary clearance, with largest organ absorbed dose coefficients for the urinary bladder wall and small intestine (21.7 and 23.5 μGy/MBq, respectively). The average (±SD) effective dose coefficient was 5.4 ± 0.7 and 5.1 ± 0.8 μSv/MBq for OLINDA versions 1.1 and 2.1 respectively. Doses were lower than previously reported in the literature using either software version. CONCLUSIONS A single IV administration of 370 MBq [11C]-UCB-J corresponds to an effective dose of less than 2.0 mSv, enabling multiple PET examinations to be carried out in the same subject. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number: 2016-001190-32. Registered 16 March 2016, no URL available for phase 1 trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Cawthorne
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Kim Serdons
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Bormans
- Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fiedler-Kelly J, Raddad E, de Hoon J, Ludwig EA, Passarell J, Kielbasa W, Collins EC. Relationship of the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Galcanezumab Pharmacokinetics and Capsaicin-Induced Dermal Blood Flow in Healthy Subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2021; 10:440-452. [PMID: 33740315 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide, was recently approved for migraine prophylaxis. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship between galcanezumab concentration and inhibition of capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow (CIDBF) was evaluated using first-in-human data following 6 single subcutaneous doses (1 to 600 mg) or multiple (4) 150-mg doses every 2 weeks in 7 cohorts (7 actively treated subjects and 2 placebo-treated healthy subjects). Galcanezumab pharmacokinetics were best described by a 1-compartment model with delayed first-order absorption/linear elimination. Apparent estimates (between-subject variability) of clearance, volume of distribution, absorption rate constant, and lag time were 0.0106 L/h (27%CV), 11.2 L (21%CV), 0.0192 h-1 (89%CV), and 0.202 hours, respectively. Estimated elimination half-life was about 30 days. An effect compartment link model described the concentration-effect relationship; estimated maximum inhibitory effect was 70.5%, and 50% maximum inhibitory effect concentration (IC50 ) was 1060 ng/mL. Galcanezumab showed dose- and concentration-dependent potent and durable inhibition of CIDBF. Simulated effect compartment concentrations were maintained above IC50 after 12 weeks of dosing. Near-maximal CIDBF inhibition occurred with 150 mg biweekly for 12 weeks lasting ≥24 weeks or with ≥30 mg every 2 weeks or 195 mg every 13 weeks. Quantitative modeling of galcanezumab PK/PD supported dose selection for the phase 2 proof-of-concept study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Fiedler-Kelly
- Cognigen Corporation, a Simulations Plus company, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Eyas Raddad
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elizabeth A Ludwig
- Cognigen Corporation, a Simulations Plus company, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Julie Passarell
- Cognigen Corporation, a Simulations Plus company, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Chronic pain treatment remains a sore challenge, and in our aging society, the number of patients reporting inadequate pain relief continues to grow. Current treatment options all have their drawbacks, including limited efficacy and the propensity of abuse and addiction; the latter is exemplified by the ongoing opioid crisis. Extensive research in the last few decades has focused on mechanisms underlying chronic pain states, thereby producing attractive opportunities for novel, effective and safe pharmaceutical interventions. Members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channel family represent innovative targets to tackle pain sensation at the root. Three TRP channels, TRPV1, TRPM3, and TRPA1, are of particular interest, as they were identified as sensors of chemical- and heat-induced pain in nociceptor neurons. This review summarizes the knowledge regarding TRP channel-based pain therapies, including the bumpy road of the clinical development of TRPV1 antagonists, the current status of TRPA1 antagonists, and the future potential of targeting TRPM3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien Bamps
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Vriens
- Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Voets
- Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; .,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van Gerven L, Steelant B, Cools L, Callebaut I, Backaert W, de Hoon J, Ampe E, Talavera K, Hellings PW. Low-dose capsaicin (0.01 mM) nasal spray is equally effective as the current standard treatment for idiopathic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 147:397-400.e4. [PMID: 32439432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Van Gerven
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Brecht Steelant
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leen Cools
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ina Callebaut
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Backaert
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Ampe
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karel Talavera
- Laboratory for Ion Channel Research and TRP Research Platform Leuven (TRPLe), Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter W Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bamps D, Macours L, Buntinx L, de Hoon J. Laser speckle contrast imaging, the future DBF imaging technique for TRP target engagement biomarker assays. Microvasc Res 2020; 129:103965. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2019.103965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
21
|
Beran J, Leroux-Roels G, Van Damme P, de Hoon J, Vandermeulen C, Al-Ibrahim M, Johnson C, Peterson J, Baker S, Seidl C, Dreisbach A, Karsten A, Corsaro B, Henry O, Lattanzi M, Bebia Z. Safety and immunogenicity of fully liquid and lyophilized formulations of an investigational trivalent group B streptococcus vaccine in healthy non-pregnant women: Results from a randomized comparative phase II trial. Vaccine 2020; 38:3227-3234. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
22
|
Suessenbach FK, Makowski N, Feickert M, Gangnus T, Tins J, Burckhardt BB, Läer S, Breitkreutz J, Klingmann I, Lagler F, de Hoon J, Dalinghaus M, Bajcetic M, de Wildt S, Clarke AK, Breur J, Male C, Ablonczy L, Mir T, Vukomanovic V, Dukic M, Jovanovic I, Burckhardt BB, Cawello W, Kleine K, Moder A, Obarcanin E, Wagner P, Walsh J, van Hecken A, Spatenkova L, Ali M, Božić B, Burdman MBI, Ciplea A, Faisal M, Farahani S, Feickert M, Gangnus T, Lazic M, Makowski N, Suessenbach F, van der Meulen M, Popović S, Parezanović M, Smeets N, Swoboda V, Bojanin D, Đorđević S, Dragić J, Holle AK, Jovičić B, Košutić J, Kozomara G, Majid H, Mitrović J, Ninić S, Parezanovic M, Parezanovic V, Pavlović A, Prijić S, Rebić B, Stefanović I, Tordas D, Vulićević I, Bartels A, Čeko A, Herborts M, Hennink A, Kosanović B, Kostic S, Isailović L, Maksimovic J, Manai B, Martinović N, Máté G, Perišić M, Reljić J, Salamomovic RPM, Schlesner C, Tins J, Wissmann E. A quality control system for ligand-binding assay of plasma renin activity: Proof-of-concept within a pharmacodynamic study. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2020; 181:113090. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.113090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
23
|
Goelen N, de Hoon J, Morales JF, Varon C, Van Huffel S, Augustijns P, Mols R, Herbots M, Verbeke K, Vanuytsel T, Tack J, Janssen P. Codeine delays gastric emptying through inhibition of gastric motility as assessed with a novel diagnostic intragastric balloon catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13733. [PMID: 31595608 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of opioids as analgesic is on the rise, despite their inhibitory effect on gastric emptying. A novel feeding catheter with integrated intragastric balloon was developed to continuously assess gastric motility, enabling to investigate the effect of opioids on motility and emptying simultaneously. We aimed to discriminate normal and pharmacologically impaired gastric motility and its impact on gastric emptying in healthy adults. METHODS The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System comprises a nasogastric balloon catheter and a monitoring unit. In a four-way randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study, subjects received either placebo or 58.8 mg codeine phosphate in combination with either an uninflated or an inflated (180 mL) balloon catheter. Motility-induced pressure changes were recorded for 6 hours. During the first 2 hours, nutrients were infused (225 kcal, 75 mL/h). Gastric emptying was assessed with a 13 C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). An algorithm, designed to detect phasic contractility, converted pressure changes to a gastric balloon motility index (GBMI). Results are presented as mean(SD). KEY RESULTS Eighteen subjects completed the investigation (32(13) years, 22(2) kg/m2 ). After codeine, GBMI was lower (0.31(0.16)) and GET½ was longer (233(57) minutes) compared with placebo (GBMI: 0.48(0.15), P < .01 and GET½: 172(12) minutes, P < .001). Within-subject ΔGET½ correlated significantly with ΔGBMI (r = -0.77 and P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System allowed to assess gastric motility safely and continuously. The correlation between pharmacologically decreased gastric emptying and motility indicates a strong link between both. Gastric motility, measured with this innovative device, can be an indicator for gastrointestinal intolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Goelen
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John F Morales
- Department of Electrical Engineering-ESAT, STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carolina Varon
- Department of Electrical Engineering-ESAT, STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabine Van Huffel
- Department of Electrical Engineering-ESAT, STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Augustijns
- Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raf Mols
- Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marissa Herbots
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristin Verbeke
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tim Vanuytsel
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation (LIFT), Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Janssen
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Breithaupt-Grögler K, Hardman T, de Hoon J, Donazzolo Y, Rottey S, Sourgens H, Stringer S. The New First-in-Human EMA Guideline: Disruptive or Constructive? Outcomes From the First EUFEMED Discussion Forum. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:398. [PMID: 31068811 PMCID: PMC6491518 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Federation for Exploratory Medicines Development (EUFEMED) organized a meeting in Leuven, Belgium entitled ‘The new FIH EMA guideline: Disruptive or constructive?’ to provide a forum for stakeholders to discuss the guideline’s operational impact. The revised EMA Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human (FIH) and early clinical trials with investigational products was published on 20 July 2017. The revision gave guidance on sentinel dosing/staggering of subjects within a multiple-ascending dose (MAD) clinical trial, permissible maximum exposure/investigation of supra-therapeutic doses and dose escalations above the no-observed adverse effect level. As the guidelines came into operation on 1 February, 2018 it was assumed that by the date of the meeting many early phase stakeholders had gathered sufficient first-hand experience of working within the guideline to discuss their thoughts on its impact. The concluding part of the meeting focused on the possible differences between European countries in handling the revised FIH guideline and ways of achieving harmonization. Information on current industry practice was gathered by online polling during the meeting, where perception of the revised guideline as either ‘disruptive’ or ‘constructive’ was explored at the start and at the end of the Forum along with recommendations on reducing future regulatory discordance. It was generally agreed that the necessary changes encompassed by new guidelines included both constructive and disruptive aspects. The final vote on whether the new FIH guideline is disruptive or constructive was taken by 69 delegates: 51% stated that it was both constructive and disruptive, 48% decided on constructive, none on disruptive and 1% were still undecided. It was generally accepted that stakeholders need to continue in a process of stakeholder engagement and discussion, particularly on critical safety issues. Such an approach allows partners to adopt a proactive approach to sharing best practice. For example, attendees agreed that a ‘Question and Answer’ document harmonized between the European agencies is required for the sentinel approach and for the selection of supratherapeutic doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim Hardman
- Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry, London, United Kingdom.,Niche Science & Technology Ltd., Richmond, United Kingdom
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Belgian Association of Phase-1 Units, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yves Donazzolo
- Association Francaise de Pharmacologie Translationnelle (Formally Le Club Phase 1), Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Rottey
- Belgian Association of Phase-1 Units, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Steffan Stringer
- Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gesquiere I, Steenackers N, Lannoo M, Foulon V, Mertens A, Gils A, de Hoon J, Augustijns P, Matthys C, Van der Schueren B. Predicting iron absorption from an effervescent iron supplement in obese patients before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a preliminary study. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2019; 52:68-73. [PMID: 30732902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Oral iron absorption is hampered in obese and bariatric patients, especially after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). As a result, iron deficiency, which is common in both patient groups, can be difficult to treat by oral supplements, often necessitating a switch to parenteral administration. The aim of this study was to find possible predictors of the extent of absorption of an effervescent iron gluconate oral supplement, which enables to pre-emptively identify those patients in which oral supplementation is likely to fail. METHODS The pharmacokinetic properties of 695 mg effervescent iron gluconate (80 mg Fe2+) were assessed in 13 obese patients (female = 10; mean age ± SD: 45.2 ± 12.5years) pre- and six months post-RYGB by measuring serum iron concentrations during 24 hours and by calculating the adjusted for baseline AUC0-24h, Cmax and Tmax. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the effect of hepcidin concentration, iron and hematologic indices, personal and anthropometric characteristics on iron absorption. Subsequently, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to propose the cut-off value for hepcidin concentrations above which obese patients are unlikely to benefit from oral iron supplementation. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. RESULTS Low iron status persisted after surgery as there was no significant difference observed in TSAT (17.3 ± 5.2 vs. 20.2 ± 6.6%), ferritin (91.8 ± 68.6 vs. 136.2 ± 176.9 μg/L) and hepcidin concentration (32.0 ± 30.1 vs. 28.3 ± 21.3 ng/mL) after RYGB. The absorption of effervescent iron gluconate was similar pre- and post-RYGB [AUC0-24h,pre-RYGB: 28.6 ± 10.8 μg/dL*h; AUC0-24h,post-RYGB: 27.5 ± 9.11 μg/dL*h (P = 0.84)]. Post-RYGB, iron AUC0-24h showed a strong negative correlation with both hepcidin concentrations and TSAT (R=-0.51; P = 0.08 and R=-0.81; P = 0.001), respectively. Pre-RYGB, there was a clear trend for the same negative correlations for hepcidin concentrations and TSAT (R=-0.47; P = 0.11 ;R=-0.41; P = 0.16), respectively. Taking pre-and post-RYGB data together, the negative correlations were confirmed for hepcidin concentrations and TSAT (R=-0.54; P = 0.004; R=-0.60; P = 0.001), respectively. The AUCROC = 0.87 (95%CI 0.71; 1.00) showed an optimal sensitivity/specificity cut-off at hepcidin concentrations of 26.8 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS The iron AUC0-24h showed a negative correlation with the hepcidin concentration and TSAT of obese patients, in particular post-RYGB. Therefore, our data support the use of hepcidin concentration and TSAT to distinguish potential responders from non-responders for iron supplementation particularly post-RYGB. Additionally, this study showed that the pharmacokinetic properties of iron gluconate from an effervescent tablet were unaffected by RYGB-surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Gesquiere
- KU Leuven, Department Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, and University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Nele Steenackers
- KU Leuven, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, and University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Matthias Lannoo
- KU Leuven, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, and University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Veerle Foulon
- KU Leuven, Department Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ann Mertens
- KU Leuven, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, and University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ann Gils
- KU Leuven, Department Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jan de Hoon
- University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Augustijns
- KU Leuven, Department Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Christophe Matthys
- KU Leuven, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, and University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bart Van der Schueren
- KU Leuven, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, and University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Faisal M, Cawello W, Burckhardt BB, de Hoon J, Laer S. Simultaneous Semi-Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Analysis of Enalapril and Enalaprilat Serum and Urine Concentrations From Child Appropriate Orodispersible Minitablets. Front Pediatr 2019; 7:281. [PMID: 31338356 PMCID: PMC6629781 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Enalapril is recommended as the first line of therapy and is proven to improve survival rates for treatment of Pediatric Heart Failure; however, an approved drug and child appropriate dosage formulation is still absent. The present analysis was conducted to perform a detailed model informed population pharmacokinetic analysis of prodrug enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat in serum and urine. Further, a model informed dosage form population-pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in pharmacokinetics of enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat when prodrug was administered to 24 healthy adults in a crossover, two periods, two treatments, phase I clinical trial using child-appropriate orodispersible mini-tablets (ODMT) and reference (Renitec®) dosage formulation. A simultaneous semi-mechanistic population-pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM software, which predicted full profile serum and urine concentrations of enalapril and enalaprilat. First-order conditional estimation with interaction was used for parameter estimation. Transit compartments added using Erlang distribution method to predicted enalapril absorption and enalaprilat formation phases. Normalized body weight was identified as covariate related to enalapril volume of distribution. Visual predictive check (VPC) plots and conducted bootstrap analysis validated the model. The data from the two formulations were pooled for population-pharmacokinetic analysis and covariate effect of the formulation was found on mean transit time (MTT1) of enalapril absorption. In addition, data of each formulation were modeled separately and the estimated parameters of each individual administered both formulations were correlated using paired samples Wilcoxon rank test (p < 0.05 = significant) which also showed only a significant difference (p = 0.03) in MTT1 i.e., 5 min early appearance of enalapril from ODMT compared to reference tablets. No difference in the pharmacokinetics of active enalaprilat was found from the ODMT compared to the reference formulation. The population pharmacokinetic analysis provided detailed information about the pharmacokinetics of enalapril and enalaprilat, which showed that the ODMT formulation might have similar pharmacodynamic response compared to the reference formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Faisal
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Willi Cawello
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bjoern B Burckhardt
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Laer
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Koole M, Schmidt ME, Hijzen A, Ravenstijn P, Vandermeulen C, Van Weehaeghe D, Serdons K, Celen S, Bormans G, Ceusters M, Zhang W, Van Nueten L, Kolb H, de Hoon J, Van Laere K. 18F-JNJ-64413739, a Novel PET Ligand for the P2X7 Ion Channel: Radiation Dosimetry, Kinetic Modeling, Test-Retest Variability, and Occupancy of the P2X7 Antagonist JNJ-54175446. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:683-690. [PMID: 30262518 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.216747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) is an adenosine triphosphate-gated ion channel that is predominantly expressed on microglial cells in the central nervous system. We report the clinical qualification of P2X7-specific PET ligand 18F-JNJ-64413739 in healthy volunteers, including dosimetry, kinetic modeling, test-retest variability, and blocking by the P2X7 antagonist JNJ-54175446. Methods: Whole-body dosimetry was performed in 3 healthy male subjects by consecutive whole-body PET/CT scanning, estimation of the normalized cumulated activity, and calculation of the effective dose using OLINDA (v1.1). Next, 5 healthy male subjects underwent a 120-min dynamic 18F-JNJ-64413739 PET/MRI scan with arterial blood sampling to determine the appropriate kinetic model. For this purpose, 1- and 2-tissue compartment models and Logan graphic analysis (LGA) were evaluated for estimating regional volumes of distribution (VT). PET/MRI scanning was repeated in 4 of these subjects to evaluate medium-term test-retest variability (interscan interval, 26-97 d). For the single-dose occupancy study, 8 healthy male subjects underwent baseline and postdose 18F-JNJ-64413739 PET/MRI scans 4-6 h after the administration of a single oral dose of JNJ-54175446 (dose range, 5-300 mg). P2X7 occupancies were estimated using a Lassen plot and regional baseline and postdose VT Results: The average (mean ± SD) effective dose was 22.0 ± 1.0 μSv/MBq. The 2-tissue compartment model was the most appropriate kinetic model, with LGA showing very similar results. Regional 2-tissue compartment model VT values were about 3 and were rather homogeneous across all brain regions, with slightly higher estimates for the thalamus, striatum, and brain stem. Between-subject VT variability was relatively high, with cortical VT showing an approximate 3-fold range across subjects. As for time stability, the acquisition time could be reduced to 90 min. The average regional test-retest variability values were 10.7% ± 2.2% for 2-tissue compartment model VT and 11.9% ± 2.2% for LGA VT P2X7 occupancy approached saturation for single doses of JNJ-54175446 higher than 50 mg, and no reference region could be identified. Conclusion: 18F-JNJ-64413739 is a suitable PET ligand for the quantification of P2X7R expression in the human brain. It can be used to provide insight into P2X7R expression in health and disease, to evaluate target engagement by P2X7 antagonists, and to guide dose selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Koole
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Anja Hijzen
- Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and
| | - Donatienne Van Weehaeghe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kim Serdons
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Celen
- Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Bormans
- Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Wei Zhang
- Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | | | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium .,Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vanhove T, de Jonge H, de Loor H, Oorts M, de Hoon J, Pohanka A, Annaert P, Kuypers DRJ. Relationship between In Vivo CYP3A4 Activity, CYP3A5 Genotype, and Systemic Tacrolimus Metabolite/Parent Drug Ratio in Renal Transplant Recipients and Healthy Volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos 2018; 46:1507-1513. [DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.081935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
29
|
Vanhove T, Annaert P, Knops N, de Loor H, de Hoon J, Kuypers DRJ. In vivo CYP3A4 activity does not predict the magnitude of interaction between itraconazole and tacrolimus from an extended release formulation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2018; 124:50-55. [DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Vanhove
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology; KU Leuven - University of Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - Pieter Annaert
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences; Drug Delivery and Disposition; KU Leuven- University of Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - Noël Knops
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Solid Organ Transplantation; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - Henriëtte de Loor
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology; KU Leuven - University of Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences; Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy; KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences; Center for Clinical Pharmacology; University Hospitals Leuven; KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - Dirk R J Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology; KU Leuven - University of Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Overbeeke E, De Beleyr B, de Hoon J, Westhovens R, Huys I. Perception of Originator Biologics and Biosimilars: A Survey Among Belgian Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Rheumatologists. BioDrugs 2018; 31:447-459. [PMID: 28929342 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-017-0244-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients and rheumatologists, current knowledge and perception of biosimilars in comparison with originator biologics is unknown. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate this knowledge and perception in Belgian rheumatologists and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS Anonymous web surveys were conducted in Belgian RA patients (n = 121) and rheumatologists (n = 41) during the period January-March 2016. The surveys covered topics on knowledge, similarity, price, preference, interchangeability, extrapolation and switching. Descriptive and statistical analyses of responses were performed. RESULTS Familiarity with biosimilars was reported by 49% of patients, of whom 77% knew what biosimilars were. RA patients equally questioned the proven efficacy of originators and biosimilars in RA, as well as their side effects and suitability. Furthermore, RA patients questioned the safety of biosimilars more often than that of originators (35 vs. 20%, respectively; p = 0.0094). Rheumatologists, more so than patients, expressed concerns that there might be differences between originators and biosimilars in terms of quality, safety, and price (p = 0.0292, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0129, respectively). The opinions of rheumatologists on interchangeability and extrapolation of indications varied. The price of an originator contributed substantially to the medicine preference of rheumatologists (p = 0.0002), but not patients. CONCLUSION Our study showed that rheumatologists, more so than patients, were convinced that there can be differences between originators and biosimilars. Despite safety being the major concern of patients, patients trusted their physician's decision to start on or switch to a biosimilar. The evolution of the uptake of biosimilars in Belgium might thus depend mainly on the perception of physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline van Overbeeke
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N2, Herestraat 49, Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Birgit De Beleyr
- Department of Pfizer Innovative Health Medical Affairs, Pfizer S.A., Pleinlaan 17, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rene Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N2, Herestraat 49, Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Hoon J, Van Hecken A, Vandermeulen C, Herbots M, Kubo Y, Lee E, Eisele O, Vargas G, Gabriel K. Phase 1, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of erenumab (AMG 334) and concomitant sumatriptan on blood pressure in healthy volunteers. Cephalalgia 2018; 39:100-110. [PMID: 29783863 PMCID: PMC6348461 DOI: 10.1177/0333102418776017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the effects of concomitant administration of erenumab and sumatriptan on resting blood pressure, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in healthy subjects. METHODS In this phase 1, parallel-group, one-way crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy adult subjects were randomized (1:2) to receive either intravenous placebo and subcutaneous sumatriptan 12 mg (i.e. two 6-mg injections separated by 1 hour) or intravenous erenumab 140 mg and subcutaneous sumatriptan 12 mg. Blood pressure was measured pre-dose and at prespecified times post-dose. The primary endpoint was individual time-weighted averages of mean arterial pressure, measured from 0 hours to 2.5 hours after the first dose of sumatriptan. Pharmacokinetic parameters for sumatriptan were evaluated by calculating geometric mean ratios (erenumab and sumatriptan/placebo and sumatriptan). Adverse events and anti-erenumab antibodies were also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 34 subjects were randomized and included in the analysis. Least squares mean (standard error) time-weighted averages of mean arterial pressure were 87.4 (1.0) mmHg for the placebo and sumatriptan group and 87.4 (1.2) mmHg for the erenumab and sumatriptan group. Mean difference in mean arterial pressure between groups was -0.04 mmHg (90% confidence interval: -2.2, 2.1). Geometric mean ratio estimates for maximum plasma concentration of sumatriptan was 0.95 (90% confidence interval: 0.82, 1.09), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 6 hours was 0.98 (90% confidence interval: 0.93, 1.03), and AUC from time 0 to infinity was 1.00 (90% confidence interval: 0.96, 1.05). No clinically relevant safety findings for co-administration of sumatriptan and erenumab were identified. CONCLUSION Co-administration of erenumab and sumatriptan had no additional effect on resting blood pressure or on pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02741310.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan de Hoon
- 1 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- 1 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- 1 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marissa Herbots
- 1 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yumi Kubo
- 2 Global Biostatistical Science, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Ed Lee
- 3 Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Osa Eisele
- 4 Global Patient Safety, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Gabriel Vargas
- 5 Neuroscience Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Gabriel
- 5 Neuroscience Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Postnov A, Schmidt ME, Pemberton DJ, de Hoon J, van Hecken A, van den Boer M, Zannikos P, van der Ark P, Palmer JA, Rassnick S, Celen S, Bormans G, van Laere K. Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibition by JNJ-42165279: A Multiple-Ascending Dose and a Positron Emission Tomography Study in Healthy Volunteers. Clin Transl Sci 2018; 11:397-404. [PMID: 29575526 PMCID: PMC6039207 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) potentiates endocannabinoid activity and is hypothesized to have therapeutic potential for mood and anxiety disorders and pain. The clinical profile of JNJ-42165279, an oral selective FAAH inhibitor, was assessed by investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and binding to FAAH in the brain of healthy human volunteers. Concentrations of JNJ-42165279 (plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine) and fatty acid amides (FAA; plasma, CSF), and FAAH activity in leukocytes was determined in a phase I multiple ascending dose study. A positron emission tomography study with the FAAH tracer [11 C]MK3168 was conducted to determine brain FAAH occupancy after single and multiple doses of JNJ-42165279. JNJ-42165279 administration resulted in an increase in plasma and CSF FAA. Significant blocking of brain FAAH binding of [11 C]MK3168 was observed after pretreatment with JNJ-42165279. JNJ-42165279 produces potent central and peripheral FAAH inhibition. Saturation of brain FAAH occupancy occurred with doses ≥10 mg of JNJ-42165279. No safety concerns were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Postnov
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,MEPhI National Research Nuclear University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mark E Schmidt
- Neuroscience Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Darrel J Pemberton
- Neuroscience Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne van Hecken
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Peter Zannikos
- Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - James A Palmer
- Janssen Research & Development, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Stef Rassnick
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sofie Celen
- Laboratory of Radiopharmaceutical Research of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Bormans
- Laboratory of Radiopharmaceutical Research of the KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen van Laere
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Van Bortel L, Sourgens H, Breithaupt-Grögler K, Caplain H, Donazzolo Y, Klingmann I, Hammond M, Hardman TC, Stringer S, de Hoon J. EUFEMED London Conference 2017: Exploratory Medicines Development: Innovation and Risk Management. Front Pharmacol 2018; 8:901. [PMID: 29387006 PMCID: PMC5776107 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The first formal conference of the EUropean Federation for Exploratory MEdicines Development (EUFEMED) held in London was the result of a collaborative effort of its founding associations: the Association for Applied Human Pharmacology (AGAH; Germany), the Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry (AHPPI; UK), the Belgian Association of Phase-I Units (BAPU; Belgium), and Club Phase-I (France). The conference focused on innovation and risk management in early clinical drug development. Among other innovations, immunotherapy in oncology and inflammatory diseases were discussed as well as the importance of adaptive trial designs in early clinical drug development. Consideration was given to assessing and mitigating risk in early clinical drug development, and included a preconference workshop. Different measures to minimize risks in healthy volunteers and patients in first-in-human trials were discussed in addition to the importance of non-clinical data, the need for reliable biomarkers, improved communication on adverse events (AEs) and well-trained study sites with ready access to intensive care units and clinical specialists. The need for a European-wide system for prevention of over-volunteering was also discussed. The conference provided opportunity to discuss these developments and concerns and the changing regulatory environment with stakeholders from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Presentations given by invited speakers are published on http://www.eufemed.eu/london-conference-2017/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Hammond
- Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy C Hardman
- Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steffan Stringer
- Association for Human Pharmacology in the Pharmaceutical Industry, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Belgian Association of Phase-I Units, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
de Hoon J, Van Hecken A, Vandermeulen C, Yan L, Smith B, Chen JS, Bautista E, Hamilton L, Waksman J, Vu T, Vargas G. Phase I, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single-dose, and Multiple-dose Studies of Erenumab in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Migraine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017; 103:815-825. [PMID: 28736918 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling are being explored as prophylactic treatments for migraine. Erenumab (AMG 334) is the first potent, selective, and competitive human mAb antagonist of the CGRP receptor. We report the data from two phase I studies assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of single and multiple administrations of erenumab in healthy subjects and patients with migraine. The results indicate that the PK profile of erenumab is nonlinear from 1 mg to 70 mg and the linear portion of the clearance from 70 mg to 210 mg is consistent with other human immunoglobulin G2 antibodies. Single doses of erenumab resulted in >75% inhibition of capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow, with no apparent dose-dependency for erenumab ≥21 mg. Erenumab was generally well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting further clinical development of erenumab for migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lucy Yan
- Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Brian Smith
- Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | | | - Edgar Bautista
- Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Lisa Hamilton
- Global Biostatistical Science, Amgen Ltd., Uxbridge, UK
| | | | - Thuy Vu
- Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Vargas
- Early Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Monteith D, Collins EC, Vandermeulen C, Van Hecken A, Raddad E, Scherer JC, Grayzel D, Schuetz TJ, de Hoon J. Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the CGRP Binding Monoclonal Antibody LY2951742 (Galcanezumab) in Healthy Volunteers. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8:740. [PMID: 29089894 PMCID: PMC5651004 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is pivotal in the pathophysiology of migraine headaches and represents a promising target for migraine treatment. The humanized monoclonal antibody galcanezumab (LY2951742) binds to CGRP and may be effective in migraine prophylaxis. Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of galcanezumab in humans. Secondary objectives included assessing the pharmacokinetics and evaluating target engagement. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (NCT 01337596) with single escalating and multiple subcutaneous (SC) doses of galcanezumab was performed in healthy male volunteers. Single doses of 1, 5, 25, 75, 200, and 600 mg of galcanezumab (n = 7/dose) or placebo (n = 2/dose) were injected SC in six consecutive cohorts of nine subjects each. One cohort of nine subjects received multiple (4) 150 mg doses of galcanezumab or placebo every other week. Target engagement was evaluated by measuring inhibition of capsaicin-induced increase in dermal blood flow (DBF). Findings: Sixty-three subjects were randomized and included in the safety analyses. Galcanezumab was well tolerated in single doses (1–600 mg SC) and consecutive doses (150 mg SC). There was no dose-dependent difference in type or frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events, and no clinically meaningful difference when compared with placebo. Pharmacokinetics were linear. Galcanezumab induced a robust, dose-dependent, and durable inhibition of capsaicin-induced increase in DBF, supporting the continued clinical development of galcanezumab for prophylaxis in migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Monteith
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Omeros Corporation, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eyas Raddad
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | | | - David Grayzel
- Arteaus Therapeutics, LLC, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vu T, Ma P, Chen JS, de Hoon J, Van Hecken A, Yan L, Wu LS, Hamilton L, Vargas G. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Erenumab (AMG 334) and Capsaicin-Induced Dermal Blood Flow in Healthy and Migraine Subjects. Pharm Res 2017; 34:1784-1795. [PMID: 28593473 PMCID: PMC5533838 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow (CIDBF) is a validated biomarker used to evaluate the target engagement of potential calcitonin gene-related peptide-blocking therapeutics for migraine. To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and quantify the inhibitory effects of erenumab (AMG 334) on CIDBF, CIDBF data were pooled from a single- and a multiple-dose study in healthy and migraine subjects. Methods Repeated capsaicin challenges and DBF measurements were performed and serum erenumab concentrations determined. A population analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Effects of body weight, gender, and age on model parameters were evaluated. Results Two-compartment target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model assuming binding of erenumab in the central compartment best described the nonlinear PK of erenumab. Subcutaneous absorption half-life was 1.6 days and bioavailability was 74%. Erenumab produced a maximum inhibition of 89% (95% confidence interval: 87–91%). Erenumab concentrations required for 50% and 99% of maximum inhibition were 255 ng/mL and 1134 ng/mL, respectively. Increased body weight was associated with increased erenumab clearance but had no effect on the inhibitory effect on CIDBF. Conclusions Our results show that erenumab pharmacokinetics was best characterized by a TMDD model and resulted in potent inhibition of CIDBF. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11095-017-2183-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy Vu
- Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling and Simulation, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320-1799, USA.
| | - Peiming Ma
- Clinical Pharmacology, GSK R&D, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lucy Yan
- Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling and Simulation, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320-1799, USA
| | - Liviawati Sutjandra Wu
- Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling and Simulation, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320-1799, USA
| | - Lisa Hamilton
- Global Biostatistical Sciences, Amgen Limited, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Gabriel Vargas
- Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling and Simulation, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320-1799, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lassen UN, Ramalingam SS, Lopez JS, Harvey RD, Ameratunga M, de Hoon J, Losic N, Lisby S, Forssmann U, Vergote I. GCT1021-01, a first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation trial with expansion cohorts to evaluate safety of Axl-specific antibody-drug conjugate (HuMax-Axl-ADC) in patients with solid tumors (NCT02988817). J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.tps2605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS2605 Background: HuMax-AXL-ADC is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of an Axl-specific human monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1κ) conjugated via a protease-cleavable valine-citrulline linker to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). In vivo, HuMax-AXL-ADC demonstrated therapeutic anti-tumor efficacy in patient-derived xenograft models representing a variety of solid cancers, including pancreas, thyroid, lung, esophageal, cervical cancers and malignant melanoma. The non-clinical safety profile and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once every 3 weeks (1Q3W) dosing schedule were established in cynomolgus monkeys. Methods: The primary objective of this trial is to determine the MTD and to establish the safety profile of HuMax-AXL-ADC in a mixed population of patients with specified solid tumors: ovarian, cervical, endometrial, thyroid cancer, NSCLC, and malignant melanoma. The trial consists of two parts, a phase I dose escalation part and a phase IIa expansion part. The dose escalation part explores two different dosing regimens: the first investigates doses from 0.3 up to 2.8 mg/kg to be administered 1Q3W. The second investigates doses in the range of 0.45 to 1.4 mg/kg to be administered weekly for 3 weeks followed by one treatment-free week (3Q4W dosing schedule). The second arm has a delayed start to inform a safe starting dose: when at least 8 patients have been evaluated for dose limiting toxicities, the 1.5 mg/kg cohort of the 1Q3W arm has been declared safe, and the predicted PK parameters of the starting dose in the 3Q4W arm are below pre-defined limits, the 3Q4W arm will be initiated. The 1Q3W arm follows a modified Bayesian Continuous Reassessment Method including escalation with overdose control in up to 41 patients on up to 7 main and 4 intermediate dose levels while the 3Q4W arm is run as a standard 3+3 trial design on up to 5-6 dose levels. In the phase IIa expansion part, further safety and biological activity data will be generated in selected indications using cohorts of 22 patients (11+11 patients in each cohort applying the Simon’s two-stage design). Clinical trial information: NCT 02988817.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suresh S. Ramalingam
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | - Malaka Ameratunga
- The Institue of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Ignace Vergote
- BGOG and University of Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Välitalo PA, Kemppainen H, Kulo A, Smits A, van Calsteren K, Olkkola KT, de Hoon J, Knibbe CAJ, Allegaert K. Body weight, gender and pregnancy affect enantiomer-specific ketorolac pharmacokinetics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83:1966-1975. [PMID: 28429492 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Although ketorolac analgesia is linked only to the S-enantiomer, there is limited information on the stereo-selective pharmacokinetics of this agent. We studied the stereo-selective pharmacokinetics of ketorolac in a pooled dataset of two studies, with women at delivery and 4-5 months postpartum, and males and nonpregnant females. METHODS Nonlinear mixed-effect modelling was used to evaluate the stereo-selective pharmacokinetics of ketorolac tromethamine after a single intravenous injection immediately after delivery (n = 41), 4-5 months postpartum (n = 8, paired), and in male (n = 12) and nonpregnant female (n = 14) subjects. All of the males and six of the nonpregnant females were recruited from another study, in which they were undergoing blood sampling for 24 h. All remaining cases underwent blood sampling for 8 h. RESULTS For both the R- and S-enantiomers, body weight affected ketorolac clearance. In addition, clearance for both enantiomers was 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15%, 58%] higher in male than in female subjects of the same body weight, and 55% (95% CI 33%, 78%) higher in women at delivery than in nonpregnant women of the same body weight. Women at delivery also had a 27% (95% CI 8%, 46%) higher distribution volume than nonpregnant women. The proportional effects of the covariates were not significantly different for the two ketorolac enantiomers. CONCLUSIONS Besides the anticipated impact of body weight on clearance, R- and S-ketorolac clearance is increased in male subjects and in women at delivery. To reach an exposure equivalent to that in nonpregnant women, males should receive a 36% increased ketorolac dose and pregnant women a 55% increased dose, in addition to a dose adjustment by body weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pyry A Välitalo
- Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Heidi Kemppainen
- Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.,School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Aida Kulo
- Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Anne Smits
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristel van Calsteren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Klaus T Olkkola
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catherijne A J Knibbe
- Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Karel Allegaert
- Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Buntinx L, Chang L, Amin A, Morlion B, de Hoon J. Development of an in vivo target-engagement biomarker for TRPA1 antagonists in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 83:603-611. [PMID: 27685892 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To develop a non-invasive, safe and reproducible target-engagement biomarker for future TRPA1 antagonists in healthy volunteers. METHODS Dose finding (n = 11): 3%, 10%, and 30% cinnamaldehyde (CA) and placebo (= vehicle) was topically applied on the right forearm. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni was used to compare between doses. Reproducibility: 10% CA doses were topically applied during one visit on both arms (n = 10) or during two visits (n = 23) separated by a washout period of 7 days. CA-induced dermal blood flow (DBF) was assessed by laser Doppler imaging (LDI) at baseline and at 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 min post-CA. Paired t-test was used to compare between arms or visits. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to assess reproducibility. Data are expressed as percent change from baseline (mean ± 95% CI). RESULTS All three doses increased DBF compared to vehicle at all time-points, with the maximum response at 10-20 min post-CA. Dose response was found when comparing AUC0-50min of 30% CA (51 364 ± 8475%*min) with 10% CA (32 239 ± 8034%*min, P = 0.03) and 3% CA (30 226 ± 11 958%*min, P = 0.015). 10% CA was chosen as an effective and safe dose. DBF response to 10% CA was found to be reproducible between arms (AUC0-50min , CCC = 0.91) and visits (AUC0-50min , CCC = 0.83). Based on sample size calculations, this model allows a change in CA-induced DBF of 30-50% to be detected between two independent groups of maximum 10-15 subjects with 80% power. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of CA-induced changes in DBF offers a safe, non-invasive and reproducible target-engagement biomarker in vivo in humans to evaluate TRPA1 antagonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linde Buntinx
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lin Chang
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aasim Amin
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ibrahimi K, Vermeersch S, Frederiks P, Geldhof V, Draulans C, Buntinx L, Lesaffre E, MaassenVanDenBrink A, de Hoon J. The influence of migraine and female hormones on capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow. Cephalalgia 2016; 37:1164-1172. [PMID: 27687880 DOI: 10.1177/0333102416668659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Migraine is much more common in females than in males, and occurrence is associated with changes in female sex hormones. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in migraine, and variations in female sex hormones may affect CGRP sensitivity and/or production. Objectives Investigate repeatability, gender differences, influence of the menstrual cycle and of migraine on CGRP-dependent changes in dermal blood flow (DBF). Methods CGRP-dependent increases in DBF were assessed using laser Doppler perfusion imaging after topical application of 300 or 1000 µg capsaicin on the forearm of healthy subjects and migraine patients. Results In healthy males, DBF response did not vary over time and was comparable with DBF in male migraineurs. In healthy females, capsaicin-induced DBF responses to both doses of capsaicin were higher during menstruation compared to the late-secretory phase (p < 0.05); this menstrual cycle dependence was absent in female migraine patients. Compared to healthy subjects, female migraineurs displayed a higher DBF response both during menstruation and during the late-secretory phase (p < 0.05). Conclusions An increased capsaicin-induced, CGRP-mediated DBF response was observed during menstruation in healthy women, but in female migraine patients this increased response was not affected by the menstrual cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khatera Ibrahimi
- 1 Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steve Vermeersch
- 2 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Frederiks
- 2 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Geldhof
- 2 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cedric Draulans
- 2 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Linde Buntinx
- 2 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Emmanuel Lesaffre
- 3 Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- 1 Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan de Hoon
- 2 Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Leurquin-Sterk G, Celen S, Van Laere K, Koole M, Bormans G, Langlois X, Van Hecken A, te Riele P, Alcázar J, Verbruggen A, de Hoon J, Andrés JI, Schmidt ME. What We Observe In Vivo Is Not Always What We See In Vitro: Development and Validation of 11C-JNJ-42491293, A Novel Radioligand for mGluR2. J Nucl Med 2016; 58:110-116. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.176628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
42
|
Gesquiere I, Hens B, Van der Schueren B, Mols R, de Hoon J, Lannoo M, Matthys C, Foulon V, Augustijns P. Drug disposition before and after gastric bypass: fenofibrate and posaconazole. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 82:1325-1332. [PMID: 27367040 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) alters the anatomical structure of the gastrointestinal tract, which can result in alterations in drug disposition. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the oral disposition of two compounds belonging to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System Class II - fenofibrate (bile salt-dependent solubility) and posaconazole (gastric pH-dependent dissolution) - before and after RYGB in the same individuals. METHODS A single-dose pharmacokinetic study with two model compounds - namely, 67 mg fenofibrate (Lipanthyl®) and 400 mg posaconazole (Noxafil®) - was performed in 12 volunteers pre- and post-RYGB. After oral administration, blood samples were collected at different time points up to 48 h after administration. Plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in order to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve up to 48 h (AUC0-48 h ), the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the time to reach peak concentration (Tmax ). RESULTS After administration of fenofibrate, no relevant differences in AUC0-48 h , Cmax and Tmax between the pre- and postoperative setting were observed. The geometric mean of the ratio of AUC0-48 h post/pre-RYGB for fenofibrate was 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87, 1.40; P = 0.40]. For posaconazole, an important decrease in AUC0-48 h and Cmax following RYGB was shown; the geometric mean of the AUC0-48 h post/pre-RYGB ratio was 0.68 (95% CI 0.48, 0.96; P = 0.03) and the geometric mean of the Cmax pre/post-RYGB ratio was 0.60 (95% CI 0.39, 0.94; P = 0.03). The decreased exposure of posaconazole could be explained by the increased gastric pH and accelerated gastric emptying of fluids post-RYGB. No difference for Tmax was observed. CONCLUSIONS The disposition of fenofibrate was not altered after RYGB, whereas the oral disposition of posaconazole was significantly decreased following RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Gesquiere
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Hens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Van der Schueren
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raf Mols
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Lannoo
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Surgery, KU Leuven/University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Matthys
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Augustijns
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Allegaert K, Peeters MY, Beleyn B, Smits A, Kulo A, van Calsteren K, Deprest J, de Hoon J, Knibbe CAJ. Paracetamol pharmacokinetics and metabolism in young women. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15:163. [PMID: 26566962 PMCID: PMC4644344 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0144-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is relevant between individual variability in paracetamol clearance in young women. In this pooled study, we focused on the population pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous paracetamol metabolism and its covariates in young women. Methods Population PK parameters using non-linear mixed effect modelling were estimated in a pooled dataset of plasma and urine PK studies in 69 young women [47 at delivery, 8/47 again 10–15 weeks after delivery (early postpartum), and 7/8 again 1 year after delivery (late postpartum), 22 healthy female volunteers with or without oral contraceptives]. Results Population PK parameters were estimated based on 815 plasma samples and 101 urine collections. Compared to healthy female volunteers (reference group) not on oral contraceptives, being at delivery was the most significant covariate for clearance to paracetamol glucuronide (Factor = 2.03), while women in early postpartum had decreased paracetamol glucuronidation clearance (Factor = 0.55). Women on contraceptives showed increased paracetamol glucuronidation clearance (Factor = 1.46). The oestradiol level did not further affect this model. Being at delivery did not prove significant for clearance to paracetamol sulphate, but was higher in pregnant women who delivered preterm (<37 weeks, Factor = 1.34) compared to term delivery and non-pregnant women. Finally, clearance of unchanged paracetamol was dependent on urine flow rate. Conclusions Compared to healthy female volunteers not on oral contraceptives, urine paracetamol glucuronidation elimination in young women is affected by pregnancy (higher), early postpartum (lower) or exposure to oral contraceptives (higher), resulting in at least a two fold variability in paracetamol clearance in young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel Allegaert
- NICU, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Mariska Y Peeters
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Bjorn Beleyn
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Anne Smits
- NICU, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Aida Kulo
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia Herzegovina.
| | - Kristel van Calsteren
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jan Deprest
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Organ Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Catherijne A J Knibbe
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. .,Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Buntinx L, Vermeersch S, de Hoon J. Development of anti-migraine therapeutics using the capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow model. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80:992-1000. [PMID: 26114340 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Revised: 06/02/2015] [Accepted: 06/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (receptor) (CGRP-(R)) blocking therapeutics in the treatment of acute migraine headache provided proof-of-concept for the involvement of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this disorder. One of the major hurdles for the development of any class of drugs, including CGRP blocking therapeutics, is the early clinical development process during which toxic and inefficacious compounds need to be eliminated as early as possible in order to focus on the most promising molecules. At this stage, human models providing proof of target engagement, combined with safety and tolerability studies, are extremely valuable in focusing on those therapeutics that have the highest engagement from the lowest exposure. They guide the go/no-go decision making, establish confidence in the candidate molecule by de-risking toxicity and safety issues and thereby speed up the early clinical development. In this review the focus is on the so called 'capsaicin model' as a typical example of a target engagement biomarker used as a human model for the development of CGRP blocking therapeutics. By applying capsaicin onto the skin, TRPV1 channels are activated and a CGRP-mediated increase in dermal blood flow can be quantified with laser Doppler perfusion imaging. Effective CGRP blocking therapeutics in turn, display blockade of this response. The translation of this biomarker model from animals to humans is discussed as well as the limitations of the assay in predicting the efficacy of anti-migraine drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linde Buntinx
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steve Vermeersch
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gheysens O, Postnov A, Deroose CM, Vandermeulen C, de Hoon J, Declercq R, Dennie J, Mixson L, De Lepeleire I, Van Laere K, Klimas M, Chakravarthy MV. Quantification, Variability, and Reproducibility of Basal Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake in Healthy Humans Using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2015; 56:1520-6. [PMID: 26229142 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED The quantification and variability of skeletal muscle glucose utilization (SMGU) in healthy subjects under basal (low insulin) conditions are poorly known. This information is essential early in clinical drug development to effectively interrogate novel pharmacologic interventions that modulate glucose uptake. The aim of this study was to determine test-retest characteristics and variability of SMGU within and between healthy subjects under basal conditions. Furthermore, different kinetic modeling strategies were evaluated to find the best-fitting model to assess SMGU studied by 18F-FDG. METHODS Six healthy male volunteers underwent 2 dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with an interval of 24 h. Subjects were admitted to the clinical unit to minimize variability in daily activities and food intake and restrict physical activity. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of gluteal and quadriceps muscle area were obtained with arterial input. Regions of interest were drawn over the muscle area to obtain time-activity curves and standardized uptake values (SUVs) between 60 and 90 min. Spectral analysis of the data and kinetic modeling was performed using 2-tissue-irreversible (2T3K), 2-tissue-reversible, and 3-tissue-sequential-irreversible (3T5KS) models. Reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and within-subject coefficient of variation (WSCV). RESULTS SUVs in gluteal and quadriceps areas were 0.56±0.09 and 0.64±0.07. ICCs (with 90% confidence intervals in parentheses) were 0.88 (0.64-0.96) and 0.96 (0.82-0.99), respectively, for gluteal and quadriceps muscles, and WSCV for gluteal and quadriceps muscles was 2.2% and 3.6%, respectively. The rate of glucose uptake into muscle was 0.0016±0.0004 mL/mL⋅min, with an ICC of 0.94 (0.93-0.95) and WSCV of 6.6% for the 3T5KS model, whereas an ICC of 0.98 (0.92-1.00) and WSCV of 2.8% was obtained for the 2T3K model. 3T5KS demonstrated the best fit to the measured experimental points. CONCLUSION Minimal variability in skeletal muscle glucose uptake was observed under basal conditions in healthy subjects. SUV measurements and rate of glucose uptake values were reproducible, with an average WSCV of less than 5%. Compared with SUV, the 3-tissue model adds information about kinetics between blood, intra- and intercellular compartments, and phosphorylation that may highlight the exact mechanisms of metabolic changes after pharmacologic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Gheysens
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrey Postnov
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Justin Dennie
- Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey
| | - Lori Mixson
- Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey
| | | | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Klimas
- Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gesquiere I, Darwich AS, Van der Schueren B, de Hoon J, Lannoo M, Matthys C, Rostami A, Foulon V, Augustijns P. Drug disposition and modelling before and after gastric bypass: immediate and controlled-release metoprolol formulations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80:1021-30. [PMID: 25917170 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aim of the present study was to evaluate the disposition of metoprolol after oral administration of an immediate and controlled-release formulation before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery in the same individuals and to validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for predicting oral bioavailability following RYGB. METHODS A single-dose pharmacokinetic study of metoprolol tartrate 200 mg immediate release and controlled release was performed in 14 volunteers before and 6-8 months after RYGB. The observed data were compared with predicted results from the PBPK modelling and simulation of metoprolol tartrate immediate and controlled-release formulation before and after RYGB. RESULTS After administration of metoprolol immediate and controlled release, no statistically significant difference in the observed area under the curve (AUC(0-24 h)) was shown, although a tendency towards an increased oral exposure could be observed as the AUC(0-24 h) was 32.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36, 63.5] and 55.9% (95% CI 5.73, 106) higher following RYGB for the immediate and controlled-release formulation, respectively. This could be explained by surgery-related weight loss and a reduced presystemic biotransformation in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. The PBPK values predicted by modelling and simulation were similar to the observed data, confirming its validity. CONCLUSIONS The disposition of metoprolol from an immediate-release and a controlled-release formulation was not significantly altered after RYGB; there was a tendency to an increase, which was also predicted by PBPK modelling and simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Gesquiere
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adam S Darwich
- Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bart Van der Schueren
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Lannoo
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Matthys
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven and Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amin Rostami
- Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Augustijns
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Krekels EHJ, van Ham S, Allegaert K, de Hoon J, Tibboel D, Danhof M, Knibbe CAJ. Developmental changes rather than repeated administration drive paracetamol glucuronidation in neonates and infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 71:1075-82. [PMID: 26139379 PMCID: PMC4532713 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-015-1887-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Based on recovered metabolite ratios in urine, it has been concluded that paracetamol glucuronidation may be up-regulated upon multiple dosing. This study investigates paracetamol clearance in neonates and infants after single and multiple dosing using a population modelling approach. Methods A population pharmacokinetic model was developed in NONMEM VI, based on paracetamol plasma concentrations from 54 preterm and term neonates and infants, and on paracetamol, paracetamol-glucuronide and paracetamol-sulphate amounts in urine from 22 of these patients. Patients received either a single intravenous propacetamol dose or up to 12 repeated doses. Results Paracetamol and metabolite disposition was best described with one-compartment models. The formation clearance of paracetamol-sulphate was 1.46 mL/min/kg1.4, which was about 5.5 times higher than the formation clearance of the glucuronide of 0.266 mL/min/kg. The renal excretion rate constants of both metabolites was estimated to be 11.4 times higher than the excretion rate constant of unchanged paracetamol, yielding values of 0.580 mL/min/kg. Developmental changes were best described by bodyweight in linear relationships on the distribution volumes, the formation of paracetamol-glucuronide and the unchanged excretion of paracetamol, and in an exponential relationship on the formation of paracetamol-sulphate. There was no evidence for up-regulation or other time-varying changes in any of the model parameters. Simulations with this model illustrate how paracetamol-glucuronide recovery in urine increases over time due to the slower formation of this metabolite and in the absence of up-regulation. Conclusions Developmental changes, described by bodyweight-based functions, rather than up-regulation, explain developmental changes in paracetamol disposition in neonates and infants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1887-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke H J Krekels
- Division of Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vermeersch S, Benschop RJ, Van Hecken A, Monteith D, Wroblewski VJ, Grayzel D, de Hoon J, Collins EC. Translational Pharmacodynamics of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody LY2951742 in a Capsaicin-Induced Dermal Blood Flow Model. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2015; 354:350-7. [PMID: 26116630 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.115.224212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is being developed for migraine prevention and osteoarthritis pain. To support the clinical development of LY2951742, capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow (DBF) was used as a target engagement biomarker to assess CGRP activity in nonhuman primates and healthy volunteers. Inhibition of capsaicin-induced DBF in nonhuman primates, measured with laser Doppler imaging, was dose dependent and sustained for at least 29 days after a single intravenous injection of the CGRP antibody. This information was used to generate a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, which correctly predicted inhibition of capsaicin-induced DBF in humans starting at a single subcutaneous 5-mg dose. As expected, the degree of inhibition in capsaicin-induced DBF increased with higher LY2951742 plasma concentrations. Utilization of this pharmacodynamic biomarker with pharmacokinetic data collected in phase I studies provided the dose-response relationship that assisted in dose selection for the phase II clinical development of LY2951742.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Vermeersch
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - Robert J Benschop
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - Anne Van Hecken
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - David Monteith
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - Victor J Wroblewski
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - David Grayzel
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - Jan de Hoon
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| | - Emily C Collins
- Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (S.V., A.V.H., J.d.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (R.J.B., D.M., V.J.W., E.C.C.); and Atlas Venture, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Van Laere KJ, Sanabria-Bohórquez SM, Mozley DP, Burns DH, Hamill TG, Van Hecken A, De Lepeleire I, Koole M, Bormans G, de Hoon J, Depré M, Cerchio K, Plalcza J, Han L, Renger J, Hargreaves RJ, Iannone R. (11)C-MK-8278 PET as a tool for pharmacodynamic brain occupancy of histamine 3 receptor inverse agonists. J Nucl Med 2013; 55:65-72. [PMID: 24263088 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.122515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED The histamine 3 (H3) receptor is a presynaptic autoreceptor in the central nervous system that regulates the synthesis and release of histamine and modulates the release of other major neurotransmitters. H3 receptor inverse agonists (IAs) may be efficacious in the treatment of various central nervous system disorders, including excessive daytime sleepiness, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Alzheimer disease, ethanol addiction, and obesity. METHODS Using PET and a novel high-affinity and selective radioligand (11)C-MK-8278, we studied the tracer biodistribution, quantification, and brain H3 receptor occupancy (RO) of MK-0249 and MK-3134, 2 potential IA drugs targeting cerebral H3 receptors, in 6 healthy male subjects (age, 19-40 y). The relationship among H3 IA dose, time on target, and peripheral pharmacokinetics was further investigated in 15 healthy male volunteers (age, 18-40 y) with up to 3 PET scans and 3 subjects per dose level. RESULTS The mean effective dose for (11)C-MK-8278 was 5.4 ± 1.1 μSv/MBq. Human brain kinetics showed rapid high uptake and fast washout. Binding potential values can be assessed using the pons as a reference region, with a test-retest repeatability of 7%. Drug RO data showed low interindividual variability per dose (mean RO SD, 2.1%), and a targeted 90% RO can be reached for both IAs at clinically feasible doses. CONCLUSION (11)C-MK-8278 is a useful novel PET radioligand for determination of human cerebral H3 receptor binding and allows highly reproducible in vivo brain occupancy of H3-targeting drugs, hereby enabling the evaluation of novel compounds in early development to select doses and schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koenraad J Van Laere
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hostetler ED, Joshi AD, Sanabria-Bohórquez S, Fan H, Zeng Z, Purcell M, Gantert L, Riffel K, Williams M, O’Malley S, Miller P, Selnick HG, Gallicchio SN, Bell IM, Salvatore CA, Kane SA, Li CC, Hargreaves RJ, de Groot T, Bormans G, Van Hecken A, Derdelinckx I, de Hoon J, Reynders T, Declercq R, De Lepeleire I, Kennedy WP, Blanchard R, Marcantonio EE, Sur C, Cook JJ, Van Laere K, Evelhoch JL. In Vivo Quantification of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Occupancy by Telcagepant in Rhesus Monkey and Human Brain Using the Positron Emission Tomography Tracer [11C]MK-4232. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013; 347:478-86. [DOI: 10.1124/jpet.113.206458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|