1
|
Margalit-Yehuda R, Maradey-Romero C, Davidov Y, Ram E, Carter D. Comparison of etiological and physiological characteristics of fecal incontinence in men and women. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2024; 326:G274-G278. [PMID: 38193161 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00113.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is often underreported and underestimated in men. Our aims were to clarify the causes and the physiological characteristics of FI in men and to underline the differences between etiological and physiological factors in men and women diagnosed with FI. The study cohort encompassed 200 men and 200 women who underwent anatomical and physiological evaluation for FI in a tertiary referral center specializing in pelvic floor disorders. All patients underwent endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Evacuation proctography was performed in some patients. Demographic, medical, anatomical, and physiological parameters were compared between the two study groups. Urge incontinence was the most frequent type of FI in both genders. In men, anal fistula, history of anal surgeries, rectal tumors, and pelvic radiotherapy were common etiologic factors, whereas history of pelvic surgeries was more common in women. Associated urinary incontinence was reported more frequently by women. External anal sphincter defects, usually anterior, were more common in women (M: 1.5%, F: 24%, P < 0.0001), whereas internal anal sphincter defect prevalence was similar in men and women (M: 6%, F: 12%, P = 0.19). Decreased resting and squeeze pressures were less common in men (M: 29%, F: 46%, P < 0.0001: M: 44%, F: 66%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of rectal hyposensitivity was higher in men (M: 11.1%, F: 2.8%, P < 0.0001), whereas rectal hypersensitivity was higher in women (M: 5.8%, F: 10.8%, P < 0.0001). Anorectal dyssynergia was more common in men (M: 66%, F: 37%, P < 0.0001). Significantly different etiological factors and physiological characteristics for FI were found in men. Acknowledging these differences is significant and may yield better treatment options.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Fecal incontinence (FI) in men has different etiological factors when compared with women. The prevalence of internal anal sphincter defect among men with FI was similar to women. Different manometric measurements were found among men with FI: decreased anal pressures were less common among men, whereas rectal hyposensitivity and anorectal dyssynergia were more common among men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuma Margalit-Yehuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Carla Maradey-Romero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yana Davidov
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Liver Diseases Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
| | - Edward Ram
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Surgery and Transplantations, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
| | - Dan Carter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trzpis M, Sun G, Chen JH, Huizinga JD, Broens P. Novel insights into physiological mechanisms underlying fecal continence. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2023; 324:G1-G9. [PMID: 36283962 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00313.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The machinery maintaining fecal continence prevents involuntary loss of stool and is based on the synchronized interplay of multiple voluntary and involuntary mechanisms, dependent on cooperation between motor responses of the musculature of the colon, pelvic floor, and anorectum, and sensory and motor neural pathways. Knowledge of the physiology of fecal continence is key toward understanding the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence. The idea that involuntary contraction of the internal anal sphincter is the primary mechanism of continence and that the external anal sphincter supports continence only by voluntary contraction is outdated. Other mechanisms have come to the forefront, and they have significantly changed viewpoints on the mechanisms of continence and incontinence. For instance, involuntary contractions of the external anal sphincter, the puborectal muscle, and the sphincter of O'Beirne have been proven to play a role in fecal continence. Also, retrograde propagating cyclic motor patterns in the sigmoid and rectum promote retrograde transit to prevent the continuous flow of content into the anal canal. With this review, we aim to give an overview of primary and secondary mechanisms controlling fecal continence and evaluate the strength of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Trzpis
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ge Sun
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ji-Hong Chen
- Department of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jan D Huizinga
- Department of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Paul Broens
- Department of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Osawa I. Effect of posture on anorectal manometric measurements in female patients with fecal incontinence and rectoanal intussusception. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:479. [PMID: 36418959 PMCID: PMC9682782 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02581-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the influence of erect position on anorectal manometry in patients with rectoanal intussusception (RAI). METHODS This was a single center prospective observational study. Eighty female patients with fecal incontinence (FI) who underwent defecography between 1st January 2016 and 30th April 2022 were included. The effect of posture on commonly measured parameters during manometry was assessed in the left-lateral and erect positions. The severity of FI was assessed using FI Severity Index (FISI). RESULTS Defecography showed that 30 patients had circumferential RAI (CRAI), and 50 had non-CRAI. There were no significant differences in age, parity, FI type, and FISI scores between the groups. However, FISI scores were significantly lower in 51 patients with passive FI than 12 patients with mixed FI type [21 (8-38) vs. 32 (8-43), P = 0.007]. Endo-anal ultrasound showed no significant difference in the incidence of sphincter defects between the groups. Maximum squeeze pressure was significantly lower in the erect position than in the left-lateral position in the CRAI patients [119 cm H2O (59‒454 cm H2O) vs. 145 cm H2O (65‒604 cm H2O), P = 0.006] however, this finding was not observed in the non-CRAI group and the subgroup of anterior RAI patients. In either group, maximum resting pressure, defecation desire volume, and maximum tolerated volume were significantly higher, while anal canal length was significantly shorter in the erect position than in the left-lateral position, respectively. CONCLUSION Voluntary contraction in female FI patients with CRAI was suppressed in the erect position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Tsunoda
- grid.414927.d0000 0004 0378 2140Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-Cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba 296-8602 Japan
| | - Tomoko Takahashi
- grid.414927.d0000 0004 0378 2140Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-Cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba 296-8602 Japan
| | - Ikuko Osawa
- grid.414927.d0000 0004 0378 2140Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-Cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba 296-8602 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bharucha AE, Basilisco G, Malcolm A, Lee TH, Hoy MB, Scott SM, Rao SSC. Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14335. [PMID: 35220645 PMCID: PMC9418387 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anorectal manometry (ARM) comprehensively assesses anorectal sensorimotor functions. PURPOSE This review examines the indications, techniques, interpretation, strengths, and weaknesses of high-resolution ARM (HR-ARM), 3-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-HR-ARM), and portable ARM, and other assessments (i.e., rectal sensation and rectal balloon expulsion test) that are performed alongside manometry. It is based on a literature search of articles related to ARM in adults. HR-ARM and 3D-HR-ARM are useful for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD), to identify anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction and guide management in patients with fecal incontinence (FI), constipation, megacolon, and megarectum; and to screen for anorectal structural (e.g., rectal intussusception) abnormalities. The rectal balloon expulsion test is a useful, low-cost, radiation-free, outpatient assessment tool for impaired evacuation that is performed and interpreted in conjunction with ARM. The anorectal function tests should be interpreted with reference to age- and sex-matched normal values, clinical features, and results of other tests. A larger database of technique-specific normal values and newer paradigms of analyzing anorectal pressure profiles will increase the precision and diagnostic utility of HR-ARM for identifying abnormal mechanisms of defecation and continence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Guido Basilisco
- UO Gastroenterologia, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Matthew B Hoy
- Mayo Medical Library, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - S Mark Scott
- National Bowel Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rasijeff AMP, García‐Zermeño K, Di Tanna G, Remes‐Troche J, Knowles CH, Scott MS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of anal motor and rectal sensory dysfunction in male and female patients undergoing anorectal manometry for symptoms of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:562-576. [PMID: 35023242 PMCID: PMC9303800 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM Manometry is the best established technique to assess anorectal function in faecal incontinence. By systematic review, pooled prevalences of anal hypotonia/hypocontractility and rectal hypersensitivity/hyposensitivity in male and female patients were determined in controlled studies using anorectal manometry. METHODS Searches of MEDLINE and Embase were completed. Screening, data extraction and bias assessment were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed based on a random effects model with heterogeneity evaluated by I2 . RESULTS Of 2116 identified records, only 13 studies (2981 faecal incontinence patients; 1028 controls) met the inclusion criteria. Anal tone was evaluated in 10 studies and contractility in 11; rectal sensitivity in five. Only three studies had low risk of bias. Pooled prevalence of anal hypotonia was 44% (95% CI 32-56, I2 = 96.35%) in women and 27% (95% CI 14-40, I2 = 94.12%) in men. The pooled prevalence of anal hypocontractility was 69% (95% CI 57-81; I2 = 98.17%) in women and 36% (95% CI 18-53; I2 = 96.77%) in men. Pooled prevalence of rectal hypersensitivity was 10% (95% CI 4-15; I2 = 80.09%) in women and 4% (95% CI 1-7; I2 = 51.25%) in men, whereas hyposensitivity had a pooled prevalence of 7% (95% CI 5-9; I2 = 0.00%) in women compared to 19% (95% CI 15-23; I2 = 0.00%) in men. CONCLUSIONS The number of appropriately controlled studies of anorectal manometry is small with fewer still at low risk of bias. Results were subject to gender differences, wide confidence intervals and high heterogeneity indicating the need for international collective effort to harmonize practice and reporting to improve certainty of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika M. P. Rasijeff
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology UnitBlizard InstituteCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery & TraumaQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Karla García‐Zermeño
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology UnitBlizard InstituteCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery & TraumaQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Gian‐Luca Di Tanna
- George Institute for Global HealthUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - José Remes‐Troche
- Instituto de Investigaciones Médico BiológicasUniversidad VeracruzanaVeracruzMéxico
| | - Charles H. Knowles
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology UnitBlizard InstituteCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery & TraumaQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Mark S. Scott
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology UnitBlizard InstituteCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery & TraumaQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Woo M, Pandey A, Gill H, Li D, Buresi M, Nasser Y, Sawhney S, Andrews CN. Manometric parameters, when measured with the 3-dimensional high-definition anorectal manometry probe, poorly predict prolonged balloon expulsion time. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14180. [PMID: 34125464 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are little data evaluating the performance of the 3-dimensional high-definition anorectal manometry (3D-HDAM) system in the diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation. Physical properties of the thicker, rigid, 3D-HDAM probe may have implications on the measurements of anorectal pressures. AIM Our aim was to compare 3D-HDAM to balloon expulsion test and magnetic resonance (MR) defecography. METHODS Consecutive constipated patients referred for anorectal function testing at the Calgary Gut Motility Centre (Calgary, Canada) between 2014 and 2019 were assessed. All patients underwent anorectal manometry with the 3D-HDAM probe, and a subset underwent BET or MR defecography. Anorectal manometric variables were compared between patients who had normal and abnormal BET. RESULTS Over the study period, 81 patients underwent both 3D-HDAM and BET for symptoms of constipation. 52 patients expelled the balloon within 3 minutes. Patients with abnormal BET had significantly lower rectoanal pressure differential (RAPD) (-61 vs. -31 mmHg for normal BET, p = 0.03) and defecation index (0.29 vs. 0.56, p = 0.03). On logistic regression analysis, RAPD (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p = 0.03) remained a negative predictor of abnormal BET. On ROC analysis, RAPD had an AUC of 0.65. There was good agreement between dyssynergic patterns on 3D-HDAM and defecographic evidence of dyssynergia (sensitivity 80%, specificity 90%, PLR 9, NLR 0.22, accuracy 85%). CONCLUSIONS Manometric parameters, when measured with the 3D-HDAM probe, poorly predict prolonged balloon expulsion time. RAPD remains the best predictor of prolonged balloon expulsion time. The 3D-HDAM probe may not be the ideal tool to diagnose functional defecatory disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Woo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Armaan Pandey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Harman Gill
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Dorothy Li
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michelle Buresi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Yasmin Nasser
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Summit Sawhney
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher N Andrews
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Understanding the physiology of human defaecation and disorders of continence and evacuation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 18:751-769. [PMID: 34373626 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-021-00487-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The act of defaecation, although a ubiquitous human experience, requires the coordinated actions of the anorectum and colon, pelvic floor musculature, and the enteric, peripheral and central nervous systems. Defaecation is best appreciated through the description of four phases, which are, temporally and physiologically, reasonably discrete. However, given the complexity of this process, it is unsurprising that disorders of defaecation are both common and problematic; almost everyone will experience constipation at some time in their life and many will develop faecal incontinence. A detailed understanding of the normal physiology of defaecation and continence is critical to inform management of disorders of defaecation. During the past decade, there have been major advances in the investigative tools used to assess colonic and anorectal function. This Review details the current understanding of defaecation and continence. This includes an overview of the relevant anatomy and physiology, a description of the four phases of defaecation, and factors influencing defaecation (demographics, stool frequency/consistency, psychobehavioural factors, posture, circadian rhythm, dietary intake and medications). A summary of the known pathophysiology of defaecation disorders including constipation, faecal incontinence and irritable bowel syndrome is also included, as well as considerations for further research in this field.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cuong LM, Van Quyet H, Hung TM, Anh NN, Ha TT, Van Du V, Van Loi D, Khai HHH, Kien VD. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy young adults: evidence from Vietnam. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:295. [PMID: 34266417 PMCID: PMC8281378 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01865-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) has been developed to improve measurement of anorectal functions. This study aims to identify normal HRAM values in healthy young Vietnamese adults. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study at the National Hospital of Traditional Medicine (Hanoi, Vietnam) from July through December 2014. Healthy young adults were invited to participate in the study. All anorectal measurement values were performed using the ISOLAB high-resolution manometry system. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student's t-tests. RESULTS Thirty healthy young adults, including 15 males and 15 females aged 19-26 years, were recruited. Mean functional anal canal length was 3.4 ± 0.5 cm (range: 2.4-4.8 mm). Mean maximum resting pressure, mean maximum squeezing pressure, mean maximum coughing pressure, and mean maximum strain pressure were 65.5, 168.0, 125.9, and 84.2 mm Hg, respectively. All anal pressure values were significantly different between males and females. For rectal sensation measurements, only the volume at first sensation was significantly higher in males than in females. CONCLUSIONS This study provides normal HRAM value for healthy young adults in Vietnam. Sex may influence anal pressure and first rectal sensation values in this cohort. Further studies should be conducted in order to improve the quality of HRAM normal values and to confirm the effects of sex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Manh Cuong
- National Hospital of Traditional Medicine, No. 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem Street, Hanoi, Vietnam.
| | - Ha Van Quyet
- Hanoi Medical University, No. 1 Ton That Tung Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tran Manh Hung
- Bach Mai Hospital, No. 78 Giai Phong Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Ngoc Anh
- Hanoi Medical University, No. 1 Ton That Tung Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tran Thu Ha
- National Hospital of Traditional Medicine, No. 29 Nguyen Binh Khiem Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Vu Van Du
- National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, No. 43 Trang Thi Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Do Van Loi
- National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, No. 43 Trang Thi Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Ha Huu Hoang Khai
- Hanoi Medical University, No. 1 Ton That Tung Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Vu Duy Kien
- OnCare Medical Technology Company Limited, No. 77/508 Lang Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Frawley H, Shelly B, Morin M, Bernard S, Bø K, Digesu GA, Dickinson T, Goonewardene S, McClurg D, Rahnama'i MS, Schizas A, Slieker-Ten Hove M, Takahashi S, Voelkl Guevara J. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Neurourol Urodyn 2021; 40:1217-1260. [PMID: 33844342 DOI: 10.1002/nau.24658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The terminology for female and male pelvic floor muscle (PFM) assessment has expanded considerably since the first PFM function and dysfunction standardization of terminology document in 2005. New terms have entered assessment reports, and new investigations to measure PFM function and dysfunction have been developed. An update of this terminology was required to comprehensively document the terms and their definitions, and to describe the assessment method and interpretation of the finding, to standardize assessment procedures and aid diagnostic decision making. METHODS This report combines the input of members of the Standardisation Committee of the International Continence Society (ICS) Working Group 16, with contributions from recognized experts in the field and external referees. A logical, sequential, clinically directed assessment framework was created against which the assessment process was mapped. Within categories and subclassifications, each term was assigned a numeric coding. A transparent process of 12 rounds of full working group and external review was undertaken to exhaustively examine each definition, plus additional extensive internal development, with decision making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS A Terminology Report for the symptoms, signs, investigations, and diagnoses associated with PFM function and dysfunction, encompassing 185 separate definitions/descriptors, has been developed. It is clinically based with the most common assessment processes defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by clinicians and researchers of different disciplines. CONCLUSION A consensus-based Terminology Report for assessment of PFM function and dysfunction has been produced to aid clinical practice and be a stimulus for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Frawley
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Beth Shelly
- Beth Shelly Physical Therapy, Moline, Illinois, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy, Saint Ambrose University Davenport, Iowa, USA
| | - Melanie Morin
- School of Rehabilitation Faculty of Medecine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Stéphanie Bernard
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kari Bø
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu
- Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tamara Dickinson
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Mohammad S Rahnama'i
- Uniklinik RWTH, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Society of Urological Research and Education (SURE), Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexis Schizas
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marijke Slieker-Ten Hove
- Department Gynaecology, University of Erasmus, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy, ProFundum Instituut, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rasijeff AMP, Garcia-Zermeno K, Carrington EV, Knowles C, Scott SM. Systematic evaluation of cough-anorectal pressure responses in health and in fecal incontinence: A high-resolution anorectal manometry study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e13999. [PMID: 33150700 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anorectal manometry is the most commonly performed test of anorectal function. The cough-anorectal response is frequently assessed as part of a routine manometric investigation but has not previously been the subject of detailed analysis. This study systematically examined anorectal pressure responses to cough in health and evaluated the impact of parity and symptoms of fecal incontinence (FI) on measurements. METHODS High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) traces from nulliparous (n = 25) and parous (n = 25) healthy volunteers (HV: aged 41, range 18-64), and 57 parous patients with FI (age 47, range 28-72) were retrospectively reviewed. Cough-anorectal pressure responses were analyzed between groups by qualitative and quantitative approaches. KEY RESULTS In health, traditional anal pressure measurements ("rest" and "squeeze") were similar between nulliparous and parous women. In contrast, incremental anal-rectal pressure difference during cough significantly differed: nulliparous 42 mm Hg (95% CI: 21-64) vs. parous 6 mm Hg (-14-25), P < 0.036). This measure also differed significantly between nulliparous HVs and patients with FI (-2 mm Hg (95% CI: -15-12), P < 0.001), but not between parous HVs and FI. Qualitatively, a color-contour trace resembling a "spear" in the upper anal canal was observed uniquely in FI. Of 25 patients with normal anal function by traditional measures, cough parameters were abnormal in 52%. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Novel HR-ARM measures during coughing revealed differences in anal function between nulliparous and parous HV, and patients with FI, which were not detected by traditional measures. Cough-anorectal measurements may improve manometric yield, though clinical utility would require assessment by longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika M P Rasijeff
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Karla Garcia-Zermeno
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Emma V Carrington
- Colorectal Unit, Surgical Professorial Unit, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Charles Knowles
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S Mark Scott
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vollebregt PF, Wiklendt L, Ang D, Venn ML, Mekhael M, Christensen P, Dinning PG, Knowles CH, Scott SM. Altered anal slow-wave pressure activity in low anterior resection syndrome: short case series in two independent specialist centres provide new mechanistic insights. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:444-450. [PMID: 33342038 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Conventional parameters (anal resting and squeeze pressures) measured with anorectal manometry (ARM) fail to identify anal sphincter dysfunction in many patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). We aimed to assess whether there are differences in anal canal slow-wave pressure activity in LARS patients and healthy individuals. METHOD High-resolution ARM (HR-ARM) traces of 21 consecutive male LARS patients referred to the Royal London Hospital, UK (n = 12) and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (n = 9) were compared with HR-ARM data from 37 healthy men. RESULTS Qualitatively (by visual inspection of HR-ARM recordings), the frequency of slow-wave pressure activity was strikingly different in 11/21 (52.4%) LARS patients from that observed in all the healthy individuals. Quantitative analysis showed that peaks of the mean spectrum in these 11 LARS patients occurred at approximately 6-7 cycles per minute (cpm), without activity at higher frequencies. An equivalent pattern was found in only 2/37 (5.4%) healthy individuals (P < 0.0001). Peaks of the mean spectrum in healthy individuals were concentrated at 16 cpm and 3-4 cpm. CONCLUSION Over half of the male LARS patients studied had altered anal slow-wave pressure activity based on analysis of HR-ARM recordings. Further studies could investigate the relative contributions of sex, human baseline variance and neoadjuvant/surgical therapies on anal slow waves, and correlate the presence of abnormal activity with symptom severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul F Vollebregt
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lukasz Wiklendt
- College of Medicine and Public Health and Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University, Discipline of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Daphne Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mary L Venn
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mira Mekhael
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Phil G Dinning
- College of Medicine and Public Health and Centre for Neuroscience, Flinders University, Discipline of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Charles H Knowles
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S Mark Scott
- National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fomenko OY, Morozov SV, Scott S, Knowles H, Morozov DA, Shelygin YA, Maev IV, Nikityuk DB, Shkoda AS, Kashnikov VN, Bordin DS, Isakov VA, Biryukov OM, Belousova SV, Pimenova ES, Rumiantsev AS, Fedorov ED, Gvozdev MY, Trukhmanov AS, Storonova OA, Indeykina LH, Biryukova MG, Andreev DN, Kucheryavyy YA, Achkasov SI. [Recommendations for the Protocol of functional examination of the anorectal zone and disorders classification: the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group consensus and Russian real-world practice]. TERAPEVT ARKH 2020; 92:105-119. [PMID: 33720582 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.12.200472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of anorectal function testing including anorectal manometry (focused on high-resolution manometry), the rectal sensory test, and the balloon expulsion test. Based on these measurements, a classification system for disorders of anorectal function is proposed. Aim to provide information about methods of diagnosis and new classification of functional anorectal disorders to a wide range of specialists general practitioners, therapists, gastroenterologists, coloproctologists all who face the manifestations of these diseases in everyday practice and determine the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. Current paper provides agreed statements of IAPWG Consensus and comments (in italics) of Russian experts on real-world practice, mainly on methodology of examination. These comments in no way intended to detract from the provisions agreed by the international group of experts. We hope that these comments will help to improve the quality of examination based on the systematization of local experience with the use of the methods discussed and the results obtained. Key recommendations: the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group protocol for the performance of anorectal function testing recommends a standardized sequence of maneuvers to test rectoanal reflexes, anal tone and contractility, rectoanal coordination, and rectal sensation. Major findings not seen in healthy controls defined by the classification are as follows: rectoanal areflexia, anal hypotension and hypocontractility, rectal hyposensitivity, and hypersensitivity. Minor and inconclusive findings that can be present in health and require additional information prior to diagnosis include anal hypertension and dyssynergia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Y Fomenko
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
| | - S V Morozov
- Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology
| | - S Scott
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
| | - H Knowles
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
| | - D A Morozov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - Y A Shelygin
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
| | - I V Maev
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | - D B Nikityuk
- Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | - V N Kashnikov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
| | - D S Bordin
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center
- Tver State Medical University
| | - V A Isakov
- Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology
| | - O M Biryukov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
| | - S V Belousova
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
| | - E S Pimenova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | - E D Fedorov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
| | - M Y Gvozdev
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | - A S Trukhmanov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - O A Storonova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - L H Indeykina
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center
- Research Institute of Health Care Organization and Medical Management
| | - M G Biryukova
- Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology
| | - D N Andreev
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | - Y A Kucheryavyy
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
- Ilyinsky Hospital
| | - S I Achkasov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heitmann PT, Rabbitt P, Schloithe AC, Wattchow DA, Scott SM, Dinning PG. The relationships between the results of contemporary tests of anorectal structure and sensorimotor function and the severity of fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13946. [PMID: 32683767 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic investigations for fecal incontinence (FI) assess the structure and sensorimotor function of the anorectum. Investigations include anorectal manometry, anorectal sensory testing, pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML), and endoanal sonography. The severity of FI and results of investigations are often discordant and the rate of symptom resolution following treatment remains <40%. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-US) have been introduced during the last decade. This study aims to assess the strength of relationships between contemporary investigation results and FI severity. METHODS Adults presenting for investigation of FI were assessed using the St Mark's FI severity score (SMIS), HRAM, anorectal sensory testing, PNTML, and 3D-US. KEY RESULTS 246 patients were included. There were significant relationships between the SMIS and HRAM (resting pressure rs = -0.23, 95% CI = (-0.34, -0.11), P < .001; squeeze pressure (rs = -0.26, 95% CI = (-0.37, -0.14), P < .001) and 3D-US (anterior EAS length rs = -0.22, 95% CI = (-0.34, -0.09), P = .001). The relationships between SMIS and HRAM had a greater effect size in those with urge-predominant symptoms (resting pressure: rs = -0.40, 95% CI = (-0.57, -0.20), P < .001, squeeze pressure: rs = -0.34, 95% CI = (-0.52, -0.12), P = .003). Overall, the variance in SMIS accounted for by anorectal investigations was 8.6% (R2 = 0.098, adjusted R2 = 0.086, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Anorectal investigations are not strong predictors of FI severity. These findings may reflect the multifactorial, heterogeneous pathophysiology of FI, the limitations of the SMIS and anorectal investigations, and contributing factors extrinsic to the anorectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T Heitmann
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Departments of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Philippa Rabbitt
- Departments of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Ann C Schloithe
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David A Wattchow
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Departments of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - S Mark Scott
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Phil G Dinning
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Departments of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sharma M, Muthyala A, Feuerhak K, Puthanmadhom Narayanan S, Bailey KR, Bharucha AE. Improving the utility of high-resolution manometry for the diagnosis of defecatory disorders in women with chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13910. [PMID: 32613711 PMCID: PMC7529936 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the utility of existing and modified versions of high-resolution manometry for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD). METHODS In 64 healthy and 136 constipated women, we compared left lateral (LL) and seated manometry, and analyzed with existing (ManoView™) and new methods, for discriminating between constipated patients with normal and prolonged rectal balloon expulsion time (BET). In both positions, the rectoanal gradient (RAG) and, for the new analysis, the pressure topography pattern during evacuation were used to discriminate between constipated patients without and with DD. KEY RESULTS The BET was prolonged, suggestive of a DD, in 52 patients (38%). During evacuation, rectoanal pressures and the RAG were greater in the seated than the LL position (P≤.001). The new analysis identified 4 rectoanal pressure patterns. In the seated position, the BET was associated with the pattern (P=.0001), being prolonged in, respectively, 45%, 15%, 53%, and 0% of patients with minimal change, anal relaxation, paradoxical contraction, and transmission. Within each pattern, the RAG was greater (ie, less negative, P<.0001) in patients with a normal than a prolonged BET. Compared to the ManoView™ RAG in the LL position, the integrated analysis (ie, pattern and new RAG) in the LL position (P<.01) and the seated ManoView™ gradient (P=.02) were more effective for discriminating between constipated patients without and with DD. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Anorectal HRM ideally should be performed in the more physiological seated position and analyzed by a two-tier approach, which incorporates the overall pattern followed by the rectoanal gradient. These findings reinforce the utility of manometry for diagnosing DD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anjani Muthyala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kelly Feuerhak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Kent R Bailey
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Scott SM, Carrington EV. The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22:55. [PMID: 32935278 PMCID: PMC7497505 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00793-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Objective measurement of anorectal sensorimotor function is a requisite component in the clinical evaluation of patients with intractable symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Regrettably, the utility of the most established and widely employed investigations for such measurement (anorectal manometry (ARM), rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test) has been limited by wide variations in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS This article summarizes the recently published International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) consensus and London Classification of anorectal disorders, together with relevant allied literature, to provide guidance on the indications for, equipment, protocol, measurement definitions and results interpretation for ARM, rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test. The London Classification is a standardized method and nomenclature for description of alterations in anorectal motor and sensory function using office-based investigations, adoption of which should bring much needed harmonization of practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mark Scott
- Neurogastroenterology Group and GI Physiology Unit, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
| | - Emma V Carrington
- Neurogastroenterology Group and GI Physiology Unit, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
- Surgical Professorial Unit, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leo CA, Cavazzoni E, Leeuwenburgh MMN, Thomas GP, Dennis A, Bassett P, Hodgkinson JD, Warusavitarne J, Murphy J, Vaizey CJ. Comparison between high-resolution water-perfused anorectal manometry and THD ® Anopress anal manometry: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:923-930. [PMID: 31994307 PMCID: PMC7496679 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Anorectal physiology tests provide a functional assessment of the anal canal. The aim of this study was to compare the results generated by standard high-resolution water-perfused manometry (WPM) with the newer THD® Anopress manometry system. METHOD This was a prospective observational study. Conventional manometry was carried out using a water-perfused catheter with high-resolution manometry and compared with the Anopress system with air-filled catheters. All patients underwent the two procedures successively in a randomized order. Time to arrive at the resting pressure plateau, resting, squeeze, straining pressure and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain were recorded. A qualitative analysis of the two devices was performed. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2017, 60 patients were recruited. The time from insertion of the catheter to arriving at the resting pressure plateau was significantly lower with the Anopress compared with WPM: 12 s [interquartile range (IQR) 10-17 s] versus 100 s (IQR 67-121 s) (P < 0.001). A strong correlation between the manometric values of WPM and the Anopress was observed. Both procedures were well tolerated, although the VAS score for insertion of the WPM catheter was significantly higher. The Anopress was easier to use and more time-efficient than the WPM. CONCLUSION The pressure values obtained with Anopress correlated well with those of conventional manometry. The Anopress has the advantage of being less time-consuming, user-friendly and better tolerated by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. A. Leo
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology UnitSt Mark’s Hospital Academic InstituteHarrowUK,Imperial College of LondonLondonUK,The Royal London HospitalLondonUK
| | - E. Cavazzoni
- Santa Maria della Misericordia HospitalUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaPerugiaItaly
| | | | - G. P. Thomas
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology UnitSt Mark’s Hospital Academic InstituteHarrowUK
| | - A. Dennis
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology UnitSt Mark’s Hospital Academic InstituteHarrowUK
| | | | - J. D. Hodgkinson
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology UnitSt Mark’s Hospital Academic InstituteHarrowUK,Imperial College of LondonLondonUK
| | - J. Warusavitarne
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology UnitSt Mark’s Hospital Academic InstituteHarrowUK
| | | | - C. J. Vaizey
- Sir Alan Park’s Physiology UnitSt Mark’s Hospital Academic InstituteHarrowUK
| |
Collapse
|