1
|
Tietto A, Faggin S, Scarpignato C, Savarino EV, Giron MC. Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2024. [PMID: 39189409 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2397433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Revised: 07/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (p-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (U.S.A. and Brazil or Mexico, respectively). AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the current knowledge on p-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed. EXPERT OPINION p-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted p-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, microbial dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic p-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Tietto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- School of Specialization in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Sofia Faggin
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Carmelo Scarpignato
- Department of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, Msida, Malta
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Maria Cecilia Giron
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang N, Han M, Zheng QW, Zhang MY, Zhi WL, Li JJ, Cui LX, Tian JL, Wang Y, Fang SQ. A scientometrics analysis and visualization of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1393526. [PMID: 39139634 PMCID: PMC11319146 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (refractory GERD) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by unresponsiveness or poor efficacy to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). This chronic disorder substantially weakens patients' mental wellbeing and quality of life, increasing the financial burden on society. Multiple articles have been reported in this area. However, literature involving scientometric analysis of refractory GERD is absent. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the evolution of research themes and the main hotspots of refractory GERD through bibliometric methods. Methods All documents related to refractory GERD based on the WOS Core Collection from January 2000 to November 2023 were selected for analysis. Citespace V 6.1 R6, VOSviewer V 1.6.20, and Scimago Graphica V 1.0.38 were used to perform bibliometric analysis. Results We collected a total of 241 research articles from 36 countries and 322 institutions, contributed by over 1,000 authors. Over the last 20 years, the number of articles in this field has increased year by year, and since 2011, the number of publications has increased dramatically, with 85.89% of the papers. These countries are led by the United States and Japan. GUT had the highest number of citations and DIGESTION had the highest number of publications. Research on standardized diagnosis and management, mechanisms, novel monitoring methods, and innovative drugs and procedures for refractory GERD are the main topics and hotspots in this field. This study also found that neuroimmune interaction is closely related to refractory GERD, which may be a new direction for future mechanism research. Conclusion Our study is the first bibliometric analysis of the global literature on refractory GERD. This research provides valuable insights for researchers, enabling them to quickly understand the research frontier and hot topics of this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sheng-Quan Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seo S, Jung HK, Gyawali CP, Lee HA, Lim HS, Jeong ES, Kim SE, Moon CM. Treatment Response With Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Based on Clinical Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 30:259-271. [PMID: 38972863 PMCID: PMC11238110 DOI: 10.5056/jnm24024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically managed based on the clinical phenotype. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) in patients with various clinical GERD phenotypes. Methods Core databases were searched for studies comparing PCABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in clinical GERD phenotypes of erosive reflux disease (ERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), PPI-resistant GERD and night-time heartburn. Additional analysis was performed based on disease severity and drug dosage, and pooled efficacy was calculated. Results In 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the initial treatment of ERD, the risk ratio for healing with PCABs versus PPIs was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13) at 2 weeks and 1.03 (95% CI, 1.00-1.07) at 8 weeks, respectively. PCABs exhibited a significant increase in both initial and sustained healing of ERD compared to PPIs in RCTs, driven particularly in severe ERD (Los Angeles grade C/D). In 3 NERD RCTs, PCAB was superior to placebo in proportion of days without heartburn. Observational studies on PPI-resistant symptomatic GERD reported symptom frequency improvement in 86.3% of patients, while 90.7% showed improvement in PPIresistant ERD across 5 observational studies. Two RCTs for night-time heartburn had different endpoints, limiting meta-analysis. Pronounced hypergastrinemia was observed in patients treated with PCABs. Conclusions Compared to PPIs, PCABs have superior efficacy and faster therapeutic effect in the initial and maintenance therapy of ERD, particularly severe ERD. While PCABs may be an alternative treatment option in NERD and PPI-resistant GERD, findings were inconclusive in patients with night-time heartburn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seungyeon Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hye Ah Lee
- Clinical Trial Center, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Seok Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eui Sun Jeong
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Eun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Mo Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xue C, Du Y, Yang H, Jin H, Zhao Y, Ren B, Dong Z. Evaluating vonoprazan and tegoprazan for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment in Chinese Healthcare: an EVIDEM framework analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:208. [PMID: 38902604 PMCID: PMC11188247 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03297-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Chinese healthcare settings, drug selection decisions are predominantly influenced by the Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee (PTC). This study evaluates two recently introduced potassium-competitive acid blockers, vonoprazan (VPZ) and tegoprazan (TPZ), utilizing the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking (EVIDEM) framework. METHODS The study employed the 10th edition of EVIDEM, which includes a core model with five domains and 13 criteria. Two independent expert panels were involved: the PTC expert panel, tasked with assigning weights using a 5-point scale, defining scoring indicators, examining the evidence matrix, scoring, and decision-making; and the evidence matrix expert panel, responsible for conducting a systematic literature review, creating the evidence matrix, and evaluating the value contributions of VPZ and TPZ. RESULTS The analysis estimated the value contributions of VPZ and TPZ to be 0.59 and 0.54, respectively. The domain of 'economic consequences of intervention' showed the most significant variation in value contribution between the two drugs, followed by 'comparative outcomes of intervention' and 'type of benefit of intervention'. CONCLUSION Employing the EVIDEM framework, VPZ's value contribution was found to be marginally superior to that of TPZ. The EVIDEM framework demonstrates potential for broader application in Chinese medical institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaojun Xue
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yuhan Du
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Haotian Yang
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Huixin Jin
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yue Zhao
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Bingnan Ren
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhanjun Dong
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krause AJ, Kaizer AM, Carlson DA, Chan WW, Chen CL, Gyawali CP, Jenkins A, Pandolfino JE, Polamraju V, Wong MW, Greytak M, Yadlapati R. Validated Clinical Score to Predict Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients With Chronic Laryngeal Symptoms: COuGH RefluX. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:1200-1209.e1. [PMID: 38309491 PMCID: PMC11128352 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Discerning whether laryngeal symptoms result from gastroesophageal reflux is clinically challenging and a reliable tool to stratify patients is needed. We aimed to develop and validate a model to predict the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms. METHODS This multicenter international study collected data from adults with chronic laryngeal symptoms who underwent objective testing (upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring) between March 2018 and May 2023. The training phase identified a model with optimal receiver operating characteristic curves, and β coefficients informed a weighted model. The validation phase assessed performance characteristics of the weighted model. RESULTS A total of 856 adults, 304 in the training cohort and 552 in the validation cohort, were included. In the training phase, the optimal predictive model (area under the curve, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.74), was the Cough, Overweight/obesity, Globus, Hiatal Hernia, Regurgitation, and male seX (COuGH RefluX) score, with a lower threshold of 2.5 and an upper threshold of 5.0 to predict proven GERD. In the validation phase, the COuGH RefluX score had an area under the curve of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71), with 79% sensitivity and 81% specificity for proven GERD. CONCLUSIONS The externally validated COuGH RefluX score is a clinically practical model to predict the likelihood of proven GERD. The score classifies most patients with chronic laryngeal symptoms as low/high likelihood of proven GERD, with only 38% remaining as indeterminate. Thus, the COuGH RefluX score can guide diagnostic strategies and reduce inappropriate proton pump inhibitor use or testing for patients referred for evaluation of chronic laryngeal symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Krause
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Alexander M Kaizer
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Dustin A Carlson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Walter W Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chien-Lin Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrew Jenkins
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John E Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vinathi Polamraju
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ming-Wun Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Madeline Greytak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alzahrani MA, Alqaraawi AM, Alzubide SR, Abufarhaneh E, Alkhowaiter SS, Alsulaimi M, Alkhiari R, AlMalki AS, Alfadda AA, Aljahdli ES, Alsohaibani FI, AlLehibi AH, Almadi MA. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2024:00936815-990000000-00086. [PMID: 38813746 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_82_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common problems encountered in outpatient general medicine and gastroenterology clinics. GERD may present with classic esophageal symptoms, extraesophageal symptoms, or mixed symptoms. The diagnosis and treatment of GERD are challenging due to the variety of symptoms and multifactorial pathophysiology. Since there is no consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of GERD in Saudi Arabia, the Saudi Gastroenterology Association established an expert group to formulate a consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD to update health-care providers in Saudi Arabia. The expert group reviewed the literature including recently published international guidelines, clinical trials, and expert opinion and conducted virtual and in-person meetings. A total of 22 statements on the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of GERD were formulated, and three algorithms for the clinical care of GERD were developed with a detailed description for each step. The expert group endorsed the new definition of GERD, the practical principles of interpretation of the diagnostic GERD evaluation, and the practical guidance for GERD treatment including medical, surgical, and endoscopic therapy. The expert group recommends further studies to investigate local data on the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Alzahrani
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah M Alqaraawi
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed R Alzubide
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ehab Abufarhaneh
- Liver and Small Bowel Health Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad S Alkhowaiter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Resheed Alkhiari
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed S AlMalki
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman A Alfadda
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Emad S Aljahdli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Unit, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad I Alsohaibani
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abid H AlLehibi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majid A Almadi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pasta A, Pelizzaro F, Marabotto E, Calabrese F, Formisano E, Djahandideh Sheijani S, Brandimarte G, Manes G, Gravina AG, Savarino EV. Patient journey in gastroesophageal reflux disease: real-world perspectives from Italian gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, and ENT specialists. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17:17562848241239590. [PMID: 38524789 PMCID: PMC10960349 DOI: 10.1177/17562848241239590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a challenging condition that involves different physicians, such as general practitioners (GPs), gastroenterologists, and ears, nose and throat (ENT) specialists. A common approach consists of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) administration. Adjunctive pharmacological treatment may have a role in the management of non-responders to PPIs. Objectives We aimed to survey GPs and different medical specialists to investigate the medical approaches to patients reporting GERD symptoms. In addition, we examined the use of adjunctive pharmacological treatments in patients with GERD symptoms who do not respond to PPIs. Design Retrospective observational study. Methods A survey was conducted among a large sample of gastroenterologists, GPs, and ENT specialists. Symptoms were divided into typical and extraesophageal, and their severity and impact on quality of life were explored with the GERD Impact Scale and with Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). All therapies administered usually for GERD were investigated. Results A total of 6211 patients were analyzed in this survey. Patients with typical symptoms were 53.5%, while those with extraesophageal symptoms were 46.5%. The latter were more frequently reported by ENT patients (53.6%, p < 0.0001). The GSI was higher in patients followed by gastroenterologists (9 points) and GPs (9 points) than ENT specialists (8 points), but the RSI was higher in the ENT group (14.3 ± 6.93) than in GPs and gastroenterologist groups (10.36 ± 6.36 and 10.81 ± 7.30, p < 0.0001). Chest pain had the highest negative impact on quality of life (p < 0.0001). Of the 3025 patients who used PPIs, non-responders showed a lower GSI when treated with a combination of adjunctive pharmacological treatments and bioadhesive compounds, than with single-component drugs. Conclusion Patients with GERD referred to a gastroenterologist had more severe disease and poorer quality of life. The combination of adjunctive pharmacological treatments and bioadhesive compounds seems to be effective in the management of PPI refractory patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pasta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Filippo Pelizzaro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elena Formisano
- Nutritional Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Brandimarte
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Cristo Re Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampiero Manes
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Rho, Italy
| | - Antonietta Gerarda Gravina
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitell’, Naples, Italy
- Andrea Pasta; Elisa Marabotto; Francesco Calabrese; Shirin Djahandideh Sheijaniare also affiliated to IRCCS, Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padua 35128, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kahrilas P, Anastasiou F, Bredenoord AJ, El Serag HB, Labenz J, Mendive J, Savarino EV, Sifrim D, Udrescu M, Yadlapati R, Hungin AP. Proton Pump Inhibitors: Rational Use and Use-Reduction - The Windsor Workshop. Dig Dis 2024; 42:211-220. [PMID: 38513623 DOI: 10.1159/000538399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite deprescribing initiatives to curb overutilization of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), achieving meaningful reductions in PPI use is proving a challenge. SUMMARY An international group of primary care doctors and gastroenterologists examined the literature surrounding PPI use and use-reduction to clarify: (i) what constitutes rational PPI prescribing; (ii) when and in whom PPI use-reduction should be attempted; and (iii) what strategies to use when attempting PPI use-reduction. KEY MESSAGES Before starting a PPI for reflux-like symptoms, patients should be educated on potential causes and alternative approaches including dietary and lifestyle modification, weight loss, and relaxation strategies. When commencing a PPI, patients should understand the reason for treatment, planned duration, and review date. PPI use at hospital discharge should not be continued without a recognized indication for long-term treatment. Long-term PPI therapy should be reviewed at least annually. PPI use-reduction should be based on the lack of a rational indication for long-term PPI use, not concern for PPI-associated adverse events. PPI use-reduction strategies involving switching to on-demand PPI or dose tapering, with rescue therapy for rebound symptoms, are more likely to succeed than abrupt cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Foteini Anastasiou
- 4th Local Primary Care Team, Municipality Practice and Academic Practice of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hashem B El Serag
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joachim Labenz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jung-Stilling-Hospital, Siegen, Germany
| | - Juan Mendive
- La Mina Primary Care Academic Centre, Catalan Health Institute, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - A Pali Hungin
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Professor Emeritus, Primary Care and General Practice, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moraes-Filho JPP, Domingues G, Chinzon D. BRAZILIAN CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (BRAZILIAN FEDERATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, FBG). ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23154. [PMID: 38511797 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition in Brazil, affecting 12% to 20% of the urban population, with significant implications for patient quality of life and potential for complications. OBJECTIVE This paper focuses on the recent update of the Brazilian guidelines for GERD, a necessary revision due to advancements in knowledge and practice since the last publication over a decade ago. The update pays particular attention to the role and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acknowledging the growing concerns about their long-term use, adverse events, and overprescription. METHODS The methodology of the guideline update involved an extensive literature review in multiple languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese), drawing from major databases such as Medline, Embase, and SciELO-Lilacs. RESULTS This comprehensive approach resulted in a carefully curated selection of studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, specifically focusing on PPIs and other therapeutic strategies for GERD. The updated guidelines are presented in a user-friendly question-and-answer format, adhering to the PICO system (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) for clarity and ease of interpretation. The recommendations are supported by robust scientific evidence and expert opinions, enhancing their practical applicability in clinical settings. To ensure the reliability and clarity of the recommendations, the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was employed. This system categorizes the strength of recommendations as strong, weak, or conditional and classifies evidence quality as high, moderate, low, or very low. These classifications provide insight into the confidence level of each recommendation and the likelihood of future research impacting these guidelines. CONCLUSION The primary aim of these updated guidelines is to offer practical, evidence-based advice for the management of GERD in Brazil, ensuring that healthcare professionals are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to deliver optimal patient care. BACKGROUND •Gastrointestinal specialists rely heavily on guidelines to manage digestive pathologies effectively. The Brazilian clinical guideline for therapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an invaluable tool for these specialists. BACKGROUND •It critically analyzes practical aspects of therapy through 12 questions covering a wide range of topics, from behavioral measures to surgical and endoscopic indications. BACKGROUND •The recommendations in this guideline are justified using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), and experienced experts provide comments and suggestions at the end of each question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerson Domingues
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| | - Decio Chinzon
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marabotto E, Pasta A, Calabrese F, Ribolsi M, Mari A, Savarino V, Savarino EV. The Clinical Spectrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Facts and Fictions. Visc Med 2024:1-8. [DOI: 10.1159/000536583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
<b><i>Background:</i></b> This review addresses the intricate spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition affecting 10–30% of the Western population. GERD is characterized by the backflow of gastric contents into the esophagus, causing typical and atypical symptoms. Its pathophysiology involves various factors such as hiatal hernia, esophageal motor disorders, and dietary triggers. The review explores the complexities of GERD spectrum, including nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and functional heartburn (FH). <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The diagnostic process for GERD, based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, encompasses clinical evaluation, endoscopy, and functional tests, including pH-impedance and wireless-pH monitoring. NERD, a significant subset of GERD, is defined by reflux symptoms and abnormal reflux burden without mucosal damage. RH, classified under functional esophageal disorders by Rome IV criteria, presents with typical esophageal symptoms associated with reflux but lacks of structural, inflammatory, or motor causes. FH is identified by heartburn with normal endoscopy, reflux testing, and esophageal manometry results. The management of RH and FH, focusing on reducing esophageal hypersensitivity, varies from standard GERD treatments. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> The review emphasizes the necessity of personalized treatment strategies due to the complexity and overlap of GERD subtypes. It highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving gastroenterologists, psychologists, and other specialists, to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. The article underscores that understanding the distinctions and overlaps among NERD, RH, and FH is crucial for effective management, and the need for innovative approaches in diagnosis and treatment to address the unique challenges of each subtype.
Collapse
|
11
|
Olmos JA, Pandolfino JE, Piskorz MM, Zamora N, Valdovinos Díaz MA, Remes Troche JM, Guzmán M, Hani A, Valdovinos García LR, Pitanga Lukashok H, Domingues G, Vesco E, Rivas MM, Ovalle LFP, Cisternas D, Vela MF. Latin American consensus on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14735. [PMID: 38225792 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be challenging given varying symptom presentations, and complex multifactorial pathophysiology. The gold standard for GERD diagnosis is esophageal acid exposure time (AET) measured by pH-metry. A variety of additional diagnostic tools are available. The goal of this consensus was to assess the individual merits of GERD diagnostic tools based on current evidence, and provide consensus recommendations following discussion and voting by experts. METHODS This consensus was developed by 15 experts from nine countries, based on a systematic search of the literature, using GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) methodology to assess the quality and strength of the evidence, and provide recommendations regarding the diagnostic utility of different GERD diagnosis tools, using AET as the reference standard. KEY RESULTS A proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial is appropriate for patients with heartburn and no alarm symptoms, but nor for patients with regurgitation, chest pain, or extraesophageal presentations. Severe erosive esophagitis and abnormal reflux monitoring off PPI are clearly indicative of GERD. Esophagram, esophageal biopsies, laryngoscopy, and pharyngeal pH monitoring are not recommended to diagnose GERD. Patients with PPI-refractory symptoms and normal endoscopy require reflux monitoring by pH or pH-impedance to confirm or exclude GERD, and identify treatment failure mechanisms. GERD confounders need to be considered in some patients, pH-impedance can identify supragrastric belching, impedance-manometry can diagnose rumination. CONCLUSIONS Erosive esophagitis on endoscopy and abnormal pH or pH-impedance monitoring are the most appropriate methods to establish a diagnosis of GERD. Other tools may add useful complementary information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Olmos
- Neurogastroenterology Sector, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - John E Pandolfino
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - María M Piskorz
- Neurogastroenterology Sector, Hospital de Clinicas Jose de San Martin, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Miguel A Valdovinos Díaz
- UNAM, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José M Remes Troche
- Institute of Medical Biological Research, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Mauricio Guzmán
- Neurogastroenterology Unit, Gastroenterology Service, Hospital San Martín de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Albis Hani
- Hospital San Ignacio-Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Hannah Pitanga Lukashok
- Digestive Motility Service, Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas-IECED, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | | | - Eduardo Vesco
- Neuromotility Unit, Clínica Angloamericana, Lima, Peru
- Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
| | - Mariel Mejia Rivas
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Service, Hospital Vivian Pellas, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - Luis F Pineda Ovalle
- Neurogastroenterology and Motility Service Motility Instituto Gut Médica, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, School of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Clínica Alemana, Vitacura, Chile
| | - Marcelo F Vela
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fernandes YR. Unraveling the Dynamics of Esophageal Motility, Esophagitis Severity, and Age in GERD Patients: A Cross-Sectional Exploration. Cureus 2024; 16:e53979. [PMID: 38468980 PMCID: PMC10927278 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by prolonged exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric content, with esophageal motility playing a pivotal role in its pathophysiology. This study employs a cross-sectional design to investigate the interplay between esophageal motility, the severity of esophagitis, and age in individuals presenting with GERD symptoms. OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to assess proximal and distal esophageal contractions in individuals with GERD symptoms, exploring potential correlations with the severity of esophageal lesions and age. METHODS A total of 47 patients reporting heartburn and acid regurgitation underwent diagnostic investigations, including esophageal manometry, radiological examinations, and endoscopy. Patients were categorized into groups based on the presence and severity of esophagitis. Esophageal contractions were monitored using a manometric method at various distances from the UES after swallowing 5 mL of water. RESULTS Patients with severe esophagitis (SE) exhibited a reduced distal esophageal contraction amplitude compared to those without esophagitis (WE) or with moderate esophagitis (ME). No significant age-related differences were observed in esophageal contractions. Analyses included contraction amplitude, duration, area under the curve (AUC), and propagation time. CONCLUSION This study provides insights into the nuanced relationship between esophageal motility, esophagitis severity, and age in GERD patients. The findings highlight the significance of distal esophageal contractions in SE cases, suggesting potential implications for disease progression. Age did not emerge as a significant factor influencing esophageal motility in this patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ygor R Fernandes
- General Surgery and Digestive Endoscopy, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Hospital São Paulo, São Paulo, BRA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davis TA, Gyawali CP. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 30:17-28. [PMID: 38173155 PMCID: PMC10774805 DOI: 10.5056/jnm23145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, with increasing worldwide disease prevalence and high economic burden. A significant number of patients will remain symptomatic following an empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial. Persistent symptoms despite PPI therapy are often mislabeled as refractory GERD. For patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD), testing is performed off antisecretory therapy to identify objective evidence of pathologic reflux using criteria outlined by the Lyon consensus. In proven GERD, differentiation between refractory symptoms (persisting symptoms despite optimized antisecretory therapy) and refractory GERD (abnormal reflux metrics on ambulatory pH impedance monitoring and/or persistent erosive esophagitis on endoscopy while on optimized PPI therapy) can direct subsequent management. While refractory symptoms may arise from esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn, proven refractory GERD requires personalization of the management approach, tapping from an array of non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. Proper diagnosis and management of refractory GERD is critical to mitigate undesirable long-term complications such as strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review outlines the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with refractory GERD symptoms, describes the distinction between unproven and proven GERD, and provides a comprehensive review of the current treatment strategies available for the management of refractory GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor A Davis
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut 2024; 73:361-371. [PMID: 37734911 PMCID: PMC10846564 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The Lyon Consensus provides conclusive criteria for and against the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and adjunctive metrics that consolidate or refute GERD diagnosis when primary criteria are borderline or inconclusive. An international core and working group was assembled to evaluate research since publication of the original Lyon Consensus, and to vote on statements collaboratively developed to update criteria. The Lyon Consensus 2.0 provides a modern definition of actionable GERD, where evidence from oesophageal testing supports revising, escalating or personalising GERD management for the symptomatic patient. Symptoms that have a high versus low likelihood of relationship to reflux episodes are described. Unproven versus proven GERD define diagnostic strategies and testing options. Patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD) are studied using prolonged wireless pH monitoring or catheter-based pH or pH-monitoring off antisecretory medication, while patients with conclusive GERD evidence (proven GERD) and persisting symptoms are evaluated using pH-impedance monitoring while on optimised antisecretory therapy. The major changes from the original Lyon Consensus criteria include establishment of Los Angeles grade B oesophagitis as conclusive GERD evidence, description of metrics and thresholds to be used with prolonged wireless pH monitoring, and inclusion of parameters useful in diagnosis of refractory GERD when testing is performed on antisecretory therapy in proven GERD. Criteria that have not performed well in the diagnosis of actionable GERD have been retired. Personalisation of investigation and management to each patient's unique presentation will optimise GERD diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California in San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Medicine/Section of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David Katzka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Stuart Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor Scott and White North Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mark R Fox
- Gastroenterology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Korea - Songsin Campus, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Digestive System Research Unit, Universidad del Desarrollo Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Las Condes, Chile
| | - Chien-Lin Chen
- Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Charles Cock
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Albis Hani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yan-sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Department of Digestive Physiology, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Valdovinos Díaz MA, Amieva-Balmori M, Carmona-Sánchez R, Coss-Adame E, Gómez-Escudero O, González-Martínez M, Huerta-Iga F, Morel-Cerda E, Remes-Troche JM, Tamayo-de la Cuesta JL, Torres-Villalobos G, Valdovinos-García LR, Vázquez-Elizondo G, Villar-Chávez AS, Arenas-Martínez JA. Good clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. An expert review from the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2024; 89:121-143. [PMID: 38580493 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very prevalent in the general population, with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, requiring accurate diagnosis and treatment. AIM The aim of this expert review is to establish good clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and personalized treatment of GERD. METHODS The good clinical practice recommendations were produced by a group of experts in GERD, members of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (AMG), after carrying out an extensive review of the published literature and discussing each recommendation at a face-to-face meeting. This document does not aim to be a clinical practice guideline with the methodology such a document requires. RESULTS Fifteen experts on GERD formulated 27 good clinical practice recommendations for recognizing the symptoms and complications of GERD, the rational use of diagnostic tests and medical treatment, the identification and management of refractory GERD, the overlap with functional disorders, endoscopic and surgical treatment, and GERD in the pregnant woman, older adult, and the obese patient. CONCLUSIONS An accurate diagnosis of GERD is currently possible, enabling the prescription of a personalized treatment in patients with this condition. The goal of the good clinical practice recommendations by the group of experts from the AMG presented in this document is to aid both the general practitioner and specialist in the process of accurate diagnosis and treatment, in the patient with GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Amieva-Balmori
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Intestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas de la Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - R Carmona-Sánchez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Práctica privada, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | - E Coss-Adame
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - O Gómez-Escudero
- Clínica de Gastroenterología, Endoscopia y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Endoneurogastro, Hospital Ángeles Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - M González-Martínez
- Departamento de Endoscopia, Hospital de Especialidades del CMN Siglo XXI IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - F Huerta-Iga
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ángeles Torreón, Torreón, Mexico
| | - E Morel-Cerda
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - J M Remes-Troche
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Intestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas de la Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - J L Tamayo-de la Cuesta
- Servicio de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
| | - G Torres-Villalobos
- Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - G Vázquez-Elizondo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas ONCARE, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - A S Villar-Chávez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ángeles Acoxpa, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J A Arenas-Martínez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tsukanov VV, Vasyutin AV, Tonkikh JL. Modern aspects of managing patients with non-erosive reflux disease. MEDITSINSKIY SOVET = MEDICAL COUNCIL 2023:28-33. [DOI: 10.21518/ms2023-218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
A review of current data on the management of patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) was made. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is based on symptom analysis, endoscopic evaluation of the esophageal mucosa, objective evidence of gastric contents reflux into the esophagus during pH-impedancemetry, and response to therapeutic intervention. Treatment for GERD should include weight loss if overweight, lifestyle modification, and dietary modification. Current consensus recommends starting NERD treatment with once-daily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but only 50% of patients with this pathology respond to such therapy. Incomplete response to PPIs is a reason to increase the dose of PPI and add Gaviscon to treatment to neutralize the post-prandial “acid pocket”. Gaviscon is especially effective in patients with postprandial or nocturnal symptoms and in those with hiatal hernia. The mechanism of action of Gaviscon is based on the formation of an alginate “raft” on the surface of the gastric contents, which neutralizes the acid and blocks its pathological effect to esophageal mucosa. A modern meta-analysis on the NERD treatment, which included 23 studies and 10,735 patients, showed the efficacy of Gaviscon monotherapy comparable to PPIs in treatment for 4 weeks. The combination of a PPI with Gaviscon offers the opportunity to optimize response to treatment in NERD patients with an incomplete response to PPIs monotherapy. The Russian Gastroenterological Association thinks that alginates can be used both as monotherapy for mild clinical variants of NERD and in complex treatment regimens for various GERD variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. V. Tsukanov
- Scientific Research Institute of Medical Problems of the North
| | - A. V. Vasyutin
- Scientific Research Institute of Medical Problems of the North
| | - Ju. L. Tonkikh
- Scientific Research Institute of Medical Problems of the North
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vakil N. Developments in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease over the Last 40 Years. Dig Dis 2023; 42:127-136. [PMID: 37778332 DOI: 10.1159/000533901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The last 40 years have seen a remarkable change in our understanding of reflux disease. SUMMARY These changes encompass disease definition and impact, pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, regulatory oversight of clinical trials, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic, and surgical treatment. We have also seen a number of promising therapies fail. KEY MESSAGES The future holds the promise of further advances. Adaptive artificial intelligence will take over diagnostics in manometry and pH impedance testing and patient-driven outcomes may be changed by interactions with artificial intelligence rather than humans. Changes in chip technology will allow higher resolution chips to be carried on smaller devices making extra-esophageal areas where reflux may play a role more accessible to prolonged observation and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimish Vakil
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shah ED, Chan WW, Jodorkovsky D, Lee Lynch K, Patel A, Patel D, Yadlapati R. Optimizing the Management Algorithm for Heartburn in General Gastroenterology: Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Minimization Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023:S1542-3565(23)00676-6. [PMID: 37683879 PMCID: PMC10918040 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Heartburn is the most common symptom seen in gastroenterology practice. We aimed to optimize cost-effective evaluation and management of heartburn. METHODS We developed a decision analytic model from insurer and patient perspectives comparing 4 strategies for patients failing empiric proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): (1) PPI optimization without testing, (2) endoscopy with PPI optimization for all patients, (3) endoscopy with PPI discontinuation when erosive findings are absent, and (4) endoscopy/ambulatory reflux monitoring with PPI discontinuation as appropriate for phenotypic management. Health outcomes were respectively defined on systematic reviews of clinical trials. Cost outcomes were defined on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services databases and commercial multipliers for direct healthcare costs, and national observational studies evaluating healthcare utilization. The time horizon was 1 year. All testing was performed off PPI. RESULTS PPI optimization without testing cost $3784/y to insurers and $3128 to patients due to lower work productivity and suboptimal symptom relief. Endoscopy with PPI optimization lowered insurer costs by $1020/y and added 11 healthy days/y by identifying erosive reflux disease. Endoscopy with PPI discontinuation added 11 additional healthy days/y by identifying patients without erosive reflux disease that did not need PPI. By optimizing phenotype-guided treatment, endoscopy/ambulatory reflux monitoring with a trial of PPI discontinuation was the most effective of all strategies (gaining 22 healthy days/y) and saved $2183 to insurers and $2396 to patients. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with heartburn, endoscopy with ambulatory reflux monitoring (off PPI) optimizes cost-effective management by matching treatment to phenotype. When erosive findings are absent, trialing PPI discontinuation is more cost-effective than optimizing PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Walter W Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniela Jodorkovsky
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Kristle Lee Lynch
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amit Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dhyanesh Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schuitenmaker JM, Kuipers T, Schijven MP, Smout AJPM, Fockens P, Bredenoord AJ. The effect of sleep positional therapy on nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux measured by esophageal pH-impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14614. [PMID: 37246930 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of an electronic positional therapy wearable device on nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux measured by pH-impedance reflux monitoring. METHODS We performed a single-center, prospective, interventional study in 30 patients with nocturnal reflux symptoms and a nocturnal esophageal acid exposure time (AET) ≥1.5% measured off acid-suppressive medication by ambulatory pH-impedance reflux monitoring. Patients were treated with an electronic positional therapy wearable device for 2 weeks. The device vibrates in the right lateral decubitus position so it conditions patients to avoid that sleep position. After 2 weeks treatment, the pH-impedance study was repeated. Primary outcome was the change in nocturnal AET. Secondary outcomes include change in number of reflux episodes and reflux symptoms. RESULTS Complete data were available for 27 patients (13 females, mean age 49.8 years). The median nocturnal AET decreased from 6.0% (IQR, 2.3-15.3) to 3.1% (0.1-10.8) after 2 weeks of treatment (p = 0.079). The number of reflux episodes was significantly reduced after 2 weeks of treatment (baseline: 8.0 (3.0-12.3) vs. end: 3.0 (1.0-8.0); p = 0.041). Treatment led to a statistically significant decrease in time spent in right lateral decubitus position (baseline: mean 36.9% ± 15.2% vs. end: 2.7% ± 8.2%; p = <0.001) and an increase in the left lateral decubitus position (baseline 29.2% ± 14.8% vs. end: 63.3% ± 21.9%; p = <0.001). Symptom improvement was reported by 70.4% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Sleep positional therapy using an electronic wearable device promotes sleeping in the left lateral decubitus position and improves reflux parameters measured by pH-impedance reflux monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen M Schuitenmaker
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies P Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André J P M Smout
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, University Medical Centers Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mari A, Marabotto E, Ribolsi M, Zingone F, Barberio B, Savarino V, Savarino EV. Encouraging appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors: existing initiatives and proposals for the future. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:913-923. [PMID: 37632213 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2252327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revolutionized the management of acid-related disorders, representing today the mainstay treatment of these conditions. However, despite their large range of indications and usefulness, the remarkable expansion of their use in the last two decades cannot be explained by the increasing prevalence of acid-related diseases only. An inappropriate prescription for clinical conditions in which the pathogenetic role of acid has not been documented has been described, with the natural consequence of increasing the costs and the potential risk of iatrogenic harm due to adverse events and complications recently emerged. AREAS COVERED In this review, we summarize current indications of PPIs administration, potential adverse events associated with their chronic utilization, and misuse of PPIs. Moreover, we describe existing and possible initiatives for improving the use of PPIs, and some proposals for the future. EXPERT OPINION PPI deprescribing is the preferred and most effective approach to reduce the use of PPIs, rather than adopting sharp discontinuation, probably due to fewer withdrawal symptoms. Nonetheless, large knowledge gaps still exist in clinical practice regarding the optimal approach of PPI deprescribing in various clinical scenarios. Further prospective well-designed international studies are eagerly warranted to improve our perspectives on controlling global PPI inappropriate use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Mari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Nazareth EMMS Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mentore Ribolsi
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, ItalyI
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, ItalyI
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, ItalyI
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ribolsi M, Savarino E. Towards a better diagnosis of gastro esophageal reflux disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:999-1010. [PMID: 37800858 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2267435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION GERD is a common disorder and is characterized by the presence of typical or atypical symptoms. In GERD patients, the presence of mucosal alterations in endoscopy is detected in up to 30% of individuals. The clinical presentation of GERD patients may be complex and their management is challenging, due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation. The present review has been performed searching all relevant articles in this field, over the past years, using PubMed database. AREAS COVERED The diagnosis and management of GERD have been significantly improved in the last years due to the increasing availability of reflux monitoring techniques and the implementation of new procedures in the therapeutic armamentarium. Beside traditional impedance-pH variables, new metrics have been developed, increasing the diagnostic yield of reflux monitoring and better predicting the treatment response. Traditional pharmacological treatments include acid-suppressive-therapy and/or anti-acid. On the other hand, surgical treatment and, more recently, endoscopic procedures represent a promising field in the therapeutic approach. EXPERT OPINION Diagnosis and treatment of GERD still represent a challenging area. However, we believe that an accurate upfront evaluation is, nowadays, necessary in addressing patients with GERD to a more accurate diagnosis as well as to the best treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Calabrese F, Poletti V, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Gentile C, Facciorusso A, Franchellucci G, De Marco A, Brandaleone L, Ofosu A, Samanta J, Ramai D, De Luca L, Al-Lehibi A, Zuliani W, Hassan C, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. New Perspectives in Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2057. [PMID: 37370952 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high incidence and prevalence in the general population. Clinical manifestations are heterogenous, and so is the response to medical treatment. Proton pump inhibitors are still the most common agents used to control reflux symptoms and for healing esophagitis, but they are not a one-size-fits-all solution for the disease. Patients with persistent troublesome symptoms despite medical therapy, those experiencing some adverse drug reaction, or those unwilling to take lifelong medications deserve valid alternatives. Anti-reflux Nissen fundoplication is an effective option, but the risk of adverse events has limited its spread. In recent years, advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have been made, and three major endoluminal alternatives are now available, including (1) the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the esophago-gastric junction, (2) transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and (3) anti-reflux mucosal interventions (ARMI) based on mucosal resection (ARMS) and mucosal ablation (ARMA) techniques to remodel the cardia. Endoscopic techniques have shown interesting results, but their diffusion is still limited to expert endoscopists in tertiary centers. This review discusses the state of the art in the endoscopic approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Valeria Poletti
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Carmine Gentile
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro De Marco
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Brandaleone
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Luca De Luca
- Endoscopic Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Abed Al-Lehibi
- King Fahad Medical City, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abduaziz University-Health Science, Riyadh 11525, Saudi Arabia
| | - Walter Zuliani
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Guilleminault L, Demoulin-Alexikova S, de Gabory L, Varannes SBD, Brouquières D, Balaguer M, Chapron A, Grassin-Delyle S, Poussel M, Guibert N, Reychler G, Trzepizur W, Woisard V, Crestani S. Guidelines for the management of chronic cough in adults. Endorsed by the French speaking society of respiratory diseases (Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française, SPLF), the Société Française d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et de Chirurgie de la Face et du Cou (SFORL), the Société Française de Phoniatrie et de Laryngologie (SFPL), the Société Nationale Française de Gastro-entérologie (SNFGE). Respir Med Res 2023; 83:101011. [PMID: 37087905 DOI: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Patients with chronic cough experience a high alteration of quality of life. Moreover, chronic cough is a complex entity with numerous etiologies and treatments. In order to help clinicians involved in the management of patients with chronic cough, guidelines on chronic cough have been established by a group of French experts. These guidelines address the definitions of chronic cough and the initial management of patients with chronic cough. We present herein second-line tests that might be considered in patients with cough persistence despite initial management. Experts also propose a definition of unexplained or refractory chronic cough (URCC) in order to better identify patients whose cough persists despite optimal management. Finally, these guidelines address the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions useful in URCC. Thus, amitryptilline, pregabalin, gabapentin or morphine combined with speech and/or physical therapy are a mainstay of treatment strategies in URCC. Other treatment options, such as P2 × 3 antagonists, are being developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Guilleminault
- Pôle des voies respiratoires, service de pneumo-allergologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, 24 chemin de pouvourville, 31059, Toulouse, France; Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Inserm U1291, University of Toulouse, CNRS U5282, 31000, Toulouse, France.
| | - Silvia Demoulin-Alexikova
- CHU de Lille, Lille, France Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille - Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Centre d'Infection et d'Immunité de Lille, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Ludovic de Gabory
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, 33000, France
| | - Stanislas Bruley Des Varannes
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD CIC 1413, Université de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Danielle Brouquières
- Pôle des voies respiratoires, service de pneumo-allergologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, 24 chemin de pouvourville, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Mathieu Balaguer
- Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Anthony Chapron
- Université de Rennes 1, CHU Rennes, Département de Médecine Générale, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Stanislas Grassin-Delyle
- Respiratory Diseases Department, Foch Hospital, 92150, Suresnes, France; Infection and Inflammation, Health Biotechnology Department, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, INSERM, 78180, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - Mathias Poussel
- CHRU-Nancy, Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire-Centre Universitaire de Médecine du Sport et Activités Physiques Adaptées, F54000, Nancy, France; DevAH, Université de Lorraine, F54000, Nancy, France
| | - Nicolas Guibert
- Pôle des voies respiratoires, service de pneumo-allergologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, 24 chemin de pouvourville, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Wojciech Trzepizur
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Angers University Hospital, INSERM 1083, UMR CNRS 6015, MITOVASC, Equipe CarME, SFR ICAT, University of Angers, 49000, Angers, France
| | - Virginie Woisard
- Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Sabine Crestani
- Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guilleminault L, Demoulin-Alexikova S, de Gabory L, Bruley des Varannes S, Brouquières D, Balaguer M, Chapron A, Grassin Delyle S, Poussel M, Guibert N, Reychler G, Trzepizur W, Woisard V, Crestani S. [Guidelines for the management of chronic cough in adults]. Rev Mal Respir 2023; 40:432-452. [PMID: 37080877 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Patients with chronic cough experience major alteration in their quality of life. Given its numerous etiologies and treatments, this disease is a complex entity. To help clinicians involved in patient management of patients, guidelines have been issued by a group of French experts. They address definitions of chronic cough and initial management of patients with this pathology. We present herein the second-line tests that might be considered in patients whose coughing has persisted, notwithstanding initial management. The experts have also put forward a definition of unexplained or refractory chronic cough (URCC), the objective being to more precisely identify those patients whose cough persists despite optimal management. Lastly, these guidelines indicate the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions of use in URCC. Amitriptyline, pregabalin, gabapentin or morphine combined with speech and/or physical therapy are mainstays in treatment strategies. Other treatment options, such as P2X3 antagonists, are being developed and have generated high hopes among physicians and patients alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Guilleminault
- Pôle des voies respiratoires, service de pneumo-allergologie, centre hospitalo-universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut toulousain des maladies infectieuses et inflammatoires (Infinity) INSERM UMR1291, CNRS UMR5051, université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
| | - S Demoulin-Alexikova
- CHU de Lille, Lille, France; Inserm, CNRS, U1019-UMR9017, service des explorations fonctionnelles respiratoires, centre d'infection et d'immunité de Lille (CIIL), Institut Pasteur de Lille, university Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - L de Gabory
- Department of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, university hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - S Bruley des Varannes
- IMAD CIC 1413, gastroenterology department, Institut des maladies de l'appareil digestif, université de Nantes, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - D Brouquières
- Pôle des voies respiratoires, service de pneumo-allergologie, centre hospitalo-universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - M Balaguer
- Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - A Chapron
- Département de médecine générale, université de Rennes 1, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - S Grassin Delyle
- Respiratory diseases department, Foch hospital, Suresnes, France; Inserm, UVSQ, infection and inflammation, health biotechnology department, Paris-Saclay university, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - M Poussel
- Exploration fonctionnelle respiratoire, centre universitaire de médecine du sport et activités physiques adaptées, CHRU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France; DevAH, université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - N Guibert
- Pôle des voies respiratoires, service de pneumo-allergologie, centre hospitalo-universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - G Reychler
- Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgique
| | - W Trzepizur
- Department of respiratory and sleep medicine, Angers university hospital, Angers, France; Inserm 1083, UMR CNRS 6015, MITOVASC, équipe CarME, SFR ICAT, university of Angers, 49000 Angers, France
| | - V Woisard
- Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - S Crestani
- Unité de voie et déglutition, hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ugliono E, Rebecchi F, Mantova S, Osella G, Mansour AMFMH, Morino M. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: long-term clinical outcomes. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01483-x. [PMID: 36862352 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01483-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Persistent symptoms despite adequate Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) treatment are described in up to 40% of patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). The efficacy of Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery (LARS) in PPI non-responder patients is still unclear. This observational study aims to report the long-term clinical outcomes and predictors of dissatisfaction in a cohort of refractory GERD patients submitted to LARS. Patients with preoperative refractory symptoms and objective GERD evidence submitted to LARS between 2008 and 2016 were included in the study. Primary endpoint was overall satisfaction with the procedure, secondary endpoints were long-term GERD symptom relief and endoscopic findings. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare satisfied and dissatisfied patients, in order to identify preoperative predictors of dissatisfaction. A total of 73 refractory GERD patients who underwent LARS were included in the study. At a mean follow-up of 91.2 ± 30.5 months, the satisfaction rate was 86.3%, with a statistically significant reduction in typical and atypical GERD symptoms. Causes of dissatisfaction were severe heartburn (6.8%), gas bloat syndrome (2.8%), and persistent dysphagia (4.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that a number of Total Distal Reflux Episodes (TDRE) > 75 was a predictive factor of long-term dissatisfaction after LARS while a partial response to PPI was a protective factor against dissatisfaction. LARS guarantees a high level of long-term satisfaction for selected refractory GERD patients. An abnormal TDRE at 24 h-multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and the lack of response to preoperative PPI were predictors of long-term dissatisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elettra Ugliono
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. .,Department of Mechanical and Aerospacial Engineering, Politecnico of Turin, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
| | - Fabrizio Rebecchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Mantova
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giulia Osella
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Ahmed Mohammed Farid Mahmoud Hamdy Mansour
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.,Department of Mechanical and Aerospacial Engineering, Politecnico of Turin, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Frazzoni M, Frazzoni L, Ribolsi M, Russo S, Conigliaro R, De Bortoli N, Savarino E. On-therapy impedance-pH monitoring can efficiently characterize PPI-refractory GERD and support treatment escalation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14547. [PMID: 36780512 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On-therapy impedance-pH monitoring is recommended in patients with documented GERD and PPI-refractory heartburn in order to establish whether the unremitting symptom is reflux-related or not. AIMS To define on-PPI cut-offs of impedance-pH metrics allowing proper interpretation of on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring. METHODS Blinded expert review of impedance-pH tracings performed during double-dosage PPI, prospectively collected from 150 GERD patients with PPI-refractory heartburn and 45 GERD patients with PPI-responsive heartburn but persisting extra-esophageal symptoms. Acid exposure time (AET), number of total refluxes (TRs), post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index, and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were assessed. On-PPI cut-offs were defined and evaluated with ROC analysis and the area under curve (AUC). RESULTS All the four impedance-pH metrics significantly differed between PPI-refractory and PPI-responsive heartburn cases. At ROC analysis, AUC was 0.73 for AET, 0.75 for TRs, 0.81 for PSPW index, and 0.71 for MNBI; best cut-offs were ≥1.7% for AET, ≥45 for TRs, ≤36% for PSPW index, and ≤ 1847 Ω for MNBI; AUC of such cut-offs was 0.66, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively. Analysis of PSPW index and MNBI added to assessment of AET and TRs significantly increased the yield of on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring in the PPI-refractory cohort (97% vs. 83%, p < 0.0001). Notably, suboptimal acid suppression as shown by AET ≥1.7% was detected in 43% of 150 PPI-refractory cases. CONCLUSIONS We have defined on-PPI cut-offs of impedance-pH metrics by which comprehensive assessment of impedance-pH tracings, including analysis of PSPW index and MNBI can efficiently characterize PPI-refractory GERD and support treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mentore Ribolsi
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Digestive Disease, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Salvatore Russo
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Rita Conigliaro
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Noh JH, Jung HY. Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 29:7-19. [PMID: 36606432 PMCID: PMC9837547 DOI: 10.5056/jnm22170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal motility disorders have a wide range of symptoms and affect patients' quality of life. With the advancement of endoscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopy in motility disorders is becoming more significant. Endoscopy is necessary to rule out possible organic diseases in patients with suspected motility disorders and provide significant clues for their diagnosis. Moreover, interventional endoscopy may be a primary or alternative treatment option for selected patients with motility disorders, and it is becoming a promising field as new therapeutic applications are developed and utilized for various motility disorders. This review may provide suitable indications for the use of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating motility disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Hee Noh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwoon-Yong Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Correspondence: Hwoon-Yong Jung, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea, Tel: +82-2-3010-3197, Fax: +82-2-476-0824, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ge Z, Wang B, Chang J, Yu Z, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Duan Z. Using deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence to assess the severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease according to the Los Angeles Classification System. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:596-604. [PMID: 36625026 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2163185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complex disease with a high worldwide prevalence. The Los Angeles classification (LA-grade) system is meaningful for assessing the endoscopic severity of GERD. Deep learning (DL) methods have been widely used in the field of endoscopy. However, few DL-assisted researches have concentrated on the diagnosis of GERD. This study is the first to develop a five-category classification DL model based on the LA-grade using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 2081 endoscopic images were used for the development of a DL model, and the classification accuracy of the models and endoscopists with different levels of experience was compared. RESULTS Some mainstream DL models were utilized, of which DenseNet-121 outperformed. The area under the curve (AUC) of the DenseNet-121 was 0.968, and its classification accuracy (86.7%) was significantly higher than that of junior (71.5%) and experienced (77.4%) endoscopists. An XAI evaluation was also performed to explore the perception consistency between the DL model and endoscopists, which showed meaningful results for real-world applications. CONCLUSIONS The DL model showed a potential in improving the accuracy of endoscopists in LA-grading of GERD, and it has noticeable clinical application prospects and is worthy of further promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyang Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Bowen Wang
- Science and Technology, Graduate School of Information, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jiuyang Chang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Zequn Yu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhenyuan Zhou
- Information Management Department, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Zhijun Duan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhang X, He S, Xu Z, Liu Y, Feng C, Tang S, Wu L, Liu T. The prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease ready for antireflux surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e31430. [PMID: 36397394 PMCID: PMC9666116 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000031430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronary atherosclerosis (CAS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) share common risk factors. The existing CAS may not only increase the possibility of GERD to be refractory GERD (RGERD), but also increase the risk of antireflux surgery for these patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CAS and its potential risk factors in patients with RGERD ready for antireflux surgery. The retrospective analysis was performed in the digestive disease center of Suining Central Hospital, a teritary hospital in Sichuan, China. Records of patients with RGERD admitted to the hospital for antireflux surgery between July 2018, and June 2021 were included. The included patients were divided into the RGERD group and RGERD-CAS group based on the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) results, which were defined as no CAS and CAS (<50% mild stenosis or ≥50% significant stenosis). In total, 448 patients with RGERD qualified for the study. The prevalence of CAS in these patients was 45.1%. Specifically, 246 patients (54.9%) were in the RGERD group, and 202 patients (45.1%) were in the RGERD-CAS group. Among these 202 patients with CAS, 120 patients (59.4%) had mild CAS (<50% stenosis), 82 patients (40.6%) had significant CAS (≥50% stenosis). Five independent risk factors, including male sex, high blood pressure (HBP), diabetes mellitus (DM), Barrett's esophagus (BE) and family history of coronary artery disease were identified for the occurrence of CAS in patients with RGERD ready for antireflux surgery after adjusting for other factors. CAS is prevalent in patients with RGERD ready for antireflux surgery. Routing CTTA was suggested to exclude potential coronary artery disease in RGERD patients ready for antireflux surgery with independent risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suyu He
- The Fourth Department of Digestive Disease Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
- *Correspondence: Suyu He, The Fourth Department of the Digestive Disease Center, Suining Central Hospital, Sichuan 629000, China (e-mail: )
| | | | - Yijun Liu
- The Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| | | | | | - Lili Wu
- Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Tianyu Liu
- The Endoscopy Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li Y, Duan Z. Updates in interaction of gastroesophageal reflux disease and extragastroesophageal digestive diseases. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:1053-1063. [PMID: 35860994 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2056018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the common chronic diseases with prevalence increasing in the last decades. Because of its prevalence and chronicity, GERD affects the quality of life and increases health-care costs. Gastroesophageal diseases leading to GERD have been thoroughly studied, while extragastroesophageal digestive diseases (EGEDDs) may coexist with GERD and affect the occurrence and persistence of GERD symptoms and therapeutic effect. AREAS COVERED In this review, we aim to summarize the EGEDDs correlated with GERD and explore the potential mechanisms of this interaction. EXPERT OPINION Individuals with troublesome GERD symptoms may have some common gastroesophageal etiologies, but EGEDDs may also overlap and impact on the progression of GERD, which are often ignored in clinic. The lesions in the small intestine, colon, and hepatobiliary tract as well as functional bowel disorders had positive or negative associations with GERD through potential mechanisms. These diseases aggravate GERD symptoms, increase the esophageal acid burden, cause esophageal hypersensitivity, and finally affect the response to therapy in GERD patients. Therefore, it is necessary to clear the interaction between GERD and EGEDDs and their mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanqiu Li
- Second Gastroenterology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhijun Duan
- Second Gastroenterology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Maev IV, Andreev DN, Kucheryavyy YA, Lobanova EG, Shefer DI. Efficacy of an esophageal mucosal protectant in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. MEDITSINSKIY SOVET = MEDICAL COUNCIL 2022:20-26. [DOI: 10.21518/2079-701x-2022-16-15-20-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most widespread gastrointestinal pathologies and the most common reason for seeking medical care at the level of a primary link of public health services in many countries around the world. The classic clinical presentations of GERD are heartburn, belching, and regurgitation (spitting up), but the overall spectrum of GERD symptoms is broader and more heterogeneous in scope, including extraesophageal symptoms. Clinical and/or endoscopic refractoriness of some patients to the standard proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy remains a global challenge in the management of patients with GERD at the current stage of clinical medicine development. A medicinal product of a fundamentally new class was developed to optimize the treatment of patients with GERD – an esophageal mucosal protectant, which consists of a fixed combination of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate dissolved in a bioadhesive carrier (polymerase 407). This review is primarily aimed at systematizing data on the efficacy of the esophageal mucosal protectant in the treatment of patients with GERD. The systematic review that summarized the results of 10 studies involving 1090 patients with GERD showed that adding this esophageal mucosal protectant to the PPI therapy increased the efficacy of GERD therapy, as well as improved the frequency of symptomatic, endoscopic and morphological response to the treatment. Such combination therapy contributes to the optimization of the treatment of patients with various disease phenotypes, regress of both esophageal and extraesophageal symptoms, and potentiation of repair of the esophageal mucosa. To increase the efficacy of treatment and improve the prognosis of the disease, this approach should be implemented at the early stages of therapy in real clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. V. Maev
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | - D. N. Andreev
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | | | - E. G. Lobanova
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| | - D. I. Shefer
- Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Armstrong D, Hungin AP, Kahrilas PJ, Sifrim D, Sinclair P, Vaezi MF, Sharma P. Knowledge gaps in the management of refractory reflux-like symptoms: Healthcare provider survey. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14387. [PMID: 35502888 PMCID: PMC9787909 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory reflux-like symptoms have a substantial impact on patients and healthcare providers. The aim of the survey was to qualitatively assess the needs and attitudes of practicing clinicians around the management of refractory reflux symptoms and refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). METHODS An International Working Group for the Classification of Oesophagitis (IWGCO) steering committee invited clinicians to complete an online survey including 17 questions. KEY RESULTS Of the 113 clinicians who completed the survey, 70% were GIs, 20% were primary care physicians, and 10% were other specialties. Functional heartburn was considered the most common reason for an incomplete response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (82%), followed by stress/anxiety (69%). More GIs identified esophageal hypersensitivity as a cause, while more non-GIs identified esophageal dysmotility and non-reflux-related esophageal conditions. As the first step, most clinicians would order investigations (70-88%). Overall, 72% would add supplemental therapy for patients with partial response, but only 58% for those with non-response. Antacid/alginate was the most common choice overall, while non-GIs were more likely to add a prokinetic than were GIs (47.8 vs. 24.1%). Approximately 40% of clinicians would switch PPIs in patients with partial response, but only 29% would do so in non-responders. Preferences for long-term therapy were highly variable. The most common initial investigation was upper endoscopy. Choice of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring was more variable, with no clear preference for whether pH monitoring should be conducted on, or off, PPI therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES The survey identified a number of challenges for clinicians, especially non-GI physicians, treating patients with refractory reflux-like symptoms or rGERD on a daily basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Armstrong
- Division of Gastroenterology & Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Amrit Pali Hungin
- Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Peter J. Kahrilas
- Division of GastroenterologyNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary, University of LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Michael F. Vaezi
- Division of GastroenterologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyVeterans Affairs Medical CenterUniversity of Kansas School of MedicineKansas CityMissouriUSA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie Fass
- From the Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical Center, and Case Western Reserve University - both in Cleveland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Qi M, Zhou Y, Zhou YX, Fang SQ. Progress in research of pathogenesis of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022; 30:769-774. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v30.i17.769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) is a common clinical disease with many pathogenic factors, complex mechanisms, and increasing incidence. At present, scholars believe that the pathogenesis of rGERD is closely related to intra- and extra-esophageal factors. Elucidating the mechanism of rGERD can contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This paper summarizes the current progress in the research of the pathogenesis of rGERD, and puts forward our own thoughts and prospects for the disease, in order to provide ideas for the in-depth study of the pathogenesis of rGERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Qi
- Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Yu-Xuan Zhou
- Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Sheng-Quan Fang
- Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kamal AN, Dhar SI, Bock JM, Clarke JO, Lechien JR, Allen J, Belafsky PC, Blumin JH, Chan WW, Fass R, Fisichella PM, Marohn M, O'Rourke AK, Postma G, Savarino EV, Vaezi MF, Carroll TL, Akst LM. Best Practices in Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Multidisciplinary Modified Delphi Study. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 68:1125-1138. [PMID: 35995882 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07672-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common otolaryngologic diagnosis. Treatment of presumed LPR remains challenging, and limited frameworks exist to guide treatment. METHODS Using RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Methods, a modified Delphi approach identified consensus statements to guide LPR treatment. Experts independently and blindly scored proposed statements on importance, scientific acceptability, usability, and feasibility in a four-round iterative process. Accepted measures reached scores with ≥ 80% agreement in the 7-9 range (on a 9-point Likert scale) across all four categories. RESULTS Fifteen experts rated 36 proposed initial statements. In round one, 10 (27.8%) statements were rated as valid. In round two, 8 statements were modified based on panel suggestions, and experts subsequently rated 5 of these statements as valid. Round three's discussion refined statements not yet accepted, and in round four, additional voting identified 2 additional statements as valid. In total, 17 (47.2%) best practice statements reached consensus, touching on topics as varied as role of empiric treatment, medication use, lifestyle modifications, and indications for laryngoscopy. CONCLUSION Using a well-tested methodology, best practice statements in the treatment of LPR were identified. The statements serve to guide physicians on LPR treatment considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afrin N Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.
| | - Shumon I Dhar
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan M Bock
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - John O Clarke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, Elsan Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jacqueline Allen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter C Belafsky
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Joel H Blumin
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Walter W Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Michael Marohn
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashli K O'Rourke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Gregory Postma
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Thomas L Carroll
- Division of Otolaryngology and Harvard Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lee M Akst
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vaezi MF, Brunton S, Mark Fendrick A, Howden CW, Atkinson C, Pelletier C, Jacob R, Spechler SJ. Patient journey in erosive oesophagitis: real-world perspectives from US physicians and patients. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2022; 9:bmjgast-2022-000941. [PMID: 35868653 PMCID: PMC9316025 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-000941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Management of erosive oesophagitis (EE) remains suboptimal, with many patients experiencing incomplete healing, ongoing symptoms, and relapse despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The Study of Acid-Related Disorders investigated patient burden of individuals with EE in a real-world setting. Design US gastroenterologists (GIs) or family physicians (FPs)/general practitioners (GPs) treating patients with EE completed a physician survey and enrolled up to four patients with EE for a patient survey, with prespecified data extracted from medical records. Results 102 GIs and 149 FPs/GPs completed the survey; data were available for 73 patients (mean age at diagnosis, 45.4 years). Omeprazole was healthcare professional (HCP)-preferred first-line treatment (60.8% GIs; 56.4% FPs/GPs), and pantoprazole preferred second line (29.4% and 32.9%, respectively). Price and insurance coverage (both 55.5% HCPs) and familiarity (47.9%) key drivers for omeprazole; insurance coverage (52.0%), price (50.0%), familiarity (48.0%), initial symptom relief (46.0%), and safety (44.0%) key drivers for pantoprazole. Only 49.3% patients took medication as instructed all the time; 56.8% independently increased medication frequency some of the time. Despite treatment, 57.5% patients experienced heartburn and 30.1% regurgitation; heartburn was the most bothersome symptom. 58.9% patients believed that their symptoms could be better controlled; only 28.3% HCPs were very satisfied with current treatment options. 83.6% patients wanted long-lasting treatment options. Fast symptom relief for patients was a top priority for 66.1% HCPs, while 56.6% would welcome alternatives to PPIs. Conclusion This real-world multicentre study highlights the need for new, rapidly acting treatments in EE that reduce symptom burden, offer durable healing and provide symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Vaezi
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - A Mark Fendrick
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rinu Jacob
- Phathom Pharmaceuticals, New Jersey, New Jersey, USA
| | - Stuart J Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hungin APS, Scarpignato C, Keefer L, Corsetti M, Anastasiou F, Muris JWM, Mendive JM, Kahrilas PJ. Review article: rethinking the "ladder" approach to reflux-like symptom management in the era of PPI "resistance" - a multidisciplinary perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:1492-1500. [PMID: 35460095 PMCID: PMC9324949 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite widespread adoption of potent acid suppression treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for reflux-like symptoms, persistent symptoms are commonly reported in primary care and community studies. AIMS This multidisciplinary review critically evaluates how the management of reflux-like symptoms could better reflect their multifactorial pathophysiology. METHODS A panel of experts (from general practice, gastroenterology and gastropsychology) attended a series of workshops to review current management and propose a framework for the provision of more individualised care. RESULTS It was agreed that the perceptual (as well as the physiological) causes of reflux-like symptoms should be considered at the start of management, not as a last resort when all else has failed. A short course of PPI is a pragmatic approach to address reflux-like symptoms, but equally important is counselling about the gut-brain axis and provision of symptom-specific behavioural interventions for those who show signs of somatisation, hypervigilance or co-existing disorders of gut-brain interaction. Other low-harm interventions such as lifestyle and dietary advice, should also be better integrated into care at an early stage. Multidisciplinary care management programmes (including dietary, weight loss, exercise and behavioural intervention) should be developed to promote greater self-management and take advantage of the general shift toward the use of remotely accessed health care resources. CONCLUSIONS Management of reflux-like symptoms should be adapted to reflect the advances in knowledge about the multifactorial aetiology of these symptoms, addressing both acid-related and behavioural components early in management. The time has come to treat the patient, not the "disease".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Pali S. Hungin
- Primary Care and General Practice, Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | | | - Laurie Keefer
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew York CityNew YorkUSA
| | - Maura Corsetti
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNottinghamUK,School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Translational Medical Science – Nottingham Digestive Diseases CentreUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Foteini Anastasiou
- 4th Local Primary Care TeamMunicipality Practice and Academic Practice of HeraklionCreteGreece
| | - Jean W. M. Muris
- Department of Family MedicineCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Juan M. Mendive
- La Mina Primary Care Academic Centre, Catalan Health InstituteUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Peter J. Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Frazzoni M, Frazzoni L, Ribolsi M, Bortoli ND, Tolone S, Russo S, Conigliaro R, Penagini R, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Savarino E. Applying Lyon Consensus criteria in the work-up of patients with proton pump inhibitory-refractory heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:1423-1430. [PMID: 35229321 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A hierarchical approach for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis by impedance-pH monitoring was proposed by the Lyon Consensus, based on acid exposure time (AET) and supportive impedance metrics. AIMS To establish the clinical value of Lyon Consensus criteria in the work-up of patients with proton pump inhibitory (PPI)-refractory heartburn. METHODS Expert review of off-therapy impedance-pH tracings from unproven GERD patients with PPI-refractory heartburn prospectively evaluated at referral centers. Impedance metrics, namely total reflux episodes, postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index, and mean nocturnal baseline impedance, were assessed. Expert review of on-therapy preoperative impedance-pH tracings from a separate cohort of surgically treated erosive/nonerosive GERD cases. RESULTS Off-therapy, normal, inconclusive, and abnormal AET was found in 59%, 17%, and 23% of 317 cases. Supportive evidence of GERD was provided by abnormal impedance metrics in up to 22% and 62% of cases in the normal and inconclusive AET groups, respectively. Adding the cases with inconclusive AET and abnormal impedance metrics to the abnormal AET group, a significant increase in GERD evidence was observed (from 23% to 37% of cases, p < 0.0002). At the on-therapy presurgical evaluation, abnormal/inconclusive AET and supraphysiological values of impedance metrics showed ongoing reflux in 21% and 90% of 96 cases, respectively (p < 0.00001); a relationship between on-therapy ongoing reflux and PPI-refractory heartburn was confirmed by the favorable surgical outcome at 3-year follow-up, 88% of cases being in persistent off-PPI heartburn remission. CONCLUSIONS Impedance-pH monitoring, off- and on-therapy, is of high clinical value in the work-up of patients with PPI-refractory heartburn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mentore Ribolsi
- Digestive Disease, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma Facoltà Dipartimentale di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Tolone
- General and Bariatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Caserta, Italy
| | - Salvatore Russo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Rita Conigliaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua School of Medicine and Surgery, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kee PS, Maggo SDS, Kennedy MA, Barclay ML, Miller AL, Lehnert K, Curtis MA, Faull RLM, Parker R, Chin PKL. Omeprazole Treatment Failure in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Genetic Variation at the CYP2C Locus. Front Genet 2022; 13:869160. [PMID: 35664313 PMCID: PMC9160307 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.869160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Omeprazole is extensively used to manage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is primarily metabolized by CYP2C19. The CYP2C19*17 (rs12248560) allele and the recently described CYP2C:TG haplotype (rs11188059 and rs2860840) are associated with increased enzymatic activity, and may reduce omeprazole exposure. This observational study aimed to investigate the association between these genetic variants and omeprazole treatment failure in GERD. We recruited predominantly New Zealand European GERD patients who either did not respond to omeprazole or experienced breakthrough heartburn symptoms despite at least 8 weeks of omeprazole (≥40 mg/day). The GerdQ score was used to gauge symptomatic severity. A total of 55 cases were recruited with a median age (range) of 56 years (19–82) and GerdQ score of 11 (5–17). Of these, 19 (34.5%) were CYP2C19*17 heterozygotes and two (3.6%) were CYP2C19*17 homozygotes. A total of 30 (27.3%) CYP2C:TG haplotypes was identified in our cohort, with seven (12.7%) CYP2C:TG homozygotes, and 16 (29%) CYP2C:TG heterozygotes. No significant differences were observed for overall CYP2C19*17 alleles, CYP2C19*17/*17, overall CYP2C:TG haplotypes, and CYP2C:TG heterozygotes (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Gastroscopy and 24-h esophageal pH/impedance tests demonstrated objective evidence of GERD in a subgroup of 39 (71%) cases, in which the CYP2C:TG/TG was significantly enriched (p = 0.03) when compared with the haplotype frequencies in a predominantly (91%) New Zealand European reference population, but not the CYP2C19*17/*17 (p > 0.99), when compared with the allele frequencies for the non-Finnish European subset of gnomAD. We conclude that omeprazole treatment failure in GERD is associated with CYP2C:TG/TG, but not CYP2C19*17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Siu Kee
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Simran D. S. Maggo
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Martin A. Kennedy
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Murray L. Barclay
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Allison L. Miller
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Klaus Lehnert
- Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Maurice A. Curtis
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard L. M. Faull
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Remai Parker
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Paul K. L. Chin
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
- *Correspondence: Paul K. L. Chin,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tsukanov VV, Cherepnin MA, Vasyutin AV, Tonkikh JL, Kasparov EV, Maslennikova NA, Pavlova NV. Efficacy of rabeprazole (Razo®) in the treatment of various clinical variants of GERD: results from the GERBERA study. MEDITSINSKIY SOVET = MEDICAL COUNCIL 2022:28-35. [DOI: 10.21518/2079-701x-2022-16-7-28-35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
Introduction. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is extremely common in the structure of gastroenterological diseases. Aim. To conduct a prospective observational post-marketing study of rabeprazole (Razo®) 20 mg taking once daily in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) after 2 and 4 weeks of therapy and esophagitis stage A and B after 4 weeks of therapy (GERBERA).Materials and methods. 75 patients with GERD were included in the study (36 men and 39 women, mean age 41.7 ± 1.5 years). Clinical examination with the completion of standard questionnaires, assessment of the quality of life of patients were performed at three visits: before the start of the treatment, after 2 and 4 weeks of therapy. Fibroesophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in all patients before treatment and in patients with esophagitis after 4 weeks of therapy. All patients received rabeprazole (Razo®) at a dose of 20 mg once a day for the treatment of GERD. The diagnosis of heartburn and sour eructation was carried out according to the recommendations of the Montreal Consensus, the diagnosis of esophagitis was performed based on the Los Angeles classification.Results and discussion. Among patients with NERD, 74.1% of patients responded to Razo® therapy after 2 weeks of treatment, after 4 weeks the proportion of responders increased to 94.4% (p = 0.008). Healing of erosions after 4 weeks was observed in 90.5% of patients with esophagitis. Razo® therapy was accompanied by a pronounced improvement in GERD patients in all parameters of quality of life and patient satisfaction with the results of Razo® treatment.Conclusion. Based on the results of our study, we obtained high efficacy of Razo® at a dose of 20 mg once a day for the treatment of patients with NERD and erosive esophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. V. Tsukanov
- Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Separate Subdivision “Scientific Research Institute of medical problems of the North”
| | - M. A. Cherepnin
- Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Separate Subdivision “Scientific Research Institute of medical problems of the North”
| | - A. V. Vasyutin
- Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Separate Subdivision “Scientific Research Institute of medical problems of the North”
| | - J. L. Tonkikh
- Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Separate Subdivision “Scientific Research Institute of medical problems of the North”
| | - E. V. Kasparov
- Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center” of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Separate Subdivision “Scientific Research Institute of medical problems of the North”
| | - N. A. Maslennikova
- Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP, Pandolfino JE. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:984-994.e1. [PMID: 35123084 PMCID: PMC9838103 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS As many as one-half of all patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not derive benefit from acid suppression. This review outlines a personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approach to GERD symptoms. METHODS The Best Practice Advice statements presented here were developed from expert review of existing literature combined with extensive discussion and expert opinion to provide practical advice. Formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendations was not the intent of this clinical practice update. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should develop a care plan for investigation of symptoms suggestive of GERD, selection of therapy (with explanation of potential risks and benefits), and long-term management, including possible de-escalation, in a shared-decision making model with the patient. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should provide standardized educational material on GERD mechanisms, weight management, lifestyle and dietary behaviors, relaxation strategies, and awareness about the brain-gut axis relationship to patients with reflux symptoms. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should emphasize safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should provide patients presenting with troublesome heartburn, regurgitation, and/or non-cardiac chest pain without alarm symptoms a 4- to 8-week trial of single-dose PPI therapy. With inadequate response, dosing can be increased to twice a day or switched to a more effective acid suppressive agent once a day. When there is adequate response, PPI should be tapered to the lowest effective dose. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: If PPI therapy is continued in a patient with unproven GERD, clinicians should evaluate the appropriateness and dosing within 12 months after initiation, and offer endoscopy with prolonged wireless reflux monitoring off PPI therapy to establish appropriateness of long-term PPI therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: If troublesome heartburn, regurgitation, and/or non-cardiac chest pain do not respond adequately to a PPI trial or when alarm symptoms exist, clinicians should investigate with endoscopy and, in the absence of erosive reflux disease (Los Angeles B or greater) or long-segment (≥3 cm) Barrett's esophagus, perform prolonged wireless pH monitoring off medication (96-hour preferred if available) to confirm and phenotype GERD or to rule out GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Complete endoscopic evaluation of GERD symptoms includes inspection for erosive esophagitis (graded according to the Los Angeles classification when present), diaphragmatic hiatus (Hill grade of flap valve), axial hiatus hernia length, and inspection for Barrett's esophagus (graded according to the Prague classification and biopsied when present). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Clinicians should perform upfront objective reflux testing off medication (rather than an empiric PPI trial) in patients with isolated extra-esophageal symptoms and suspicion for reflux etiology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: In symptomatic patients with proven GERD, clinicians should consider ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring on PPI as an option to determine the mechanism of persisting esophageal symptoms despite therapy (if adequate expertise exists for interpretation). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Clinicians should personalize adjunctive pharmacotherapy to the GERD phenotype, in contrast to empiric use of these agents. Adjunctive agents include alginate antacids for breakthrough symptoms, nighttime H2 receptor antagonists for nocturnal symptoms, baclofen for regurgitation or belch predominant symptoms, and prokinetics for coexistent gastroparesis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Clinicians should provide pharmacologic neuromodulation, and/or referral to a behavioral therapist for hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, diaphragmatic breathing, and relaxation strategies in patients with functional heartburn or reflux disease associated with esophageal hypervigilance reflux hypersensitivity and/or behavioral disorders. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: In patients with proven GERD, laparoscopic fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation are effective surgical options, and transoral incisionless fundoplication is an effective endoscopic option in carefully selected patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: In patients with proven GERD, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is an effective primary anti-reflux intervention in obese patients, and a salvage option in non-obese patients, whereas sleeve gastrectomy has potential to worsen GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Candidacy for invasive anti-reflux procedures includes confirmatory evidence of pathologic GERD, exclusion of achalasia, and assessment of esophageal peristaltic function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - C. Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - John E. Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
The Effect of Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulphate-Based Medical Device Combined with Acid Suppression in the Treatment of Atypical Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071890. [PMID: 35407497 PMCID: PMC9000081 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Extraesophageal reflux symptoms are increasingly common in the Western population and their clinical management is still controversial. Although therapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the gold standard, to date, many patients are refractory to this treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in patients with a recent diagnosis of GERD experiencing extraesophageal symptoms, the efficacy and safety of a 6-week treatment with PPI acid suppression in combination with Gerdoff® (a hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate-based medical device) compared to PPI monotherapy. The trial verified the reduction in symptom frequency and severity by evaluating the proportion of Responders and Non-Responder patients after 6 weeks of treatment, compared to baseline. The effects of Gerdoff® + PPI treatment on extraesophageal symptoms were also evaluated after a 12-week follow up only in Responder patients. The analysis of the change in total Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI) score from baseline to the other time points showed that the extent of the decrease from baseline was higher in the Gerdoff® + PPI group than in the PPI group at any time point. However, the comparison between groups did not show statistically significant differences at any time point. A statistically significant difference, in favor of the Gerdoff® + PPI group, was observed for individual RSI items. Even if the trial showed some limitations, this is the first published study on the efficacy of a medical device containing hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate with antacid in the treatment of extraesophageal reflux symptoms.
Collapse
|
43
|
Krause AJ, Walsh EH, Weissbrod PA, Taft TH, Yadlapati R. An update on current treatment strategies for laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2021; 1510:5-17. [PMID: 34921412 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a syndrome caused by reflux of gastric contents into the pharynx or larynx, which leads to symptoms of throat clearing, hoarseness, pain, globus sensation, cough, excess mucus production in the throat, and dysphonia. LPR is a challenging condition, as there is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or treatment, and thus this presents a burden to the healthcare system. Strategies for treatment of LPR are numerous. Medical therapies include proton pump inhibitors, which are first line, H2 receptor antagonists, alginates, and baclofen. Other noninvasive treatment options include lifestyle therapy and the external upper esophageal sphincter compression device. Endoscopic and surgical options include antireflux surgery, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and transoral incisionless fundoplication. Functional laryngeal disorders and laryngeal hypersensitivity can present as LPR symptoms with or without gastroesophageal reflux disease. Though there are minimal studies in this area, neuromodulators and behavioral interventions are potential treatment options. Given the complexity of these patients and numerous available treatment options, we propose a treatment algorithm to help clinicians diagnose and triage patients into an appropriate therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Krause
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Erin H Walsh
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Philip A Weissbrod
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Tiffany H Taft
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bhardwaj R, Knotts R, Khan A. Functional Chest Pain and Esophageal Hypersensitivity: A Clinical Approach. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2021; 50:843-857. [PMID: 34717874 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Functional chest pain, functional heartburn, and reflux hypersensitivity are 3 functional esophageal disorders defined by the Rome IV criteria. Specific criteria, combining symptoms and the results of objective testing, allow for an accurate diagnosis of these conditions. Management may include medications targeted at optimizing acid suppression or neuromodulation, as well as a host of complementary or alternative treatment options. Psychological and behavioral interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and hypnotherapy, have displayed substantial benefits in the treatment of functional chest pain and functional heartburn. Acid suppression and focused neuromodulation are key evidence-based treatment options for reflux hypersensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Bhardwaj
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 East 77th Street, New York, NY 10075, USA
| | - Rita Knotts
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Abraham Khan
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rettura F, Bronzini F, Campigotto M, Lambiase C, Pancetti A, Berti G, Marchi S, de Bortoli N, Zerbib F, Savarino E, Bellini M. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:765061. [PMID: 34790683 PMCID: PMC8591082 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequent gastrointestinal disorders. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in healing lesions and improving symptoms in most cases, although up to 40% of GERD patients do not respond adequately to PPI therapy. Refractory GERD (rGERD) is one of the most challenging problems, given its impact on the quality of life and consumption of health care resources. The definition of rGERD is a controversial topic as it has not been unequivocally established. Indeed, some patients unresponsive to PPIs who experience symptoms potentially related to GERD may not have GERD; in this case the definition could be replaced with “reflux-like PPI-refractory symptoms.” Patients with persistent reflux-like symptoms should undergo a diagnostic workup aimed at finding objective evidence of GERD through endoscopic and pH-impedance investigations. The management strategies regarding rGERD, apart from a careful check of patient's compliance with PPIs, a possible change in the timing of their administration and the choice of a PPI with a different metabolic pathway, include other pharmacologic treatments. These include histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), alginates, antacids and mucosal protective agents, potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs), prokinetics, gamma aminobutyric acid-B (GABA-B) receptor agonists and metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 (mGluR5) antagonists, and pain modulators. If there is no benefit from medical therapy, but there is objective evidence of GERD, invasive antireflux options should be evaluated after having carefully explained the risks and benefits to the patient. The most widely performed invasive antireflux option remains laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), even if other, less invasive, interventions have been suggested in the last few decades, including endoscopic transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX) or radiofrequency therapy (Stretta). Due to the different mechanisms underlying rGERD, the most effective strategy can vary, and it should be tailored to each patient. The aim of this paper is to review the different management options available to successfully deal with rGERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Rettura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Bronzini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Michele Campigotto
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Christian Lambiase
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pancetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ginevra Berti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Santino Marchi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gyawali CP, Tutuian R, Zerbib F, Rogers BD, Frazzoni M, Roman S, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, Vela MF, Sifrim D. Value of pH Impedance Monitoring While on Twice-Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy to Identify Need for Escalation of Reflux Management. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1412-1422. [PMID: 34270955 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Acid exposure time (AET) and reflux episode thresholds from the Lyon Consensus may not apply for pH impedance studies performed while on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. We aimed to determine metrics from "on PPI" pH impedance studies predicting need for escalation of therapy. METHODS De-identified pH impedance studies performed while on twice-daily PPI (Diversatek, Boulder, CO) in healthy volunteers (n = 66, median age 37.5 years, 43.9% female), and patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (European heartburn-predominant cohort: n = 43, median age 57.0 years, 55.8% female; North American regurgitation-predominant cohort: n = 42, median age 41.6 years, 42.9% female) were analyzed. Median values and interquartile ranges for pH impedance metrics in healthy volunteers were compared with proven GERD patients with and without 50% symptom improvement on validated measures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified optimal thresholds predicting symptom response. RESULTS Both conventional and novel reflux metrics were similar between PPI responders and nonresponders (P ≥ .1 for each) despite differences from healthy volunteers. Combinations of metrics associated with conclusively abnormal reflux burden (AET >4%, >80 reflux episodes) were seen in 32.6% and 40.5% of heartburn and regurgitation-predominant patients, respectively, 57.1% and 82.4% of whom reported nonresponse; and 85% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. On ROC analysis, AET threshold of 0.5% modestly predicted nonresponse (sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.51; P = .22), and 40 reflux episodes had better performance characteristics (sensitivity, 0.80; specificity, 0.51; P = .002); 79% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. CONCLUSION Combinations of abnormal "on PPI" pH impedance metrics are associated with PPI nonresponse in proven GERD patients, and can be targeted for treatment escalation, including surgery, particularly in regurgitation-predominant GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| | - Radu Tutuian
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Clinics for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Benjamin D Rogers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Department of Specialized Medicine, Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; Laboratory of Therapeutic Applications of Ultrasound, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1032, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marcelo F Vela
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rodríguez de Santiago E, Albéniz E, Estremera-Arevalo F, Teruel Sanchez-Vegazo C, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:6601-6614. [PMID: 34754155 PMCID: PMC8554403 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i39.6601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease has an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. A significant proportion of patients have a suboptimal response to proton pump inhibitors or are unwilling to take lifelong medication due to concerns about long-term adverse effects. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapies offer a minimally invasive option for patients unwilling to undergo surgical treatment or take lifelong medication. The best candidates are those with a good response to proton pump inhibitors and without a significant sliding hiatal hernia. Transoral incisionless fundoplication and nonablative radiofrequency are the techniques with the largest body of evidence and that have been tested in several randomized clinical trials. Band-assisted ligation techniques, anti-reflux mucosectomy, anti-reflux mucosal ablation, and new plication devices have yielded promising results in recent noncontrolled studies. Nonetheless, the role of endoscopic procedures remains controversial due to limited long-term and comparative data, and no consensus exists in current clinical guidelines. This review provides an updated summary focused on the patient selection, technical details, clinical success, and safety of current and future endoscopic anti-reflux techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center. Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fermin Estremera-Arevalo
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center. Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carlos Teruel Sanchez-Vegazo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia 46026, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rivière P, Vauquelin B, Rolland E, Melchior C, Roman S, Bruley des Varannes S, Mion F, Gourcerol G, Sacher-Huvelin S, Zerbib F. Low FODMAPs diet or usual dietary advice for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: An open-labeled randomized trial. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14181. [PMID: 34051134 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The low FODMAPs (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet improves lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients suffering from proton pump inhibitor (PPI) refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have limited treatment options. We investigated the efficacy of a low FODMAPs diet in patients with PPI refractory GERD. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy of a 4-week low FODMAPs diet and usual dietary advice (ie, low-fat diet and head of bed elevation) in patients with symptomatic PPI refractory GERD, defined by a Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score >3 and abnormal pH-impedance monitoring on PPIs. The primary endpoint was the percentage of responders (RDQ ≤3) at the end of the diet. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (55% women, median age 45 years) were included, 16 randomized in the low FODMAPs diet group and 15 in the usual dietary advice group. Adherence to the assigned diet was good, with a significant difference in the FODMAPs intake per day between the low FODMAPs diet (2.5 g) and the usual dietary advice group (13 g) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in response rates (RDQ score ≤3) between the low FODMAPs diet (6/16, 37.5%) and usual dietary advice (3/15, 20%) groups (p = 0.43). Total RDQ score and dyspepsia subscore decreased significantly over time in both groups (p = 0.002), with no difference according to the assigned diet group (p = 0.85). CONCLUSION Low FODMAPs diet and usual dietary advice have similar but limited beneficial effects on symptoms in patients with PPI refractory GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Rivière
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Blandine Vauquelin
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emiliane Rolland
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Chloé Melchior
- Gastroenterology Department and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France.,INSERM UMR 1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, Rouen, France
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD CIC 1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - François Mion
- Digestive Physiology, Hopital E Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Gourcerol
- INSERM UMR 1073, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Normandy University, Rouen, France.,Physiology Department and INSERM CIC-CRB 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France
| | - Sylvie Sacher-Huvelin
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Nantes, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD CIC 1413, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Moudgal R, Schultz AW, Shah ED. Systemic Disease Associations with Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction and Gastrointestinal Transit: A Review. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14:249-257. [PMID: 34135613 PMCID: PMC8197439 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s283685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) are now classified within the Rome IV framework as disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Disorders of gastrointestinal transit (as defined by abnormalities on contemporary gastrointestinal motility testing) frequently are associated with symptoms that are also characteristic of DGBIs. In this narrative review, we outline a non-inclusive set of systemic diseases or risk factors that have been classically associated with DGBIs and disorders of gastrointestinal transit; these include diabetes mellitus, paraneoplastic syndromes, surgery, Parkinson's disease, systemic sclerosis, endocrinopathies, polypharmacy, and post-infectious syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohitha Moudgal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Andrew W Schultz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Eric D Shah
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-HitchcockHealth,One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|