Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model for identifying swallow types in esophageal high-resolution manometry

The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for Gastrointestinal Disease

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving presence in all fields and industries, with the ability to both improve quality and reduce the burden of human effort. Gastroenterology is a field with a focus on diagnostic techniques and procedures, and AI and big data have established and growing roles to play. Alongside these opportunities are challenges, which will evolve in parallel.

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Gastroenterology Trainee Education

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming gastroenterology, particularly in endoscopy, which has a direct impact on trainees and their education. AI can serve as a valuable resource, providing real-time feedback and aiding in tasks like polyp detection and lesion differentiation, which are challenging for trainees. However, its implementation raises concerns about cognitive overload, overreliance, and even access disparities, which could affect training outcomes. Beyond endoscopy, AI shows promise in clinical management and interpreting diagnostic studies such as motility testing. Thoughtful adoption of AI can optimize training and prepare future trainees for the modern healthcare landscape.

Mixed attention ensemble for esophageal motility disorders classification

Esophageal motility disorders result from dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter and abnormalities in esophageal peristalsis, often presenting symptoms such as dysphagia, chest pain, or heartburn. High-resolution esophageal manometry currently serves as the primary diagnostic method for these disorders, but it has some shortcomings including technical complexity, high demands on diagnosticians, and time-consuming diagnostic process. Therefore, based on ensemble learning with a mixed voting mechanism and multi-dimensional attention enhancement mechanism, a classification model for esophageal motility disorders is proposed and named mixed attention ensemble(MAE) in this paper, which integrates four distinct base models, utilizing a multi-dimensional attention mechanism to extract important features and being weighted with a mixed voting mechanism. We conducted extensive experiments through exploring three different voting strategies and validating our approach on our proprietary dataset. The MAE model outperforms traditional voting ensembles on multiple metrics, achieving an accuracy of 98.48% while preserving a low parameter. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, providing valuable reference to pre-diagnosis for physicians.

Artificial intelligence as a transforming factor in motility disorders-automatic detection of motility patterns in high-resolution anorectal manometry

High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) is the gold standard for anorectal functional disorders' evaluation, despite being limited by its accessibility and complex data analysis. The London Protocol and Classification were developed to standardize anorectal motility patterns classification. This proof-of-concept study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence model for identification and differentiation of disorders of anal tone and contractility in HR-ARM. A dataset of 701 HR-ARM exams from a tertiary center, classified according to London Classification, was used to develop and test multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms. The exams were divided in a training and testing dataset with a 80/20% ratio. The testing dataset was used for models' evaluation through its accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the receiving-operating characteristic curve. LGBM Classifier had the best performance, with an accuracy of 87.0% for identifying disorders of anal tone and contractility. Different ML models excelled in distinguishing specific disorders of anal tone and contractility, with accuracy over 90.0%. This is the first worldwide study proving the accuracy of a ML model for differentiation of motility patterns in HR-ARM, demonstrating the value of artificial intelligence models in optimizing HR-ARM availability while reducing interobserver variability and increasing accuracy.

Gemini-Assisted Deep Learning Classification Model for Automated Diagnosis of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Images

Background/Objectives: To develop a deep learning model for esophageal motility disorder diagnosis using high-resolution manometry images with the aid of Gemini. Methods: Gemini assisted in developing this model by aiding in code writing, preprocessing, model optimization, and troubleshooting. Results: The model demonstrated an overall precision of 0.89 on the testing set, with an accuracy of 0.88, a recall of 0.88, and an F1-score of 0.885. It presented better results for multiple categories, particularly in the panesophageal pressurization category, with precision = 0.99 and recall = 0.99, yielding a balanced F1-score of 0.99. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence, particularly Gemini, in aiding the creation of robust deep learning models for medical image analysis, solving not just simple binary classification problems but more complex, multi-class image classification tasks.

Artificial Intelligence Tools for Improving Manometric Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term that pertains to a computer's ability to mimic and sometimes surpass human intelligence in interpretation of large datasets. The adoption of AI in gastrointestinal motility has been slower compared to other areas such as polyp detection and interpretation of histopathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Within esophageal physiologic testing, AI can automate interpretation of image-based tests, especially high resolution manometry (HRM) and functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) studies. Basic tasks such as identification of landmarks, determining adequacy of the HRM study and identification from achalasia from non-achalasia patterns are achieved with good accuracy. However, existing AI systems compare AI interpretation to expert analysis rather than to clinical outcome from management based on AI diagnosis. The use of AI methods is much less advanced within the field of ambulatory reflux monitoring, where challenges exist in assimilation of data from multiple impedance and pH channels. There remains potential for replication of the AI successes within esophageal physiologic testing to HRM of the anorectum, and to innovative and novel methods of evaluating gastric electrical activity and motor function. The use of AI has tremendous potential to improve detection of dysmotility within the esophagus using esophageal physiologic testing, as well as in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract. Eventually, integration of patient presentation, demographics and alternate test results to individual motility test interpretation will improve diagnostic precision and prognostication using AI tools.

Artificial Intelligence and Anorectal Manometry: Automatic Detection and Differentiation of Anorectal Motility Patterns-A Proof-of-Concept Study

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is the gold standard for the evaluation of anorectal functional disorders, prevalent in the population. Nevertheless, the accessibility to this examination is limited, and the complexity of data analysis and report is a significant drawback. This pilot study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence model to automatically differentiate motility patterns of fecal incontinence (FI) from obstructed defecation (OD) using ARM data.

METHODS

We developed and tested multiple machine learning algorithms for the automatic interpretation of ARM data. Four models were tested: k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting (xGB). These models were trained using a stratified 5-fold strategy. Their performance was assessed after fine-tuning of each model's hyperparameters, using 90% of data for training and 10% of data for testing.

RESULTS

A total of 827 ARM examinations were used in this study. After fine-tuning, the xGB model presented an overall accuracy (84.6% ± 2.9%), similar to that of random forests (82.7% ± 4.8%) and support vector machines (81.0% ± 8.0%) and higher that of k-nearest neighbors (74.4% ± 3.8%). The xGB models showed the highest discriminating performance between OD and FI, with an area under the curve of 0.939.

DISCUSSION

The tested machine learning algorithms, particularly the xGB model, accurately differentiated between FI and OD manometric patterns. Subsequent development of these tools may optimize the access to ARM studies, which may have a significant impact on the management of patients with anorectal functional diseases.

An artificial intelligence platform provides an accurate interpretation of esophageal motility from Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry studies

BACKGROUND

Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry is performed at the time of sedated endoscopy and evaluates esophageal motility in response to distension. This study aimed to develop and test an automated artificial intelligence (AI) platform that could interpret FLIP Panometry studies.

METHODS

The study cohort included 678 consecutive patients and 35 asymptomatic controls that completed FLIP Panometry during endoscopy and high-resolution manometry (HRM). "True" study labels for model training and testing were assigned by experienced esophagologists per a hierarchical classification scheme. The supervised, deep learning, AI model generated FLIP Panometry heatmaps from raw FLIP data and based on convolutional neural networks assigned esophageal motility labels using a two-stage prediction model. Model performance was tested on a 15% held-out test set (n = 103); the remainder of the studies were utilized for model training (n = 610).

KEY RESULTS

"True" FLIP labels across the entire cohort included 190 (27%) "normal," 265 (37%) "not normal/not achalasia," and 258 (36%) "achalasia." On the test set, both the Normal/Not normal and the achalasia/not achalasia models achieved an accuracy of 89% (with 89%/88% recall, 90%/89% precision, respectively). Of 28 patients with achalasia (per HRM) in the test set, 0 were predicted as "normal" and 93% as "achalasia" by the AI model.

CONCLUSIONS

An AI platform provided accurate interpretation of FLIP Panometry esophageal motility studies from a single center compared with the impression of experienced FLIP Panometry interpreters. This platform may provide useful clinical decision support for esophageal motility diagnosis from FLIP Panometry studies performed at the time of endoscopy.

Automated Chicago Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning

The goal of this paper is to provide a Machine Learning-based solution that can be utilized to automate the Chicago Classification algorithm, the state-of-the-art scheme for esophageal motility disease identification. First, the photos were preprocessed by locating the area of interest—the precise instant of swallowing. After resizing and rescaling the photos, they were utilized as input for the Deep Learning models. The InceptionV3 Deep Learning model was used to identify the precise class of the IRP. We used the DenseNet201 CNN architecture to classify the images into 5 different classes of swallowing disorders. Finally, we combined the results of the two trained ML models to automate the Chicago Classification algorithm. With this solution we obtained a top-1 accuracy and f1-score of 86% with no human intervention, automating the whole flow, from image preprocessing until Chicago classification and diagnosis.