Maximum lingual pressure impacts both swallowing safety and efficiency in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

How Do Quantitative Videofluoroscopy Measures Differ Between People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Age-Matched Healthy Adults?

PURPOSE

Dysphagia is a leading cause of morbidity in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PwALS). Previous videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) in PwALS do not account for the influence of senescence. We aimed to compare swallowing in PwALS and an age- and sex-matched control group using healthy reference data to define typical and atypical values.

METHOD

We conducted retrospective analysis of VFSS data from 19 PwALS (10 male, Mage = 63 years, range: 47-82) compared to control data from a cohort of healthy adults. Participants swallowed 20% w/v liquid barium from thin to extremely thick consistency. Blinded duplicate VFSS analysis using the ASPEKT (Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing) method yielded descriptive statistics for 16 quantitative VFSS parameters by consistency. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to identify significant cohort differences. Additionally, the frequencies of atypical values (in the 25% tails of the reference distribution) were tabulated by cohort and compared using odds ratios.

RESULTS

PwALS showed increased frequencies of multiple swallows per bolus, incomplete laryngeal vestibule closure, and reduced hyoid speed across consistencies. By contrast, similar frequencies of atypical values for pharyngeal constriction and residue in both cohorts suggest that age-related changes may contribute to the presence of these features in PwALS.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis builds on previous descriptions of swallowing pathophysiology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by clarifying the extent to which aging may account for some of the atypical findings seen in this patient population. Longitudinal studies are recommended to further differentiate the effects of ALS from age-related changes in swallowing over the course of disease progression.

A Comparison of Lingual Pressure Generation Measures Using Two Devices in Community-Dwelling, Typically Aging Adults: An Important Clinical Implication

DESIGN

A multisite, prospective, and randomized within-subject design study.

SETTING

Five university settings in varied geographical areas in the United States.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare lingual pressure generation using the Tongueometer (TO) and the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) in typically aging, community-dwelling adults during three measurement tasks: maximum isometric pressure (MIP), regular effort saliva swallow (RESS) pressure, and effortful saliva swallow pressure (ESP).

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-seven typically aging, community-dwelling adults (aged 55 years and over) with no self-reported history of swallowing or neurological disorders were recruited to complete this study.

RESULTS

Strong positive associations were found between the lingual pressure generation measures from the TO and IOPI in all tasks in typically aging adults, with Pearson correlations ranging from r = .780 to .874, p < .001. Agreement between the devices (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient) ranged from moderate for the MIP (ρc = .78) and ESP (ρc = .61) tasks to weak agreement for the RESS task (ρc = .47). MIP, RESS pressure, and ESP were lower when measured by the TO compared with the IOPI, p < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

The TO measures lingual pressure generation similarly to the IOPI but pressures register lower when using the TO than the IOPI in typically aging persons. This supports the need for developing normative values specific to the TO device or development of a valid and reliable conversion formula from TO to IOPI normative values. At this time, the clinical use of reference values from the TO should not be generalized to IOPI normative values.